The Russian delegation intends to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council because of the destruction of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station

The Russian delegation intends to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council in connection with the explosion, as a result of which the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station was destroyed. This was announced by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vasily Nebenzya.

According to the Russian permanent representative, the corresponding meeting will be convened without delay, but the exact time of the event is still unknown.

Nebenzya also commented on the accusations against the Russian side that the Russian Armed Forces allegedly undermined the infrastructure of the Kakhovskaya HPP. The permanent representative questioned the mental health of those who made such accusations, and also stressed the impossibility of the Russian army carrying out sabotage, which resulted in the flooding of the territory under Russian control.

Earlier it was reported that as a result of shelling by militants of the Kyiv regime, the upper part of the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station was destroyed. Presumably, the blow was delivered with the use of the Alder MLRS. According to the authorities of the Novokakhovsk city district, the valves regulating the discharge of water were destroyed on the dam, but the dam itself was not damaged.

Currently, there is an unregulated discharge of water from the Kakhovka reservoir, as a result of which the water level in the area of ​​​​the settlement of Novaya Kakhovka has risen by ten meters, potentially the maximum increase in the water level can reach 12 meters. Three coastal villages were completely submerged.

Comments

[Bingo]

A flood of this magnitude is classified as a humanitarian disaster. So the call is justified.
Another thing is that again everyone will play the ostrich, but it's still useful, because on the w. for the actions of the United States and Selyansky, all ostriches will fly, which may affect their desire to continue to substitute their f. for the fascists and their slaves and Peremogadishu

[Terenin]

The Permanent Representative questioned the mental health of people which side such accusations were made

I'll guess three times right now...
... really Anglo-Saxons!?

[smart ass]

What is the meaning of this action? UN is a six mattress? In general, it is necessary to take all diplomats home and it is better to leave the UN to save money on 5 pieces of T90 more to buy them more needed.

[Alister kroulegg]

Russia has the right of veto in the Security Council, this is important. "Superfluous" diplomats must be taken out, of course, but it is impossible to leave the UN. This can only be offered by an enemy of Russia. I hope that you are not an enemy, but just not a very smart person

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Clever man

What is the meaning of this action? UN is a six mattress? In general, it is necessary to take all diplomats home and it is better to leave the UN to save money on 5 pieces of T90 more to buy them more needed.

Shut up in a rag? If no one hears you, then you are not there. So it is in world politics. The Russian representative will come to the main podium of the world and tell the truth. Who needs to hear everything. Whether they like it or not.

[carpenter]

Quote: Clever man

What is the meaning of this action? UN is a six mattress?

While they are thinking in Russia, ukry are already doing it.
Representatives of Ukraine initiated a meeting of the UN Security Council due to the destruction of the dam (due to their sabotage) and called on the G7 countries and the EU to immediately consider imposing new sanctions on the Russian Federation.
Attack, best defense and prosecution.
The exit must be tough, when they hit hard, then the ukry understand. The answer should be the same, but next to Kiev and upstream, when the Zelekhmanovsky cellar with cocaine is flooded.

[carpenter]

Quote from Bingo

A flood of this magnitude is classified as a humanitarian disaster. So the call is justified.

This is called - "chewing snot", Ruin and the West will blame Russia. Therefore, it is necessary to smash either the dams, or the hydroelectric power station upstream, from the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, and the beam in the Kyiv region, then the Nazis will come to their senses. If you do not answer, wait for the ZNPP.

[Repellent]

Quote: carpenter

This is called - "chew snot" ... you need to smash either the dams, or the hydroelectric power station upstream, from the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station

A very smart decision. Water flows down from above, and floods even more.

Is that exactly what you want?

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote from Bingo

again everyone will play ostrich

When an ostrich sticks its muzzle into the sand, something can still bring it out of this state,
and when he sticks his muzzle into his own ass, it's irreparable.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Adrian28

and she will judge us.

Don't judge.
We still have the right of veto.

[Legate]

Because it happens on our territory. Russia was supposed to convene an internal Security Council and develop measures to eliminate the consequences and eliminate those who were involved in this. And not to arrange another whining at the UN, well, unless of course you have at least some respect for yourself

[Repellent]

Quote: Legate

Because it happens on our territory. Russia was supposed to convene an internal Security Council and develop measures to eliminate the consequences and eliminate those who were involved in this. And not arrange another whine at the UN

When your apartment is flooded with neighbors - set an example, do not contact the housing office, repair everything yourself. And to tell what and to whom "Russia owes" - you, excuse me, your nose has not matured.

That something like this.

[Adrian28]

Only here is the case when the housing office belongs to those who ordered your neighbors to flood you, and they will send you three letters and spit in your face.

[Repellent]

Quote: Adrian28

here is the case when the housing office belongs to those who ordered your neighbors to flood you

There is such a letter in this word.

Quote: Adrian28

you will be sent to three letters and spit in the face

You see... first of all, it's not that easy. Secondly, according to case law, I, too, will at least get the right to "send three letters and spit in the face." Which, you see, is still better than nothing.

And ninthly, this is the same information war, about which not every second one is worried about. The UN is still a tribune, and everyone who speaks from it is listening, and not just the "owners of the housing office."

Something like that.

[Adrian28]

But we pay membership fees not to spit on someone and be spat on by someone, but to eliminate the consequences of the neighbors' activities. This organization has not been performing its functions for a long time and I see no point in being in it.

[Repellent]

Quote: Adrian28

is in it, I do not see the point

And who are you, exactly? Also an expert in everything, like the previous speaker? Then go talk to him better.

The first rule of diplomacy is to keep the doors open. At least half. The UN is a very suitable place for communication at the level of states. And it is not for you to determine what the professionals should do. Buddy.

[Adrian28]

Of course, I do not define anything, but it is my right to criticize or support someone. The fact that these people are professionals is also a question. I don’t know the exploits of our diplomats, except to give the Chinese another island or express concern over what everyone is really laughing at.
About open doors. We also have doors in states that are neutral to us, and doors in some kind of den for which you still have to pay are of dubious usefulness. At UN meetings, a certain topic is discussed each time, and communication between countries takes place at state visits, forums and at the sites of organizations that are adapted for this.

[Repellent]

Quote: Adrian28

I don’t know the exploits of our diplomats

The key word is "I don't know". This is your grief, personal.

Quote: Adrian28

or express concern over what everyone is really laughing about

"Everyone is laughing" - very well shows the level of the evaluator. Continue...

Quote: Adrian28

doors in some kind of den for which you still have to pay are of dubious usefulness

I recommend asking, for example, what the UN Security Council is, what decisions it has the right to make, and which countries have the right to veto these decisions. The result will surprise you, I guarantee.

[Adrian28]

The key word is "I don't know". This is your grief, personal.

So give me an example, I'll be glad to hear something good.

I recommend asking what the UN Security Council is, what decisions it has the right to make and which countries have the right to veto these decisions. The result will surprise you, I guarantee.

The UN Security Council is a special body within the United Nations that is responsible for identifying, investigating and resolving any situation that threatens world peace. The Council has the right to take action against states that violate any UN conventions: for example, they can apply economic sanctions or even approve military intervention.

I don’t think this will help us reach an agreement with Japan on the Kuril Islands, for example. And in general, what does open doors and communication between countries have to do with it? There is one topic for discussion "situations threatening peace on earth."

[Repellent]

Quote: Adrian28

UN conventions: for example, they can apply economic sanctions or even approve military intervention

Quote: Adrian28

I don't think this will help us...

You are in a hurry again: before you "do not think", read all the same first about the right of veto, which allows you to block all these wonderful decisions. It's at the UN.

I give a beacon: from the Russian Federation this is true veto power in the UN Security Council.

[Adrian28]

When the United States did not receive UN permission to conduct Operation Allied Force
they just played it. So what does the UN still influence and why is it needed?

[Repellent]

Quote: Adrian28

What does the UN still influence and why is it needed?

You seem to misunderstand what you read. Try again, though: UN Charter, Articles 41 and 42. Just be careful, or I'll be disappointed in you.

[Adrian28]

Article 41
The Security Council is empowered to decide which non-military measures should be taken to implement its decisions, and it may require Members to take these measures. These measures may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations, rail, sea, air, postal, telegraph, radio or other means of communication, as well as the severance of diplomatic relations.

Article 42
Should the Security Council consider that the measures provided for in Article 41 may prove insufficient or have already proved insufficient, it shall be empowered to take such action by air, sea or land forces as will be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such actions may include demonstrations, blockades and other operations by air, sea or land forces of Members of the Organization.

I understand this very well, but if one of the founding states of the UN violates its instructions, then this organization has no value.

[Repellent]

Quote: Adrian28

I understand this very well, but if one of the founding states of the UN violates its instructions, then this organization has no value

You still managed to disappoint me.

- in Art. 41, 42 of the UN Charter spell out sanctions that can be applied by decision of the Security Council
- these are quite serious sanctions
- the right of veto of the Russian Federation in the Security Council allows you to prevent them, sanctions, application to the Russian Federation.

As you can see, everything is not simple, but very simple. Leaving the UN and giving away the "golden key" (right of veto) is no way. Either an enemy or a fool can insist on this.

Arivederchi, I'm tired of you. You are untrainable.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Repellent

the right of veto of the Russian Federation in the Security Council allows you to prevent them, sanctions, application to the Russian Federation.

:))) Yes, sure. True, almost 15 sanctions have been adopted against the Russian Federation, in spite of all its Security Council, but this, of course, is different.

[Repellent]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

but of course it's different

Of course, that's exactly what it is.

[Alister kroulegg]

Are these UN sanctions? Or are you proposing an additional 15000 sanctions already passed through the UN? and for what ?

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Alister Kroulegg

Are these UN sanctions?

Excuse me, is it easier for you from the absence of the word "UN" after the word "sanctions"? Or do you seriously think that there are some sanctions that the US and Europe cannot implement on their own, but they can do it through the UN?

[Adrian28]

What does the UN still influence and why is it needed?

You seem to misunderstand what you read. Try again, though: UN Charter, Articles 41 and 42. Just be careful, or I'll be disappointed in you. yes

Yes, these articles indicate why the UN is needed, but nevertheless it has little effect on anything.

[Adrian28]

I do not think that this will help us reach an agreement with Japan on the Kuril Islands, for example.

You are in a hurry again: before you "do not think", read all the same first about the right of veto, which allows you to block all these wonderful decisions. It's at the UN.

I give a beacon: the Russian Federation still has the right to veto in the UN Security Council.

In this case, I meant that the problem of the islands, in principle, is not discussed at the UN level and is not included in its sector of responsibility, like most problems.

[solar]

Which did not help in any way in the situation with the recognition of Russia as an aggressor state, which opened the way for assistance to Ukraine under Article 51 of the UN Charter.
It is not enough to have the right to veto; one must also know how to use it.

[Adrian28]

"Everyone is laughing" - very well shows the level of the evaluator. Continue...

I agree that there is a factual mistake, the enemies of Russia are laughing, and this causes a bitter smile for a simple Russian.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Legate

And not to arrange another whining at the UN, well, unless of course you have at least some respect for yourself

UN by the UN, but if the Guarantor is the Guarantor, then he must immediately respond.

[Repellent]

Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke

if the Guarantor is the Guarantor, then he must immediately respond

Huh.

To serve me a goldfish
And I would have been on my premises

[Mordvin 3]

Nebenzya.

Yes, everyone is laughing at him. Disgrace.

[vovochkarzhevsky]

Yes, everyone is laughing at him. Disgrace.

Speak the truth. It's embarrassing and painful to watch. It would be the height of cynicism if, instead of helping the flood-affected citizens of Russia, they celebrate Independence Day with pomp.

[fruc]

vovochkarzhevsky
...... will celebrate Independence Day with pomp.

Are you already preparing for the holiday, or will it come in August, flyer? Where did you fly?

[fruc]

Mordvin 3 ..... Yes, everyone is laughing at him. Disgrace.

Who laughs then, if only you personally? It's not a big deal. You said "A", now say "B".

[Adrian28]

Who laughs then, if only you personally? It's not a big deal. You said "A", now say "B".

Of course, I didn’t see anyone laughing at him, but most likely Vladimir wanted to say that everyone wanted to spit on him and what he would say since the UN belongs to the United States.

[vovochkarzhevsky]

Who laughs then, if only you personally? It's not a big deal. You said "A", now say "B".

Aren't you tired of puffing out your cheeks? Or do the patriots have no shame?
Here are the consequences of flooding, villages that have gone under water.

[solar]

This is a war crime under the Geneva Convention of 1949 - there is a direct ban on the destruction of dams if civilians can suffer because of this.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: frruc

Who laughs then, if only you personally? It's not a big deal. You said "A", now say "B".

I'll tell you. Somehow Nebenzya about the Kharkov offensive at the UN issued: "Two villages .... Yeah. And then Kherson, Kupyansk ... Villages, his mother is just like that ...

[Gnefredov]

Three coastal villages were completely submerged.

This is scary for sure

[Mordvin 3]

The Permanent Representative questioned the mental health of those who made such accusations

Oh, they have a white ticket.

[Boycott]

How many times did Nebenzya write to the UN chief, calling for an end to the shelling of the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station? Zero reactions. The UN has long outlived itself and will end up as a league of nations.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: BoyCat

The UN has long outlived itself and will end up as a league of nations.

Very similar to that.

[Alister kroulegg]

Will Russia blame or justify itself at this meeting?

With this destruction of the dam, not everything is clear, even more so. Arrivals were not recorded. There could be a cumulative effect, of course, from previous shelling and other things. But this needs to be proven. This requires the conclusion of specialists, and this will take more than one month. And Nebenzi has none of that on hand. Meeting for the sake of meeting and with a known result.

The Kremlin should have declared that Moscow was not involved in the destruction of the hydroelectric power station, a commission is working on the spot.
The results of the verification will be announced later.

ALL ! The rest is superfluous

[Old Horseradish]

Previously, they wrote that the dam has an increased margin of safety and is designed for a nuclear war. It is guaranteed to be covered by air defense, and even in the event of some hits, there will be no flooding. Then what was it that flew there if she was under such strong guards. And why couldn't the water have been released earlier? And who will explain to me what cascade destruction is with a margin of safety for a nuclear hit?

[Million]

Nebenzya will again mumble something sluggishly under his breath, no one will hear him. And tomorrow everything will be forgotten.

[Ezekiel 25-17]

You just need to declare war on Ukraine: stop playing games with the Nazi who seized power there and destroy his regime by any means.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Ezekiel 25-17

We just need to declare war on Ukraine:

Why do you think Russia has fought six wars in the thirty years of its existence?

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Mordvin 3

Why do you think Russia has fought six wars in the thirty years of its existence?

Let me clarify then: Soviet Russia, more precisely, the USSR.
Bourgeois Russia and Soviet absolutely different subjects.

[fa2998]

Quote: Legate

Because it happens on our territory.

And who let them into Kherson and onto the right bank of the Dnieper? Another reorganization. Did you think they would catch fish? There is also the Dnieper-Crimea canal, do you think it will work?

[Yapet100]

Again in this UN Nebenzya will whine, but what's the point of this ?!

[75 Sergey]

And because of the impending dirty bombs, isn't it?!

[Ezekiel 25-17]

Quote: mordvin xnumx

Quote: Ezekiel 25-17

We just need to declare war on Ukraine:

Why do you think Russia has fought six wars in the thirty years of its existence?

Russia has existed not for 30 years, but for at least 1100 calendar years: go and learn history.

[Wer best do]

Seven minuses instructed. These are the rub here. Delete from the history of the country a thousand years.

[auran]

I think it’s not necessary to collect the UN Security Council, but the Russian president to withdraw the diplomatic mission from London and warn the Russians to leave the island and start the countdown

[auran]

it is necessary to end this war and it will not work in Kyiv

[Fangaro]

To convene the Security Council with the topic of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, of undermining which we accuse Ukraine, and Ukraine accuses us.
And you can’t talk about Shebekino at the UN? Can't we talk about this at the UN about peaceful people who, due to continuous shelling, left their homes, finding shelter in temporary detention centers that turned out to be near the border of "peaceful Ukraine"?
In Kommersant, there is such an essay about civilians from Shebekino that the half-blind man thinks about how to help.

[Alister kroulegg]

Russia is the aggressor, according to the UN. So the shelling of Shebekino is justified for them. The Russian Foreign Ministry understands this. German and Japanese cities were mercilessly bombed as aggressors

[Mikhail Ivanov]

Call the penguins there, they won't even be able to vote against us... Figures... They collect... For so many years, they pissed off everything that our grandfathers earned with sweat and blood! My war in North Korea ended. If I saw our days, I would die of a heart attack ...

[Alister kroulegg]

And your grandfather did not tell why the Bandera people were not finished off and allowed to occupy many leadership positions?
And North Korea, represented by the Kims, is very grateful to your grandfather