Carlson flew away, has not yet promised to return

29
Carlson flew away, has not yet promised to return

A few days have passed since the dismissal of the most popular TV presenter on American television, Tucker Carlson. Fired quickly, without official explanation. And what? Did the “democratic public” of the West get indignant, did they protest against the anti-democratic arbitrariness of the Democratic Party? Of course not. We talked quietly (in the kitchens and behind the scenes), quietly leaked.

But what about freedom of speech? But what about equal rights, the inviolability of the media? How to deal with it?



But no way. Absolutely, no way. Because all these cries about freedom of the press, about democracy and publicity are fiction. All this America loves when it is not about America itself. All this goes up on a pedestal, unless it concerns a political system that, for the sake of self-preservation, is ready to drag an 80-year-old stumbling and confused in facts and historical the old man's estimates for a second term.

Did it deal a blow to the reputation of Tucker Carlson himself? No. Has it dealt a blow to the reputation of the United States in the world? And Washington, in its current frenzy, doesn't give a damn about that. And is it even possible to cause damage to something that, by and large, is long gone. All words about the American "reputation" disappeared long before the story with this TV presenter - even when the American elites began to allow themselves not to fulfill the agreements and agreements that they themselves entered into.

So, Carlson flew away, did not promise to return. Bye. Although he is destined for a great future as the head of his own media, unless, of course, some black maid testifies against him.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 30 2023 18: 53
    Take it to Rush Today, you won’t lose one hundred percent!
    1. +6
      April 30 2023 18: 57
      Carlson's salary is the same as Rush Today's budget!
      1. 0
        1 May 2023 11: 44
        Was. And now he's like in the cartoon "Once upon a time there was a dog" - Now like me
    2. 0
      April 30 2023 20: 06
      Simonyan seems to have already invited him
  2. 0
    April 30 2023 18: 57
    unless, of course, some dark-skinned maid testifies against him.

    AND ALREADY... His ex-colleague accuses him of calling her in conversations with some "yummy" (Yummy) ... And he used the frivolous expression "pussy" (Cunt) in relation to her bully
    He is owed a lot under the canceled contract, but they hint that he will lose this money as a result of courts with "harassment" ... They want to undress, but not in bed!
    1. +1
      April 30 2023 19: 02
      You speak correctly! Now they won’t get off of it, democracy, it’s so ...... wassat
    2. +3
      April 30 2023 19: 15
      That's not even surprised at all!
      Note - all objectionables are brought down according to the same scenario - "old sins" in the form of harassment. They dig up mothballs and begin to unwind "facts" that have almost lost their relevance ... The manual is the same. A primitive approach .... Why didn’t they start stabbing Tucker for racism and gender intolerance? He also had reports on the subject. Everything is different - at least some variety ....
      And so it seems that all objectionable as one are fuckers-interceptors ... laughing Somewhat primitive and one-sided ...
      1. 0
        April 30 2023 20: 15
        Tucker Carlson will be sued for racist rape by a disabled blue negro transgender.
        So sure.
        1. 0
          1 May 2023 18: 32
          That's how it works!
          Trump is accused by an adult male film actress (not, as this word sounds in LGBT) of rape. And what, the Democrats say "Atu!"
          Well, the main feature: can you imagine what will happen if an artillery carriage arrives at the inauguration of the victorious democracy?
  3. -1
    April 30 2023 19: 07
    Today at 5-34 there was already an article about this Carlson. At 18-50 another one. Until 23-59 there is still time. Waiting for a note about "our boy"
  4. -1
    April 30 2023 19: 13
    He is even predicted to be a presidential candidate in the distant future.
  5. -7
    April 30 2023 19: 14
    that's when the nightingale droppings burst live - that will be the topic for the note. and so ... another bulk burned out, but did not sit down. cracker.
  6. -1
    April 30 2023 19: 32
    Well, we already have Snowden, we can accept him: although he would look good in a team with Trump ...
  7. 0
    April 30 2023 20: 00
    Why is our, as always, impotent Russian Foreign Ministry choking on a bone, silent, when the tyrannical power of these united British colonies tramples on freedom of speech and the first amendment to the Constitution???

    Where is the summons of the US Ambassador in Moscow to the carpet at the Russian Foreign Ministry and handing him a note of protest with an ultimatum to reinstate Tucker Carlson?

    Why are Russian representatives in the UN silent, who are obliged to convene an extraordinary meeting of the UN Security Council and stigmatize the criminal American regime that takes away freedom of speech from US citizens?

    Where are the demonstrations of workers in Moscow on May 1 with slogans: "Freedom of speech for Tucker Carlson!"
    1. +1
      April 30 2023 20: 04
      Well, Tucker Carlson is not Angela Davis at all ....
      1. +2
        April 30 2023 20: 16
        And the Russian Federation is not the USSR at all.
        ___________________
    2. +1
      1 May 2023 18: 37
      Why organize it? You paint a poster and go out. Why should someone organize actions (this word is a direct translation from the American action)? Do you prefer to sit on the couch and watch it all on TV?
  8. +1
    April 30 2023 20: 05
    A professional of this level will not be left without a job.
    Good luck to him, let him continue to cut the truth-womb.
    1. -2
      April 30 2023 20: 54
      “Commentators with a smile give out today what no one said under torture yesterday. At the same time, where necessary, they will lubricate and lick, otherwise they would have been removed from their high salary in five minutes.” That's the whole "courage" of Carlson - "to bark and growl" at whom the owner will show and within the limits of what is permitted by him. A close analogue - "telekiller in red boots" - Sergey Dorenko. His words were enough to turn the fyariera of high officials into dust, he was invulnerable and fearless. But, as soon as he began to "bark at the wrong tree", he flew out in hypersound from everywhere. Now, according to the latest news about him, the host of one of the German radio stations. So there's really no need to believe in the "courage" of journalists. I do not mean the personal courage of those who work in hot spots, in war. It's not about them and not about this courage.
  9. 0
    April 30 2023 20: 08
    What's so anti-democratic about Tucker leaving Fox News?
    In addition to the fact that for us and our country his rubric was often support, or something.
    Yes, his evening editions stuck pins in the asses of American politicians.
    Yes, sometimes his issues were "for Russia". Almost always "For all the good against all the bad."
    A good primetime journalist and host stirs up the embers of readers' and viewers' emotions with his poker. Its' his job. What he believes in, whom he sympathizes with - it does not matter while he is at work. This is about whether he is for us or not for us. He is for himself.
    Why is Fox News now without Tucker? Don't know. Perhaps there is a fatter company where his eccentric evening opinions will bring more money to this unknown company and to him personally.
    Don't assume that Russia had an ally at Fox News. Perhaps it was a companion. Or maybe a random companion.
    All of Russia's allies live in Russia. Not everyone who lives in Russia is Russia's allies.
    Unfortunately.
    1. +1
      April 30 2023 20: 34
      Which of the Amer journalists is our ally? He was simply, in the language of the 90s, an "infantryman" in intra-American showdowns. Russia's allies have long been known - its army and navy. All the rest, at best, useful, albeit not for long, "fellow travelers." What people, what countries. Their interests partially coincide with ours for a while, that's all.
      1. 0
        1 May 2023 18: 52
        No, Anna! Every American is first and foremost an American! He believes in the Constitution and believes that his opinion is valuable in itself. Collecting such grandmas in prime time is not khukhr-muhr.
        And now about Tucker's pro-Russian speeches. What upholds the values ​​of the family - is that pro-Russian? Is the fact that he protects the US budget from being plundered by embezzlers of the form of independent assistance - pro-Russian?
        He's just an American and wants to live by his own rules. He is far from giving a damn about both Ukraine and Russia. He hasn't even realized yet that the rules of the game have changed!
    2. -1
      April 30 2023 21: 03
      He is not for himself, but for the interests of the employer. By and large, he is the same hired worker as, say, a janitor. Who is he for? For the tenants of the house, where is his plot, for himself, for Uganda and Honduras? No, for the Criminal Code, which pays him a salary. To the same extent that the janitor is an "ally" of the tenants, the journalist is our "ally".
  10. -3
    April 30 2023 20: 25
    Solovyov got fed up with something, don't you think? Let's take Carlson in his place. First with an interpreter, then he will learn Russian. If only our authorities did not begin to "rinse" like Amer's.
    1. 0
      1 May 2023 18: 56
      Do you think that in our power structures there is no one to rinse?
  11. 0
    April 30 2023 23: 32
    With the kind of money he got, he could fly for a long time! As the American press wrote, he has millions of dollars in his account, houses, factories, steamships, shops and other little things, so he is an elite person and is well off!
  12. 0
    1 May 2023 05: 54
    Carlson is controversial. Flesh from the flesh is a liberal columnist. He divides people by skin color, but does not talk about US gender policy. His "leaving" can be used by the Republican Party. Which is also not far from the Democrats. Such is the capitalist world. He loves to be stroked and cherished. But if someone bucks, then he will not do well.
    1. 0
      1 May 2023 18: 59
      You probably haven't watched his performances. From just a supporter of the traditional family
  13. 0
    1 May 2023 18: 30
    Several days have passed since the dismissal of the most popular TV presenter on American television, Tucker Carlson, and Solovyov still does not have him. Not in order!