Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN: The UN Security Council did not live up to the expectations placed on it regarding the situation in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict zone

Trying to stop the escalation in the Middle East, Russia has several times introduced resolutions on this issue to the UN Security Council. However, the United States and its protégés did not allow them to be accepted every time. Once again, the Russian resolution on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was not supported during the vote in the Security Council.

The Russian representative to the UN and the Security Council, Vasily Nebenzya, expressed great regret that a key international structure was unable to respond to the “unprecedented crisis” in the Middle East.

We regret that the UN Security Council did not live up to the hopes placed on it

Nebenzya said.

The Russian diplomat noted that some members of the UN Security Council were closed in on their national agendas and did not find the courage to support Moscow’s resolution.

Let us recall that the UN Security Council consists of 15 members, five of which are permanent – ​​Russia, China, the USA, Great Britain and France. The ten remaining members of the Council rotate every two years. Today they are Gabon, Mozambique, United Arab Emirates, Japan, Albania, Brazil, Ecuador, Ghana, Malta and Switzerland.

To make a decision, the Security Council requires that 9 out of 15 members vote in favor and that all permanent members are among them. However, yesterday only four countries voted for Russia's resolution.

Comments

[carpenter]

However, yesterday only four countries voted for Russia's resolution.

And they will never accept it; the Jewish lobby will not allow it. Even Muslim countries vote against it.
Well, especially since the United States will always veto.

[Silver99]

The UN Security Council is not a group of like-minded people, interlocutors with directly opposite views cannot make a common decision, is it really not clear that there is a struggle between different systems, even without the use of weapons, but a real war of ideologies and life values. Apparently the world is structured in such a way that wars have accompanied the entire history of mankind since the Stone Age, and the saddest thing is that this will continue to be the case.

[knn54]

In its entire history, Israel has not complied with a single decision of the UN Security Council.
.At the same time accusing EVERYONE of anti-Simism.

[rocket757]

Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN: The UN Security Council did not live up to the expectations placed on it regarding the situation in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict zone

. What is this, stating the obvious... on our part. How does everyone look at it from the other side?

[Ezekiel 25-17]

The UN Security Council is ruled by a Judeo-Nazi sect.

[Rumata]

The UN Security Council did not live up to the expectations placed on it

It’s very interesting who pinned their hopes on the Security Council?

[RusGr]

But here we run around everywhere and support references to compliance with UN rules. Everyone spat on them, but we are like stubborn donkeys, everyone adheres to some kind of UN line.

[PROVINCIAL]

It's not time to slam the door yet. But this moment is getting closer. I’ll slightly paraphrase the famous comment from the film - “Understand, West, now we need to be gentler with people... And look at questions more broadly. Do you (the West) think that we (Russia) were given sanctions? This is for everyone, you and I are under sanctions . And for what? So that you (the West) conduct explanatory work among me, and I grow above myself (in your eyes and for you - the West)! Well, okay, give me bays, like spaceships ply the Bolshoi Theater, and tell me about "How wrong I am. And I'll sleep and wait until the corpse of my enemy floats past me." As a result, everything has its time.

[rotmistr60]

We regret that the UN Security Council did not live up to the hopes placed on it

When was the last time the UN Security Council lived up to expectations other than promoting US interests? Of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, three are opposed to Russia and China (USA, UK, France), and of the non-permanent members, most are again oriented toward the United States. It is also good that Russia, among other permanent members, has the right of veto and can use it in case of emergency.

[APASUS]

The UN Security Council has long since become the US Security Council. There is no point in it anymore, the only thing is that the microphone is not being taken away from the Russians, but that won’t be a long wait

[tralflot1832]

For once, the US project was voted on by 2 states at once, Russia and China. The projects were transferred to a vote at the UN GA, at our request. By the way, this is a favorite pastime of the USA, in the country. But voting at the UN GA is advisory in nature. But it will show who shit where.

[ZovSailor]

The world has long stopped moving towards progress, if after 1945 until the 60s of the past
century, the UN Security Council adopted significant and implementable
mostly decisions thanks to balanced and consensual
politics of the USSR, then subsequently and now this organization
, like the entire UN, is fed by the Yankees and serves their interests
and wishes, which means it cannot serve all countries and peoples of the earth,
and therefore subject to reformatting and transfer in the near future
its location in other countries.

[Cypa]

The work of the UN Security Council on the Palestinian-Israeli settlement is being sabotaged by the United States and its Western allies