The law on foreign agents: put the appropriate marker and continue destructive activities further

Recently, the word "foreign agent" quite often "flashes" in the tapes News. Today this “title” has been awarded to many people who just yesterday were idols of youth, and not only.

Moreover, some well-known journalists, as well as bloggers who “broadcast” to a huge audience, also acquired the status of a foreign agent in Russia. Why is this dangerous for our country?

To begin with, it is worth understanding the wording. So, in simple terms, a foreign agent in Russia is a legal or natural person, regardless of his citizenship, whose activities are financed from abroad and consist in collecting and transmitting information of a military-technical nature, as well as disseminating information that is harmful to the state , materials and information among an unlimited number of persons.

Tellingly, the West often nurtures such “assistants” on its territory, providing grants for free education in its universities, and then “throws” it back to Russia to carry out the aforementioned destructive activities.

It should be noted that the collection and transmission of information of a military-technical nature could be attributed to treason. In general, it is so.

Meanwhile, the punishment provided for by the law on foreign agents does not at all correspond to the crime. So, if a person has received the appropriate status, then he has the right to continue to engage in his activities, if it is not related to work in government, participation in public procurement and educational work among young people under 16 years of age.

And yes. In the materials that the foreign agent has the right to publish further, he must indicate his status. That's a "fair" punishment. It turns out that, by and large, the destructive work against Russia continues, only the foreign agent puts the appropriate marker. How correct is this from the point of view of state, national security?

Comments

[NKXXI]

Nevertheless, a year ago I was not mistaken when I saw a clear similarity between the current situation in Russia and the situation at the beginning of the XNUMXth century. (Russo-Japanese War, WWI). The same spy mania, the same war of attrition, the same waging war in the interests of the oligarchs and top officials, the same feast during the plague of the bourgeoisie in the rear, the same rear areas ruined and unprepared for war, and the same murky justification for the war itself. There are no Bolsheviks. And it can be tragic...

[Ohsetin]

Anything above - 100%

Quote from NKXXI

There are no Bolsheviks. And it can be tragic...

But here I'm not sure, although it is necessary to understand. Perhaps without the Bolsheviks (and the great blood of the Civil War and Stalinist repressions), the Republic of Ingushetia would eventually slide into Papuasia. But, not a fact, it could well become part of the Third Reich and the conditional Aryan Empire. The subjunctive mood is difficult to apply to history.

[rocket757]

Moreover, some well-known journalists, as well as bloggers who “broadcast” to a huge audience, also acquired the status of a foreign agent in Russia. Why is this dangerous for our country?

. What are the options for dealing with destructive influences???
It seems like not one, but in fact and in fact, only life itself in our society, the very state of society, the spirit, mood, morality of society can resist all this.
But these are common truths that they cannot or do not want to follow!?!?!?
So someone needs it, there is no other conclusion.

[Kostyar]

Enemies in the government want a popular uprising....

[Commissar Kitten]

On the contrary, they do not crave, but fear, and that is exactly why they did not shut up their opponents in the only real way today - by blocking YouTube (which does not comply with the decisions of the Russian authorities, but this does not interfere with the broadcasting of accusers of foreign agents). However, "rebellion" is said loudly here, they are not afraid of a riot, but a drop in the rating before the 2024 elections, which will extend the status quo for another 6 years until 2030 (and then it will be possible to act more boldly).

[Ohsetin]

Quote: Bone

Enemies in the government want a popular uprising....

No, the authorities are doing everything that he would eventually be. The tighter the lid is tightened, the stronger the explosion.

[Bingo]

The point is. that if you tighten the screws to a crunch, then the country will turn into a barracks. Which is good only in war, but not in peacetime. This is quite enough - it is clearly marked that the opinion of this source is the point of view of an agent of influence of a foreign state.
Otherwise, according to the logic of the author, it should be left as in the Second World War - broadcasting only from the outlet of one government channel.
In short, the proposal is akin to the transition of the Russian economy to a military footing. At the same time, the country's economy is being destroyed, and this is precisely what the West is frantically trying to achieve. With akhtung on censorship, society is being destroyed, moving to a military footing, to a barracks position. Less pleasant for the West than the collapse of the economy. but also not bad, both sentences are from the category of teach a fool to pray to God

[begemot20091]

should be hung publicly in the square. immediately blow up and stop writing

[Ohsetin]

Quote: begemot20091

should be hung publicly in the square.

Maybe start with the liberators of the Azov people, the grain-dealers, regroupers in Kharkovskaya, heavy-lifters in Kherson?

Quote: begemot20091

immediately blow up and stop writing

And it will be difficult to blow up and there is nothing to write about?

[Ohsetin]

Quote from Bingo

In short, the proposal is akin to the transition of the Russian economy to a military footing.

But not really. On a military footing, this is when "Everything for the front, everything for victory." And then, as it were, leave the income of the oligarchs (the article does not say anything about the seizure of property for military production) and shut their mouths, those who at least somehow disagree with the party line (to maintain power and enrich themselves).

[1 z1]

Now the status of a foreign agent for the foreign agents themselves looks like insurance for all cases. It will get really bad here, they will run to the west, waving the status like a flag. A comfortable environment will be restored for them in Russia, they are packing on their knees, like "sorry, the demon beguiled, otherwise we are patriots."

[your1970]

Quote: 1z1

Now the status of a foreign agent for the foreign agents themselves looks like insurance for all cases. It will get really bad here, they will run to the west, waving the status like a flag. A comfortable environment will be restored for them in Russia, they are packing on their knees, like "sorry, the demon beguiled, otherwise we are patriots."

I'm not sure - but according to my technology, the cancellation of "foreign agency" is not provided.
So it's not so simple with "the devil" ....

[1 z1]

Quote: your1970

technology to cancel "foreign agency"

Practice shows that with a great desire of high people, technologies and laws covering them are developed and adopted within a day

[Igor_Bozhko]

Such forces have always been in Russia and at all times. Dostoevsky wrote about this... In Russia, true unexampled heroism goes side by side with vile and somehow animal betrayal. Sometimes I wonder why? And I can’t find any other explanation than that Russia is a unique, original and self-sufficient civilization that does not oppose itself to the world and does not strive for autocracy, but by its very existence does not allow others to do this. We have a lot of enemies, both external and internal. We are hated. And we do not like them and have long been accustomed to this.

[NKXXI]

Yes... Hard case. Judging the XNUMXst century according to the patterns of the monarchical XIX century. And to judge by those provisions that even in the XIX century. did not evoke absolute support in society. However, it is not surprising from a fan of pseudoscientific disciplines and an opportunistic understanding of the history of Russia ...

[Igor_Bozhko]

))) And what provisions and in what society caused absolute support? Where was it and when? Sometimes it is better for you to remain silent, a lover of absolutes.

[NKXXI]

Archaic and not corresponding to the era - they did not cause in almost any society. It’s not for a supporter of pseudoscientific disciplines to argue the opposite ...

[paul3390]

Well, what is the other option? In our age of the Internet - you can’t block information, one hell will leak out. And so - they will act legally, only with a mark on their foreheads. At least people can see who they're dealing with. Our people are not stupid for the most part, they will figure out who is who.

[Knell wardenheart]

Our people are not stupid for the most part, they will figure out who is who.

Another postulate from the hosts of chimeric beliefs that are not clear on what they are based on.
It will sound insulting, but our people for the most part are just very, very stupid. He loves flattery, populism, primitive and predictable models of behavioral reactions, simple, I would even say primitive approaches to solving complex things that predictably almost never work. However, nothing changes from this, which only confirms this sad truth.
These people voted for EBN in 1996 - and it doesn’t matter that some% was rigged, most of the country voted for a person who had already shown all his charms by that time.
These people voted for DAM, time after time some part of them voted for GAZ and Zhirik, even when they no longer even tried to pretend to be the opposition.
These people were given a ride on privatization, these people allowed to bury the third economy of the planet and a huge empire (twice, sic!) cops and criminals, disgustingly empty dramas - and it is these people who eat it and never get enough of it. It is under this gigantic layer that such an aesthetically approaching character as Mr. Soloviev tries, plays on their strings of souls, so to speak. It would be possible to continue this spisochiks for a long time, but I don’t see the point in excessive savoring. No, most of our population is by no means smart, these people do not know how to think and prefer not to understand. This is very sad, and partly for this reason we have been so hellishly sausage for the last hundred years and more.

[Maks1995]

All this is empty, by and large.
Here Yakunin's children are still sailing on NATO yachts. Inogens? No.
Here is the Son of Medvedev secretly lived in Omerik. Inogens? No.
Here the media happily report on record sales of resources in the EU. (hence, both in NATO and in the Armed Forces of Ukraine). Inogens? No.
Here are the next Oligarchs suing each other in London. Inogens? No.

And who are the aliens? Yes, some sixes slip.
No billions of dollars, no property over the hill and in Russia, no yachts in NATO, no government, no own parties, no ties with the authorities of Russia and NATO. (while even the Presidents of the countries stand up for the money and property of individual Oligarchs)

Broke the law - and the thief should be in jail. He didn’t violate it - so why moan that someone doesn’t walk in formation and doesn’t nod at the TV?
"You should not dare to have your own judgment" - they warned about this 200 years ago ...

[Ohsetin]

Again, who is the author of this order?

To begin with, it is worth understanding the wording.

And let's look at the wording "discrediting the Armed Forces" and compare it with the grounds in those issued under Art. 20.3.3 sentences.?

Meanwhile, the punishment provided for by the law on foreign agents does not at all correspond to the crime.

Why did I ask about the author? There is a lack of basic knowledge. THIS IS NOT A PUNISHMENT! This is a status! The penalty is a fine or a term under 20.3.3

It turns out that, by and large, the destructive work against Russia continues

It turns out that we have formallythere is still freedom of speech. It can be canceled, but then the status of a dictatorship will be officially added to the status of a country sponsoring terrorism.

To what extent is this correct from the point of view of the state, national security?

Well, let's impute treason to them all, business, there is already a precedent. And it doesn’t matter if there are grounds for this, but waves will not go through the swamp.

[tank64rus]

Is it really incomprehensible that foreign agents are just a "roof" for real agents of the special services. A tool for intelligence and coup d'état. Influence on the "elite" of the state through foreign accounts, the study of offspring allegedly in "prestigious" universities, villas, etc. you etc. In America, the "law on foreigners" is very strict, and in other countries, even when they try to somehow toughen it up, the same Americans raise a wild howl. Georgia example.

[dump22]

a foreign agent in Russia is a legal or natural person, regardless of his citizenship, whose activities are financed from abroad

Funding is not required.
From July 14, 2022, in order to assign the status of "foreign agent", it is enough to indicate "foreign influence", without any foreign funding.