1553 Ivan the Terrible's illness and the crisis of power

42
1553 Ivan the Terrible's illness and the crisis of power
Seriously ill Ivan IV in S. Eisenstein’s film “Ivan the Terrible”


In March 1553, our country once again found itself at a crossroads, and its story could well have gone some other way.



This was due to the serious illness of Ivan IV, which some researchers hastened to declare a simulation: supposedly the tsar needed this “performance” only to identify disloyal boyars - and, of course, to deal with them.

True, these “traitors” had to wait a very long time for reprisals. Archpriest Sylvester, for example, waited for 7 years. And some boyars even 10 years before the establishment of the oprichnina. But Ivan the Terrible, apparently, was in no hurry. Today we will talk a little about this episode in the history of our country.

The king's illness


On March 1, 1553, a few months after returning from the victorious Kazan campaign, Ivan IV suddenly became seriously ill. And he was very young - he was not yet 23 years old.


Ivan IV, miniature from the Kazan Chronicle

What kind of disease it was, historians are still guessing, it is only clear that it was some kind of acute infectious disease, accompanied by high fever and severe intoxication:

“A great fire will come, that is, a fire disease.”

The king rapidly weakened and soon could barely speak. Already on March 11, everyone began to expect his imminent death.

Candidates for the role of the new king


So, the question of the heir to the Moscow throne arose “in full force.” Ivan IV already had a son, Dmitry. The Tsar's firstborn was born in October 1552; on June 4, 1553, he drowned on the way to the Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery. But while Dmitry was still alive.

Another thing is that many boyars did not want to swear allegiance to an infant, reasonably believing that power would be in the hands of the Zakharyin clan. The interests of the baby were predictably protected by representatives of this family, including Tsarina Anastasia, the first wife of Ivan IV, and her brother Daniil.

But other boyar families did not want the power of the Zakharyins; their opinion was expressed by the okolnichy Fyodor Adashev, the father of Alexei, a member of the “Chosen Rada”:

“We kiss the cross for you, sovereign, and your son, Prince Dimitri, but we will not serve Zakharyin, Danila and his brothers. Your son is still in diapers, and the Zakharyins, Danila and his brothers will rule over us. And we already saw a lot of trouble from the boyars when you were young.”

The influential boyar Ivan Mikhailovich Shuisky was also against the oath to Dmitry, who stated:

“We are not allowed to kiss the cross not in front of the sovereign. Who should we kiss in front of when the sovereign is not here?”

Archpriest Sylvester also took their side. They insisted on an oath to the tsar’s cousin, appanage prince Vladimir Andreevich Staritsky, who was then 19 years old.

There was, however, one more royal relative - Ivan IV’s younger brother Yuri, but he was deeply disabled, about whom Andrei Kurbsky wrote:

“Crazy and without memory, speechless, just like a diva he was born.”

In the chronicles, Yuri is called “unthoughtful and simple.”

In general, we have already said everything about the infant Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich; there is nothing special to add.

Let's say a few words about his rival, another contender for the throne - Vladimir Andreevich Staritsky.

The cousin of Ivan IV was born in 1535, that is, he was 5 years younger than the Tsar. His father was the youngest son of Ivan III and Sophia Paleologus, his mother, Efrosinya Khovanskaya, was descended from the Lithuanian prince Gediminas. At the time of marriage, she was 17 years old, her husband was 43: such a large age difference is explained by the fact that Vasily III, whose marriage with Solomonia Saburova was childless, and then Elena Glinskaya could not give birth for another 4 years, forbade his brothers to marry until then until he has an heir.


Marriage of Andrei Ivanovich Staritsky to Efrosinia Khovanskaya. Miniature of the Facial Vault

In May 1534, Andrei Staritsky quarreled with Elena Glinskaya over what he considered to be an unfair division of land. And his brother Georgy (Yuri) was also arrested in Moscow, where he was starved to death. In 1537, the ruler ordered him to appear with her nobles in Kolomna, where an army was gathering to repel the expected Tatar invasion. Andrei did not show up, saying he was ill, which aroused great suspicion in Elena, since there were rumors that the Staritsa prince was negotiating with the Moscow and Novgorod boyars about removing her young son from power. A letter from Andrei Staritsky to Novgorod has been preserved, containing the following words:

“The Great Prince (Ivan IV) is small... And who will you serve with? And I will be glad to welcome you.”

Having received a repeated order to appear in Moscow, Andrei Staritsky, taking his wife and son with him, tried to escape either to Novgorod or to Lithuania.


The flight of Andrei Staritsky to Novgorod, miniature of the Front Vault: “Prince Andrei from Torzhok... went to Novgorod the Great, wanted to settle in Novgorod.”

The fugitives were captured (Andrei gave up resistance after he was threatened with a church curse from Metropolitan Daniel), the Staritsa prince was sent to prison, where he died - in December 1537, and was buried with honors in the Archangel Cathedral of the Kremlin.

The Staritsky boyars and “children of the boyars” who accompanied Andrei were also arrested, and 30 of them were hanged. Efrosinya Staritskaya was placed under supervision in the Bersenevsky courtyard, which was transferred to the Moscow kings. And their son Vladimir was given to the care of the gunsmith Fyodor Karpov, who began his service under Ivan III, the grandfather of Ivan and Vladimir.

After the death of Elena Glinskaya, Efrosinya Staritskaya was released, and then she was given her son, to whom the appanage lands were soon returned. Before the birth of Ivan IV’s son Dmitry, mentioned above, it was Vladimir Staritsky who was considered the heir to the throne.


Ivan the Terrible, Simeon Kaschaevich (former Khan of Kazan, who transferred to the Russian service) and Vladimir Andreevich Staritsky speak at Devlet Giray, a miniature of the Facial Vault

Vladimir occupied a fairly prominent position at court. It is known that he was a thousand at the wedding of Tsar Ivan and Anastasia Zakharyina, despite his young age, he sat in the Duma and at the Stoglavy Cathedral, and during the Second Kazan Campaign he was the royal governor in Moscow.

In May 1550, Vladimir married Evdokia Alexandrovna Nagaya (in April 1555 he would enter into a second marriage - with Maria Odoevskaya, cousin of Andrei Kurbsky). He took part in the decisive assault on Kazan and was one of the first to enter this city.

In general, he seemed to many then to be a much more suitable candidate for the role of tsar than the infant Dmitry Ivanovich. And we remember that at one time Andrei Staritsky, Vladimir’s father, seduced the Novgorodians to come under his hand, citing precisely the youth of Ivan IV.

Election of a successor


In response to Ivan IV’s demand to swear allegiance to Dmitry, “there was a lot of fighting, screaming, noise between the boyars.”

“And there was a big rebellion, there was a lot of noise and speech among all the boyars: they don’t want to serve the baby.”

The king reproached them:

“If you don’t kiss the cross for my son Demetrius, then it means you have another sovereign. But you kissed my cross more than once, so you can’t look for other sovereigns past us. I bring you to the kiss of the cross, I command you to serve my son Dimitri, and not the Zakharyins. I can't talk to you much. You have forgotten your souls, you don’t want to serve us and our children, you don’t remember what you kissed the cross with. And whoever does not want to serve the infant sovereign will not want to serve the big one. And if you don’t need us, then it’s on your souls.”

Nevertheless, by the evening of that day, many boyars swore allegiance to Dmitry.

Pyotr Shchenyatev-Partikeev, Semyon Rostovsky and Ivan Turuntai-Pronsky continued to persist. Vladimir Staritsky also refused to “kiss the cross.”

Moreover, detachments of Staritsa nobles were summoned to Moscow, and the frightened tsar forbade his cousin to be allowed into his palace. Ivan IV turned to the Zakharyins and other supporters of Dmitry. Here is how V. Solovyov conveys his speech:

“You gave me and my son a soul on the fact that you will serve us, but the other boyars do not want to see my son in the state; so if God’s will befalls me, I die, then please don’t forget why you kissed the cross for me and my son: do not let the boyars inform my son, but run with him to a foreign land, where God will show you; and you, Zakharins! What were you afraid of? Or do you think that the boyars will spare you? You will be the first dead from them; So you would have died for my son and his mother, but you wouldn’t have given my wife to the boyars to mock, that’s on your souls.”

The next day, the tsar fell completely ill, and the remaining boyars were sworn in to Dmitry in his place by the princes Mstislavsky and Vorotynsky. Although reluctantly, the last “refuseniks” swore the oath. At the same time, Prince Ivan Turuntai-Pronsky reproached Vorotynsky:

“Your father, and you yourself, are the first traitor after Grand Duke Vasily, and now you are leading them to the cross!”

The last to “kiss the cross” were Prince Kurlyatev and Treasurer Funikov. Vladimir Staritsky was also forced to take the oath. Most of the trouble was with his mother:

“She spoke a lot of swear words. And from then on there was enmity, there was unrest between the boyars, and the kingdom was poor in everything.”


This is how Efrosinya Staritskaya was seen by the audience of the famous film by S. Eisenstein “Ivan the Terrible”, on the right behind her is Vladimir Staritsky

And Ivan IV suddenly quickly began to recover. And, as we have already said, he lost his son while going on pilgrimage. Vladimir Staritsky again became the heir to the throne, but did not remain so for long. Queen Anastasia gave birth to three children - a son, Ivan (March 28, 1554), a daughter, Evdokia (February 26, 1556, she died in infancy) and Fyodor (May 11, 1557).


Ivan IV, princes Ivan and Fyodor with the Kazan Icon of the Mother of God, miniature from “The Tale of the Kazan Icon of the Blessed Virgin Mary with the Service”

And in October 1582, the last child of Ivan IV was born - son Dmitry.


Image of Tsarevich Dmitry in the museum of the city of Uglich, photo by the author

Let us note that this son of Ivan IV was born from the seventh wife of this tsar, Maria Nagaya, while the church recognizes only three marriages as legal. And therefore, Dmitry, in essence, was illegitimate, had no rights to the throne and was excluded (along with all his relatives) from the list of royal persons. He was even expelled from Moscow to the city of Uglich and its environs given to him “to feed” - thus, he was an appanage prince, like Vladimir Staritsky.

Fyodor Ioannovich was married to Boris Godunov’s sister Irina. Tsar Fedor had known his wife since childhood, loved her very much, and she completely controlled her feeble-minded husband. At the time of Dmitry’s death, Fyodor Ioannovich was not even going to die - he would live another 7 years, Irina would still have time to give birth to his daughter Feodosia (and could have given birth to a boy).


A. Kivshenko. “Tsar Fyodor Ioannovich puts a gold chain on Boris Godunov.” Irina Godunova sits on the throne nearby

And therefore, Boris Godunov in May 1591 had neither reason nor reason to kill Dmitry of Uglich.

Doomed Dynasty


But three sons were not enough to ensure the future of the dynasty.

Ivan Ivanovich died in Aleksandrovskaya Sloboda on November 19, 1581, and his death is shrouded in mystery. Most people, following Karamzin and Repin, are sure that the prince was killed by his father - either when he tried to intercede for his wife (the third in a row), or when he was accused of treason after he demanded to give him an army to march on Pskov ( “taught to talk about rescuing the city of Pskov”).

However, since 1903, serious historians, following Academician N.P. Likhachev, believe that Ivan Ivanovich died of natural causes - after an illness that lasted 11 days. In 1963, an examination of the remains of this prince showed a 32-fold excess of mercury, lead and arsenic, which gave rise to allegations of his poisoning.

However, all these elements were part of medicines widespread in Europe, and at the court of Ivan the Terrible, as you know, foreign doctors practiced. The most famous of them was Elisius Bomelius, who even became a character in the drama of the popular XNUMXth-century Russian poet, translator and playwright L. A. Mei and the opera “The Tsar’s Bride” by N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov, based on it.


Elisey Bomeliy and Grigory Gryaznoy on the stage of the Helikon-Opera theater

True, Bomeliy came to Moscow in 1570 and had nothing to do with the treatment of Tsarevich Ivan.

Fyodor Ivanovich was proclaimed Tsar by the Zemsky Sobor in 1584, but all contemporary sources speak of the mental inferiority of this son of Ivan the Terrible. Swedish King Charles IX, for example, wrote:

"Russians in their language call him durak."

The Polish envoy Lev Sapega, who saw Fyodor Ivanovich, stated:

“In vain they say that this sovereign has little reason, I am convinced that he is completely deprived of it.”

The father himself was recognized as incapable of governing the state and therefore ordered the establishment of a guardianship council, which included I. F. Mstislavsky, I. P. Shuisky, N. R. Yuryev, B. F. Godunov and B. Ya. Belsky.

In the end, as we know, the country was actually led by Boris Godunov. His sister Irina, the wife of Fyodor Ioannovich, after the death of Tsarevich Dmitry, gave birth to a daughter named Theodosia. It was this girl who became the last representative of the Rurik dynasty. But Theodosia died at the age of two - at the beginning of 1594. And Fedor himself died in January 1598. If Vladimir Staritsky had not been killed in October 1569 on the orders of Ivan IV, he would have been the undisputed heir to the throne.

And Dmitry Uglichsky died 7 years before the death of Fedor - on May 15, 1591. The commission of inquiry concluded that the cause of his death was bleeding caused by a knife wound (or “poke”) that he inflicted on himself during a severe epileptic attack. However, some modern neurologists believe that the wound was not fatal. They consider the more likely cause of the death of this prince to be cerebral edema due to status epilepticus, a condition that even today often leads to the death of their patients.

Godunov’s enemies first accused him of Dmitry’s death, and then declared this prince to be “miraculously saved,” which led to the appearance of four False Dmitri in Rus', as well as other impostors. Among them were, for example, two False Peters who pretended to be the sons of Fyodor Ivanovich. A certain Fyodor also pretended to be the son of this tsar, and Lavrentiy attributed his birth to Tsarevich Ivan Ivanovich. There were also false princes August, Martyn, Clementy, Semyon, Savely, Vasily, Eroshka, Gavrilka and even Osinovik.

And the traditions of imposture will not become a thing of the past with the death of the last of them. Already in the XNUMXth century, a mysterious woman suddenly appeared in Europe - “Princess Tarakanova” (Daraganova), who would pose as the daughter of Elizaveta Petrovna from Alexei Razumovsky. And Emelyan Pugachev will take the name of Emperor Peter III, who allegedly managed to escape from St. Petersburg from the “prodigal wife Katerina and her lovers” who tried to kill him. And many will indeed consider him a true emperor - even during the time of A.S. Pushkin.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    27 December 2023 05: 43
    [B]
    If Vladimir Staritsky had not been killed in October 1569 on the orders of Ivan IV, he would have been the undisputed heir to the throne.[
    /b]No doubt...But he was killed. He didn’t have the chance to inherit the throne.
    1. +1
      27 December 2023 07: 19
      And before him (Staritsky) - Metropolitan Philaret (they were killed). More precisely, Filaret was killed earlier, and then Staritsky.
      1. +2
        27 December 2023 17: 29
        [B]
        killed Filaret[
        /b] Is Filaret a relative of the king?
        1. +1
          27 December 2023 18: 34
          Quote: parusnik
          [B]
          killed Filaret[
          /b] Is Filaret a relative of the king?

          No. I simply mentioned the fact that first Filaret died, and then Staritsky.
          1. +3
            27 December 2023 18: 39
            Gentlemen, I was wrong.

            The one I wrote about above is not Filaret, in Philip (I got the names mixed up). But Filaret (Patriarch of Moscow) was the brother of his first wife Anastasia Zakharyina-Yuryeva, i.e. he was a relative (albeit indirectly).
            1. 0
              April 13 2024 09: 30
              Filaret (Patriarch of Moscow) was the brother of his first wife Anastasia Zakharyina-Yuryeva, i.e. he was a relative (albeit indirectly).

              He is the nephew of Queen Anastasia. The queen's brother was Nikita Romanovich Zakharyin-Yuryev, father of Fyodor (Filaret). Subsequently, the Romanovs created the cult of Anastasia.
              Kinship with the last legitimate Tsar Fyodor Ivanovich gave the Romanovs a reason to lay claim to the throne. Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich was his cousin. But what the Romanovs were hiding was that Mikhail Fedorovich was also the cousin of Grigory Otrepyev through his mother Ksenia Shestova. That is, Ksenia Shestova, the wife of Filaret Romanov, was the cousin of Grigory Orepyev
              this is not Filaret, in Philip
              The death of Philip Kolychev (at that time the former metropolitan) is as much a mystery as the death of Tsarevich Ivan Ivanovich. Philip's life was compiled 100 years later, and the life was always adjusted to the current moment. Similarly, the story about the defeat of Novgorod by Ivan the Terrible was written half a century later, and under the Swedes, who then owned Novgorod and robbed it to the bone.
              It is known that Philip Kolychev died when he died. But it is known that Malyuta Skuratov was seriously wounded even before the arrival of the oprichnina army in Tver. Moreover, he was wounded in such a way that he could not kill anyone in such a state.
    2. 0
      27 December 2023 10: 52
      "I didn't have the chance to inherit the thrones"
      A subtle remark laughing
      Who knows, maybe Vladimir Staritsky would be a good ruler
      1. +2
        27 December 2023 17: 31
        Who knows, maybe
        Perhaps no one knows hi Happy New Year! love There are no alternatives anymore...
        1. +1
          30 December 2023 06: 54
          Thank you. I agree with the last one 100%
    3. 0
      April 13 2024 09: 09
      Vladimir Staritsky had a son, Vasily, who also died early, but managed to be Prince Staritsky. There was also a daughter, Maria Staritskaya, the wife of Magnus of Livonia.
      The last Rurikovich on the Moscow throne was Vasily IV Shuisky.
      Ivan Ivanovich died in Aleksandrovskaya Sloboda on November 19, 1581, and his death is shrouded in mystery.

      Ivan Ivanovich, according to the discharge books, died on March 18, 1582, quote "The same year in March, on the 18th day, the blessed Tsarevich Ivan Ivanovich, the son of the Tsar and Grand Duke Ivan Vasilyevich of All Rusai, reposed, and reposed in Oleksandrov Sloboda and was laid to rest in Moscow in Archangil."
      And this radically changes many versions of his death.

      Tsar Fyodor Ivanovich was never crazy (just read his dialogues), and was not weak, which was confirmed by the study of his remains.

      The Godunovs really had no reason to kill Tsarevich Dmitry. But they had a great reason to poison Tsarevich Ivan Ivanovich. Because Fedor, ruled by the Godunovs, immediately became the heir.


      ordered the establishment of a guardianship council, which included I. F. Mstislavsky, I. P. Shuisky, N. R. Yuryev, B. F. Godunov and B. Ya. Belsky.

      Let's pay attention to the names. Three of them (Godunovs, Yuryev-Romanovs, Shuiskys) became royal. Mstislavsky's son headed the Seven Boyars. Belskoy actively contributed to the accession of False Dmitry. These are the boyars who shared power at the cost of unrest in the country. And does anyone reproach Ivan the Terrible for repressions among the boyars?

      And if we remember that Grigory Otrepiev was the cousin of the mother of Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich, the picture of the Troubles generally becomes interesting.
  2. -1
    27 December 2023 05: 55
    Depending on traditions, the circle of participants in the political struggle can be very narrow (despotism) and wider (democracy). Perhaps the participants in the struggle should be called the word “demos” only if they are present everywhere on the ground on the territory of the state. Even if in the minority.

    During the time of Ivan the Terrible, it seems that there was no demos in Russia at all. There were only capital political groups. And the rest, as A.P. Chekhov wrote at the end of the 19th century, is a “colony”.
  3. +3
    27 December 2023 06: 03
    Thank you very much, Valery! hi

    About the four False Dmitrys. I know the first two. Where are the other two?
    1. VLR
      +2
      27 December 2023 06: 21
      False Dmitry III - either Sidorka (Isidor), or Matyushka (Matvey), “Pskov thief”.
      False Dmitry IV - "The Astrakhan Thief".
      There was also an “intermediate False Dmitry” - Molchanov, who quickly abandoned the impostor, since many knew him, and did not look like him, and supported the second.
      1. +4
        27 December 2023 06: 23
        Quote: VlR
        False Dmitry III - either Sidorka (Isidor), or Matyushka (Matvey), “Pskov thief”.
        False Dmitry IV - "The Astrakhan Thief".
        There was also an “intermediate False Dmitry” - Molchanov, who quickly abandoned the impostor, since many knew him, and did not look like him, and supported the second.

        Thank you very much, Valery! For the article and for answering me! Happy New Year to you! hi
        1. VLR
          +5
          27 December 2023 06: 29
          You too - Happy New Year and all the best smile
      2. +1
        27 December 2023 10: 45
        This is the first time I’ve heard about Molchanov. I should read it or ask Katya
        1. VLR
          +3
          27 December 2023 10: 50
          Mikhail Molchanov - one of the murderers of Fyodor Godunov, a close associate of False Dmitry I, the Dutch merchant, traveler and diplomat Isaac Massa called him “a great rogue and flatterer, who feared neither God nor people” and “a secret accomplice (of the Impostor) in all cruelties and debauchery” . After the murder of the first impostor, he fled to Poland and on the way told everyone about the salvation of the Tsar. In Sambir he tried to declare himself a saved tsar, and Ivan Bolotnikov recognized him as such. But Molchanov was not like False Dmitry, and many knew him, nothing worked out, and he himself abandoned the career of an impostor. Later he was whipped for participating in a conspiracy against Shuisky. Then in 1609 he found himself in the detachment of the Polish hetman Sapega, then in the Tushino camp of False Dmitry II - he became a okolnik under him. Then he was among the boyars who offered the crown of the Moscow state to the Polish prince Vladislav. During the Polish occupation of Moscow, he served as manager of the Pansky Prikaz and was cursed by Patriarch Hermogenes. In 1611, he was killed by rebel Muscovites.
          1. 0
            30 December 2023 06: 56
            However. His biography.
      3. +2
        27 December 2023 13: 22
        Quote: VlR
        because many people knew him

        Every dog ​​in Moscow knew Otrepyev too))
        1. +3
          27 December 2023 13: 36
          Molchanov, judging by what was written, was still much more famous than some monk Otrepiev, who “jumped out like a devil out of a box.” Still, he killed the legitimate Tsar Fyodor, and then became a close associate of False Dmitry I - that is, he was in plain sight. And before his appearance in Poland, probably few people knew Otrepiev by sight.
          1. +2
            27 December 2023 16: 53
            Quote: vet
            Molchanov, judging by what was written, was still much more famous than some monk Otrepiev

            Some monk Otrepyev just served as a secretary to Patriarch Job and a scribe in the Duma.
            1. +1
              28 December 2023 13: 25
              A secretary, a scribe - these are still not very public persons. And not too noticeable - who pays attention to some scribe? Sit on the sidelines and let him sit. Unlike the king’s close associate, who appears with him everywhere.
    2. +2
      27 December 2023 13: 29
      And these are only the “miraculously saved” Dmitrys)
      And there were two more Pyotr Fedorovich, Fyodor Fedorovich, several Ivanovs, Simeonovs and even one Tsarevich Lavrentiy))
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%86#%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%8B_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8
  4. +5
    27 December 2023 06: 14
    Ivan IV suddenly fell seriously ill. And he was very young - he was not yet 23 years old.

    Interestingly, at the same time, Edward VI, the English king, also fell seriously ill. Only now Edward got really sick and soon died, and the hero of this article was just pretending to see how his subjects would behave. Power, you know...
    1. VLR
      +5
      27 December 2023 06: 28
      According to this version, repressions against the “rebels” should have followed, but they did not happen. It is not logical: the king became convinced of the presence of rebels - and did nothing. Such a “purely academic” interest. But the repressions began much later - after the establishment of the oprichnina - 10 years later.
      1. +1
        27 December 2023 10: 42
        “in 10 years” you don’t admit the idea that Grozny, when he was healthier, could control himself.
        Considering his illness (epilepsy, alcohol), he was sane for a long time
    2. +2
      27 December 2023 08: 29
      Only now Edward got really sick and soon died
      The Sputnik vaccine was not found.. smile
  5. +2
    27 December 2023 06: 41
    in my opinion, behind the appearance of the most famous impostors in Russia, there was always one of the then enemies and “partners” of Russia. The ears of Turkey and England stuck out behind Pugachev, not to mention the ears of the Vatican behind Tarakanova and the ears of Poland with the same Vatican, behind the False Dmitrievs. In Russia, such “masquerades” turned out to be tempting and promising for the West, because one day the masquerade did not fire blanks and the Poles still pushed their man Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov onto the throne.
    As for the illnesses of Ivan the Terrible mentioned in the article and the traditions of masquerades with reincarnation in Russia mentioned by me, there is such a legend version that Ivan the Terrible, having lost his mind, was that blessed Vasilich, in whose honor there is a cathedral on Red Square in Moscow, popularly called the Cathedral St. Basil's. Perhaps this is really just a legend, although in Rus' all sorts of “masquerades” are possible...
    1. +5
      27 December 2023 09: 16
      Quote: north 2
      the Poles still put their man Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov on the throne

      In any case, some kind of dynasty was put on the throne. They are all practically the same and behind each there were sins. The Romanovs were not much different from the rest.
    2. VLR
      +4
      27 December 2023 09: 48
      not to mention the ears of the Vatican behind Tarakanova

      The French, Russia's recent allies in the Seven Years' War, became very interested in Tarakanova. They decided to send her to Constantinople, from where she was supposed to get to the front line with a detachment of Polish and French “volunteers” and appeal to the troops to come over to her side - after all, she was the “daughter of Elizabeth” and the “granddaughter of Peter I,” and Catherine II was not understand who, a stray German woman. But the impostor only managed to get to Ragusa, where she stayed in the house of the French consul - and here peace between Russia and Turkey was concluded. The French immediately lost interest in Tarakanova. But Catherine II showed great interest in her, and Alexey Orlov began his “hunt.”
    3. 0
      27 December 2023 14: 53
      The Vatican's ears are behind Tarakanova


      laughing
      The Vatican did not give her money.
      The French turned away.
      Radziwill abandoned her, hoping for the forgiveness of Catherine the 2nd (which he succeeded).
      And the British generally actively helped Orlov capture Cockroaches.
      The English Consul in Livorno, John Dick, participated in luring her onto the ship.
  6. +4
    27 December 2023 08: 28
    In March 1553, our country once again found itself at a crossroads, and its history could well have taken some other path.
    It didn’t go well.
    1. +6
      27 December 2023 08: 44
      Apparently, nothing good awaited the country in the event of the death of Ivan 4; civil war and “premature” unrest were quite real.
      1. +3
        27 December 2023 09: 51
        But death did not happen? The civil war and the “premature” unrest did not become a reality. Everything happened much later or is there something wrong in the commentary?
        1. +3
          27 December 2023 10: 01
          No, they may just think that this is a “good” alternative and a good path for Russia in the event of the death of Ivan 4 (not yet the Terrible). But, as it seemed to me when reading the article, it’s not very good.
          1. +4
            27 December 2023 12: 28
            Different peoples have a fairy tale on this topic of alternatives. Once upon a time there lived a husband and wife and they had three daughters. One day, the eldest daughter went to the well for water and did not return. They sent the middle daughter. She comes and sees such a picture of her older sister crying sobbing. She asked. She said. While she was getting water, she introduced herself. that she got married, gave birth to a son, he grew up, went to fetch water, fell into a well and drowned. They both began to cry sobbingly. The youngest came, having heard the story, joined the sobbing ones. Then the mother came. She began to cry along with her daughters. Finally, the father came. He listened to the story and said: You are stupid, stupid. Our grandson, nephew and your son are alive. I didn’t let him go to the well alone.
      2. 0
        April 13 2024 09: 39
        Apparently, nothing good awaited the country in the event of the death of Ivan 4; civil war and “premature” unrest were quite real.

        Everything would have been the same as in Ivan the Terrible’s childhood, when boyar groups ruled after the death of Elena Glinskaya.
  7. -1
    27 December 2023 10: 31
    Valery, colleagues, good day.
    For some colleagues, the day is in full swing
    Valery, you and Vyacheslav Olegovich, Eduard are a rare guest, decoration of the section: "History"
    Read for possible sharpness.
    I don’t believe that you don’t have your own version of what happened to Ivan the Terrible, and therefore I would like to know.
    Why didn’t the boyars want Dmitry?
    It’s more than clear: they remembered well what happened during the Paleologus regency
    In general, the regency is a scandalous issue, but in those conditions it’s a scandal in a cube.
    P
    S
    Colleagues, I can be rude now: my son is in the hospital. I argued with him for 2 days. He has the right not to return, but to serve in the district. He wants to return.
    We agreed that he would register on the website. He promised to be politically correct, but he is far from a communist
  8. +1
    27 December 2023 10: 41
    An evil fate generally hovered over the sons of Ivan the Terrible. The first son drowned. Agree, the story is murky - you can’t spot and save the little heir, from whom the dust particles are being blown away. The second son - either he was poisoned, or he was healed, or his father decided in anger. The fourth son (and again Dmitry, like the first who died, a strange fantasy) was either stabbed to death, or committed suicide, or escaped and caused the Troubles. The third reigned, but even with his death and its naturalness there are, so to speak, opinions... so it was not in vain that the Terrible was zealous in prayers, bowing down to the holes in the stone floor... He knew that he had committed great sins... But he did not pray.
  9. +2
    27 December 2023 11: 47
    “In 1553, our country once again found itself at a crossroads.....” The author of what are you smoking, what is our country like again?
  10. +2
    27 December 2023 14: 25
    Ivan 4 for us is like Henry 8 for the English. Fashionable figure in history.

    The reign of both was marked by a bunch of executions and marriages.
    Both their sons did not recover for long after them and their dynasties then ended...
  11. -2
    28 December 2023 17: 01
    The father himself was recognized as incapable of governing the state and therefore ordered the establishment of a guardianship council, which included I. F. Mstislavsky, I. P. Shuisky, N. R. Yuryev, B. F. Godunov and B. Ya. Belsky.

    That is:
    1) Fedor was declared unfit by his father.
    2) Fyodor therefore ordered the establishment of a guardianship council...

    Blood from the eyes((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((