The blockade of Kaliningrad - it will never be lifted

50
The blockade of Kaliningrad - it will never be lifted


Attempt number...


Lithuanian Railways will increase the tariff for freight transportation with Russia and Belarus to a “record” rate of up to 62%. This step, of course, is aimed primarily at further deterioration of economic conditions in the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation - both within the region and in terms of exports and imports.



This is far from the first experience of economic pressure on a remote region of Russia. There is no doubt that, fearing more severe excesses, our political and economic opponents seem to be checking the Kaliningrad region for red lines. Although of a slightly different kind than in Ukraine.

As is known, up to 80% of economic relations between the main territory of Russia and the Kaliningrad region are transit through Belarus and Lithuania. And from January 1, 2024, the Lithuanian freight railway operator LTG Cargo is raising tariffs for its services.

The increase in rates directly depends on the direction of transportation, however, the largest increase will be for Russia and Belarus - by 46–62%. LTG Cargo announces at the beginning of December 2023 that

“Taking into account the pre-announced rates of payment for the use of public railway infrastructure and the increased volume of cargo transportation administration procedures, the highest rates will remain for goods transported between Lithuania, Russia and Belarus. Tariffs for cargo transported to/from non-EU countries will change by 46–62%.”

At first glance, the argument seems to be neutral, but geographically it is quite specific. It is typical that for customers delivering goods within the country, tariffs will increase by only 5–10%, while for container transportation between major Lithuanian cities, railway tariffs remain almost unchanged.

The port of Klaipeda is Lithuanian, but essentially an enemy Memel


In addition, as for the rates “for the use of railway infrastructure for transportation through the Klaipeda port, they will change individually.” Moreover, it is explained that, for example, for clients “with long-term contracts, tariffs” will remain the same “as specified in the contracts.”


However, in all other cases the level of tariffs for Klaipeda “increases to 29%”. Taking into account such obvious tariff benefits for the Klaipeda port, it is reasonable to assume that Vilnius is thereby trying to direct cargo transportation through Belarus exclusively to this port. Accordingly, and in force since the early 80s. transbaltic ferry Lithuania - Germany (Klaipeda - German port Mukran).

However, the situation concerns not only the tightening of tariff policy on railways. By the end of November 2023, Lithuanian customs also significantly reduced the rate of truck passage from the Kaliningrad region.

Let us remind you that they proceed through the only checkpoint for freight vehicles - the Chernyshevskoye international checkpoint in the east of the Kaliningrad region (Kybartai - on the Lithuanian side). The queue of trucks on the “Lithuanian” border with the Russian region appeared at the end of the second ten days of November and has only been growing since then.

At the beginning of December, it grew to almost 200 cars, and the lag time from the reserved time in the electronic queue system already exceeds 113 hours. At the same time, Lithuania is not going to follow the example of Finland and completely close its border with Russia. Taking this factor into account, Vilnius’ indirect desire to force cargo carriers to “re-focus” on Klaipeda is also visible.

It is obvious that transit cargo transportation to Kaliningrad and the region, as well as in the opposite direction through Poland, is even more impossible. First of all, for foreign policy reasons. That’s why they were completely stopped back in the late 2010s – before the pandemic and before the SVO.

Transit is not a dogma


One way or another, there is only one of the options that change the geography of cargo flows with the Kaliningrad region. This is a more active development of ferry capacities between all ports of the Kaliningrad and Leningrad regions.


In addition, a response transit decision from Moscow and Minsk is quite possible: this is an increase in tariffs for cargo transit between Lithuania and the countries of Central Asia. Moreover, Lithuania’s trade with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for the period from the beginning of 2022 to the third quarter of 2023 cumulatively increased by more than a third.

Mutual freight transit between Lithuania and these countries has also increased noticeably – the increase was slightly less than 30 percent. In 2024, it is planned to increase these indicators by another 25–30% and at least 30%, respectively. These shipments are carried out both through Russia and Belarus, and the share of this direction in the mutual trade turnover of the former Soviet republics reaches almost 40%.

It is interesting that Russian and partially Belarusian fertilizers have been carefully removed from Western sanctions. And, if there had been a large terminal for transshipment and export of this product in the 70s. built not in Klaipeda, but in Kaliningrad, then the siege excesses would hardly have been possible at all.

Moreover, supplies of not only fertilizers, but any chemical products to Kaliningrad would be possible only through Lithuania. In this regard, we have to take into account the fact that since December 2023, the export transit of Belarusian chemical fertilizers through Klaipeda has almost stopped.

This was done, of course, at the request of the EU, and this decision deprived Lithuania, already rapidly impoverished, of up to 15% of annual budget revenues. This situation actually forces Vilnius to seek various kinds of relaxations of this ban.

Mantas Bartuska, head of the Lithuanian railway company Lietuvos gelezinkeliai, estimates losses from the termination of this transit at 60 million euros per year. For the entire Lithuanian chain of railways, ports and related infrastructure, Mr. Bartuska estimated financial losses at 100 million euros per year.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    7 December 2023 04: 03
    ***
    "Little country
    Little country
    Who will show me, who will tell me
    Where is she, where is she?"
    ***
    1. +6
      7 December 2023 10: 11
      This small country is doing big shit...
      1. +2
        8 December 2023 13: 07
        This small country is doing big shit...

        Russian proverb: the flea is small, but the bite hurts...
        1. 0
          11 December 2023 19: 00
          Truth teller. (ppp). On Friday at 13:07 -
          This small country is doing big shit...

          yours - "...Russian proverb: the flea is small, but the bite hurts..."

          This is for bad memory. how these bastards (Tribalts) pay for good - RI. USSR and RF. It is also not the ability to draw conclusions from the past. Remember never give YOUR GIFT away. GIFTS ARE NOT APPRECIATE. We remember about OUR - RF property (Nishtatsky world - Latvia. Estonia). Slaves DESIGNATE their demands. Better LATE. than NEVER, Least. for prevention, it is useful to demand YOUR own land and determine the PRICE for temporary RENT (min. for 30 years) + surcharge for DAMAGES. soldier
          R.S. Every "joke" has a SHARE of joke in it. hi soldier
    2. +1
      8 December 2023 22: 36
      It’s easy to compose verses while sitting on the couch in Uryupinsk. But for residents of the Kaliningrad region it’s not funny at all. Where it is, Lithuania, unlike you, we know very well and are drilling new holes on the belt, expecting the next increase in prices for ALL goods.
  2. +18
    7 December 2023 04: 49
    Strategic loss in the Kaliningrad region. they chatter about the imaginary losses of their enemies...
  3. +1
    7 December 2023 05: 29
    Europe's desire to fight Russia at its expense, at the expense of its problems is clearly visible... this is a strategy.
    What can the Kremlin's strategy oppose to this strategy?
    1. 0
      8 December 2023 20: 12
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      What can the Kremlin's strategy oppose to this strategy?
      Suwalki corridor?
      Psheks should not forget that the 2nd World War, although it was brewing, essentially began because of the Danzig corridor. And yes, then the Pshekians were given security guarantees by the great military powers France and Britain. Did it help a lot?
      1. 0
        10 December 2023 00: 27
        Quote: Nagan
        Suwalki corridor?

        Far away, Belarus will have to be connected.
        I vote for the return of Lithuania and the entire Tribaltic region to the rightful fold of the Russian World.
        "Over the Russian Vilnius, over the free
        Relatives crosses rise...". A.S. Pushkin.

        And in the Northern Black Sea region it’s time to resolve and end issues.
        Without delay and of course with Victory.
  4. +3
    7 December 2023 05: 35
    That is, as a result of the blockade of Kaliningrad, things got worse for the enemies, and things got better for Russia... smile
  5. +11
    7 December 2023 05: 40
    Well, what at the end? Complete blockade of the enclave? After all, everything goes towards this using the “salami” principle.

    Slowly but surely we are moving toward a difficult decision regarding the Kaliningrad region. When I wrote about the corridor, I was downvoted. Well, suggest a way out of this situation!

    But I think that you won’t get away with the Suwalki corridor here. The entire Baltic region must fall (be liberated). It won't work any other way. The choice here is simple and inexorable: either the Baltics are ours, or the enclave is not ours.
    1. +2
      7 December 2023 08: 03
      Quote: Stas157
      The entire Baltic region must fall (be liberated).

      And all of former East Prussia.
      1. 0
        10 December 2023 00: 30
        Quote: antiaircrafter
        And all of former East Prussia.

        What about the Russian city of Warsaw?
        And the entire Warsaw province?
        1. 0
          10 December 2023 10: 48
          Quote: bayard
          And the entire Warsaw province?

          May the regiments there prosper by the grace of God and the great Russian people.
    2. +2
      8 December 2023 13: 14
      The choice... is simple and inexorable: either the Baltics are ours, or the enclave is not ours.

      Absolutely right. One way or another, Russia will have to resolve the issue with the Baltic Sea, and resolve it the way it was done in the 1939th century. Sovereign Peter the Great, or as I.V. did it. Stalin in 1940-XNUMX, moving the Finnish border away from Leningrad.
      Only after the decision is it possible to once again repeat the mistake of the USSR in the tri-Baltic with the annexation of lands to it. All lands purchased by Peter I from Sweden must return to Russia as Russian lands.
      We will have to cancel the Bolshevik decree recognizing the independence of the Baltic states.
      1. +1
        10 December 2023 00: 35
        Quote: The Truth
        All lands purchased by Peter I from Sweden must return to Russia as Russian lands.

        There, lands were not only bought under Peter, but at the beginning of the 19th century Finland was also bought and remained part of the Empire until the Bolsheviks... Grandfather Lenin got excited then... and Comrade Stalin was in vain to regret Manerheim. The mistakes of the past must be corrected in the present.
    3. +1
      8 December 2023 20: 25
      Quote: Stas157
      The entire Baltic region must fall (be liberated).

      Do you even understand that this is automatically Article 5 of NATO and the 3rd World War?
      But there are a couple of options. The first is to offer America in exchange what it considers more valuable than three-balts. What exactly? In Soviet times, I would have said “Cuba,” but now I don’t see it so clearly. It is changing as administrations change in America and with them foreign policy priorities.
      The second option is to use soft power to bring pro-Russian forces to power in the Baltic states. Under Stalin, these were local communist parties, but now these forces still need to be found and painstakingly nurtured.
      1. +2
        8 December 2023 22: 40
        pro-Russian forces.
        They are not and will not be, because Russia has nothing to offer and in all respects, in the eyes of the Baltic states, Russia is losing.
        1. +2
          9 December 2023 08: 51
          Quote: Bolt Cutter
          pro-Russian forces.
          They are not and will not be, because Russia has nothing to offer and in all respects, in the eyes of the Baltic states, Russia is losing.

          Well, for example, local Russian-speaking people, who are oppressed there precisely because they are Russian-speaking.
          1. 0
            9 December 2023 11: 48
            local Russian-speaking people who are being bullied there
            The fact is that they are oppressed about as harshly as Russian speakers in the USA smile(they even allow you to buy and carry weapons). That is why, after 30 years, they live there as they always did and have no plans to leave.
            1. 0
              10 December 2023 00: 40
              Quote: Nagan
              Well, for example, local Russian-speaking people, who are oppressed there precisely because they are Russian-speaking.

              Well, that’s a great reason. And it’s even almost traditional. We must save our compatriots.
              Quote: Bolt Cutter
              they even allow you to buy and carry weapons

              That is, there will be no problems with weapons there??
              It's good .
      2. +2
        9 December 2023 08: 46
        Quote: Nagan
        Do you even understand that this is automatically Article 5 of NATO and 3rd World War?

        Do they understand this? We are simply left with no choice as to how to act one way and not another.
        1. 0
          10 December 2023 00: 42
          Quote: Stas157
          We are simply left with no choice as to how to act one way and not another.

          We are simply led to this choice, and at a time that is inconvenient for us (according to their calculations).
  6. +3
    7 December 2023 06: 42
    This decision deprived Lithuania, already rapidly impoverished, of up to 15% of annual budget revenues.
    It suffers losses, but still takes various hostile steps towards Russia and will continue to do so. According to the principle - if you didn’t do a mischief to Russia today, then the day will be lived in vain. We have been too lenient in recent years towards the “tricks” of the Baltic states and it was Kaliningrad that was holding us back - the fear of its blockade. But in the end, this is where everything goes. We won't do it by chance, but under pressure from the Anglo-Saxons, the EU will achieve this. It is not for nothing that there are calls to close the Baltic Sea to our country and other hostile plans. Of course, we don’t know what is planned in response to this on our part, but we want to believe that a worthy answer will be found.
  7. +7
    7 December 2023 06: 56
    I don’t understand what’s sad? Cargo transportation to Kaliningrad must go by sea - transporting cargo by sea has always been MUCH cheaper! But, as the author rightly said, raising their tariffs with Central Asia will be a trick; they can’t go around Russia by sea laughing
    But in general, it’s time to throw these Triboltian Extinctions into complete isolation, in general a complete break, incl. at the diplomatic level, with the recall of embassies - they are still of no use
    1. +5
      7 December 2023 07: 15
      Quote from Bingo
      Cargo transportation to Kaliningrad must go by sea

      Can our Baltic Fleet provide a reliable and safe supply regime in the Baltic Sea (including for military cargo)?

      transporting cargo by sea is MUCH cheaper

      The delivery shoulder there is not large. And you also count the transshipment of goods by sea (short route), which does not need to be done if you use railways. Sea transport must be taken from somewhere... And why should some Baltic states give us a choice about how to supply our enclave?
      1. +3
        7 December 2023 07: 43
        This is something new, which means unloading a container from a ship is transshipment, but not from a railway platform?
        In terms of security - they will not openly pirate the norm - this is not the Gulf of Aden, everything is clear. And there, besides the Navy, the Air Force will provide security, they have a 5-minute flight, and no suicide bomber will dare to show off here.
        So everything is fine, I say - arrange COMPLETE isolation for them - at the same time we will close the hole on the border through which ukro-terrorists travel, like the murderer Dugina or they recently arrested the attacking A-50 at the airfield - they also got through Triboltika.
        1. +2
          7 December 2023 08: 01
          Quote from Bingo
          So, unloading a container from a ship is transshipment, but from a railway platform is not?

          But the prices are different. Try to follow both routes. On one there is the usual direct railway track. On the other round timber there is a railway route to Ust-Luga, transshipment to sea transport, a sea route to the enclave, there again transshipment to a railway platform. Do you feel the difference? If you look at the cargo turnover of the Kaliningrad port over the years, it is not growing, but even falling. Economics dictates the rules of the game.
    2. 0
      8 December 2023 22: 42
      Tariffs can be raised, but half of all cargo returns back to Russia. This creates a boomerang effect. This is unacceptable for the Russian Federation. We will suffer ourselves. Apart from threats about breaking through the Suwalki corridor, we have no other arguments.
    3. 0
      12 December 2023 01: 40
      Before actively expressing your position, open a geographical map.
  8. +7
    7 December 2023 07: 46
    That is, America is to blame for everything. Europe, Baltics? Only in Soviet times I was proud of our Foreign Ministry, but now why do we need this old Armenian? And where did the “genius” of foreign policy go?
    1. 0
      7 December 2023 07: 55
      That is, America is to blame for everything. Europe, Baltics?
      And we? “We are not financiers in anything or anything. What kind of evidence is there?” (c) KhF “Red Heat” smile
  9. -1
    7 December 2023 07: 46
    That is, America is to blame for everything. Europe, Baltics? Only in Soviet times I was proud of our Foreign Ministry, but now why do we need this old Armenian? And where did the “genius” of foreign policy go?
  10. 0
    7 December 2023 07: 57
    If we had not been deceived by our partners, and now not friendly countries, it would have been easier. smile
  11. +5
    7 December 2023 08: 28
    regarding cargo from Belarus to the Klaipeda port, before Lukashenko almost fell from the second chair, he brazenly drove Belarusian goods from Belarus to the Klaipeda port, although in the Russian Kaliningrad region ports in Kaliningrad and in the new port of Pionersk were waiting for Belarusian goods, with no worse infrastructure than in the Klaipeda port. Yes, even in Baltiysk. And the distance from Belarus to Klaipeda and Kaliningrad is the same. By the way, the road from Belarus to the ports of St. Petersburg and Ust-Luga itself is not much longer, with the infrastructure of the latter much more modern and better than the port in Klaipeda. And since Russian Railways could provide very serious tariff discounts for Belarusian goods, in the end it was even cheaper for Lukashenko to transport cargo from Belarus to St. Petersburg and Ust-Luga than to Klaipeda. So there are no problems for Belarusian goods getting to ports in the Baltic, just don’t fidget two chairs and payment for the transit of Belarusian goods, to feed the NATO country.
    As for Russian cargo from Kaliningrad to the “mainland” and from the “mainland” to Kaliningrad, there are only two routes. Or the Suwalki corridor, or an intensive ferry service, including railway crossings from Kaliningrad, Baltiysk or Pionersk to St. Petersburg. But since the EU is bleeding from the nose, the RiaBaltika railway project connecting Warsaw and Helsinki is driving it. then new railways The tracks in the Baltic states are laid at European, not Russian, railway widths. ruts So, under this noise and for EU money, Lithuania can change the railway route to the Kaliningrad region through its territory to the narrow European gauge. In any case, Russia needs to quickly complete the North Military District victoriously with the unconditional surrender of its enemies, and then these headaches about the isolation of the Kaliningrad region will disappear on their own. Who dares to bark at the winners then...
    1. 0
      7 December 2023 19: 54
      “he brazenly drove Belarusian goods from Belarus to the port of Klaipeda, although in the Russian Kaliningrad region there were ports waiting for Belarusian goods in Kaliningrad and in the new port of Pionersk”

      He brazenly drove... It's beautiful, honestly. At your own loss. Yeah. Russia brazenly raises its mash. production, as well as agriculture, bringing direct losses to surrounding countries. The same Belarusians will be happy to close the Russian markets for these positions.
    2. 0
      12 December 2023 01: 42
      Everything is said beautifully. Just one problem. There is no port at all in Pionersky.
  12. -3
    7 December 2023 08: 48
    Siege of Kaliningrad

    The whole “Yaroslavna’s lament” makes sense in a sovereign country; in the colonies it remains to carry out the scenarios of the white overseas master
    1. -5
      7 December 2023 14: 39
      Quote: Vladimir80
      The whole “Yaroslavna’s lament” makes sense in a sovereign country; in the colonies it remains to carry out the scenarios of the white overseas master

      My friend, are you healthy? I'm worried about you wink laughing
  13. -1
    7 December 2023 09: 03
    Quote: north 2
    about cargo from Belarus to Klaipeda port


    so Belarus “invested” in the Klaipeda port, and after that the Lithuanian railways charged Belarus a high tariff and he was forced to ask for a “place” in Ust-Luga
    1. +2
      7 December 2023 09: 41
      So who forbade Belarus from “investing” in the port in Ust-Luga? Just don’t blah blah about the fact that Russia, while building a modern, powerful port in Ust-Luga, was against Belarusian investment in this port. When the rooster pecks at the soft sirloin for a hot bite, then run to Russia, -Russia-ratui! Moreover, without any apologies for practically supporting a strategic NATO facility, which is Lithuania itself and this Klaipeda port.
      1. +2
        7 December 2023 20: 00
        When will Russia make “all sorts of apologies for practically supporting NATO’s strategic object”—namely, trade with Ukraine, which has been going on since 2014, with daily shelling of the DPR and LPR? Or is it possible for Russian oligarchs to do business with blood? Only them, no others? Why should godmothers work hard? Wouldn’t it be better to turn into godfathers for yourself?
  14. 0
    7 December 2023 09: 34
    We need to actively think about how to strangle these baltotrophs...
  15. +1
    7 December 2023 16: 03
    Allocate land to your father in the Leningrad region for a port for 50 years free of charge and the problem of Belarusian supply will be solved. And for some reason the problem with Kaliningrad is one-sided, we don’t have leverage on these frostbitten people at all, or are ours, as always, relying on the brains of the Europeans?
  16. -3
    7 December 2023 20: 02
    "for further deterioration of economic conditions in the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation.."
    That’s why everyone who is friendly with the head says that the NWO should end at the border with Poland. In order to subsequently exchange part of Western Ukraine for a land corridor to Kaliningrad.
    But in general, again, who cares, if they raise our tariffs, then we should raise them too. If everything has already been raised for the Baltic states, then it means raising it for the EU. These Baltic six are still messing with us with the consent of the EU. So let the EU pay for them.
  17. -2
    8 December 2023 00: 36
    The Kaliningrad region is an “unhealed wound” on the “body” of Russian logistics... The Baltic republics + Poland are whipping up an atmosphere of political psychosis around this enclave and everything connected with it, testing Russia’s patience... I think it’s time to look at this problem from the outside from a different “angle” of view using other and unpopular “recipes” for improving the situation around the Kaliningrad region... Poland+Lithuania+ Latvia+ Estonia is a “cancer” of NATO AND the EU... And our (Russia’s) attempt to “treat them with homemade means", the last 30 years, through "drug therapy", in the form of political concessions and economic preferences, relying on the principles of good neighborliness and political expediency - did not produce results... Consequently, the only option remains - "surgical intervention" But this is in the plan the next and very necessary SVO.... Humanly speaking, I feel sorry for the “patients”, but you have to pay for everything, especially if you fundamentally refuse drug therapy...
  18. +1
    8 December 2023 05: 02
    Swap with Poland: Lviv for Suwalki.
  19. +1
    8 December 2023 11: 33
    As I already wrote, the only adequate solution is to build up and develop our maritime cargo transportation. Whether we like it or not, relying on land for an exclave is always vicious and is always dependent on neighboring states. And addiction is always bad.
    In the future, we would have to put a stop to any economic affairs with the Balts altogether. Deprive them of this profit and if it becomes critically important for them, sign everything that interests us in strict connection with what interests them. Link mutual benefits so to speak.
  20. 0
    8 December 2023 13: 00
    The ferry is a temporary crutch; the area will be blocked, because it has already been marked.
  21. 0
    12 December 2023 01: 58
    No matter how many articles I read and how many officials at different levels I don’t listen to, a COMPLETE MISUNDERSTANDING and/or IMITATION of misunderstanding of this problem is clearly visible. The blockade always took different forms. Now it’s just intensified. And the main culprit for what is happening is ourselves as a country that cannot protect its region. Over the past 30 years, there is a locomotive and a small cart of our decisions and regulations, which aggravated the situation even before the start of the SVO. The main thing that reassures us is the understanding that the issue will be clearly resolved after the victory in Ukraine. It won't last long.