Six Ukrainian missiles, including Tochka-U, were intercepted by Russian air defense over Berdyansk

Ukrainian armed formations continue to strike at cities located in the rear zone. On the eve of Kyiv made an attempt to strike at Berdyansk, but the Russian air defense system intercepted the missiles.

By supplying Ukraine with air-launched cruise missiles, the UK gave Kyiv the opportunity to strike at cities beyond the reach of artillery and MLRS. In Kyiv, this opportunity was used to its fullest, in recent days Mariupol and Berdyansk have become targets for missiles.

The day before, the Kiev regime again launched a missile attack on Berdyansk, Russian air defense intercepted six missiles over the city, one of which was Tochka-U with a cluster warhead. That is, in Kyiv they planned in advance to hit the civilian population, and the cluster warhead was supposed to lead to numerous victims. The remaining missiles intercepted by anti-aircraft systems were British Storm Shadow. At least, all the latest strikes on the rear areas were carried out with these missiles.

According to operational data, among the enemy missiles shot down over Berdyansk was one "Tochka-U" with a cluster warhead to inflict more casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure. Cluster warheads detonated mid-air

- the message of the administration of Berdyansk says.

At the moment, there is no information about any destruction in the city, the air defense was able to intercept all the missiles launched at the city. Prior to this, Kyiv managed to strike at the port of Berdyansk.

Comments

[dmi.pris1]

Where did "Point U" come from over Berdyansk with its flight range of a little more than a hundred miles? Or do we not know something?

[svp67]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

Where did "Point U" come from over Berdyansk with its flight range of a little more than a hundred miles?

120 km, with a conventional warhead. Just somewhere so much from Orekhov or Gulyai-Polye, but this is to the maximum, which means that the enemy deployed and launched a couple of kilometers from the LBS ... And this suggests that we do not have the proper amount of technical equipment there reconnaissance, in order to monitor the situation not only in the depths of the enemy’s defense, but in fact on its front line

[dmi.pris1]

If only so, I am no longer surprised at anything in this strange operation .. For a long time they puffed out their cheeks, but I had to pump my muscles ..

[chingachguc]

It doesn't say anything. Tracking the movement of individual machines is extremely difficult. It is even more difficult to establish the transfer of information in real time so that it gets where it is needed and on time.

[Bingo]

It’s useless ... It’s stupid to prove to a person that the launcher was developed specifically for mobile - specifically to work in the face of enemy opposition, then if you still don’t understand, you will never understand

[svp67]

Quote from Bingo

It is foolish to prove to a person that the launcher was developed specifically for mobile - precisely to work in conditions of enemy opposition,

This is a launcher developed in the 80s of the 20th century, and if after 50 years we do not have the ability to counteract them, then something is clearly wrong. Moreover, there are no secrets on these launchers for us.
Where are our Lancets? Where are the Grads and aviation?
And I'm already glad that with the assistance of the "gorbi" the Oka and Pioneer missile systems were destroyed

[Bingo]

Quote: svp67

This is a PU developed in the 80s of the 20th century

Air defense was developed a century ago, but in Yugoslavia it was not possible to suppress it with complete air superiority - what next? Confrontation of the shield and the sword. An episodic launch is possible, but that's another matter. that the launcher will be spotted exactly, and the closer it is to the front line, the less likely it is to escape. But no one will give a 100% defeat of installations designed just for the model of use in conditions of opposition. It's kind of weird to explain it.

The rule of law in the country is determined not by the presence of thieves, but by the ability of the authorities to neutralize them!

Shot down? So what else do you need?

[svp67]

Quote from Bingo

and in Yugoslavia it was not possible to suppress it with complete air superiority - what next?

Yes, of course .... then the Yugoslavs raised their "paws to the top", but of course they did not defeat them ... Yes, US aviation solved all the problems, without involving the Ground Forces.

Quote from Bingo

An episodic launch is possible, but that's another matter. that the launcher will be spotted exactly, and the closer it is to the front line, the less likely it is to escape.

These installations, and there were SIX missile launches, worked almost from the trenches, otherwise they would not have reached Berdyansk, the range would not have allowed ... So what? Where is at least one destroyed launcher?

Quote from Bingo

Shot down? So what else do you need?

It is necessary that these launchers remain there FOREVER. And they left. Now our former "brothers in arms" will give away more missiles from their arsenals and the launches will continue

[Johnson Smithson]

This is a launcher developed in the 80s of the 20th century, and if after 50 years we do not have the ability to counteract them, then something is clearly wrong.

what difference does it make when it was developed? the Tochku-U launcher is just a car, there isn’t even a radar,
she arrived, released and after 5 minutes she was no longer there

[svp67]

Quote from Johnson Smithson

she arrived, released and after 5 minutes she was no longer there

5 minutes of being near LBS SHOULD be the last for them. And they left

[nickname7]

svp67
PU development of the 80s of the 20th century, and if after 50 years we do not have the ability to counteract them,

Try to reread the article 3 times, the possibilities are excellent, point Y is intercepted.

[Darkness]

I thought the Ukrainians had already run out of them

[Grits]

Quote from Mraka

I thought the Ukrainians had already run out of them

I'm worried about something else - but we haven't run out of them. A bunch of Dot-Us are still stored in warehouses. For what? Why are they kept? Tanks, for example, even the T-55s have already been used, and for some reason they ignore the Points. It is clear that their accuracy is not ice, but it would be very nice to hit strong points with cluster warheads. Even if it explodes nearby, it will also not seem enough.

[Mavrikiy]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

Where did "Point U" come from over Berdyansk with its flight range of a little more than a hundred miles? Or do we not know something?

But we know for sure that we need to focus on the destruction of carriers.

The remaining missiles intercepted by anti-aircraft systems were British Storm Shadow. At least, all the latest strikes on the rear areas were carried out with these missiles.

[Arkady007]

It is necessary to focus on management in the General Staff and the actions of the Defense Ministry itself.
For more than a year, NWO has been going on, but they did not show their asses near the LBS and did not sniff what they live in the trenches.

[unhappy]

Last year, it was the "Point" with a cluster warhead that hit our large landing ships, one drowned (self-flooded) after a fire, another one or two received hits and urgently left for an external raid. You do not know, it was a high-profile event?

[Kuroneko]

Well, you have to. These freaks still have a couple of dozen Points left in their stash. And apparently, just cassette, purely for terror.

[chingachguc]

So it stayed. Or scraped up somewhere. Or bought. However, it is strange that we do not use Points. With a little modernization - the installation of a GLONASS unit - this missile can become a high-precision

[coinsam]

Well, respect to our air defense! The main thing is that in the production of tanks and shells they should not forget about TORs and Shells, about ammunition and for them, about radars and electronic warfare stations, because they also suffer losses, so timely measurement is needed - such that the enemy would not imagine , which can punch holes in the Russian system of defense against shelling.

[thrush68]

The Defense Ministry in full force with all hangers-on and generals to Belgorod and distribute it in an even layer along the border. The issue of shelling will be resolved very quickly.

[igorbrsv]

Well, then we are together. Otherwise, who will they command

[Grits]

Quote: thrush68

The Defense Ministry in full force with all hangers-on and generals to Belgorod and distribute it in an even layer along the border. The issue of shelling will be resolved very quickly

Good idea. I think if all the generals from Moscow, along with their wives and mistresses, were resettled to the border without the right to leave, then we would very quickly become witnesses of our offensive, the withdrawal of troops near Kharkov itself. And miraculously, a 50-kilometer security zone from artillery would be created

[Thrifty]

And why don't we use "Points"? We must have hundreds of them in storage. A minimum of modernization and hit them at crossings, places where equipment and manpower accumulate.

[Alexander Ultramarine]

To complete the saw cut so quickly? Think about it, everything is going according to plan

[Architect]

Maybe they are just modernizing them now?
As well as planning bombs, without unnecessary noise and deferambs.

[Pavel57]

Usually Storm launches with Su-24 pairs. And then there was the Point. 6th Storm did not descend?

[Roman Efremov]

For a long time it was not heard about the Points (massively, in any case), it seems that they have already ended - did the Ukrainians keep part of their own, or did someone throw them in?

[Kuroneko]

Quote: chingachguc

So it stayed. Or scraped up somewhere. Or bought. However, it is strange that we do not use Points. With a little modernization - the installation of a GLONASS unit - this missile can become a high-precision

We don't have points for a long time. They disposed of it (or are next in line, because they are very old and rotten - with dill we still partially extended the terms, with ours - no .. Instead of them, the Iskanders.