Operation "Citadel": an attempt by the German army to regain the initiative

54
Operation "Citadel": an attempt by the German army to regain the initiative
German shielded Tanks Pz. Kpfw. III in the Soviet village before the start of Operation Citadel


General situation


The spring thaw in March 1943 put an end to the 9-month-long bitter struggle on the Eastern (Russian) Front. The Russian army blocked and destroyed the best 6th German army in Stalingrad. The Russians seized the strategic initiative and tried to develop success in the north, in the center and especially in the south, trying to encircle and destroy the southern wing of the German army (How the Soviet Headquarters prepared the Caucasian cauldron).



However, the German army had not yet been defeated, retaining its former skill and power, it could deliver strong counterattacks. The Germans fought furiously, skillfully maneuvered, transferred mobile formations from one sector of the front to another, retreated in time, shortening the front line and compacting defensive formations in other sectors. As a result, the Germans were able to create a new strong defense in the south, avoiding a catastrophe that could lead to a sharp deterioration in the situation of the Third Reich. The Germans voluntarily left bridgeheads in the central and northern sectors of the front, forestalling the Red Army, who were trying to cut off these ledges.

The Soviet armies suffered heavy losses, needed rest and replenishment with people and equipment. The German army also suffered serious losses. Muds began, tanks and other heavy weapons sank in the mud. Therefore, both sides decided to temporarily abandon offensive operations, regroup their forces and prepare for the summer campaign of 1943, which was becoming decisive.

The Nazis could no longer conduct an offensive along the entire front, as in the course of the 1941 campaign, or in one strategic direction, as in 1942. This was caused both by the heavy losses of the German army and the growth of the power of the Red Army. The Russian command has become more flexible and experienced. Soviet industry was restructured, increasing the production of high-quality military equipment.


German tank Pz. Kpfw. VI "Tiger" before the start of the operation "Citadel" in the village of Budy

Struggle for strategic initiative


Part of the German generals were inclined towards the idea of ​​the army going on the defensive. If one could not count on a decisive offensive in Russia, then it was necessary to go on the defensive. The benefits were obvious. The German defense took place in the depths of our land, the Russians could not cause significant damage to the Reich itself. In the rear there was enough room for maneuver, where it was favorable, it was possible to conduct a stubborn defense, and in other sectors, if it was advantageous, it was possible to withdraw, regroup forces and counterattack.

The German army itself, especially the formations that fought on the southern wing of the front, overcame the “Stalingrad shock”. Many divisions, including all armored and many infantry divisions, were withdrawn to the rear for rest and replenishment. They trained almost as in peacetime. Even the divisions that were at the front had the opportunity to withdraw to the rear for rest and training of individual units and units. Morale in the Wehrmacht was still high, as was the quality of combat training.

However, Hitler understood that Germany was not ready for a protracted war of attrition. The military-political situation was constantly deteriorating. Anglo-American troops took up North Africa, preparing to land in Italy. The Red Army was building up its power. The only hope for victory was a powerful, crushing blow on the main front - the Russian.


Operation "Citadel"


For the offensive, a ledge was chosen, which went west of Kursk into the location of the German army for almost 200 km along the front and 120 km in depth. The plan of the German command was to strike from the north from the area south of Orel and from the south from the Belgorod area, to close both shock wedges east of Kursk, to surround and destroy large enemy forces located on the Kursk ledge. A decisive success with insignificant own losses made it possible to seize the initiative and develop the offensive.

Due to the concentration of forces, the exposure of neighboring sectors of the front and the use of almost all the newly formed operational reserves, the Germans created a powerful strike force, numbering up to 50 divisions (including 34 tank and motorized), 4 tank brigades, 6 separate tank battalions and 8 divisions of assault guns . The total number, according to Soviet data, was about 1 million people, about 10 thousand guns, more than 2 thousand aircraft and over 2,7 thousand tanks and self-propelled guns.

The command of the troops was carried out by Field Marshal von Kluge (Army Group Center) and Field Marshal Manstein (Army Group South). Organizationally, the strike forces were part of the 2nd Tank, 2nd and 9th Armies (commander - Field Marshal Model, Army Group Center, Orel region) and the 4th Tank Army, the 24th Tank Corps and operational Kempf group (commander - General Goth, Army Group South, Belgorod region). The 2nd SS Panzer Corps (southern front) included several elite SS Panzer Divisions: the 1st SS Panzer Division "Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler", the 2nd SS Panzer Division "Reich", the 3rd SS Panzer Division " Dead Head".


Hitler constantly postponed the start of the operation. The Fuhrer wanted to use as many of the new Panther tanks as possible in the operation, which had recently been put into mass production and had high hopes for them. The tense situation in Western Europe, especially in Italy, also played a role.

The preparation of the Germans for an offensive against the Kursk salient was discovered by Soviet intelligence. The Red Army was well prepared: a defense in depth, saturated with anti-personnel and anti-tank barriers, was created, especially powerful in the southern and northern parts of the Kursk salient. Large reserves were also formed, including powerful mobile formations.

On July 5, 1943, the Germans launched an offensive simultaneously from the north and south. However, despite all efforts, the use of all forces and resources, powerful air support, it did not work to break through the Russian defenses. The German 9th Army, advancing on a front of 90 km, managed to penetrate our defenses by only 10-12 km. More successful was the strike of the 4th Panzer Army in the southern sector. But even he did not bring decisive success, German tanks were able to cover 35 km with heavy fighting. On July 12, the Germans were stopped.

The Russian command, which had large reserves, responded not only with powerful counterattacks, but launched its own powerful offensive. As a result, the German army was defeated in the largest battle, and finally lost the initiative. The Russians seized the strategic initiative and did not give it up again until the end of the war.

The radical turning point in the Great Patriotic War was completed.


Burning German tank Pz. Kpfw. VI "Tiger" in the field during the operation "Citadel"


Soldiers of the Red Army inspect the German tanks Pz. Kpfw. V "Panther", shot down on the Kursk Bulge


Officers and soldiers of the Red Army on the tank of the Wehrmacht "Panther" Pz. Kpfw. V Ausf. D, captured during the fighting on the Kursk Bulge
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    5 July 2023 05: 22
    Probably correct to write Soviet, USSR.
    1. +19
      5 July 2023 05: 39
      It is useless to explain this to Samsonov. He writes about the Soviet era, but deliberately distorts the concept, names, terms
      1. +18
        5 July 2023 07: 12
        To the author for the article minus 2 on the twelve-point system. Where is the editor looking? "Military Review" seems to be an authoritative resource. It is not clear at all why such, so to speak, "articles" come out. request
        1. +10
          5 July 2023 08: 22
          It is not clear at all why such, so to speak, "articles" come out.
          So, like, the author is the editor of the "History" section. I have been reading the comments for a long time now.
          1. +6
            5 July 2023 11: 58
            Quote: Aviator_
            It is not clear at all why such, so to speak, "articles" come out.
            So, like, the author is the editor of the "History" section. I have been reading the comments for a long time now.

            Good day, Sergey! hi
            Not only is he the editor of this department, he is also the chief Department of History!
            Proof: find the line "About the publication" and click on it. And when you get to the line of the "History" section, you will see the following:
            Head of Department: Alexander Samsonov

            Historian: Vyacheslav Shpakovsky

            Historian: Valery Ryzhov

            These are the cakes ...
            1. +4
              5 July 2023 16: 55
              Good afternoon, Artyom. As Gradsky sang in the film "Romance of the Lovers" - "This song will be sad ..." One thing reassures - in the comments of these opuses you can communicate quite soundly with like-minded people.
              1. +2
                5 July 2023 21: 59
                Quote: Aviator_
                Good afternoon, Artyom. As Gradsky sang in the film "Romance of the Lovers" - "This song will be sad ..." One thing reassures - in the comments of these opuses you can communicate quite soundly with like-minded people.

                Yes, and so ... Unfortunately, I don’t see any point in commenting under his articles.
        2. +1
          6 July 2023 20: 18
          An authoritative resource looks into the mouth of the authorities, no matter what they say.
    2. -15
      5 July 2023 06: 58
      Quote from: Derbes19
      Probably correct to write Soviet, USSR.

      I didn't even pay attention to that! Soviet, Russian... what's the difference? Do you think Soviet non-Russian or what? Then what? American?

      It seems to me that only Ukrainians can think about the Soviet. Say, Soviet achievements are not Russian!
      1. +20
        5 July 2023 07: 14
        In general, there is a difference. Soviet-multinational. We must not forget about other people, nationalities. Who worked and defended their homeland. A single country
        1. -13
          5 July 2023 07: 47
          Quote from: dmi.pris1
          We must not forget about other people, nationalities

          And no one forgets. But we must not forget about the Russian backbone nation. And this, unfortunately, often happens. They are trying to blur the concept of Russian and Russian. Blur, reduce the value.

          The Russian state has always been multinational since Ivan the Terrible. And the Russian empire was even more multinational than the Soviet state (at an early stage, for sure).
      2. +3
        5 July 2023 08: 32
        Quote: Stas157
        Quote from: Derbes19
        Probably correct to write Soviet, USSR.

        I didn't even pay attention to that! Soviet, Russian... what's the difference? Do you think Soviet non-Russian or what? Then what? American?

        It seems to me that only Ukrainians can think about the Soviet. Say, Soviet achievements are not Russian!
        .. Explain what's the difference?? It's possible....

        Even a no brainer that the Soviet was both Russian and Ukrainian and Tatar and Jewish.

        And Russian could easily be anti-Soviet. And it was precisely this Russian - - that eventually defeated all the Soviet winners and ripped the country to pieces ....

        Who rushed about with his Yeltsin the most and yelled: "Enough for us to feed everyone Russians?"
        1. +9
          5 July 2023 11: 21
          Quote: ivan2022
          Who rushed about with his Yeltsin the most and yelled: "Enough for us to feed everyone Russians?"

          Everyone then rushed about with their small-town kings. The remaining 14 republics were firmly convinced that it was they who fed hungry, lazy and also drinking older brother ©.
          Here is an example of propaganda in the Ukrainian SSR:
    3. 0
      5 July 2023 21: 31
      Apparently the author is trying to avoid repetition in every second line. It's not that I'm a critic. But one could replace "Russian" with a lot.
      For example: our army, such and such a front under command, fighters of such and such an army, ....etc. ) And then somehow the rumor cuts: the Russian army. As if there was no USSR
  2. +13
    5 July 2023 05: 33
    Russian command,


    Konstantin Konstantinovich Rokossovsky was a Pole.
    (Polish Konstanty Rokossowski, birth name - Konstantin Ksaverievich Rokosovsky)

    Is this unknown to the author? belay
    1. +3
      5 July 2023 07: 11
      Quote: Sea Cat
      Konstantin Konstantinovich Rokossovsky was Pole.

      Well, Kutuzov had a lot of German officers. The chief of staff was German. But that didn't detract in any way. Russian army in the war of 1812.
    2. +8
      5 July 2023 08: 37
      The author apparently adheres to translated sources. In the West, everyone who is in Russia is considered "russians". The Anglo-Saxon traditions of modern authors interrupt everything else ......
      Like a spoonful of shit in a barrel of obligatory "patriotic honey".
  3. +13
    5 July 2023 06: 41
    The Nazis could no longer conduct an offensive along the entire front, as during the campaign 1943 year, or in one strategic direction, as in 1942.

    Is this a typo or a new vision of the history of the Second World War? And the rest is a standard set of stereotypes, like "radical change" .... And of course phrases are pissed off
    The Russian army blocked and destroyed
  4. 0
    5 July 2023 07: 33
    The Nazis had planned the offensive since the winter, but repeatedly postponed it, waiting either for the end of the thaw, or for the arrival of German tanks on the front. It was expected that the German "cats" were an order of magnitude superior to everything that the Russians had, and would ensure a quick and impressive victory. We miscalculated.
    Kursk 1943? Yes, but also Ukraine 2023. Moreover, the description corresponds to the last word in both cases.
    1. +8
      5 July 2023 09: 28
      Quote: Nagan
      Miscalculated.

      They miscalculated only with the density of defense and the saturation of our orders with troops. Their tanks really were completely superior to ours (Panthers and Tigers), they were too tough for our anti-tank guns. In the North, we defended more successfully due to the incorrect determination of the main attack by the Germans (we believed that the largest forces were in the north), respectively, the saturation was higher than in the south, plus Rokosovsky was better as a military leader than Vatutin, well, the terrain contributed to the defense. In the south, our defense lines were broken through quickly enough and the Germans near Prokhorovka were already reaching the rear lines. Manstein abandoned the offensive due to the fact that our neighboring fronts began active offensive operations, there was no point in this offensive. The Battle of Kursk just showed that passive defense, no matter how strong, is overcome much faster than one might hope.
      1. 0
        5 July 2023 14: 13
        Quote: qqqq
        Their tanks really were completely superior to ours (Panthers and Tigers), they were too tough for our anti-tank guns.

        It is a myth. Let's start with the fact that in the PTO we had a lot of anti-aircraft guns 76,2 II and 85 mm, which were forbidden to be used against aircraft, but only against tanks. These tanks were quite "too tough" for them and at good ranges. In the anti-tank system, there were also many ZIS-3s, which already had HEAT rounds capable of hitting these tanks, when fired from ambush and from a distance of less than 500 meters. 45-mm anti-tank guns also developed their own tactics of fighting tanks, letting them in on a "pistol shot", opening fire on the tracks in order to break the drive wheel and force the tank to turn around.
        It was on the Kursk Bulge that the Germans especially appreciated our skill in creating anti-tank guns. And they managed to overcome it, only in close cooperation with artillery and aviation, as soon as this interaction was disrupted, they retreated and tried to find gaps in our defense, where the PTO was not so strong
        1. +1
          6 July 2023 09: 08
          Quote: svp67
          It is a myth.

          Let's start with the fact that 76 mm were not very effective, only the side, and even the ZIS-3, and even more so 45 mm against the Tiger and Panther, and there were also Ferdinands, only the side and almost point-blank. As they said about 45 ku: Fear of the enemy - p-ets calculation. Once again, it is clear that tactics can be used to deal with any threat, but we did not have a battlefield weapon ready to hit heavy German tanks at a decent distance. The Germans suffered the main losses in the minefields. The tactics of the Germans to break through the defense was always the same, they were looking for gaps and, as a rule, they were found. Pounding forehead is not their style. As an example, I read that on the southern front, most of the PTO facilities were not involved. The inefficiency of stationary defense is confirmed by our losses and the speed with which our defense lines were hacked and passed. The Battle of Kursk was won by the fronts on the flanks, which, at the most critical moment when Manstein entered the rear lines, began their offensive.
          1. 0
            6 July 2023 11: 06
            Quote: qqqq
            Let's start with the fact that 76 mm were not very effective, only the side, and even the ZIS-3, and even more so 45 mm against the Tiger and Panther, and there were also Ferdinands, only the side and almost point-blank.

            The biggest problem was not even insufficient armor penetration, but tactics. Only in 1943 did the PTA begin to reduce the range of opening fire of PTPs - first to the range of a guaranteed hit on the target, and then to the penetration range. And before that, pre-war ideas dominated that anti-tank guns should open fire from a direct shot range. In practice, this meant that there were at least a minimum of hits, no penetrations - on the other hand, the positions of the PTP were unmasked, and enemy artillery began to work on them.
            Quote: qqqq
            Pounding forehead is not their style.

            Ponyri. smile
            As well as the enchanting debut of "Panther" and "Fed".
            1. +1
              6 July 2023 14: 25
              Reduced the distance is not from a good life. Ponyri is the northern front, there was not much room for maneuver. Well, Rokosovsky is not Vatutin. The debut of the Panthers is smeared with their dampness, the Panther itself is an excellent tank. Ferdinands are stuck in our minefields, and the concept of a super-heavy tank is, so-so, very specific. Although if you go into battle against the PTO of that time, then I would prefer Ferdinand, well, or the Tiger. But again, it's all about people. As an example, in 41 our tanks were qualitatively superior to German ones, but we merged almost all tank battles, and in 45 the situation was radically opposite, with the qualitative superiority of German tanks, they had no chance.
              1. 0
                6 July 2023 17: 12
                Quote: qqqq
                Reduced the distance is not from a good life.

                So it began to be reduced only in the third year of the war. Although the Germans were crawling with silver carps already in 1942. And the inability of the 45 mm to penetrate the forehead of the "three" and "four" that came to us in June 1941 was known half a year before the war.
                Quote: qqqq
                The debut of the Panthers is smeared with their dampness, the Panther itself is an excellent tank.

                The debut of the "Panthers" was smeared with an enchanting organizational structure, into which the regiment was stuffed. As well as the complete insecurity of the headquarters of this structure with personnel and equipment. As a result, the "Panther" regiment spent half a day cosplaying the Soviet mechanized corps from the time of the border battle, trying without communication with naked tanks to break through the defenses of the Soviet infantry, reinforced by minefields and attached artillery, including the IPTA. The end is a bit predictable - by the end of the day there were about 40 Panthers left in two battalions.
                Quote: qqqq
                Ferdinands are stuck in our minefields, and the concept of a super-heavy tank is, so-so, very specific.

                So the fact of the matter is that "Fedya" is not a tank. This is a tank destroyer of the battlefield, which should work from behind the backs of tanks, knocking out targets dangerous for them and ignoring the fire of enemy anti-tank guns. And the German commanders, tempted by the armor, decided to use them as TTs.
                In general, not only we confused tanks and self-propelled guns.
          2. Eug
            -1
            6 July 2023 16: 24
            I was always surprised how accurately the Germans identified the weak points of our defense. Their offensive on the southern flank - constant changes in the direction of the main attack of the day, not radical, but nonetheless. But it was necessary not only to determine the direction, but also to regroup the troops with everything necessary. And Manstein gnawed through the defense very confidently, the hasty deployment of a counteroffensive on a very uncomfortable terrain near Prokhorovka is the most real evidence of this.
        2. +2
          6 July 2023 10: 53
          Quote: svp67
          In the anti-tank system, there were also many ZIS-3s, which already had HEAT rounds capable of hitting these tanks, when fired from ambush and from a distance of less than 500 meters.

          In 1943, 76-mm guns with divisional ballistics (ZIS-3, USV, etc.) did not have a cumulative projectile - due to a well-known problem with projectile bursts in the barrel.
          76-mm "kuma" in 1943 was only for regimental guns with a lower projectile speed (and big problems because of this when firing at a moving target).
          At the shooting of the "Tiger" in 1943, the 76-mm division (in the tank version) showed the worst results of the guns that hit the target, yielding even to the 45-mm anti-tank guns - not a single penetration by any type of shells
          A real fiasco turned out to be a test of shelling a German heavy tank from a 76-mm tank gun F-34. Not one hit ended with a break, even when fired from a distance of 200 meters. This also applies to armor-piercing, and experienced sub-caliber, and experienced cumulative shells. In the case of an armor-piercing shell, the low quality of its manufacture was noted. But in the described period it was the main Soviet tank gun!
          © Y. Pasholok
          Why from hitting the target? Because three guns on those tests generally managed to miss:
          ... out of all these guns, three (107-mm M-60 cannon, 122-mm M-30 howitzer and 152-mm ML-20 howitzer gun) did not hit the target, despite the fact that the weather was clear.

          Quote: svp67
          45-mm anti-tank guns also developed their own tactics of fighting tanks, letting them in on a "pistol shot", opening fire on the tracks in order to break the drive wheel and force the tank to turn around.

          The 45-mm tank gun in tests pierced the 80-mm side armor with a sub-caliber projectile from 200 m.
          45 mm anti-tank mod. 1942 pierced the same armor with a sub-caliber projectile from 350 m.
  5. +6
    5 July 2023 07: 56
    Operation "Citadel": an attempt by the German army to regain the initiative
    I no longer agree with the title itself. By the summer of 1943, the Germans just regained the initiative by carrying out a successful operation and throwing our troops back, once again from Kharkov, having beaten them very badly, especially our tank troops. So much so that they had to be restored again
    1. +8
      5 July 2023 09: 41
      By the way, the Prokhorov massacre is gracefully bypassed
      1. +4
        5 July 2023 14: 06
        Honestly, even the mention of the battle near Prokhorovka surprised me. I wonder what he would give out ... Would he really write about an oncoming tank battle?
  6. +10
    5 July 2023 08: 01
    With the exception of the listing of German compounds, the article differs little from the articles in school textbooks of the Soviet period. What is she for? What's new? What unknown facts, details, reasons for our victory that would not have been voiced before? Just to mark the anniversary of the start of the Battle of Kursk? It could have been simpler: "80 years ago the Battle of Kursk began, the victory in which the USSR marked the final turning point in the war."
    1. +9
      5 July 2023 09: 46
      Articles in Soviet textbooks are better. smile
  7. +6
    5 July 2023 08: 05
    The total number, according to Soviet data, was about 1 million people, about 10 thousand guns, more than 2 thousand aircraft and over 2,7 thousand tanks and self-propelled guns.
    And what do the Germans themselves say about the number of their troops? laughing
    1. +5
      5 July 2023 11: 23
      Quote: kor1vet1974
      And what do the Germans themselves say about the number of their troops? laughing

      And the Germans traditionally consider active bayonets and serviceable equipment of the first echelon. smile
    2. 0
      7 July 2023 08: 51
      Yes, as usual...their numbers were clearly insufficient.

      "There were five of us, twenty-five of them and both with brass knuckles ..." laughing
  8. +5
    5 July 2023 08: 13
    The radical turning point in the Great Patriotic War was completed.


    To cast such a phrase in granite recourse , something new in the history of the Second World War. In fact, the completion of a radical change is the crossing of the Dnieper, which ended on December 23, 1943, and I hope this will happen again in December 2023.
  9. +4
    5 July 2023 10: 31
    Hmm, not only are there anti-Soviet bookmarks in the article, nothing new has been said yet.
    Meanwhile, few researchers pay attention to the fact that perhaps the main factor why the German bet on new armored vehicles did not work was aviation.
    For the Germans, the hitherto beloved "bast shoes" turned into targets due to the growth of the Soviet IA.
    But that's not all, much more important is the fact that Soviet aviation received the world's first truly anti-tank weapons, the same PTAB. From that moment on, any pilot, even a novice, was guaranteed to disable any tank. This is when an attack on deployed battle formations. A much greater effect was given by the use of PTAB in columns. But a quick regrouping, the transfer of forces, was the basis of German tactics.
    1. +3
      5 July 2023 11: 35
      so nothing new has been said yet.
      Don't you see that this is a translation from a foreign source? How would they know? laughing
    2. +3
      5 July 2023 13: 47
      For the Germans, the hitherto beloved "bast shoes" turned into targets due to the growth of the Soviet IA.
      But that's not all, much more important is the fact that Soviet aviation received the world's first truly anti-tank weapons, the same PTAB.

      Manstein stopped due to the termination of proper aviation support, so our Il-2 attack aircraft could storm the battle formations of the Wehrmacht with impunity, since on July 9 the Allies launched a landing operation in Sicily and on July 13 a meeting was held at Hitler's headquarters, at which it was decided to stop the offensive from the Oryol direction of the 9th Army of the Model and the transfer of aviation to counter the landing. Also during Operation Citadel in July 1943, the 6th Air Fleet, reinforced by aircraft from the 1st Air Fleet, sent about 1000 aircraft to the Center Army Group operating in the Oryol Region. In addition, the US 8th Air Force and RAF Bomber Command's air offensive against Germany and France intensified in July, prompting the dispatch of some fighter units to Europe.
      1. +4
        5 July 2023 14: 09
        The effectiveness of the ptabs was still lower than expected, but nonetheless. And it’s a pity that ZIS 2 didn’t really have time in mass quantities for the battle.
        1. +2
          5 July 2023 18: 37
          The effectiveness of the ptabs was still lower than expected, but nonetheless. And it’s a pity that ZIS 2 didn’t really have time in mass quantities for the battle.


          The effectiveness of the PTAB was lower at the time of the first strikes, until the optimal heights and release rates were determined.
      2. +2
        5 July 2023 18: 35
        Manstein stopped due to the termination of proper aviation support, so our Il-2 attack aircraft could storm the battle formations of the Wehrmacht with impunity, since on July 9 the Allies launched a landing operation in Sicily and on July 13 a meeting was held at Hitler's headquarters, at which it was decided to stop the offensive from the Oryol direction of the 9th Army of the Model and the transfer of aviation to counter the landing. Also during Operation Citadel in July 1943, the 6th Air Fleet, reinforced by aircraft from the 1st Air Fleet, sent about 1000 aircraft to the Center Army Group operating in the Oryol Region. In addition, the US 8th Air Force and RAF Bomber Command's air offensive against Germany and France intensified in July, prompting the dispatch of some fighter units to Europe.


        There is no need to repeat Western mantras about how the Allies pulled back forces and thereby helped near Kursk. The Germans were well aware that the fate of the war was being decided on the eastern front in order to respond to a pinprick in Sicily.
        And our attack aircraft acted with impunity because the IA RKKA had already gained strength.
        Everything else is the whining of the beaten, who would definitely have won if they had not been "held by the hands."
  10. +6
    5 July 2023 13: 38
    Why this article? It is written about what is known from a to z. The article should not be like a paragraph from an encyclopedia, but like a story about some episode, an unknown fact, then this is an article. The author and editors of VO have a fat minus for clogging the site.
  11. +4
    5 July 2023 14: 01
    Samsonov, is that you again? Russian .. Actually Soviet ..
  12. +7
    5 July 2023 14: 03
    If a student had told me like this in a history lesson, I would have given him a maximum C mark. Having the opportunity to study the works of Zamulin to publish such a shameful
  13. +1
    5 July 2023 14: 14
    Good afternoon! hi
    As for the article ... this article, in my opinion, is dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the start of the Battle of Kursk. It was here that the final turning point took place during the Great Patriotic War. After this battle, Soviet aviation dominated. Also, basically, our troops were advancing, and not the Germans and their henchmen.
    Of course, a break does not mean a final victory. The Germans resisted and sometimes carried out very painful counterattacks. But no more. Due to the losses suffered by the Germans, they were unable to undertake major offensives and were mostly on the defensive.
    Eternal memory to our compatriots who died in this war!
    1. +2
      5 July 2023 14: 31
      Eternal memory to our compatriots who died in this war!

      Eternal glory to the dead relatives! Glory to the Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Tatars, Mordovians, all the Soviet people, and not to compatriots ... they would still write to the Russians.
  14. +3
    5 July 2023 16: 53
    Good day everyone. If nothing urgent happens: an epidemic, an explosion of a bridge, I will go to Crimea on Friday
  15. +3
    5 July 2023 18: 05
    What yellow sheet is this translation from?
  16. +2
    5 July 2023 20: 54
    I want to ask the author a question, but, to be honest, I do not believe that he will answer me. Why on 05.07.2023/1943/45 when writing this article to describe the plans of the enemy (the German army) do you use the Soviet map, and not the German one? Really, all German maps with arrows burned down in XNUMX-XNUMX? Many responsible authors do not hesitate to use enemy cards in their articles. Yes, it may not always be convenient, in the sense of reading the names of settlements, but it definitely shows the level of work of the author. And here, as if you are reading an article from the TSB or SES. Where is the original research?
  17. 0
    7 July 2023 08: 59
    Quote: Sea Cat
    Konstantin Konstantinovich Rokossovsky was a Pole.
    (Polish Konstanty Rokossowski, birth name - Konstantin Ksaverievich Rokosovsky)

    Is this unknown to the author?


    Ethnic origin does not play a role from the word at all, what matters is citizenship and belonging of the army (to which a particular character swore allegiance) to a particular state. K.K. Rokossovsky was a Soviet citizen and commander of the Red Army of the USSR. Dot.
  18. 0
    7 July 2023 09: 09
    Quote: Stas157
    And no one forgets. But we must not forget about the Russian backbone nation. And this, unfortunately, often happens. They are trying to blur the concept of Russian and Russian. Blur, reduce the value.


    By promoting such theses, the USSR was destroyed. Since this thesis is precisely of an anti-power nature.
    Well, nothing new. And the Byzantine Empire passed its point of no return, when many Roman Byzantines suddenly realized that in fact they were Greeks and that it was enough for them to "blur".

    It is internationalism (in the best sense) that is one of the most characteristic national features of Russians ... when Russians begin to ignore this, trouble is not far off for them.

    German, French are nouns. Russian is an adjective. But an adjective is attached to a noun. And what is this noun?
  19. 0
    7 July 2023 14: 13
    Firstly, where did the terms Red Army and Soviet go? In addition, the main reasons for the failure of the "Citadel" are not reflected in any way - namely, the competent distribution of forces by the Soviet command at the strategic level. When the breakthrough of the defense of the Voronezh Front almost to the entire depth was stopped by the introduction of reserves in the threatened direction, with simultaneous strikes of entire fresh fronts in the rear of Model and in the flank of Manstein. In fact, the battle of Kursk was won by the Soviet command even at the level of strategic planning. Well, how is this reflected in the article? No way...
    1. -2
      7 July 2023 14: 38
      In fact, the battle of Kursk was won by the Soviet command even at the level of strategic planning.

      Strategic planning in the Battle of Kursk was also conditioned by the actions of the allies agreed with us, i.e. the landing of allied troops in Italy and the beginning of a massive bombardment of Germany.
      with simultaneous strikes of entire fresh fronts to the rear of the Model

      Orel left the model very timely, although ours planned to encircle the 9th Army there. But Model famously got out of the way, as in Operation Buffel, when ours could not catch up with the two armies retreating from Rzhev. In addition, the offensive at that time of the "fresh" Bryansk and Kalinin fronts forced the transfer of more than ten divisions from the Kursk direction.