Formation of the proletariat of Donbass in the second half of the XNUMXth century

20
Formation of the proletariat of Donbass in the second half of the XNUMXth century

After the abolition of serfdom, the workers of the landlord enterprises began to return to agriculture en masse. This further aggravated the crisis state of enterprises and forced the landowners to switch to a civilian form of labor.

On March 8, 1861, Alexander II approved the "Regulations on the mining population of state-owned mining plants", according to which workers were forever exempted from compulsory service at factories. This exemption also applied to their offspring. In order to prevent a mass outflow of workers to the countryside, they were given small household plots of land (up to 1 tithe). So the government intended to keep workers in the factories.

Growth in the number of workers


The coal industry of Donbass in the first post-reform years, as before the reform, was served mainly by seasonal workers. As of 1866, only 348 jobs were employed in the small landlord and peasant mines of the western Donbass, while up to 3 people worked annually in the mines of the Grushevsky district, who came mainly from the Kursk, Tula and Oryol provinces and worked only in the autumn winter period. In the spring and summer, many mines stopped their work due to a shortage of workers.



Thus, by the beginning of the 1870s, there was a limited number of skilled workers in the Donbass - about 2 people.

In the 1870s, after the emergence of the Yuzovsky and Sulinsky metallurgical plants, the number of workers increased several times and by 1880 was already about 16 people.

The rapid development of industry in the Donbass in the 1880s-1890s further contributed to attracting workers to the industry. Attracting new workers to the Donbass ran into a number of obstacles. This is the low population of the region in this period, and the predominantly agricultural nature of the local population, and the lack of locally trained personnel, and the proximity to areas of capitalist agriculture.

Foreigners also appear among the workers of Donbass. So, in 1864, 6 workers from Silesia were discharged to the Petrovsky plant under construction, and in 1869 John Hughes brought 70 skilled workers with him from England. However, the total number of foreign skilled workers was small, they were highly paid and stood out sharply from the general mass of workers.


Coke cooling at the Yuzovsky plant

The worsening situation of the peasants contributed to the increase in the number of workers in the Donbass. The ruined peasants of many provinces, in order to somehow survive, went to the factories and mines of Donbass, as a result of which the industry of the region was replenished with new workers, and the peasants received a livelihood.

Use of child labor


However, hard work in industrial enterprises had its negative sides. So, as a result of exhausting work, workers quickly lost their health, it took only 15 years for an old man endowed with many diseases to emerge from a healthy guy. This has become one of the reasons for the increase in the use of child and adolescent labor. For meager wages, children and teenagers who came to the enterprises performed auxiliary work.

Children, like adults, were brought to the mines and factories of Donbass by extreme need. When applying for a business, they overestimated their age, and the owners of enterprises benefited from their work, since children were paid much less than adults. L. A. Lieberman, who worked in the Donbass for many years, wrote that in the mines of the region you can see whole crowds of boys:

“With pale, mutilated faces, smeared with soot and soot, with black hands, utterly oily, they quickly move through a huge building under the vigilant eye of a foreman. It is difficult for most of them to give even 13 years, quite often children of eleven years old come across. But if you ask anyone how old he is, he will answer to your amazement: "fifteen." Thus, the law on the age of working children was fulfilled. It was no less strictly observed in relation to the length of the working day and night work.

Since children are much worse adapted to difficult working conditions than adults, the mortality rate among them was also higher.

In metallurgical plants, children were used mainly for cleaning and lubricating the boilers of steam engines. Minors accounted for up to a quarter of all workers at the enterprises of the Belgian society of Donetsk glass factories.

Over time, the number of children among the workers of Donbass only increased. Thus, during the pre-revolutionary twenty years (1897-1917), the number of children among workers increased by 3,2 times, the number of women by 4,5 times.

National composition


As for the national composition of the workers of Donbass in this period, it directly depended on the place of their origin. The vast majority of workers were from the central provinces of the country and from the Left-bank Ukraine. Therefore, the formation of the working class of Donbass took place at the expense of Russians and Ukrainians.

A more accurate picture of the national composition of the workers can be seen from the materials of the All-Russian population census of 1897. According to these data, in the industry of Donbass, Russians accounted for 74%, Ukrainians - 22,3%. Belarusians, Tatars, Poles, Moldavians, Jews were much less represented. There were also small numbers of foreign workers at the metallurgical plants, mainly British (at the Yuz plant), Belgians, Germans, and French.


Sheet-rolling shop of the Yuzovsky Metallurgical Plant

Personnel


One of the most important indicators was also the high rate of formation of the cadre of workers. At the end of the XNUMXth century, hereditary workers of the Lugansk factory already existed. After its closure, workers move to other enterprises in the region and work there as skilled workers. It was Lugansk skilled workers who became the main part of the Yuzovsky and Sulinsky factories.


Blast furnace gasman

An insignificant part were skilled workers from the central provinces of the country, as well as from the Urals. There were also metalworkers from Poland. Nevertheless, the bulk of the working masses were yesterday's peasants, who left the village en masse. Some of them, having earned money, returned back, while others settled in new places forever. Zemstvo officials wrote about this:

“They all left home out of necessity, because there was nothing for them to do there. They are at home - extra hands and extra mouths. They abandoned their homeland for an indefinite period, perhaps forever. Communication with their homeland in most cases is limited to their memories of her, and the expulsion, from time to time, money to the house to pay taxes. After serving the pecuniary duty, they forget about the house, about the motherland. For him, here is a second homeland, which gives him the opportunity to earn a piece of bread ... "

As you can see, in the metallurgical industry, personnel was formed relatively quickly.

Things were much more complicated in the coal industry. Due to difficult working conditions, which led to high mortality, for a long time the Donbass mines did not have permanent personnel. Workers got jobs in the mines only for a while (as a rule, for winter-spring), after which they returned to their villages.

A significant obstacle to the formation of the cadre of miners was the desire of local capitalists to get the maximum benefit at any cost. Many of them deliberately hired unskilled workers, since their labor was much cheaper. They also saved on the mechanization of mines.

All this was the main reason that until the beginning of the 70th century, up to XNUMX% of miners were unskilled and seasonal workers. And only at the beginning of the XNUMXth century, when the flow of skilled workers from Moscow, St. Petersburg and other central cities increased, a permanent staff began to form among the miners of Donbass.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    7 July 2023 06: 04
    Since children are much worse adapted to difficult working conditions than adults, the mortality rate among them was also higher.
    This is real hell...
    For this alone, the tsars and the nobility are indebted to Russia. Only V.I. Ulyanov-Lenin and his associates partly paid off ...
    1. +3
      7 July 2023 06: 54
      Good morning everyone. I don’t know how it is in the south, but in the Stone Belt women were supposed to be two times less than men.
      For example, on the alloy, many feeders hired "women" at the rate of 3 to 2 men. The benefit for navigation could run up to 8 rubles.
      In the mining factories of the Urals, women worked little. It was more profitable to engage in vegetable gardens and cattle. However, the family of a serf worker received food allowances from the factory over their heads. Labor service or a lesson was carried only by the heads of houses. Since 1848, 250 days, taking into account the suffering and church holidays. Ascribed had a burden half as long as 125 days. However, behind the zhigars, contracts were concluded in boxes (a measure, about a sazhen long, half a sazhen wide and high). A lesson in a pood of ore relied on the soul of a miner per day. True, in order to gain it, it was necessary to chop and raise 20-25 pounds of rock.
      Even the cattle, which was used for ramming dams, had a duty. However, serf workers had access to the plant's funds.
      For example, horses for the removal of hay and firewood were ordered from the factory management.
      1. +3
        7 July 2023 08: 06
        and on the Stone Belt, women were supposed to be two times less than men.
        For example, on the alloy, many feeders hired "women" at the rate of 3 to 2 men.

        Buddy, the example shown shows a proportion of 1/1,5, not the declared 1/2. Sorry for the boredom.
        1. +2
          7 July 2023 10: 03
          1/1,15 is labor and 1/2 is salary. We believe:
          Good morning everyone. I don’t know how it is in the south, but in the Stone Belt women were supposed to be two times less than men.
          For example, on the alloy, many feeders hired "women" at the rate of 3 to 2 men. The benefit for navigation could run up to 8 rubles.

          Total: they hire 1,5 times more and pay 2 times less. We consider the lowest denominator, in this case 4: instead of 4 men, 6 women are hired. In total, instead of 4 men's salary, they pay 3. Benefit - 1 salary for 4 workers / men. Well, if the standard fee for all navigation is 30 rubles, then the savings "up to 8 rubles" come out on the snout.
          1. +3
            7 July 2023 13: 47
            Quote: Not the fighter
            1/1,15 is labor and 1/2 is salary. We believe:
            Good morning everyone. I don’t know how it is in the south, but in the Stone Belt women were supposed to be two times less than men.
            For example, on the alloy, many feeders hired "women" at the rate of 3 to 2 men. The benefit for navigation could run up to 8 rubles.

            Total: they hire 1,5 times more and pay 2 times less. We consider the lowest denominator, in this case 4: instead of 4 men, 6 women are hired. In total, instead of 4 men's salary, they pay 3. Benefit - 1 salary for 4 workers / men. Well, if the standard fee for all navigation is 30 rubles, then the savings "up to 8 rubles" come out on the snout.

            Thanks for clarifying!
            There is a catastrophic lack of time - fathers.
    2. 0
      11 July 2023 09: 09
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Since children are much worse adapted to difficult working conditions than adults, the mortality rate among them was also higher.
      This is real hell...
      For this alone, the tsars and the nobility are indebted to Russia. Only V.I. Ulyanov-Lenin and his associates partly paid off ...

      Khe khe
      In Russia, the law on June 1, 1882 established a ban on the work of children under 12 years old, for children 12-15 years old limited the time of work to 8 hours a day (moreover, no more than 4 hours without a break) and prohibited night work (from 9 pm to 5 pm morning) and Sunday work, and also prohibited the use of child labor in hazardous industries.
  2. +6
    7 July 2023 06: 39
    Work at the mine has always been and remains dangerous. Especially when the state gives safety equipment to private hands. Not only foreign workers worked in the Donbass, but also English companies. No one wrote about child labor in Tsarist Russia. Mamin-Sibiryak has entire works devoted to this. All of Russia was entangled by foreign companies. Some still have a dream to return to that "fertile" time. Gracious for the elect.
    1. 0
      2 January 2024 12: 13
      This was colonialism in its purest form. Foreign imperialists plundered the country
  3. -1
    7 July 2023 07: 04
    Good research. As an illustration to Lenin's book "The Development of Capitalism in Russia" from 1899.

    He then argued that Russia is not a bunch of thieves and drunks, but there is all the rank - - plane trees, as it should be in cap. country.
    Was Ilyich wrong?
    As for the USSR, the forecast that everyone will be plundered and drunk away has come true .... . And what about Russia?
    1. +3
      7 July 2023 08: 53
      Quote: ivan2022
      Good research. As an illustration to Lenin's book "The Development of Capitalism in Russia" from 1899.

      He then argued that Russia is not a bunch of thieves and drunks, but there is all the rank - - plane trees, as it should be in cap. country.
      Was Ilyich wrong?

      What was wrong with Ilyich? Is it because without restraint, at least in the form of trade unions, under capitalism there is super-exploitation?

      Quote: ivan2022
      As for the USSR, the forecast that everyone will be plundered and drunk away has come true ....
      Well, the USSR was not destroyed by theft and drunkenness, so far not all of the legacy of the USSR was plundered and drunk ...


      Quote: ivan2022
      And what about Russia?
      Tsarist Russia did not become at all, like the royal family, but what?
      1. 0
        8 July 2023 07: 07
        Quote: Vladimir_2U



        Quote: ivan2022
        And what about Russia?
        Tsarist Russia did not become at all, like the royal family, but what?

        And then ..... What will you ask this question if the same thing happens to today's Russia .... You don’t need to get ahead of yourself even if you want to.
      2. 0
        8 July 2023 07: 12
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Quote: ivan2022
        Good research. As an illustration to Lenin's book "The Development of Capitalism in Russia" from 1899.

        He then argued that Russia is not a bunch of thieves and drunks, but there is all the rank - - plane trees, as it should be in cap. country.
        Was Ilyich wrong?

        What was wrong with Ilyich? Is it because without restraint, at least in the form of trade unions, under capitalism there is super-exploitation?

        Quote: ivan2022
        As for the USSR, the forecast that everyone will be plundered and drunk away has come true ....
        Well, the USSR was not destroyed by theft and booze, so far not all of the legacy of the USSR was plundered and drunk.

        And what, he was not mistaken, if what he created was destroyed?

        What about trade unions-what kind of nonsense? Trade unions seem to have appeared in the 19th century and not as a state "containment".

        Do you know the slogan "all power to the Soviets"?... . With the full power of the elected body - - the Soviets - no one needs to be restrained. Once it's full...

        Did it ever occur to you that this is strange - for example, "to deter" the driver of a car next to put another driver?? What will happen? And from which oak do you have to fall in order to do the same in government?

        Heh.. Heh.... As for drunkenness... And specifically in the Belovezhskaya Pushcha forest in December 1991, what did three drunken dudes do?

        And if you don’t think too much, but turn to the opinion of a professional, Mr. Delyagin (who is still a state adviser to the Russian Federation):
        "Not a typical state was created - a machine for plundering the country's resources" .....
        1. 0
          8 July 2023 15: 43
          Quote: ivan2022
          what nonsense?

          This is strictly about your comment. Slightly connected rubbish...
    2. +3
      7 July 2023 10: 08
      He then argued that Russia is not a bunch of thieves and drunks, but there is all the rank - - plane trees, as it should be in cap. country.
      Was Ilyich wrong?
      Don't you find yourself contradicting yourself?
      1. 0
        8 July 2023 07: 25
        And you do not find that nonsense breccia? If Lenin created a state with democratic laws, and it fell apart because it was the "dear Russians" who democratically elected traitors to the highest posts first of all?
  4. 0
    7 July 2023 07: 09
    Thanks to the author for the work, good day comrades! hi
  5. +4
    7 July 2023 10: 06
    The author published data, hitherto unknown to anyone, as if the formation of the proletariat in the second half of the XNUMXth century in other regions of the country went somehow differently.
  6. +2
    7 July 2023 13: 26
    Another opus from Sarmatov. The style of this author (hack) is to write a headline from the Internet and under it a few paragraphs, somehow in content suitable for the heading.
    In reality, the process of formation of the mining and mining industry and the industrial proletariat of the south of the Russian Empire was much more complicated and it is rather problematic to cover it in one article. Unfortunately, such hack-work on the site flourishes.
    1. 0
      8 July 2023 07: 46
      Useful popular article....
      And what, on a popular site it is necessary to place a dissertation?
      What exactly is wrong with the author? Where is his misinformation?

      Are you from a competing firm or do you need an article glorifying "Russia we have lost"?
  7. +1
    8 July 2023 08: 29
    The author (Sarmatov) is good for readers in that he publishes some new information.
    Well, I didn’t know about Yuz at all.
    And for VO, the author is good in that we start "running in place" in the comments. We are active. Sometimes we do dogs. But this is all for the benefit of our VO. Many left the VO and slammed the door? )