Not the feminine face of war

19
Female memory covers the continent of human feelings in war, which usually eludes male attention.
Svetlana Alexievich, “The war has no female face”























Not the feminine face of war




















19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lech e-mine
    +2
    1 December 2012 09: 41
    Very interesting photos - I haven’t seen them anywhere.
    1. orfo
      +1
      1 December 2012 19: 30
      http://aquatek-filips.livejournal.com/453929.html
      looking out for some girls with "historical" photos
  2. Sibiryakus orthodoxy
    +7
    1 December 2012 09: 56
    These are modern photos installed under the war.
    But still a good job.
  3. +2
    1 December 2012 11: 37
    If these photos are installed, then I admire the work of the artist-photographer!
    But really, the war does not have a female face!
  4. 0
    1 December 2012 12: 27
    As I understand it, a photo from the book of the same name. But why the installation?
  5. Brother Sarych
    +5
    1 December 2012 14: 14
    It’s immediately clear that the installation - and why? Are there really few genuine photographs? Or are they unworthy of another publication?
    Faces are not those, not at all and it hurts the eye ...
    1. 0
      2 December 2012 22: 38
      Actually, it’s not like installation.
      But despicable pictures. Taman Brigade!
    2. 0
      2 December 2012 23: 44
      Where, specifically, the installation. Where the women pull the wire? Or where does the sniper work?
      1. Brother Sarych
        0
        3 December 2012 00: 22
        These are all artificially aged photographs - all installations ...
      2. +1
        3 December 2012 10: 35
        The girl in the form of a waffen-SS is definitely modern, I met her.
  6. 0
    1 December 2012 17: 27
    great photos, interesting processing. I like it.
  7. 0
    1 December 2012 21: 51
    These, in my opinion, are reenactors. And the photos themselves are artificially aged .....
  8. newFeofan
    +1
    1 December 2012 23: 26
    Rumor has it that women did not serve in the SS.
    1. 0
      2 December 2012 18: 37
      The Germans did not have women in the combat units. But in the auxiliary units there were many.
  9. +2
    2 December 2012 01: 01
    Yes, while I looked, many photos seemed somehow ... not real, or something. Well, if reconstruction, then it’s understandable. It is clear why girls in quilted jackets are so much reminiscent of current students in geological practice :) The spirit of the times cannot be hidden by aging photographs ... Although photos 11,12 and 13 above are very similar to military ones ...
    Otherwise, from an artistic point of view - great photos!
    1. +1
      2 December 2012 22: 43
      Brother, I agree with you, but I can’t post pictures, notice the real ones. (How can I post multiple photos at once? The moderator does not help.)
  10. +2
    2 December 2012 22: 37
    Installation, not installation .... I didn’t notice, but maybe. Guys, there were so many people who fought in that war that I won’t be surprised at anything! So many things happened! I wonder at the women snipers! Finding out a hundred chances for the war is cool! Take an interest .
  11. -4
    3 December 2012 05: 32
    ALL war photos are LONG-LONG published. The "novelty" of the data is highly questionable. In ALL authentic photographs, the exhaustion of faces MUCH MUCH exceeds the fatness of the faces of this series !!!

    I DO NOT BELIEVE!!!
  12. smershspy
    +3
    April 22 2013 12: 33
    Quote: Brother Sarych
    It’s immediately clear that the installation - and why? Are there really few genuine photographs? Or are they unworthy of another publication?
    Faces are not those, not at all and it hurts the eye ...


    I agree! Could not find photos! Amazing