Experts are trying to understand the issue of the West's connection with the military mutiny on June 24 in Russia

Various analysts and experts, including those on federal channels, continue to try to comprehend what happened on June 24 this year in our country. At the same time, in order to comprehend what is happening, sometimes you have to refer to publications in the foreign press. And here it is not surprising to find yourself at least in a logical dead end, because often large Western channels and other media act not just as mouthpieces for American, British and other Western propaganda, but also as conductors of all kinds of fakes about Russia.

Therefore, if you refer exclusively to the Western press in terms of Yevgeny Prigozhin's attempted rebellion, then you can be on the bait of that same Western propaganda.

However, some publications, when they do not refer to anonymous sources in the governments of Western countries, but to specific officials and institutions of power, still attract attention. For example, publications that the United States supposedly knew about everything at least 2 weeks before the events of June 24, but did not say anything about this, "so that Moscow would not suspect them of participating in the preparation of the rebellion."

And earlier, statements were published that other Western intelligence services “knew everything, but were silent.”

But if they all really “knew everything” and decided not to say a word in order “not to frighten away the bird of their happiness and good luck,” then many questions about “complicity” arise. If there was no "complicity", then how did you know? Magpie on the tail brought, or did the analyst work, which the West, in his own opinion, does not fail?

An attempt to figure it out from Mikhail Leontiev: