New site functionality - Blacklist

Many commentators often encountered the problem of the impossibility of normal communication in comments with some site visitors. There are also some comrades who abuse personal messages. Apparently, if it is impossible to prove their case in the comments, they simply start to get personal messages, and often with insulting words. In order to further avoid such nuances, a new Black List module was created.
The “black list” is not common, for each it is its own personal. When adding a visitor to an emergency, he does not see your comments, you are his. Neither he nor you can send private messages to each other.
How to add a user to the "black list"?
In the comments click on the account - the name of the person you want to make in your emergency.

A pop-up window will appear. Click "Add to blacklist".

Then, in the same way, you can delete from an emergency, click "Unblock user".

You can see your personal emergency in the "Personal Account".

This is how it looks:

You can also delete a user from it by clicking "Delete", opposite a blocked account.

Comments

[Atlon]

Maybe someone needs it, I do not need it. Hiding from opponents is not mine! I prefer to kill them morally! :)

[Rezun]

I support and approve of Vsh approach. On the other hand, in the presence of a "lack" of criticism, you become "soft and fluffy" in your own eyes.

[El13]

Like me (see profile)
If it works as stated - convenient in some cases of pathological addictions, I have not yet needed.

[Hauptmann emil]

On the one hand, can anyone really get a thread for spam, for example. Personally, no one has ever written letters to me with insults, etc.

Quote: Rezun

On the other hand, in the presence of a "lack" of criticism, you become "soft and fluffy" in your own eyes.

Similarly, I think what can lead to this. And if someone sends letters all in a row, then everyone will "minus" him and that's it.

[Jin]

This is a normal topic, but I hope it will not have to be used, but let it be better than not.

[panda]

Killer, change your nickname then

[Krylovets2000 (HVVKU)]

I support comrade !! This is not our way! Better ban is public contempt! (I understood this at the school) So sho, I think, you should not get down on Dermoratic rails ....

[in reserve]

I don’t mind, let it be, sometimes people can’t cope with the emotions overwhelming them. But there are people who in life without conflicts cannot, creating a conflict, they get a discharge from this. So let it be.

[NEMO]

Quote: in stock

I don’t mind, let it be, sometimes people can’t cope with the emotions overwhelming them. But there are people who in life without conflicts cannot, creating a conflict, they get a discharge from this. So let it be.

The most faithful comment " + "

[Lord of the Sith]

I think the so-called "ignore" was done correctly. It's not obligatory, who needs to use the button. But in general, moderators regularly clean here, I did not observe such that there was a boorish commentator and he used his insolence for a long time. For a maximum of a day, such a subject exists and then it is closed.

[wax]

I think that the law on the media is enough. Personally, I will always find what to answer to any commentator, although, perhaps, also on the verge of a foul. There is a simple way - just do not notice: the vacuum around the insolent or evil troll, I think, is sobering. In addition, there is a minus. So I consider such reprisals against uncomfortable and even hostile unpleasant commentators unnecessary.

[Che]

Criticism is normal, rudeness is unpleasant. Why spoil the aura for yourself. I think this module is normal. There is nothing wrong with that.

[wulf66]

In general, I have nothing against the emergency, often people, for lack of arguments, begin to bluntly be rude. Stupidity in any form is unsightly and annoying, and it’s too late to correct the mistakes of upbringing.

[vladsolo56]

if someone needs it then let it be, you never know

[GHG]

Maybe it’s worth it ... sometimes someone else’s rudeness inflames, and wants to answer in the same way, or even twice as much. Normal, adequate people crush with arguments. Thank God there are most of them. And trolls are temporary, today alone, and tomorrow different Nick. I hope this function I do not need.

[Bort radist]

Let it be, for those who do not have nerves, it’s better to send them to the black list than to where else.

[El13]

Ne tell me, it’s more pleasant to send "somewhere else", so adrenaline rush in my soul ... and then immediately in his emergency situation ... lepotaaaa

[Cavas]

When adding a visitor to an emergency, he does not see your comments, you are his.

Vadim!
In my opinion is it too much ??
How is it not to see his comments, while others see?
So a troll or an opponent can calmly add all appropriate posts (objectionable nicknames) to the black list and write whatever he wants.
And only God knows how much he has enough imagination !?
At the same time, you will not be able to refute or confirm his arguments.
Certain "communities" or "squads" can be created and they will only communicate with each other.

Not him, not you cannot send personal messages to each other.

Here, I think everyone’s private affair, if you want to block, if you want not.

[Smirnov Vadim]

For moderators and admins, this function does not work, that is, they see all comments.

The purpose of the troll - swearing in the comments! Meaning troll when you do not respond ...

[Cavas]

Quote: Smirnov Vadim

The purpose of the troll - swearing in the comments! Meaning troll when you do not respond ...

It’s clear with trolls, but what about if we have different views on this or that event?
I was blocked, I do not see his posts, but he is mine and "having fun" with might and main and that's it?
It also happens that I am wrong and now she is a "magic wand", blocked the unwanted and again "have fun" - no one interferes!

[Smirnov Vadim]

You do not read carefully - your comments also do not see ...

[Cavas]

Quote: Smirnov Vadim

Your comments also do not see ..

I got it.

Vadim, I suggest that if I blocked, then even if I don’t see, but if I was, then I would like to see it and answer. and let him not see for himself.

And to hide a person in the sink or not is his own business!
Something like that!?

[Nicholas C.]

They wanted the best, but it turned out as always.

You must be able to analyze the project before implementation.

Bandera this list is closed from enemies. When he needs it, he opens it, temporarily removes it from the black list and settles accounts, then closes again.
If we introduce something, then with equal rights, so that, at least from memory, Bandera could be brought into the emergency. And so they got on the contrary much more opportunities to conduct their policies here.

[Smirnov Vadim]

I looked at your logs Nikolay S. - nobody under the nickname Banderovets mined you, in general, the latest changes in your rating were - 2012-12-15 12: 24: 12, even before the introduction of an emergency.

Now the question is Why did you write this comment, for what purpose?

[Nicholas C.]

Someone not with a nickname, but with the worldview of "Bandera" minus me then. Therefore, I lost interest in this site even earlier than 12.15.12. Now, after the mailing about the emergency situation, I went here and made sure that I cannot enter it into this emergency, because, apparently, he did it earlier. Now I have no opportunities at all, and now the "marshal" can, when he needs to take me out of his list, and do what he wants, seeing from the answers that I have appeared.

So who is this innovation for?

For me, as I understood the situation, it only got worse. It would be correct if not only both sides did not see each other, but also were blacklisted on both sides. One brought - without the consent of both can no longer be removed.

Bandervu I know. Having received an opportunity to attack from an ambushwill work with redoubled zeal. Well, nothing, we will resist Svidomitism where there are no your troubles.

[Smirnov Vadim]

Quote: Nikolai S.

that I can't bring it to this emergency, because, apparently, he did it before

- fix it.

Quote: Nikolai S.

Well, nothing, we will resist svidomizmu where there are no your problems

- and this is your right, we do not hold anyone by force ... Only I did not understand what kind of Bandera is it?

[Nicholas C.]

Quote: Smirnov Vadim

this is fixable.

Thank. This, after all, will not only be necessary for me.

Quote: Smirnov Vadim

But I still do not understand what kind of Bandera is it?

I had troubles with Kars. Yes, this is not so important. There are enough of them. With the rest, I just did not have time to talk.

[Kotleopold]

Maybe I joined the discussion a little late or I am not catching up with something, but talk about Kars as a visitor with a "Bandera" outlook ... Sorry, but this is from the realm of fantasy. The real Bandera - you really believe my previous experience - will salivate, proving its "Moscow-communist" essence.

But in essence the topic ... All relations associated with insults in PM are decided by a simple ignore of the opponent’s messages. Nobody forces you to read them. Well, in the comments, the moderator should catch the mice on time.

[bask]

Quote: Cavas

It’s clear with trolls, but what about if we have different views on this or that event?

Hi Seryoga. That's the one and that ... This lifesaver is for cowards. Who can’t express his opinion in the eyes of an opponent ... On a patriotic site, there shouldn’t be such a thing .. My purely personal opinion.

[Cavas]

Quote: bask

Hi Seryoga.

My regards.

Quote: bask

This stick is a lifesaver for cowards

Well, as always, you are straightforward!
Well, at least I did not name them!

Quote: bask

On a patriotic site, it should not be like that.

I support, if somewhere or someone is wrong or right, let him prove in a fair fight, and not build the Chinese wall.

[Cthulhu]

I agree with Cavas, a trick with the invisibility of each other's comments, in my opinion. But the blocking of drugs is probably necessary. Don't judge biasedly about "probably"). I just did not receive such "gifts", so I cannot judge the degree of infection.

[anchonsha]

Neither for nor against the BLACK LIST. Therefore, I will support the opinion, as the most acceptable, colleagues of Cavas - you want to add it to the list, or you can not.

[Cavas]

Quote: anchonsha

Cavas colleagues - if you want to add to the list, but you may not.

This is good, but if you brought me ???
Here is the question, so the question ???

Another example, purely abstract: the guys from Israel don't like it. what the guys from Smolensk write, but the guys from Smolensk do not like the guys from Samara and what we (or rather the administration) sees on the branch, some "squads". who support each other, that is, the "community".
And where is the salt of the struggle, the plot and denouement, where are the arguments for and against?
Where is the flight of fantasy of some individuals? He blocked me and I don’t see his opuses or compilations, I have nothing to object to or object !?

I propose another lock, if you block, then you don’t see, but if they block you, then you see, and he (the blocker) let himself live peacefully!

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

the guys from Israel don't like it. what do the guys from Smolensk write, And where is the salt of the struggle, the plot and denouement, where are the arguments for and against?
Where is the flight of fantasy of some individuals?

When there is a controversy, this is normal, but when it comes down to xenophobia, insults, rudeness and simply anti-Semitism - this is a completely different conversation and I understand why it annoys many. Prove your opinion in civilized ways and no one will bring you to the emergency.

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

When there is a controversy, this is normal, but when it comes down to xenophobia, insults, rudeness and simply anti-Semitism - this is a completely different conversation and I understand why it annoys many.

Again 25.
Yes, you will only touch the "screeching" of the entire site - they offend, we are the best, and you "drove us" here, etc. You quickly slide down to the topic of anti-Semitism, your example is proof of this.

Quote: atalef

Prove your opinion in civilized ways and no one will bring you to the emergency.

This is a threat?
You can start to enter now!

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

This is a threat?
You can start to enter now!

not understood ? What was it ? \

but you just touch the "screeching" on the whole site - they offend, we are the best

. I already wrote that for some reason anyone writes about the selectivity of the Jews, but not the Jews themselves. If you want to exercise in this, I would rather not see these opuses.

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

I would rather not see these opuses.

Simple as that, tell me how?

Quote: atalef

I already wrote that for some reason anyone writes about the selectivity of the Jews, but not the Jews themselves.

Once again confirms your and my post above.

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

but if they block you, then you see, and he (the blocker) let himself live peacefully!

Do you practice it in full, without any fear of getting an answer? (Of course you are not specifically you)

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

Do you practice it in full, without any fear of getting an answer?

And how do I know if he blocked me or not?
Let him not block, but be responsible for his posts!

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

And how do I know if he blocked me or not?
Let him not block, but be responsible for his posts!

Why know? The less you know the better you sleep. Only if suddenly (I think) your (fierce opponent) disappeared, and friends (whom you can always chat with) continue to see him, then you do not need to have seven spans in your forehead to understand. Through intermediaries you can always write off, find out the relationship in PM and come to a compromise (if it hurts, then someone has blocked it. This is an option. But in fact, you just need to behave in a civilized manner.

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

But in fact, you just need to behave in a civilized manner.

I have a question, are you a teacher?
Or is it to teach everyone in your blood?
Or do you think. that we are not civilized?

[bask]

Quote: Cavas

n because he blocked me and I don’t see his opuses or compilations, and I can object

I will read and report what I have read, inform via Skype. You dictate, I will write on your behalf. In short, complete .... confusion. The guys from Israel have already riveted, a long black list, black list. !!!!! How without polemics with them.

[Cavas]

Quote: bask

The guys from Israel have already riveted, a long black, black list. !!!!

Vadim, here is an example for you.
First, the "squad" is gaining weight, inside the enclave, so to speak (while blocking all the unwanted ones).
Then it unlocks them one by one and starts pressing!
Moreover, the "squad" can "press" any opponent who is unwanted or does not agree with their opinion.
How do you like this development course ???
But is it possible or is it already even directed by someone ?!

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

First, the "squad" is gaining weight, inside the enclave, so to speak (while blocking all the unwanted ones).
Then it unlocks them one by one and starts pressing!
Moreover, the "squad" can "press" any opponent who is unwanted or does not agree with their opinion.
How do you like this development course ???
But is it possible or has it already been directed by someone?

Not interesting, normal civilized communication is more pleasant and fruitful.
As for the squads, this is nonsense, who needs it? People on the forum communicate and argue, it doesn’t come to killings.

Quote: Cavas

But is it possible or is it already even directed by someone ?!

As always, conspiracy theory. It can just behave respectfully towards the opponent and no one will blacken you (here is such an interesting verb drawn)

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

People on the forum communicate and argue, it doesn’t come to killings.

Then why block the post, you want to block yourself, but I do not want!

Quote: atalef

It may just behave respectfully towards the opponent and no one will blacken you (here is an interesting verb drawn

Well, "blackening" me is difficult, if not impossible!
And as for respect, they don’t work with hair dryers, everyone talks as they can, they don’t like the opponent, don’t communicate, what questions?

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Cavas

First, the "squad" is gaining weight, inside the enclave, so to speak (while blocking all the unwanted ones).
Then it unlocks them one by one and starts pressing!
Moreover, the "squad" can "press" any opponent who is unwanted or does not agree with their opinion.
How do you like this development course ???

Hi Seryoga Well, let's make them a war Stars against skulls First time or what? and how long will they last against us?

[Cavas]

Quote: Ruslan67

Hi Seryoga

Ruslan, good afternoon.

Quote: Ruslan67

Well, let’s arrange them the Star War against the skulls. The first time or what? and how long will they last against us?

Yes, it will not. :
Only here is how you will arrange it, if they blacklist you and you will not see their posts?

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Cavas

Only here is how you will arrange it, if they blacklist you and you will not see their posts?

Well, if they arrange a brawl, then we don’t need a light bulb. And to press someone in, they will have to unlock you and then it's easier to lay out a list of those who are rushing at you and there are all kinds of people who can tell them the place. You won’t put them on the black list

[Cavas]

Quote: Ruslan67

there are all kinds of people who can tell them the place

Your words to God in the ears!

[Ruslan67]

Well, even though I'm a big boy but I continue to believe in the best and in common sense so victory will be ours

[Pinochet000]

I honestly don’t know, it can only be limited to private messages

[Cavas]

Quote: Pinochet000

I honestly don’t know, it can only be limited to private messages

Support!

[chehywed]

I honestly don’t know, it can only be limited to private messages

Yes, perhaps the best option.

[Bort radist]

Quote: Pinochet000

I honestly don’t know, it can only be limited to private messages

I agree, the ostrich pose is not our option.

[atalef]

Normal function, you forgot that there are a certain number of trolls who do not argue with you and do not oppose, but simply stupidly minus, here you need to protect yourself from such ones, especially since it is not a problem to calculate them. Maybe the emergency will somehow reason them

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

who do not argue with you and do not oppose, but simply stupidly minus, here it is necessary to guard against such ones, especially since it is not a problem to calculate them

Now they’re minus you, can you determine who?

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

Now they’re minus you, can you determine who?

When you get constants from the same thing - you know exactly who

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

When you get constants from the same thing - you know exactly who

And you are not a prophet, a minus can be put by a person passing by, and who wants to play against your opponent.

[FID]

I can’t, I just see the number of minuses and pluses. About the emergency. I have some figures in PM obscene, but this is too much. After all, the larva appears in soap. To bring boors in the emergency, and not, albeit uncomfortable, albeit holding unacceptable views, but not rude, interlocutors - this, I think, is the main opportunity to protect yourself from rudeness.

[Cavas]

Quote: SSI

I have some figures in PM obscene, but this is too much.

Against PM I have nothing against, only for, but here. to not see posts ????

Sergey, another example:
"Nastenka" or whatever she writes that the F-22 is the best plane in the world. and you have your own opinion on this and it (the opinion) of a professional, but here's the trouble "Nastenka" blocked you and you do not see her posts!
What to do?
F-22 best aircraft ????????

[atalef]

Quote: Cavas

professional, but here's the BADGE "Nastenka" blocked you and you do not see her posts!
What to do?
F-22 best aircraft ????????

By blocking your opponents, you first of all deprive yourself of communication. Therefore, they will block (I think) only for rudeness, and it’s enough not only in PM, but also in comments. There should be some kind of restraining factor for boors. A warning from administrators is clearly not enough.

[Cavas]

Quote: atalef

Blocking opponents first of all deprives yourself of communication.

In an enclave with others, how can he rob himself?

Why, without fear of sin,
Does the cuckoo praise the Rooster?
For praising the Cuckoo.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Cavas

but here's the trouble "Nastenka" blocked you and you do not see her posts!

Hi Sergey, Nastya is in the bath, her comments are deleted. If someone like that writes crap, everyone will bring it to the emergency, then to whom will she write? I’m not in Kaif myself.

[Cavas]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

hello, Sergey

Sasha, my respect!

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Not myself in Kaif

And if this is a group of people?
What is there to be?

You saw her posts and saw that the people are new, but some have already supported her.
So what prevents them from uniting, not you, not me, we won’t know about it?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Cavas

And if this is a group of people?

Sergey, well, a few seropagonists will make a circle and a jester with them. They will compliment each other and kiss the United States and all that. Who needs these clowns, they won’t prove anything, they’re a dream for geiropa, and Bandera is a hero. communicate with them.

[Cavas]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Sergey, well, a few seropagonists will make a circle and a jester with them

Sanya, what can I say, if the site administration has decided so, then what can we do?
They decided so they decided ..... why then all this to discuss?

[atalef]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Sergey, well, a few seropagonists will make a circle and a jester with them. They will compliment each other and kiss the United States and all that. Who needs these clowns, they won’t prove anything, they’re a dream for geiropa, and Bandera is a hero. communicate with them.

Alexander You are 100% right.

[koosss]

Although I didn’t have such a problem, such a function should be, because any unbalanced always enough. This is a kind of ignore, and it should be in places where intensive Internet communication takes place, just in case

[ISRAEL]

It's nice to see that the site is developing.!

[savarineko]

I don’t see any need, because in order to ignore the opinion of a person, no special means are needed IMHO

[tan0472]

Take it for you, the administrator of the entire site Vadim Smirnov. I have long expected this great mercy from you. For I repent - I am lazily angry, and therefore your useful curiosity will save the darkness of good time, until the village wasted on reading epistles from various filthy monsters. But monsters come across zelo regions are mischievous and light-minded. I thank the gracious sovereign.

[Robin_3ON]

And I will not (probably) block anyone, I am interested in reading comments. And for those who can’t convey their thoughts culturally or not their own, I try not to pay attention. Yes, and I write rarely read more and rarely put cons, only +

[anchonsha]

The polemic seemed to be from nothing ... But no, and probably, the work of admins is needed here - to choose the pros and cons from the essence of all sensible comments and, if necessary, put up for discussion. We will discipline ourselves and learn to live with different views.

[old rocket man]

I THINK THAT WOLVES TO BE AFRAID -DON’T WALK IN THE FOREST, and whoever wants to-let them use it, for those who are most interested in rating, I think getting a sensible minus from a coward is an honor

[terp 50]

I need it. ,, Defense ,, from rudeness.

[MG42]

You can’t respond to rudeness appropriately, because you yourself will automatically violate the rules of the forum, and in PM you can be too lazy to waste time. In general, for = only there is a flaw = can the user add both the administrator and the moderator to his black list?

[gribnik777]

Maybe for the faint of heart it's good. But personally, I try to teach myself to be restrained, to respect the interlocutor (oh, how hard it is sometimes to do this, and it does not always work out). Better to wait, calm down before answering.
The most difficult thing is to defeat yourself, not to clench your fists.
It turned out - so you won. In my opinion, we must strive for this. If you want to engage in self-education, then there will be less rudeness.

[Aleksey94]

Function is needed. There are on many sites. It will not be superfluous, but it will be useful to someone.

[MG42]

The more functionality = the better, you can use this function, or you can not = there is a choice. I am for.

[Gray-haired71]

I think this list of emergencies does not hurt .. because there are individuals. Who also love to write nasty things in PM. I For

[Kars]

Purely for fun I tried ---- anyway, the comment can be seen in the last comment section,))))

And it would be interesting to see who YOU ​​blacklisted.

[Ruswolf]

I think that order is individual disregard for rudeness, without prejudice to the interests of other users, are quite acceptable.
Each person has the right to make decisions at his discretion in each individual case, what to do, without involving others in a personal conflict.

But there are two sentences
1. Possibility of the perpetrator for rehabilitation, through the administrator - on the principle of one message with an apology, within 5 days one answer - yes or no.
2. Repeat this survey of users about emergencies in 3 months. So, as now we are discussing what they explained to us, but then, it will be necessary to discuss what we used.

[suharev-52]

Let's see how it will work. But the idea itself is not bad. I personally fully support. Sincerely.

[oldmen1973]

Why not, maybe someone will come in handy. The most important thing is such an innovation, as I understand it, it is not imposed as mandatory by the rest - you want to use it, you want not. Admins are trying to improve something - well, honor and praise be to them.

[Bresh]

Common practice. +

[Pushkar]

Each forum has its own rules. This is no worse and no better than others. Although personally I do not want to hide my head in the sand.

[WW3]

Useful thing. Everything is working.

[Bykov.]

" Black list ".
The thing is definitely necessary, but I hope it does not come in handy!

[avreli]

1. The idea is good.
2. Is it possible to create a “white list”? That is, in a certain section indicate the list of users whose opinion is interesting, and see the material and only their comments.
3. Well, add a switch button: clicked - the full discussion opened, clicked - the discussion collapsed and only the comments of the preferred users were left.

[Komsomolets]

Hiding is really not a pleasure. Let's see how it will work.

[raf]

In my opinion, the commenting is not needed, otherwise the whole point of the discussion is lost! (moderators should be punished by boors) But blocking private messages can come in handy! (so that the boors would not get it)

[Normal]

When I received a message from Smirnov, I thought the function was useful, but I didn't need it. I am in the comments (sometimes I answer, but first - no, no), and even more so in a personal, not rude, I have no time to flood. It happens that I am accused of trolling, well, it happens, but not for self-interest, but for the benefit of; sometimes you have to exaggerate some things to make the problem look more "convex" So it seems like blacklists are not for me. But!

Quote: Atlon

Hiding from opponents is not mine! I prefer to kill them morally!

Here is the first example - a moral killer! Do I need to communicate with him? The question is rhetorical ... Let's go further:

Quote: Ruslan67

Well, let's arrange a war for them. Stars against skulls. Soldier. First time or what? and how long will they last against us?

Quote: Cavas

Yes, it will not. : drinks
Only here is how you will arrange it, if they blacklist you and you will not see their posts?

Here is the second example - "a gang of marshals-2" Comrades really want to "lower" an unwanted opponent, and they certainly want to do this in a group of one (he himself got into such a minus one), but here such a bummer It's a shame, yes?
So the functionality is very useful. And by the way, you do not have to wait until the moderator descends and calls to order notebook flooders. Those are known and their absence in the discussion is only good.

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Normal

"gang of marshals-2" Comrades really want to "lower" an unwanted opponent, and they certainly want to do this in a group of one (he himself got into such a minus one), but here is such a bummer

Everything was waiting - who will voice it and it turned out to be you! Only it’s not the matter of you. You have robbed us of the minuses for the posts in our common swara, and nothing more, and everyone has already forgotten about it. Now imagine how a group of Nastyushas are sucking in a fuel hose from f35 and none of the normal people except the moderators can scam them because they do not see them And how it will look for those who will go to the site for the first time

[Normal]

Quote: Ruslan67

Imagine how a group of Nastush sucks in a filler hose from f35 and none of the normal people

I did not meet the group Nastya, probably lucky ....
But even with the help of the black list it was impossible to get rid of your "group". Your leader quickly found a way around him. So you're right about that; as it stands, the blacklist is useless. You can find your opponent's comments in the "recent comments" section, open all his posts and minus, minus .... In general, do your favorite thing. Even when I did not write anything, your friend turned to other members of the forum: "Throw an idea to Normal, otherwise he has a literary crisis" As soon as I wrote a few comments, they were immediately minus. So for those who want squabbles and quarrels, the black list is not a hindrance, unfortunately

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Normal

But even with the help of the black list it was impossible to get rid of your "group".

Well, I actually didn’t put any cons. And why do you think that all the cons from us? or do you have only like-minded people here? It doesn’t happen. I, too, for one of the posts have got rid of cons and maybe from some of my friends but I don’t make a tragedy out of it And by the way I don’t start the first one - there must be a push from outside Well, finally, you seem to be not a stupid person, so try to understand that what you call a flood sometimes helps to relieve stress and sometimes for now Who is what?

[Normal]

I will not argue with you. Just doing it like this; statement:

Quote: Ruslan67

Well, I didn’t put any cons

The answer is your quote:

Quote: Ruslan67

You raked off us cons

Question:

Quote: Ruslan67

And why do you think that all the cons from us?

Answer:

Quote: Ruslan67

Well, let's arrange a war for them ....... The first time or what?

Enough? I assure you that this is far from all, and for each of your statements that do not correspond to the truth, I will find the answer in your own posts. And I'll stick you there like a naughty cat. And you don't need to "bred" me:

Quote: Ruslan67

Are you only like-minded people here? It doesn’t happen

Quote: Ruslan67

try to understand that what you call a flood sometimes helps to relieve stress and sometimes while knowing who is worth what

I grew up in a criminal village and loved such divorces in childhood.
You and the accomplice minus me in that war, and maybe even Odessa, who is also not meeting her old acquaintances for the first time. The topic was old, and besides us, almost no one was there. By the way, you did not prove there that you were right or that I was wrong. Instead, they switched to personalities, insults, slander and when the posts accumulated enough amicably hit the minuses. Then he happily quipped:

Quote: Ruslan67

Well, I waited Father Fedor

Sorry, but I can't cite a flood video about a deer from your accomplice, since apparently he also "waited" and now "discharges" somewhere else, probably in the same "Country of the Deer" So I advise you too " relieve tension "in communicating with those who like it, and not with me. Moreover, who is what I am worth and without your flood, banter and rudeness, I will somehow figure it out

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Ruslan67

You raked off from us minuses for posts in our common swara and nothing more

Quote in full

Quote: Normal

Instead, they switched to personalities, insults, slander and when the posts accumulated enough amicably hit the minuses. Then he happily quipped:

Climb into the archive and see who started and when and why I joined

Quote: Normal

And I'll stick you there like a naughty cat. And you don't need to "bred" me:

You are not a rabbit to breed you. Follow your own words and understand why you are becoming personal. By the way, about a criminal village: if you talked there like that, it’s strange that you are still not in the deer’s country Well, the jargon type-surrendered rat rats and so on, it also says a lot

[Normal]

Quote: Ruslan67

Quote in full

The meaning is not changed. You shit, and when they poke you into yours, then you do not like it. List all posts completely? Do not consider me more stupid than yourself, I don’t react to such manipulations.

Quote: Ruslan67

Climb into the archive and see who started and when and why I joined

I remember very well how it all started. From my neutral question "How much? If not a secret?" In response, your accomplice was furious as if he had been insulted. You joined when I called your action by my name. My "jargon type-passed" just shows what you did then. It's not for nothing that Cavas got so mad.
In the "reindeer country" with such actions, you will find yourself faster than me with my vocabulary.

Quote: Ruslan67

rat rats, etc. it also says a lot

It only says that anyone who wants to call others hamsters and considers himself great for this will be called a rat. What is hello, so is the answer

[DeerIvanovich]

thanks for the innovation. sometimes ears already fade from stupidity and from a mat ...

[Spartakv]

I support! It is one thing to communicate, albeit not always agreeing, with a smart opponent, and it is quite another to waste time on a boor or a fool.

[gallville]

The innovation will not be superfluous.

[smile]

I believe there is no need to introduce an emergency.
If someone does not want to encounter someone else’s comments, he or she may simply not read the text following the corresponding nickname. Do not like Chingachgook - do not eat! :))))
All are adults and are able to control whose comments are worth paying attention to and whose are not.

Why create a situation on a public site - someone sees, someone - no? Why provide anyone with the possibility of immunity from opponents who are able to not leave stone to stone from their argument?
Also, as some colleagues rightly say, this creates the basis for various maneuvers ... why?
I think such an innovation will not benefit the site. The site should be extremely transparent.
Proponents of the emergency would like to say that a person who leaves his comments here should be ready to defend his point of view and argue for it. Otherwise, it may seem that he himself understands that the information contained in the commentary is unproven fabrications ..... In this case, perhaps you should not write low-value assumptions, but limit yourself to viewing articles.?

[SAVA555.IVANOV]

The "black list" is not general, it is personal for everyone. When you add a visitor to an emergency, he does not see your comments, you are his. Neither he nor you can send private messages to each other.
Perhaps this part requires adjustment, maybe even an extra one.
And then our people how to do it !!!)))))
"Cops" will start "not cops" in emergency situations, military civilians, Muslim Christians and vice versa. The meaning will be lost.

[Myth]

Thanks to the authors, options !!!

[Aventurinka]

Perhaps the function is good, but I do not think that I will use it. In my opinion, the rules of the site are enough.

[Waroc]

Let it be.
No one will run away from disputes and conflicts (not those gathered here!), It is a pleasure to argue with a decent person, regardless of who is right (the wrong person will just understand and agree with the opponent’s arguments), but sometimes completely inadequate characters come across, they they don’t recognize the justified arguments - arguing and proving something to such people is a waste of time and energy, they live in their own world - it’s easier to ignore such people so that they don’t flash before your eyes.

[zmey]

Good start.
Sometimes it is very unpleasant to read "srach" between opponents.

[sergo0000]

Maybe a good innovation, I don’t know! I haven’t appreciated it yet.
But if it works the same way as restricting voting for one and one users, then the price is worthless!
In order not to be unfounded, I suggest that moderators and administrators visit my profile and see how much my rating has fallen only during one night. Unless, of course, it is possible to see the profile history. In my opinion, on January 22-23, I don’t remember exactly. Yes, in general, I did not bother too. So, in one night the rating fell to 24 (!) And on the next day to 6000. Of course, there is no happiness in it, but if a newcomer is dropped immediately without explanation, you yourself understand that this is almost ban for him! days, I did not see anything suspicious, But the fact remains a fact!
I suspect that this happened after the article on Israeli cyber special forces was issued in Israel on a paid basis! Well, according to my comments on them! So the trolls are organized and the more dangerous they are, the higher their rating! Be careful about Israel and the Jews gu!

[irony]

Helpful. The main thing is that it is "useful" to be useful for normal people, but not for everyone.

[crambol]

The novelty is interesting, although not indisputable and not without its drawbacks (in my first impression). The near future should show pros and cons. So far, we can say that comments have become more accurate, although emotions caused by the "invisibility" of the commentator often pop up. It's a pity! I would introduce a rule - put your photo as an avatar.

[SAVA555.IVANOV]

Dear and why do you need a photo? Then find and wave "crusts" or fists? Are you not interested in opinions and thoughts? Meaning?

[nas leonid]

I do not like pederasts and boors, but let it be who is who, it is important to know, and let the bare truth rather than tolerance be better.

[SAVA555.IVANOV]

Well, of course, there are probably hidden buggers here, they cling to people, they want to look at a guy’s photo, they provoke them into a meeting)))), the only people who are rude here are the losers who are destroying their own people and the officers who ruined the Army and who received benefits and apartments for this, it’s just the truth in their eyes it stings)))))) the rest simply have no reason, there are only different opinions

[WADUHa]

The decision is correct... I support it.

[sdf23wesdgg]

Imagine, it turns out that our authorities have complete information about each of us. And now she has appeared on the Internet http://trunc.it/m8pnt Very surprised and scared,
my correspondence, addresses, phone numbers, even found my nude photo, I can’t even imagine from where. The good news is that the data can be deleted from the site, of course, I used it and I advise everyone not to hesitate

[dred]

An interesting idea. But I’m not trying to hide from anyone.

[Colonel]

I find it useful. Already used it!

[Forward]

Useful feature. I support!

[Lolitatic]

SocPlugin 3.07 is a unique and free application for licensed XRumer.
Sends messages/comments/invites on three social networks at once - Odnoklassniki, Mamba and VKontakte.

The unique feature of this software is a fully automatic bypass of captcha VKontakte, Odnoklassniki, and Mamba, without any third-party services and without the need for manual input.


In Yandex you can find more information.

[cap-blood]

Comrades! And what will be the point of our communication on the esteemed website “Military Review” if we, like squeaky girls, start hiding behind all sorts of “black”, “white”, “blue”, etc. lists?! In fact, the recipe is simple and ancient: do not do to others what you would not want them to do to you. Respect for others is the flip side of respect for yourself. From a person’s statements it is immediately clear who is who and what he is worth, so is it necessary to deprive our communication of such a bright human trait called speech?

[Ziksura]

Completely pointless feature. He never stooped to profanity. But he liked to argue. There is something about the excitement of battle in this. The site is still "MILITARY REVIEW". All my traditional opponents suddenly disappeared. I can’t call it anything other than cowardice. Oh, there is no satisfaction from such a victory. Just like in sports. You were preparing, getting ready, and they just raised your hand in view of your opponent’s refusal and that’s it... Boring. And this is on a military website. If you are not ready for a tough confrontation, you need to choose an appropriate site.

[old_belarus]

So far I have not used such a “function”, even if it is available on other sites... But if they did, so be it...

[taubyflut]

I haven’t visited this forum for a long time, but in vain, so many new things have appeared here... =)

[elenagromova]

A question arose: if I added a professor to the list, will he no longer be able to comment on my publications? Already got it.

[alone]

There will be comments, but you won’t be able to read it))

[elenagromova]

It's a pity... Is it possible to make it so that someone added to the blacklist cannot comment on the publications of the person who added him?

[chehywed]

elenagromova, the question arose - if I added a professor to the list, he will no longer be able to comment on my publications? Already got it

alone , there will be comments, but you won’t be able to read it

Dear administrators, something needs to be done about this. I just noticed a certain “New Rus'” that writes anti-Russian things in the comments, but it disappeared into the emergency situation. Can the emergency be limited to personal messages?

[VARCHUN]

I’ve seen more than once that sometimes the moderators themselves talk such nonsense, and that’s why I write to them who put you in this post.

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[fantast]

test test test test test test

[greenx]

asdfsf sfsd sfsdf sdfsdf

[fantast]

qwerqwerqwerqwer

[fantast]

qwerqwerqwerqwer

[greenx]

sfsdfsdf sdf sfsdf sdfsdf

[Anuta86hof]

hut she saw the town of Mafooti. On the plain to the west she saw a number
for it is larger now than when my mother was a child."
with her hand, the only handkerchief available, looked round to see her
they should strike straight across the desert--then, then they
would not give it up, as his servants demanded that I should do,


http://designstages.net/date/09-2013547.php
http://designstages.net/date/02-201365.php
http://designstages.net/date/12612.php
http://designstages.net/date/emulators-on-ps3.php
http://designstages.net/date/04-2013155.php

[Kennethjell]

everything has its time...

[kniskinyflife]

Hello. And Bye.a

[Akimichs]

office computer programs download http://www.nobninsk.ru/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=61359