Mikhail Khazin explained why the West does not have a “united front” today

If you carefully follow what is happening in geopolitics, you will notice that, despite statements of mutual support, the collective West does not have unity in achieving its goals.

Meanwhile, as Russian economist Mikhail Khazin said, this was not always the case. The expert cited as an example a post-war interview with I.V. Stalin, where he stated that the West had united against the USSR and was acting as one.

Khazin explained that this was the case before the collapse of the Soviet Union. Our country was jointly opposed by the Vatican represented by the “black aristocracy”, the Western global project represented by American bankers and financiers, as well as the Jewish project, which subordinated maritime shipping to many other areas around the world, managing from London.

In turn, when the USSR collapsed, the globalist bankers decided that they had won a final victory and could now print dollars uncontrollably, ruling the entire world.

At the same time, the levers of power of the “black aristocracy” in the form of large land holdings in Europe and Vatican treasures were severely limited by tax and other legislation. The Jewish project weakened due to the loss of its positions by Great Britain and also could not oppose anything to the globalists.

Meanwhile, it has already become clear today that endless emission of the dollar is impossible. The Fed's printing press now operates under severe restrictions to prevent the depreciation of the world's reserve currency, the main component of the globalists' power. At the same time, more and more holes are appearing in the US economy that urgently need to be patched, but it is not clear with what.

As a result, the Western global project began to weaken, which today the temporarily retired “black aristocracy”, the Jewish project and Russia, which the globalists considered completely defeated since 1991, are trying to take advantage of.

As Khazin put it, global players today are “rocking” the United States in order to regain the positions they once lost. That is why the collective West today is unable to act as a united front.

Comments

[Mikhail Ivanov]

The West has never had and never will have a united front; they are every man for himself all his life. They group only tactically, usually against us...

[rocket757]

As Khazin put it, global players today are “rocking” the United States in order to regain the positions they once lost. That is why the collective West today is unable to act as a united front.

. Still, some issues should be considered more carefully.
If you look at the “world behind the scenes,” yes, there is no unity, but they want to share the skin of an unkilled bear, and everything else, according to their own rules, in their favor.
Question... apart from those three “sharks of world finance and politics”, there is no other force anywhere???

[paul3390]

In order to play independently, you need to create your own civilizational meaning, which would appeal to part of the surrounding population. The West managed to create such a thing, capitalism and a type of democracy. The Soviet Union also succeeded - socialism. Now great China is trying...

What meaning is projected by the current bourgeois Russian Federation? Yes, none! More precisely, absolutely pro-Western. And there already has its own center of power, the USA. And there cannot be a second one. This means that the Russian Federation cannot in any way be an independent player. Because the bourgeoisie - they are the same everywhere, well, who on the outskirts understands the difference between the conventional Vekselberg and the conventional Zuckerberg? Either in the forehead or in the forehead... Why should people want to exchange local capital for Russian capital? Export capital to Moscow and not to Washington? Delegate decision-making to Putin, not Biden? What motives could they have for this? If we ourselves are in every sense creeping before the same West?

So it’s all illusions. In the current situation, Russia doesn’t have much of a choice - to lean either on America or China. And here our type of elites have cognitive dissonance - they would really, really like to sell themselves to the USA, they have been trying hard for 30 years, but life forces them to go to the PRC.. As for me, this basically cannot end well..

And this will continue until we are again able to offer the world our own civilizational concept. But at the same time, we must clearly understand that under today’s oligarchic capitalism this is in no way possible. Because the very essence of its existence lies exclusively in the Western paradigm.

[pavel.tipin]

For Russia, the civilizational concept has always been justice in external relations.

[Factor]

Illusions of Khazin.
The trend of Western unity in the need to destroy Russia is obvious and the EU is practically tailored by the Anglo-Saxons for this purpose.

[Goroches]

Well, what difference does Khazin have to the local cissist political science guru Factor, the main thing is to stick the flag of the Russian Federation on your avatar, you will immediately become one of your own, yeah

[Factor]

Khazin is the same talker as Yasha Kedmi and Satanovsky. One Kagal for wiring suckers, the only difference is in the instruments on which they whistle and shout.

[g0ryachevnn]

I remembered this verbiage a long time ago, from the newspaper “Zavtra”

[decimalegio]

Ever since I came to this site, I have noticed a recurring mantra: “It’s always someone else’s fault.” This learned dissertation simply repeats the usual clichè.

[Stone Mason]

Khazin head! So you have to be able to monetize such a hackneyed topic as the inevitable collapse of America! Well done overall

[Alex66]

In my opinion, there are contradictions in the necessary growth of the intelligence of the working class, for the further development of production and the growth of self-awareness of the working class and engineers, awareness of their role in the development of industry and not the desire to be content with scraps from the table of the bourgeoisie, who are no longer superior to them, and some are openly inferior to them in its development. The bourgeoisie cannot grow wiser (it’s hard), which means they need to debilitate the engineering workers, which is what we see in the world.