What are you dreaming about, the cruiser "Kutuzov"

46
What are you dreaming about, the cruiser "Kutuzov"

There are actually quite a few such, or rather, similar museums, both in Russia, starting with the legendary Aurora, and throughout the world. People value glorious ships and are in no hurry to scrap many of them, even when they have served all their due dates.


The author only twice had the good fortune to be in the port of the hero city of Novorossiysk in the depths of Tsemes Bay. There, next to the maritime terminal, surrounded by several monuments overlooking the commercial port, barely swaying on the rare waves, the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov is laid up.



This cruiser of military glory served in the 50th division of the Red Banner Black Sea for almost forty years. fleet KChF turned out to be the last operational in the series of Project 68-bis cruisers. There were 14 of them, seven more could not be completed.

And here a fairly long retreat is simply necessary.


First of all, we need to separately recall who made it possible for the floating museum to appear in Novorossiysk, where everything even without the “Kutuzov” is literally covered in the military glory of past years. Malaya Zemlya, an impressive memorial to the sunken ships of the revolutionary fleet, and finally the Zubkov battery.

Back in 1994, veterans of the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov, by that time already enlisted in the KChF reserve, proposed preserving the ship as an example of domestic shipbuilding in the 50s, the era of the construction of the large ocean-going fleet of the USSR.


In the post-war years, cruisers that were not inferior, and in many respects superior to their foreign counterparts, were extremely necessary for the fleet. Among other things, in order to achieve superiority or at least equality in forces in the Baltic and Black Sea.

In 1999, the new Prime Minister Yevgeny Maksimovich Primakov responded to the ship’s veterans, and “Mikhail Kutuzov” became a branch of first the Black Sea Fleet Museum, and then the Central Naval Museum.

The author was able to visit the museum ship only last summer, when the line of visitors was very short.


Even before getting on board, I was slightly surprised that at the stern the wind unkindly fluttered a banner with an unexpected inscription - “Alexander Suvorov”. The guide on board enlightened us - every morning a banner with the name of another of the 68-bis series cruisers flies up the flagpole.

Without sparing space, I will name each and every one of them, each with an assignment to the fleet, or more precisely, to the fleets where they served.


"Sverdlov" – The Baltic Fleet, the authors of the famous reference book Jane's Fighting Ships named the entire series after it;
"Dzerzhinsky" - Black Sea Fleet;
"Ordzhonikidze" – Baltic Fleet;
"Zhdanov" – Baltic Fleet, Black Sea Fleet;
"Alexander Nevskiy" – Northern Fleet;
"Admiral Nakhimov" - Black Sea Fleet;
"Admiral Ushakov" – Baltic Fleet, Northern Fleet, Black Sea Fleet;
"Admiral Lazarev" – Baltic Fleet, Northern Fleet, Pacific Fleet;
"Alexander Suvorov" – Baltic Fleet, Northern Fleet, Pacific Fleet;
Admiral Senyavin – Northern Fleet, Pacific Fleet;
"Molotovsk" (“October Revolution”) – Northern Fleet, Baltic Fleet;
"Mikhail Kutuzov" - Black Sea Fleet;
"Dmitry Pozharsky" – Northern Fleet, Pacific Fleet;
"Murmansk" - Northern Fleet.


For me personally, there is a special one among them - this is “Admiral Ushakov”, the seventh in the series. On the Ushakov, Alexander Ivanovich Polyansky, his own uncle, the husband of his father’s sister, served his four naval years as a ship’s cook.


But this essay is not about him and not about “Admiral Ushakov,” but about “Mikhail Kutuzov,” and for the sake of completeness, it is necessary to continue with some generally known information.

The cruiser was enlisted in the Black Sea Fleet in the mid-50s of the last century.

Based in Sevastopol since January 1955, Mikhail Kutuzov became a testing ground for the ship's Ka-15 and Mi-1 helicopters. Under the flag of the commander of the Red Black Sea Fleet, Admiral V. A. Kasatonov, he made visits to the Balkan countries and Algeria.


When the battleship Novorossiysk (formerly the captured Italian Giulio Cesare) exploded in the Sevastopol roadstead on October 29, 1955, for a still unknown reason, it was the Mikhail Kutuzov that was closest to it.

A rescue team of 93 sailors from the cruiser was immediately sent to help the Novorossiysk crew. 27 sailors from the emergency party from the Kutuzov died saving the battleship damaged by the explosion, but it still sank in the port.

But, of course, that’s not why the cruiser ended up permanently moored in Novorossiysk. He was remembered there in September 1958, when the eternal flame from Sevastopol from Malakhov Kurgan arrived at the port on board the Mikhail Kutuzov. Throughout the 90s, the cruiser was based in Novorossiysk, becoming part of the local naval base.


In 1967, during the next Arab-Israeli war, the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov supported first the Egyptian and then the Syrian army from the sea. The famous exercise “Ocean” became another test for the crew. “Kutuzov” also starred in films, and it was from its board that Lev Prygunov’s hero received his “Shore Leave.”


The Mikhail Kutuzov Museum has been serving for three decades now. During this time, he only aged slightly, continuing to amaze with the grace of his lines and the famous naval order. And this, even without a crew, unless, of course, you count the duty crews and museum staff - the cruiser was included in the staff of the Peter the Great Central Naval Museum in 2012.

As soon as visitors overcome the not at all steep bridge, a pleasant surprise awaits them - the opportunity to hit the ship's bell. She is already over seventy, but she sounds so loudly that on a quiet day she can be heard on Malaya Zemlya, and even somewhere in Kabardinka - at the exit from Tsemes Bay.


On the cruiser itself, in addition to the powerful three-gun turrets, monumental chimneys, elegant superstructures and internal labyrinths with cockpits, engine room and everything that such a ship is supposed to have, there is one more thing that pleases us. This is a treasured memory!

It begins, perhaps, with a gallery of photographic portraits of those same cruisers from the 68 bis series. It continues with a series of portraits of naval commanders and ordinary heroes - sailors, foremen, captains and captains with ranks, most of whom managed to rise to admirals.


And one cannot help but note the particularly camp chair of Field Marshal Mikhail Illarionovich Golenishchev-Kutuzov, whose name this cruiser of military glory bears.

How did the chair end up on the cruiser? story separate, but here, in the cozy and elegant wardroom, in my opinion, is the most suitable place for him.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    11 November 2023 05: 31
    Everything is fine. But there are no technical characteristics of the cruiser.
    1. +15
      11 November 2023 06: 06
      I would add one more note - there are few photographs of the cruiser.
      Otherwise, good and kind article, thank you!
    2. -2
      11 November 2023 06: 45
      I was on this cruiser, technically it was out of date for the 50s. In general, his level is 1942
      1. +12
        11 November 2023 07: 23
        Quote: Clever man
        I was on this cruiser, technically it was out of date for the 50s. In general, his level is 1942

        In terms of armament, yes, but otherwise….. Debatable. At the time of Sverdlov's appearance, it was a fairly balanced cruiser based on the past war. However, this is the misfortune of all generals and admirals who were preparing for the past war, not the future.
        However, it must be admitted that the Soviet Union had two decisions: either build the fleet with weapons from the middle of the Great Patriotic War, or not build it at all. The first option is more preferable from a strategic point of view.
        1. +4
          11 November 2023 15: 06
          In terms of armament, yes, but otherwise….. Debatable.

          Electrical equipment on direct current, boiler rooms with pressurization into rooms, radar, sonar - I know this as a non-specialist. Experts will certainly add more.
        2. +2
          15 November 2023 20: 03
          So I read similar comments from armchair experts accusing Soviet generals and admirals of this and that, and then this and that, and I think - how did they win the war without you?
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +4
      12 November 2023 16: 03
      This article is not about performance characteristics but about memory. It’s not difficult to check the performance characteristics yourself.
    5. -4
      14 November 2023 08: 16
      In terms of? Are you saying that you don’t know them?! Hmmm!
  2. +11
    11 November 2023 05: 42
    There were 14 of them, seven more could not be completed

    In fact, Judas Khrushch simply sold them for scrap.
    And in the spring of 1956, during a visit to Portsmouth, Nikita gave a speech at dinner during which he suggested that the British buy the cruiser Ordzhonikidze because “it is outdated and its weapons are outdated.”
    1. +3
      11 November 2023 06: 47
      So the entire line of these cruisers is the level of 1942, if you focus on the world naval powers
      1. +2
        15 November 2023 20: 05
        Japan in those years had more aircraft carriers than all other countries in the world combined. Have you forgotten how the war ended for Tokyo?
        1. +1
          15 February 2024 07: 54
          Quote: Kasatik
          Japan in those years had more aircraft carriers than all other countries in the world combined. Have you forgotten how the war ended for Tokyo?

          Admiral Yamamoto said before the start of the war: “For the first 2 years I will advance and capture territories, but if the war lasts longer, we will lose.”
    2. +8
      11 November 2023 13: 08
      Yes, with Khrushchev, in fact, the decline of the USSR began... my grandfather reviled him with such Googleplexes... that mom, don’t worry feel And Brezhnev no less.
      Z.y. Grandfather - Hero of the USSR, radio operator-sniper, before that he was an artilleryman near Tula at 41, wounded. Riga was taken as part of 3 Krasnogvardeyskaya. 2 more wounds and Balaton and Kwantung.
    3. +2
      11 November 2023 13: 30
      Quote: Comrade
      In fact, Judas Khrushch simply sold them for scrap.
      And what's wrong with that? Outdated. The Amers also built only 3 Des Moines. And three of the newest battleships Montana were dismantled at the shipyards. Because everything: not yet built, but already outdated.
      1. +7
        12 November 2023 05: 38
        Quote: bk0010
        three of the newest battleships Montana were dismantled at the shipyards. Because everything: not yet built, but already outdated.

        They were not completed not because they were outdated, but because they were no longer needed. Why were they built if the Japanese fleet ceased to exist?

        - The obsolete battleship Iowa was withdrawn from the fleet in nineteen eighty-nine.
        - The obsolete battleship New Jersey was withdrawn from the fleet in nineteen ninety-one.
        - The obsolete battleship Missouri was withdrawn from the fleet in nineteen ninety-two.
        - The obsolete battleship Wisconsin was withdrawn from the fleet in nineteen ninety-one.
    4. +2
      11 November 2023 15: 08
      Judas Khrushch simply sold them for scrap.
      "It is outdated and its weapons are outdated."

      Well, in general, he was right.
      1. +4
        11 November 2023 16: 20
        I agree on the whole...then the era of missile weapons began. Battleships as such went into oblivion. In fact, fire support against coastal targets. Although, given the era of high-precision weapons right now... it is quite possible to make an analogue of the Krasnopol/Excalibur in this caliber. Here I think, given the cost, it can quite justify itself. But the price... what is more effective now is difficult to answer... an almost ton blank, which essentially cannot be shot down in any way, or a swarm of missiles that will overcome air defense... As always, the fight of sword and shield what
        1. +5
          11 November 2023 17: 19
          Quote from Enceladus
          Although, given the era of high-precision weapons right now... it is quite possible to make an analogue of the Krasnopol/Excalibur in this caliber. Here I think, given the cost, it can quite justify itself.
          The Americans tried to do this on Zumwalts. Even they were crazy about the prices. I don’t understand this desire to shoot a rocket from a cannon. Rocket boosters cost pennies compared to art. turret (taking into account the wear of the barrels), plus serious savings due to the requirements for electronics for overloads (tens of g, and not tens of thousands of g), plus freedom from restrictions on caliber, barrel length and loading means.
          1. +4
            11 November 2023 23: 09
            I don’t think the cost will change depending on the caliber... I meant the really serious 16 inches and higher, adjustable. And the Zumvolt is a cut of the dough and nothing more. With our Russian ingenuity, we would have cut down the Iowas for the price of a zoomvolt wink
            Eh Kaptsov is not enough for us laughing He is also an adept of battleships.
            The bottom line is... modern anti-ship missiles can only do something to a battleship with special warheads or, at most, damage the superstructure. 152mm is one thing, but 406mm at the same price? And technology does not stand still. And the resistance against nuclear weapons of battleships is amazing. Remember the same Nagato, who was at the epicenter and without a complete struggle for survivability, sank to the bottom only a few days later. There is only one problem - induced radiation what
            1. +3
              12 November 2023 01: 27
              Quote from Enceladus
              With our Russian ingenuity, we would have cut down the Iowas for the price of a zoomvolt wink
              With our Russian ingenuity, we will never saturate our fleets with corvettes. It’s good that at least they mastered a normal frigate.
              Quote from Enceladus
              modern anti-ship missiles for a battleship can only do something to a special warhead or, at most, damage the superstructure
              Battleships will appear, and there will be missiles for them. A penetrating warhead will reduce the amount of explosives delivered, but for such an expensive ship, even three times the number of missiles is not a pity. Let me just remind you that Granite was made with Iowa in mind. And, if necessary, armor-piercing anti-ship missiles will be repeated by any manufacturer of anti-ship missiles.
              Quote from Enceladus
              152mm is one thing, but 406mm at the same price?
              The price of 152mm and 406mm guns and shells varies monstrously. Moreover, 406mm guns make sense only for fighting battleships; for any other tasks they are monstrously expensive and redundant (well, they can also destroy a coastal fortress if you find one).
              Quote from Enceladus
              And the resistance against nuclear weapons of battleships is amazing.
              They do not have the slightest resistance: with the accuracy of today's missiles, the battleship will end up at the epicenter and evaporate along with the surface layer of water. In a fireball, everything turns to plasma.
              Quote from Enceladus
              Remember the same Nagato, who is at the epicenter
              Not at the epicenter, but 900 m from the explosion at 23 kT. With an explosion of 200 kT at 20 meters, the result would be completely different.
              1. +2
                12 November 2023 02: 21
                I agree here too. But damn, I want to see such espolins.
                Well, OK. And aircraft carriers. So, evaporating them is also not a problem at all... it’s enough even if there are special warheads nearby - and there, in fact, it’s cardboard.
                Aug resistance is only available in escort ships. Those, in theory, everything that the aug protects... can protect the same battleship. With current technologies, an active missile can fly 120-150 km and hit a window. I mean stratospheric flight, when the projectile itself is essentially thrown there - and then maneuvers at the top point. I'm talking about this. Mobile enough artillery platform. For Israel, which is essentially coastal, that would be enough. In general, the topic is interesting... if anything, the patent is mine laughing
                1. +4
                  12 November 2023 10: 43
                  Quote from Enceladus
                  Those, in theory, everything that the aug protects... can protect the same battleship.
                  Maybe. There is just one thing: battleships were viewed as an ultimate force that did not need to be defended, which determined the results of wars and the fate of continents, which only another battleship could resist. Only in this form did they agree to pay such crazy money for battleships. Therefore, when Japanese base aircraft sank the battleship and battlecruiser, the history of battleships ended. Some things were completed, the rest were dismantled. Only one new battleship was built - the English Vanguard with second-hand ones instead of new guns, and that was all.
                  Quote from Enceladus
                  With current technologies, an active missile can fly 120-150 km and hit a window.
                  Maybe. But GPS guidance will not help in this matter: the target is moving and maneuvering, and the projectile flies over a long range for quite a long time (minutes). Laser illumination would help, but who will provide it? There is also shipboard air defense. It is necessary to make a projectile with an active seeker, but this is expensive, and it will be difficult to make a radar that is resistant to overloads. Plus, you will need to add an optical channel, since the ship has electronic warfare.
                  1. +1
                    12 November 2023 14: 31
                    We start from the fact that now a battleship cannot be an ultimatum in modern conditions, well, no matter how, only against the Pupuas. Protection is needed, both air and missile defense - i.e. in any case, this is a reinforcement of the AUG or its own group. Yes, the projectile flies for a long time - but nothing can be done against it, unlike the missile launcher. All long-range artillery always suffered from a lack of accuracy and was fired at cities, and they weighed hundreds of tons. Therefore, as a class, they also disappeared into oblivion after World War II. But the battleship is ideal as a carrier here - it displaces tens of thousands of tons. I don’t think that such a projectile will cost more than a missile launcher, especially a hypersonic one. In general, there are progressively burning gunpowders that can provide almost constant pressure in the barrel + charges can be placed along the way (yes, this also happened in history, I don’t remember the name of the guy who made the gun for Hussein, Emnip was later killed by SAS) . In general, this is how I throw my thoughts at the fan. what It’s just that with current technology it doesn’t look like science fiction at all. If we assume that we manage to maintain 1 km/s up to the stratosphere. It turns out that if, for example, we can shoot about 300 km... then the flight time is 6-7 minutes... well, let’s say roughly 10, a very fast target will have time to swim 10 km + - well, let’s say we have another battleship 350 meters in length - the same 30/1 from its length is obtained. At such a range, adjusting 1/30 is not a problem at all (c). In addition, the blank will fall almost vertically - you can file the same impact core into it what And speaking of stationary coastal objects, you can hit them inland at 100-200 km. Those. Having solved the problem with electronics, we will get an incoming blank with a falling speed of 2 km/s, which, without an explosive, is capable of penetrating anything and against which not a single modern weapon will help. What is not an ultimatum good

                    The nose smells a minus on my wild fan laughing drinks
                    1. 0
                      2 May 2024 08: 22
                      What do you mean you can’t do anything against a flying projectile? A close detonation of ammunition will definitely change the ballistics of the projectile. Draw conclusions. Air defense missiles, and all sorts of anti-missiles, that’s why they are fragmentation missiles, because detonations often occur at a distance. They will also fight with blanks.
                      1. 0
                        2 May 2024 10: 36
                        Here they can’t cope with drones at speeds of 120 km/h lol then here is a hundred-kilogram blockhead with supersonic speed throughout the entire trajectory recourse
          2. 0
            2 May 2024 08: 14
            What missiles, from what gun? Zumwalt’s artillery should hit with blanks accelerated to mega speeds.. Zumwalt’s guns don’t have barrels at all..
            1. 0
              2 May 2024 20: 23
              Quote: Igor Viktorovich
              Zumwalt’s artillery should hit with blanks accelerated to mega speeds..
              No, they were not going to install gauss cannons, but if they were able to be made, a reserve of electricity was provided for them.
              Quote: Igor Viktorovich
              Zumwalt guns don't have barrels at all...
              The barrels, and not very large ones, are only 155 mm caliber. But the loading system is unusual - it is designed for very long projectiles.
              1. 0
                3 May 2024 17: 16
                That is why there are no barrels, but guides for the blanks.
                1. 0
                  3 May 2024 20: 35
                  Quote: Igor Viktorovich
                  That is why there are no barrels, but guides for the blanks.
                  On what basis do you claim this? Please provide a link.
    5. 0
      2 May 2024 08: 08
      Judas Khrushchev, as you put it, invested the forces of the union in rocket science, and riveted thousands of nuclear charges and missiles for them. This is the only reason why you are now writing here on a Russian website, in Russian. Yes, he may have done this to the detriment of the fleet, and he turned out to be one hundred percent right. If it weren’t for our missiles and strategic nuclear forces, our end would have come back in the 90s.. But Operation “Behemoth” showed the adversaries that “Judas Khrushchev” missiles could be reached anywhere, and by the way, “Judas Khrushchev” did not touch the submarine. So be careful in your thoughtless and stupid statements.
  3. +8
    11 November 2023 07: 22
    "Kutuzov" was lucky. But there is no one-type “Murmansk”.
    1. +6
      11 November 2023 08: 18
      If we look back, in the mid-50s of the last century, we could have preserved a number of interesting warships for posterity.
      It’s a particular pity: the first turret battleship of the Russian Navy is Peter the Great.
  4. +11
    11 November 2023 08: 54
    cruisers pr.68 bis, in their “architectural aesthetics” are one of the most beautiful surface ships of their time. During the Brezhnev era, I had the honor of serving in military service on the then flagship of the DKBF "Sverdlov" and then looking with horror at photographs of how completely rusty cruisers of this project under Gorbachev were dragged across the seas by tugboats so that businessmen could sell them for scrap metal. Maybe the fleet suffered something from this, since under Gorbachev not only the army but also the fleet simply died. So the cruiser "Mikhail Kutuzov" was very lucky that it became a museum. Although, in truth, the cruisers pr.68 bis should have been sent to museums already when Sverdlov served - 1973-1976. Light artillery cruisers gave way to ships with missile weapons.
    In fiction about the cruiser "Sverdlov" you can read my unloved but talented Mikhail Weller in one of the stories "Legends of Nevsky Prospekt" in the story "Legend of the Naval Parade", and in architecture the cruiser Sverdlov is famous for being at the Ploshchad Revolyutsii metro station “The face of the sailor signalman is the face of Olympius Rudakov, the future commander of the cruiser Sverdlov, and when he posed for the sculptor, then only a Red Navy man from the battleship Marat. Well, about the facts, legends and stories about how Rudakov moored the cruiser "Sverdlov" during a visit to England for the coronation of Queen Elizabeth, you all know about this.
    ps
    There are photographs on the Internet of the current state of the upper deck of the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov. She is in terrible condition. Here we still need to decide, because in the museum it shouldn’t be worse than it was before the museum... but who will now scrub this wooden deck on this ship as they scrubbed the same one in their time on the "Kutuzov" on the "Sverdlov" .. ... the issue also requires a solution, so as not to dishonor the memory of these beautiful Soviet warships.
    1. +4
      11 November 2023 15: 13
      There are photographs on the Internet of the current state of the upper deck of the cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov.

      I saw her live a few years ago. But I can’t imagine how to repair it at the lowest cost (because if it’s expensive, our bosses would rather write off the ship for scrap than allocate money)... However, under the USSR they repaired the same thing.
  5. +9
    11 November 2023 09: 00
    The picture, which is hand-drawn (side and top view), was actually taken from some alternative site belay request
    Author, you need to be more careful when choosing illustrations Yes
    Such a “monster” did not exist in nature wink laughing
    1. +4
      11 November 2023 14: 13
      Well, yes, it’s complete bullshit. Probably from althistories.
  6. +4
    11 November 2023 16: 38
    The Mikhail Kutuzov Museum has been serving for three decades now. During this time, he only aged slightly, continuing to amaze with the grace of his lines and the famous naval order.

    Another portion of Podymovism, far from reality.
    The cruiser has such a look that “naval order” cannot be found there even during the day with a searchlight.



    Ship hull. Rust, peeling paint.

    The author, apparently, in his agitprop enthusiasm, never bothered to find out that the residents of Novorossiysk were collecting money for the repair of the cruiser-museum “Mikhail Kutuzov”.



    A dried out deck, the sight of which would immediately give anyone associated with the Navy an apoplexy.



    Internal premises where tourists are not taken.
    1. 0
      13 November 2023 20: 21
      Looking at the photo of the interior, I immediately remembered the movie “The Way to the Pier”...
  7. -2
    13 November 2023 16: 48
    Quote from Enceladus

    The bottom line is... modern anti-ship missiles for a battleship can only do something with a special warhead or, at most, damage the superstructure


    Remind me which of the Yamato hits penetrated the main belt. And why did he drown?
  8. 0
    15 November 2023 08: 33
    The cruiser's problems were discussed closely on the website
    https://topwar.ru/121684-kreyser-mihail-kutuzov-o-korable-i-shvatke-za-nego.html
    Unfortunately, in fact, the volume of problems has probably only grown, although there was a chance, but with the current problems, as the Ukrainians say, “not on time” (not on time).
  9. +2
    15 November 2023 13: 28
    I had to be on a cruiser. Well done to those who save it!
  10. 0
    15 November 2023 15: 31
    I was in this museum, I recommend everyone to visit, it’s very interesting and informative, it’s good that there are such... It would be nice to organize something similar from our decommissioned underwater strategists
  11. IC
    -1
    15 November 2023 18: 59
    The cruiser has never been based in Novorossiysk. At the time of the creation of the NVMB, the ship had long been mothballed in Sevastopol. This series, built in the 50s, was morally outdated at the time of completion. Moreover, the main caliber did not meet the requirements of a ship with such a displacement. But they were very beautiful ships, especially for visits and parades.
  12. +1
    5 February 2024 07: 50
    On summer evenings there is always a special atmosphere around the cruiser.
  13. 0
    22 February 2024 11: 44
    Well, now Kaptsov will come and write that he has armor... so we need to quickly send this ship to the Northern Military District.
  14. 0
    22 March 2024 11: 56
    It’s a pity that Khrushchev sawed up Stalingrad. Oddly enough, I don’t remember exactly in 1972 or 82. Crisis in the Middle East. both cruisers and EMSs ran after aircraft carriers for the first strike, and then aviation arrives... and now imagine: not 152mm. threatens take-off decks and hangars and 305mm./60klb.... The story of Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, who sank the AB in the conditions of the Eastern Mediterranean, would be repeated in an internal limited and closed basin. Another thing is that logistics is often more important than tactics and it was necessary to carry oil from the Black Sea..... And the shelling of the coast was 305 to 460 kg effective. By the way, the range was at the level of 50 km or more and, of course, dispersion by special ammunition... + technologies are developing and, roughly speaking, correction is not news for a long time...