Chinese envoy: Beijing will not engage in actions aimed at adding fuel to the fire of the Ukrainian conflict

China's Special Representative for Eurasian Affairs Li Hui on Friday criticized an article published by the Wall Street Journal, calling it not only completely contrary to the facts, but also aimed at undermining Sino-Ukrainian relations.

The American edition of the Wall Street Journal previously published an article about the Chinese peace plan for Ukraine, which claims that this plan implies the need to recognize new Russian territories that were previously part of Ukraine. In particular, it said that Li's trip to Europe with Beijing's peace plan was a signal that "US allies in Europe should call for an immediate ceasefire, leaving Russia the territories it occupies."

Responding to the WSJ post, Lee noted:

China maintains an objective and impartial position on the crisis in Ukraine, actively advocating peace and dialogue. China's position on this issue has been widely understood and supported by the international community, including Russia and Ukraine.

At the same time, Lee made it clear that no substantive agreements could be reached. At least for now.

The Chinese envoy stressed that Beijing is not a party directly involved in the crisis and will not engage in actions that add fuel to the fire.

Speaking at a press conference, Li also said that China is ready to once again actively consider sending representatives to relevant countries to promote dialogue to resolve the Ukrainian crisis.

Comments

[Leshak]

The Chinese envoy emphasized <...> Beijing will not engage in actions that add fuel to the fire.

Well, thanks for that. At least don't interfere.

[Ilya-spb]

I just thought, and after all, "freezing" the conflict will bring collapse to Ukraine. Now the Bandera regime is based only on military rhetoric. As soon as a truce begins, Ukraine will collapse. The economy has collapsed. There is no work. There is no bread. The housing and communal services are destroyed. Hunger. Cold. Diseases. Discontent. Revolution!

[lisikat2]

Maybe you're right. If, to compare the situation in Ukraine and many European countries,,, after WWI, the situation is very bad.
From history, I remember: the radicals win, but which ones? Probably, those who are known in society and who are the leaders?

[Sergey Dvornikov]

The Soviet Union - survived and after 15 years was the first to go into space! And what have you Putinites done in 20 years - they have converted all the factories into markets - that they have now reached the purchase of radios and drones from China and Iran! Why don't you directly sabotage the army and the country?

[Ghost1]

Your words are a repetition of similar forecasts after 2014, it will fall apart, freeze and go., is about to happen soon. Enough of these predictions and expectations.

[donavi49]

Is not a fact. It is likely that the West will invest like Korea/Germany. By the way, exactly what they did not do at the time. How much would it cost to create a showcase from Lugansk and Donetsk in 8 years? Then people from Russian-speaking regions would be much more loyal, seeing an example with better conditions.

Few people want to live in the DPR and LPR in the state in which they were marinated for 8 years (well, people actively fled from there, as soon as it became possible to obtain Russian citizenship even before the SVO).

[Sergey Dvornikov]

A Chinese fellow sells everything that he produces to both yours and ours! This is truly a patriotic nation!

[donavi49]

By the way, today Reznikov is on an Asian tour with Li Shangfu (the head of the Chinese Defense Ministry, who was recently at the highest level in Moscow).

[Dekimen]

One might think that Moscow does not do the same. The oligarchs do not care who buys oil, gas, metals, etc. The APU is fueled by Russian oil and the tanks are made from Russian steel. Money doesn't smell.

[point]

Well, if Comrade Li thought that the Americans would calmly watch how China was active in a peaceful spirit on their experimental site, then this would not happen - they would throw in tar as soon as they could.
And all because the comrade was not going to deliver any achievements, except to demonstrate activity and clarify positions in Europe on this matter. Naturally, this is a weak posture that is easy to criticize. And rightly so.
It is hard to put on the hegemon's costume against the background of discrediting the very idea of ​​leadership. And they have no other idea of ​​​​promotion due to the fact of earthliness and lack of experience in intrigues on other people's sites. You can’t copy it from your own history, in which everything has already been, everything is so dear ...