Nikolai Konstantinovich Romanov. Graduate of the Academy of the General Staff, researcher of Asia, businessman, madman and kleptomaniac

86
Nikolai Konstantinovich Romanov. Graduate of the Academy of the General Staff, researcher of Asia, businessman, madman and kleptomaniac
Nikolai Konstantinovich Romanov with his family (top right)


В previous article it was told about the youth of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich Romanov - the grandson of Nicholas I and the elder brother of the famous poet, who signed the initials K.R.



Today we will continue the story about Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich, talk about his "treatment", extravagances, three wives, and successful business activities. And also about his granddaughter, Natalya Androsova, a motorcycle racer and participant in the Great Patriotic War, who in the second half of the XNUMXth century was very famous in the artistic and literary environment of Moscow, having been awarded the unofficial title of “Queen of the Arbat”.

"Treatment" of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich


As we remember, for stealing three diamonds from the salary of the icon, which his parents were blessed for marriage, Nikolai Konstantinovich was declared mentally ill and expelled from St. Petersburg forever. His name was now forbidden to be mentioned in official documents relating to the imperial family, and was deleted from the lists of the Horse Life Guards Regiment. He also lost titles, awards and inheritance rights.

Doctors recommended “to place His Highness in the southern climate of Russia” and engage him in agricultural activities - “beekeeping, sericulture, cattle breeding”, etc. In total, during his “treatment”, this Grand Duke changed 10 places of residence.

At first he was sent to Orenburg, he was accompanied by Lieutenant General Vitkovsky and doctor Timofeevsky. Here, in the winter of either 1877, or already 1878, he secretly married the 17-year-old daughter of the Orenburg police chief, Nadezhda Alexandrovna Dreyer, in the church of the Kazan Icon of the Mother of God in the village of Berdskaya. The synod recognized this morganatic marriage as illegal. Dreyer and his whole family were ordered to leave for Vologda, but the Grand Duke appeared at the station with a revolver in his hand and announced that he was ready to open fire - they say, I'm crazy, I still won't do anything. So the order of the Sovereign Emperor could not be fulfilled.

This marriage can hardly be called successful, because with a living wife, Nikolai Konstantinovich managed to get married with two more underage girls, but more on that later. In the meantime, everything went like in a fairy tale by Leonid Filatov:

“I admit my guilt.
Meru. Power. Depth
And ask me to send
On the current war.
No war - I will accept everything -
The link. Hard labor The prison.
But preferably in July,
And preferably in the Crimea.”

The disgraced Grand Duke was sent to the Crimea, where they tried to treat him with “electricity sessions”, and he spent the rest of the time as follows: he slept until dinner, then read newspapers, then rode in a carriage and did gymnastic exercises on parallel bars, and also wrote a note “On relations of Emperor Paul I to the boyars. Then Nikolai was transferred to Samara, where in April 1880 he was again examined by Professor Balinsky and Dr. Dyukov, who had previously examined him.

At the insistence of Father Nicholas, Emperor Alexander II allowed the "sick" to move to the Pustynka estate, which was located about an hour's drive from the St. Petersburg Nikolaevsky railway station. He moved there in November 1880, where he was often visited by his younger brother Dmitry Konstantinovich and some other St. Petersburg aristocrats, and also periodically examined by I. M. Balinsky, mentioned above.

Nicholas tried to use the assassination of Alexander II (March 1, 1881) as an opportunity to return to Petersburg: he turned to his cousin Alexander III with a request to allow him to come to Petersburg in order to “pray to the ashes of the adored monarch”, and received the answer:

"How long I live, you will not see Petersburg."

This brought the disgraced Grand Duke out of himself, and he announced his refusal to swear allegiance to the new emperor, since "mad people are not sworn in."

And to Countess M. Kleinmichel, he said:

“I will put on the Order of St. Andrew, I will go out to the people, and the people will rise up and protect me.”

(Recall that he was officially deprived of all orders).

On March 28, 1881, Alexander III responded to these demarches of his cousin by ordering his arrest and placement in the Pavlovsk Fortress Mariental (BIP). However, it was soon recognized as undesirable "to put the Grand Duke now in the position of a state prisoner", since

“At the same time, legends will be created that will surround the Grand Duke with the halo of a martyr for the truth, perhaps a people’s mourner and intercessor, a hero of democratic institutions.”

And what would be better if Nikolai Konstantinovich were

"pity like an unfortunate patient, rather than sympathize and worship him like a victim."

As a result, in May 1881, a decision was made to transfer Nikolai to Turkestan, and he was ordered to be treated as "a private person, and not a member of the imperial house." He was ordered to live under the name of Colonel Volynsky, but later he arbitrarily appropriated the surname Iskander (with a hint of Alexander the Great, of course). Nadezhda Dreyer was allowed to accompany the Grand Duke. In 1899, another emperor, Nicholas II, granted this woman hereditary nobility and the surname Iskander.


N. K. Romanov (who here is very similar to Ippolit Matveevich Vorobyaninov) and N. A. Dreyer

And the mother of the Grand Duke later sent him to Tashkent the very “Venus with an Apple”, which was described in the first article - a copy of the sculpture of Pauline Borghese with the face of Fanny Lear. Now this work by Tommaso Solari can be seen in the Tashkent State Museum of Art (and a smaller copy in the Yusupov Palace in St. Petersburg). The Tashkent museum mentioned above also contains a collection of European and Russian paintings that belonged to Nikolai Konstantinovich.

Tashkent exile of Nikolai Konstantinovich


So, the disgraced Grand Duke was settled in Tashkent, and Alexander III allocated a huge sum of 300 rubles plus a monthly “disability pension” of 12 rubles for its arrangement. Let us point out for comparison that a skilled metallurgist at that time received 23–35 rubles a month, doctors and teachers - 80 rubles, a colonel - 325 rubles, a general in the position of commander of a division - 350 rubles, a governor - 1 rubles, a minister - 000 1 rubles. That is, the high-society dunce, who robbed his own parents, cost the Russian treasury like 500 ministers. There is nothing to say, but “Russia, which we have lost”, was good.


Tashkent Palace of Nikolai Konstantinovich on a postcard of 1909. In Soviet times, one of the museums was located here, and now it is used as a reception house of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Initially, Nikolai was not allowed to leave the city; in case of disobedience, the governor-general had the right to arrest him.

Later, he was forbidden to visit his seriously ill father. It was pointed out that “his arrival is not desirable and completely impossible,” and it was reported that Alexandra Iosifovna’s mother, younger brother Konstantin (a poet who published under the initials K. R., Nikolai’s official guardian) and sister Olga objected to the arrival.

I must say that in the future, Nikolai Konstantinovich, having received permission to leave Tashkent, organized several expeditions, financed irrigation work. Only on irrigated lands along the 100-kilometer Nikolaevsky (Romanovsky) Canal, by 1913, 113 (and according to other sources - even 119) Russian settlements and 2 estates of his personal estate "Golden Horde" were built (there were 10 estates in total). Investments in the construction of this grandiose hydraulic structure amounted to about one million rubles.


Canal in the Turkestan steppe

In Tashkent, through the efforts of Nikolai Konstantinovich, a zoo, a hospital for the poor and an almshouse were opened. He also established 10 scholarships for immigrants from Turkestan - for their study at Russian universities. The Grand Duke published a book in which it was proved that the Amu Darya changed the direction of its flow more than once and the reason was the economic activity of the local population (probably, a highly qualified specialist, whose name remained unknown, helped him in working on this book).

It turned out that the Grand Duke has good entrepreneurial skills. He cultivated cotton and built a cotton gin in Tashkent. He also owned the “Bazaars of the Grand Duke in the Hungry Steppe” (along the railway line), a soap factory, a kvass production enterprise, billiard halls, photo workshops, a circus, the first Khiva cinema in Tashkent and ... a brothel with a very peculiar name - “ Grandma's." I wonder which of his grandmothers he had in mind? All these enterprises, which brought a total income of up to 1,4 million rubles a year, were registered in the name of N. Dreyer.

But at the same time, the Grand Duke continued to play weird, constantly giving rise to gossip and extremely annoying with his extravagant, and often simply scandalous antics of relatives in St. Petersburg. So, in his luxurious palace, he occupied only one room with a low ceiling, in which half a dozen dogs were constantly with him, and he slept with them right on the floor. The barber ordered to shave his entire body - from the crown to the heels.

In the meantime, he seduced the minor daughter of Colonel Berkhman. In 1895, with his living wife, he married a 15-year-old Cossack girl Daria Eliseevna Chasovitina, and in 1900 he also married a 16-year-old high school student Valeria Khmelnitskaya. This "marriage" was the last straw. A special commission was sent to Tashkent to deal with the "arts" of Nikolai, which included psychiatrists P. Rosenbach, assistant professor at the Imperial Military Medical Academy, and V. Hardin, director of the Tvorkovskaya psychiatric hospital. The medical examination lasted 6 weeks, the conclusions were as follows:

“Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich is currently discovering the phenomena of a mental disorder in the form of a degenerative psychosis with a dulling of moral feelings ... There is no hope for the possibility of healing the Grand Duke, he cannot be given complete freedom, since the disease approaches in its form and degree to the care of a minor subject."

The doctors' diagnosis was as follows: "Folie morale" - "moral madness." At present, one would probably talk about pronounced psychopathy and sociopathy. Some believe that the cause of the periodic inappropriate behavior of the Grand Duke could be a manic-depressive syndrome.

The marriage of Nikolai with Khmelnitskaya was annulled, her family was deported to Tiflis, the Grand Duke was first transferred to Tver, then to Balaklava, but there he began to threaten "to flee to England to his friend King Edward." In 1904 he had to be sent to Stavropol. Only in 1906, thanks to the efforts of his sister Olga Konstantinovna, who became the Queen of Greece, he was allowed to return to his beloved Tashkent. Here he enthusiastically received the news of the February Revolution and the abdication of Nicholas II: he ordered the red flag to be raised over the palace and sent a telegram of congratulations to the Provisional Government, which was "reproduced in all the newspapers."

Another member of the Romanov dynasty who betrayed his dynasty was the Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich, who personally appeared at the residence of the Provisional Government with a red bow and, according to the testimony of the palace commandant V. N. Voeikov, told Duma Chairman M. V. Rodzianko:

“I have the honor to appear to Your Excellency. I am at your disposal, as are all the people. I wish the good of Russia."

And he assured that the Guards subordinate to him naval the crew will comply with all orders of the new government. He later self-proclaimed himself emperor in Munich. However, according to the laws of the Russian Empire, Kirill Vladimirovich had no right to the throne, since he was married to a divorced Lutheran cousin, Nicholas II even intended to deprive him of the rights of a member of the imperial family.

It was his impostor great-grandson, with the connivance of the St. Petersburg authorities, on October 1, 2021, scandalously married in St. Isaac's Cathedral with a certain Rebecca Bettarini, which caused clear associations with the plot of the film "The Crown of the Russian Empire". Many were shocked by the long veil of the bride with the image of the imperial double-headed eagle, which dragged along the ground and asphalt.

But back to Nikolai Konstantinovich and his wife.

The disgraced Grand Duke died of pneumonia after the establishment of Soviet power in Turkestan - on January 27, 1918. His morganatic wife N. A. Dreyer remained in Tashkent. They argue about the date of her death, most often they call 1929, it is believed that she died from the bite of a stray dog. The Swiss writer Ellie Meilart recalled meeting her at a bazaar in Soviet Tashkent:

“It was not possible to interview the wife of the Grand Duke. Her wavy hair was covered with a scarf, and her old face was powdered. The princess moved from counter to counter with a displeased look and an inquisitorial look. The princess was dressed in a gray jacket of excellent quality and a white dress with a selection, she leaned on an umbrella like a crutch, carrying a briefcase at hand. I could not take my eyes off her, but the Princess did not notice me. The princess did not buy anything, but only became more indignant because of the price of grapes.

But Meilart managed to take a photograph, which she placed in her book "Turkestan Solo":


N. A. Dreyer at the Tashkent Bazaar

"Queen of the Arbat"


The two sons of Nadezhda Dreyer and Nikolai Konstantinovich have special traces in stories have not left. The elder Artemy died in exile, the younger Nikolai died during the Civil War. But the youngest daughter of Nikolai, who was born in 1917, was a very famous lady in the USSR, albeit "in narrow circles."

Natalya Nikolaevna Androsova (the surname of her stepfather) became a master of sports in motorcycle racing and in the pre-war years she performed in the Moscow Gorky Park with the attraction “motor racing along a vertical wall”. She was seriously injured more than once, but sat on a motorcycle until 1967.


N. Androsova-Iskander

During the war she worked as a lorry driver. She carried bread to the front line, and sometimes snow for the construction of defensive barriers. At night, she was on duty on the roofs - extinguishing incendiary bombs. After the war, she married film director N.V. Dostal, whose most famous film is probably the film “We met somewhere” (filmed together with A.P. Tutyshkin) with A. Raikin in the title role.

In 1959, her husband died on the set of the film Everything Starts on the Road. She raised her husband's adopted children - these are directors V. N. Dostal (much better known as a successful producer) and N. N. Dostal (also a screenwriter and actor). N. Androsova had extensive connections in the artistic and literary environment, was friends with A. Vertinsky, E. Yevtushenko, A. Voznesensky, Yu. Nikulin, Yu. Nagibin, A. Galich, she was even called the “Queen of the Arbat”. Nagibin wrote about her:

“Which of the old Muscovites does not remember the legendary Natalya Androsova, who shook the wooden pavilion in the Park of Culture and Leisure with her frenzied motorcycle? The fearless beauty became the queen of the old Arbat, where she lived in the basement, only with the arrival of Bulat Okudzhava did the dual kingdom begin.


Natalya Androsova-Iskander, 1950s

She died in July 1999 and was buried at the Vagankovsky cemetery.
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    April 26 2023 05: 27
    Thank you Valery!
    I will write only one thing - the ways of the Lord are inscrutable, especially if you do not know his plan!

    However!
    During the war she worked as a lorry driver. She carried bread to the front line, and sometimes snow for the construction of defensive barriers. At night, she was on duty on the roofs - extinguishing incendiary bombs.

    I take my hat off to this woman!
    1. +4
      April 26 2023 07: 24
      I completely agree with you and join in the words of gratitude to Valery for the article! hi
      Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
      Thank you Valery!
      I will write only one thing - the ways of the Lord are inscrutable, especially if you do not know his plan!

      However!
      During the war she worked as a lorry driver. She carried bread to the front line, and sometimes snow for the construction of defensive barriers. At night, she was on duty on the roofs - extinguishing incendiary bombs.

      I take my hat off to this woman!

      Low bow to her from me! love
    2. +8
      April 26 2023 18: 32
      Namesake, good evening. Out of disgust: she was not the only one who "was on duty on the roofs" and drove a lorry. How many, boys and girls, were on duty on the roofs. During the war and post-war times, many women worked as chauffeurs. My late aunt, from 1948 to 1957 worked as a driver.
      But in general, well done Androsov! irrepressible woman
      1. +1
        April 26 2023 19: 07
        Quote: vladcub
        Namesake, good evening. Out of disgust: she was not the only one who "was on duty on the roofs" and drove a lorry. How many, boys and girls, were on duty on the roofs. During the war and post-war times, many women worked as chauffeurs. My late aunt, from 1948 to 1957 worked as a driver.
        But in general, well done Androsov! irrepressible woman

        Namesake - I do not argue!!! Thank you for everything, without exception!
  2. +2
    April 26 2023 07: 31
    It seems that N.K. until the end of his life was an infantile, a big child who was simply not very aware of the consequences of his actions. Not without abilities, but they did not explain to him "what is good, what is bad." I liked the girl - seduce or get married, do not care that the wife is. He did not even think about relatives, their reputation and honor - it is not surprising that they hated him so much.
    1. +1
      April 26 2023 18: 38
      It seems that he deliberately teased: here you are pompous snobs
    2. +2
      April 26 2023 18: 57
      Fuck what an infantile, 1.5 million income, he adored him in Tashkent. And this is your psycho?
  3. +8
    April 26 2023 07: 52
    that the reason for the periodic inappropriate behavior of the Grand Duke could be a manic-depressive syndrome.
    And the worst part is, it's not my fault.
    Really? - True. Not guilty! The ancestors are to blame! Great-grandfathers, great-grandmothers, great uncles, aunts are different, forefathers, well, and foremothers, yeah. In life, they behaved like the last pigs, and now I'm disentangling their past. Well, parasites, here, one word, excuse me for the subtlety of such rudeness of expression, harshness, now to say, parasites, that's all. And I myself am a kind-hearted, clever person by nature, I love poetry, prose, music, painting, I love fishing. Yes, I love cats. But sometimes you throw out something that just becomes in your soul ... "(c)
    1. VLR
      +3
      April 26 2023 07: 57
      Continuing to quote Filatov:
      Well, by chance, well, jokingly
      Strayed from the right path!
      Duck, I’m a child of nature,
      Let it be evil, but a child!
      1. +10
        April 26 2023 09: 00
        Good morning! I would venture to add to the famous films of Nikolai Dostal a picture * The Case of the "Motley" *.

        Thank you for the article! hi
        1. +2
          April 26 2023 17: 39
          Never looked. The surname is familiar, but the titles of the films do not say anything at all.
          Which ones do you recommend watching?
          1. +5
            April 26 2023 19: 19
            Quote from lisikat2
            Which ones do you recommend watching?

            But how can I tell you? Actually, the director himself made only five films, of which one * short film *. One film was recommended to you by a respected author, the second is me. the role of Natalia Krachkovskaya, the second is Alexander Demyanenko. He is not only * Shurik *, but also a brilliant dramatic actor. In principle, the old Soviet cinema is .... like cognac. Every year it gets better and better. This can be attributed to the Soviet actors. The choice is yours, dear. hi
            1. +1
              April 26 2023 20: 18
              Phil, Sergey, good evening, in general, I agree: Soviet cinema was great, but for the sake of truth, both Hollywood and Bollywood, in general, all cinema, used to be of high quality. Perhaps, until the beginning of the 90s, the last "splash" - Fanfan - a tulip, and then nonsense. Although some of our latest tapes are quite "edible": "According to the laws of wartime", "Military intelligence", for the present time, almost ideal, on a solid 4. There are, of course, blunders and very dubious moments, but overall good movies. The main thing that is good in them: there is no "darkness".
              PS. I don't know about you, but I didn't like "industrial" tapes - mura. Although, sometimes I began to review "production" films of the 70s. To remember the era. My "pink snot" is watching or dubious humor and I'm sick of this
              1. +2
                April 26 2023 20: 52
                Quote: vladcub
                I didn't like "industrial" tapes - mura.

                I would not argue that the same * Height *, * Spring on Zarechnaya Street *, * Prize * and a number of * production * paintings are such a mess.
                Slav, the time was different. Absolutely different. And the people were different. And the tasks for the cinema were different. And we perceived this movie differently. Has it gotten worse? Better? Everyone decides for himself. hi
              2. +2
                April 26 2023 21: 03
                Quote: vladcub
                production" films of the 70s.

                * And it's all about him *? With Kostolevsky? Well, it's an excellent multi-part film, isn't it? Although ... * production *. bully
      2. +1
        April 26 2023 19: 02
        Valery wrote above, in the comments of the last article it was already well said
  4. +7
    April 26 2023 08: 03
    Valery, colleagues good morning. .
    I'm running home: SON HAS COME ON VACATION! Taking time off from work
    1. +3
      April 26 2023 17: 28
      Congratulations, Vera, I am very happy for you and for him.
  5. +2
    April 26 2023 09: 53
    "Venus with an Apple" gives an eerie impression ....
    Over time, the marble acquired a bluish tint...
    1. +3
      April 26 2023 17: 27
      Are you talking about Tashkent? Or about the one in the Yusupov Palace?
  6. +6
    April 26 2023 11: 33
    That is, the high-society dunce, who robbed his own parents, cost the Russian treasury like 8 ministers. There is nothing to say, but “Russia, which we have lost”, was good.

    Judging by what is written below, the Grand Duke was by no means a dunce, and he spent the allocated money far from only for his own pleasures and eccentricities. Canal, factories, new settlements, cinema with a brothel))
    1. 0
      April 26 2023 12: 58
      Don't you think that all this was for him a game like a computer strategy? See how many projects and all are different. The construction of the canal alone must have taken all the time. But he "lit up" - and, apparently, quickly lost interest, was fond of something new. But the money had already been allocated, and the hired specialists were smart, they brought everything to mind.
      1. +3
        April 26 2023 15: 44
        "... and the hired specialists were smart, they brought everything to mind."

        “Hired specialists” must be able to “distinguish” among other specialists, as well as control their work, otherwise you will be left penniless. It seems that the “infantil” coped well with this, despite the so-called disease.
      2. +2
        April 26 2023 15: 53
        But the money had already been allocated, and the hired specialists were smart, they brought everything to mind.

        This is actually the ideal implementation of the project. If he played some Tropico, he did it well.
      3. +2
        April 26 2023 18: 56
        "quickly losing interest" is not a fact. If he lost interest in the channel, the bar might die out. How many projects there were, before and after him, as soon as the customer loses interest and the construction stalls.
        Most likely, he really was a keen nature, hence such different projects. But he periodically controlled his orders
  7. +9
    April 26 2023 12: 58
    Valery, if you are going to write a story, then write a story, if you decide to write an accusatory article, then do not call it a story! Nikolai Konstantinovich left a bright mark in the development of Turkestan, but he became interesting to you by creating a brothel! The money allocated for its maintenance causes you only inhuman envy, and what this money was spent on is practically of no interest to you! You are happy to delve into dirty linen, but the fact that this linen was a protest against an unfair attitude towards the subject you are describing, you don’t even want to pay attention! The Grand Duke was so popular among the common people of Turkestan that even the Bolsheviks did not dare to rename the village of Iskander, and the canal that once irrigated the foothill steppe is still called Iskander ditch! This channel, too, was built with funds and under the control of Prince Nikolai, who had gone mad with fat!
    1. +1
      April 26 2023 13: 09
      The facts are stated, but you do not like the way they are presented? I think everyone is entitled to an opinion. And not everyone is obliged to admire this character and write about him not articles, but the lives of the great martyr.
      1. +7
        April 26 2023 13: 20
        Quote: vet
        The facts are stated, but you do not like the way they are presented?

        Personally, I rather do not like what is stated Not only facts and not all facts.
        Quote: vet
        I think everyone is entitled to an opinion.

        Beyond a doubt. hi
      2. +5
        April 26 2023 15: 04
        Quote: vet
        And not everyone is obliged to admire this character and write about him not articles, but the lives of the great martyr.

        I'm not suggesting to admire, but I'm not suggesting pouring mud!
        Write a story, write it honestly!!! And do not invent a gag! By the way, the youngest son of this man fought in the Red Army, participated in battles with Dutov! Let's call this Red Army soldier a moral freak, why not?!
        1. 0
          April 27 2023 08: 55
          Quote: "Do not invent a gag"
          Do you even understand what you wrote? Any opinion that differs from what is written in a textbook or some kind of party newspaper falls under the "gag". You should work in the "Ministry of Truth".
          Let us still leave our authors the right to personal opinion. Otherwise, reading VO will be hopelessly boring. By the way, why don't you write your own article about this prince? You like it, state your point of view, trying nevertheless to be correct in all respects, objective and not to fall into the style of the "Father Menaion". Forget for a while that from the "Ministry of Truth" (just kidding, don't be offended).
          It will be constructive.
          1. +2
            April 27 2023 19: 38
            In this case, it is you who are attacking an opinion different from the author's
            request
    2. +1
      April 26 2023 19: 08
      "did not dare to rename" they immediately had no time, and later they simply forgot. If it was called: Nikolaevsky, Tsarsky or some Spaso, they would have renamed it, but they forgot it. Over time, the locals forgot: who was Iskander
      1. +3
        April 27 2023 07: 41
        Quote: vladcub
        immediately they had no time, and later they simply forgot.

        How bad you think about the communists! In Turkestan, all the settlements, in the names of which the trinity appeared, were renamed even before the war ... except for the second estate of the prince, it still has the name Troitsk!
        Quote: vladcub
        Over time, the locals forgot: who was Iskander

        Not at all, Tashkent has a good memory! Fergana railway. The people still call the station Gorchakovo!
  8. +4
    April 26 2023 12: 58
    I see the author continued in his repertoire?)))
    But what if there is a little bit of impartiality?
    A young man in the prime of life and ability was accused of being apparently didn't doand condemned without trial. Stronger ones also broke from such things.
    he turned to his cousin Alexander III

    who hated his father and transferred his feelings to all members of this family
    So, the disgraced Grand Duke was settled in Tashkent, and Alexander III allocated a huge sum of 300 rubles plus a monthly “disability pension” of 12 rubles for its arrangement. For comparison, let's say...

    ... other grand dukes of the same status (that is, the grandchildren of the emperor), by decree of the same Alexander III, were supposed to
    an annual maintenance of 15 rubles until the age of majority or marriage and 000 rubles upon reaching the age of majority (plus a lump sum of 150 rubles for establishment).

    In other words, his majesty, as usual, managed to save a lot of money. However, in this case, I can not blame him for this)))
    Well, it’s completely incomprehensible why compare with workers? Nevertheless, Nikolai Konstantinovich is an aristocrat, and among the high society of that time, an annual income of 12000 ... well, so-so
    That is, the high-society dunce, who robbed his own parents, cost the Russian treasury like 8 ministers.

    That's just "not the treasury" and the author should have known this. The maintenance of members of the imperial family came from the income of the so-called "ministry of appanages".
    This institution was engaged in the management of assets belonging to the emperor and his family personally. That is, roughly speaking, the tsar-priest paid a disgraced relative from his own.
    But ... unlike other members of the family, Nikolai Konstantinovich did not drink away his maintenance in Paris, but put it into action and left behind a grateful memory.
    She raised her husband's adopted children - these are directors V.N. Dostal (much better known as a successful producer) and N. N. Dostal (also screenwriter and actor).

    So write - the creator of the notorious series "Shtrafbat"!
    1. +5
      April 26 2023 16: 40
      The author does not want to understand the reasons for the occurrence of facts.
    2. 0
      April 26 2023 17: 25
      Sorry, I didn't watch "Shtrafbat". Is it good that Dostal filmed him or bad?
      1. +1
        April 26 2023 19: 22
        Quote: vet
        that Dostal filmed him or badly?

        This is a stepson. So ... with a beard. laughing
      2. +1
        April 27 2023 19: 18
        Quote: vet
        Sorry, I didn't watch "Shtrafbat".

        It is likely that they did the right thing.
        Quote: vet
        Is it good that Dostal filmed him or bad?

        He wrote a script in which he collected all possible myths and fables.
    3. +4
      April 26 2023 18: 15
      The whole text seems to be pulled from everywhere without reflection. If he was so on his head that he "sleep on the floor with dogs," then he could not command any organization of work on the construction of the canal. More than a hundred villages, this is a whole epic for hire on the Central Russian Plain and the transfer of families.
      If he had married a schoolgirl while his wife was still alive, then his wife would have hit him on the head with plates, and the schoolgirl would have gotten it too.
      In general, the story is so strange that it is not clear where is the truth and where is someone's slander.
      1. VLR
        -1
        April 26 2023 18: 35
        Here, including because of such "oddities" the Empire collapsed. He wasn't the only weird one. Another Romanov, LBGT-shnik Sergey Alexandrovich arranged Khodynka from a great mind. After the attempt on Kalyaev, Muscovites said that the blown up led. the prince for the first time in his life "brained". The wife of Tsar Rasputin welcomed him, and the princesses-countesses kissed his dirty hands. The murderer of Rasputin, Yusupov, was treated by the "Starets" for "blueness". The holy fool Mitya Kozelsky "communed" the royal daughters from mouth to mouth. The highest aristocracy has rotted - in the bud.
        And, of course, Nikolai Konstantinovich, of course, could not command the grandiose construction work on the canal, and did not command. I'm glad you understood that. Here, as in Nekrasov's "Railway": "Daddy, who built the road? Count Kleinmichel, darling!"
        1. +3
          April 26 2023 19: 24
          Valery, on the whole, I agree with you, but do not hook Khodynka Kolya to the "henpecked" one. This is the usual FUCKING
          1. VLR
            +2
            April 26 2023 20: 02
            Khodynka - on the conscience of Sergei Alexandrovich, he was responsible for choosing a place and organizing the event. However, Nikolai also distinguished himself - he danced the "mazurka on the bones" with the French ambassador.
        2. 0
          April 27 2023 08: 00
          Quote: VlR
          LBGT-shnik Sergei Alexandrovich from a great mind arranged for Khodynka

          And another LBGT-shnik arranged for 37+ years and shot all the Bolsheviks out of a great mind! Probably because of this we lost the country for the second time?
          Quote: VlR
          The wife of Tsar Rasputin welcomed

          laughing I see you are a fan of "fried facts"!
          Quote: VlR
          And, of course, Nikolai Konstantinovich, of course, could not command the grandiose construction work on the canal, and did not command.

          Yes, yes, disappearing for weeks at the construction site, he exclusively caught butterflies!
          Your opinion is interesting ... did Stalin lead the industrialization? Or is it different?
          1. VLR
            0
            April 27 2023 08: 30
            As for Raspustin, I have here an article "Russian Cagliostro or Grigory Rasputin, as a mirror of the Russian revolution." Very objective, everyone liked it, you can look, I think it’s not wasted time. And there are no "fried" facts - only historical, easily confirmed by numerous sources.
            1. +4
              April 27 2023 11: 39
              Quote: VlR
              Very objective, everyone liked it, you can look, I think it’s not wasted time. And there are no "fried" facts

              My friend, I tried to read ... and immediately a lot of mistakes! Belitsky did not write his memoirs, but as if his book "Grigory Rasputin" is nothing more than an arbitrary interpretation of Beletsky's testimony during interrogation at the Extraordinary Investigation Commission of the Provisional Government on Rasputin. The opinion of Professor A.P. Kotsiubinsky, based on Rasputin's diaries, which do not exist in nature, there is only Rasputin's reasoning .. but there is nothing about politics and sex! Vyrubova's diary also turned out to be a fake, and the medical commission created by the Extraordinary Commission, to their great disappointment, recognized Vyrubova as a virgin ... can you imagine?
              The whole problem, my dear Valery, is that you are not interested in documents, but rather trust someone else's opinion, and only the opinion that is similar to yours!
              hi
              1. -1
                April 27 2023 12: 43
                For some reason, you cannot admit that everyone unequivocally and equally likes only banknotes. And people are not all and not the same. Not only historical figures, but also just people - neighbors, colleagues. And you can't force someone to love you. And that's okay. And in history it is very useful when there is an opportunity to look at one person and one event from different angles. I already suggested that you come up with your article, in which you could give your point of view, of course and very desirable -
                reasoned, objective, and not made up of compliments by everyone to the offended sufferer-prince.
                1. +3
                  April 27 2023 13: 43
                  Quote: vet
                  For some reason, you cannot admit that everyone unequivocally and equally likes only banknotes. And people are not all and not the same.

                  Again! History, this is not a beauty contest .... like it, don't like it, look from a different angle - this is for political observers!
                  Quote: vet
                  Could you give your point of view

                  If you are not careful, I already gave it!
                  Quote: vet
                  reasoned, objective

                  My friend, for three years I have been trying to write the history of Russian Turkestan, for three years I have been working on sources, for three years I have been weeding out the husks by comparing facts, and even after three years I understand that I don’t know anything about this topic! Do you want some kind of argument from me within a couple of days?

                  Quote: vet
                  composed of nothing but compliments to the offended sufferer-prince.

                  laughing compliments? There are no compliments, there is only the notion that the history of this prince has deeper reasons for his disgrace and they are connected with dynastic affairs, and not with theft and dementia! For example .... judging by the statements of Khrushchev, Mikoyan, Malinkov, Stalin is an obscurantist, a coward and not a distant person ... can their words be considered true? Or are these words just an attempt to justify their actions?
                  1. -1
                    April 27 2023 16: 02
                    Quote: "History is not a beauty pageant"
                    But not mathematics, where twice two is always four. Read different authoritative historians who, using the same documents, write about the same problem - and for some reason, very often come to different conclusions. Your arrogance and claims to the only true version do you no credit as a historian and researcher. And he speaks precisely of the bias in which you accuse others. As you wish, but your attempts to ignore the opinions of psychiatrists and even parents, inventing dynastic problems, are extremely unconvincing.
                    1. -1
                      April 27 2023 17: 15
                      By the way, I am a doctor, and for me one official opinion of specialists is worth much more than a dozen far-fetched speculative arguments about dynastic problems. And this prince was examined throughout his life more than once, by different doctors, very authoritative, and I see no reason to doubt their conclusions. And I don’t see any grounds or reasons for the prince’s parents, brothers and sisters to “set up” him, declaring him crazy. For them, there is no interest in this and there is no reasonable explanation for this "conspiracy". If "he became a victim of intrigue", on the contrary, they should intercede, seek justice.
                      1. +1
                        April 27 2023 19: 26
                        Damn and this man offers
                        Quote: vet
                        Read various authoritative historians

                        Have you read them yourself?
                        Quote: vet
                        And I don’t see any grounds and reasons for the parents, brothers and sisters of the prince to “substitute” him,

                        The author wrote exactly the opposite, the sisters and brothers tried to help him, but you managed not to notice it.
                        Quote: vet
                        By the way, I am a doctor, and for me one official conclusion of specialists

                        Are you a doctor and know nothing about the history of psychiatry?
                      2. 0
                        April 28 2023 06: 39
                        Well, I don’t know about you, but I heard about the problems of interpreting the event of the first century of the Russian state. And about the ambiguous attitude to the reforms of Peter 1. And also about the opposite points of view on the behavior and role of Kutuzov in the battle of Borodino. And much more.
                        As for psychiatry, at the time described it was already a fully formed science, then the terms changed, new drugs appeared. But with regard to the prince, the psychiatrists were right and the occupational therapist was not mistaken. If it were not for this recommendation of theirs, perhaps he would not have had any entrepreneurial activity. Just as weird as in the Crimea and Orenburg.
                      3. +5
                        April 28 2023 08: 01
                        Quote: vet
                        Just as weird as in the Crimea and Orenburg.

                        Those. just a weirdo, which clearly confirmed the diagnosis of psychiatrists? And the fact that he was categorically forbidden to have official heirs, how will the luminary of medical thought look at this? What will an unbiased psychiatrist say about the fact that both of his secret weddings were canceled by the Highest Synod?
                        And finally ... according to the dynastic "Instructions" of Paul the First, only the eldest son of the sovereign could be the heir to the throne, or, under impossible conditions, the eldest son of the descendant brother of the father of the current sovereign. The father of the person we are discussing, Konstantin Nikolaevich, was just the Dauphin, which is why after the tragic death of Nikolai Alexandrovich, the eldest son of Alexander the Second, Nikolai Konstantinovich was the main contender for the throne! Alexander II, not wanting to give the reins of government of the state into the hands of the Konstantinoviches, already a couple of days after the death of his heir, declared his second son the heir, which was illegal. It was this that angered many members of the Romanov family, and it was this that was the birth of the grand-ducal opposition to both subsequent tsars after Alexander II.
                        Here it is, the Hippocratic oath...not for everyone and not for everyone!!!
                        hi Good luck in your professional activities!
                      4. +1
                        April 28 2023 20: 50
                        Quote: vet
                        Well, I don’t know about you, but I heard about the problems of interpreting the event of the first century of the Russian state. And about the ambiguous attitude to the reforms of Peter 1. And also about the opposite points of view on the behavior and role of Kutuzov in the battle of Borodino. And much more...

                        What has nothing to do with the topic of discussion? belay
                        I noticed Yes
                        Quote: vet
                        As for psychiatry, at the time described it was already a fully formed science, then the terms changed, new drugs appeared.

                        Yeah. And also methods of treatment. Like a lobotomy. The inventor was also awarded the Nobel Prize. feel
                        So, a person who got to a psychiatrist in those days had no way to escape, regardless of the diagnosis.
                        Quote: vet
                        But with regard to the prince, the psychiatrists were right

                        What area of ​​medicine do you specialize in?
                        Quote: vet
                        Just so weird

                        And what else could a person do, from whom everything was taken away without guilt?
                    2. +4
                      April 28 2023 07: 37
                      Quote: vet
                      Your arrogance and claims to the only true version do you no credit

                      laughing It remains only to call me mentally ill and send me into disgrace!
                      Quote: vet
                      Read various authoritative historians,

                      For example? Advise whom to read?
                      Quote: vet
                      for some reason, they often come to different conclusions

                      That's precisely why, to you, as a doctor, I, as a gynecologist, declare that, from such a free attitude to history by some people, our society has divided into two warring camps to the delight of our ill-wishers! Do you agree with my plumbing and gynecological diagnosis?
                      Quote: vet
                      Your attempts to ignore the opinions of psychiatrists

                      Tell me, as a doctor, was the diagnosis of citizen Timashuk scientifically substantiated???
    4. +2
      April 26 2023 19: 13
      Ivan, good evening, but I deliberately did not look: I don’t like it when they speculate on the past
  9. +4
    April 26 2023 13: 20
    Tashkent Palace of Nikolai Konstantinovich on a postcard of 1909. In Soviet times, one of the museums was located here, and now it is used as a reception house of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan

    In Soviet times, the palace was the Republican House of Pioneers.
  10. +2
    April 26 2023 15: 00
    Good day to everyone, I don’t know about others, but I can’t answer, it’s terribly “hangs”
    And Zen passes
  11. +1
    April 26 2023 15: 23
    Valery, I thought for a long time how to characterize Nikolai Konstantinovich: crazy? He's not crazy, but he's not completely normal either. However, Svyadoshch says: "the concept of" norm "does not exist. From the point of view of the abnormal, he is then normal, but those around him are not normal ..
    It seems that she has found a definition: a passionate person who was born 150-200 years late. Of these, conquistadors were obtained, he would have shown himself in the "Thirty Years' War", in the Time of Troubles he could have shown himself. Not necessarily in Pozharsky's militia, the "Pretender" could also turn out to be.
    In GW it could be both "red" and "white", but most likely "green". Such as the "fish in the water" in a hectic environment . A measured life is not for them
    1. VLR
      0
      April 26 2023 16: 03
      Here it was correctly pointed out that almost the main feature of the character of this prince was infantilism. So, having been born into a simple family and left to his own devices, he would most likely have ended his life as a vagabond. It is quite possible that he would have become rich several times, but he did not sit still. Probably, several times I would have ended up in a "jailhouse" - but on trifles. People who knew him would speak of him as a good-for-nothing but harmless loser. But this, of course, is my personal opinion. I don't claim to be 100% hit.
      1. +3
        April 26 2023 21: 03
        "but harmless Loser" Valery, this is too much. "Loser" having: 1,5 million in income from his projects!! If only we were all such losers.
        Please do not be offended, but you have some kind of partiality. If someone doesn't like it then . . You can impartially tell about others, but if you don't like someone . ...
        1. VLR
          +1
          April 27 2023 06: 24
          When compared with modern realities, then you are confusing a member of the Yeltsin "family of oligarchs" with a small businessman from the people. Berezovsky - with the owner of a roadside shop, Abramovich - with the owner of a small auto repair shop. Opportunities - both starting and further are completely different.
          Here is Theodora, about whom the next article will be discussed - indeed, a super-passionate woman who "made herself": in spite of everything and everyone, she rose from absolute poverty to absolute power. And in government, she was even leading in a pair with Justinian - unlike Catherine I, who was simply lucky and who, after the death of Peter I, the empress, abandoned all her affairs and simply drank herself.
  12. +4
    April 26 2023 16: 05
    “The Grand Duke appeared at the station with a revolver in his hand and announced that he was ready to open fire ....”

    The act of a real man ready to do anything to protect his family.
    His St. Petersburg relatives were not capable of such a thing, without resistance they allowed themselves to be arrested and destroyed.
    1. +5
      April 26 2023 17: 28
      Take, for example, the situation in which he offered his hand and heart to 15-year-old Chasovitina. This young lady was actually supposed to marry another person, but the wedding, due to the fact that the dowry was less than it should have been in collusion with the bride's parents, was upset. The angry groom made a scandal, swearing, announced that he would be deceived, that he would not go down the aisle with such a thing. And at this moment, out of nowhere, the Grand Duke appears and rushes to the aid of the rejected bride. As he himself recalled, the sobbing Dasha seemed to him so unhappy and so beautiful that, picking her up in his arms, he jumped into the cab, which was waiting for the young (but not the prince!), decorated with wedding ribbons, and rushed to the church, where they were married.
      1. VLR
        0
        April 26 2023 17: 45
        Well, here, isn't it infantilism? A middle-aged already married (and married) man grabs an unfamiliar girl and gets married with her too! No wonder psychiatrists later recognized that the level of development of the prince corresponds to a minor, a teenager.
        1. +2
          April 27 2023 00: 00
          This is a misunderstanding of the realities of that time. From your side.
          1. VLR
            0
            April 27 2023 06: 11
            On the contrary, misunderstanding on your part. Bisexual Orthodox in the Russian Empire was punished, at a minimum, by condemnation to celibacy (both marriages were annulled) and many years of church repentance. N.K. Romanov knew this very well, but this did not prevent him from getting married for the third time, since the underage girl he liked turned out to be moral and intractable. By the way, he also framed the priests, who performed the wedding ceremony for the second or third time, deceiving them. Human behavior is not just infantile, but absolutely immoral.
    2. VLR
      +1
      April 26 2023 18: 55
      And also full confidence that no one will dare to "shoot back" smile
      1. +3
        April 26 2023 20: 13
        "Infantil" in this situation beat the crowned relatives in one touch. Separating him from his young wife and exiling her relatives, they wanted to make him a miserable, insignificant little man, make him a laughingstock, the hero of a vulgar anecdote, crush him completely, and N.K. Romanov took it and raised the stakes and the relatives had to give in.
        Kise Vorobyaninov before him as before the moon ...
      2. +1
        April 26 2023 20: 29
        "do not dare" of course he was sure of it
      3. +2
        April 27 2023 00: 14
        But they will put on a straitjacket, and begin to treat.
    3. 0
      April 26 2023 20: 27
      "arrest and destroy" Vysotsky explained: "because there were few violent ones" (c)
  13. VLR
    +2
    April 26 2023 17: 23
    By the way, the next two articles are about Theodore and, accordingly, a little about Justinan. As a continuation of the article "Socialites of Hellas". In my opinion, it turned out not bad, albeit an overview, since a cycle of 10 articles could really turn out there - if in full detail. But, I'm afraid, this detail would go to the detriment of readability.
  14. +2
    April 26 2023 18: 05
    Valery, and other children of Nikolai Konstantinovich, what is known about them
    1. VLR
      +2
      April 26 2023 18: 40
      The younger brother and guardian of Nicholas is the poet of the Silver Age K. R. Sister Olga is the Queen of Greece. Others didn't get famous.
  15. +3
    April 26 2023 18: 35
    Thanks to the author for the article - he raised an interesting topic.
    But.
    1. Is graduating from the General Staff Academy at the age of 18 a sign of infantilism?
    2. As written in the diaries of N.K. , kindly cited in Mother Teresa's (Mother Teresa's) comment April 24, 2023 19:11 pm to the first part of the article - he reacted sharply to the immoral events in his own family, and the "stealing" of diamonds from the salary of the icon blessing the marriage of his parents was more of an act of protest against their behaviour. It was this attitude that he was not forgiven for.
    3. He was sent to hell in the middle of nowhere, but
    But at the same time, the Grand Duke continued to act weird, constantly giving rise to gossip and extremely annoying his relatives in St. Petersburg with his extravagant, and often simply scandalous antics.
    - removed from sight, but vigilantly followed and immediately spread the emerging "compromising evidence" on him in St. Petersburg.
    Am I the only one experiencing cognitive dissonance from this?
    4. The conclusion of the doctors speaks of a “moral” illness, despite the fact that more “advanced” things were happening in the aristocratic environment of that time, and they didn’t particularly shock anyone.
    5. An attempt to sew on "infantilism" to a person involved in large infrastructure projects, as they would say now, looks, to put it mildly, doubtful.
    From all this, one can conclude about the pretension, but not the author of the article - of course not - the pretentiousness of the sources, under the influence of which the author probably fell.
    1. VLR
      0
      April 27 2023 06: 51
      You are confusing abilities and features of mental status. N. K. Romanov, by virtue of his nature, was simply not able to adequately evaluate his actions, did not understand the consequences of his actions, and did not care in the least about
      such "little things" as the honor and dignity of his family. He was engaged in infrastructure projects in Central Asia not as a manager, but as an accountant simply by signing checks. And, in general, just out of boredom - if he had the opportunity to go to Paris or Monte Carlo, you can be sure that he would have found another Fanny Lear, who would have taken him in her arms, like this dexterous American, and would have milked him from him all the money. So soon I would have to steal from my parents again.
      1. 0
        April 27 2023 15: 49
        You confuse abilities and features of mental status

        - Can you draw a line between these two concepts?
        Any abilities depend precisely on the "peculiarities of the mental status."
        In my opinion, the tragedy of this outstanding person is that before the October Revolution they saw him as a competitor for power and the throne, and after his death, his legacy in Central Asia was unprofitable to notice as an alternative to the socialist development of the region.
        The memory of him still suffers - as a result of the lack of forces interested in restoring his good name.
        Now maybe. a new stimulus to discredit it is the "growth of national self-awareness" in the post-Soviet republics.
        As for the diagnosis of "moral insanity" - it is as pompous as it is unscientific. However, such a "diagnosis" today can be put to half of the politicians, which allegorically is being done now in the information war raging all over the world.
        1. -2
          April 27 2023 16: 12
          Which competitor for the throne? What are you? And it wasn't close. Even the father admitted his son's guilt. And authoritative psychiatrists recognized the prince as incompetent.
          1. 0
            April 27 2023 20: 36
            That's it .. Authoritative psychiatrists recognized him as incompetent - and he proved the opposite with his deeds. No wonder the main claims against him were in the field of "morality" - a very subjective criterion.
            If he were not from the Romanov family, they would simply turn a blind eye to his "art".
        2. VLR
          +2
          April 27 2023 17: 39
          I will probably answer you about abilities and mental status - using the example of Mikhail Vrubel. He is a great artist, that's an ability. But he developed schizophrenia - it's a mental status. The disease destroyed him - both as a person, and as an artist, and his last work - a portrait of Bryusov, he could not finish.
          The hero of the article had good learning abilities and an "entrepreneurial streak." But it seems that the psychiatrists were right and in mental development he stopped at the level of a teenager. Everyone is talking about this. Especially wedding stories. Indeed, in the Russian Empire, bigamy is not an anecdote, and not even a scandal - a crime. And for the prince - a fun adventure. “If you can’t, but really want to, then you can.” He does not even think about how his wife felt at the same time, and that the two priests deceived by him will be severely punished. No remorse. And it is precisely for adolescence that emotional callousness and rebelliousness towards his own parents are characteristic, whom he constantly disgraces and literally drives into the coffin with his antics inappropriate for his position.
          1. +1
            April 27 2023 20: 51
            Schizophrenia is still a very murky diagnosis, and besides, your example with Vrubel itself devalues ​​it as an argument - artist lost abilities with the development of the disease, but the hero of the article does not.
            His misfortune was in a quarrel with his relatives, his protest about his father's infidelity towards his mother, despite the fact that the very concept of "morganatic marriage" did not appear at all thanks to N.K.
            It turns out that the Romanovs branded in him everything that they themselves suffered, and that is why they were so severe. Nicholas II, by the way, with his loyalty to his wife, was more supportive and tolerant of his fate, giving his wife the nobility, as follows from your own article.
  16. +3
    April 27 2023 11: 13
    His sister, Grand Duchess Vera Konstantinovna, was also a lady with great quirks. Her oddities manifested themselves in childhood, so she was sent abroad to childless relatives so that the family would not be dishonored.
  17. +3
    April 27 2023 13: 16
    There are a few minor inaccuracies in the article, but on the whole everything is correct and entertainingly stated.

    the younger Nicholas died during the Civil War


    The youngest son's name was Alexander Nikolaevich Iskander. The captain of the imperial guard, he fought in WW1, then in the civil war in Turkestan against the Reds, then fought in the Crimea, then emigrated and lived right up to 1957 in France.

    His daughter (nee Natalya Alexandrovna Iskander) remained in Russia with her mother and received the patronymic Nikolaevna from her stepfather, as well as the name Androsova.
  18. +3
    April 27 2023 18: 46
    The people were interesting.
    And I saw the Tashkent Palace...
  19. 0
    April 28 2023 22: 32
    The most curious character in the history of Russia wink
  20. 0
    April 7 2024 09: 02
    The people of NK loved and respected the ideas: republic, down with autocracy, for which he paid, but in exile he showed his talent as an entrepreneur, industrialist, geographer, the city was named after him, which was not renamed under the USSR even after, but even his grave is not left, the main thing is there is information about his reburial after the demolition of St. George's Cathedral in Tashkent, in the archives of the local KGB, but only relatives can make inquiries, but the Romanov house cannot swim...