Yevno Azef, “king of provocateurs”

73
Yevno Azef, “king of provocateurs”

The head of the terrorist organization of the Social Revolutionaries and part-time highly paid agent of the Okhrana, Yevno Azef, received the nickname “king of provocateurs of the XNUMXth century.” The name of the hero of the article became a household name, and Mark Aldanov called him a man who was “in a transitional stage to a boa constrictor.”

However, historians are still arguing about who used whom to a greater extent in this dirty game: the leaders of Azef’s Security Department or, on the contrary, Azef his curators? And his whistleblower Vladimir Burtsev, who later met him abroad, claimed that Azef told him that he was seriously preparing the murder of Nicholas II - and it turns out that the “Sherlock Holmes of the Russian Revolution” objectively played on the side of the tsarist regime that he despised.



It’s easy to believe in Azef’s double game if we remember that it was the secret informant of the Security Department, Dmitry Bogrov, who mortally wounded the Prime Minister of the Russian Empire, Pyotr Stolypin, on September 1 (14), 1911. And the pass to the theater was given to him by the head of the Kyiv security department, N. N. Kulyabko, with the consent of P. G. Kurlov, comrade (deputy) Minister of Internal Affairs, head of the police and commander of a separate corps of gendarmes.

Already in our memory, Yuri Andropov stepped on the same rake, under which the KGB introduced many of its agents into the ranks of dissidents and nationalists, or recruited existing ones. But instead of completely defeating these destructive organizations, department employees simply followed their activities with interest, moreover, they financed them along with Western intelligence services.

After the collapse of the USSR, many former KGB agents made very successful careers in the new Russophobic states. For example, the President of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaite and the Prime Minister of the same country Kazimir Prunskienė, as well as the former Prime Minister of Latvia Ivars Godmanis, are accused of working for the KGB.

The KGB informant was also People's Artist of the USSR Donatas Banionis, who in the 90s repeatedly claimed that he did not love the USSR and “received nothing from the Soviet government.”


D. Banionis - People's Artist of the USSR, twice laureate of the USSR State Prize, holder of the Order of the October Revolution and the Red Banner of Labor, who “received nothing from the Soviet government”

On the other hand, the fate of Azef can serve as an illustration of Lev Gumilyov’s thesis that for the full realization of a passionate person, a suitable environment (his own ethnic field) is required - he must act, if not in his homeland, then at least as part of the expeditionary army of his state, a band of explorers , Viking squads, a detachment of conquistadors and so on. Being isolated, he becomes like the mythical Antaeus, whom Hercules easily defeated by depriving him of contact with the soil that nurtured him.

Indeed, in exile Azef suddenly turned out to be a boring and unremarkable man in the street. The same fate awaited Nestor Makhno in Paris, Leon Trotsky in Mexico and Bonaparte's rival Victor Moreau in the USA. But in this article we will talk specifically about Yevno Azef.

Yevno Azef: the path to the Social Revolutionaries and provocateurs


Yevno Fishelevich Azef (who preferred to call himself Evgeny Filippovich) was born in 1869 in the town of Lyskovo (Volkovysk district, Grodno province) into a poor Jewish family. His father worked as a tailor, his mother kept house (according to some sources, she abandoned her children and ran away from her husband who beat her).

The boy, who was destined to become the head of the Social Revolutionary Combat Organization and a famous provocateur, was the second child of either six or seven children. His childhood was spent in Rostov-on-Don, where his parents moved. Here Evno studied at a real school, where he became a member of an underground circle, which included mainly Jews.

After graduating from this educational institution, Azef worked wherever he had to, even in a traveling tent. Finally, I decided to go study abroad. Since he did not have his own funds, he borrowed 800 rubles from some Mariupol merchant. He was not going to repay the debt, considering it not theft, but “revolutionary expropriation.”

In 1892 we see him as a student at the Karlsruhe Polytechnic Institute - and a member of a Social Democratic circle organized by Russian students. At that time he was 23 years old.


Azef among Russian students in Karslruhe - sitting third from left

However, the Mariupol merchant’s money soon ran out, Azef had no other means of livelihood, and therefore already in 1893 he addressed the Police Department with a letter in which he offered his services to the Okhrana as a paid informant. He did not sign, but the anonymous police official demonstrated the capabilities of his department by answering him:

“I think I won’t be mistaken in calling you, Mr. Azef, by your name?”

Azef was assigned a “salary” of 50 rubles per month (the monthly salary of a worker in St. Petersburg at that time was 20–25 rubles), but “bonuses” were also paid for Christmas and Easter. Now Azef lived, although not richly, but not in need either.


Yevno Azef, photograph from the 1890s.

In 1895, in Darmstadt, he met Lyubov Grigorievna Menkina, the daughter of the owner of a stationery store from Mogilev, who was then studying at the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Bern and along the way became interested in revolutionary ideas. In 1896, Azef and Menkina entered into a marriage that turned out to be unhappy. However, the wife still gave birth to two children from Azef.
In 1899, having completed his studies, Azef returned to Russia, joined the Socialist Revolutionary Party and got a job as an engineer at one of the Moscow factories. He sent his reports under the pseudonym “Engineer Raskin.”


“Engineer Raskin”, archival photo

A document has been preserved describing the information supplied by Azef:

“The messages are striking in their accuracy in the complete absence of reasoning.”

Azef’s supervisor was the famous Sergei Zubatov, the head of the Moscow security department, the author of the idea of ​​​​creating trade unions controlled by the police.

It is curious that later Zubatov’s trusted employee, Leonid Petrovich Menshchikov, a former Narodnaya Volya member who became a senior assistant clerk at the Police Department, went over to the side of the revolution. He headed the “table” that controlled the activities of all security departments in the country. In 1907, Menshchikov retired and, under the pseudonym Ivanov, was actively involved in exposing provocateurs embedded in the revolutionary environment.

In total, he identified about 2 of them, including 000 Social Democrats, 90 Bundists, 34 Socialist Revolutionaries, 28 Polish revolutionaries, 75 Caucasians and 45 Finns. But he did not have the talent for self-PR, which Burtsev fully possessed, and therefore his name is known only to specialists involved in the study stories those years. Not even a photograph of this man has survived.

Social Revolutionaries


The Socialist Revolutionary Party (SRs), as you know, took organizational form at the end of 1901. Back in 1894, in Saratov (which was then one of the main centers of the revolutionary movement in Russia), A. A. Argunov created the first circle of followers of the defeated Narodnaya Volya, which was called the “Union of Socialist Revolutionaries.” Later he moved to Moscow.

By the way, it was on Argunov’s recommendation that Azef was accepted into the ranks of the future Socialist Revolutionaries back in 1899.


Andrei Aleksandrovich Argunov, nobleman, founder of the Saratov circle “Union of Socialists-Revolutionaries”, in the future – deputy of the Constituent Assembly from the Socialist Revolutionary Party


The emblem of the Social Revolutionaries in 1917

Soon similar circles appeared in St. Petersburg, Penza, Poltava, Voronezh, Kharkov, and Odessa. Some of them belonged to the “Southern Socialist Revolutionary Party”, others to the “Union of Socialist Revolutionaries”, and there was also the Geneva “Agrarian Socialist League”. As already mentioned, they all united at the end of 1901; in January 1902, the illegal newspaper “Revolutionary Russia” announced the creation of a new party (one of its printing houses in Tomsk was destroyed in 1901 following Azef’s denunciation).

The main ideologist of the Socialist Revolutionary Party was V. M. Chernov, who, by the way, in 1918 became the chairman of the Constituent Assembly, which met from 4 pm to 5 am on January 18–19 (and then, as you remember, “the guard was tired” ).

The Socialist Revolutionaries, who can safely be called the direct heirs of the Narodnaya Volya members, considered the main driving force of the revolution to be numerous peasants - and not workers, like the Social Democrats. Tsarist Russia was an agricultural country with poorly developed industry, and therefore it is not surprising that it was the Socialist Revolutionaries who enjoyed the greatest support among the population.

They continued the Narodnaya Volya tradition of terror against the highest officials of the state. This was their fundamental difference from other terrorist groups. After all, the “motiveless” anarchists (supporters of “motiveless class terror”), for example, believed that the revolution could be brought closer by killing simply decently dressed people, among whom could be not landowners or “bourgeois”, but doctors, university professors, engineers, architects and so on.

Killing such people, of course, was much easier and safer than organizing assassination attempts on the emperor, the minister of internal affairs or the governor general - which was what the Social Revolutionary Combat Organization, which was modeled after the Executive Committee of the People's Will, had been doing for 10 years. Its charter was written by Narodnaya Volya member Mikhail Gots.


Mikhail Rafailovich Gots

By the way, historians have calculated that from 1905 to May 1, 1909, terrorists of all stripes killed 2 people and wounded 691 people.

The first leader of the Socialist-Revolutionary Combat Organization was Grigory Gershuni, whose photograph was placed on his desk by the Minister of Internal Affairs V.K. Plehve, and whom S. Zubatov called “an artist in the cause of terror.” He outlined his goals and priorities as follows:

“The militant organization not only commits an act of self-defense, but also acts offensively, bringing fear and disorganization into the ruling spheres.”


G. Gershuni

V. Chernov wrote about him:

“Gershuny demanded from the revolution the same thing that humane people demand from commanders. Avoid unnecessary casualties, spare the vanquished, respect the interests and lives of neutrals. He was enthusiastic about the act of Kalyaev, who, having come out with a bomb against Grand Duke Sergei, retreated when he saw his wife and children next to him.”

Let us note that the Moscow homosexual governor-general Sergei Alexandrovich did not have children - his nephews sat next to his wife (Grand Duchess Elizaveta Feodorovna, the elder sister of Empress Alexandra). Struck by Kalyaev’s nobility, Elizaveta Feodorovna forgave him and turned to Nicholas II with a request to pardon her husband’s killer, but was refused.


Wounded Ivan Kalyaev after the terrorist attack, which nevertheless took place on February 4, 1905 - “his entire underwear was covered with pieces of wood, there were shreds hanging, and it was all burnt, blood flowed profusely from his face.”

The hero of the article, Yevno Azef, became Gershuni’s successor. After his exposure, the place of the head of the Combat Organization was taken by Azef’s deputy, the famous Boris Savinkov, who declared the need to restore the “honor of terror.” And it turned out that he acts much less effectively than the provocateur Azef: all the terrorist acts he prepared ended in failure. As a result, the Combat Organization of the Socialist Revolutionary Party was dissolved at the beginning of 1911. But we've gotten too far ahead.

Revolutionary career of Yevno Azef


The leaders of the Security Department valued Azef very much and constantly increased his salary, which eventually reached a thousand rubles a month, twice the general's salary. Meanwhile, Azef’s salary in the Socialist Revolutionary Party never exceeded 125 rubles a month.

The curators did their best to promote Azef’s career in the Socialist Revolutionary Party: he created underground circles, organized the unimpeded transportation of illegal literature, and even made dynamite. It is not surprising that Azef quickly gained authority among the leaders of the Socialist Revolutionary Party. The leaders of the Police Department allowed the “especially valuable employee” Azef to join the Combat Organization - and he immediately took an active part in preparing the assassination attempt on the Minister of Internal Affairs D. Sipyagin.

Azef reported to his curators:

“I took an active role in the Socialist Revolutionary Party. Retreating now is no longer beneficial for our cause.”

At Sipyagin’s funeral, Gershuni planned an assassination attempt on the Chief Prosecutor of the Synod, Pobedonostsev, and the Governor-General of St. Petersburg, Kleigels, but the perpetrators failed. Then Gershuni organized an assassination attempt on the Kharkov governor I. Obolensky (who was wounded) and the Ufa governor N. Bogdanovich (killed).

Azef's own game


There is every reason to believe that already in 1901 Azef left the control of the Security Department. Now he did not report everything he knew, but only what he considered “necessary.” Some of the information he supplied was true, others were in the nature of misinformation. He “surrendered” to the police not only ordinary Socialist Revolutionaries; among those handed over to him were, for example, all members of the first Central Committee, as well as revolutionaries from other parties.

Among those arrested on his tip was, for example, M. Vedenyapin-Stegeman, who later, while in exile near Penza, discovered the skeleton of a mosasaurus there. Extradited by Azef to A. Yakimova-Dyakovskaya was a member of the Executive Committee of the People's Will, a member of the famous “Freedom or Death” group, took part in the preparation of assassination attempts on Alexander II, joined the Socialist Revolutionary Party in 1904, and participated in the First Russian Revolution. In 1922, she was elected a member of the presidium of the central council of the Society of Former Political Prisoners and Exiled Settlers.


Anna Vasilievna Yakimova-Dikovskaya, photograph taken around 1883.

Another victim of Azef’s denunciation was a member of the RSDLP, G.I. Lomov (Oppokov), the future People’s Commissar of Justice, Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Economic Council, Deputy Chairman of the State Planning Committee of the USSR.

But Azef carefully protected other leaders of the Socialist Revolutionaries and especially his personally selected subordinates (the same Savinkov). He tried to get rid of other provocateurs, whom he mercilessly handed over to members of the Combat Group for execution, and handed over double agents who worked for both sides to the Okhrana.

In this way, firstly, he increased his importance (and even irreplaceability) in the eyes of his curators, and secondly, he tried to protect himself from exposure. So, in particular, it was at Azef’s suggestion that the famous Georgy Gapon, the leader of the “Meeting of Russian Factory Workers of St. Petersburg” and the organizer of the popular march on January 9, 1905, was killed by the Socialist Revolutionaries. But on July 5 of that year, Azef refused to confirm that the organizer of Gapon’s murder, Rutenberg, was carrying out the party’s orders.


Georgy Apollonovich Gapon

Azef, as we remember, not only allowed the Minister of Internal Affairs D. Sipyagin to be killed (in April 1902), but also gave the organizer of this attempt, Grigory Gershuni, an opportunity to escape: he reported his name only after he had gone abroad. Moreover, he tore off 500 rubles from the Police Department, which he allegedly spent to find out the name of the head of the Combat Group.

There were still rumors among the Socialist Revolutionaries that someone from the party leadership had been recruited by the Okhrana, but Azef remained above suspicion. Later Mark Aldanov wrote about him:

“He staged several terrorist attacks. He kept some of them in deep secret from the Police Department with the expectation that they would certainly succeed. These murders, organized by him and successful, insured him from the suspicions of the revolutionaries...
Azef disclosed the other part of the planned terrorist acts to the Police Department in a timely manner so that there could be no suspicion there either. Each side was convinced that he was devoted to it with all his soul.”

In the next article we will talk about Azef’s activities as head of the Socialist Revolutionary Combat Organization, his exposure, flight abroad and life in exile.
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 October 2023 04: 50
    Already in our memory, Yuri Andropov stepped on the same rake, under whom the KGB introduced many of its agents into the ranks of dissidents and nationalists

    And in my opinion, the legendary 5th Directorate of the KGB worked very well, introducing its agents into the dissident environment that was corrupting the state. Very Zubatov-esque. I don’t even rule out that Zubatov’s methods were completely transferred to the work of the KGB’s ideological counterintelligence...

    And further. How could a Jewish family, having passed the residency requirement, move from the Belarusian town to a large Russian city?
    1. +5
      12 October 2023 05: 45
      Well, yes, the KGB under Andropov worked so well with the nationalists that in a couple of years later they collapsed the USSR. It turned out that Ukraine is full of Banderaites. And in Soviet Lviv, sellers pretended that they did not understand Russian. Were any measures taken? The Baltic states were full of admirers of the SS men and “forest brothers.” A fellow student from Kaliningrad told me: a Russian can live in Lithuania - if you close your eyes and plug your ears.
      In Georgia, even under Brezhnev, locals openly told tourists: this is not Russia for you, we have our own laws. And it is correctly written that KGB agents in the republics were actually fooling Andropov and were waiting for an opportunity to show their true colors.
      1. +6
        12 October 2023 05: 50
        Quote: vet
        Well, yes, the KGB worked so well with the nationalists that they destroyed the USSR in a couple of years.

        We must not forget that the KGB is an instrument of the party. And what the party ordered, they did. She ordered not to touch anyone, they didn’t touch them - that’s why all these Sobchak, priests, Stankevichs and other loudmouth shitcrats divorced immediately with the beginning of perestroika...
        1. +4
          12 October 2023 06: 22
          By the way, it was Andropov who patronized Gorbachev and could not see the rot in this man.
          1. +4
            12 October 2023 07: 16
            I couldn't see the rot in this man.
            It's not about rot. Gorby was simply not competent for such a high position; his limit was the chairman of a collective farm or the head of an elevator.
          2. +1
            12 October 2023 14: 56
            Absolutely right. Andropov dragged Gorbachev into the Politburo. The boss at the “Kontor” was good, he didn’t understand people at all. negative
        2. 0
          12 October 2023 11: 46
          Quote: Luminman

          We must not forget that the KGB is an instrument of the party. And what the party ordered, they did. .

          It's best not to forget what it was like according to law the state structure of the USSR (the highest power belonged to the Soviets, and not to the party, and the KGB was also subordinated not to the party, but to the Council of Ministers).

          And don’t forget that our society has lived under a monarchy for hundreds of years, no matter what laws are declared in it. A political party in such a society is a simulation.
          Reality - the Tsar and his boyars.

          The day before yesterday they were, as it were, “Soviet and with the party”, yesterday Yeltsin became Tsar - they immediately became anti-Soviet, today - as if “patriotic” and the President is generally non-partisan (except that he was a member of the CPSU), and tomorrow no one knows.

          We do not live in a state, but in a simulation of it. For example, where do we get ministers from? It is only in Britain that ministers are nominated by the ruling party from among the (elected) MPs in the House of Commons. And approved by the monarch. But our President says something else: “the depths of the government are as deep as the depths of an oil well.” In short, eat the “dear Russians” that I gave you and don’t speak out. Where they were taken from is none of your business. laughing

          PS According to our Constitution, we have a republican system, but monarchists speak both on the Internet and on TV, although in a republic they should be in “sunny Magadan”.
          1. -2
            12 October 2023 17: 12
            "'Located in sunny Magadan" Ivan, you caught me: I like Ekaterina 2 and Pavel, partially Nikolai 1 (he is generally decent).
            But in Russia we need a smoothly changing vertical, with elements of autocracy.
            Perhaps not everyone will understand, but I will try to explain the situation allegorically: there is a storm now, and we are sailing on some kind of boat in the night. There are 3 options: the helmsman, hit something heavy on the head and overboard, and then the fuss will start: turning back, row to the right, I said straight.
            2) raise the white flag and shout SOS
            3) a couple of skipper's assistants, sailors. Let the boat get to land, and think there, think WELL. What should I do?
            The most terrible 1st option. I’m already silent about the bloodshed: “people’s blood is not water, it doesn’t change color” (C) as a result of such evasive actions, the boat can capsize and it’s good if they drown: unfortunate skippers. They can swim out. You yourself know that it doesn’t drown..
            Ordinary passengers can drown.
            Option 2. Other people's ships will pull us out, but the division of our wallets, clothes and ourselves will begin: this one will work like an ox, this one will not be able to work, but his throat will crush his own and lick his boots.
            Whatever you want, I’m afraid of a sudden change of course, I’m no longer 7 or 17 years old, when my whole life is ahead of me.
            I also don’t regret being assessed like an animal: how I will work
            The first and second options do not suit me.
            Valery, I’m sorry that I’m talking off topic, but I’ve been looking for a reason to throw out my thoughts for a long time
          2. 0
            13 October 2023 16: 26
            Quote: ivan2022
            We do not live in a state, but in a simulation of it.

            Don't confuse God's gift with scrambled eggs - we live in a state with a simulation of Western institutions.
      2. +4
        12 October 2023 08: 04
        This means there was no totalitarianism in the USSR, which the enemies of the USSR “liberated” by Gorbachev love to squeal about?
      3. -1
        12 October 2023 15: 54
        “Andropov was fooled” in this case, he is not up to par as a leader. A smart leader is difficult to deceive.
        We have a leader: a member of the United Russia, scolds Yeltsin, a leader with a nasty character, a tough leader, but there is a +: you have to try very hard to deceive him, and even then there is no guarantee
        1. +2
          12 October 2023 17: 20
          A smart leader is difficult to deceive.


          That's right!

          Good evening, Katya! love
    2. +8
      12 October 2023 07: 16
      How could a Jewish family, having bypassed the residency requirement, move from a Belarusian town to a large Russian city?

      Something else is more surprising here - Azef was born in 1869 in the town of Lyskovo, Grodno province, the second child in a large family of a poor Jewish tailor. Nevertheless, he manages to graduate from a real school in Rostov-on-Don! And since 1891 he is already studying abroad to become an engineer at the German Polytechnic Institute of Karlsruhe! How is that? At that time, very few families in Russia could afford this. One cannot help but get the impression that in 1891. any "poor Jewish family" was much richer than any middle-income Russian family belay feel
      1. +4
        12 October 2023 07: 28
        in 1893, he addressed the Police Department with a letter in which he offered his services to the Okhrana as a paid informant.

        I'll correct it a little. Not in 1893, but in 1892. . In 1892, a young engineering student wrote anonymously to Moscow, introducing himself as “your humble servant, ready to serve,” about his desire to inform the police about socialist circles among Russian students - for a fee. The anonymous police quickly “ran through the database” and in a response letter they sarcastically wrote to him: “I think that I will not be mistaken in calling you, Mr. Azef, by your name, and I ask you to notify me if I should write to you at your address.” So he became a police agent. This date is given by his whistleblowers - both Leonid Petrovich Menshchikov and Vladimir Lvovich Burtsev.
        photo. V.L.Burtsev
        1. 0
          12 October 2023 17: 45
          "Quickly hit the database" probably at the police department, it was not in vain that they ate their bread and knew what to expect from whom
      2. +3
        12 October 2023 09: 01
        in the large family of a poor Jewish tailor.
        "The great Russian artist Levitan was born into a poor Jewish family..."
      3. 0
        12 October 2023 17: 39
        I didn’t pay attention to this. Well done, you spotted it.
        Well, I have doubts that this was possible with every Jewish family.
        They were probably equal, but some are lucky
      4. +1
        12 October 2023 19: 25
        Quote: Richard
        Nevertheless, he manages to graduate from a real school in Rostov-on-Don!

        What's the problem?
        Real gymnasiums, unlike classical ones, quote - “were accessible to children of all conditions and religions.” Delyanov's circular did not apply to them.
        Quote: Richard
        One cannot help but get the impression that in 1891. any "poor Jewish family" was much richer than any middle-income Russian family

        Rather, the Jews had an understanding of the need for education. Otherwise there is no way to get through at all. request
    3. +2
      12 October 2023 19: 16
      Quote: Luminman
      And further. How could a Jewish family, having passed the residency requirement, move from a Belarusian town to a large Russian city?

      Actually, in those days Rostov-on-Don was a district city in the Ekaterinoslav province. And this province was quite included in the “Pale of Settlement”
      1. 0
        12 October 2023 23: 40
        Since 1887, the city entered the Don Army Region.
        1. 0
          13 October 2023 13: 21
          Quote: Sergej1972
          Since 1887, the city entered the Don Army Region.

          Yes, under Baikov. But all categories of the population living in the city and its environs retained their privileges and occupations.
    4. ANB
      +2
      12 October 2023 22: 47
      . And further. How could a Jewish family, having passed the residency requirement, move from a Belarusian town to a large Russian city?

      You are baptized and you are no longer a Jew. It's simple.
    5. +2
      12 October 2023 23: 35
      The Pale of Settlement did not apply to persons who had received higher education, as well as to merchants of the first guild. There were other categories as well.
    6. +2
      13 October 2023 11: 44
      He pursued his own personal interests and may have been a British agent. After all, the British invested a lot of money in “Socialist Revolutionaryism.”
  2. +3
    12 October 2023 04: 56
    The emblem of the Social Revolutionaries in 1917
    Looks suspiciously like a brand of gingerbread smile .
    1. +5
      12 October 2023 05: 25
      Quote: Bolt Cutter
      Looks suspiciously like a brand of gingerbread

      More like the talking sun from Soviet children's cartoons
    2. +1
      12 October 2023 17: 54
      I, purely aesthetically, like the emblem of the Socialist Republic. The communists, the star is also a romantic emblem, I immediately imagine a guiding star
      1. +3
        12 October 2023 18: 21
        Quote from lisikat2
        For communists, the star is also a romantic emblem, I immediately imagine a guiding star

        The guiding star led the Magi to the new king of the Jews, who would be the Savior of the world.
        For the communists, everything was not so simple with the star, or rather, it was very difficult to interpret this five-pointed symbol, Trotsky tried.
  3. +1
    12 October 2023 05: 43
    The KGB informant was also People's Artist of the USSR Donatas Banionis, who in the 90s repeatedly claimed that he did not love the USSR and “received nothing from the Soviet government”

    I would still be careful about making such categorical statements, especially in the media, which includes this site.
    The fact that People's Artist of the USSR Donatas Banionis may have been a secret KGB informant and, on instructions from the security officers, worked with the Lithuanian emigration, became known after the identification and publication of the names of former KGB agents in Lithuania by the Center for the Study of Genocide and Resistance of Lithuanian Residents. The center has identified 1700 people, including Banionis, with a question mark (?) on this list. Those. - Even the Lithuanian state structure itself does not affirm, but only assumes. But many Lithuanian residents are very skeptical about this message from this center. Firstly - Banionis was a deputy of the Supreme Council of Lithuania since 1974 - the KGB was prohibited from interfering with such structures. Secondly, in the archives there is no mandatory handwritten obligation to work for the committee. There are no reports themselves. There is only a certificate from the Panevezys city department of the KGB: that a certain agent “Bronius”, while in the USA, “established contacts with some Lithuanian emigrants who interested us and provided their characteristics.” The center has not yet established who this “Bronius” is. The fact that he was in the USA at the same time as Banionis does not mean anything. And a priori cannot be significant evidence. And thirdly, and most importantly, out of 1700 KGB agents identified by the center, 579 people filed against this center in the European Court of Human Rights and after numerous trials, the Supreme Court of Lithuania established their non-involvement. What has greatly damaged the image of this center
    1. +3
      12 October 2023 07: 01
      Quote: Richard
      in the archives there is no mandatory handwritten obligation to work for the committee

      Such a document was not at all necessary; in most cases they worked according to the so-called. "gentleman's agreement", i.e. Banionis did something for the KGB, and the KGB officers, in turn, helped him with something, for example, to get a leading role or to go abroad
      1. +1
        12 October 2023 08: 00
        Such a document was not at all necessary; in most cases they worked according to the so-called. "gentleman's agreement"

        Well, what kind of “gentleman’s agreements” are there for the devil? The KGB had an iron grip - you couldn’t escape. They didn't play in kindergarten. Everything had to be strictly recorded - especially such important documents in order to control their informants. In order not to write such nonsense about gentlemen's agreements in the future," I recommend that you read the Order of the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR No. 00140 "On the implementation of the Regulations on the intelligence apparatus and proxies of the State Security Bodies of the USSR." The declassified document is also posted on the website of the Latvian National Archives (Latvijas Nacionālais arhīvs), and on the website of the Lithuanian Special Archives (Lietuvos ypatingasis archyvas)
        1. +2
          12 October 2023 08: 26
          And the fact that committee members helped their informants with career growth is a fact. There is a mutual interest here for the informant - advancement on the professional and career ladder, for the Committee - a source for more information. I completely agree with you here.
          1. +2
            12 October 2023 09: 47
            Quote: Richard
            There is a mutual interest here for the informant - advancement up the professional and career ladder, for the Committee - a source for more information

            There is a wonderful book called - Yes, I worked there. These are the memoirs of one employee of the 5th Directorate of the KGB, who was in charge of education and literature. On their birthday, agents could be given a small gift, for example, a watch or even a bouquet of flowers. On New Year's Eve, take him to a restaurant. There was no payment. Receipts, too, in my opinion. Was, as you say, mutual interest. And for a particularly obstinate person, they could even ruin their career... Greetings!

            P.S. It is clear that these are all memoirs, but you can read between the lines and draw conclusions...
        2. +3
          12 October 2023 08: 55
          Quote: Richard
          I recommend that you read the Order of the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR No. 00140

          Where does it say that the informant must certainly sign?

          Quote: Richard
          It was necessary to strictly record everything - especially such important documents in order to control their informants

          The files on the informants were in the archives and they were controlled, but receipts for cooperation are unlikely
          1. -1
            12 October 2023 10: 57
            The files on the informants were in the archives

            In the archives!!!! smile Why not right away in the lobby on the bulletin board? lol
            laughing Thank you, Michel, I haven’t laughed so much in a long time. You lifted the spirits not only of me, but I strongly suspect of all former and current law enforcement officers reading this site. Receipts and reports of sexots are documents of special secrecy - they are stored not in archives, but directly with the operational employees, whose agents these sexots are. The head of the operative does not know who his secret agent is, much less an employee of the departmental archive. Yes This has always been and will be the case - both in the Tsarist secret police, and in the NKVD, and in the KGB, and in the FSB, and in the Ministry of Internal Affairs and in other structures. And not only in the Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR and today’s Russia, but also in all other countries of the world Yes
            Here's a subscription from the Internet:

            Where does it say that the informant must certainly sign?

            Have you read the document carefully? Somehow I seriously doubted this Yes
            ... the agent’s written obligation is written in his own hand in a free form, in which he promises to cooperate in good faith with the authorities, to keep his connection with them secret, and not to disclose information that has become known to him as a result of secret cooperation. An operational worker takes a subscription from the agent. A subscription is not a legal document, but it imposes great moral responsibility on the agent and encourages him to conscientiously fulfill his obligations.... The question of the advisability of taking a subscription from an agent in each specific case is decided taking into account the basis of recruitment and the individual characteristics of the recruited person. For persons with high social status and persons recruited as residents and keepers of secret communication points, a receipt is taken in all cases....

            I don’t think that the Regulations “on the intelligence apparatus” of different structures and different countries are very different from each other. All the best hi
        3. +1
          12 October 2023 09: 07
          Quote: Richard
          The KGB had an iron grip - you couldn’t escape. They didn't play in kindergarten. Everything had to be strictly recorded - especially such important documents in order to control their informants. In order not to write such nonsense about gentlemen's agreements in the future," I recommend that you read the Order of the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR No. 00140 "On the implementation of the Regulations on the intelligence apparatus and proxies of the State Security Bodies of the USSR." The declassified document is also posted on the website of the Latvian National Archives (Latvijas Nacionālais arhīvs), and on the website of the Lithuanian Special Archives (Lietuvos ypatingasis archyvas)

          Well, as it turns out, KGB archives from the Baltic states in advance, until August 1991 there were taken out in the Russian Federation, as officials of those republics have repeatedly stated
          Vice-Chancellor of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Erkki Koort told Delfi that the search for traces of the ESSR KGB archives taken away in the early 90s should undoubtedly continue
          “Based on the existing chronology, important documents were taken out before the restoration of Estonia’s independence.
          And here in Latvia, they suddenly publish secret order KGB, and for some reason in 1983? What about previous years? In this regard, such a selective release of a list of people who collaborated with the KGB would be a kind of game of roulette: some would be lucky, others not. And the most interesting thing is who determines what should be published? In general, from time to time the FSB deliberately instigates the leak of information from its archives in the interests of certain political groups and parties. No one “digs” into the special storage facility of the country’s main intelligence service, and it is impossible to get into it even with a “high” recommendation. Only employees of the Central Archive (CA) of the FSB have access there. Neither representatives of other government bodies, nor even officers of the operational units of counterintelligence itself have the right to enter the archive premises. The procedure is the same for everyone: you can obtain archival information only through a written request. Naturally, requests and instructions from government agencies have priority. Therefore, to statements about allegedly found somewhere documents should be treated with skepticism.
          1. 0
            12 October 2023 10: 03
            Therefore, statements about documents allegedly found somewhere should be treated with skepticism.

            The majority of Lithuanian residents view the work of this odious “Center for the Study of Genocide and Resistance of Lithuanian Residents to Soviet Occupation” with similar skepticism. A number of international experts and lawyers directly call the data published by the center falsified.
      2. 0
        12 October 2023 14: 52
        Such a document was not at all necessary; in most cases they worked according to the so-called. "gentleman's agreement"

        Were you a KGB employee or did you work under a “gentleman’s agreement”? If not, then your comment is naked lies with which various fringes have turned the modern information space into a dung heap.
        1. -2
          12 October 2023 15: 26
          Oh, some sovkodocher with a minus has already arrived. These “onanists from history” will never understand that attempts to live in the past end tragically.
  4. +1
    12 October 2023 06: 38
    The Bolsheviks might not have assembled the Constituent Assembly at all. And do you know why? Because At the II All-Russian Congress of Soviets on October 25, 1917, the Decree on Power was adopted, which proclaimed the widespread transfer of power to the Councils of Workers', Soldiers' and Peasants' Deputies. Executive power was transferred to the Council of People's Commissars. And no Constituent Assemblies were envisaged.
  5. 0
    12 October 2023 07: 39
    "The affectionate calf of two queens sucks..."
    So is Azef.
    He probably lacked the adrenaline and power of a sort of “Gray Cardinal”!
  6. +4
    12 October 2023 08: 10
    The same fate awaited Nestor Makhno in Paris, Leon Trotsky in Mexico and Bonaparte's rival Victor Moreau in the USA.
    Well, Leon Trotsky should not be mentioned on this list. Unlike all the others, he had a powerful party, the fight against which cost us a lot of blood.
    1. VLR
      +2
      12 October 2023 08: 34
      Trotsky, of course, had supporters, but abroad he was mainly engaged in literary activities. He did not have a party ready for real revolutionary activity; he did not even try to organize any kind of anti-government action in Mexico, Germany, or anywhere else. He was dangerous only because of his big name and past merits, which is why people listened to him. When he was killed, little changed, the people who were attracted to Trotsky did not go away, there were no more or less of them. That is, people of a certain character objectively existed and, probably, would have managed without Trotsky. If he had died of pneumonia or something else before emigrating, they would have chosen another person as their “standard bearer.” It was not Trotsky who agitated them, but they chose him and “appointed” him as their leader.
      1. VLR
        +2
        12 October 2023 08: 49
        But, without Trotsky, these people probably united not into one, but into several competing groups
        1. -1
          12 October 2023 10: 08
          these people united not in one, but in several competing groups
          Which ones, for example? How would Moro compete with Makhno? Makhno, by the way, wasn’t even a theorist of anarchism. Can you name at least one of his works on the theory of anarchism? But Moro, that’s a completely different story.
          1. VLR
            +1
            12 October 2023 10: 17
            These are simply examples of how, falling out of the environment that raised them, passionate people “get lost” and cannot fully realize their abilities. Another example is Gogol, who did not write anything worthwhile in Italy. Tsvetaeva and A.N. Tolstoy were also in exile in a severe creative crisis and were eager to go home, subconsciously feeling that there they would come out of this state. In exile, Brodsky wrote beautiful, but absolutely “cold” poems that did not touch the soul.
            1. -1
              12 October 2023 12: 37
              Passionate people “get lost” and cannot fully realize their abilities.
              On these three, a completely unsuccessful example with Tolstoy too... In emigration, Tolstoy wrote the novel “Aelita”, the stories “Nikita’s Childhood”, “The Tale of Troubled Times”, “The Murder of Antoine Rivo” and “The Manuscript Found Under the Bed”. Turgenev , lived abroad and created his works there. But he wrote for the Russian reader and his works were not particularly published abroad, but were published in Russia mainly, relatively speaking, his “Mu-mu” was not interesting in France, and is not interesting even now .A poet in Russia, more than a poet, now this is not the case, alas. Bakunin, felt great while abroad, realized his abilities as a revolutionary. Makhno could not, did not know languages ​​and was simply an uneducated person (he knew how to write, read, knowledge was not enough). Trotsky, after emigrating from the USSR, simply fought with Stalin, this was his fixed idea. Moreau, a military leader who was no longer needed by his homeland. He was not a particularly ardent revolutionary.
              Gogol, who did not write anything worthwhile in Italy.
              Yeah, Overcoat, Dead Souls. Overcoat, of course, is apparently nonsense in your opinion, like Dead Souls... nothing worthwhile. laughing Sorry, you are pulling a lot of things out of your ears.
              1. VLR
                +1
                13 October 2023 03: 29
                “Dead Souls,” by the way, were widely criticized in Russia due to the far-fetched and outright stilted nature of the characters, who are not people, as Gogol used to do, but walking cartoons and caricatures. In Russia, Gogol’s characters were three-dimensional, alive, but in Italy they became two-dimensional and flat. He tried to “revive” them - the skill remained. But it was not people who came out, but some people who had not met, but life-long cadavers, like Plyushkin. Even Gogol’s admirers directly said that in Italy he became detached from Russian reality, stopped understanding Russia, and was writing nonsense. And Gogol himself realized this; he ended up burning the second volume, which was even worse and weaker than the first.
                1. VLR
                  +2
                  13 October 2023 03: 50
                  Now “Dead Souls” is “readable” precisely because modern people actually do not know the real Russia of the 19th century and take everything seriously. And contemporaries, including Gogol’s fans, were terribly disappointed with this “poem”, because Gogol suddenly wrote “cranberries” about Russia - like a foreigner who accidentally visited. But everyone unconditionally accepted the even more satirical “The Inspector General,” because they saw in it precisely Russia and Russians. people, not “Muscovites” and “Russia”.
      2. +3
        12 October 2023 13: 12
        he didn’t even try to organize some kind of anti-government action, even in Mexico, even in Germany, or anywhere else
        Trotsky was given a residence permit in different countries, provided that he would not conduct anti-government activities against the governments of these countries.
      3. +2
        12 October 2023 18: 26
        Trotsky, of course, had supporters, but abroad he was mainly engaged in literary activities.
        And in Spain (1936-1939) were the Trotskyists of their own accord, or did they still bring the “World Revolution” closer according to the behests of the “retired” “writer”?
        1. VLR
          +2
          13 October 2023 03: 22
          They did not apply to Trotsky for a “commander certificate.” Like the Russian anarchists, who verbally honored Kropotkin, but acted as their broad nature told them, such people are always and everywhere. Trotsky was interesting and scary because of his past. In Mexico, he was already a “wedding general” - he did not have the opportunity to plan anything and give orders. And he has a future
          there was none outside Russia.
    2. +2
      12 October 2023 09: 02
      he had a powerful party
      The party, let’s say he didn’t have enough supporters in the party. There were political parties of the Trotskyist direction, there was a merger of these parties by the Fourth International. And the list is clumsy Makhno, Moreau, Trotsky, what is common? There are overlapping points, but nothing more.
  7. +2
    12 October 2023 08: 17
    The most curious thing is that the Socialist Revolutionary Party was created with the help of the Police Department and Security Branches, there was a kind of resurrection of the defeated “Narodnaya Volya” and the method of political provocation became a tool.
    There was no shortage of secret agents in the Security Branches; already in those days, five types of revolutionaries were identified, from which agents were recruited:
    - the first type, fanatics (as a rule, subsequently died)
    - the second type, lovers of revolutionary fashion who strive to be modern (useless ballast)
    - third type, people are depressed, disillusioned with life (smoothly flow into the first type)
    - fourth type, marginals
    - fifth type, they crave power and money.
    1. +3
      12 October 2023 16: 55
      An interesting point is that Azef, who returned from Karlsruhe, is not afraid of persecution for an unpaid debt to the “Mariupol merchant”.
      Was there a merchant? It is quite possible that Azef was sent “to study” precisely from the Rostov security department, having previously recruited him on the basis of his participation in a circle. And already in Europe, Azef decided to earn extra money by offering his services to the capital’s secret police. This scenario immediately explains how he was identified - by the circle of people in which he offered his services as an informant. They raised documents in Moscow - “is there anyone we have there?
      - Eat ! And he asks for more."
      So we decided to bring such an initiative person home and use him more actively. The recommendation of the party founder himself, an unknown “fresh” revolutionary, also says a lot.
      Azef could not prove himself to him, because he had not been in Russia before. So it really looks like the SR party was originally a project of the secret police.
  8. +3
    12 October 2023 08: 56
    The Socialist Revolutionaries, who can safely be called the direct heirs of the Narodnaya Volya members, considered the main driving force of the revolution to be numerous peasants - and not workers, like the Social Democrats
    The Social Democrats were in favor of an alliance of workers with the peasantry, and the Socialist Revolutionaries were in favor of an alliance of peasants with workers. Only they looked at the land question differently. The Social Democrats were in favor of the nationalization of the land, the Socialist Revolutionaries were in favor of a “black redistribution”, in simple terms: all the land select and divide everything according to the number of eaters. This installation was both simple and understandable to the peasants. Therefore, the Socialist Revolutionary Party was popular among the peasantry, especially in the black earth regions. And during the peasant uprisings, during the first Russian revolution of 1905-1907, leading and directing The power was the Socialist Revolutionary Party. And Banionis was a KGB agent because he played a Soviet intelligence officer in The Velvet Season? laughing Banionis remained a man, and not like “Mimino”. Banionis is not seen in open anti-Soviet or Russophobic statements. And what does he have to do with Azef? Did he betray someone? Betrayed him?
  9. +4
    12 October 2023 11: 40
    the role of Ladeinikov in "Dead Season" was "doomed" to its performer the title of People's Artist of the USSR. So whether Kuravlev, Svetin or Banionis played her, such roles were a ticket to the galaxy of People's Artists of the USSR. Similar roles, intelligence officers of the highest standard, were played by Kadochnikov, L. Noreika, Tikhonov - People's Artists of the USSR. And Banionis was awarded the title of People's Artist of the USSR not after the release of "Dead Season", but only a few years after the release of "Seventeen Moments of Spring". Perhaps they were waiting for the go-ahead from Andropov.
    I saw Banionis's last interview on Central Television, shortly before his death. Not even a hint of gratitude to the Soviet Union and the great Soviet culture for what they gave to Banionis. I dare to suggest that before his death he no longer acted in interviews, but was real, as he really is... You can spit on the title of People's Artist of the USSR in different ways. It can be like Banionis, it can be like Gorbachev, who awarded one of the last titles of People's Artist of the USSR to the tavern singer Pugacheva. Well, as Pugacheva now spits on the USSR and this Title and Russia, it’s not for me to explain to you, you know it yourself, you see and hear.
    1. +1
      12 October 2023 13: 35
      I saw Banionis's last interview on Central Television
      Did he use anti-Soviet and Russophobic rhetoric in this interview?
      the role of Ladeinikov in "Dead Season" was "doomed" to its performer the title of People's Artist of the USSR. So play it, either Kuravlev or Svetin
      But Kuravlev and Svetin were not invited to this role. And V. Tikhonov was immediately approved. But the director looked differently and nevertheless, they wanted to replace Banionis. One of the leaders of the Lenfilm artistic council, Grigory Kozintsev, and Kulish’s teacher, Mikhail Romm, also insisted on this. But that’s not the point. Banionis was not a KGB agent, this is my comment. smile
  10. +3
    12 October 2023 12: 04
    All these evil spirits, through the hands of uneducated peasants and workers, carried out their ideological desires, striving for power, and conducted a monstrous, bloody experiment on Russia. And it’s good that later, in large numbers, the top leaders of these parties themselves were put up against the wall, accused of espionage, counter-revolution, and other charges. For that fought for it and ran.
    1. 0
      12 October 2023 12: 16
      Quote: RusGr
      All these evil spirits, with the hands of uneducated peasants and workers, carried out their ideological desires, striving for power, and conducted a monstrous, bloody experiment on Russia

      What you have, good sir, is not the history of the country of Russia, but a retelling of K. Chukovsky’s fairy tale “The Cockroach” ..... what other “experiment” could there be if in the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks positions were elected and the rights of elected Soviets were enormous? Without mooing and sniffling, you yourself can clearly answer why the hell and who needed the “experiment”? You are repeating Hitler’s ideas about an inferior people who are unable to create a normal state for themselves.

      The answer is simple; The state law is not enough for you; you also need a “good gentleman” who will make this law enforced. Why then do you need a law at all? Why do you need a republican state? Live like the old fashioned way, as a serf with a landowner....
      1. 0
        12 October 2023 12: 23
        So who lies in the Mausoleum? Chief "experimenter". You should think and study who was not satisfied with the February Revolution. He was not satisfied with the overthrow of the tsar, bringing about a revolution to establish the dictatorship of the party. Although the main task of the collapse of the Empire and loss in the First World War, this German spy completed it - Excellent!
      2. +3
        12 October 2023 12: 28
        Quote: ivan2022
        You are repeating Hitler’s ideas about inferior people who are unable to create a normal state for themselves

        No, buddy. It’s you who are constantly harping on this bullshit here. Moreover, it is precisely in the context of the Russian people... which, admittedly, is starting to become somewhat annoying Yes
  11. +4
    12 October 2023 14: 39
    got a job as an engineer at one of the Moscow factories

    Generally speaking, it was arranged. At Ericsson, in the commercial department. Where, by the way, he quite quickly, with the help of advertising, managed to increase sales volumes.
  12. +1
    12 October 2023 15: 38
    Colleagues, Valery, good day to everyone.
    Valery, I read about Azef and could not formulate my attitude towards him: something unprincipled and slippery, with nothing attractive.
    Cunning, even talented
  13. +3
    12 October 2023 17: 05
    Frettaskyrandi, dear, please do not provoke “Richard.” Law of the Russian Federation of July 21.07.1993, 5485 N 1-04.08.2023 (as amended on August XNUMX, XNUMX) “On State Secrets”:
    Article 5. List of information constituting a state secret “State secrets are:
    4) information in the field of intelligence, counterintelligence and operational-search activities, as well as in the field of countering terrorism and in the field of ensuring the safety of persons in respect of whom a decision has been made to apply state protection measures:
    about forces, means, sources, methods, plans and results of intelligence, counterintelligence, operational-search activities and counter-terrorism activities, as well as data on the financing of these activities, if these data disclose the listed information;
    about persons collaborating or collaborating on a confidential basis with bodies carrying out intelligence, counterintelligence and operational investigative activities;"
  14. +1
    12 October 2023 17: 27
    Luminman (luminman), dear, if you have time and desire, please read Articles 17 and 18 of the Federal Law of August 12.08.1995, 144 N 29.12.2022-FZ (as amended on December XNUMX, XNUMX) “On operational investigative activities.”
    And the no longer valid Law of the Russian Federation of June 24.06.1993, 5238 N 1-31.12.2002 (as amended on December 11, XNUMX) “On federal tax police bodies” Article XNUMX. Rights of federal tax police bodies.
    To carry out the tasks assigned to them, the federal tax police authorities are given the right to:
    1) carry out, in accordance with the law, operational investigative measures in order to identify, prevent and suppress facts of concealment of income from taxation and tax evasion, the investigation and preliminary investigation of which are assigned by law to the jurisdiction of the federal tax police authorities, as well as ensuring one’s own security;
    19) involve citizens, with their consent, in cooperation to identify facts, forms and methods of committing crimes and violations in the field of tax legislation;
    20) pay the person who provided information about a tax crime or violation a reward in the amount of up to 10 percent of the hidden amounts of taxes, fees and other obligatory payments received to the relevant budget."
    It is clear that capitalism is about money. Money worked great for some people, very significant sums were paid to people from the budget...
    It seems that an employee of the 5th Directorate of the KGB of the USSR in his memoirs “Yes, I worked there.” did not say something.
  15. +1
    12 October 2023 17: 59
    “Refused to confirm,” it turns out Rotenberg acted on his own initiative, and the batch of seeds was stolen?
  16. 0
    13 October 2023 04: 50
    After the collapse of the USSR, many former KGB agents made very successful careers in the new Russophobic states. For example, the President of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaite and the Prime Minister of the same country Kazimir Prunskienė, as well as the former Prime Minister of Latvia Ivars Godmanis, are accused of working for the KGB.

    Why are there “new Russophobic states” here?
    1. 0
      13 October 2023 09: 07
      Maybe then because the states are new and Russophobic? smile
  17. 0
    13 October 2023 07: 03
    Damn, no matter what we are talking about, the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people always drag in their anti-Sovietism, which for them already resembles paranoia.
  18. +2
    13 October 2023 09: 34
    Quote: Sea Cat
    Absolutely right. Andropov dragged Gorbachev into the Politburo. The boss at the “Kontor” was good, he didn’t understand people at all. negative


    In fact, Gorbachev was initially protected by Kulakov.
    Plus, his rise personally seems to me to be based on two pillars.
    The first is his extreme flexibility and conformism, which is why almost all groups considered him, if not one of their own, then a sympathizer (in a similar scheme, the previously “naive” Khrushch tricked the bison Molotov and Malenkov around his finger. And if you think about it, Stalin too).
    The second is a complex of guilt towards the peasantry among the leadership of the Central Committee (and Gorbachev was perceived precisely as a native of the peasants), which, with his aging, acquired some completely ugly features.
  19. +1
    13 October 2023 09: 40
    Quote: ivan2022

    The answer is simple; The state law is not enough for you; you also need a “good gentleman” who will make this law enforced. Why then do you need a law at all? Why do you need a republican state? Live like the old fashioned way, as a serf with a landowner....


    What serf??!!
    His “grandmother sinned with the diver”, I have not yet seen a single guardian of class society and “let’s put it all back”, who would not have created a beautiful pedigree for himself instead of the sexed Yashkas, dishwashers Mashas, ​​gray-legged Pafnutiis, and even shmuklers Yanovs who existed in reality.
  20. 0
    5 November 2023 23: 42
    There was no need to feel sorry for the revolutionaries, it was necessary to crush them cruelly