Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich and the shadow of Pauline Bonaparte

51
Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich and the shadow of Pauline Bonaparte
Grand Duke Nicholas Konstantinovich and Fanny Lear

One of the numerous offspring of the imperial house of the Romanovs was Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich - the first child in the family of the younger brother of Emperor Alexander II, the grandson of Nicholas I and the elder brother of the famous poet of the Silver Age, who signed the initials K. R.

He was born in 1850, in 1868 he entered the Academy of the General Staff, from which he graduated with a silver medal - and became the first representative of the Romanov dynasty to receive a higher education.




N. K. Romanov in his youth

It seemed that this young man, who was born "with a silver spoon in his mouth", was provided with a bright future. However, in history he entered as one of the most scandalous representatives of this dynasty. It was necessary to try very hard to receive an offer to give a member of his clan as a soldier, or send him to hard labor, at a general meeting of the royal family, but Nikolai Konstantinovich easily solved this “problem with an asterisk”.

Life before scandals


So, after graduating from the Academy of the General Staff, Nikolai Konstantinovich went on a trip to Europe, where he made the first acquisitions in his collection of paintings. Returning, at the age of 21, he entered the Guards Cavalry Regiment, becoming the commander of one of the squadrons there. It was then at one of the balls that he met a femme fatale - American dancer Harriet Blackford, who was two years older than him.

This lady, the daughter of a Philadelphia Presbyterian minister, ran away at the age of 16 with a certain Calvin Blackford, and gave birth to a daughter by him, who died at an early age. After moving to Paris, she began her career as a dancer. She performed under the stage name Fanny Lear (this is the name of the heroine of one popular theatrical play at that time). Then she came to Petersburg.


Fanny Lear

So far, there has been nothing special in this regard, since the presence of mistresses (among whom there were many dancers and ballerinas) was a long tradition of men of the Russian imperial family. The same Matilda Kshesinskaya was called "the mistress of the Romanovs." From 1890 to 1894, this ballerina was the mistress of Tsarevich Nicholas (the future Emperor Nicholas II), but before the wedding with Alice of Hesse-Darmstadt, he handed her over to his cousin Sergei Mikhailovich, and he gave her to Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich, who was 6 years younger than this lady . This member of the Romanov dynasty in 1914 shot himself in a duel with a new admirer of Kshesinskaya (who was already over 40 years old) - ballet dancer Pyotr Vladimirov.


Peter Vladimirov, Matilda Kshesinskaya and Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich

Going into exile, Matilda said:

"What am I going to do now, when the new government - the Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies - consists of 2 people?!"

Indeed, a bit too much even for this not too picky person.

However, the American adventuress Fanny Lear very quickly and deftly took Nikolai Konstantinovich into her hands, which worried his parents. And therefore, in 1873, they achieved his appointment to the Russian expeditionary force under the command of K. P. von Kaufmann, who was heading to conquer the Khiva Khanate (its rulers proudly called their state Khorezm).

Khiva campaign of 1873



Khanate of Khiva on the map


Khan of Khiva Seyid-Muhammed-Rahim


Map of the Khiva expedition in 1873


K. P. Kaufman

As part of the Mangyshlak detachment of Colonel Lomakin, Lieutenant Colonel M. D. Skobelev also took part in the Khiva campaign, who, going there, told his friends that he would either be killed or return as a general.

And already during the campaign, Skobelev said to the staff captain Kedrin:

“There are too many authorities in Petersburg, but here, in the sands, I am my own boss. Luck is not caught in the capital, it lives on the battlefields.


Lieutenant Colonel M. Skobelev

Skobelev is not the hero of our article, but let's say that he did not become a general, he received the rank of colonel only in 1874 - after a business trip to Spain, but was awarded the Order of St. George of the 4th degree.

The Khiva Khanate was not a serious opponent, the whole difficulty of this campaign was solely in the difficult conditions of the troops.


N. N. Karazin. Through the dead sands to the Wells of Adam-Krylgan. Khiva campaign of 1873

In Russia, this war was then called “operetta”, because the overly ambitious Lieutenant Colonel M. Skobelev and Major General N. Verevkin, contrary to Kaufman’s strictest order, “took by storm” the already surrendered capital of the Khanate, Khiva, while losing 11 people killed. And at this very time, Kaufman's troops peacefully entered the city from the opposite side. The commander appointed an internal audit of the activities of his subordinates, the members of the commission were inclined to blame Skobelev for this incident, but the investigation was quietly curtailed.


N. N. Karazin. Russian troops enter Khiva

Khan Seid-Muhammed-Rahim retained his power (and his descendants ruled until 1918), but Khorezm became a Russian protectorate, one of the first orders of the Russian authorities was the order to abolish slavery. About 10 slaves, mostly Persians, were immediately freed.


Medal "For the Khiva Campaign", which was awarded to all participants of this expedition, including medical workers, priests and civil officials

I must say that Nikolai Konstantinovich, who was then part of the Kazaly detachment of Colonel Golov, who joined the column that left Tashkent, showed himself from the best side and, upon returning to St. Petersburg, was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir 3rd degree. At the same time, the Grand Duke became seriously interested in the East and even took an active part in the work of the Russian Geographical Society, was elected its honorary member.

New meeting with Fanny Lear


In St. Petersburg, Nikolai Konstantinovich again met with Fanny Lear, with whom he went on another trip to Europe. The couple in love was accompanied by a certain cornet Savin, who was called the lover of the Grand Duke's passion, and he himself modestly called himself "His Highness's personal supplier of prostitutes." By the way, Nicholas himself often said:

“You can have any woman, it all depends on how much you need to give her: five rubles or five million.”

However, this self-confident playboy did not trust his American passion and therefore took a receipt from her with the following content:

“I swear by everything that is sacred to me in the world, never anywhere and with no one to speak or see without the permission of my august sovereign. I undertake faithfully, as a noble American woman, to keep this oath and declare myself, body and soul, the servant of the Russian Grand Duke. Fanny Lear.

In Rome, Nicholas and Fanny Lear saw the famous sculpture by Antonio Canova, which was a nude image of Pauline Borghese (Napoleon Bonaparte's sister), represented as Venus holding an apple in her hand. Nicholas liked this statue so much that he ordered the sculptor Tommaso Solari to make an exact copy of it, but with the face of Fanny Lear.


Sculpture by Antonio Canova


Sculpture by Tommaso Solari

Fortunately, His Highness did not count money, the same Fanny Lear recalled:

“Members of the imperial family do not carry money with them; when shopping, they leave a note in the store, which is paid by the palace office, and therefore they do not know the account of money; bargain for a penny and abandon thousands.

"Blue thief" of the Romanovs


In April 1874, a very unpleasant story happened in the imperial family.

Alexandra Iosifovna, Nikolai's mother, discovered that in the Marble Palace, three large diamonds were missing from the setting of the icon, which Emperor Nicholas I blessed his son Konstantin to marry her. The police were called, and very soon the stones were found in one of the St. Petersburg pawnshops.

It turned out that they were brought there by none other than the adjutant of their son Nikolai, E. P. Varnakhovsky, who stated that he was only fulfilling the order of the Grand Duke. All this caused bad associations with the notorious "Affaire du collier de la reine" of the French Queen Marie Antoinette.

The situation was so scandalous that Emperor Alexander II ordered the chief of the gendarme corps, Count P. Shuvalov, who was called “the second Arakcheev” and even “Peter IV”, to conduct further investigation. Nikolai was interrogated by Shuvalov in the presence of his father (the interrogation lasted 3 hours), he denied everything, but apparently too clumsily and implausibly, because Konstantin Nikolayevich wrote in his diary:

“No remorse, no consciousness, except when denial is no longer possible, and then we had to pull out vein after vein. Bitterness and not a single tear. They conjured with everything that was left to him as a saint, to alleviate the fate ahead of him with sincere repentance and consciousness! Nothing helped!"

The investigation came to an unequivocal conclusion: the diamonds were stolen by Nikolai Konstantinovich, and he planned to spend the proceeds on gifts for the American Fanny Lear.

It is curious that the American Ambassador M. Jewell took a lively part in the fate of Fanny, who sent a letter to the head of the St. Petersburg Police Department Trepov, which said:

“The United States Envoy Plenipotentiary has the honor to announce that this afternoon the police came to the apartment of Mrs. Blackford, an American citizen. The apartment was searched and many things were taken away. Mrs Blackford is under arrest. The messenger hopes that the general will tell him - tonight, if possible - what the police have arrested her for, what crime she is accused of, and where she is at the moment. The messenger does not intend to interfere in the affairs of justice, but he believes that Mrs. Blackford will not be deprived of the due protection of the law.

Trepov replied that

"Mrs. Blackford, with all due care and attention, has been transferred to a place where nothing will be lacking, and where she will be in good health and the best spirits."

After 5 days, the adventurer was expelled from Russia with a ban on re-entry into the territory of the empire. Before that, Fanny Lear was visited by the famous psychiatrist I. M. Balinsky (professor of the Medical and Surgical Academy and a real state adviser), who questioned her about possible mental abnormalities that the Grand Duke had. According to her, he stated that Nikolai demanded to deliver her to him "day and night with screams and screams."

Once in France, the enterprising American quickly wrote and published a memoir entitled "The Romance of an American Woman in Russia", which included the texts of letters addressed to her by Nikolai Konstantinovich. The Russian ambassador managed to get the French government to confiscate the circulation, but it was too late: some of the books had already been sold, excerpts were distributed in copies. And then the whole book was republished in Belgium.

About the scandalous incident at the Marble Palace, Fanny wrote the following:

“Having returned home, I began to calmly go over in my memory the various oddities of Nikolai, to which I had not paid much attention until now. At the same time, I remembered his mania to take various trinkets from my table. When I noticed them disappearing, he returned them to me, saying that he wanted to tease me. But they would have stayed with him if I hadn't remembered. And how did I not think of this before! I didn’t realize that my poor Nikolai was suffering from a terrible disease called kleptomania… why should a person with an income of more than a million francs a year resort to theft?.. I soon learned from my servants that the Grand Duke was arrested by his father, that he was scared annoyed that they put a straitjacket on him, poured cold water on him and even beat him.

And further:

“If such a loss happened in a family of ordinary people, it would be hidden; here, on the contrary, the police were raised to their feet.

However, the members of the medical commission, Professor I. M. Balinsky and the court physician N. F. Zdekauer, did not find “signs of the so-called kleptomania” in Nikolai, explaining his condition as “an obvious hereditary form of insanity”. The fact is that in the Romanov family, the mother of Nikolai Konstantinovich, Grand Duchess Alexandra Iosifovna, was considered not quite normal and “slightly touched”. She was fond of spiritualism, they also talked about Alexandra's nervous attacks, which were often accompanied by hallucinations. A high-ranking patient was treated with quinine and sodium bromide.

The final medical report dated September 12, 1874 stated that, since the case concerned a representative of the ruling dynasty, the final recognition of his abnormal state of health "depends on the Sovereign will of the Sovereign Emperor." It was recommended "to place His Highness in the southern climate of Russia" and to assign "occupational therapy": to give him the management of "an extensive farm where you can engage in beekeeping, sericulture, cattle breeding, and experiments." A curious medical recommendation is the suggestion that a priest be with the patient at all times.

A family council was convened, at which some relatives offered to give Nikolai as a soldier, or exile him to hard labor. However, Alexander II still did not dare to take such radical measures, he also refused a public trial. As a result, Nikolai Konstantinovich was declared mentally ill and forever expelled from St. Petersburg. His name was forbidden to be mentioned in official documents relating to the imperial family, he was deprived of inheritance rights, titles and awards, his name was deleted from the lists of the Horse Life Guards Regiment.

In the next article, we will continue the story of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich, talk about his "treatment", folly, successful business activities and death in 1918. And also about his granddaughter, Natalya Androsova, a motorcycle racer and participant in the Great Patriotic War, who in the second half of the XNUMXth century was very famous in the artistic and literary environment, having been awarded the unofficial title of “Queen of the Old Arbat”.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 24 2023 10: 27
    Skobelev, who storms the city that has surrendered, is, of course, strong. But they say that during his lifetime, many colleagues considered him an exorbitant ambitious man and a "Tashkent", that is, a military man who made a name in wars with obviously weak opponents. During the war with Turkey, he also did not stand out too much. real merits against the background of other generals. But he had a bright talent for self-promotion and charm, which was so great that even an absurd and ridiculous death "riding a courtesan" benefited him, giving rise to speculation about the murder by foreign agents.
    1. +7
      April 24 2023 11: 55
      Quote: vet
      many colleagues considered him an exorbitant ambitious man and "Tashkent", that is, a military man who made a name in wars with obviously weak opponents.

      especially those who cannot be lured into a real war with a roll
      1. +6
        April 24 2023 13: 05
        Here are Mayer's memories of these "colleagues"
        when suddenly someone had an unfortunate idea to remember Mikhail Dmitrievich Skobelev and the Akhal-Teke expedition that had just ended! My Creator, how everyone started up! Five minutes later, having passed through the entire oasis, being in all business, knowing the smallest circumstances of preparation for the expedition and its execution, I received such information from the lips of the assembled generals that I was completely stunned; I could not figure out whether I was in the company of Russians, who, it seems to me, should rejoice at any success of their own weapons, or whether I fell into the society of Germans or Hungarians who hate us, maliciously deny everything that Russia can be proud of. I learned with unusual surprise that the Tekins are the most calm and peaceful people, that the detachment was not in the desert all the time, but in real Eden, that the water there is better than our Neva, that if we wanted, we would take Geok-Tepe without a shot, that our human losses, as well as the recapture of our banner and two guns, were arranged with the intention of showing the enemy’s unprecedented strength, that ... however, why convey to the reader all the fabrications that petty malice and envy can give rise to. The pearl of the whole conversation was a question proposed by one of those present, the future Suvorovs and Napoleons:

        “Uh… that the Tekins… uh… are armed with firearms?”

        To the credit of the rest of the venerable assembly, I must state that the answer was in the affirmative, although the false information was immediately given that most of the guns were matchlocks. The writer of these lines had piles of Teke weapons, but not a single matchlock multuk.

        How the conversation ended, I do not know; in order to avoid spilling bile, I quietly disappeared ... The last words that reached me were: “Fie! Some kind of negligent... Suddenly fireworks, exit in the palace!.. Too much!..»
      2. +2
        April 24 2023 14: 01
        But the term "Tashkent people" was not invented by me. And Skobelev, indeed, did not have to test his strength in the war with the same Germans, Austrians and Japanese. The Tekins are still not the iron divisions of Ludendorff. Skobelev had envious people, but one cannot call their criticism completely unfounded. Skobelev left "at the peak." And if he lived to the Russian-Japanese? Only guess what would be left.
        1. VLR
          +2
          April 24 2023 14: 14
          Without a hint of anything, just a statement; Kuropatkin, who lost to the Japanese, was at one time Skobelev's chief of staff.
        2. +4
          April 24 2023 16: 31
          Quote: vet
          And Skobelev, indeed, did not have to test his strength in the war with the same Germans, Austrians and Japanese.

          His envious people were beaten by the Turks ...
          Quote: vet
          And if he lived to the Russian-Japanese?

          Here, God only knows. Painfully many problems have accumulated in the Russian army since the time of "the best minister of war of all times and peoples" Milyutin, and aggravated by Vannovsky. Frankly, I doubt that one person could turn this situation around. request
          Quote: VlR
          Without a hint of anything, just a statement; Kuropatkin, who lost to the Japanese, was at one time Skobelev's chief of staff.

          Yes, the army was overflowing with his former orderlies and commissioners. The problem is that, without Skobelev, they were worth little by themselves. And Kuropatkin too ... after all, the staff officer and the commander-in-chief have slightly different specializations.
          1. VLR
            +5
            April 24 2023 21: 56
            Curiously, Skobelev was criticized by the well-known and aristocratic General M. Dragomirov. His dispute on this issue with Kuropatkin is described.
            In 1887, 57-year-old Dragomirov, head of the Academy of the General Staff, became friends with a teacher - 39-year-old Kuropatkin, the former chief of staff of Skobelev. Dragomirov said:
            "Why are you all rushing about with your Skobelev as with a written bag: he is just a charlatan."
            Kuropatkin replied: "Slava Skobelev haunts you even now that Skobelev is in the grave."
            By the way, from Dragomirov, Repin painted the ataman Ivan Serko in the painting “Cossacks” (they write a letter to the Sultan).
            And Dragomirov was a teacher of the future Nicholas II and left the following review about him:
            "He is fit to sit on the throne, but he is not capable of standing at the head of Russia."
            1. +1
              April 25 2023 13: 56
              Quote: VlR
              And Dragomirov was a teacher of the future Nicholas II and left the following review about him:

              Dragomirov was, of course, a witty man, but as a military theorist by the beginning of the XNUMXth century, he was a little more than completely outdated. In any case, officers in the Manchurian army spoke of his tactical instructions ... to put it mildly, extremely uncomplimentary.
              Quote: VlR
              "Why are you all rushing about with your Skobelev as with a written bag: he is just a charlatan."

              Well, by the way, Dragomirov spoke out against mitrailleuses, and then against machine guns, but the "charlatan" Skobelev knew how to use this new type of weapon.
              Quote: VlR
              By the way, from Dragomirov, Repin painted the ataman Ivan Serko in the painting “Cossacks” (they write a letter to the Sultan).

              Having a textured appearance for a Russian military leader is a matter of prime necessity!
            2. +3
              April 25 2023 16: 47
              Valery, just from the fact that Dragomirov did not respectfully speak of Nikolai "henpecked", it is not yet a fact that he is right in everything. All the same, Skobelev was a bright personality. Although he did not graduate from the Academy of the General Staff
              1. VLR
                +1
                April 25 2023 17: 15
                I simply reported on the struggle of groups in the Russian army, where there were ardent supporters of Skobelev and his opponents-ill-wishers.
                1. 0
                  April 25 2023 18: 13
                  Valery, I'm sorry, but you don't like Skobelev?
                  1. VLR
                    +3
                    April 25 2023 18: 55
                    Normally, I treat him. Without puppy enthusiasm, but without any hostility. Objectively. And why did I get the impression that I didn't like it? Because of the Dragomirov post? So I already explained that I brought him in to explain: there were different attitudes towards him in the army. The people loved him, of course. He impressed with his somewhat theatrical behavior - a fearless "white general" on a white horse.
        3. 0
          April 24 2023 19: 54
          Vet if there is no mind, you read the term Tashkenters, then you are an authority? And Skobelev is so shit?
  2. +3
    April 24 2023 12: 19
    This member of the Romanov dynasty in 2014 shot himself in a duel with a new admirer of Kshesinskaya
    Already in 2014, cool, you can’t say anything.
    1. VLR
      +4
      April 24 2023 12: 28
      I hope you understand that this is a typo? Of course, 1914. Thanks for finding it, we'll fix it.
  3. +7
    April 24 2023 12: 20
    As for me, a very biased and one-sided article!
    So let's try to look at the situation from the other side. After the unsuccessful Crimean War, the newly enthroned Emperor Alexander II was forced to start reforms. And one of his main assistants and advisers in this field was his brother Konstantin. Moreover, Grand Duke Konstantin Nikolayevich was a much more consistent and radical politician. For example, he believed that the peasants should be freed without ransom. Is it any wonder that he had many enemies among the serf-owners.
    But that is not all. The Romanov family had not yet grown very much and all its representatives quickly found a warm place. Including the younger brothers of Alexander and Konstantin - Nikolai Nikolaevich the Elder (future commander-in-chief in the Russian-Turkish war) and Mikhail Nikolaevich (General feldzeugmeister and future governor in the Caucasus), despite the fact that they did not possess special military talents. However, you can’t call them outright fools either.
    And now, the son of the hated reformer Constantine suddenly begins, as they say, to show promise. He does not enjoy the privileges due to his birth, but he himself brilliantly graduates from the Academy of the General Staff. And where would you order him to be so smart? After all, he can move all the crowned relatives ...
    And all of a sudden, jewelry disappears, and not from a distant casket (but the jewelry of the Romanovs is like a fool of shag !!!), but from the salary of a particularly revered and therefore visible icon!
    It's up to you, dear author, if you want to consider the Grand Duke a thief - consider it!
    But don't call him an idiot!!!
    Then, during the search, he has a much larger amount in his desk, which was allegedly obtained for jewelry. Nobody is interested in this. Stole it and that's it!
    Beauty! A very promising member of a rival clan was removed with one blow, and the scandal, of course, weakened the position of the father.

    P.S. Grand Duke Sergei Mikhailovich was our last tsar not a cousin, but a cousin!
    1. VLR
      +2
      April 24 2023 12: 36
      Perhaps there were some intrigues around his father, but N.K. Romanov was still not quite normal, at least a pronounced psychopath and sociopath, which will be discussed in the next article. Yes, and highly respected doctors examined him and delivered a verdict. They should not be suspected of wanting to flatter the emperor. And none of them received any awards or preferences after the diagnosis.
      1. +4
        April 24 2023 12: 49
        Quote: VlR
        however, N.K. Romanov was still not quite normal, at least a pronounced psychopath and sociopath, which will be discussed in the next article.

        After what was done to him? When, even before the end of the investigation, he was kept with the lower ranks, who insulted and beat him?
        You know, no wonder!
        Yes, and highly respected doctors examined him and delivered a verdict. They should not be suspected of wanting to flatter the emperor.

        And what about the emperor? Nikolai could not claim his place, which you can’t say about the same “Field Marshal Chislov”
        Quote: VlR
        And none of them received any awards or preferences after the diagnosis.

        How to know, how to know ...
        But Fani was released from the country ... the only thing is that I don’t know the fate of Vanakhovsky. But it seems like he didn’t go to hard labor?
      2. 0
        April 24 2023 13: 10
        Quote: VlR
        Perhaps there were some intrigues around his father, but N.K. Romanov was still not quite normal, at least a pronounced psychopath

        I agree with you completely, and he was a rare bastard, he had to rot in hard labor.
        1. +7
          April 24 2023 14: 13
          Quote: bober1982
          he was a rare bastard, he had to rot in hard labor.

          what It's strange, but the Russian settlers who lived in the Hungry Steppe were ready to carry him in their arms ..... I wonder what the bastard was in him?
        2. +5
          April 24 2023 19: 39
          Nikolai Konstantinovich wrote: “My desire is to revive the deserts of Central Asia and make it easier for the government to settle them with Russian people of all classes.” By 1913, thanks to the active efforts of Nikolai Konstantinovich, more than 119 Russian settlements appeared on this territory.
        3. +3
          April 25 2023 13: 29
          "Rare bastard" just because he is from the Romanov dynasty?
    2. +4
      April 24 2023 19: 11
      Indeed, it is a very strange thing.
      Nikolai Konstantinovich was a black sheep in the family. He could easily recite Hugo’s poems in front of everyone: “We don’t bow to the king and don’t put God in a penny!” He did not have any respect for Alexander II, the maid of honor Maria von Keller stated that Russia should become a republic.
      At the age of 18, he was already a captain and the first man from the royal family to graduate from a prestigious military school.
      He showed himself excellently in the war, General Kaufman, who became the governor of the Turkestan region, invited him on an expedition to explore the Amu Darya River. A career on the rise a little more and he will leave the capital. And here is a very timely theft.
      The police generally did not have the right to conduct an inquiry and conduct an investigation in relation to the persons of the royal dynasty. And the case would undoubtedly have been hushed up, but then the chief of the gendarme corps, Count P. A. Shuvalov, appeared. According to rumors, a conversation took place between Prince Konstantin Nikolayevich and Shuvalov in raised tones, after which P. A. Shuvalov personally reports on the case to Alexander II. The only proof is the testimony of the adjutant. Alexander II is furious, one confession is expected from the young prince. Again, according to rumors, it was the emperor who called Nikolai Konstantinovich crazy. And instructed to treat him like crazy. “Fanny wrote in her memoirs that before being taken away from the capital, the Grand Duke was kept in a straitjacket, pumped up with medicines and even beaten. The soldiers who guarded Nikola, with plebeian joy to show off over someone who was still inaccessible to them yesterday, offered the arrested child toys. " "In 1917, a translation of Fanny Lear's memoirs appeared in the Argus magazine, where she talked about her august novel, the bitter fate of Nikola, in whose guilt she did not believe for a minute, and also about how her trip to Russia ended." Sister Olga Konstantinovna always said that her brother could not do this and the only one who did not turn away from him. Although relations in the family were strained “When I was twenty, I suddenly realized that I had no family. The Marble Palace became hateful to me. Okay, I decided, I'll find myself another family. I met a princess at that time, I wanted to marry her, it did not work out. Then I set off in search of love, looking for it among St. Petersburg women. From the search, I fell ill, and almost died. Finally, I met Fanny, a kindred spirit, both intelligent and loving. It was her, my only one, the one I was looking for for so long! ... We have been together for more than a year! God grant that our happiness does not end!”. The father started a new family with the ballerina Anna Kuznetsova, mother Alexandra Iosifovna accused her son that because of his debauchery, her husband left the family. So do not be surprised by the words of the father about his son. The family doctor testified that Nicola was incredibly sensitive to the collapse of the family. His homelessness sometimes resulted in violent acts, when he was ready to destroy everything around him, and then wept bitterly like a child from longing and impotence. Internally, constantly ready to fight back, he became more and more distrustful of people, especially those who were unloved by him could experience his aggressiveness and bitterness. The son did not communicate with his mother, according to rumors, he did not call her anything other than a fool, and the possibility of being in her private chambers to steal diamonds is minimal. He had money, kleptomaniacs steal whole things and exclusively for themselves. Nikloy Konstantinovich did not break down, he achieved a lot, he does not pull on a psychopath.
      This story also has a continuation. The adventurer and fraudster Cornet Savin in Paris began to tell that he was the adjutant of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich, and the stolen diamonds from the icon were pawned for a million rubles and the money went to the revolution. Prince Nikolai personally met with Sophia Perovskaya and gave her this money to prepare a terrorist act against Alexander II.
      Clearly, one thing could have been put on the brakes, but they made it public and a madman appeared to protect the honor of the family, and this is not a lifetime. Moreover, the descendants will not be able to claim anything.
  4. +2
    April 24 2023 13: 22
    In the next article, we will continue the story of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich, talk about his "treatment", folly, successful business activities and death in 1918.
    A madcap and a successful entrepreneur, entrepreneurship, how is it another folly? smile
    1. VLR
      +2
      April 24 2023 13: 42
      You see, he was given such money to "feed" that he could spend it without really thinking about profit or loss. But, to be honest, I spent it not on trifles, but on quite necessary and useful things. Some investments in cotton growing are worth something. But he didn't forget to open a brothel (in a Muslim country!) either. All enterprises were recorded on the wife. Perhaps she was not a screen, like modern officials, but a full-fledged companion and even a "generator of ideas"? Photo workshops, for example, could be the brainchild of a frivolous prince, and the organization of numerous markets - this woman?
      1. +3
        April 24 2023 14: 14
        Quote: VlR
        in a Muslim country!

        what What Muslim country is this?
        1. VLR
          0
          April 24 2023 14: 39
          In Central Asia, not a single khanate or emirate was abolished. Only vassalage.
          1. +3
            April 25 2023 07: 51
            Quote: VlR
            Only vassalage

            what Do you consider Tashkent a vassalage???
          2. +1
            April 26 2023 00: 25
            Why is this? Wasn't the Kokand Khanate abolished? There was the Turkestan Governor-General, which was part of the empire, and there were vassals of the Emirate of Bukhara and the Khanate of Khiva.
      2. +8
        April 24 2023 14: 27
        Yep, crazy. He paved the streets, a theater, built a club, a hospital for the poor, an almshouse, a circus in Tashkent, and even a brothel. This, a madman, published a work where he proved that the Amu Darya repeatedly changed its direction, not independently, but solely by the will of man. Well, maybe someone wrote this work for him. From a not great mind and folly, he built cotton ginning plants. As a result of his entrepreneurial activity, he had an income of 1 million rubles, plus the yard allocated him 5 thousand a year for maintenance. laughing You know, if you don’t like the character of your article, you don’t write objectively. And if you like it, you smear it with honey, and the bees flock. You are silent, you are exaggerating. Undoubtedly, you did not start your entrepreneurial activity with apples. You sold one, bought four with the proceeds, and so on. He had a lot of "jokers" up his sleeve. I agree with the commentator "Senior Sailor", the article is tendentious and one-sided.
        1. VLR
          +2
          April 24 2023 14: 37
          So we have not yet reached the Turkestan exile and the activities of N.K.R. there, and you, not knowing what exactly will happen next, are already "hanging up labels."
          1. -1
            April 24 2023 15: 26
            Yes, of course, I hang laughing You are also a big fan, hang labels
            1. +3
              April 25 2023 12: 10
              "You, same big lover" both quits
        2. +3
          April 24 2023 19: 20
          I will add. During the construction work on laying the canal, Nikolai Konstantinovich carried out an archaeological study of an ancient Turkic mound located near the channel of the canal, from which weapons and household items were removed, which became priceless exhibits in his personal collection. In 1886, he embarked on his most ambitious project in Central Asia - laying a canal from the Syr Darya River to irrigate a part of the Hungry Steppe between Tashkent and Dzhizak, at the same time expending a lot of energy and personal funds. The work related to the conduct and construction of the canal cost Nikolai Konstantinovich over a million rubles, but were crowned with great success. After the construction was completed, on a coastal rock near the river, near one of the new Russian villages, the workers carved a large letter “H”, crowned with a crown. Twelve large settlements were founded on irrigated lands for Russian settlers from the central regions of Russia. Nikolai Konstantinovich wrote: “My desire is to revive the deserts of Central Asia and make it easier for the government to settle them with Russian people of all classes.” By 1913, thanks to the active efforts of Nikolai Konstantinovich, more than 119 Russian settlements appeared on this territory.
        3. 0
          April 25 2023 12: 14
          "Susbrod" theoretically: a madcap could well do this
        4. -2
          April 25 2023 18: 22
          Alexey, I almost agree here: Valery, whoever he likes, "you smear with honey"
      3. +2
        April 25 2023 13: 25
        "" all enterprises are registered to my wife" I have a woman's question: how did Nikolai Konstantinovich live with his wife, after an American, did they have children? All the same, there was a stormy romance with a dancer, and then: hello, old wife. just realized that you are a beautiful woman?
        1. +2
          April 25 2023 14: 06
          Quote from lisikat2
          All the same, there was a stormy romance with a dancer, and then: hello, old wife.

          He did not have a wife before having an affair with Fanny Lear.
          After marriage with Nadezhda von Dreher. she and her offspring were given the title of princes Iskander. Another parallel marriage with the Cossack Daria Chasovitina.
          Three children from each wife and two more illegitimate.
  5. VLR
    +2
    April 24 2023 14: 46
    Oh, by the way, I almost always start to feel sympathy for the character I write about and start looking for something good to say about him. Just about some good things can be said a lot, but about others - little.
    1. +2
      April 24 2023 15: 27
      I almost always start to feel sympathy for the character
      Yes, lan, don't be ridiculous.
    2. -2
      April 25 2023 18: 25
      "almost always" but not this time .,
  6. +2
    April 25 2023 11: 13
    Colleagues, Valery good afternoon.
    I no longer hoped for interesting material on history
  7. +2
    April 25 2023 11: 30
    In the next article, we will continue the story of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich, talk about his "treatment", extravagances, successful business

    If I'm not mistaken, the hero of the article is one of the founders of the Golden Horde office - the first cotton producer in Russia in industrial quantities.
    Thanks to the author for the interesting topic!
  8. +3
    April 25 2023 12: 07
    All good day.
    Valery, I missed you, but out of harm, The story of the duel between Alexander Mikhailovich and the ballet dancer is not needed here.
    You, talk about Nikolai Konstantinovich, and not Kshesinskaya and her "cupids"
  9. +2
    April 25 2023 13: 13
    "Imperial family" like only the Romanovs, were fans of ballerinas?
    I don’t know how talented Fanny Lear was, but Matilda Kshesinskaya was a talented dancer
    1. +1
      April 25 2023 17: 46
      "talented dancer" I would say: hardy. The first, from the Russian dancers, performed 32 fouette turns on her toes. Could: "buzz" until late at night, and in the morning a rehearsal and until complete exhaustion
      1. +1
        April 25 2023 18: 36
        Vlad2, You, rudely, but rightly said: not everyone can do it. Possibly great willpower. More precise definition.
        Do not sleep at night, and rehearsal in the morning
    2. +4
      April 25 2023 21: 28
      In fact, the biography of Fani Lear is dark and vague, like her adventures. According to other sources, her name was Henrietta (abbreviated as Getty) Blackford. And she met Nikolai not at all in Paris, but in St. Petersburg. This was told in his book about Nikolai Konstantinovich by his distant relative, Prince Michael of Greece. According to him, when Alexander II found out about the scandalous adventures of his nephew with an American (which we will discuss below), he instructed the secret police to compile a dossier on her. Here's what we found out. Her real name was Getty Ailey. She was born in Philadelphia to a Puritan family. By his first marriage he was married to a rich and pious woman and had five daughters by her. The pastor's wife died, and he remarried, already an old man, to a woman of dubious origin. It was from this marriage that the Getty was born. Mr. Ailey's older children, because of this marriage, did not want to know either their father or their half-sister, despising her low birth. She grew up in poverty and oblivion.
      At sixteen, Miss Henrietta Ailey ran away with a certain Calvin Blackford and married him.
      They had a child. The kid soon died, and the husband followed him to the grave - he turned out to be a consumptive patient, and also a bitter drunkard. However, Getty by that time had already managed to leave him. She got a job in a Philadelphia bank, but left the service in it, having got herself a rich lover - the Mexican Madison. He was a womanizer and a reveler. Getty demanded that he marry her, but in vain. Then she, as a consolation to herself, got a bunch of gentlemen. Having saved some money, she opened a casino. Money flowed to her like a river. In addition, she was engaged in usury and lent money to fools who lost to the nines and ashes, so that later on for her “good deed” they would peel them like sticky.
      In addition, Getty took up self-education. While her lovers and admirers played whist, she read English and French poets in the original. It was another challenge to society - in America it was believed that a woman of low birth, and even a whore, could not read Victor Hugo or Alfred Tennyson there. This was considered the privilege of pious matrons. And these matrons declared a boycott of their husbands and sons who visited the Getty Casino. Her clientele dwindled, her admirers left her; having sold the casino, Getty drove off to Paris.
      In the capital of France, she met a fellow countrywoman - the famous courtesan and singer Cora Pearl. She taught her the subtle art of seduction. Getty called herself Fanny Lear, met Parisian aristocratic revelers ... and continued to educate herself. Her greatest achievement as a "lady of the camellias" was a short-term relationship with the Prince of Wales, the future King Edward VII, who was famous throughout Europe for his incredible lover of women. Then material success came - her sponsor was the crown prince of the Prussian royal family of Hohenzollern Max of Baden-Baden. The future king behaved like a king: when parting with the Getty, he provided for her and created her the glory of the first courtesan of Paris. She handled both very well. The money went to buy a mansion on Maleb Boulevard, and fame went to the arrangement of a secular salon. Great people, poets and writers often visited her. Among others, Dumas the father and Dumas the son were in her salon.
      But the year 1870 struck - the Paris Commune and the defeat of France by the Prussians. Everything went to dust - Fanny Lear lost money, salon, society and connections. Fanny could not leave Paris dear to her heart. During the war, she suffered hardships, during the siege she ate rat pate and dog steaks. Everything would be fine, but Fanny suffered from a lack of noble and wealthy admirers. I had to leave the place and go no one knows where. All the same Cora Pearl advised her to go to Russia. “They like a French girl who fails better than a Russian princess. In addition, they have some special attraction to prostitutes, ”she said bluntly. So Fanny Lear ended up in St. Petersburg in search of a rich simpleton, whom she found in the person of Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich.
  10. 0
    April 26 2023 16: 58
    was born in 1850, in 1868 he entered the Academy of the General Staff, from which he graduated with a silver medal - and became the first representative of the Romanov dynasty to receive a higher education.
    ...after graduating from the Academy of the General Staff, Nikolai Konstantinovich went on a trip to Europe, where he made the first acquisitions in his collection of paintings. Returning, at the age of 21 he entered the Guards Cavalry Regiment

    How long did he study at the General Staff Academy? Year, two?
  11. 0
    9 June 2023 19: 33
    GRAND DUKE - NICHOLAS KONSTANTINOVICH!!!. there is a feeling that there was no revolution of 1917, there was no Soviet power that liberated Russia from tsarist oppression. I just want to fall on my knees in front of the face of St. Nicholas the Second, crumple my hat with earflaps, brush off a tear from an unkempt beard and hit myself in the forehead with a peasant's fist with pleas for the forgiveness of our grave sins. It seems to me that these bourgeois articles are preparing the people's opinion again for the Tsar, the Most Holy Emperor ....... so that he rules with his royal hand, and we were serfs before him. They put the king against the wall, and his henchmen fled to Paris. And it is still unknown what would have happened to Russia if they had remained in power. The world of capitalism is a world of competition. tsarism is the stagnation of power and the complete absence of competition. And where there is no competition, there is a swamp, devastation and stagnation. Which I have already observed for the last 23 years. there are no cars of their own, no civilian planes, no microcircuits, no TVs, etc., etc., either. only vodka tobacco, news about Ukraine and ice dancing. prmerno as one disgusting German bequeathed.
  12. 0
    April 6 2024 22: 03
    There was such a Grand Duke Nikolai Konstantinovich, he accepted the revolution, raised a red flag over his palace, the only one of the Romanovs who received the highest military service, he fought in campaigns, military orders, ideas: the republic, down with autocracy, for which he paid, but he also found himself in exile, not strong talent in all fields, entrepreneur, industrialist, geographer, philanthropist, people loved and respected him, for his services the city was named in his honor and was not renamed either during the USSR or now.