Expedition to the ancestors. Round broch – a house for permanent residence

61
Expedition to the ancestors. Round broch – a house for permanent residence
This is what this tower looks like - a broch, right on the seashore...


- Who, who lives in the little house?
Who, who lives in a low place?
Nobody responds.
A mouse entered the little house
and began to live in it.
Russian folktale

Migrants and migrations. When our distant ancestors began their travels around the world. Where did they spend the night?



American settlers of the XNUMXth century spent the night in wagons placed in a circle. And, probably, the same Andronovo residents settled in for the night in the same way. They placed four-wheeled carts in a circle, placed war chariots inside, burned fires there, and prepared food. The horses (or rather, some part of them) also had to be inside in case of an attack. But most of them grazed outside under the reliable protection of people and dogs.


Perhaps he once had such a device inside! And this is how activists of the project to turn it into a tourist site want to restore it. Photo by Caithness Broch Project

Well, if there was a forest nearby, then they could easily build temporary dwellings in the form of huts or Indian wigwams covered with animal skins. And then we hit the road again, and so on until our migrants began to feel the urge to settle down.

And then they built their dwellings both from stone and from rods coated with clay, but they were always round. This, apparently, was the memory of our ancestors, the memory of round huts. “The home should be round!” - passed down from generation to generation, and on the island of Cyprus, in the settlement of Khirokitia, people have been building such houses for more than a thousand years.


We have been interested in brochs for a very long time...

And then round houses are replaced by rectangular ones.

But where people reached last, the memory of their ancestors or the inertia of thinking forces them to continue to build round residential buildings. Moreover, in some places on the planet they are still preserved.

These are the so-called brochs - round defensive structures of the early Iron Age, built using dry masonry technology, that is, without mortar holding the stones together.

Interestingly, such structures are characteristic only of Scotland, where about 570 of them have been found to date! The word broch itself came into English from the Old Norse language and, in its exact translation, means nothing more than “fortress.”


Broch section on Musa Island

However, brochs are not just stones laid around the perimeter.

They are quite complex in their architectural design. Typologically, they are classified as “complex Atlantic round houses” - this classification was invented by Scottish archaeologists who proposed it in the 1980s.

The cultural affiliation of the Brochs has not been fully determined. Until the 1960s everyone believed that they were built by the Celts. They were at enmity with their mainland relatives and again migrated farther away. But “further away” there was only the sea. So they began to build such fortified houses.

But then archaeological sites were discovered indicating that this was the creation of the Picts. Although when the Picts disappeared, anyone and everyone could live in them!


Stairs inside the walls leading upstairs. Photo geograph.org.uk

It is believed that the earliest brochs were erected around the XNUMXst century BC. e.

The original height of the brochs is unknown to anyone. The fact is that although there are many of them, most of them have not been preserved in their original form. Only six towers are more than 6,5 meters high, and the record holder for height and preservation, the Musa Broch in the Shetland Islands, has a height of 13 meters.

Well, if the brochs also had roofs (they, of course, have not survived to this day), then their height could be even greater. The diameter of the brochs ranged from 5 to 15 meters. Moreover, it has been proven that some of them surrounded small residential buildings.


People at the top. Photo geograph.org.uk

As for the “Tower of Musa”, this structure is about 2000 years old, and today it is the tallest broch in Scotland. The time of construction is somewhere between 300 and 100 AD. BC e., and they believe that in their stories this broch dates back to two eras at once.

Initially, inside its stone walls, there was a wooden structure with floors and stairs. Then a spiral stone staircase was built there, along which today you can climb to the very top.

The view from there is beautiful, downright “poetic”, so it could very well play the role of a watchtower. Its dimensions are relatively small and, perhaps, that is why it is so well preserved.

And Musa Island has always been sparsely populated. So there was no one to take it to stones for their own buildings.


View of the broch wall from the inside. Photo geograph.org.uk

Broch Musa is mentioned in two Scandinavian sagas: the first tells about a man whose mother is languishing in captivity, and he cannot save her. And the second one tells about a couple of lovers who are also fleeing from hostile machinations on a ship, and it crashes, and they escape and hide in this tower.

Then the broch was chosen by smugglers for their dark deeds. And now it is located on the territory of a bird sanctuary, where storm petrels live in abundance*.


View from the tower. Photo geograph.org.uk

There is a project to restore this broch in order to return it to its original appearance. Moreover, the project called “Caithness Broch” is funded by charity.

The reconstructed broch will be furnished with period furniture. Kitchen utensils will be hung on the walls, and excursions for tourists will be conducted by actors in traditional historical costumes.

“This will be the embodiment of history,” say the authors of this project, and it is very possible that this broch will become the main tourist attraction not only of this island, but of the entire region, and even end up on the banknotes of Scotland.

The population is leaving these places - who would like to live in such a wilderness. So the discovery of such an interesting historical monument will also revive the economy of these places.


Sign at the entrance. Photo geograph.org.uk

There's nothing special inside today. Although the building itself is impressive in its size. And you can’t help but wonder how much work it took to build this “smallest broch”: to get stones for it, to transport it to the construction site, to lay them one on top of the other. And without the use of a fastening solution.


Water container on a stone base. Photo geograph.org.uk

Once inside, the visitor can ascend an internal staircase to an open passage above.

This is the only broch that is completely preserved right up to the top, including the original internal staircase. It is built of dry stone without mortar, so any damage to the masonry can have serious consequences. In addition, its walls are hollow inside, that is, double.

In its original state it undoubtedly contained a complex wooden round house with at least one raised floor resting on a projection 2,1 m above the ground. This floor was probably reached by a stone staircase inside the wall.

A second projection at a height of about 3,9 m could support a second floor or roof. The entrance passage was low and covered with flat slabs, and a water reservoir was carved into the underlying rock. There was also a large rectangular hearth on the rock.


Bird's eye view of the broch. Photo geograph.org.uk

Some time later, the entrance was expanded and increased in height. Perhaps this was done because of the debris that had filled the base, which had been accumulating for... well, a very long time.

The National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh contains a large fragment of a vessel from this broch, probably found during the XNUMXth century clearance. It is part of a large turn-out rim vessel with a black outer surface and horizontal ridges along the inner surface of the rim.


Broch in Dun Carloway, Isle of Lewis

In general, it’s an interesting structure, to be sure.

But who would travel such a distance in order to look at... a stone tower - empty inside?

And the sea is cold... You can’t even swim there!

Note:
*The petrel or “storm swallow” is known for the fact that, according to legend, the soul of a drowned sailor lives in each such bird!
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    16 December 2023 04: 13
    “The house should be round! (c) – so that they don’t get killed because of the corner! laughing
    1. +4
      16 December 2023 06: 51
      Quote: ee2100
      “The house should be round! (c) – so that they don’t get killed because of the corner!

      But from above, it’s easier to throw a stone on your head, there are no corners.
      1. +5
        16 December 2023 10: 06
        Damn, what a smart remark! Have you noticed that the tower is truncated?
        If a person is standing next to a wall, you won’t be able to reach him with anything.))))
    2. +5
      16 December 2023 21: 51
      "The home should be round! (c)
      Funny, just in the spirit of Gauleiter Shpakovsky.
  2. +4
    16 December 2023 04: 30
    Perhaps he once had such a device inside!
    This reconstruction is painfully reminiscent of early feudal buildings, it remains to understand who cosplayed whom...
    PS. As a result of the latest update, the resource has become less user friendly.
    1. +8
      16 December 2023 13: 28
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      PS. As a result of the latest update, the resource has become less user friendly.
      But the bell was returned. Although it doesn’t work, it at least notifies.
      1. +8
        16 December 2023 14: 54
        But the bell was returned. Although it doesn’t work, it at least notifies.
        Works. You just need to click on it from a section other than the one in which the answer appeared, then it will lead directly to the answer.
      2. +2
        17 December 2023 17: 59
        Sometimes it works. Half the time...
  3. +14
    16 December 2023 04: 50
    A round dwelling, as opposed to a rectangular one, which has a larger windage, has less wind resistance, and in Scotland, located out to sea, this is doubly true. Exactly the same can be said about the round yurts of nomads, located in the open steppe and blown by the winds. In a round dwelling, you can light a fire in the middle and sit around it with the whole tribe...

    In the Caucasus, many fences are simply made of stone, on dry - ordinary masonry without any fastening mortar, and I was always surprised how during earthquakes this whole structure does not fall apart...
    1. +14
      16 December 2023 05: 16
      Hello everyone, thanks to Vyacheslav for the article!
      This, apparently, was the memory of our ancestors, the memory of round huts.

      That is, we do not believe in the existence of the primitive Pythagoras and Eclides!!!
      And so the picture is drawn: a primitive old man “architect” in skins is pulling a young colleague by the ear - again the son of a bitch is planning to smooth out a rectangular hut? To whom did I tell you to save material!!!
      No matter how a circle (sphere) has a maximum area (volume) with a minimum perimeter (surface).
      drinks
      1. +10
        16 December 2023 06: 25
        Yes, I think few people cared about windage, but the savings in material were even great. Most likely the walls are double to save money.

        But even with such an “optimized” design, quite a lot of labor was required.
        Considering the almost subsistence economy with a very low division of labor and productivity (who fed and clothed the builders?), most likely these were the “castles” of the richest and most influential families of that time.
        1. +10
          16 December 2023 06: 36
          Quote: VicktorVR
          Yes, I think few people cared about windage

          Until our ancestors' tails fell off, sailing didn't bother them at all...

          Quote: VicktorVR
          but the material savings are even very

          In Scotland, with its mountainous landscape, there was more material for building a home than there is now snow on the street...
      2. +8
        16 December 2023 06: 40
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        No matter how a circle (sphere) has a maximum area (volume) with a minimum perimeter

        It is unlikely that the ancient builders were guided by mathematical methods during construction. Most likely, the main thing here was the safety and convenience of the home. And perhaps the round dwelling also had some kind of sacred meaning for them...
        1. +2
          17 December 2023 22: 57
          Quote: Luminman
          It is unlikely that the ancient builders were guided by mathematical methods during construction. Most likely, the main thing here was the safety and convenience of the home.
          #

          What was in style was what the heads of the Scottish clans were worth.

          "Outlander" is a dramatic fantasy television series co-produced in the UK and the USA, based on the series of novels of the same name by Diana Gabaldon.
      3. +10
        16 December 2023 13: 33
        That is, we do not believe in the existence of the primitive Pythagoras and Eclides!!!

        Why not believe it!
        You can look at the line of the broch’s wall if you glance along it from the top to the foot. So a distant and wise voice is heard from the depths of thousands of years, saying, shouldn’t we calculate the geometry of the walls using the brachistochrone? So that when it rains, water slides down the fastest way?
        Well, it's a joke, of course wassat )))
        But, apparently, the ancient builders sensed something...
        Good day to everyone, dear friends!
        Good day to you too, dear Vyacheslav Olegovich!
        good drinks hi )))
        1. +3
          16 December 2023 14: 48
          Quote: depressant
          and you

          And all the best to you both today and tomorrow!
    2. +15
      16 December 2023 05: 32
      I was always surprised how during earthquakes this whole structure does not fall apart...
      The oldest construction method is dry masonry. Blocks not connected by mortar move during strong shocks, and when they pass, they return to their place. Not only fences were built this way in the Caucasus - various structures both in Europe and South America, built in a similar way thousands of years before the birth of Christ, still stand today.
      1. +13
        16 December 2023 06: 44
        Quote: not the one
        This is how not only fences were built in the Caucasus

        I remembered that my grandmother had a shed with various unnecessary rubbish, completely made of stone. Of course, without any solution. And she got it from her grandmother... wink
      2. Fat
        +13
        16 December 2023 10: 19
        Quote: not the one
        I was always surprised how during earthquakes this whole structure does not fall apart...
        The oldest construction method is dry masonry. Blocks not connected by mortar move during strong shocks, and when they pass, they return to their place. Not only fences were built this way in the Caucasus - various structures both in Europe and South America, built in a similar way thousands of years before the birth of Christ, still stand today.

        hi Good morning colleagues. A round house made of stone in the event of an earthquake also has the advantage that the masonry is continuous, without critical nodal weakening of the structure; anyone who has seen how the masonry of a brick house cracks when the foundation settles will understand immediately. In addition, there is a significant saving in material and, most importantly, labor. The qualification requirements for a builder are also not the highest (it’s still quite a long way from “free masons” smile )
        PS, and a bonus: additional wind resistance and the enemy cannot hide around the corner
        1. +1
          19 December 2023 19: 09
          Quote: Thick
          in the event of an earthquake it also has the advantage

          There should still be favorable diffraction of seismic waves on the ring-broch and poor resonance due to the large internal friction in the walls of the dry storage facility.
      3. +7
        16 December 2023 15: 03
        Blocks not connected by mortar move during strong shocks, and when they pass, they return to their place.
        More details from this point, please. Why would they suddenly return to their place, refuting the laws of dry friction? Another thing is that in a rigid structure a crack will form with a disruption of the connection from top to bottom, and a non-rigid one will simply become a little crooked and that’s it, enough for another 100 years.
        1. +7
          16 December 2023 16: 52
          “Why would they suddenly return to their place” - because the impact of an earthquake is not applied pointwise, but over the entire area of ​​the base/foundation. Carry out a basic experiment - build a small wall of 20 - 30 bricks, then carefully, so as not to collapse the structure, strike the entire area. After the structure is shaken, it will return to its original state. If there is any displacement of the bricks, it will be minimal.
          1. +1
            16 December 2023 19: 33
            strike across the entire area.
            Direction of impact? If from the bottom up, then this is one thing; if the fault passed under the building, and then uneven settlement of the soil occurred, then another, there will be a horizontal shift. Look at the deformation of railway rails after an earthquake, it clearly arises from lateral displacement.
            1. +7
              16 December 2023 19: 54
              On the issue of rails - a lone rail lying on the ground is not afraid of any earthquake. Even a pair of rails connected by sleepers. But kilometer-long tracks with sleepers covered with crushed stone will really twist. Let's come back down to earth a little. Any large structure located at the epicenter of a 12-magnitude earthquake will collapse. But something small, like a dog kennel, can survive due to the scale factor. It’s the same with houses built dry, without mortar - a small house during an average earthquake has a much better chance of surviving than one built of brick/stone but with mortar. And again, you must always take into account specific conditions - the soil, the foundation, the strength of the earthquake at a specific point, the height of the building, the thickness of its walls, the size of the building stone...
              1. +2
                16 December 2023 20: 09
                Even a pair of rails connected by sleepers.
                Initially, the question was considered whether the impact from below simulates a real earthquake. Obviously no, lateral displacement is always present. Therefore, a system without a rigid connection is unlikely to return to its place; in its best case, it will be slightly crooked. But with a rigid connection it will simply crack, and then whatever happens. The picture is an illustration of a “pair of rails”.
    3. +9
      16 December 2023 10: 39
      “There are a lot of fences in the Caucasus” - not only fences, but also houses were erected there without mortar, the cracks were simply covered with clay. It was the absence of mortar that made these buildings earthquake-resistant. The clay that crumbled after the earthquake was easily covered over.
    4. +2
      17 December 2023 18: 06
      A round tower is optimal in terms of volume of material (masonry). With the same brought stones, you can build a tower taller or thicker than a rectangular one. What is important for defense? And a rectangular dwelling is optimal in terms of the area of ​​placement of rectangular sleeping places in it.
      1. +2
        18 December 2023 02: 37
        It’s also more convenient to heat with a hearth (bonfire), there are no cold corners, heating is uniform everywhere, depending only on the distance from the hearth. The area of ​​the walls through which heat loss occurs is also minimal for a given volume of the room. So for a single building, the round shape is optimal.
        The same cannot be said about urban development, where building with round houses is not so convenient for social and planning reasons; there, often the wall of one house is also the wall of the neighboring one.
  4. +3
    16 December 2023 05: 15
    And what brought them there? A sad place.
    I wonder why they need a hollow wall, they could have made do with ladders
    1. +3
      16 December 2023 05: 30
      Quote: Tlauicol
      And what brought them there? A sad place.
      I wonder why they need a hollow wall, they could have made do with ladders

      Well, that’s what you think, but this place was a success among the local elite. Since the girls were available and the roast was served twice a day!!! drinks
      1. +8
        16 December 2023 13: 40
        Since the girls were available and the roast was served twice a day!!!

        Vlad, I laughed for a long time! Did they cook the girls into roast? wassat )))
        No offense, it's a joke. Tired of being gloomy. I was attracted to people.
  5. +3
    16 December 2023 05: 16
    And what brought them there? A sad place.
    I wonder why they need a hollow wall, they could have made do with ladders
    1. +9
      16 December 2023 06: 30
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Why do they need a hollow wall, they could have made do with ladders

      Thermal insulation possible
      1. +4
        16 December 2023 09: 26
        Quote: bya965
        Quote: Tlauicol
        Why do they need a hollow wall, they could have made do with ladders

        Thermal insulation possible

        Store potatoes laughing
  6. +6
    16 December 2023 10: 38
    The view from there is beautiful, downright “poetic”, so it could very well play the role of a watchtower.

    Or a lighthouse. The purpose of brochs has not yet been clearly determined. Some archaeologists generally believe that they did not have any specific purpose and in each case were built for a specific purpose.
    For example, the Mousa broch on the opposite, mainland shore of the bay, had a “twin”, which, however, was much worse preserved and today, to see it, you need to come close. And once upon a time these towers stood symmetrically on both sides of Mousa Bay and could well have played the role of landmarks.
    Unfortunately, the new functionality does not allow us to properly illustrate the comment, so a short explanation. The first photo shows a view of the Mousa broch from the opposite, mainland shore, where the twin “broch” was located. On the second - what is left of the “twin” today.
    1. +9
      16 December 2023 13: 48
      And once upon a time these towers stood symmetrically on both sides of Mousa Bay and could well have played the role of landmarks.

      Viktor Nikolaevich, couldn’t the brochs in this case serve, among other things, as signal towers? The enemy is approaching, a fire is lit on the roof, they see from a neighboring broch and also light a fire, and so on. And now the entire controlled area is alerted to someone’s approach. The speed of light is in any case greater than the speed of the messenger of bad news.
      By the way, this fact has been played out many times in historical films.
      1. +6
        16 December 2023 14: 31
        Theoretically, everything is possible. True, they are located somewhat too densely for signal towers.
        1. +2
          17 December 2023 18: 15
          Definitely defense structures
    2. +2
      16 December 2023 14: 59
      And once upon a time these towers stood symmetrically on both sides of Mousa Bay and could well have played the role of landmarks.
      Alignment landmarks? But then the watercraft must have goniometric instruments.
      1. +3
        16 December 2023 17: 20
        I'm not a navigator, but it seems that the navigational signs of the navigation alignment should be strictly on the line indicating the safe direction of movement. And here the line passing through the towers is perpendicular to this direction.
        1. +6
          16 December 2023 19: 40
          And here the line passing through the towers is perpendicular to this direction.
          Maybe they determined the center of the fairway in this way? When moving from the center, the angles become different, naturally, if the landmarks are at equal distances from it. It turns out to be too complicated, it’s easier to send a boy on a skiff with a measuring footpole so that he screams like the future writer Samuel Clemens “Mark Twain” in Mississippi! These structures were not navigational signs, they convinced me.
  7. +4
    16 December 2023 10: 53
    But then archaeological sites were discovered indicating that this was the creation of the Picts.
    ...
    It is believed that the earliest brochs were erected around XNUMXst century BC uh.

    Something doesn't fit. The history of the Picts begins with XNUMXrd century AD.
  8. Fat
    +7
    16 December 2023 10: 56
    Broch Moosa in the Shetland Islands, has a height of 13 meters.

    hi The fact that this broch is supposed to have a ceiling and an additional level is understandable, such a structure and so that there is a staircase and one light inside...
    Light. If the broch is a dwelling, a reasonable question arises, then how was it lit from the inside?... Not only the entrance and the hearth? therefore, the roof structure in the reconstructions appears questionable.
    1. +7
      16 December 2023 13: 56
      The article presents two reconstructions. The first is more logical, although the roof has no overhangs. This is unusual for us, since they always try to divert precipitation further from the foundation and walls. In the second picture, the roof overhangs are completely brought inside the walls and all precipitation falls inside the cavity of the walls, which is completely strange. Or there is a secret meaning that cannot be grasped (for example, a gallery at the top or the fantasy of a reenactor).
      I agree with your previous comment about the “roundness” of the construction. A structure that is round in plan is stable and can be more “organically” built in comparison with a rectangular one. The presence of two walls with a cavity reduces weight and material consumption. The ability to work together in terms of structural stability is ensured by internal horizontal connections between the walls.
      The taper of the walls ensures the overall stability of the structure. In general, such a system of building structures is very difficult and requires experience and skill.
      And, by the way, these double walls immediately give rise to memories of knightly romances with secret passages, eavesdropping and spying from secret rooms.
    2. +6
      16 December 2023 16: 54
      “how was it illuminated from the inside?” - torch.
      1. Fat
        +6
        16 December 2023 18: 47
        Quote: Sergey Valov
        “how was it illuminated from the inside?” - torch.

        hi Constantly running a full-fledged household by the light of torches, especially when it’s day outside, is difficult. The complete lack of daylight is not suitable for housing. A torch is a temporary measure, for the dark.
        PS In order to say something with confidence, you definitely need to know the purpose of the structure, and in its modern form, broch musa is more associated with a thermal power plant cooling tower and not at all with housing wassat Excuse me...
        1. +5
          16 December 2023 19: 09
          In principle, I completely agree with you! But there are more than enough examples of rooms without natural light in the good old days. By the way, it doesn’t remind me of housing either. Although... most of the economic activity can be carried out outside the broch, and it can be used mainly for sleeping. I understand that all this is speculation, the information is scanty.
          1. Fat
            +1
            17 December 2023 20: 01
            hi Greetings to Sergey.
            Quote: Sergey Valov
            Although... most of the economic activity can be carried out outside the broch, and it can be used mainly for sleeping. I understand that all this is speculation, the information is scanty.

            It is possible to provide normal daylight inside the broch! If you raise the roof above the wall on wooden poles to a height of, say, a meter and a half. You will get a kind of “light lantern” smile
            1. +2
              17 December 2023 21: 07
              This is possible, but only for the top floor, and it will still be dark and cold in winter. Using mirrors is a fantasy. We clearly don't know something.
              Remember the stories about our ancestors - they burned torches, the nobles - candles. And this was a little over 100 years ago.
              1. +1
                17 December 2023 23: 23
                I had a chance to visit the castle (estate), the first furniture of which was subsidized by 196.. and was located in the reception hall. This castle was built in the style of the Middle Ages, rectangular in shape. The round shape of the castle is most likely guided by considerations of the rapid construction of a fortification structure, which develops (under good conditions for settlement) into a castle-estate.
        2. 0
          20 December 2023 21: 53
          Quote: Thick
          Constantly running a full-fledged household by torchlight, especially when it’s day outside, is difficult

          Broch strongly resembles some specific agricultural structures - elevators and vegetable storage facilities. And, since they existed in turbulent times, they simultaneously performed the role of fortification.
  9. +3
    16 December 2023 11: 07
    But who would travel such a distance in order to look at... a stone tower - empty inside?

    You won't believe it, but this is one of the fairly popular tourist routes. Judging by the fact that from April to September a ferry with a capacity of 60 people regularly goes to the island, there are quite a lot of people there.
  10. +7
    16 December 2023 11: 11
    In the Bird's Eye View of the Broch, the remains of a square structure are visible at the top right. I wonder if it was built at the same time or not?
  11. +8
    16 December 2023 11: 30
    This, apparently, was the memory of our ancestors, the memory of round huts. “The home should be round!” - passed down from generation to generation,

    The round shape has one very important advantage. This is a maximum area with a minimum perimeter, and accordingly you need a minimum of material to enclose the necessary living space. Nomads knew this since antediluvian times, although they were not familiar with Euclid. During the transition to sedentarism, the traditional round shape gives way to a rectangular one. Corners, you know, it’s more convenient to divide furniture and comfort into rooms in a house. And protective towers or, for example, granaries remain mostly round for the same material-intensive reason.
  12. +9
    16 December 2023 12: 29
    The brochs' affiliation with one culture or another is currently pure speculation. But there is a clear similarity with the Sardinian nuraghes, which timidly date back to the Early Bronze Age..
  13. +10
    16 December 2023 12: 50
    And then they built their dwellings both from stone and from rods coated with clay, but they were always round. This, apparently, was the memory of our ancestors, the memory of round huts. “The home should be round!” - passed down from generation to generation, and on the island of Cyprus, in the settlement of Khirokitia, people have been building such houses for more than a thousand years.


    The round shape of stone buildings has a simple, logical explanation. Building a round building or structure from wood is inconvenient and expensive due to the large amount of waste. Round stone structures are more stable, simply because straight stone walls fall easily due to lack of support. The circle and arch create additional stability of the structure at minimal cost. The ancestors simply saved money and sought to create more reliable, sustainable structures.
  14. +7
    16 December 2023 14: 18
    build exactly round residential buildings. Moreover, in some places on the planet they are still preserved.
    These are the so-called brochs - round defensive structures of the early Iron Age

    So protective or residential? The difference is big, the requirements are different. Protective buildings were often built in a round shape; residential ones were round for a long time - a curiosity.
    As for the double wall and its shape, it most likely enhanced the strength of the structure, playing the role of a buttress - the outer and inner walls were connected by rigid, strong lintels, and closed at the top.
    A high, purely vertical wall, built without mortar, has a tendency to collapse, while the outer one propped it up.
    1. +7
      16 December 2023 17: 04
      “So protective or residential?” - the main difference between a residential structure and a combat structure is the height/number of floors and the thickness of the walls. For housing, it is optimal to build one or two-story houses with a large area. For combat towers, inaccessibility comes first - that is, thick walls, the height of the structure, the entrance on the second tier. Of course, it is also possible to combine functions, but as always, at the expense of some deteriorating at the expense of others. You can see all this beautifully live in the North Caucasus.
  15. +5
    16 December 2023 19: 40
    They lived in communities back then, so this flea was like a common repository for the winter, a refuge from everyone there.
  16. +2
    17 December 2023 11: 18
    I would feel uncomfortable in such a tall tower, built without mortar. If the walls are lower, that’s fine. Well, the wooden roof should fasten the upper edge of the wall and prevent it from collapsing.
  17. +1
    18 December 2023 14: 45
    To my shame, I learned for the first time about the existence of brochs. Thanks to the Author.

    IMHO, maybe the brochs were used like the burgs of Alfred the Great to organize centers of defense in the event of an invasion.

    Or they could have been castles of local feudal lords. Or vice versa, alien feudal lords...