"Model Castle"

51
"Model Castle"
Lauterstein Castle on a model railway along with large-scale figures of people



In the deep gorge of Darial,
Where the Terek rummages in the darkness,
The old tower stood
Blackening on a black rock.

"Tamara." M. Yu. Lermontov

History and castles. How many castles have been built in Europe? Their exact number is unlikely to be known to anyone, but the number of castles in Europe that have survived to this day has been more or less calculated - more than two thousand. And many castles, numbering several thousand, lie in ruins.



There was a period in history when previously built castles were destroyed to the ground, and in their place, at best, only a pile of stones remained, which local residents then took away for their own needs. They saw something symbolic in this. In France, for example, Cardinal Richelieu especially distinguished himself by destroying castles.

In addition, in the XNUMXth century, living in a castle became unfashionable, and the nobility began to move to the capitals closer to the royal court, which is why many ancient buildings were simply abandoned and turned into a source of cheap stone for local residents. And it is clear that to them, the peasants, their own stone cowshed or the fence of a garden with a vegetable garden was much more valuable than the history of their native country. Moreover, they wanted to sneeze at her, so they not only destroyed castles, but also knocked noses and hands off effigies in abbeys (and they also destroyed them!), opened crypts in the hope of getting rich, although according to the Christian faith, even the richest knights were buried in an ordinary canvas shroud. True, on the site of some ancient castles, new fortifications were built from their own material in the Renaissance style. Lucky were those castles in which prisons and barracks were organized. These existed until the time when people realized that they could make good money on ancient castles, and they began to restore them.


This is what the ruins of this castle look like today...

An interesting attitude towards dilapidated or even completely destroyed castles existed in the Middle Ages. There was even a proverb: “A ruined castle is a half-rebuilt castle.” And it’s clear why this was so. After all, getting stone, moving it to its place, preparing lime, gravel for heaping walls, wood for ceilings - all this cost a lot of money. And it is clear that the ruling lord, receiving this or that land from the king or as a dowry, tried in every possible way to save on construction.


Castle ruins and... a modern house. Photo by Jörg Blobelt


As you can see, very little remains of the castle. And this, in a certain sense, is good, since it opens up a lot of scope for the imagination of reenactors! Photo by Jörg Blobelt

For example, the royal castle of Beaumaris in Wales. It was built on bare ground for 18 months from 1278 to 1280. And 2000 workers worked on its construction every day! And according to the employment contract concluded with each worker, they were entitled to half a liter of wheat, and this amounted to 1800 hectoliters in six months! And this despite the fact that the personal royal estates produced so much grain in... a year! But it was not built alone! We know, for example, that the construction of Dover Castle cost a lot of money: 4000 pounds for the keep, 3000 for the rest of the buildings, lead water pipes, two chapels and living quarters with dressing rooms. No wonder King Henry and his son Richard the Lionheart paid for its construction for 12 years!


View of the castle in 1629

So it is not surprising that the ruins of the castle were considered by their new owner as a gift of fate, and he tried to put every stone to good use. Especially if it was already carved and could be used for an arch or... a latrine, because making a hole in a stone is not at all an easy task!


A typical picture of the Romantic era! The Lower Saxony State Museum is a local history museum of the federal state of Lower Saxony, located opposite the New Town Hall in Hannover


Tourist photograph of 1909


Another same photo from 1909

Well, in European and American culture of the late XNUMXth century - the first half of the XNUMXth century, the era of romanticism began, and wild nature objects, as well as ancient ruins, became the object of close attention of artists and poets, who began to unanimously sing of their “wild but pretty” beauty. Since the second half of the XNUMXth century, a number of castles have been restored, but it is clear that it makes no sense to restore them all. But this does not mean that ancient ruins do not bring any benefit today. They earn good money from them, and not only for viewing them as a tourist attraction. True, they usually don’t take money for just viewing the ruins; that would be too much. But next to them there may be a hotel, a restaurant, a souvenir shop that makes money from them. And there are also enterprising people who turn such ruins into... a castle, albeit reduced many times and for very specific purposes.


Photo with a view of the ruins of the castle from 1912

For example, Lauterstein Castle, located on a gneiss rock in the eastern part of the village of Niederlauterstein, above the left bank of the Schwarze-Pockau River, about 2 km northwest of the town of Zeblitz and 4,5 km northeast of Marienberg.


And in this photograph from 1920, the ruins of the castle are so hidden behind the trees that they are not visible!

Archaeological research in the 1970s showed that the castle was built in the second half of the 1304th century, making it very old. It was first mentioned in writing in XNUMX, when the castle was owned by a certain Johannis from the Erdmannsdorf family. The castle was built mainly from stone, hence probably the name ending in -stein (stein is German for stone). The purpose of the construction of this castle was to protect the medieval trade route between Leipzig and Prague, passing through the Ore Mountains. At that time it was a typical “knightly type” fortification - towers, walls, gates with a drawbridge. And since the castle was built on a rather high and steep rock, it was difficult to get to it.


Now a picturesque village has spread around the ruins...

Then, already in the 1323th century, the Schellenberg family began to own Lauterstein. But they did not own it for long. In XNUMX, Margrave Frederick the Brave defeated the burgraves Albrecht IV von Altenburg and Otto I von Leisnig, who supported the abbey, along with Lauterstein Castle and the town of Zkobelin (Zeblitz), and they lost it.


Lauterstein Castle, to the TT railway scale 1:20 (12 mm gauge). Photo by AUHAGEN


The same “house” from the opposite side. Photo by AUHAGEN


Castle plan

Then, already in 1434, Caspar von Berbisdorff of Freiberg, owner of mines and smelters in the Ore Mountains, bought it from Burgrave Otto II of Leisnig and Altenburg Lauterstein for 4000 guilders. His descendants Bastian and Melchior divided the lands and the castle in 1497 and received two possessions at once: Oberlauterstein and Niederlauterstein. In 1530, a strong fire damaged the castle, but a few years later it was restored. In 1559, Prince Augustus forced the Berbisdorf family to sell him the castle of Lauterstein for 107 guilders and appointed the Saxon Amt to manage the castle.


At one time, I assembled a TT scale railway for my daughter, with a map of the area and rails (I bought it in Moscow at Detsky Mir in 1978), and then for many years I bought additional locomotives, carriages and houses for her. But... I didn’t see this castle then, alas. But on the other hand, I made this castle for her out of paper and cardboard - glued together from a ready-made kit. Interestingly, it is still intact. Photo by the author

According to local tradition, on March 14, 1639, three Swedish horsemen set fire to the castle. It was not restored and has remained in ruins ever since. Lauterstein's administrative seat moved to Marienberg and then to Olbernhau and Zeblitz. It would seem that the history of the castle did not end there forever, because no one saw much sense in its restoration. But then the ruins of the castle “turned up” to the manufacturer of railway accessories from Marienberg - the Auhagen company, which began to produce a model of this castle, based on an image from 1629 on an approximate scale of 1:100.


And not just intact! When she grew up, we gave it to school No. 47, and now it is actively used in history lessons. The teacher I spoke with recently while taking photographs of it told me that the children really like the design, and that some of the kids, after seeing it, are trying to make a similar castle for themselves! And here we still believe (and write about it) in the old-fashioned way that all modern children do is stare at the screen of a mobile phone. Maybe adults just indulge them in this? So that we don’t have to do anything with them ourselves, and then blame all the shortcomings of our upbringing on the school? This is what this castle, by the way, looks like from the gate. Photo by the author

Here it should be noted that toy railways are a very popular thing in the West, and there, say, in Germany, there are many companies in the model railway industry. They produce locomotives, carriages, rails, switches, “gravel” (fill the tracks!), “grass”, trees, fences, cars, models of buildings, bridges, and figures of people (including kissing couples with a “leg-up!” and even... pregnant mothers!). All this is done at three international scales: H0 (1:87), TT (1:120) and N (1:160). The pleasure of having such a road does not come cheap. In particular, in Russia, a German set of one modern locomotive and two passenger cars costs more than 25 thousand rubles! But roads and sets of houses, which (although their parts are already painted, or rather, made of colored plastic) must be glued together independently, which requires a lot of work.


Another Lauterstein castle on the model. Photo by AUHAGEN

And it was just one of these “prefabricated houses” that Lauterstein Castle became. Moreover, the structure was developed as a background model: it was supposed to be located on the model of the railway “on the second line” and therefore can be used for all standard sizes H0, TT and N. Somewhere it will be “closer”, somewhere... “further”, but the fact that it will decorate the railway landscape is undoubtedly! This is what benefit an almost completely destroyed castle can bring!
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    26 December 2023 06: 09
    I remember how, as a child, I looked at the GDR advertising calendar "PIKO" with dioramas of railways. And for the New Year, my mother gave me 1:87 houses brought from Moscow, which I glued together to the best of my childhood skills. Oh, beauty!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    26 December 2023 06: 27
    Where did the locks come from? фахверк?
    1. +2
      26 December 2023 07: 27
      Quote: Luminman
      Where did the half-timbered structure come from in castles?

      It is shown in many ancient drawings and engravings. So it was.
    2. +3
      26 December 2023 08: 30
      I believe that it was most likely built on later, when the castle lost its main functional purpose.
      1. +1
        26 December 2023 17: 44
        Quote: mr.ZinGer
        when the castle was lost

        Probably!
  3. +9
    26 December 2023 07: 14
    In the 90s there were 2 simple roundabout railways from PIKO. One of them is still with my parents somewhere. And regarding locks, in the 90s there was a magazine called “IKS-Pilot”. There were various paper models with ready-made patterns, including locks. Yes, and there was also a paper model of a locomotive.
    Here, I found it)
    https://only-paper.ru/load/izdanija/iks_pilot/182
  4. +7
    26 December 2023 07: 19
    Thanks Vyacheslav Olegovich!
    I can’t resist, I’ll post a photo of my model.
    Good day everyone, with respect to Kote!
    1. +3
      26 December 2023 07: 30
      Look! What a fun souvenir model. You are just great, Vladislav! And I can’t think of a better way to play for children!
    2. +3
      26 December 2023 07: 39
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      I'll post a photo of the model

      I wouldn't have the patience for that... wink
      1. +6
        26 December 2023 09: 26
        Quote: Luminman
        I wouldn't have the patience for that...

        Patience and a little effort!
      2. +3
        26 December 2023 18: 10
        Thank you guys for your kind assessment of my trkdlv! hi
  5. +6
    26 December 2023 07: 20
    I once watched a series of programs about how an English family bought an abandoned castle in France for pennies and spent a long time restoring it. The head of the family had an obsession - I want to live in a castle! Oh, and we suffered with him. They squandered all their money. Then they rented it out for various celebrations and still ended up at a deep disadvantage.
    1. -1
      3 January 2024 20: 16
      Read the history of Fort Bayard - also from these same “stories”.
  6. +6
    26 December 2023 07: 40
    Lauterstein Castle, to the TT railway scale 1:20 (12 mm gauge). Photo by AUHAGEN
    TT scale is 1:120. Then the track will be 12 mm. Standard size G on a scale of 1:22,5 is the so-called garden railway, the track width is 45mm, and the most common scale H0 1:87 has a track width of 16,5mm. hi
    1. +3
      26 December 2023 09: 27
      Quote: Fitter65
      Lauterstein Castle, to the TT railway scale 1:20 (12 mm gauge). Photo by AUHAGEN
      TT scale is 1:120. Then the track will be 12 mm. Standard size G on a scale of 1:22,5 is the so-called garden railway, the track width is 45mm, and the most common scale H0 1:87 has a track width of 16,5mm. hi

      Yes, one is clearly lost! Happens...
  7. +7
    26 December 2023 07: 49
    Many thanks to the author.

    After such articles, for some time there is a desire to either buy a castle or a railway.

    Fortunately, not for long.
    1. +3
      26 December 2023 08: 33
      I remembered "If you want to ruin a friend, buy him a camera"
      1. +4
        26 December 2023 10: 36
        If you want to kill, buy him a motorcycle.
      2. 0
        27 December 2023 16: 06
        In fact, if you want to ruin him, buy him a model railroad and tell him which store you bought it from))) And there was also an epic German film “Love, Death and the Railroad” on these topics)))
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      26 December 2023 11: 57
      It should be noted that models are not actually the main thing in this hobby - the creation of a layout is required. The main money will go to the premises, the terrain with mountains and rivers - as without them bridges and tunnels are needed. The entire set of railway facilities and the main control system.
      Traction rods are now available with a processor at the board. The layout requires a digital console on which all traction is registered, which allows you to have several locomotives in one railway network and control them separately. Electric switches with remote control, semaphores, couplings, etc.
      There is already a set for 25 thousand - toys. True, the Internet market for this collectible goods is very developed, both secondary and stock from Western warehouse sales. .
  8. +4
    26 December 2023 09: 42
    How many castles have been built in Europe? Their exact number is unlikely to be known to anyone, but the number of castles in Europe that have survived to this day has been more or less calculated - more than two thousand. And many castles, numbering several thousand, lie in ruins.

    Right now in Europe, intensive work is underway to determine the “exact” quantity. It is most intense in Germany. It’s not surprising - Deutsche Burgenvereinigung (DBV) - German Castle Association, founded back in 1899. In 1999, Das Europäische Burgeninstitut - the European Institute of Castles - was founded in Germany, which coordinates the inventory and study of castles in Europe. Today, the institute has collected a unique specialized library of more than 40 books about European castles and palaces, an extensive archive of documents and a collection of plans.
    For each country, a digital database is created that contains data on location, age, type, history of ownership, construction, etc.
    In Germany, the work is planned to be completed by 2028, but according to preliminary data, there are approximately 25 castles in Germany. This figure includes all castles, even those from which there is no “ground monument” left in the form of remains of foundations. For example, Warringen Castle near Cologne, destroyed in 000. Nowadays, even its exact location is no longer known.
  9. +2
    26 December 2023 11: 15
    Others, tell me who knows.

    25 thousand STONE castles of Western Europe - preserved in one form or another, often ruins. But still impressive. Traces of former greatness and power...
    Why is stone rare in Ancient Rus'? mainly churches and monasteries, some of which have also survived to this day, such as Novgorod? Almost everything else disappeared without a trace, because it was made of wood. Mostly everything is made of wood, even palaces and fortresses.
    Judging by the pictures, in Rus' the Mongols in the 13th century, as a rule, stormed earthen ramparts with wooden cages on top. It seems that stone castles/fortresses in Rus' were not stormed due to the lack of them. The gates could have been made of stone, like the Golden ones in Kyiv.
    Kizhi is, as they say, already from the 17th-18th century, which is why it has been preserved.
    https://www.kp.ru/russia/kizhi/mesta/preobrazhenskaya-tserkov/

    In Prague, I was impressed by the beer cellar from 1242, again a stone building.

    Why did the 18th century in Russia calmly switch to stone buildings - palaces, fortresses, etc. They are still standing. If “there was no stone in Rus'” (and I heard this) - what were they built from? Although, as I understand it, stonemasons and stone craftsmen in general were invited from abroad...

    I have heard many different explanations for this phenomenon - from simply unconvincing to empty cleverness. Like, in Rus' there was no stone, but in Europe there was one. But in Europe in the early Middle Ages there were no forests, but we always had plenty of them (I visited modern Germany - I was impressed by the huge forests). In medieval England, all sorts of Robin Hoods quite successfully wandered through the dense forests. Without forests it is impossible to build a powerful fleet, etc., etc. Simple peasants often built for themselves from stone.
    1. +6
      26 December 2023 11: 49
      Well, if it suits you, we still had a lot of forests. But people don’t want to strain themselves... Klyuchevsky wrote a lot about this, by the way. There is also psychology. For a long time, due to the influence of climate, we prefer shock work. We are sick of hard work! But it is still easier for a prince to cut down a wooden hut or mansion than to make a stone house. You will be tortured by cutting stone... I advise you to watch one very interesting series “Pillars of the Earth” (2010) about the construction of Salisbury Cathedral. It shows well how they built from stone. By the way, Salisbury Cathedral was built in “only” 38 years. Others built... for centuries. But Peter the Great set people’s minds straight and began to build with stone. This is a very crude explanation, of course, but in my opinion... correct.
      1. +3
        26 December 2023 12: 30
        We are sick of hard work!

        Vyacheslav Olegovich, I don’t know how it is in Penza, but in my Moscow region - you look out the window, and there is unprecedented beauty, marvelous, snowy, every twig seems to be candied, and it’s scary to go out into the street, even though the roads and paths are cleaned with equipment. Now imagine the Middle Ages! Remember the picture, it seems, by Vereshchagin - “Let me pass, don’t hesitate!” What kind of construction in the wilderness is it made of stone, if the log house is completed in a season, in the worst case - in two? In fact, due to the small number of relatively warm days, the log houses were erected very quickly. There was even such a concept as a “fly-by-night church.” The team built it in a day, but the structure stood for centuries. If you didn't burn it. For example, in the same Kizhi, in my memory, one of the churches burned down, now they are not all there as they were at first.
        Labor is not sickening, it is excessively intense, hasty labor that is forced to be seasonal that is sickening.
        And thanks for the article!
        Greetings to you, greetings to all my good friends and as yet unknown colleagues!
        1. +1
          26 December 2023 13: 44
          Quote: depressant
          In fact, due to the small number of relatively warm days, the log houses were erected very quickly.

          You're right!
          Quote: depressant
          Labor is not sickening, it is excessively intense, hasty labor that is forced to be seasonal that is sickening.

          And you are right about this. You just formulated it better than me. But where is it written that my formulations are some kind of absolute?
          1. +1
            26 December 2023 16: 03
            But where is it written that my formulations are some kind of absolute?

            Apparently I was too harsh.
            And all because YouTube was turned off. Not a day goes by that I don't go there. Lots of stories about saving animals. People pick up seemingly hopeless dogs and cats, such that I shudder looking at these crippled skeletal creatures, and people take them in and nurse them - there is no limit to human kindness. And then I turn to myself, or rather, to myself, and I understand that I don’t have a soul of that size. But glory to those who have a big soul, and the daily confirmation of this fact are like crutches of my own...
            And then they turned it off, the life-giving source disappeared, and it immediately became frosty.
            Now they’ve returned me, I’m there again, looking for support, I found it, it’s easier - forgive me, Vyacheslav Olegovich, if I offended you)))
            By the way, a lot of architectural monuments are shown there.
            1. +1
              26 December 2023 17: 42
              Quote: depressant
              Apparently I was too harsh.

              What do you? I'm just trying to express myself comprehensively. So what are the grievances?! In general, I would borrow one of your phrases about work, I liked it so much.
        2. +3
          26 December 2023 17: 26
          "Let me pass, don't hesitate!"
          Lyudmila Yakovlevna, the painting is called "Don't hesitate! Let me come." That is, don’t scare them away, let them come and we’ll sort it out.
          1. +2
            26 December 2023 17: 42
            The painting is called "Don't hesitate! Let me come."

            Yes, I'm such a bungler wassat )))
            I reproduced the name from memory instead of clarifying it. My head is swollen from what is happening, neurons are cutting off previous connections with each other, uncontrollably forming new ones, playing pranks)))
            1. +1
              26 December 2023 18: 47
              My head is swollen from what is happening, neurons are cutting off previous connections with each other, uncontrollably forming new ones, playing pranks)))
              This is the weather. The students don’t let me relax, it’s a test session. The first year already has electronic records; only the second year and beyond have the classic ones.
        3. +3
          26 December 2023 18: 32
          Vyacheslav Olegovich, I don’t know how it is in Penza, but in my Moscow region - you look out the window, and there is unprecedented beauty, marvelous, snowy, every twig seems to be candied, and it’s scary to go out into the street, even though the roads and paths are cleaned with equipment. Now imagine the Middle Ages!

          Just an hour ago I was pulling out a VAZ-2114 stuck in the middle of Cosmonauts Avenue in Yekaterinburg, three hours earlier on the street. Alexandra Kazitsina in the center of Pyshma - Duster, what’s going on in the courtyards and on secondary streets - I’m silent!!!
          My personal opinion is why we preferred to build from wood, only one. Wood is warmer than stone.
          1. +1
            26 December 2023 19: 54
            Here, as they say, I cannot remain silent - who is it that we care about “foreign specialists” in cleaning up the territory, eh? Are there any here? I went out in the morning, the tractor was purring, driving, clearing away our heavy snow, but it had to happen that right in front of my house there was some kind of magical turnaround with deep ruts full of water, and in front of it, a turnaround that I had difficulty overcoming, two " specialist" with eagle eyes and one orange shovel. Returning home later, I found neither “specialists” nor a shovel, and the potholes and ruts had noticeably grown in size.
            I can imagine what it would have been like to use such a workforce on high-impact construction sites in the Middle Ages.
      2. +3
        26 December 2023 12: 41
        Stone buildings are more labor-intensive, construction is possible only in warm weather, when you need to work in the fields, but with wood, on the contrary, it is better in winter.
        Stone buildings require complex foundations, and for our freezing soils this is a problem squarely.
        Ownership rights to forest wealth also differ between us and Europe.
        Peter the Great intensified the construction of stone (mostly brick) buildings. But basically it was a government order. In St. Petersburg, until the mid-19th century, more than half of the residents lived in wooden buildings. (I can clarify the percentages and ratio by year in the evening).
        In Europe, stone construction took place multiple times on the same site. To begin with, almost 50% of the cost of preparing the territory and foundation. Therefore, it was profitable to use the ruins. The most non-standard and labor-intensive work has already been carried out.
        By the way, in Karelia it was fashionable to take the ruins of Finnish farms and build new houses on their foundations from boulders.
        1. +3
          26 December 2023 18: 44
          Peter the Great intensified the construction of stone (mostly brick) buildings. But basically it was a government order.

          I agree!
          Let me add that in addition to the “order” there was also a ban on building with stone in other places, as well as a tax. The latter consisted of the fact that everyone arriving in Northern Palmyra by cart or lodeyno had to bring cash.
          In addition to wood, clay was used in the early buildings of St. Petersburg. It is not uncommon for such houses to collapse during floods. I think the St. Petersburg guys will write in more detail.
          1. +2
            26 December 2023 23: 10
            Vladislav, as they say, “not everything is so simple.” There was no categorical ban. There was an order to gather stone craftsmen in St. Petersburg, so in Russia as a whole stone construction slowed down. For a more accurate understanding, you need to read the decrees of Peter. Stones (cobblestones) were indeed collected from every cart and every barge. They were used to pave streets. The collection was carried out at the entrance to the city by the so-called “distant slingshots” - the village of Nizhnie Pulkovo. There were also medium slingshots and close ones wink .
            Regarding adobe, it is not recorded in noticeable quantities. Wood or brick. Natural stone for cladding, and the walls are brick. For example, the Peter and Paul Fortress - brick walls with soil backfill. Subsequently, the Neva walls and bastions were finished with granite. Catherine the Great wanted to look from the Winter Palace at the decent walls of the fortress. Wood was actively used. In 1881, according to the census, there were 11169 stone and 10232 wooden houses in the city, and they continued to be actively built until the beginning of the 20th century. Both stone and wooden buildings were plastered, so sometimes it is difficult to determine the material of the walls from the outside.
            Brick was produced at several factories in the vicinity of the city. The ponds of Moscow's Victory Park are former quarries of a brick factory.
            Clay brick, as a material for standard construction, was proposed by Nikolai Lvov, the author of the Priory Palace in Gatchina. But apart from this building, there are no other buildings left in the adobe technology. And even there, a powerful wooden frame is built into the walls and the stone core of the tower and some stone reinforcements are built in.
            These are a few words from St. Petersburg.
            1. 0
              27 December 2023 16: 34
              Thanks for the extended comment!
              hi
              1. +1
                27 December 2023 18: 22
                St. Petersburg is not medieval Europe. A lot of documents - don’t be lazy to read. The state archives are in order - they didn’t burn, they didn’t drown. They were diligently collected by the capital's institutions. The highest persons showed interest in the development of architecture. Catherine the Great (not personally, of course, but the relevant department) paid extra for the splendor of the facade on the main streets, Nicholas the First personally signed projects for iconic buildings, the public actively discussed certain architectural innovations, newspapers wrote (regular columns) about architecture, and books, for example. Pylyaev, of that time are very interesting.
                In Soviet times, many publications were devoted to both architecture and the peculiarities of building construction. Now there are also many studies and articles devoted to these issues. There is a pool of inaccessible, but very information-intensive examinations of iconic buildings. They (the examinations) are prepared as a basis for subsequent restoration work.
                So, rather, you need to be able to separate primary materials from subsequent layers and inventions, and there is a “bulk” of information. This means that a detailed commentary on St. Petersburg spans more than one article.
      3. +2
        26 December 2023 12: 43
        Correct, but, IMHO, not the only one.

        A castle is a fortress of a feudal lord, a knight, of whom there were none in Russia.

        Cities in Russia, except, perhaps, Novgorod, Pskov and those close to them, are fortresses built by decree of the ruler to protect borders, and only then - a place for trade and crafts. Cities in Europe arose as markets, a place for artisans, and then were surrounded by a wall - under certain conditions.

        Almost all of Europe was under the Romans, who built with stone.

        Our statehood began from the time of Rurik, by this time Europe had already experienced a lot and managed to set up (and destroy).

        Maybe this is the reason for our differences - the Romans, who did not reach us. :)

        IMHO, we have a different story, different motives - hence the different materials.
        1. +3
          26 December 2023 13: 46
          Quote: S.Z.
          Maybe this is the reason for our differences - the Romans, who did not reach us. :)

          And this too! And we didn’t have a Renaissance, because there was nothing to revive! Just borrow.
          1. 0
            27 December 2023 16: 45
            I have another version (without claiming to be true))) If we look, stone fortresses in Rus' / in Russia - for a very long time these were Kremlins in large administrative centers. Apparently, they tried to protect them first of all. And no matter how much I read the history of Europe, everyone there always fought against everyone else. Every smallest vassal constantly quarreled with his neighbors. Well, he built his own fortress. I think that’s why Richelieu destroyed these castles in order to destroy the nests of partisanship. By the way, when in Europe large states began to be formed from small pieces, then castles, if they were built, were to show the wealth of their owners, and they looked more like palaces.
            In Rus'/in Russia there was also a time of civil strife, but there were 2 large periods - feudal fragmentation before and during the Mongol invasion, and a time of troubles. Between these periods and after them, fortresses were rather needed more for protection against external invasions. And when the small European kurkul-feudal lords were fighting with each other, a centralized state had already formed in Rus' (under Ivan III), and all the feudal lords walked under the sovereign, and did not have such freedom as all these European chevaliers/caballeros. No one would allow them to build personal fortresses (a few exceptions only confirm the rule). But again, these are my personal assumptions. To summarize: in Rus' feudal fragmentation lasted less time than in Europe, and a centralized state was formed much earlier
    2. +3
      26 December 2023 12: 53
      Just compare: heat the same volume “in wood” and “in stone”...
      1. +2
        26 December 2023 15: 36
        It's not warmer in Scandinavia.
        1. +3
          26 December 2023 18: 48
          Quote: S.Z.
          It's not warmer in Scandinavia.

          Warmer. The only exception is the territory of Norway and then... Let me remind you that our Murmansk is an ice-free seaport.
    3. -1
      3 January 2024 20: 20
      my version is that we had no stability.
      then the Tatars will start a rebellion, then the prince’s two brothers will form a quarrel and go “army against army,” then it’s time to fight with the Lithuanians, then the Novgorods (and then the Swedes press from above), and from below the Crimea is being driven into full force and Russian slaves are being sold to Genoa and Constantinople .
      + we had serfs - I think they were not spared at all (food, dues, property), the prince and the boyar families. That's why there was no motivation to do anything.
      but in Europe there were still no slaves.
  10. +4
    26 December 2023 13: 01
    sets of houses, which (although their parts are already painted, or rather, made of colored plastic)

    The GDR VERO Modelle houses were painted exactly where needed, the rest of the details were painted en masse. And the set included VOLUMETRIC details: “a four-wall building without windows, without doors”, multi-pitched roofs...
    The current FRG buildings have only flat sloped walls; it’s good that at least the complex spiers and domes are given three-dimensional details.
    Killed a competitor - and you can degrade?..
    1. +3
      26 December 2023 13: 47
      Quote: Quzmi4
      The current FRG buildings have only flat sloped walls; it’s good that at least the complex spiers and domes are given three-dimensional details.

      Unfortunately, I haven’t seen any modern ones. I only know the GDR ones.
      1. +3
        26 December 2023 16: 31
        In the Russian Federation they sell PICO, Auhagen, Vollmer... However, I didn’t immediately discover the composition of the kits.
        And here is another GDR-ish one, here the walls are flat, you have to assemble a “box”, but the facades are painted, a completely different, less “toy” look.
        1. +1
          26 December 2023 17: 38
          I had a lot of VEROs. Someday I’ll assemble my granddaughter’s railway, take a photo and post it...
    2. +3
      26 December 2023 15: 55
      Well, I found it in the “endless trash heaps...”
      I remember there was also a Savings Bank (Sparkasse), so the tiles facing the basement were painted; I didn’t find it on the Internet.
  11. 0
    27 December 2023 06: 51
    Quote: S.Z.
    A castle is a fortress of a feudal lord, a knight, of whom there were none in Russia.

    Cities in Russia, except, perhaps, Novgorod, Pskov and those close to them, are fortresses built by decree of the ruler to protect borders, and only then - a place for trade and crafts. Cities in Europe arose as markets, a place for artisans, and then were surrounded by a wall - under certain conditions.

    Almost all of Europe was under the Romans, who built with stone.


    1) “A castle is a fortress of a feudal lord, a knight, of whom there were none in Russia” - in Rus', princes and boyars also fortified themselves as best they could - towers, castles, etc., but everything was made of earth and wood. I think that they would not have refused a ready-made stone solid castle, but they did not build it... Even during the period of bloody feudal strife and constant raids of all kinds of evil spirits.

    2) “Cities in Russia, except, perhaps, Novgorod, Pskov and those close to them, are fortresses built by decree of the ruler to protect borders, and only then - a place for trade and crafts. Cities in Europe arose to protect borders and then surrounded wall - under certain conditions."

    So, it turns out that the fortress was by decree of the ruler “to protect the borders” of Rus' - an earthen rampart with a wooden palisade would be enough for it. But “markets, a place for artisans” in Western Europe - here you cannot do without stone walls with towers.

    3) “Almost all of Europe was under the Romans, who built with stone” - the Romans were nowhere near in most of Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Scandinavia, etc. And there are plenty of stone castles, fortresses (their remains, picturesque ruins).

    I draw the line, gentlemen. Everything is past. Not convinced. The search for convincing answers continues...

    However, frozen soil for the foundation is already closer. But why then began to actively use stone (brick)? All northern Russian fortresses are made of stone.
    https://www.nasolovki.ru/places/?ELEMENT_ID=3130 - Соловецкую крепость/монастырь начали строить в 1582, за 12 лет из камня построили.
    Староладожская крепость опять же - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B6%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C

    It would be like this everywhere...
  12. +1
    27 December 2023 16: 00
    Thanks for the article about railway modeling! Balm for the soul))) Among the endless wars and shells, there is something lamp-like, warm and homely))