Leopold II and the "Free State of the Congo": how the Belgian king staged genocide in a country in which he had never been

48
Leopold II and the "Free State of the Congo": how the Belgian king staged genocide in a country in which he had never been
Leopold II


Among the dictators of Africa, involved in massacres, atrocities and genocides, a special place is occupied not by an African at all, but by King Leopold II of Belgium. Judging by the number of murders, he will easily give odds to Bokassa, Amin and Taylor combined. How did the king of a small European country manage to become the organizer of one of the largest genocides in Africa, we will tell in this article.



Limited Monarch


Leopold II became King of Belgium in 1865 at the age of 30. He inherited a country with a constitutional form of government, literally every action he had to coordinate with the parliament. One day, Leopold tried to become a more independent ruler, but ran into tough opposition from parliament, which did not allow him to change the Constitution in his own interests.

Having not received unlimited power in Belgium, Leopold began to think how to acquire it in some other part of the globe. Then the thought came to him that Belgium needed colonies. France, Great Britain, Spain and Portugal have had colonies all over the world for several centuries. Belgium, which emerged as a state only in 1830, seemed to be forever behind them in this matter.

Leopold turned to the Spanish government with a request to sell the Philippines to him, but the Spaniards raised such a price that the idea had to be abandoned soon after.

At that time, and the 1870s were already in the yard, there was an active colonization of Africa. Europeans still have not reached the Congo located in Central Africa. A number of factors prevented colonization in the past: impenetrable jungle, tropical diseases, and a seeming lack of direct economic benefits.


Caricature of Leopold the "dealer king" in Vanity Fair, 1869

In 1876, Leopold founded the "International African Society", which officially was supposed to deal with humanitarian issues, but in practice it was under the guise of this organization that the colonization of the Congo began.

In the late 1870s, the African traveler and explorer Henry Stanley and a number of other confidants of Leopold entered into more than 400 agreements with the Congolese leaders, according to which their land became the property of Leopold in exchange for fabrics and other trinkets. So, thanks to the local corrupt elite, in less than 10 years, Leopold managed to subdue a vast territory, which was 76 times larger than Belgium.

"Congo Free State"


Initially, Leopold's actions provoked protests from Great Britain, which itself had views of these lands, but since the British colonized other countries at that time, they could not prevent Leopold. In 1885, the Berlin International Conference, which met specifically to divide the spheres of influence in Africa, recognized Leopold's rights to the Congo. In the same year, the occupied lands became officially known as the "Congo Free State" (FFS). Since for the Congolese themselves from that moment on freedom is a thing of the past, this name will soon begin to be perceived with irony.


Size comparison of Belgium and Congo

It is important to note that the Congo did not become a colony of Belgium, but in fact the personal possession of Leopold himself as a private individual. Therefore, there could be no question of either the operation of Belgian laws, or any interference in the affairs of the Congo by the Belgian parliament. Here Leopold became not just an unlimited monarch, but a complete master.

At first, Leopold engaged in the extraction of ivory, but the income was insignificant. And when the prices for rubber increased significantly in the world, it was decided to focus on its production.

The authorities of the Congo appointed by Leopold issued laws according to which all local residents had to pay taxes by labor service, working for free. At the same time, so that no one in Europe would have objections, Leopold banned the publication of all decrees relating to internal politics in the Congo.

So Africans were actually turned into slaves and forced to work on rubber plantations. The work was done by everyone from children to the elderly. At the same time, slavery did not officially exist in the Congo Free State. For example, unlike the classic slave or serf, the Congolese could not be sold or donated. But on the other hand, it was possible to kill, maim, rape, make them work to the point of complete exhaustion.

The gendarmerie "Public Forces" (Force Publique) was created to control plantation workers. In fact, it was Leopold's private army. Ordinary soldiers were recruited either from the local population or from Arabs or West Africans. The officers were Europeans. "Public forces" became overseers and punishers, raided the villages and killed those who refused to work. To force men to work, women were often taken hostage.

Each cartridge was counted by the soldiers, therefore, as proof that they were used for their intended purpose, and not sold to local hunters, the punishers had to provide the hands of the dead. But often brushes were cut off from living people as punishments for not fulfilling the work plan.


Rubber plantation workers in the Congo

In atrocities, not only Belgian officers showed zeal, but also local ordinary soldiers, who now felt their power in relation to their disenfranchised compatriots and the opportunity to settle old scores. In addition to this, the disenfranchised plantation workers actually supported the "Public Forces".


Soldiers of the "Public Forces". As you can see, for two white officers there are about two dozen black privates.

Eyewitness accounts


Of course, the story of the abuses and atrocities of the SGK administration appointed by Leopold would be incomplete without mentioning the testimonies of eyewitnesses - those who saw everything with their own eyes. Among these eyewitnesses were different people: officers who did not want to participate in atrocities, travelers, officials, missionaries, writers and many others.

Charles Lemaire described the day-to-day functions of the Forces Public as follows:

“During my stay in the Congo, I was the High Commissioner of the Equatorial District. When it came to rubber, I immediately wrote to the government: "If you want to collect rubber in the district, then you have to cut off your hands, noses and ears."

June 14, 1891. Raid on the village of Lolivu, whose inhabitants refused to come to the stronghold. Disgusting weather, torrents of rain. A large group of villages, could not destroy everything. 15 blacks killed.

June 14, 1891 at 5 am sent a Zanzibarian Mechoudy with 40 soldiers to burn Nkole. The operation was successful.

On July 13, 1892, Lieutenant Sarazain conducted a raid on the village of Bompopo. 20 natives killed, 13 women and children captured.


Belgians in the Congo

Officer Louis Leclerc described a similar picture of what was happening:

“June 21, 1895, arrival in Yambisi at 10.20. Several groups of soldiers were sent to clear the area. A few hours later they returned with 11 heads and 9 prisoners. The ship, which was sent in pursuit on June 22, delivered several more heads. The next day, three detainees and three heads were delivered. The soldiers shot dead a man who was looking for his wife and child. We burned down the village."

The British traveler Ewart Grogan wrote in 1899 about the northeastern regions of the Congo, which bordered on British possessions:

“When I briefly explored the area, I saw skeletons, skeletons everywhere. The way they lay spoke of the atrocities committed here.”

In 1899, the writer Joseph Conrad published the story "The Heart of Darkness", describing many of the crimes in it, after which the European press first drew attention to this problem. In 1902, under pressure from Great Britain, Leopold II was forced to send a commission to the country. Here are excerpts from the testimonies of the Congolese, which were collected by this commission:

“Child:“ We all ran into the forest - me, mom, grandmother and sister. The soldiers killed a lot of ours. Suddenly they noticed my mother's head in the bushes and ran up to us, grabbed my mother, grandmother, sister and one strange child, smaller than us. Everyone wanted to marry my mother and argued among themselves, and in the end they decided to kill her. They shot her in the stomach, she fell, and I cried so terribly when I saw it - now I had neither a mother nor a grandmother, I was left alone. They were killed in front of me."

A native girl reports: “On the way, the soldiers noticed the child and went towards him with the intention of killing him; the child laughed, then the soldier swung and hit him with the butt, and then cut off his head. The next day they killed my half-sister, cut off her head, arms and legs, on which there were bracelets. Then they caught my other sister and sold her to the woo tribe. Now she has become a slave."


Slave in the Congo

A significant contribution to the fact that the situation in the Congo became public property was made by the British writer, publicist, activist, pacifist and opponent of colonialism Edmund Morel. He founded the Congo Reform Society, criticized Leopold and his subordinates in his newspaper, and in 1906 published the book Red Rubber. She caused a wave of indignation at Leopold's actions both in Europe and in Belgium itself, and became one of the main reasons why the king was eventually forced to give up his rights to the Congo.


Edmund Morel

A few years later, another British writer, Arthur Conan Doyle, became interested in the topic of atrocities in the Congo. In 1909 he published Crimes in the Congo, in which he wrote:

“Eyewitness letters from the Congo, last dated September 27, testify that forced labor, kidnapping, transportation of slaves in chains, and burning of villages continue to this day and have become commonplace.”

"Queen of the Congo"


As you might guess, all the juices were squeezed out of the Congolese on the plantations by such methods. Official figures also speak about this. Rubber production rose from 30 tons in 1887 to 5900 tons in 1903. Thanks to this, King Leopold became one of the richest people in Europe.

He spent huge sums on the maintenance of his French mistress Blanche Delacroix (also known as Carolina Lacroix). They met when he was already 65 years old, and she was 16. The young French woman at that time worked as a prostitute in Paris, was able to demonstrate great skill in her "craft", and she was introduced to the king. So they became lovers. There was already freedom of speech in Belgium at that time, so one of the newspapers wrote caustically about this connection:

"The Belgian king no longer descends to prostitution, like his colleagues, in wild outbursts of sensuality and lust: prostitution itself crawls towards the king."


Postcard with Leopold and Caroline

After the death in 1902 of Leopold's wife, Karolina became his concubine. The king bought her numerous villas and mansions, including those on the Cote d'Azur in France, bought jewelry, and gave large amounts of cash. Gave her the title of Baroness Vaughan. In the press, Carolina was nicknamed the "Queen of the Congo", because everyone knew perfectly well the origin of this money.


Caricature mocking Leopold's relationship with Caroline. The priest exclaims: “Oh, sire! At your age!”, and Leopold replies: “Try the same!”

Five days before his death in 1909, they entered into an official marriage, but the Belgian Parliament declared it invalid. Subsequently, Carolina Lacroix lived a long life. Leopold's heirs tried to take away all the royal gifts from her, but to no avail.

Carolina had so much money that 40 years was not enough to spend it all. When she died in 1948, her son and Leopold inherited the fortune.

The fate of the Congo


After the publication in the press of numerous eyewitness accounts and Morel's book, Leopold was forced under pressure to give up the Congo as his private property. In November 1908, a few months before his death, he sold this country to the state of Belgium. Now the "Free State of the Congo" was simply called the "Belgian Congo" and turned into an ordinary colony. In all his life, the king himself never visited the Congo, managing it remotely with the help of proxies and only reaping the fruits of the work of millions of disenfranchised Congolese.

Before the sale, Leopold destroyed all the documents that compromised him.

The exact figures for Congo's losses during Leopold's reign are still unknown. Various sources cited figures from 3 to 15 million people. It is impossible to calculate them exactly for a number of reasons. These are the documents destroyed by Leopold, and the fact that in a number of cases no one simply counted the dead. Many Congolese died from starvation and epidemics, many from injuries and unbearable working conditions. Leopold and his subordinates in the field did not consider it necessary to build hospitals, therefore, in the absence of medicine, even a minor illness could become fatal.

It is believed, again according to very approximate data, that the total population of the Congo from 1884 to 1915 decreased from 30 to 15 million people.

Congo was then a Belgian colony for 52 years until it gained independence in 1960. Its capital, the current Kinshasa, was called Leopoldville until 1966. Like the vast majority of other African countries, the Congo was unable to use this freedom for peaceful construction and raising the standard of living. Civil wars broke out in the country. And as a result of civil wars at the turn of the millennium, about 6 million Congolese died.

Today's Congo is one of the poorest and most backward countries in the world. The rich resources of the country, which did not benefit it, are under the control of foreign corporations. And the population is infected with AIDS in large numbers.

Summing up all that has been said, I would like to pay special attention to the fact that such a large country, 76 times larger than Belgium, was conquered without major wars, not even by Belgium itself, but by its ruler. Undoubtedly, the betrayal of the elite, those local leaders who were ready to sacrifice the freedom of their wards for money or trinkets, played a big role in this. But it is impossible not to pay attention to the extreme weakness and passivity of the population itself. He was subjugated easily and relatively quickly, for more than two decades he was used as slaves without rights, killed and maimed, and during this time there was not a single major popular uprising! The genocide stopped thanks not to the resistance of the Congolese, but to the wide publicity in the media, which was made by caring citizens of other countries. Here the thought arises that if Leopold had not conquered the Congolese, then someone else would inevitably have done it.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    11 May 2023 04: 51
    Leopold loved women sooo much. No worse than a March cat. Only de Merode beat him off, a woman of true beauty
    1. +10
      11 May 2023 06: 16
      The king selected future passions mainly from young actresses - that is why he often attended ballet and opera in order to get acquainted with the girls he liked behind the scenes. In 1896, the dancer Cleopatra de Merode, who was 40 years younger, really turned his head. It got to the point that the monarch for the sake of Cleo was even ready to abdicate the throne, but it did not come to abdication. Attempts to woo the king were sharply rebuked by Cleo herself, whose reputation might have suffered. This nipped in the bud became the subject of ridicule in the royal houses of Europe, and hurt Leopold's image, bestowing on him the derisive nickname Cleopold.
    2. +11
      11 May 2023 06: 57
      Memoirs of Cleopatra Diana (Cleo) de Merode (1875-1966) - French dancer, star of La Belle Époque.

      A few photos of Cleopatra Diana de Merode




      Cleo de Merode is considered the founder of duet parts (male-female) in classical Russian ballet. In 1896, the authoritative magazine "L' Illustration" chose her as the beauty queen of 130 modern beauties of Europe.
      1. +7
        11 May 2023 07: 09
        Fragments of Belle Epoque. Very cute at times.

        However, we have our own celebration of life. It's time to go to work.
        1. +9
          11 May 2023 17: 19
          Fragments of Belle Epoque. Very cute at times.


          Leopold appreciated this immediately. laughing



          Hello, Sergey! drinks
          1. +5
            11 May 2023 17: 37
            Hi Constantine!

            Many artists also appreciated. True, probably from a slightly greater distance than the king.
            1. +4
              11 May 2023 17: 58
              Well, for a real artist, imagination is enough.
              And the king, he is the king in Africa. wink
      2. +7
        11 May 2023 17: 01
        Yes, a woman of amazing beauty and not at all a typical "beauty" for that time.

  2. +12
    11 May 2023 05: 53
    and during this time there was not a single major popular uprising!
    The population of the Congo represents more than 200 ethnic groups and peoples, and in total there are 242 living spoken languages. Of these, four languages ​​have a "national" status, the official language for national communication is French. The leaders of the tribes "for a small share", sent their fellow tribesmen to work. Work brigades were formed from representatives of various tribes. But the "Public Forces" were formed, on a national basis, from representatives of the most warlike tribes. The usual colonial policy of "divide and rule", which manifested itself especially clearly in the Congo. The colonial authorities in the Congo did not particularly contribute to the spread of various religious denominations in the Congo, for they understood that this could contribute to the unification of various tribes on a religious basis.
    1. 0
      12 May 2023 15: 49
      Quote: parusnik
      represents more than 200 ethnic groups and peoples and in total there are 242 living

      It was just a shame for the Ukrainians! For 30 years they suffered garbage, inventing Russophobia. Or they could conquer the Congo and frolic there. After all, banning 242 languages ​​would be more fun than one Russian ;)
  3. +9
    11 May 2023 06: 47
    Sometimes I imagine how plantations change the face of the Earth. The conditional European has become life well-fed, vigorous and in comfort.

    And sometimes horns and legs remain from natural communities.
    1. +7
      11 May 2023 07: 45
      In any case, without mass agricultural activities, and these are plantations, human civilization is doomed.
      1. +6
        11 May 2023 07: 52
        Completely agree. There was an agricultural revolution. And some people stopped being hungry. But, as always, the following problems appeared.

        And one of them is the emergence of a human consumer.

        However, I am retelling this Aurelio Peccei.
    2. Fat
      +10
      11 May 2023 07: 55
      hi Greetings, Sergey. Copper, silver, uranium, diamonds were found in the Congo...
      In 1906, even under the "dominion" of Leopold, European industrialists rushed there. The Union Minière du Haut-Katanga (French; literally "Union of Miners of Upper Katanga") was formed, a Belgian mining company (with a minor British presence). Union Minere started with copper, then tin, cobalt, radium, uranium, zinc, cadmium, germanium, manganese, silver and gold. By the beginning of World War II.
      The "General Company of Belgium" (bank), through the "Union of Miners", controlled approximately 70% of the Congo's economy.
      The "Manhattan Project" took place on hand-enriched ore mined by "Union Miniere" in Katanga at the Shinkolobwe mine for the French nuclear project ...
      Not just rubber... request
      1. +5
        11 May 2023 08: 26
        Greetings, Andrew!

        Both on the ground and underground. Long arms will get everywhere.
  4. +9
    11 May 2023 08: 00
    Judging by the number of murders, he will easily give odds to Bokassa, Amin and Taylor combined.
    That is, African "cannibals", angels compared to a civilized European.
  5. +6
    11 May 2023 08: 15
    Good morning and afternoon everyone.
    So I want to say:
    Leopold, come out, you vile coward.
    It's from a cartoon if anyone doesn't know.
    I once read that in Belgium, back in the 50s and 60s of the 20th century, blacks were exhibited in the zoo for public viewing.
    If this is true, then I have no words.
    Only Leopold was not the only one. The British did not do this in their colonies. Yes, and other "carriers of enlightenment and freedom" did not differ much from them.
    1. +6
      11 May 2023 15: 52
      If this is true, then I have no words.

      This is true, and there were similar zoos in Europe and the USA even at the beginning of the XNUMXth century.


      In 1904, during the World Exhibition in St. Louis, an anthropological exposition was also opened, which was the same “human zoo”. Among its inhabitants was Ota Benga, a Congolese pygmy from the Mbuti people. Due to his height of 140 centimeters, visitors to the exhibition mistook him for a boy. In fact, at that time he was 23 years old.

      And that's without comment...
  6. +8
    11 May 2023 09: 43
    Very interesting story.

    I note that the main sources on the topic are the anti-Belgian propaganda of the British and French (as we know, the main fighters against colonialism at the beginning of the XNUMXth century), as well as the American one from the time of the current bout of "fight against racism".

    For example, quite often they recall a colorful quote given by the author.
    If you want to collect rubber in the district, then you have to cut off hands, noses and ears

    As a rule, it is not mentioned that the primary source thus justifies the refusal of a local official to deal with rubber in his state farm, so to speak.

    It was also interesting to learn about the moral character of the March cat Leopold. To spend on ballerinas the money stolen from the construction of the fleet, crossed out by trade, is an unheard of thing for people of his position and time.
    1. +10
      11 May 2023 11: 01
      Quote: Negro
      I note that the main sources on the topic are the anti-Belgian propaganda of the British and French (as we know, the main fighters against colonialism in the early twentieth century),

      It's different, you need to understand! © smile
      Oh yes, the French in the same French Indochina were so cute that, perhaps, only the Japanese managed to block them.
      Quote: Negro
      It was also interesting to learn about the moral character of the March cat Leopold. To spend on ballerinas the money stolen from the construction of the fleet, crossed out by trade, is an unheard of thing for people of his position and time.

      That's it! I would steal from the budget, like all normal people - no one would say a word. And he took it into his head to earn ... this is inappropriate for the monarch!
      1. 0
        13 May 2023 15: 20
        In French Indochina, the French seemed to behave more or less civilized.
    2. +3
      11 May 2023 12: 49
      I agree with you. By the way, the first schools in black Africa appeared in the Congo. Unlike the British and French colonies. And teaching in native languages. somehow it doesn't quite fit. What the Germans did in Namibia, probably few people will surpass ...
    3. Alf
      +2
      11 May 2023 20: 04
      Quote: Negro
      To spend on ballerinas the money stolen from the construction of the fleet, crossed out by trade, is an unheard of thing for people of his position and time.

      And who at the top of the Russian Empire used the little one?
  7. +3
    11 May 2023 09: 59
    After the publication in the press of numerous eyewitness accounts and Morel's book, Leopold was forced under pressure to give up the Congo as his private property. In November 1908, a few months before his death, he sold this country to the state of Belgium. Now the "Free State of the Congo" was simply called the "Belgian Congo" and turned into an ordinary colony.

    It's funny, the capitalist king, under the pressure of public opinion, which, as we know, does not exist, abandoned the super-profitable business, although, as we all know again, "there is no such crime that capital would not dare for 300 percent of the profit"
    Wrong some kind of capitalist, apparently did not read the classics of Marxism.
    1. +13
      11 May 2023 11: 28
      Quote: Engineer
      Wrong some kind of capitalist, apparently did not read the classics of Marxism.

      Denis, do you seriously think that the "king-capitalist" abandoned his, in fact, property solely under the pressure of "public opinion"? And "public opinion" was formed by itself in the field of concern for the fate of the blacks of the Congo?
      Initially, Leopold's actions provoked protests from Great Britain, which itself had views of these lands, but since the British colonized other countries at that time, they could not prevent Leopold.

      Further, we look at the article who formed this "public opinion"
      Charles Antoine Lemaire (French Charles Antoine Lemaire; November 1, 1800, Paris - July 22, 1871, Paris) - French botanist and writer
      Sir Roger David Casement (1864-1916), British diplomat
      Ewart Scott Grogan (1874-1967) English explorer, politician and entrepreneur.
      Joseph Conrad (1857 - 1924) was an English writer of Polish origin.
      Edmund Dene Morel (1873 - 1924) was a British journalist, essayist, peace activist and politician.
      Sir Arthur Ignaceus Conan Doyle (1859-1930) was an Irish-born English writer.
      I assure you, everything happened here in full accordance with the old Marx: in 1895, copper was discovered in the Congo, copper is money, big, just huge money, and when such money belongs to one person, the rest have a keen sense of injustice.
      So, I'm afraid, in this case (and not only in this one), "public opinion" is formed artificially and with very specific goals. "Crimes" excite the capitalist only if he does not benefit from these crimes.
      1. +4
        11 May 2023 12: 12
        I assure you, everything happened here in full accordance with the old Marx: in 1895, copper was discovered in the Congo, copper is money, big, just huge money, and when such money belongs to one person, the rest have a keen sense of injustice.

        I don't need to be convinced, it's enough to present the facts. And the facts say that the personal enterprise of the king was transformed into the Belgian Congo with a colonial administration.
        Keyword here Belgian .
        So, I'm afraid, in this case (and not only in this one), "public opinion" is formed artificially and with very specific goals.

        For what other purposes? What was the property of the King of Belgium became the property of the State of Belgium. Multi-move British diplomacy?
        1. +6
          11 May 2023 13: 53
          Quote: Engineer
          A multi-move of English diplomacy?

          Well, the British at that time were not alone in Europe.
          I just glanced at what happened in the Congo after this country officially became a Belgian colony.
          Mining in Katanga was carried out as early as the 10th century. Europeans began to develop the bowels of the Congo in the first decade of the 20th century. By the end of the colonial period, European companies controlled almost the entire mining industry.

          https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_colier/86/ДРК
          The companies that settled here during the period of the "Free State" continued to operate in the Congo. In addition to economic functions, they retained the functions of administrative control and coercion. The Compagnie du Congo pour le Commerce et l'Industrie (CCCI, headed by Albert Thies) founded Comite Special du Katanga (CSK) in 1900 to both exploit and manage the mineral-rich province of Katanga.
          The aforementioned CSK company granted permission for the extraction of non-ferrous metal to the British company Tanganyika Concessions (the latter is still working, or rather ruining Zambia). This company also began to mine in Katanga, in addition to copper, gold and silver. Since 1906, Union Miniere de Haut Katanga (UMHK), as a joint venture between the Congo Free State, CCCI and Tanganyika Concessions, has received a concession in Katanga for as much as 34 thousand square meters. km.
          Societe Internacional Forestiere et Miniere du Congo (Forminiere) - with a large participation of American capital - began to work in the Congo Free State, where it received a concession in the diamond-rich Kazai region (the first diamond was mined there in 1907). This company, CCCI and several other holdings created in 1928 the Societe Generale de Belgique (SGB) conglomerate, which controlled up to 70% of the Congo economy (it lasted until the 1990s, when it was absorbed by the French group Suez).
          https://cont.ws/@tyurin/289616
          Etc.
          Belgium is not a very important bird in Europe to get all the benefits from anything alone. Yes, besides, in this way they removed a competitor in the rubber market - this is also an important and necessary matter.
          And why did he hand it over to Belgium, and not to Britain? There were too many people who wanted to join the process. The same France could be offended. Transfer everything to one person - the rest will not understand.
          In short, there was no smell of any slobbering humanism here. Naked calculation
          1. +7
            11 May 2023 14: 05
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            And why did he hand it over to Belgium, and not to Britain?

            Good afternoon Mikhail,
            it was probably somewhat more difficult to "squeeze" the colony from the state of Belgium than just from the king as the supreme ruler, and secondly, this state of affairs could well suit the British themselves: now all affairs were transferred to the jurisdiction of state Belgian officials and then a little corruption and British concessions ( or Belgian-British) receive "maximum favored nation treatment" hi
            1. +4
              11 May 2023 14: 14
              Greetings, Sergey.
              Some issues are easier to resolve not in the military-political plane, but in the financial and economic one. Of course, Belgium itself was unable to quickly develop the available resources. It goes without saying that the Belgians will attract foreign capital. And here the question becomes already in a different plane, which, apparently, suited everyone.
              1. +5
                11 May 2023 14: 34
                hi Michael, and then, this is wildness smile when such a rich "pantry" belongs to one person, despite the fact that a person is mortal and, moreover, suddenly mortal, as one of the reasons and suddenly left without an owner? "Here, it is necessary, technically" (c). This is me about how the Congo became a Belgian colony. smile Simplified version. smile
          2. +3
            11 May 2023 14: 11
            I asked two simple questions.
            Why did the King of Belgium give up the most profitable business?
            What goals were pursued by the puppeteers of public opinion, even English, even French, whatever. ?
            I would like clear answers
            1. +4
              11 May 2023 14: 55
              Quote: Engineer
              Why did the King of Belgium give up the most profitable business?

              Because if he had not sold it, it would have been taken away. He could not hold him by force. Perhaps the age of the king himself and his entourage also played a role.
              Quote: Engineer
              What goals did the puppeteers of public opinion pursue?

              Go to the Congo. Which they successfully did in the end.
              1. +3
                11 May 2023 15: 12
                1. Who would take it away? This is despite the fact that the Entente is being formed in full swing if anything. And now Belgium is being pushed into the arms of Germany.
                2. Wait, is there any evidence that the king did not allow foreign capital into the Congo?
                And this is if you close your eyes to the fact that the same Tanganyika concessions entered the Union Miner du Hout Katanga in 1906, two years earlier than the formation of the Belgian Congo. as a minority shareholder, which they remained in the future.
                1. +5
                  11 May 2023 16: 32
                  It is necessary to look for and see what kind of finances poured into the Free Congo and into the Belgian. I'm lazy. smile
                  Of course, the infusion process did not begin in 1908. By the way, this is also the answer (one of) to your question who and how would take it away.
                  As far as Belgium and the Entente are concerned, the situation in the Congo of Belgium before 1908, it seems to me, is indifferent. Why should they care about this business if they don't have a stake in it?
                  Tell me, do you really seriously think that public opinion in the style of "negroes is a pity" was formed spontaneously by itself and that it was because of him that the king abandoned his "feudal" possession in Africa?
                  1. +2
                    11 May 2023 16: 49
                    I'm lazy

                    I didn't doubt for a second.
                    As far as Belgium and the Entente are concerned, the situation in the Congo of Belgium before 1908, it seems to me, is indifferent. Why should they care about this business if they don't have a stake in it?


                    What did i just read?
                    Here is the Belgian capital before 1908
                    Compagnie du Katanga
                    Union Minière du Haut-Katanga
                    English capital until 1906 is at least the same Tanganyika concession

                    There were no answers to my questions. Moreover, what prevented the king from allowing British (French, American) capital and continuing to hill the plot?

                    You see, history should be studied, not speculated.
                    And if there were prerequisites for the rejection of the Congo by the great powers, then this would inevitably be reflected in the negotiations, diplomatic notes, etc.

                    There is such an approach, it can be called kitchen Marxism:
                    "Yes, no, without options they would have been squeezed out, Doyle and Twain acted as torpedoes from serious boys."
                    When the deep establishment does this, this is quite expected, but when almost the main commentator in the History section argues in this spirit, then this takes aback.
                    1. Fat
                      +3
                      11 May 2023 18: 37
                      hi Hello Denis. The capital supporting first the free state of the Congo, then the Belgian Congo is the Banque d'Outremer.
                      It was founded on January 7, 1899 with the aim of
                      implementation of foreign investments and carrying out all types of banking operations.
                      The founding capital of 32 million Belgian francs was acquired
                      international consortium, which included Deutsche Bank, Sal. Oppenheim,
                      Societe Generale de Belge, Bank de Paris et des Pays-Bas and Baron Léon Lambert.
                      In 1928, the company became known as Société Générale.

                      Prior to this, in 1891, the "free state" managed to get ahead of Cecil Rhodes in "signing a treaty" with the kingdom of Eke (Katanga)
                    2. Alf
                      +4
                      11 May 2023 20: 07
                      Quote: Engineer
                      what prevented the king from allowing British (French, American) capital and continuing to hill the plot?

                      Didn't want to share. The business formula "If you don't give a part, we'll take it all" works great.
                    3. +2
                      11 May 2023 20: 19
                      Thank you for the "main" one, of course, but here you are exaggerating, in my humble opinion. Moreover, I never aspired to this status and I don’t feel any responsibility in this regard.
                      History needs to be studied, I agree. If I decided to write an article on this topic, my argumentation would have a slightly different level.
                      As for our discussion, your point of view is justified no better than mine.
                      Under public pressure, Nicholas II abdicated, there is a lot of evidence of this, both direct and indirect. Can you give something similar about poor Leopold? Who pressured him, how, when?
                      In the meantime, we have what we have: an aged king-dealer, aggressive capital, actively penetrating into the zone of his interests and, as a result, the sale of the business.
                      1. +1
                        11 May 2023 22: 18
                        In the meantime, we have what we have: the elderly businessman king, aggressive capital, actively penetrating into the zone of its interests and, as a result, the sale of the business.

                        I love Marxists.
                        Not a single confirmation has been presented, there has never been any argumentation, but the point of view is already being presented as an indisputable fact.

                        The campaign to denounce the king's policies began in the world press no later than 1890 and continued for more than 15 years. All this time, the Belgians and Leopold himself were read as a man who was strenuously building the image of the father of the nation as a greedy sadist. It would be nice to rinse inside the country, but this was done by the authors of world bestsellers such as Doyle and Twain. Moreover, pamphleteers constantly put the words Belgium and the Belgians next to the name of the king, creating a stable association. One can imagine how the respectable Flemish bourgeoisie bombed when the British, on whom there was nowhere to put brands, poked their fingers at them. And there was nothing to complain about. Well, pamphlets, as well as photographic exhibitions of women and children with severed hands, were held in the best houses in London and Paris.

                        The patience of the Belgian parliament ran out and under pressure from the socialists an international commission was set up to investigate the affairs in the Free State of the Congo.
                        The king publicly supported the undertaking, since the commission included people affiliated with his business and he counted on a favorable result. Nevertheless, the commission confirmed the presence of crimes, including the most odious ones.
                        Leopold was in a trap. It was possible to give a damn about everything and leave it as it is, but this meant strengthening the opposition in parliament, general ridicule and a complete loss of the image that he had built for decades. I had to shrug and get rid of the asset that had become toxic.

                        The transformation of the "Free State" into a colony, of course, did not abolish the exploitation of the Congolese, but at least stopped its most extreme manifestations.
                        At the same time, the position of Belgium itself in the Congo only strengthened. Instead of a fiction with an independent state, we got a full-fledged colony legitimized by the consent of other states

                        It would seem that the role of public opinion as a political lever is obvious. It is even more obvious that the businessman in the crown gave in, and did not bite his teeth for his business. But no. Now we have to recognize the public contribution, but what tomorrow? Can you also agree that democracy works at least sometimes? It is impossible for a Russian person to do this.
              2. +3
                11 May 2023 18: 02
                Go to the Congo. Which they successfully did in the end.




                Hi Michael! smile
                1. +5
                  11 May 2023 19: 22
                  Hello, Uncle Kostya.
                  I think the guys are going to a brothel. In the Congo, the road is to the right. laughing
                  1. +7
                    11 May 2023 20: 07
                    Judging by the dented car, they are going for vodka.
                    1. +6
                      11 May 2023 20: 38
                      Quote: 3x3zsave
                      Judging by the wrecked car

                      We've already gone for vodka. Now to the brothel, judging by the serious faces. smile
                      1. +4
                        11 May 2023 21: 06
                        We've already gone for vodka. Now to the brothel, judging by the serious faces.
                        Judging by the serious faces, obviously for the supplement.
                    2. +3
                      11 May 2023 23: 49
                      I repeat, if there is no car, then we went on a mission. Or for vodka.
                      We have a lot of vodka - so we went on a mission.
                      You were the only one in uniform. You don't have a form right now.
                      So you went on a mission.
                      But not for vodka. Because we have a lot of vodka.
                  2. +5
                    11 May 2023 20: 07
                    I think the boys are going to a brothel.


                    Well, people need some rest. request wink
    2. +5
      11 May 2023 11: 55
      Quote: Engineer
      apparently he did not read the classics of Marxism.

      Probably read Thomas Dunning.
      1. Fat
        +4
        11 May 2023 12: 56
        hi Greetings, Sergey
        Quote: Mihaylov
        Probably read Thomas Dunning.

        Maybe. But in general, why should Leopold II be interested in the articles of a British trade unionist and a book about "trades unions and strikes, their philosophy and intentions"?
        Water, as it is, is completely past his "professional interests" ...
        Another thing - "Capital" smile