The first “victor of the invincible” – cavalry general Bennigsen

15
The first “victor of the invincible” – cavalry general Bennigsen

Cavalry General Leonty Bennigsen. He was considered unlucky, but was the first to be called “the winner of the invincible,” and later he unsuccessfully competed with his peer M.I. Kutuzov. Bennigsen was a true professional who went through the wars of the era not only with glory, but sometimes with shame.

Bennigsen's biography, more a reference than a scientific one, was published in a number of sources, but we will try to look at him as the one who was the first to not yield to the invincible French general, first consul, and emperor. Moreover, in a series of publications in 2019 on the pages of VO for the 250th anniversary of Napoleon, the only gap remained an essay about General Bennigsen.



He served in Russia for almost half a century without receiving the field marshal's baton, but Bennigsen himself was most likely to blame for this. In Russia his name was Leonty Leontyevich, although Levin Theophilus von Bennigsen never mastered the Russian language properly.

The baron from an old Hanoverian family, who did not really like the Prussians, did a lot to save Prussia. Formally, he was born a British subject, since in the 18th century the king of England and Scotland was also the Elector of Hanover, but served Russia almost all his life.

Bennigsen served honestly, but was never recognized as an outstanding commander, although towards the end of his career he acquired an enviable reputation in secular salons. However, fortune was, one might say, indifferent to the Hanoverian mercenary, as, indeed, to most people like him.

For his high patrons, also participants in the conspiracy against Paul I, the disgrace turned out to be more serious than for Bennigsen. Apparently, it was no coincidence that he had no bright victories, and for a long time he did not receive independent command.

The first Polish campaign could have been a turning point in Bennigsen's career. Circumstances were such that Emperor Alexander I put him at the head of the army. Under the pressure of Napoleon, who was eager to place the victorious corps in winter quarters as soon as possible, she retreated across the Vistula, trying to cover the roads to Russia.


At the same time, it was necessary to defend Königsberg, the last great fortress in Prussia. The forces of the Russian army had to be constantly dispersed due to an acute shortage of provisions, but the French also had the same problems. However, they were clearly less prepared for winter, and the Russians also had Prussian land behind them, which was noticeably richer than Poland, devastated after uprisings and wars.

A variety of circumstances turned out to be in Bennigsen’s favor - and the first would be the illness of old Field Marshal Kamensky, because of which he later simply left the army. Here is the useless supervision on the part of Baron K. Knorring, who was safely dismissed three years earlier, and then Count Tolstoy.

And finally, how the army was unofficially commanded for several days by his eternal rival, General Buxhoeveden. He, not forgetting Austerlitz's nightmare, simply avoided supporting Bennigsen's corps at Pultusk. Near this town, 40 thousand of Bennigsen were attacked by the corps of Marshal Lannes, whose number barely reached 30 thousand.

At first, Bennigsen was unable to prevent the French from crossing the Vistula and even retreated to Ostroleka, but due to the inaction of the enemy, he again took a good position there. The Russians managed to withstand the blow of Lannes, who threatened that Napoleon would cut off the retreat routes for all other troops.


The French were repulsed, and Bennigsen immediately sent a dispatch to St. Petersburg with a message about the victory over Napoleon himself. Even then, someone hastened to call the general “the conqueror of the invincible.” The issue of appointing a new commander-in-chief was resolved by itself, and Bennigsen was awarded the Order of St. George, 2nd degree and 5 chervonets.

However, after the failure of Lannes, the French bypassed the Russian army from the other flank - at Golymin, forcing Bennigsen to retreat. Retreating through Ostroleka, the new commander-in-chief, still awaiting his appointment, burned the most important bridge, thereby not so much preventing pursuit by Napoleon as forcing two divisions from Buxhoeveden’s corps to join him.

A contemporary recalled:

“The retreat from Pułtusk took place amidst muddy roads and night frosts. There was no food. The soldiers got their food as best they could. The famine gave rise to an evil unprecedented in the Russian army - vagrancy. Thousands of marauders scattered in all directions, plundering villages and postal stations, which slowed down communications with Russia. Having not managed to take prisoners with armed force in any of the previous cases, the French caught many of our vagabonds.

The unrest was especially great in Bennigsen's corps. Brave to the point of heroism, he did not care about subordination and army control. In his main apartment, garrison service was neglected. Guards were rarely posted at the houses he occupied. In Rozhan, looters broke into Bennigsen’s rooms three times, even into his office, and instead of strictly punishing him, he calmly said: “Drive out the scoundrels!”

There is too much evidence from contemporaries, right up to Alexander I himself, who say that Bennigsen lost control of the army. Due to non-payment of wages, it came to charges of collusion with suppliers. However, circumstances again worked out in favor of the Hanoverian mercenary.

Napoleon did not pursue the Russians, stopped at Tykochin and returned to Warsaw, placing his corps in winter quarters at great distances from each other. Bernadotte's regiments stood at Elbing, Ney's - stretched along the Alla River. General Buxhoeveden suggested taking advantage of this.

The Russian vanguards even set out for Johannisburg on January 11 (December 30, O.S.), 1807, but on the same day a courier from Emperor Alexander finally arrived with a rescript appointing Bennigsen as commander-in-chief. General Buxhoeveden was sent as governor to Riga with a recall from the army. Out of resentment, he even challenged Bennigsen to a duel, which the latter wisely avoided.

But he did not abandon the offensive launched by his predecessor, because he believed that, having an army of 150 with 624 guns, he could not limit himself only to protecting the borders and covering Koenigsberg. However, the beautiful plan to stand with the main forces between the corps of Bernadotte and Ney in order to defeat one of the marshals fell through due to the slowness of the exhausted Russian troops.

Bernadotte escaped from the blow, and Napoleon decided to resume active operations. The Emperor hoped to bypass Bennigsen's left flank, cut him off from the Russian border and throw him back to the Vistula. The Russian headquarters managed to figure out this plan, and Bennigsen began to pull forces to Yankov, where only Lestocq’s Prussian corps was late.

The corps of four Napoleonic marshals had already concentrated against the main forces of the Russian army, and the position, which practically did not defend Königsberg, had to be abandoned after several skirmishes. The army, under the cover of Prince Bagration's strong rearguard, slowly retreated to Preussisch-Eylau.

The battle itself - the first of Napoleon's defeats, or rather, Napoleon's draw in a field battle - is the subject of a separate chapter from the story of Napoleon's 12 defeats (They defeated Napoleon. Heroes of Eylau). Here we will limit ourselves only to the main points that characterize the role of the Russian commander-in-chief in the events of February 7 and 8, 1807.

And again we recognize the professionalism of Bennigsen, like most of his subordinates, as well as the stamina and valor of the Russian soldiers. Victory did not go to Napoleon not only due to the prevailing conditions and a series of accidents, but because, among other things, the Russians and Prussians did not make serious mistakes. As is known, the great Corsican did not forgive them.

It must be admitted that Bennigsen missed a lot of opportunities to concentrate maximum forces on the battlefield, although he stubbornly pulled Lestocq’s 9-strong Prussian corps towards him. As a result, out of an army of 150 thousand people, less than half took part in the battle.

However, Napoleon managed to gather only a little more into one fist near Prussian Eylau. And he, and his marshals, and their troops in those days were not able to show all that they were capable of. But the Russian commanders were not inferior to themselves.

At first, Barclay, having a detachment five times smaller than the French vanguard, held out until darkness in the battle at Gough. The French then justified their failure by saying that it was very difficult to advance in deep snow. It was also not easy for the Russians; they retreated to Landsberg slowly and in complete disorder, but the main thing is that “the army was saved from a surprise attack.”

Then Bagration, a true genius of vanguard and rearguard combat, fought with almost the entire French army in front of Preussisch-Eylau and for the city itself. Prince Peter's detachment did everything so that the army could survive the general battle. However, the commander-in-chief actually removed the general from participating in it, holding Bagration responsible for the fact that on the night of February 8, Eylau fell into the hands of the French.


What caused this - confusion in the troops or erroneous orders of General Markov - is still a subject of debate among historians. Another thing turned out to be more important - the loss of a forward position in the city actually played into the hands of the Russians the next day. Coming out of the narrow defile, moreover, in a snowstorm, the French infantry immediately came under fire from Russian batteries located on the ridge north of Eylau.

Under other conditions, they might have been answered by French cannons from the heights outside the town, but a snowstorm rendered their fire ineffective. But Russian grapeshot struck Augereau’s corps almost point-blank. But before this, the diversionary attack by Soult’s corps against the lines and columns of Tuchkov and Essen had also failed poorly.

After about an hour, Augereau's corps, marching in a snowstorm, almost in full strength moved to the right and came under heavy fire from 70 Russian cannons from the flank. The divisions of Desjardins and de Bierre were driven back by a coordinated counterattack of grenadiers and cavalry, which almost broke through to the French headquarters on the outskirts of the city.

Napoleon was forced to save Augereau from defeat by a massive attack of 75 squadrons of Murat's cavalry. However, the Russians withstood both the pressure of Murat and the attacks of Davout’s corps. The Russian left flank retreated, losing first Klein-Sausgarten, and then Auklappen and Kuchitten. But the French did not succeed in breaking through, although the Russian positions bent at a right angle.


It is unlikely that any other army would have been able to withstand this situation, especially since Ney’s corps could threaten it from the rear. And after three companies of horse artillery were brought up from the right wing, on the orders of the artillery commander Kutaisov, and their 36 cannons opened fire on Davout’s columns from close range, it became clear that the Cannes planned by Napoleon would not exist for the Russians.

At this time, there was no longer a commander-in-chief at headquarters - Bennigsen himself claims in his memoirs that he personally went to meet Lestocq’s corps, with which he expected to respond to Davout’s envelopment.

Many of the participants in the battle, including Ermolov, later wrote that their commander considered the battle lost and was the first to “begin to retreat.” But how, in this case, should we evaluate the arrival of the Prussians and the powerful counterattack of Lestocq?

There are witnesses who saw how Bennigsen, together with the Prussian general, observed the advance of cavalry columns between Schloditten and Kuchitten. Bennigsen still did not win, and the battle is considered to be a draw, even in France. But the impression from Eylau was very strong.


The Russian commander did not do anything supernatural; the fact that he personally met Lestocq’s Prussian column should not be considered a special achievement of the commander. However, could you imagine Napoleon setting off to meet Pears near Waterloo?

No, the Emperor at Waterloo only limited himself to the famous reprimand to Marshal Soult, who replaced the irreplaceable Berthier at the head of his staff. At the decisive moment of the battle, Napoleon asked the Duke of Dalmatia what news about Grouchy, and, having received the answer that the chief of staff had sent a courier there, irritably said to him: “Berthier would have sent four!”

The Russians drove back Davout, brought Napoleon's cavalry into a terrible state, almost completely destroyed Augereau's corps and upset the ranks of the guard. And they continued to stand like a wall at their guns behind the same ridge where they met the first onslaught of the enemy. However, like Kutuzov five years later, after Borodino, Commander-in-Chief Bennigsen gave the order to retreat.

Leaving the roads to Russia in the already securely secured rear. Most likely, Bennigsen feared a blow to the rear from Ney’s corps, which could well have been supported by Bernadotte. However, Napoleon chose not to pursue the battered Russian army, given the heavy losses and extreme exhaustion of the troops.

But this did not stop his traditional victorious reports in the famous “Bulletin”, which few people believed even in France. Why after Eylau neither Bennigsen nor Emperor Alexander thought about concluding peace is not for us to judge, but in the summer campaign Napoleon will defeat his offender at Friedland and will actually dictate to “friend Alexander” the terms of the Peace of Tilsit.

The ending should ...
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    4 January 2024 05: 01
    An ambiguous person: not only ambitious, but also unprincipled.
    1. +2
      4 January 2024 08: 48
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      An ambiguous person: not only ambitious, but also unprincipled.

      The hero of the article was, first of all, a “German”, and not one of his own like Baklay or Osterman. He also did not shine with talents; he had a complex and quarrelsome character. The most curious thing is that, unlike many “natural Germans” during the wars with Napoleon, he remained distant from both his own and others.
      The Russian soldier of 1812 considered the Georgian Bagration, the Serb Miloradovech, the Hanoverian Winzengerode and a dozen others as his own, but Bennigsen remained Bennigsen. However, this does not detract from his services to our Fatherland.
      Thank you Alexey, welcome back!
      1. +4
        4 January 2024 11: 00
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        The hero of the article was, first of all, a “German”, and not one of his own like Baklay or Osterman.

        Barclay de Tolly belonged to another corporation of "Germans". Ostezeyskaya.
  2. +4
    4 January 2024 08: 15
    Formally, he was born a British subject, since in the 18th century the king of England and Scotland was also the Elector of Hanover
    When Elector George Ludwig was declared King of Great Britain under the name of George the First, a personal union with Great Britain was thus established, which lasted until 1837. What is a personal union? Countries included in a personal union are formally completely independent of each other, and theoretically one state of the union can even declare war on another if a parliament not controlled by the monarch has the corresponding powers. So Bennigsen was actually and formally born a Hanoverian subject. Schleswig-Holstein was connected by the same personal union with Russia, in the person of Peter III.
    1. +2
      4 January 2024 10: 52
      Quote: parusnik
      So Bennigsen was actually and formally born a Hanoverian citizen.

      Formally, after all, Brunswick-Luneburg)) Hanover is the name of the capital of the duchy.
      But Leonty Leontievich died as a subject of the Kingdom of Hanover. request
      Quote: parusnik
      theoretically, one state of the union can even declare war on another,

      theoretically - yes. But in practice, as far as I know, such incidents have not happened. Even the collapses of the Iberian and Kalmar unions began with the fact that the dissatisfied part of the union had its own king.
      1. +2
        4 January 2024 11: 59
        theoretically yes
        I agree, this did not happen. I just wanted to explain in simple terms that neither Hanover, let me call it that, nor Holstein, were neither British nor Russian possessions. Neither legislation nor legal proceedings, etc., applied to them. the indicated countries. The shift in emphasis to the fact that Bennigsen was a British subject is an attempt to point out that England had its own people around. The Englishwoman is shitting. smile
        1. +2
          4 January 2024 12: 09
          Quote: parusnik
          I just wanted to explain in simple terms that neither Hanover, let me call it that, nor Holstein, were either British or Russian possessions.

          Here I categorically agree with you! hi
          Quote: parusnik
          Shifting the emphasis to the fact that Bennigsen was a British subject

          I think this is just a compilation from the Russian wiki wink
          It says so there - “a subject of the English king in Russian service.” There is no such passage in either English or German request
          Quote: parusnik
          Englishwoman crap.

          This is holy! fellow
          1. +2
            4 January 2024 13: 37
            This is holy!
            And it’s not just that, it’s our everything! smile hi
  3. +5
    4 January 2024 08: 21
    Judging by Wikipedia, most consider the Battle of Preussisch-Eylau to be a French victory. Including the French wiki, contrary to what the author stated. Only countries of the former USSR, Germans and Turks write about a draw
    1. +4
      4 January 2024 12: 59
      Quote: Burer
      Judging by Wikipedia, the majority considers the Battle of Preussisch-Eylau a French victory

      Napoleon himself, according to Tarle (and there is no reason not to believe it), considered the battle of Eylau unsuccessful for him... exactly until he received a message about Bennigsen’s retreat. By the standards of those years, once he retreated, it meant he lost.
  4. +6
    4 January 2024 08: 46
    Considering that Bonaparte's star was at its zenith and his mere presence on the battlefield made almost everyone in Europe buckle at the knees, a person capable of playing a draw with him is already worthy of attention.
  5. +5
    4 January 2024 09: 38
    At Preussisch-Eylau, the French were very unlucky with the attack of Augereau’s corps, which the Russians took great advantage of. Reading memoirs dedicated to that war, you understand why they preferred not to fight in winter - almost impassable roads, enormous difficulties with supplies, and accommodation of troops for the night. This campaign is described quite well in the recently published memoirs of Bennigsen himself. Ermolov also wrote about this war.
  6. 0
    4 January 2024 15: 02
    Alexey, thanks for the article! Leonty Leontyevich is an ambiguous figure. But participation in Pavel’s murder definitely does not make him look good...
  7. -1
    4 January 2024 15: 17
    Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen! hi

    As Alex013 correctly said:
    But participation in Pavel’s murder definitely does not make him look good...

    Bennigsen took part in the coup of March 11-12, 1801, as a result of which Paul I was killed, and the throne was taken by his eldest son, Alexander I, who ruled from 1801 to 1825. It was during his reign that the events described in the article took place.
  8. Eug
    0
    6 January 2024 10: 10
    On YouTube there is an analysis of the Battle of Borodino, which says that it was Benningsen, without the knowledge and consent of Kutuzov, who moved the 18th corps from an ambush on the left flank to the center under the fire of French artillery and is directly accused of treason...