Origins of World War II: USA vs. All

42
Origins of World War II: USA vs. All
On August 14, 1941, US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill met on board the British battleship Prince of Wales near Newfoundland in the Atlantic Ocean.


The origins of evil


During the First World War, London, Paris and Washington used the Russian Empire as "cannon fodder" in the fight against the German world (the German and Austro-Hungarian empires). Used as a "cash cow". And after the defeat of the Germans and Russians, they robbed, took out the main wealth. Russia was generally excluded from the Great Game and Stories, but the Bolsheviks were able to save her with their project of a new Russian (Soviet) civilization.



That is, the Anglo-Saxons could not complete the big war with the total destruction of Russian civilization and the Russian superethnos. Therefore, the origins of the Second World War lie in the First. London and Washington again organize a world carnage, give Germany a quick rise using the Hitler project (Made in Europe - Adolf Hitler; Who nurtured Nazism in Germany). Give the Third Reich almost all of Europe.

Soviet Russia, led by the wise Stalin, did the impossible: got out of the civilizational and state catastrophe of 1917-1920; with a titanic spurt and incredible efforts, she was able to prepare for a new big war, create a new industrial economy and armed forces; form a single patriotic society; eliminate the main forces of the "fifth column" before the start of the enemy invasion. This made it possible to survive, survive the catastrophe of the Second World War and even become stronger. Get out of the storm with a superpower. Quickly restore the economy destroyed in the west of the country.

But the price was terrible: the bloody massacre bled the Germans and Russians. The global enemy dealt a heavy blow to our demographics, the reproduction of the people. The flower of the nation died, young people who were already building a new society of service, knowledge and creation. It is possible that it was precisely this war that did not allow Stalin to complete his great project and did not allow Soviet civilization to move to a new level of development. That is, the enemy could not crush us, but stopped Russia's breakthrough into the future, to the stars. Yes, there was the first satellite, Gagarin and many more victories, but it was already inertia.

Who benefits?


It is officially believed that in World War II the USSR, in alliance with the United States and England, fought against Germany, Italy and Japan. But this is a superficial, formal view. In fact, the game was much more difficult.

In reality in this world war USA fought against the whole world. Even against the British Empire, to weaken it and make it a junior partner in the Anglo-Saxon tandem and gain access to its colonies and dominions. The Americans pitted their enemies and allies, as England did in many wars before, provoking them to take advantageous steps. For example, in the USA a whole myth about Pearl Harbor has been created. Like, we slept peacefully, and the treacherous Japanese attacked. In fact The United States entered the war on its own terms and when it suited them. At first, Washington supported the aggression of the Japanese Empire in China and against Russia, solving its own strategic tasks and receiving a considerable gesheft. Then the Japanese were provoked by cutting off their supply of "black gold". Japan had to either capitulate in about six months, when the reserves were exhausted, or go to war. The samurai made their choice. Washington knew that the Japanese were attacking, and made a "sacred sacrifice" - part fleet with aging battleships (aircraft carriers took them away in a timely manner). The American public, which did not want to get involved in the European war, was furious and mobilized.

The United States has officially become a victim of Japanese aggression. The strategic provocation was a success. As a result of the war, the Americans robbed Japan, gained control of its sphere of influence in the Asia-Pacific region (except for China, where the Yankees were able to get only Taiwan under their wing). The United States received strategic footholds - "land aircraft carriers" - in Japan and South Korea. They were directed against the Russians and the Chinese, and so far the situation has not changed much.

The results of World War II were excellent for the United States. The German world was finished off, plundered, and Germany, in essence, is still a semi-colony of the United States. So, Berlin could not do anything to stop the massacre of 2022-2023. in Ukraine, the destruction of the Nord Streams. Although the Ukrainian campaign destroys the EU, led by Germany and France, undermines their economy, the Americans again have all the benefits. And the Europeans, led by the Germans, are paying for this American "holiday".

Also, as a result of World War II, the Empire of Japan was robbed and brought under control. The British Empire rolled downhill, American businessmen entered its sphere of influence. Soviet civilization suffered terrible damage. The dollar soon became the global currency, sweeping away all competitors. This allowed the United States to control half the world, and after the collapse of the USSR, the entire planet. The main product of America was a green paper, the whole world gave real resources for it, including intellectual ones.

The crisis of capitalism


Both during the First and during the Second World War, the main prerequisite for the great war was the crisis of capitalism. It is based on constant expansion, development of new spaces, territories, human and material resources. As early as 1929, the United States was hit by an economic crisis of unprecedented severity and depth. The Great Depression, which claimed, according to various estimates, from 10 to 15 million people. A real internal war. Hunger, mass unemployment, suicide, confrontation between the mafia organized by bankers and ordinary people, a surge in banditry, etc.

Which exit? Or A big game of inciting a world war to burn the accumulated contradictions, eliminate and rob competitors, master their territory and sphere of influence. Make the dollar the world's currency. Create a new world order on American terms. Either the internal crisis will become a prerequisite for a new terrible civil war, causing the collapse of American society, the political and social system. Naturally, the owners of Washington did not even think that it was possible to create, following the example of the USSR, a more just, people-oriented system and society, without dividing people into the elect and the losers, the rich and the poor. So, during the crisis, goods and food were burned and drowned, ordinary Americans did not have money to buy them. And at this time, thousands of people died or fell ill from malnutrition, hunger. In many thousands of families, children took turns eating: one child today, another child tomorrow.

Roosevelt, who personified the American elite in this period, chose an imperialist, global war. Washington made a bet on a big war already in the early 1930s, when Germany was in a fever and the Nazis, led by Hitler, had not yet come to power.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    9 May 2023 04: 27
    Green paper has become America's main commodity.
    And blinded many eyes!
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +6
      9 May 2023 05: 36
      Well, then open our eyes to us ... Perhaps, in some particulars, I do not agree with the author, but in general it is written correctly ..
      1. -5
        9 May 2023 06: 21
        Quote: Jackson
        Well, so you open our eyes

        If you cannot master so few letters, then at least look at the pictures ...
      2. +2
        10 May 2023 13: 55
        It is a pity that they did not write about how Russia ruined the USSR without any outside help. Which, being controlled by normal rulers, would give odds to the United States. But, as was customary during tsarist Russia, life is like in a chicken coop and it works - peck your neighbor and shit on the bottom. And they found work for the poor, both with their pants and with their minds, they staged a war. And how does this differ from the war that the Nazis unleashed, for one thing, the Germans were smart, and these were idiots. Again, the US rules the ball.
    2. AMG
      0
      9 May 2023 06: 52
      If there is nothing specific to say, you need to roll your eyes up and say something philosophical. To cover your emptiness. Why did you have to get out at all?
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  3. -9
    9 May 2023 05: 35
    Regarding the pre-war liquidation of the fifth column. Together with the fifth column, the entire command staff of the Red Army also suffered. The child was thrown out with the water. We often underestimate or admire Lend-Lease from the United States too much. The USSR will not defeat Germany, they cannot cope with Japan. And so it happened. After the war, the Americans were primarily concerned about the high organizational ability of the Communists. This is precisely what their activities were aimed at. Using the slackness in the Soviet party bodies, there was a polite offer to abandon everything Soviet, which was accepted with enthusiasm by us. BUT this seemed not enough to the USA, they needed to separate the peoples of Yugoslavia and the USSR. Since 1945, everything has gone according to plan. But as they say, God will not betray, the pig will not eat. We will live.
    1. +13
      9 May 2023 06: 29
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      Together with the fifth column, the entire command staff of the Red Army suffered.

      The command staff did not suffer, these are all fables of liberal traitors. There is a certificate on the number of dismissed commanding officers and political staff for 1935-1939. March 24-25, 1940, exactly dismissed, and not shot, this is a big difference. And in general, officers, then, what is now in the army in abundance. Before WWII, in the Wehrmacht, according to staffing standards, there were 29 soldiers and non-commissioned officers per officer, in French - 22, in Japanese - 19. And only in the Red Army was it supposed to have one officer (political worker) for 6 soldiers and sergeants! Deal as an officer corps. Only during the Second World War, a high-quality officer corps appeared in the USSR, which went through the war and understood the nature of that war.
      1. 0
        9 May 2023 11: 33
        However, treacherous liberals may object that the numbers themselves mean nothing. And that the few officers you think were fired were of the highest quality. hi
    2. +11
      9 May 2023 11: 55
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      Together with the fifth column, the entire command staff of the Red Army suffered.

      It seems to be 2023 in the yard, not 1993. Why repeat perestroika tales?
  4. +8
    9 May 2023 06: 13
    Happy Holiday !!!

    But the presentation is so superficial that the style is so simplified that it is suitable for the middle classes of a comprehensive school, but for VO it is not clear how the editors missed it.
    1. +1
      9 May 2023 06: 33
      Indeed, extremely superficially, the author, in fact, clung to one fact of the redistribution of the world, and did not develop it at all. And there you can say a lot of things, and poorly known, for example, in Russia. For example, I was pleased how they proved to me with foam at the mouth that German products have always been famous for their quality, even references to sources did not help, that before WWI, German was synonymous with the "Chinese" 90s, that is, complete garbage in terms of quality, you can google , as on the Singer sewing machines, the Germans put the brand made in Germany at the bottom of the foot machine from the bottom - the seamstresses simply did not turn the machine upside down so that they could find this brand, and so they passed them off as American Singers))) And that’s it, asphalting German quality in propaganda - the Germans are not let into the market, here is the reason for WWI, and not a colony even once. WWII is a consequence of WWII, it’s also clear here, the author didn’t even scratch himself
      Well and so on
    2. AMG
      -2
      9 May 2023 06: 58
      This is to make it easy to understand. More than enough has been said on this topic, but it turns out that not everyone gets it.
    3. +9
      9 May 2023 08: 02
      Happy Day of the Great Victory of our people in the Great Patriotic War!
      1. Fat
        +4
        9 May 2023 09: 28
        hi Greetings Dmitry. I join and congratulate all colleagues (and you)

        This postcard was issued for the 20th anniversary of the Great Victory, in 1965, when May 9 again became a public holiday...

        And this postcard is post-war.
      2. 0
        18 May 2023 17: 06
        Happy Victory Day of the Great Soviet people in World War II. The victory of the USSR has nothing to do with the current tsarist country.
    4. 0
      9 May 2023 09: 45
      Quote from Fangaro
      But the presentation is so superficial that the style is so simplified that it is suitable for the middle classes of a comprehensive school, but for VO it is not clear how the editors missed it.

      An amazing opinion ... Try to justify it somehow with at least one example from this even very short article, it would be very interesting for me to hear constructive criticism and not get by with general, little really meaningful phrases.
  5. 0
    9 May 2023 08: 25
    I am not a historian or a politician, and therefore the question arose: why, when the Germans reached Moscow, did the United States not join them? After all, they could have ended the war in 41-42.
    1. 0
      9 May 2023 16: 31
      Quote: Million
      I am not a historian or a politician, and therefore the question arose: why, when the Germans reached Moscow, did the United States not join them?
      Why didn't you join them? Take an interest in the American army in 1941. In addition, the Germans took Moscow, gained access to resources, now they cannot be taken by a naval blockade. They have released huge forces from the eastern front. Aviation is re-profiled from front-line to strategic, instead of tanks there are submarines. England will fall in 1942. What and how to do with them next?
    2. 0
      15 October 2023 19: 47
      Our sworn allies made money on both sides. The nomenclature of supplies to both the USSR and Germany was the same. This is the best business. Hans and Russians kill each other, America makes money. And Hitler was leaked as waste material.
      Both in WWII and WWII, the beneficiaries were the United States.
  6. +5
    9 May 2023 08: 40
    Really, even on such a day, it was impossible to find an author who would write a sane article corresponding to the event, and not this cryptohistorical delirium?
    1. +1
      9 May 2023 09: 28
      Especially for those who have attached themselves, I’ll add a minus - the content of the Military Review website on Victory Day is not even surprising - amazement. It's not at all positive though.
  7. +2
    9 May 2023 11: 17
    All the evil in this world comes from one country - from the striped ones. They are everywhere, like a matrix from a famous movie. If you do not obey, then you are defeated by death. The most terrible thing about this is that when they realize that they are losing their leadership, and this is already happening, they can kill themselves and us all in the fire of a nuclear war.
  8. +1
    9 May 2023 11: 26
    As a literary genre, Ukronia is not bad. I must say that in this article the author fits perfectly into the genre. laughing
    1. Fat
      +2
      9 May 2023 12: 05
      hi
      Quote: Decimalegio
      As a literary genre, Ukronia is not bad. I must say that in this article the author fits perfectly into the genre

      Leave. The author with an enviable frequency tells about the various "missed opportunities" of various leaders, countries, peoples, etc.
      1. +1
        9 May 2023 12: 17
        The author is very brave. In 6 thousand characters, put the analysis of the world crisis that began at the beginning of the century (and the second world war is a continuation of the first) and ended in 1945 with a new world order. Consider the origins of the crisis, the driving forces, the balance of interests in a changing situation and end it with capacious conclusions.
        Readers should evaluate the material, whether it really succeeded.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      9 May 2023 17: 55
      Such a cryptohistorical delirium can be spewed out either due to the deepest ignorance, or deliberately, with the aim of finally decomposing the atrophying thinking apparatus of an audience not inclined to reflection, poisoned by aggressive propaganda.
      What is most surprising is that the administration of the site ignored the date of May 9th, getting off with an opus of a pervert from history.
      There is a firm conviction that "the administration's opinion corresponds to the official one."

      Plus you for the "cryptohistorical delirium." laughing
      I'll steal the term, with your permission.
  10. +4
    9 May 2023 13: 20
    During the First World War, London, Paris and Washington used the Russian Empire as "cannon fodder" in the fight against the German world (the German and Austro-Hungarian empires).


    Strictly speaking, the financial oligarchs were the puppeteers, who used everyone, including England, which the WWI also weakened (like France).
    The very ones behind the Bank of England and the newly created Fed.
    It can equally be argued that Germany was used to fight the "Russian world".
    It is logical - if there are several competitors, you need to pit them against each other.
    What Germany and Russia had in common was not only that they were monarchies. Both in Germany and in Russia, the issue of the national currency (monetary machine) was in the hands of the state. Unlike England, France and the USA. A situation intolerable for the financial oligarchy. But one world war was not enough, even two were not enough. But after the defeat of the USSR, even our country found itself in financial bondage, from which we still have not got out, although there is progress.
    1. +1
      9 May 2023 16: 18
      Back in Soviet times, when I helped one author write a historical study on the use of chemical weapons in World War II, I was faced with the fact that the official history, let's say (to put it mildly) .... negative
  11. +5
    9 May 2023 13: 56
    Regarding the pre-war liquidation of the fifth column. Together with the fifth column, the entire command staff of the Red Army suffered.


    So it's all. By the way, why did he suffer? For domestic expansion?
    The quality of the command staff was not high enough (which was clearly shown by the conflicts with Japan and Finland), so purges had to be arranged.
    And the fact that there was not enough qualified command staff was not the result of purges, but growing pains. After the adoption of the law on universal conscription (well, in general, Stalin did not prepare for war, since he insisted on the adoption of such a law), the number of the USSR Armed Forces increased significantly in three years. They simply did not have time to prepare the commanders, these are not privates, who had enough KMB.
  12. +4
    9 May 2023 14: 02
    Quote from Bingo
    And that's it, asphalting the German quality in propaganda - the Germans were not allowed into the market, here's the reason for WWI, and not a colony even once.


    The Germans were stupidly bred and provoked. The reason for WWII, like WWII, is in the actions of those who received the most gesheft on these combinations.
    Look for who benefits - a proven principle.
    By the way, the British defended their colonies from the penetration of not only German capital. And when Churchill began to ask Roosevelt for help at the beginning of WWII, what did Roosevelt demand as a condition for its provision? That's right, the openness of the British colonies to foreign (that is, American) capital. Since then, the Yankees in all these Canadian-Australian hosts like at home. Even local currencies began to be called "dollars".
    1. +1
      9 May 2023 18: 31
      The Germans were stupidly bred and provoked. The reason for WWII, like WWII, is in the actions of those who received the most gesheft on these combinations.
      Look for who benefits - a proven principle.

      It remains to understand who divorced. Who found, organized and sponsored Princip, Ilich, Dimitrievich, Gachinovich, Golubich, etc. and so on. wink
  13. +3
    9 May 2023 20: 16
    Quote from the author (Samsonov): "Naturally, the owners of Washington did not even think that it was possible to create, following the example of the USSR, a more just, people-oriented system and society, without dividing people into the elect and the losers, the rich and the poor." Of course, the owners of Washington did not think - but ours - the drunk EBN with accomplices and their successors only think about a more just, people-oriented system and society, without dividing people into the elect and losers, rich and poor! They think, they try - but it does not work out in any way - apparently, the owners of Washington are in the way!
  14. +1
    9 May 2023 20: 24
    Only in US wars and can exist:
    White House Meeting:
    - We must do something with our enormous debt ...
    - And let's cancel the dollar, introduce something else!
    - No, let's just give up all debts and send all nafig!
    “Gentlemen, well, we cannot do that.” We are gentlemen, highly decent people, faithful to high moral principles, word and honor. Let’s better stir up the third world war!

    Looks like they've already screwed up?
  15. +2
    10 May 2023 08: 36
    Quote: Arzt
    It remains to understand who divorced. Who found, organized and sponsored Princip, Ilich, Dimitrievich, Gachinovich, Golubich, etc. and so on.


    Who divorced is generally clear. Lord bankers, with whom many revolutionaries had very warm relations (Trotsky, in particular).
    The Rothschilds and Rockefellers are specifically in business.
    Well, as for the performers, who specifically brought in the money ... there was such a Parvus, he was in charge of grants.

    A revolution is a financially costly undertaking, there is no need for illusions that this is all only on enthusiasm and voluntary principles. Even the storming of the Bastille, at one time, was not without third-party funding. While the French were engaged in their revolutions and changes, some people quietly took away the colonies from France.
  16. Eug
    0
    10 May 2023 11: 23
    The children's analogue of the struggle for world domination is the game "King of the Hill", where the most dangerous is the one who got closest to the king. So the United States proceeded from this logic, entering into open and unspoken alliances with those countries that were most useful at a particular time in specific theaters of military operations ..
  17. 0
    10 May 2023 18: 24
    Citizen Samsonov, where do you come up with such nonsense?
    During the First World War, London, Paris and Washington used the Russian Empire as "cannon fodder" in the fight against the German world (German and Austro-Hungarian empires)

    the French and the British themselves did not fight at all, were their victims in WWI minimal even against the background? Was the "German world" forced to unleash WWI? Did the Kaiser's troops almost take Paris because they were forced to enter the war, unprepared and unmobilized?
    the Anglo-Saxons could not end the big war with the total destruction of Russian civilization and the Russian superethnos

    what is the basis for such plans? Was the war itself unleashed without the participation of the Russian authorities? Or did Tsar Nicholas II by his actions not make an effort to unleash a war?
    Soviet Russia, led by the wise Stalin, did the impossible: she got out of the civilizational and state catastrophe of 1917-1920.

    What is the state and, especially, civilizational catastrophe of 1917-1920? If this means the Great October Socialist Revolution, then how can one separate "Wise Stalin" from it, whose entire activity and rule is a direct continuation of October?
    It is possible that it was precisely this war that did not allow Stalin to complete his great project and did not allow Soviet civilization to move to a new level of development. That is, the enemy could not crush us, but stopped Russia's breakthrough into the future

    those. Did the miscalculations of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Soviet authorities in the 50-80s have nothing to do with the collapse of the USSR? Kosygin's reforms, the policy of non-removal of the highest republican and regional committees of the party and directors of enterprises and the growth of corruption in this regard - is this a consequence of the war or post-war decisions?
    What does Stalin and Soviet civilization and Russia's breakthrough into the future have to do with it? Why not a breakthrough of Kazakhstan, Belarus or Ukraine? The USSR is really Russia, and not 15 Soviet republics?
    It is officially believed that in World War II the USSR, in alliance with the United States and England, fought against Germany, Italy and Japan.

    but are there any other options? where is the US war with the USSR or the US with Great Britain?
    Washington knew that the Japanese were attacking, and made a "sacred sacrifice" - part of the fleet with aging battleships (aircraft carriers were taken away in a timely manner).

    Again, what documents confirm that "in Washington they knew" that "the aircraft carriers were taken away in a timely manner"?
    Berlin could do nothing to stop the 2022-2023 carnage. in Ukraine

    Did Berlin at least somehow show that it was going to stop the massacre in Ukraine on Putin's terms, or maybe Berlin has leverage on the Kremlin authorities? It was clear even before the NWO that Putin would not be able to dictate his terms, while Germany would support Ukraine. And it was clear that Russia would be among the losers even in the event of its quick victory, it would simply be crushed economically. Therefore, it is strange that the leadership of the Russian Federation got involved in an adventure without the possibility of winning. And as it turned out that even the Russian Federation could not win in a couple of weeks or months and its power was greatly exaggerated, then military assistance went to Ukraine.

    The article is a set of delusional fabrications of the author and clichés that came out from the pen of all sorts of Dugins and old people, which do not have any justification or evidence for those given. And why write such nonsense, one asks, do they hold readers for idiots?
    1. 0
      18 May 2023 15: 44
      Quote: andybuts
      the French and the British themselves did not fight at all, were their victims in WWI minimal even against the background? Was the "German world" forced to unleash WWI? Did the Kaiser's troops almost take Paris because they were forced to enter the war, unprepared and unmobilized?

      This is not an argument at all, as history shows, they don’t give a damn about their peoples from a big heap ... But you forgot about the Second World War ... how many losses the impudent Saxons had there, and how many we have in the USSR and Germany ... remind?! am

      The impudent Saxons made a good conclusion for themselves and the 1st MV !!!

      Quote: andybuts
      The article is a set of delusional fabrications of the author and clichés that came out from the pen of all sorts of Dugins and old people, which do not have any justification or evidence for those given. And why write such nonsense, one asks, do they hold readers for idiots?

      Your post can also be called a delusional fabrication ...

      shl
      You are a loser and do not know the principle "who benefits from it ..."
  18. -1
    11 May 2023 13: 20
    Quote: andybuts
    what is the basis for such plans? Was the war itself unleashed without the participation of the Russian authorities? Or did Tsar Nicholas II by his actions not make an effort to unleash a war?


    We'll have to intercede a little for the author, in some ways he is still right.

    After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War, Russia found itself in the position of a junior partner in relation to Western democracies, moreover, it was heavily dependent on foreign capital. As for Nikolai, he was dependent on his environment (which "pushed" him over time), so I would not overestimate the subjectivity of power in the Republic of Ingushetia. Of course, one of the goals of those who unleashed this conflict was the weakening (possibly liquidation) of the Russian state. Nothing personal, just a policy to eliminate competitors.

    Quote: andybuts
    are there other options? where is the US war with the USSR or the US with Great Britain?


    Yes there. Wars can also be waged indirectly, by proxy. So yes. World War II is both the US war against England and the US war against the USSR. You can also remember France, in fact - she also lost to the United States. By the hands of Germany and partly Japan.
    Germany, having lost, significantly weakened both England and the USSR, thereby allowing the United States to establish control over Europe. Hitler is the "icebreaker" of the American elite. But since Hitler could go too far and pose a threat even to those who fed him, the "red cruiser" (USSR) was also prepared in advance, capable of sinking this "icebreaker" when the time came.
    From the point of view of the Yankees, the Cold War is a logical continuation of the Second World War. Quite logically, the continuation of the combination to turn the United States into a world hegemon.

    Quote: andybuts
    And it was clear that Russia would be among the losers even in the event of its quick victory, it would simply be crushed economically


    They won't crush. And the Russian Federation, according to the results, will win. The West is already laying straws, morally preparing for the coming defeat. Hence the "leaks" about Ukraine's unpreparedness for a counteroffensive, its inability to achieve victory.
    In conflicts of this kind, it is not the one who is stronger who wins, but the one who is more enduring. This is us.
    1. 0
      18 May 2023 15: 48
      Quote: Illanatol
      We'll have to intercede a little for the author, in some ways he is still right.

      Then why is he wrong? - Preferably with arguments!
    2. 0
      18 May 2023 22: 38
      Germany after WWI was fostered by Britain, not the United States. The United States then politically withdrew from Europe. Yes, they invested in Germany, but it was "just a business" - they also invested in Britain and France. Ford opened a factory in Germany (which later supplied the Wehrmacht with cars throughout the war), but at the same time Ford factories were opened in Britain and France. But Britain was politically encouraging German revanchism long before the arrival of Hitler. Before the ink had dried on the Versailles Treaty, the British unleashed a dirty information war against France. Incredible stories about a million German women raped by the French in the Rhineland first appeared in the British press, and only then in the German one. Thanks to massive British propaganda, the opinion about the monstrous injustice of Versailles and the "justification" of German revanchism became generally accepted in Europe already in the 20s (here, alas, ours, from a near mind, blew the same tune with the British). All this was done by the British as part of the opposition to the imaginary "French hegemony" on the continent long before Hitler.
  19. 0
    27 July 2023 19: 04
    Everything was so good and so excellent that everything stolen in Russia was hidden and continues to be hidden in the USA. Now, regardless of the war between the US and Russia, the US is still a better friend for the thieves of Russia than the Russian people, whom the rulers of Russia allowed and even made the main killing meat for the war with the West. Let us sort of secretly there, but they are robbing the Russians, as in the ancient legend that at least the money is made from the shit of the Russians, but in the USA, it does not stink. The more Russians are slammed, the safer it will be for those who make money corpses out of Russians.
  20. 0
    28 December 2023 22: 03
    Quote: Unknown
    Deal as an officer corps. Only during the Second World War, a high-quality officer corps appeared in the USSR, which went through the war and understood the nature of that war.


    Where does he come from? There are almost no royal ones left. The civil war is not an indicator. Spain, Khalkhin Gol - here, our own, and all the testing grounds for testing something more or less modern. And that’s a stretch