Rumyantsev's war with Turkey

25
Rumyantsev's war with Turkey
D. Khodovetsky “Battle of Cahul”


So, during the Seven Years' War, the young general Pyotr Rumyantsev already proved himself to be a great commander.



After the death of Elizabeth Petrovna, he was appointed commander of the Russian army, which, together with the Prussian corps allocated by Frederick the Great, was to attack Denmark in order to return the occupied possessions of Peter III - Schleswig and Dithmarschen. Possession of these lands allowed Russia to control the Danish Straits. And only after the liberation of these provinces, Peter III promised Frederick the Great to return East Prussia and Koenigsberg to him - not immediately, someday - if the permanent unrest “in Europe” suddenly disappeared.

However, the position of Catherine, who did not have the slightest right to the Russian throne, was so precarious that after the murder of her husband, she did not dare to insist on fulfilling the terms of the agreement with Frederick and gave him East Prussia without any conditions. Russian troops almost fled, abandoning already equipped warehouses with fodder and provisions, and this is very reminiscent of the “flight” of the Russian army from the territory of the former GDR under Yeltsin.

And Pyotr Rumyantsev at that time was no longer a commander - he resigned when he became convinced of the veracity of the news about the death of the legitimate Emperor Peter III. Rumyantsev also really disliked Catherine’s all-powerful favorite, Grigory Orlov. He “reciprocated,” and therefore it seemed that the military career of the hero of the article was over.

However, in January 1763, he suddenly received a letter from Catherine, in which she asked him to return to service. And in 1764 he was appointed governor-general of Little Russia. Rumyantsev held this position until 1781 and did a lot for the full integration of these lands into the empire.

On the eve of a new war


It must be said that Catherine II cannot in any way be called a great strategist. The numerous wars that our country waged during the reign of this empress - with Turkey, Sweden, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth - always began unexpectedly for St. Petersburg and at the most inopportune moment. And only the valor of the Russian soldiers and the leadership talents of their commanders redeemed the diplomatic failures of Catherine II and her ministers. The hero of our article became one of these “rescuers” and “cleaners”.

Ottoman Turkey was dissatisfied with the results of the last war of 1735–1739, in which the Russian armies of Minich and Lassi won a number of victories and greatly devastated the Crimea, seriously undermining the military capabilities of this vassal khanate to the sultans.

The results for the Russians turned out to be very modest - just the return of Azov and recognition of the title of empress for Anna Ioannovna, but revanchist sentiments at the court of Sultan Mustafa III were very strong.

In addition, the international situation seemed favorable. On February 29, 1768, the anti-Russian Bar Confederation was formed in Poland, and in March, King Stanislav Poniatowski was forced to ask his former mistress, Catherine II, for help.

And the Confederates were supported by France and Austria. These states were allies of Russia in the Seven Years' War, and Grand Duke Peter Fedorovich (the future Emperor Peter III) then tried in vain to explain to his aunt Elizabeth that a war against Prussia in alliance with these countries not only does not meet the interests of Russia, but harms them:

“The Austrians are bribing us, and the French are deceiving us... we will eventually repent that we entered into an alliance with Austria and France.”

That is exactly what happened.

The French sent Charles Francois Dumouriez to Poland, who began serving during the Seven Years' War and received 22 wounds in just one battle with the British at Klosterkamp. It was Dumouriez who in 1768 developed a plan to capture Corsica, for which he received the rank of colonel - and therefore Napoleon Bonaparte, born in 1769, turned out to be a French subject. In 1770, Dumouriez arrived in Poland and actually led the military forces of the Confederates, but was defeated by Suvorov.


Portrait of Dumouriez by Rouillard

Let's say a few more words about this man.

In revolutionary France, Dumouriez became minister of foreign affairs and was instrumental in declaring war on Austria. Leading an army, he defeated the Austrians at Valmy, and then, after the victory at Jemappes, captured the territory of modern Belgium - his name can be found among the names of prominent French commanders under the Arc de Triomphe in Paris.

Dumouriez's adjutant was the future Napoleonic marshal Etienne Jacques Alexandre Macdonald. However, then Dumouriez decided to send his army to Paris to restore the constitutional monarchy, but did not receive support from the troops and fled to Austria in April 1793.

In addition to helping the Polish confederates, the French also pushed the Porte into a war with Russia in every possible way, generously financing the Sultan, bribing viziers and providing enormous assistance in the reorganization and training of troops, modernization of fortifications and artillery.

The French also provided assistance to the mysterious impostor - “Princess Tarakanova”, who, in their opinion, was supposed to lead a corps of Polish and French “volunteers” in Constantinople and, having gone to the front, appeal to the Russian army to come over to its side. However, False Elizabeth only managed to get to Ragusa (Dubrovnik), where she settled in the house of the French consul.

The British (Russia's opponents in the Seven Years' War!) rendered Russian the fleet all possible assistance in his movement from the Baltic to the Mediterranean Sea. And three British diplomats did their best (as if they were their own) to help Alexei Orlov in his hunt for “Princess Tarakanova.”

The English envoy in Naples, William Hamilton (husband of the famous mistress of Admiral Nelson), not only refused the adventurer money, but forwarded her letter to the English consul in Livorno, John Dick, so that he would give it to Alexei Orlov, whose squadron was based in this city. From that moment on, the impostor was doomed - Alexey Orlov always achieved his goal.


Performance of the Mossovet Theater "The Tsar's Hunt", 1977: Margarita Terekhova as Princess Tarakanova and Leonid Markov as Alexei Orlov

But the impostor ran out of money, and her creditors simply did not let her leave Rome - so that she could go to a meeting with Orlov, the debts of “Tarakanova” were paid by the English ambassador in this city, Jenkins. And the consul John Dick, already familiar to us, gave shelter to False Elizabeth in Livorno. And then the British received a ship in Plymouth with the captured rival of Catherine II, knowing full well that she was on board.

The damned question arises again: why and why an enslaving and extremely unprofitable agreement was concluded with Austria, because of which, in the Seven Years' War, Russia was forced to fight against Prussia and England, who then wanted peace with our country, and even on the side of such treacherous and hypocritical “allies” "?

Let's return to Polish affairs.

The Confederates also turned to Ottoman Turkey for help, promising to give up Volhynia and Podolia.

The territories that the Poles were going to transfer to Turkey - Volyn (2) and Podolia (5):


Historical regions of Ukraine

This generosity was the last straw that pushed Sultan Mustafa III to enter the war with Russia.

Rumyantsev's war with the Ottoman Empire


The new (already the fifth) Russian-Turkish War, which is sometimes called the Rumyantsev War, began in 1768.

It was during this war that the Russian squadron of A. Orlov and G. Spiridov burned the Turkish fleet in Chesme Bay - June 24–26 (July 5–7), 1770. And the expression “Chesme disaster” even appeared in the Turkish language (just as the word “Berezina” entered the French language).

And during this war, Suvorov won his first high-profile victories. Since 1769, with the rank of brigadier, he fought in Poland against the troops of the Bar Confederation, winning victories in the battles of the village of Orekhovo, Landskrona, Zamosc and Stolovichi, and captured Krakow Castle.


In Schubert's engraving, French officers give their swords to Suvorov during the capitulation of Krakow

It all ended with the first partition of Poland.

Austria then received Galicia - 1 square meters. km and 509 population.

Prussia annexed Western Prussia without Torun and Gdansk - 660 sq. km and 600 population.

Russia got eastern Belarus - 1 square meters. km and 693 population.


The first section of Poland

But this was, as they say, just a test of strength. Only in 1773, Major General Suvorov was transferred to Rumyantsev’s 1st Army, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

A detachment of Haidamaks-Koliyas and their allied Cossacks, pursuing the Confederates, crossed the borders of the Ottoman Empire and attacked the cities of Balta and Dubossary, where the Poles tried to take refuge.

Russia, as, alas, often happened in its history, turned out to be unprepared for a new big war - after all, our country just recently emerged from the unnecessary Seven Years' War, in which its regular troops suffered heavy losses. The First Polish War continued, which was also not without losses. The Russian regiments had not yet been properly replenished, and the recruits who replaced the veterans were not properly trained.

In an effort to avoid conflict, Russian representatives, in the presence of the Turks, physically punished the perpetrators of this incident. However, this did not satisfy the Ottomans: they put forward a deliberately impossible condition - demanding the death penalty, which was abolished in the Russian Empire.

Having received a refusal, the Turks broke off relations with Russia: on September 25 (October 6), 1768, the Russian ambassador A.M. Obreskov was imprisoned in the Seven Tower Castle, and on October 29 (November 10) an invasion army began to form. At the same time, the army of the Crimean Khanate, a vassal of Turkey, attacked Little Russia.

In Russia, two additional recruitments were carried out in the fall of 1768. In addition, Catherine II approved Alexei Orlov's plan to send a squadron of ships of the Baltic Fleet to the Mediterranean Sea to try to raise an uprising of Christians on the Balkan Peninsula.

The beginning of hostilities



Russo-Turkish War 1768–1774 on the map

Three Russian armies were formed on the territory of Little Russia.

The main importance was attached to the First, whose commander was appointed General-in-Chief A. M. Golitsyn. It was intended for action against the Turks, and was to be joined by the Third Army of General Olitz. Rumyantsev became commander of the Second Army, which was supposed to protect the southern borders from the Crimean Tatars.

The fighting began in January 1769, when the Khan's army attacked Slavyanoserbia and the Novorossiysk province - this raid was the last for the Krymchaks. The Russians responded by occupying Taganrog and gaining free access to the Sea of ​​Azov.

In April, Golitsyn’s main army crossed the Dniester and approached Khotin, but due to the lack of siege artillery, it soon retreated to Podolia. Rumyantsev went to Elisavetgrad (Kropivnitsky) in May. The Turks, in turn, having crossed the Danube and Prut, tried to cross the Dniester, but were driven back by the vanguard units of Prince Prozorovsky. Golitsyn again besieged Khotin - and again unsuccessfully.

Dissatisfied with his actions, Catherine II sent him into retirement; ironically, Golitsyn received this order just at the moment when the Turkish army had already been driven back to Iasi and the Ryabaya Grave, and Khotin capitulated.

Rumyantsev was now appointed commander of the First Army; he handed over the Second Army to General-in-Chief P. Panin, whose son would become one of the organizers of the conspiracy against Emperor Paul I.

In the same year, the First Squadron of Russian warships left Kronstadt for the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, and Vice Admiral Senyavin in Voronezh began to form the Don (or Azov) flotilla. The troops of the opposing sides retreated to winter quarters, but the 17-strong cavalry corps of General Shtofeln carried out a successful raid on Moldavia and Wallachia, which ended with the capture of local anti-Russian rulers, and then at the beginning of 1770 defeated the Turks at Focsani and repelled their attack on Bucharest and Giurzha.

By that time, Rumyantsev’s character had changed significantly for the better, and he himself was taking measures to restore order and tighten discipline.

This case was described in the 1st issue of the Russian Archive magazine for 1863:

“In the camp, an order was made even earlier so that everything and everyone would be ready every minute, so that everything unnecessary would be sent out of the camp, and the officers would have with them only the most necessary things. This seemed very shy to the officers. According to the legends of that time, many maintained comfort even in camp life...
It was difficult to wean the barichs of that time from lordship. Down jackets and dressing gowns were constantly being fiddled with. When traveling, some carried a metreska with them...
The hardest part was dealing with the dressing gowns. No matter how much it was forbidden, those who loved to pamper themselves, albeit secretly, still did not lag behind the dressing gowns.
And then one day Rumyantsov, early in the summer morning, leaving the tent (it was in July), noticed some careless officer who was making his way somewhere between the tents in a dressing gown. Rumyantsov called him over.
The poor officer, seeing the Commander-in-Chief, was completely lost: but Rumyantsov encouraged him with kind words, entered into a conversation with him, and about completely foreign subjects. Having walked a few steps together, the encouraged officer wanted to take time off to go to his tent.
“Where are you in a hurry, my friend,” answered Rumyantsov, “it’s still quite early, come to me, I want to talk with you again.” There was nothing to do, we entered the tent of the Commander-in-Chief, who continued the conversation, also affably, and invited his guest to sit down.
It was necessary to obey, but the guest’s embarrassment intensified: he was completely confused in his speeches and blushed, too feeling the burden of the robe on his shoulders, while the commander-in-chief was dressed as he should.
The conversation continued, and every time the officer tried to leave, Rumyantsov held him back: sit, sit, Mr. Officer, you see that it’s still early, I’m alone and I’m bored; and your company gives me pleasure.
Time passed, and finally, various generals and other persons began to appear in the tent, with reports, all in full uniform; and there is only one guest in a dressing gown, and the commander-in-chief still continues to hold him, with the same affection.
He barely, barely managed to finally escape home.”

Loud victories of 1770


In 1770, the First Russian Army went on the offensive, first forcing the combined forces of Turkey and Crimea to retreat from the Ryabaya Mogila, and then on July 7 (18) Rumyantsev won his first major victory - at Larga (the left tributary of the Prut River). Russian troops were 2 times inferior in number to the Crimean-Turkish ones, commanded by Khan Kaplan-Girey (38 thousand versus 80 thousand).

Here Rumyantsev for the first time built troops not in one large square, but in several mobile ones (“divisional”), which made the Russian system more maneuverable. Having thrown back the Tatar cavalry, the Russians went on the offensive and overthrew the enemy, losing only 90 people killed (enemy losses - up to a thousand people).

Two weeks later, Rumyantsev’s army near the Cahul River entered into battle with the troops of the Grand Vizier Khalil Pasha. The balance of forces was simply indecent (about 20 thousand Russians opposed a 150 thousand enemy army, and in the rear there were also 80 thousand Tatars), and Rumyantsev actually found himself in the position of Peter I during his Prut campaign.

Instead of going into full defense, the Russians crossed the Trajan Wall and attacked the Turkish camp themselves. Separate squares were headed by generals Bruce, Baur, Repnin, Olits and Plemyannikov, and artillery pieces were placed in front. It seemed that the Turks had a chance to win when a selected 10-strong Janissary detachment struck Plemyannikov’s division and broke through the ranks, capturing two banners. Rumyantsev had to personally stop the fleeing soldiers.

And then Khalil Pasha, with a saber in his hand, unsuccessfully tried to stop his army, which was also attacked by its allies - the Kurds, who began to shamelessly rob the fleeing Turks.

Russian losses amounted to about one and a half thousand people, Turkish losses - up to 20 thousand.

The defeat of the Turks did not end with this: after 2 days, the vanguard units of Baur overtook the Ottoman army at the crossing of the Danube and completely defeated it. On the other side of the river, the vizier was able to gather only 10 thousand people - the rest simply fled.

In honor of the victory at Cahul, a commemorative medal was issued, and Rumyantsev received the rank of field marshal.

Later, A.S. Pushkin would call Rumyantsev “the Perun of the Kagul shores.”


Medal "For the victory at Kagul"


Vulcanesti. Monument in honor of the Battle of Cahul


Kagul obelisk installed in the park of the Catherine Palace

In 1776, when, accompanying Grand Duke Pavel Petrovich, Rumyantsev found himself in Prussia, Frederick the Great staged maneuvers at which episodes of the Battle of Cahul were played out, and the Russian field marshal was awarded the Order of the Black Eagle.

Soon after the victory at Kagul, Russian troops occupied the fortresses of Izmail and Kilia.

But the garrison of the Brailov fortress held out until the beginning of November; during this siege, the Russians lost more people than in the Battle of Kagul - about two thousand people. Despite the high-profile victories, Rumyantsev never crossed the Danube that year. But in August 1770, he compiled the so-called “Rite of Service.”

And Panin’s Second Army was also not idle: after a two-month siege, on the night of September 15-16, the well-fortified fortress of Bendery was taken by storm: the Turks lost up to 5 thousand people killed, about 11 thousand surrendered.


V. Slobodzinsky. The beginning of the assault on the Bendery fortress in 1770

The losses of Panin’s army also turned out to be very large, about 6 thousand people were injured, 1 died.

And on June 24–26 (July 5–7) of the same year, the Russian squadron under the command of Chief General Alexei Orlov and Admiral Grigory Spiridov destroyed the Ottoman fleet in Chesma Bay.


Battle of Chesma, diagram


Y. F. Hackert “The Death of the Turkish Fleet in the Battle of Chesme”

The Turkish minister Resmi Efendi in his notes put Alexei Orlov on a par with Pyotr Rumyantsev, calling both great commanders of Catherine II. He wrote about the defeat of the Ottoman fleet:

“All this is one of those rarities that historians call hodise-i-kubra, a great event, because they go out of the order of the nature of fate and happen three centuries ago.”

And Baron Tott, a French agent in Constantinople, reported to Paris:

“The padishahs are in lively anxiety, the ministers are dejected, the people are in despair, the capital is in fear of famine and invasion. This is the present situation of the empire, which one month before considered itself so formidable.”

In the next article we will continue and finish the story about the Russian-Turkish War of 1768–1774, and also talk about the new appointments of Pyotr Aleksandrovich Rumyantsev and the last years of his life.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    6 December 2023 04: 33
    Thank you, Valery!

    It’s impossible to imagine a repeat of “Princess Tarakanova’s” successes of False Dmitry.

    However, the ending is somewhat similar.

    Impostors, thieves and stripped of their hair.
    Nightingale whistle and prison.
    1. +8
      6 December 2023 05: 32
      Hello, Sergey!
      I’ll add on my own behalf - the winners write the conclusions!
      Thank you Valery for continuing the cycle!
      Good day comrades, best regards Vlad!
      1. +7
        6 December 2023 05: 46
        Hello Vladislav!

        It's like that. Only over a long period of time do opinions about the winners change. And radically.

        Try to create a dynasty. Yes, and it will be replaced somewhere along the way.
      2. +12
        6 December 2023 06: 34
        There is another good quote about this:
        “History is written by the winners, so it does not mention the losers.” ©
        I join in thanking the author for an interesting and beautifully illustrated story.
      3. +5
        6 December 2023 08: 03
        Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
        Hello, Sergey!
        I’ll add on my own behalf - the winners write the conclusions!
        Thank you Valery for continuing the cycle!
        Good day comrades, best regards Vlad!

        Good afternoon, Vladislav! hi
        What are the conclusions - most (if not all) of history is written by the winners! Yes
        The case of Paul I is no exception! Yes
        Have a nice day, everyone! hi
  2. +8
    6 December 2023 05: 32
    A listing of familiar events from childhood, with dubious comments from the author.
    1. +6
      6 December 2023 08: 19
      familiar events from childhood

      What a disappointment: Rumyantsev, it turns out, after all, won at Kagul and Larga, Alexey Orlov burned the Turkish fleet and caught Tarakanova, and Suvorov defeated Dumouriez and the Bar Confederation. smile
      And you were hoping...
      I offer my sincere condolences
      laughing
      1. +4
        6 December 2023 08: 39
        Yes, and the Turks still don’t sell for less than 100 thousand.
        1. 0
          6 December 2023 15: 50
          Quote: Cartalon
          Turks still don’t sell for less than 100 thousand.

          Write more, why should their bastard feel sorry for them!
          P.S. The phrase, by the way, is attributed specifically to Rumyantsev)
          1. +2
            6 December 2023 16: 45
            And also Suvorov and Miloradovich
  3. +4
    6 December 2023 06: 31
    she did not dare to insist on fulfilling the terms of the agreement with Frederick and gave him East Prussia without any conditions.
    Catherine wasted both the Danish Straits and East Prussia. And if Peter III had remained on the throne, the Danish Straits would have been ours, and Prussia would have been on Russia’s errands. According to the author’s strong opinion. laughing
  4. +6
    6 December 2023 09: 23
    And only after the liberation of these provinces, Peter III promised Frederick the Great to return East Prussia and Koenigsberg to him.
    One thing is confusing, the withdrawal of Russian troops from East Prussia began under Peter III, after the conclusion of the St. Petersburg Peace Treaty of 1762, and there are no conditions in the agreement that East Prussia will be returned after the war with Denmark. It was suspended after the coup, and then continued. As for France and its influence on the events described in the article. Polish events. Do not forget that France had its own interests in Poland, the father-in-law of King Louis XV of France, Stanislav Leszczynski, lived in France. Relations between France and the Ottoman Empire. France, the only country in Europe that has had friendly relations with the Ottomans since the XNUMXth century, the goal of France’s relations was Egypt, which it staked on back in the XNUMXth century, during one of the crusades. France sought , weaken the influence of Russia in the European arena and Turkey. How did it end? Napoleon landed in Egypt, to ensure logistics, occupied the Ionian Islands and Malta.
    1. +3
      6 December 2023 09: 42
      father-in-law of King Louis XV of France Stanislav Leszczynski

      Was he the one who managed not to wake up when a spark from the fireplace set his clothes on fire? And enter the list of historical figures who died the most ridiculous deaths.
      1. +5
        6 December 2023 10: 01
        Yes, he died so absurdly. And he entered the list. But he was never able to return to the Polish throne.
  5. +5
    6 December 2023 09: 24
    And only after the liberation of these provinces, Peter III promised Frederick the Great to return East Prussia and Koenigsberg to him.
    One thing is confusing, the withdrawal of Russian troops from East Prussia began under Peter III, after the conclusion of the St. Petersburg Peace Treaty of 1762, and there are no conditions in the agreement that East Prussia will be returned after the war with Denmark. It was suspended after the coup, and then continued. As for France and its influence on the events described in the article. Polish events. Do not forget that France had its own interests in Poland, the father-in-law of King Louis XV of France, Stanislav Leszczynski, lived in France. Relations between France and the Ottoman Empire. France, the only country in Europe that has had friendly relations with the Ottomans since the XNUMXth century, the goal of France’s relations was Egypt, which it staked on back in the XNUMXth century, during one of the crusades. France sought , weaken the influence of Russia in the European arena and Turkey. How did it end? Napoleon landed in Egypt, to ensure logistics, occupied the Ionian Islands and Malta.
  6. +7
    6 December 2023 10: 17
    Many thanks to the Author, who once again proved that his talent for describing events is much higher than his views on the role of some individuals.

    For example, the Author constantly talks about the shortcomings of Catherine 2 as a leader.

    “And only the valor of the Russian soldiers and the leadership talents of their commanders redeemed the diplomatic failures of Catherine II and her ministers.”

    That is, under Catherine 2, many senior positions were occupied by talented people, about whom the Author writes. But whose merit is this, if not the one who appointed them? Isn't it Catherine?

    Rumantsev was “in opposition,” but Catherine did not take this into account.

    In my opinion, Catherine’s talent for choosing smart people is generally recognized, which, in fact, was once again brilliantly proven by the Author.
    1. +3
      6 December 2023 11: 33
      In my opinion, Catherine’s talent for choosing smart people is generally recognized, which, in fact, was once again brilliantly proven by the Author.

      Perhaps the most important thing that Catherine II and Elizaveta Petrovna possessed was the ability to hear.
      Peter III, Paul I and Nicholas II surrounded themselves with people who were not stupid, but they heard their advice every now and then.
      The same Peter III had immediately and pedantically (in German) begun to implement Minich’s proposals, then it is not yet known how this “chat” would end.
      My personal opinion (I have an equally good attitude towards Peter III and Catherine II and a completely negative attitude towards Peter II and Nicholas II) - Catherine the Great turned out to be more Russian in the history of our patronymic than her husband. In fact, it turned Russia to the South - the zone of centuries-old conflict between the steppe and forest. It was during her reign that the natural border of our country in Europe was formed. Everything gutted later: Finland, Poland, Georgia - gone. Alas, today we are fighting for these natural boundaries for the Russian world. Moreover, paradoxically, the subject of the dispute between Frederick and Elizabeth (East Prussia) is ours, but our original lands of Little Russia, the Chernigov, Sumy, and Kiev regions are not ours.
      It's sad and unclear...
      1. +4
        6 December 2023 11: 40
        completely negative towards Peter II

        But this is a boy! Unlike Nicholas II. He was only “listed” as the emperor for now. What could he do at that age? Remember Ivan the Terrible in childhood, how he was pushed around by the boyars until he grew up. It is unknown what Peter II would have become 5 years later if he had not died.
        1. 0
          6 December 2023 17: 54
          He was only “listed” as the emperor for now. What could he do at that age?

          This is my personal opinion, however, as history shows, everything can be ruined in three days. My attitude towards Peter II is limited by the framework from the beginning of his delinquency until his death. As a person it is certainly a pity, but the country plunged into a dynastic crisis is even more so. The absence of the extreme feeling of “don’t break what was done before you” is frightening.
  7. +10
    6 December 2023 11: 53
    Possession of these lands allowed Russia to control the Danish Straits.

    Yes. And also the English Channel and Gibraltar on Fridays! laughing
    It is clear that Geography is “not a noble science,” but can you look at the map? request
    In general, some logistical benefits could be extracted from Schleswig-Holstein. For example, to build the Aider Canal earlier, thereby severely cutting Danish revenues from the Sound tax. And this is quite possible at the technological level of that time.
    But I can’t predict political problems feel
    The British (Russia’s opponents in the Seven Years’ War!)

    Actually no)) stop
    Russia not only did not fight with England, but did not even break off diplomatic relations.
    But in general, the situation when yesterday’s enemies turn out to be friends and vice versa is quite typical for politics. Therefore, there is absolutely no need to wring your hands and exclaim something pathetically.
  8. 0
    6 December 2023 12: 08
    Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
    In my opinion, Catherine’s talent for choosing smart people is generally recognized, which, in fact, was once again brilliantly proven by the Author.

    Perhaps the most important thing that Catherine II and Elizaveta Petrovna possessed was the ability to hear.
    Peter III, Paul I and Nicholas II surrounded themselves with people who were not stupid, but they heard their advice every now and then.
    The same Peter III had immediately and pedantically (in German) begun to implement Minich’s proposals, then it is not yet known how this “chat” would end.
    My personal opinion (I have an equally good attitude towards Peter III and Catherine II and a completely negative attitude towards Peter II and Nicholas II) - Catherine the Great turned out to be more Russian in the history of our patronymic than her husband. In fact, it turned Russia to the South - the zone of centuries-old conflict between the steppe and forest. It was during her reign that the natural border of our country in Europe was formed. Everything gutted later: Finland, Poland, Georgia - gone. Alas, today we are fighting for these natural boundaries for the Russian world. Moreover, paradoxically, the subject of the dispute between Frederick and Elizabeth (East Prussia) is ours, but our original lands of Little Russia, the Chernigov, Sumy, and Kiev regions are not ours.
    It's sad and unclear...


    The words attributed to Alexander 2 could probably have been altered by Catherine 2:

    “Dad was a genius, and he only needed diligent performers, and I am not a genius, like Dad was - I need smart advisers!”

    As for positively - negatively, I have approximately the same attitude towards the emperors - Catherine, Alexanders 1 and 2, Elizabeth - these are in the pros, Nicholas - both in the cons, I can’t evaluate Peter 1, I haven’t figured it out yet, he has too much stuff. The rest are so-so.

    By the way, the problem of the Southern access to the sea, which Peter never solved, was solved by Catherine.

    I can’t say anything about the natural borders of Russia - perhaps everything is very sad if the fate of the rest of the European empires awaits us. A national state within its natural borders has not yet been formed.

    As for “it’s not clear” - I have an opinion, but the code must be respected...
  9. +1
    6 December 2023 12: 48
    Quote: Senior Sailor
    But in general, the situation when yesterday’s enemies turn out to be friends and vice versa is quite typical for politics. Therefore, there is absolutely no need to wring your hands and exclaim something pathetically.


    Gold words. In politics, IMHO, in general the words “friend” and “enemy” either have a special meaning or are simply inapplicable. Moreover, both externally and internally.
  10. BAI
    +2
    6 December 2023 14: 09
    Rumyantsev for the first time built troops not in one large square, but in several mobile ones (“divisional”), which made the Russian system more maneuverable.


    Transition from Macedonian phalanx to Roman cohorts
    Battle of Chesma, diagram

    Where's the diagram?
  11. +1
    6 December 2023 17: 36
    Comrades, I’ll be honest: I looked at the title and was wary that this was “the work of the Samsonov brothers.”
    But no, this is Valery.
    According to the article, it will be necessary to re-read and update in my head the knowledge about that period
  12. +2
    6 December 2023 21: 30
    Thank you for the article. Valery, correct the diagram of the Battle of Chesme