As a result of the accident at the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, the front line in the Ukrainian conflict was temporarily reduced by about 120 km

18
As a result of the accident at the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, the front line in the Ukrainian conflict was temporarily reduced by about 120 km

In connection with the situation in the lower reaches of the Dnieper, after the emergency at the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, offensive and counter-offensive operations in this sector of the front are becoming unlikely. This is also made clear in Kyiv, where an adviser to the head of Zelensky’s office, Podolyak, said that “now the counteroffensive plans will have to be adjusted.”

In the West, the topic is picked up, making it clear that because of the situation at the Kakhovka reservoir, a lot did not go according to plan. At the same time, quite sober and reasonable judgments appear in the West against the backdrop of frenzied anti-Russian propaganda. They come down to the fact that if Russia really wanted to flood the territories downstream of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, it could simply open the floodgates, "stating their technical malfunction." Blowing up a large hydroelectric power plant under the control of the RF Armed Forces made no practical sense for Russia when there was a much simpler alternative.



Now the situation is such that the front in the armed conflict in Ukraine has been significantly reduced. For the Russian troops, the reduction of the NVO front is about 120 km. This is the approximate distance from the mouth of the Dnieper to Novaya Kakhovka.



This could be seen as a big plus only for the defending side. And Russia has recently acted as such in the southern direction. But there is a medal, as always, and the reverse side. It consists in the fact that the Ukrainian troops, at least in the next month and a half, will not have to think about how to translate into reality the overseas directives about the need, sacrificing themselves, to force the Dnieper.

In such a situation, the Ukrainian command faces a dilemma. On the one hand, for a while, you can forget about forcing the Dnieper in the section from Kizomys to Kazatsky (on the other side of Novaya Kakhovka), exhale with relief and transfer troops, for example, to the South Donetsk direction or near Artemovsk. On the other hand, there is also an option when the Russian army can take advantage of the situation in the south, in the event of the withdrawal of large forces and the concentration, for example, of sufficiently large forces of the marines in a number of sectors. The Ukrainian command will clearly be afraid of the Russian “seaside” breakthrough, which, under certain conditions, can allow it to enter not only the Nikolaev region, but also the Odessa region.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    18 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +6
      6 June 2023 18: 49
      Plus, not only for the defenders.
      1. -1
        6 June 2023 19: 53
        Quote from: dmi.pris1
        Plus, not only for the defenders.

        Take a deeper look.
        Now the situation is such that the front in the armed conflict in Ukraine significantly reduced. For the Russian troops, the reduction of the NVO front is about 120 km.

        Front lengthened 120 km (and the question is how equipped it is for defense). Why is everyone only looking downstream? And above the dam, the water barrier will not be reduced? Do we have anything significant there?
        1. +5
          6 June 2023 20: 27
          The front has neither lengthened nor contracted. The Dnieper became a little wider and deeper due to the release of water. But now our defensive structures went to the bottom, since our coast is lower. Dangerous situation.
      2. -1
        6 June 2023 20: 24
        , which means they can transfer forces to the Zaporozhye direction. We must be prepared for this

        Shoigu already said about this that there was only one territorial defense left on the other side and began to actively dig in.
    2. +3
      6 June 2023 18: 51
      The stick is always double-edged. Here, just to relax, even for a while, is not worth it. The enemy will strike exactly where they are relaxed. Tested by time and bitter experience.
    3. 0
      6 June 2023 18: 55
      Well, how slowly we always harness,
      But then the hell stop us ...
      We know it, we understand it
      But we do it every time...
      Well, then, we, straining our strength,
      Trying to overcome the enemy
      And we are waiting for Russia to inspire us,
      Or maybe we just need to be wiser?!
      We must always be ready for war
      We have enemies everywhere to hell -
      So why aren't we ready again
      When we have a war going on in our country...???
      With the enemy again we play nobility,
      He is as always insidious and cunning -
      He fights, showing bestiality to us,
      And we still haven't figured it out...
      Why, although we know for sure
      War will come to our peaceful father's house,
      We forget about her all the time.
      And as before, we spit on it ??? 
      1. 0
        6 June 2023 19: 36
        Mihan, you can be seen in any form wassat short text and other
    4. +8
      6 June 2023 18: 56
      For the Russian troops, the reduction of the NVO front is about 120 km.

      It became smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines, and walk along them. This is who, I wonder, such a smart one was found, the front was reduced?
    5. +4
      6 June 2023 18: 56
      As a result of the accident at the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, the front line in the Ukrainian conflict was temporarily reduced by about 120 km

      Nothing has been reduced, the DRGs can now easily pass on boats, and when the water subsides and the earth dries out, they will have to quickly return the defensive lines again.
    6. 0
      6 June 2023 19: 08
      Too many unknowns, whether the dam will stand is also unclear. Because all these forecasts are about nothing, shaking the air. We are waiting for real information.
    7. +1
      6 June 2023 19: 11
      It is not clear who was currently in control of the dam?
      everywhere they write as it is streamlined, it is not clear ...

      Surely there were surveillance cameras, monitoring, etc.
    8. -5
      6 June 2023 19: 17
      the courage of the city takes, but this does not apply to the current supreme, his credo is to wait, he is waiting
      1. 0
        6 June 2023 19: 26
        And I suppose you are Yashka, an artilleryman from Chernobaevka (there was a regional madhouse).
    9. 0
      6 June 2023 19: 24
      Nevertheless, continue to dispose of ukrovoysko through the Dnieper.
    10. 0
      6 June 2023 19: 40
      It is necessary to strictly respond to any manifestation of the terrorist activities of the Ukrainian Nazis am
      1. -4
        6 June 2023 19: 43
        As you say, only under the world laughs at the red lines
    11. -1
      6 June 2023 19: 48
      and they can attack on boats, and they cut off Nikolaev and Odessa
    12. +7
      6 June 2023 20: 06
      Nonsense! Now the explosion of the dam is presented to us as a "overcome"!
      The dam protected the lower reaches of the Dnieper better than the trenches, as long as we controlled it. It is necessary, the valves are opened - it is necessary, they are closed. No intelligible movement of the APU downstream was possible while we controlled this structure. Now control is lost. Who was supposed to follow this and who "fell in love" - ​​the question is apparently unanswered.
      All this "infonoise" - "who blew it up, how they blew it up" is just to divert attention.
      After 10 days, the Armed Forces of Ukraine can do whatever they want in the lower reaches of the Dnieper, without fear that they will be washed away at the most inopportune moment. In 20 days, a new front may form over a distance of 120 km above the dam. What are we going to cover?
      PS: Such a large-scale "landscape design" indicates the extremely serious intentions of the enemy hi

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"