The tragic death of Emperor Paul I

61
The tragic death of Emperor Paul I
S. Chudanov. Assassination of Paul I on the night of March 11-12, 1801

In this article we will continue the story of the conspiracy against Paul I and talk about the death of this emperor and the fate of his killers.

March of drunken guards


As we remember from previous article, on the eve of the assassination of Paul I, from 40 to 60 guards officers gathered in the house of the Governor-General of St. Petersburg P. A. Palen, all of them, except Bennigsen and Palen himself, were drunk. It was then that Palen said his famous phrase:

“I remind you, gentlemen, that in order to eat scrambled eggs, you must first break the eggs.”

Palen proposed to split into two groups: the “official” one, with him at the head, and the “shock”, which was to be led by Platon Zubov and Bennigsen. Since everyone was suddenly confused, he had to “place everyone, except the generals, indiscriminately, in turn: one to the right, one to the left.” The Zubov brothers split up: Nikolai went with Plato and Bennigsen, Valerian, who was one-legged (and had difficulty climbing stairs), went with Palen.



A. S. Pushkin described this “campaign” in his poem “Liberty”:

“He sees - in ribbons and stars,
Drunk with wine and anger,
Hidden killers are coming,
There is insolence on their faces, fear in their hearts.”

Palen positioned his detachment at the front entrance, declaring that anyone who tried to come to the aid of the emperor would be arrested. However, many believe that if the mission of the second group failed, he was going to arrest the unlucky conspirators.

Zubov and Bennigsen led their men to the Christmas gate of the castle. With them was Parade Major Argamakov, who betrayed the emperor, and had the right of access to the emperor. Let us turn again to the poems of A. S. Pushkin:

“The unfaithful sentry is silent,
The drawbridge is silently lowered,
The gates are open in the darkness of the night
By the hired hand of betrayal..."

Already in the castle, the conspirators began to gradually “weed out”, and with each step there were fewer and fewer of them. Even Platon Zubov tried to escape, but he was stopped by Bennigsen, who said:

"How? You yourself brought us here and now you want to retreat? This is impossible, we have gone too far... The die has been cast, we must act. Forward".

Murder


Either 10 or 12 people approached the door of Paul I’s bedroom. The sentry Agapeev and the room hussar Kirillov stood here. They were unarmed, and therefore the conspirators easily and quickly dealt with them: they were stunned with saber blows to the back of the head (some claim that one of them was stunned, and the other ran away).

After this, Argamakov entered into negotiations with the royal valet. Some recalled that he claimed that morning had come and it was time to wake up the emperor, others that he spoke about a fire.

The valet was very surprised, but still opened the door - this was enough: the conspirators burst into the imperial chambers. Paul heard the noise, and he could have been saved if, on the advice of Palen, he had not ordered the door to the empress’s bedroom to be boarded up.

But it remains a mystery why he didn’t use the secret passage leading to the room of his favorite, Anna Gagarina? Got confused and simply forgot about this opportunity? Or did he not have time to open the door and was forced to hide in his bedroom?

Some recalled that he stood behind the window curtain, others - behind the fireplace screen, others - that he was behind the bedside screen.

One way or another, having not found the emperor in the bedroom, the conspirators were close to panic, since it was clear to everyone that this night invasion into the emperor’s bedroom would be impossible to explain with any reasonable arguments, and the surviving Paul would not spare anyone.

Only Bennigsen maintained composure, who, feeling the bed, declared:

“The nest is warm, the bird is not far away.”

Very soon Pavel was discovered, and Bennigsen, who had drawn his sword, announced to him:

“Sire, you are my prisoner, and your reign has come to an end. Abdicate the throne and immediately sign an act of abdication in favor of Grand Duke Alexander.”

And added:

“Do not resist, sir! This is about your life!

Pavel, who mistook one of the conspirators for his son Konstantin, tried to escape from the bedroom.

At that moment, some noise was heard in the castle, and Platon Zubov, completely chickened out, was the first to run out of the bedroom, followed by many other conspirators. Only a few people, led by Bennigsen (and some believe only Bennigsen), were left alone with the emperor.

However, it turned out that it was not soldiers loyal to him who were heading to the emperor’s chambers, but other conspirators—those who had fallen behind earlier.

Bennigsen later recalled:

“Meanwhile, my fugitives met with their accomplices and returned to Pavel’s room... a terrible crush occurred, the screen fell on the lamp, and it went out. I went out to get some fire from the next room. In this short period of time, Pavel passed away.”

However, other conspirators said that at the time of the murder, Bennigsen was standing nearby with a candle in his hand and looking at the paintings hanging in the hallway.

Now Platon Zubov read the act of abdication to the emperor, but Pavel firmly answered: “No, I will not sign,” and then the cry of Colonel V. Yashvil, the head of the Horse Guards artillery, was heard:

“Prince! Stop talking! Now he will sign everything you want, and tomorrow our heads will fly on the scaffold.”

That is, not only Palen, but also many other conspirators understood perfectly well that the emperor should be killed even if he signed the required document.

Pavel began to call for help, and Nikolai Zubov, “a man of enormous stature and extraordinary strength,” whom his acquaintances called a “bull” (and some “behind his back” - a “stupid bull”) stepped in. With the words “why are you shouting like that,” he hit the emperor on the hand. The indignant Pavel, in turn, hit and pushed him away. The Tsar now behaved so confidently and boldly that the conspirators were again at a loss, but Bennigsen and Platon Zubov were already openly calling for reprisals against him.

Bennigsen is said to have said:

“This is about us. If he escapes, we are lost."

He was supported by Platon Zubov, who stated:

"What do you want? Civil war? The Gatchinaskys are committed to him! Everything must end here!”

After this, Nikolai Zubov hit Pavel in the temple with a golden snuffbox.


Portrait of Count N. A. Zubov by an unknown artist


Nikolai Zubov's snuff box, given to him by Catherine II

The emperor fell and other conspirators attacked him. Someone tore off the scarf hanging over Paul's bed and began to strangle the emperor with it.

Many believe that the role of executioner was performed by an officer of the Izmailovsky regiment named Skaryatin. Platon Zubov stood nearby, turning to the window, and kept repeating:

“My God, how this man screams!”


Death of Paul I in an engraving by Utwait from a drawing by Filippoto

Soon it was all over.

In the notes of one of the life physicians you can read:

“Paul I’s body was covered in bruises. A serious wound in the temple area, a large red spot on the side, abrasions on the knees, indicating that they had tried to strangle the victim who was standing in this position. Multiple abrasions and bruises left by blows that were probably inflicted after the death of the emperor.”

"Alexander the Blessed" begins to reign


Then there was a series of fainting spells (feigned and real), acting, undisguised cynicism and rivalry between the son and his mother.

Having received the news of his father’s death, Alexander I tried to cry, but changed his mind after Palen told him:

“Too childish. Go and reign."

Realizing that power was not on his side now, and someone else might be called “to reign,” Alexander decided to start reigning - but that was not the case. His mother, Empress Maria Feodorovna, announced her claims to the crown.


Maria Feodorovna in a portrait by an unknown artist, late XNUMXth century

Hearing the noise, she decided that a fire had started and, having dressed, tried to leave the bedroom - but was stopped by the conspirators standing at the door, who literally pushed her back. Being a smart woman, she, of course, realized that another palace coup was taking place. And therefore, the news of the death of her husband, with whom Countess Charlotte von Lieven (governess to the younger children of Paul I) came to her on Palen’s orders, should not have taken her by surprise.

Langeron recalled:

“Madame Lieven... told her (Maria Feodorovna) that the emperor had an apoplexy and that he was very ill.
“No,” she exclaimed, “he died, they killed him!”
Madame Lieven could no longer hide the truth; then the empress rushed to her husband’s bedroom.”

And here’s how Lieven herself recalled it:

“She (the empress) screamed and demanded to be allowed to see the deceased. They convinced her that this was impossible. She exclaimed to this:
“So even if they kill me, I want to see him!”

And then the empress decided that she could well replace her murdered husband on the throne - in fact, why is she worse than Anna Ioannovna, Elizaveta Petrovna and the two Catherines?

For four hours she insisted that she “wants to rule” (ich will regieren) and refused to recognize her son as emperor. The naive woman did not understand that the guards in Russia do not engage in charity, and in order to become an empress, you need to have at least “a certain number of grenadiers, a cellar with vodka and several bags of gold” (the words of the Saxon envoy Petzold, said to him after the seizure of power Catherine II).

Nevertheless, Maria Fedorovna acts. She tries to break into the room where the doctors are at this time trying to hide the traces of an “apoplectic blow to the temple with a snuff box.” Velyaminov-Zernov recalled it this way:

“Suddenly the empress breaks in on the door and shouts: “Let me in, let me in!”
One of the Zubovs said: “Get that woman out there.” Evsei Gordanov, a strong man, grabbed her in his arms and brought her back to her bedroom like a burden.”

Maria Fedorovna managed to get out of the bedroom and tried from the balcony
turn to the troops - she was “removed” from there by order of Palen.

Maria Feodorovna, in a roundabout way, through other rooms, again went to her husband’s bedroom, here her path was blocked by 40 Semyonovites, led by K. Poltoratsky, who recalled:

“The Empress... came in and said in broken Russian: “Let me through to him.” Obeying mechanical instinct, I answered her: “It’s impossible, Your Majesty.”
- “How can you not? I’m still an empress, please let me in.”
- “The Emperor did not order.”
- “Who-who?”
- “Sovereign Alexander Pavlovich.”
She flared up, furiously pushing me away, grabbed me by the collar, threw me against the wall and rushed towards the soldiers. I gave them the signal to cross their bayonets, repeating: “Not ordered, Your Majesty.”
She wept bitterly."

Bennigsen appeared and suggested that she stop “playing a comedy”:

“She shook her finger at me with the following words, spoken quite quietly: “Oh, I will make you repent.”

Then Bennigsen, on behalf of the new emperor, demanded that she follow him to the Winter Palace to swear allegiance to the emperor. Prince Eugene of Württemberg recalled:

“Maria Fedorovna exclaimed: “Who is the emperor? Who calls Alexander emperor?” To which Bennigsen replied: “The voice of the nation.” She replied: “I do not recognize him,” and since the general remained silent, she quietly added: “Until he reports to me for his behavior.” Bennigsen again invited her to go to Winter, and the young empress supported his proposal. However, the Empress Mother accepted this with great displeasure and attacked her with the words: “What are you telling me? I'm not the one who has to obey! Obey if you wish!"

Elizaveta Alekseevna replied:

“This country is tired of the power of a fat old German woman (Catherine II). Leave her the opportunity to enjoy the young Russian Tsar!”

Maria Fedorovna still wandered around the palace, and, as they say, either fought with the soldiers or fell on her knees in front of them. Finally, having accepted defeat, she went to the Winter Palace. Then she came to her husband’s body - together with Alexander. Here Maria Fedorovna “with a look full of dignity” said to her son:

“Now I congratulate you - you are the emperor.”

Not knowing what to answer, Alexander chose to faint. Having come to his senses, he obediently promised that with him everything would be “like with grandma.”

After the assassination of the emperor


We often read that at the news of the death of Paul I, Petersburg was filled with rejoicing. It remains only to clarify that only the nobles rejoiced at his death, while the people mourned the death of this emperor; there is numerous evidence that for a long time ordinary people lit candles in memory of Paul, and even asked him for “heavenly intercession.”

The cause of death of Paul I was declared to be apoplexy, but the true cause was, as they say, an open secret, and therefore the court wits immediately “clarified the diagnosis”: “apoplexy blow to the temple with a snuff box.” Nevertheless, until 1905, the official cause of death of this emperor was called a stroke.

Neither the doctors nor the court painter were able to hide the traces of this blow on the emperor’s face, and therefore, during the official farewell of the deceased, a triangular hat was pulled over his forehead, hiding his left eye and temple.

The manifesto on Alexander’s accession to the throne was written by Senator Troshchinsky - by the way, the brother-in-law of Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol’s father, he was also part of the conspirators.

None of the emperor’s murderers suffered serious punishment, and Napoleon had every right to sneer at Alexander:

“If at the time when England was plotting the assassination of Paul I, they knew that the instigators of the conspiracy were at a distance of one league from the border, would they really not have tried to capture them?”

Palen, at the insistence of the Dowager Empress Maria Feodorovna, was sent into retirement “due to illness from all his affairs” and until February 1826 lived quietly on his Courland estate, not repenting at all and declaring to everyone that he had accomplished “the greatest feat.”

Nikita Petrovich Panin was returned to St. Petersburg and actually headed the Collegium of Foreign Affairs. Then he went on a trip to Europe. Upon his return, Alexander I, who had lost interest in him, sent Panin to the Dugino estate that belonged to him - and this disgrace was in no way connected with the murder of Paul I.


Duginsky Palace in a photograph from the beginning of the XNUMXth century.

Here he lived in full prosperity for more than 30 years, mainly studying the occult sciences and magic. At the same time, he complained that he was “subjected to civil execution.”

Bennigsen, whom, as we remember, the wife of the murdered emperor promised to “make repent,” was already appointed Lithuanian governor in March 1801, and in June of the following year became a cavalry general. He fought a lot against Napoleon and his marshals (the battles of Pultusk, Preussisch-Eylau, Guttstadt, Heilsberg, Friedland, Bergfried, the battles of Borodino and Tarutino, the battle of Leipzig, the siege of Hamburg). In 1818 he retired and went to Hanover, dying in October 1826.

Platon Zubov went abroad at the end of 1801, where, as we remember from the article Platon Zubov. The last favorite of Catherine II, participated in an anecdotal duel with the Chevalier Joseph de Saxe, who once almost took his place in Catherine’s bed.

A year later he returned to Russia. In 1814 he settled on his Lithuanian estate Janishki. Neighbors remembered him as an incredibly stingy and sloppy person who quickly became decrepit. A year before his death, 54-year-old Platon unexpectedly fell in love with the 19-year-old poor noblewoman Tekla (Fekla) Ignatievna Valentinovich (this family owned only 30 “souls” of peasants) and actually “bought” her from her parents - for a million rubles.


Tekla Valentinović in a portrait of Izabe, 1820

They settled in the Ruenthal estate, here three weeks after the death of Zubov (the former temporary worker of Catherine II died in April 1822), Tekla gave birth to a daughter who died in infancy. K. Walishevsky reports that as an inheritance she received “twenty million, which had long been uselessly lying in the storerooms of the house” and many diamonds. Plato's relatives tried to sue her, but were unsuccessful. Later, this woman married Count Andrei Shuvalov, with whom she gave birth to three children.

Nikolai Zubov, who inflicted an “apoplectic blow to the temple with a snuff box” on the father of Alexander I, remained in the service and at his posts – chief horseman and president of the Court stable office. He retired in 1803 and died on his Moscow estate in August 1805, at the age of 42.

Valerian Zubov, who was often ill, settled on a Courland estate, where he led a quiet, inconspicuous life and died in the summer of 1804.

But the life of Olga Zherebtsova-Zubova turned out to be very eventful and very scandalous. As we remember, shortly before the assassination of Paul I, she left Russia and learned about his death at a ball given by the Prussian king. After this, Olga went to London, where, as some contemporaries claimed, she received 2 million rubles to transfer to the participants in the conspiracy.

Her protégé A. Herzen, for example, wrote about this, who himself never refused foreign money, had close ties with the Rothschild clan and, to call a spade a spade, was also that “foreign agent”. By the way, Zherebtsova never shared this money with anyone. However, historians do not yet have a receipt for Zherebtsova receiving this amount.

In London, Olga learned that her lover Charles Whitworth had married the Duchess of Dorset, and caused a terrible scandal. She calmed down only after receiving compensation in the amount of £10 from her rival. After this, she entered into a relationship with the Prince Regent - the future George IV, and even hinted that she had secretly married him.


George, Prince of Wales, 1798

In 1806, she gave birth to a son from the prince, who received the name George (Egor Avgustovich) Nord. He rose to the rank of colonel, and one of his sons, Yegor Yegorovich Nord (Olga’s grandson), was the Russian consul in Persia, where he died of smallpox.

Olga’s legitimate daughter (from Chamberlain Zherebtsov), Elizaveta Alexandrovna, took after her mother and “became famous” by having a relationship with a French prisoner of war, Count Piret, and became pregnant by him.

But let's return to the sister of the Zubov brothers. Olga Zherebtsova returned to St. Petersburg in 1810, here she helped Herzen obtain a passport to leave Russia.

By the way, they say that during her stay abroad, Olga “closely” met the father of this oppositionist - this is how some explain her participation in his fate.

And Olga Zherebtsova herself in St. Petersburg was known for her opposition to Nicholas I, allowing herself unflattering remarks about the emperor and his entourage. With age, her character completely deteriorated; in society she was known as a grumpy old woman who was always dissatisfied with everything.

In conclusion of the article, we will say that one of the representatives of the Zubov family became famous for his duel with A.S. Pushkin, which is believed to have been described in the story “The Shot”. Having lost at cards, Pushkin hinted at his opponent’s “unclean” game and was challenged by him to a duel, which took place in the vicinity of Chisinau. Standing at the barrier, the poet ate cherries that were poured into his cap. Here is a quote from the story “The Shot”:

“He approached holding a cap filled with cherries. The seconds measured out twelve steps for us. I was supposed to shoot first: but the excitement of anger in me was so strong that I did not rely on the fidelity of my hand and, in order to give myself time to cool down, I conceded the first shot to him; my opponent did not agree. They decided to cast lots: the first number went to him, the eternal favorite of happiness. He took aim and shot through my cap. The line was behind me. His life was finally in my hands; I looked at him greedily, trying to catch at least one shadow of concern... He stood under the gun, choosing ripe cherries from his cap and spitting out the seeds, which flew to me.”

Zubov missed, Pushkin refused his shot.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    30 November 2023 05: 00
    A. Herzen, who himself never refused foreign money, had close ties with the Rothschild clan and, to call a spade a spade, was also that “foreign agent” ..

    How this all reminds us of today...
    1. +1
      30 November 2023 09: 08
      Navalny probably considered himself the second Herzen. But Herzen was smarter - he sat in London and “watered down the regime” from there. And this one, after pancreatic necrosis due to “abuse,” for some reason returned from Germany. However, it is possible that they kicked him onto the plane - in those days there was no such thing, but a reason was required and a “sacred sacrifice of the regime” was needed.
      1. +6
        30 November 2023 09: 44
        By the way, about Herzen. He was a bastard (at the time of his birth his parents were not married), and in connection with this his father came up with the surname Herzen (from German Herz - heart) for his son.
        And if his parents were married, his last name would be Yakovlev. And our university, in St. Petersburg, was named not after Herzen, but after Yakovlev. That's it, sir. wink
        1. +15
          30 November 2023 10: 48
          1. How powerfully the gentlemen’s bun crunched.
          2. Naturally, these Russian nobles did not know the Russian language. And the phrase about scrambled eggs is a famous French proverb:
          "On ne fait pas d'omelette sans casser des œufs"
          A Russian person would say: "They cut down the forest - the caps fly"
          3. Well, the most important thing that brings the feudal aristocracy together now and then is - “slaves do not have a nationality.”
          The nobles believed, not without reason, that Russia was their state, occupying all government posts.
  2. +9
    30 November 2023 05: 01
    The famous snuff-box, the cause of apoplexy, is in the Hermitage. Rarity!
    1. +3
      30 November 2023 05: 18
      Quote: ee2100
      .. Rarity!

      This is just the technical side of the issue...
    2. +5
      30 November 2023 12: 26
      There are big questions with this snuff box. It surfaced only at the very end of the 19th century, in 1897, before which its history cannot be traced.

      In the Hermitage snuffbox there is a red morocco insert with a gold-embossed inscription: “belonged to the Ober-Stalmeister Count Nikolai Alexandrovich ZUBOV.” A note in German that came with the snuff box has also reached us: “Getragen von Frsten Platon Alexandrwitch Subow am 11 Marz 1801” - “Was with Prince Platon Alexandrovich Zubov on March 11, 1801.”

      The discrepancy with the known information and the type of snuffbox immediately catches the eye.
      ...the version according to which the emperor was knocked down by a blow from Nikolai Zubov, who was clutching a “massive golden snuffbox” in his fist, causes bewilderment when trying to connect it with a monument from the Hermitage collection. Our snuff box is made of a thin sheet of 500-carat gold and is very light: as O.G. reported. Kostyuk, its keeper and its first researcher, the snuff box weighs 84,74 g. With a knockout blow dealt to Pavel Petrovich, it would inevitably have crumpled - but there are no signs of deformation on it. And the note in German mentioned above indicates that on the day of the regicide it was not Count Nikolai who carried it with him, but Prince Platon Zubov...
      1. VLR
        +2
        30 November 2023 12: 34
        Yes, this snuff box was probably in the possession of one of the Zubov brothers on the night of the emperor’s assassination, but it could have belonged to Plato. And then someone either confused him with Nikolai, or for “greater effect” deliberately attributed it to Nikolai Zubov - and thereby sharply increased the historical significance of this exhibit. The snuff box really doesn't look very heavy.
        1. 0
          30 November 2023 17: 31
          In those days, a snuff box was not just a box for storing tobacco. The snuff box was a status item; it was decorated with monograms, portraits, and could serve as a reward from kings along with orders. It’s hard to believe that Nikolai Zubov, the horseman of the court, lieutenant general, court and military official of the high 3rd class, had such a simple and utilitarian, albeit golden, snuff box; he would have been laughed at. Such a box was even less suitable for Platon Zubov, the last favorite of Catherine 2, known for his passion for snuff, the Most Serene Prince (the sixth in the history of Russia, the first was Menshikov), General-Fieldmaster.
  3. +10
    30 November 2023 05: 16
    There is no sadder story in the world than the story of the murder of a “good king” by “bad boyars”.
  4. 0
    30 November 2023 05: 59
    The tragic death of Emperor Paul I

    All this is curious, nothing more and confirms only one truth:
    You shouldn't live among people, imagining yourself to be God.
    The tragedy is that some rulers carry out their affairs without thinking about the consequences.
  5. +17
    30 November 2023 06: 54
    Who cares, but I like Emperor Paul I... after all, he was the first monarch who made life easier for serfs by signing the “Decree on the Three-Day Corvee.”
    And at the beginning of his reign, he installed a complaint box (although it later had to be removed).
    And Paul I also got up early and went to bed early (he got up at 5 o’clock, everyone was asleep at 22:00).

    In general, despite a number of failures of Paul I, I repeat, I like him.

    Thank you very much for the article, Valery!
    1. VLR
      +19
      30 November 2023 07: 11
      first monarch who
      made life easier for serfs by signing the “Decree on three-day corvée”

      This alone is enough for us, descendants of not nobles and, of course, not aristocrats, to remember Paul I with gratitude. And the descendants of the “lieutenants Golitsyns and cornets Obolenskys” who fled Russia after the revolution, sitting in their Londons and Parises, let them continue to talk about him as a “crazy tyrant.”
      1. +9
        30 November 2023 10: 52
        Quote: VlR
        as a "crazy tyrant"

        he is an extremely contradictory figure, on the one hand, a progressor on the other, he absolutely did not know how to negotiate and went straight ahead
        although it’s a pity that he would have been killed, but there was a chance to crush the English hydra and he was killed precisely for this reason
      2. +1
        30 November 2023 15: 53
        [quote=VlR] monarch who [quote]made life easier for the serfs [guote] .... enough for us .... to remember Paul I with gratitude. And the descendants of the “lieutenants Golitsyns and cornets Obolenskys,” who fled Russia after the revolution, ..... speak of him as a “crazy tyrant.”[/quote]
        hi And today no one publicly mourns Paul I, does not curse his murderers, does not wish them punishment and punishment, does not go in religious processions around the Mikhailovsky Castle, and there are no special memorial plaques praising his deeds and plans, which were not allowed to come true by a bunch of criminals, whose names are known!
    2. +4
      30 November 2023 07: 14
      Quote from Kojote21
      .. I like Emperor Paul I... after all, he was the first monarch who made life easier for serfs by signing the “Decree on the Three-Day Corvee.”
      And at the beginning of his reign, he installed a complaint box (although it later had to be removed).
      [
      All this taken together contributed to the further “displacement” of this emperor from his position in the traditional way for those times. Just like the saying goes: “No good deed goes unpunished in the future!”
      1. +4
        30 November 2023 07: 59
        Quote: venaya
        Quote from Kojote21
        .. I like Emperor Paul I... after all, he was the first monarch who made life easier for serfs by signing the “Decree on the Three-Day Corvee.”
        And at the beginning of his reign, he installed a complaint box (although it later had to be removed).
        [
        All this taken together contributed to the further “displacement” of this emperor from his position in the traditional way for those times. Just like the saying goes: “No good deed goes unpunished in the future!”

        Unfortunately ... recourse
      2. +3
        30 November 2023 10: 54
        Quote: venaya
        All this taken together contributed to the further “displacement” of this emperor from his position in the traditional way for those times.

        the main reason is the Indian trek
        1. 0
          30 November 2023 12: 58
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          the main reason is the Indian trek

          This is exactly what I wrote about in the very first comment of the first part of the article in this author’s series, on 24.11/05 at 32:XNUMX:
          Quote: venaya
          the main reason for the murder of Emperor Pav I was that he, too, in French interests, organized the infringement of British interests by the Cossacks’ campaign against India ..
          And this part of the article is more devoted to the very technique of implementing this vile event.
    3. -1
      30 November 2023 10: 43
      Quote from Kojote21
      the first monarch who made life easier for serfs by signing the “Decree on Three-Day Corvee.”

      He didn't make it any easier. This was a legislative consolidation of a long-standing norm.
      It must be understood that the landowners, for all their quirks, for the most part understood perfectly well that their well-being depended on the peasants. Therefore, they tried to take care of the “souls” that belonged to them.
      Yes. There were also moral ones among them. So they didn’t go away even under Paul! And after him.
      And if some landowner decided to increase the corvee to exorbitant levels, no official could stop him. Only God, who took away his peasants and left the landowner with his bare, pardon my French, ass on the bare ground, but with the requirement to pay a poll tax for those who died of hunger.
      1. +4
        30 November 2023 11: 19
        Quote: Senior Sailor
        There were also moral ones among them.

        The sanctimonious engine removed the word - u r o d y, which is why the meaning almost changed)
        1. +4
          30 November 2023 12: 54
          I usually change one letter to a Latin one.
          My respect, Ivan!
          1. +1
            30 November 2023 15: 20
            My respect, Anton! hi
            Quote: 3x3zsave
            I usually change one letter to a Latin one.
            My respect, Ivan!

            On r, b, p or q?
            1. +1
              1 December 2023 19: 05
              Quote from Kojote21
              On r, b, p or q?

              Artyom! Tseskovsky greetings from the golden-domed one! Best of all: dots. That’s the right word. By God! Honestly! laughing
          2. +4
            30 November 2023 15: 41
            Quote: 3x3zsave
            My respect, Ivan!

            Mutually hi
            Quote: 3x3zsave
            I usually change one letter to a Latin one

            Interesting idea, but late)
            Plus, I don't know all the safe words.
            1. +1
              1 December 2023 18: 58
              Quote: Senior Sailor
              Plus, I don't know all the safe words.

              Ivan! Good evening! The best thing is punctuation marks. Reliable and high quality. For example.
              Fool.
              You understand, this is just an example of how to circumvent the law. If necessary. laughing hi
              With the greatest respect. hi
            2. +1
              1 December 2023 19: 14
              Quote: Senior Sailor
              Mutually

              Meeting of friends at *history*. Damn, old romantic. But? Damn it, how wonderful it is! hi
          3. +1
            1 December 2023 18: 52
            There is another option. Put a dot after each letter. An alternative? Yes. And about the fact that the site is not the same. Well, what can I say? There is no better answer than the phrase from *Pokrovsky Gate*. I mean: *I used to go to Mosestrada ....*
      2. +5
        30 November 2023 11: 40
        Quote: Senior Sailor
        He didn't make it any easier.

        Have you read the text of the “Decree on Three-Day Corvee”?

        This, if anything, is a translation of the “Decree ...” from Old Russian into modern Russian. And, in fact, this is a very successful decree. Another thing is that this decree was not observed everywhere.
        1. +4
          30 November 2023 12: 14
          Quote from Kojote21
          Have you read the text of the “Decree on Three-Day Corvee”?

          Yes. Just not a decree, but a manifesto.
          Quote from Kojote21
          This, if anything, is a translation of the “Decree ...” from Old Russian into modern Russian.

          Where? belay
          Here is the text
          We announce to all OUR loyal subjects.

          The Law of God taught to US in the Decalogue teaches US to devote the seventh day to it; why on this day, glorified by the triumph of the Christian faith, and on which WE were honored to receive the sacred anointing of the world and the Royal wedding on OUR Ancestor Throne, we consider it our duty to the Creator and the giver of all good things to confirm throughout OUR Empire about the exact and indispensable fulfillment of this law, commanding everyone and everyone should observe that no one under any circumstances dares to force the peasants to work on Sundays, especially since for rural products the six days remaining in the week, an equal number of them, are generally shared, both for the peasants themselves and for their work for the benefit of the following landowners, with good management they will be sufficient to satisfy all economic needs. Given in Moscow on the day of Holy Easter, April 5, 1797.

          Two points.
          It is forbidden to force people to work on Sunday, but this is the norm from the Council Code of Alexei Mikhailovich.
          the second - three days for the master, three for yourself. As was customary in the Great Russian provinces.
          Quote from Kojote21
          Another thing is that this decree was not observed everywhere.

          Historians are still arguing whether to consider this manifesto as a law or a recommendation...
          1. +1
            30 November 2023 12: 59
            Quote: Senior Sailor
            Quote from Kojote21
            Have you read the text of the “Decree on Three-Day Corvee”?

            Yes. Just not a decree, but a manifesto.
            Quote from Kojote21
            This, if anything, is a translation of the “Decree ...” from Old Russian into modern Russian.

            Where? belay
            Here is the text
            We announce to all OUR loyal subjects.

            The Law of God taught to US in the Decalogue teaches US to devote the seventh day to it; why on this day, glorified by the triumph of the Christian faith, and on which WE were honored to receive the sacred anointing of the world and the Royal wedding on OUR Ancestor Throne, we consider it our duty to the Creator and the giver of all good things to confirm throughout OUR Empire about the exact and indispensable fulfillment of this law, commanding everyone and everyone should observe that no one under any circumstances dares to force the peasants to work on Sundays, especially since for rural products the six days remaining in the week, an equal number of them, are generally shared, both for the peasants themselves and for their work for the benefit of the following landowners, with good management they will be sufficient to satisfy all economic needs. Given in Moscow on the day of Holy Easter, April 5, 1797.

            Two points.
            It is forbidden to force people to work on Sunday, but this is the norm from the Council Code of Alexei Mikhailovich.
            the second - three days for the master, three for yourself. As was customary in the Great Russian provinces.
            Quote from Kojote21
            Another thing is that this decree was not observed everywhere.

            Historians are still arguing whether to consider this manifesto as a law or a recommendation...

            Oh yes, the manifesto. I meant that the manifesto was written on the image not in Old Russian, but in modern writing.
            Law (de jure);
            Law (de facto).
            1. -1
              1 December 2023 19: 17
              Quote from Kojote21
              Law (de jure);
              Law (de facto).

              Karamba! But your test discus with Ivan makes this site the same! Bravo, hidalgos! hi
              1. 0
                1 December 2023 20: 42
                Quote: ArchiPhil
                Quote from Kojote21
                Law (de jure);
                Law (de facto).

                Karamba! But your test discus with Ivan makes this site the same! Bravo, hidalgos! hi

                Thank you! hi
    4. +10
      30 November 2023 11: 51
      I like Emperor Paul I

      He was very kind, liberal... But if he had impaled the boyars like Grozny, chopped off their heads like Pyotr Alekseevich, shot like Comrade Stalin - you see, he would have lived much longer and would have been able to do a lot of useful things for Russia and the people ..

      His fate is just another example of an obvious truth. If you want to change the course of the country, start with cleaning up the type of elite. Otherwise, you won’t end up doing well, and you won’t have time to accomplish a damn thing...
      1. +4
        30 November 2023 14: 04
        Quote: paul3390
        He was very kind

        They were not afraid of Pavel Petrovich, hence such blatant licentiousness among his courtiers.
        Emperor Caligula, of course, cannot be held up as an example as a pious ruler, but he loved to repeat......... Let them hate, as long as they are afraid.
        1. -2
          1 December 2023 19: 34
          Quote: bober1982
          They were not afraid of Pavel Petrovich, hence such blatant licentiousness among his courtiers.

          Damn it, but how does this relate to the current times, huh! They, the current rulers, are not afraid of anyone, neither the devil nor God. Because? Behind them is that system. Yes, yes, laugh at me, but the created system of world domination. SVO ?Yes, from the same *opera* dear comrades. Putin was inflamed with love for the Donetsk people? After eight years of bombing? Agreement. For? There were a lot of Slavs. Then. Now? A little less. On both sides. There will be even fewer. The main thing! Putin, who unleashed this massacre, is just a puppet. Let's remember the old * Time Machine *. What will happen? They? Will agree. Who will be to pay for this banquet? We. Because we are Russians and we pay for everything. And for some? Golden pistol, the name of *Putin’s infantryman*, fearlessly beating a Russian and all that kind of *nice stuff*. So think about it, who cares for a mother?
          Yes! Millions of Asians on Russian soil. It’s not annoying, isn’t it? This is Putin.
    5. 0
      2 December 2023 02: 01
      made life easier for serfs by signing the “Decree on Three-Day Corvee.”

      Do you believe this? How can signing a Decree make someone’s life easier if all the good intentions of the decree remain only on paper? This decree was never carried out by the landowners. And in Little Russia and Novorossiya it also caused indignation among the peasants, because there the corvée labor did not exceed 2 days.
      One can admire Paul's attempts to rule fairly, but his reforms were carried out not even in the spirit of an "enlightened monarchy", but in the spirit of "unlimited absolutism" and for the most part remained unrealized. Moreover, they were unrealized not because of his short reign. Pavel often, under the influence of a momentary impulse, made seemingly correct decisions, which he himself canceled due to the impossibility of their implementation.
      How did he adopt the budget for the first year of his reign? He wrote it on his own, without delving into the essence of the problem in the finances of the empire. Hurray, on paper the costs have been reduced by almost half! The result was that bills had to be printed again in the millions to plug holes in the budget.
      Yes. And how does “relief” for the people relate to the fact that Paul distributed 4 thousand peasants to the nobles in just over 600 years? His mother gave away only 200 thousand more, but she ruled 30 more.
      Pavel is a child of his time in terms of methods of government, but at the same time a romantic and idealist. No wonder they called him Don Quixote on the throne. Absolute power without sober thinking is a threat to the state. The nobility as the ruling stratum realized this. Paul's removal was a matter of time.
  6. +10
    30 November 2023 08: 14
    An interesting fact, I can’t say how reliable it is. At the end of the 12th century, the priests of the Peter and Paul Cathedral noticed that the grave of Pavel Petrovich was especially worshiped. Orthodox Christians, Catholics, Protestants, and even Turkestanians came. They began to find out why. It turned out that Pavel Petrovich performs miracles after death. He helped with childhood illnesses; the emperor, as you all remember, had 1917 children, as well as in unjust courts - after all, Paul I wanted everything to be true. The priests began to keep records of miracles: they recorded them in a special notebook. (The notebook with the records of miracles was lost in the State Historical Archive. There is a fund, an inventory, the name of the notebook, but they still cannot find it.) They began to prepare for canonization. She was appointed to February XNUMX. But this year the February Revolution broke out, the priests had no time for canonization, and Paul I was unlucky again... It seems that as soon as the notebook is found, they will definitely be canonized.
  7. +8
    30 November 2023 08: 18
    The canonization of Paul I was scheduled for March 1917; the February Revolution interrupted preparations for the glorification of the Russian Tsar.
    1. +1
      30 November 2023 09: 15
      But, interestingly, Nicholas the Bloody was canonized. Indeed, as has already been written, apparently because he was killed by those whose status allowed them to kill kings. But all the Yurovsky Jews are not allowed!
  8. +5
    30 November 2023 08: 51
    Greetings to all honest company from Konstantin (Sea Cat).
    1. +3
      30 November 2023 08: 56
      Good day, Sergey! hi
      Thank you very much! Mutually! hi
      1. 0
        2 December 2023 09: 21
        Quote from Korsar4
        Hello to all honest company from Konstantin

        There are fewer and fewer of us. Hello and good morning Sergey!!!
  9. +3
    30 November 2023 10: 58
    Quote: vet
    But, interestingly, Nicholas the Bloody was canonized. Indeed, as has already been written, apparently because he was killed by those whose status allowed them to kill kings. But all the Yurovsky Jews are not allowed!

    You like to carry... and not at all the light of knowledge)))
    Andrei Bogolyubsky was also killed by his boyars (those who, according to your logic, can), but this did not at all prevent him from being canonized.
    In general, there are different types of canonization. I already wrote to you about Nikolai. He was declared a passion-bearer. By the way, one can argue with this.
    With the “saints” it’s a different story. Roughly speaking, there are three criteria.
    1) Sinless life.
    2) Incorruption of remains after death
    3) And, perhaps, the most important thing - miracles during life or after death.
    In this case, this is precisely the third criterion. Miracles. But the trick is that they require “documentary confirmation”, and therefore a long collection of statistics.
  10. +3
    30 November 2023 11: 27
    However, historians do not yet have a receipt for Zherebtsova receiving this amount.

    In other words, this story is most likely a fiction. request
    1. +3
      30 November 2023 11: 47
      The big question is, was such a receipt possible? In which some high-ranking British official admits that a payment was made for the murder of the Russian emperor. But someone also received money for the Nord Stream explosion, but I think that in this case neither we nor our grandchildren will see the receipt.
      1. +3
        30 November 2023 12: 19
        Quote: vet
        The big question is, was such a receipt possible?

        A much more logical question is, is it even possible for payment for the murder of the emperor to be transferred through a lascivious wench?)))
        Quote: vet
        In which some high-ranking British official admits that a payment was made for the murder of the Russian emperor.

        This is completely optional. Just a receipt that such and such a person received money for services known to his royal majesty (or their lordships, that’s not the point).
        Remember the cardinal's famous receipt?
        No specifics - on my orders and for the benefit of the state. Yes
        1. +2
          30 November 2023 12: 28
          Is it even possible that payment for the murder of the emperor was transferred through a whorish wench?

          So Whitworth could vouch for her - so that she would leave him and his young wife behind. Like, an honest woman, I bet she won’t even take a penny for herself laughing
          1. +2
            30 November 2023 12: 47
            Quote: vet
            So Whitworth could vouch for her - so that she would leave him and his young wife behind.

            To get behind, Whitworth and his young wife paid a much smaller amount. And this amount, unlike the mythical millions, is documented.
            1. +2
              30 November 2023 14: 45
              You forget that Zherebtsova is not just a lascivious woman, but the secret wife of the future king of England and the mother of his child. This is a fundamentally different level of fornication, bringing it to a prominent place in the political arena. Like her brother Plato, or Madame Pompadour. This kind of money can be entrusted to pay the fees to the conspirators.
              1. +1
                30 November 2023 15: 38
                Quote: vet
                You forget

                I won't forget! tongue
                Quote: vet
                Zherebtsova is not just a lascivious woman, but the secret wife of the future king of England and the mother of his child.

                Do you mean to say that two lemmas were spent to pay off the debts of the Prince of Wales? laughing
                And I see that it doesn’t bother you at all that the story of Georg’s secret marriage to Zherebtsova and the fact that he was the father of Yegor Nord is known exclusively from the words of Olga Alexandrovna herself?
                And the fact that she became George’s mistress much later than the events described?
                Quote: vet
                This kind of money can be entrusted to pay the fees to the conspirators.

  11. 0
    30 November 2023 11: 55
    S. Chudanov. Assassination of Paul I on the night of March 11-12, 1801

    Where is the snuffbox in the picture? :))
    1. +2
      30 November 2023 11: 59
      Apparently, you need to ask Chudanov.
      But in general, this terrible “circus” in the emperor’s bedroom continued, as I understand it, for a very long time. Apparently, they haven’t reached the snuff box yet. Here is probably the episode (hereinafter quoted):
      The Tsar now behaved so confidently and boldly that the conspirators were again at a loss, but Bennigsen and Platon Zubov were already openly calling for reprisals against him.
  12. -1
    30 November 2023 19: 30
    A. Herzen, who himself never refused foreign money, had close ties with the Rothschild clan and, to call a spade a spade, was also that “foreign agent”.


    The author's position is clear.
    Well, I will also express my opinion.
    Paul I, like all the other Russian tsars, was a tyrant. And besides, a stupid tyrant, unlike, for example, Peter 1 or his mother. The apology for autocracy from some people sincerely amazes me.
    But Herzen was an intelligent man who really wanted the good of Russia. And also a good writer.

    ...From here you can see how basely and basely our liberals, entrenched in the slave-like “legal” press, slander Herzen, exalting Herzen’s weaknesses and keeping silent about his strengths. It is not Herzen’s fault, but his misfortune that he could not see the revolutionary people in Russia itself in the 40s. When he saw him in the 60s, he fearlessly sided with revolutionary democracy against liberalism. He fought for the victory of the people over tsarism, and not for a deal between the liberal bourgeoisie and the landowner tsar. He raised the banner of revolution.
    (c) In memory of Herzen, V.I. Lenin (1912)
  13. +2
    1 December 2023 17: 48
    The sad fate of the Russian Hamlet.
  14. -3
    1 December 2023 18: 01
    Britain secretly prepared the assassination of Paul and installed Alexander in his place. Which provoked the war with Napoleon. Moreover, he refused reparations in favor of Russia....
    But of course Herzen is to blame for everything..... 200 years have passed, and the fools still persist.
  15. Eug
    -1
    8 December 2023 20: 43
    Some historians consider Benningsen to be the culprit for the unclear outcome of the Battle of Borodino. Without the knowledge of Kutuzov, they moved regiments with a total number of about 17 soldiers from the place from where they were supposed to hit the flank of the advancing Khryantsuzs, to the lowland, where they became a convenient target for the Khryantsuz artillery. There is an analysis of this situation on Youtube; one can only guess how reliable it is. But if that's really the case, then
    Benningsen is one of the most sinister figures in Russian history...
    1. 0
      9 December 2023 14: 47
      By rank Benningsen did not come out to be “one of the figures of History.” Firstly, he was not even a Russian citizen..... And at the same time he participated in the murder of Paul and was elevated by Alexander. And he was appointed chief of staff of the army by Kutuzov. And he did a lot of things, having the rights given to him to do so.

      He did what he wanted, but if such a figure is given all the rights, the “sinister figure” is not him..... .
  16. 0
    12 December 2023 18: 19
    An anecdotal story - Pavel, all his life, was afraid of an assassination attempt - he built a special castle for himself - and a bunch of drunken officers calmly entered there and killed him - and they killed him in the most ridiculous way what
  17. -1
    April 23 2024 14: 11
    “For example, her protégé A. Herzen wrote about this, who himself never refused foreign money, had close ties with the Rothschild clan and, to call a spade a spade, was also that “foreign agent.” - Does the author himself sometimes not take money from the Rothschilds? Such things that he writes must be proven with documents.
    Especially if he wants to convince the reader that the Rothschilds did not throw money away, but received some benefit from Herzen........ Herzen hardly influenced the Russian peasants of the mid-19th century... and the Russian intelligentsia had no influence in Russia either , just like today. and what is the use of the Rothschilds?
  18. 0
    5 May 2024 23: 12
    A lot of interesting. Herzen's assessment is appropriate. Here is a Rothschild bell.
    Just like Marx and Engels.