Airstrike on the bridge across the Sudost River in the Chernihiv region hit the frame

106
Airstrike on the bridge across the Sudost River in the Chernihiv region hit the frame

The network published footage of an airstrike of the Russian Aerospace Forces on the bridge over the Sudost River near the village of Gremyach in the Chernihiv region of Ukraine. The pilots of the Western Military District on the Su-34 accurately hit the above infrastructure facility. As a result of the fire damage, the bridge received significant damage.

The bridge across the river in the territory occupied by the enemy was destroyed in order to counteract its use by sabotage and reconnaissance groups of the main department of Ukrainian military intelligence to penetrate the territory of the Russian Federation and attack the settlements of the Bryansk region.




Presumably, the attack on the Ukrainian infrastructure facility in the Chernihiv region was carried out using a FAB-500M62 air bomb equipped with a planning and correction module (UMPC).

In the video, you can see that the bomb hit the edge of the bridge bed next to one of the pillars. Based on this, most likely, the object suffered significant damage.


Russian Aerospace Forces are increasingly using air bombs equipped with flight correction modules in the special operation zone in Ukraine, which allows aircraft to strike without entering the enemy’s air defense coverage area.

Air bombs equipped with UMPC are also successfully used to destroy Ukrainian air defense systems. The experience gained during the special operation made it possible to significantly increase the accuracy of hitting targets with both air bombs from the UMPC and various types of missiles.
106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    April 9 2023 16: 55
    We can, it turns out. That's how it would be on all bridges ...
    1. +30
      April 9 2023 17: 15
      Finally! We realized that bridges in the hands of Ukrobanderites are harmful.

      and - we can, when we want.
      1. +4
        April 9 2023 19: 30
        It seems like they hit the center of the bridge. Watched in slow motion.
        1. +3
          April 9 2023 21: 06
          Quote: Terenin
          It seems like they hit the center of the bridge. Watched in slow motion.

          No, to the end.

    2. +3
      April 9 2023 22: 13
      Quote from Sancheas
      That's how it would be on all bridges ...

      Not all bridges are within 3.5 km. from the border.
  2. +20
    April 9 2023 16: 55
    was inflicted with the FAB-500M62 bomb

    X-29
    1. +18
      April 9 2023 17: 01
      We should add. And not only there. We need to mine the border, what else can be done there?
      1. +17
        April 9 2023 17: 42
        You can't mine the border. It is necessary to mine the border of the security zone far in the depths of Ukraine, adjacent to the desired line of the new border of the Russian Federation.
        1. +7
          April 9 2023 18: 09
          The question is, where is this desired line of the new border? For me, far beyond the Dnieper and Ingul. But what do they think there, at the top?
          1. +2
            April 9 2023 18: 35
            Quote from: dmi.pris1
            The question is, where is this desired line of the new border? For me, far beyond the Dnieper and Ingul. But what do they think there, at the top?

            The question is not only where the border is, but also with whom. With Poland along the lines of 1945 or 1939? Or maybe with Germany along the 1914 line?
            1. +3
              April 9 2023 21: 02
              Quote: Nagan
              The question is not only where the border is, but also with whom. With Poland along the lines of 1945 or 1939? Or maybe with Germany along the 1914 line?
              If the Poles introduce their regular military units in order to annex part of the territories of the former Ukraine, then the 1914 border suggests itself.
          2. +4
            April 9 2023 19: 48
            Quote from: dmi.pris1
            We need to mine the border

            Quote: Roma-1977
            You can't mine the border. It is necessary to mine the border of the security zone far in the depths of Ukraine,

            That's right, colleagues, only it is not the border that is being mined, but the paths of the probable passage of the DRG, according to intelligence, to the depth of the enemy up to 15 km., As well as setting up ambushes there.
            1. +1
              April 10 2023 08: 44
              Apparently, the service was in the PV or not?
    2. 0
      April 9 2023 19: 39
      Quote: Pulkovo1942
      X-29

      Doesn't look much like her

  3. +22
    April 9 2023 16: 58
    FighteBomber says this is the result. But he claims that X-29TD was used. The second part did not collapse completely, but failed. The infantry will pass, but the equipment will no longer pass.

    Definitely need to repeat and finish.
    1. +13
      April 9 2023 17: 06
      X29TD - "far hand" Su34. X29TD is a solid-propellant air-to-surface missile with a television guidance system. The missile operates on the principle of "fire and forget" and is designed to destroy stationary objects.

      Modification Kh29TD, despite similar dimensions, has a significantly increased range (especially if used in the "hill" mode) compared to its predecessors. Modernization of the rocket design, as well as the software implementation of new flight modes, made it possible to increase the launch range to 30-40+ km. Prior to the start of "SVO", there was no documentary confirmation of the implementation of such ranges for this type of missile. Exclusive shots of the use of these products were presented.
      Photo 4. Start (presumably) Kh29TD at a distance of 20 km.
      Photo 5,6,7 ... presumably an image from the television head of the Kh29TD Tubus-2 missile before launch (or the Platan Su34 sighting system). SUV The SU34 weapons control system with the “PR” index indicates the possibility of launching at a target at a distance of 30+ km.
      The possibility of carrying out the BP of the Kh29TD rocket at a distance of more than 30+ km has been proven (the range varies depending on the flight conditions of the carrier).

      https://m.vk.com/wall-123538639_2715267

      FAB-1500 with UMPC, in my opinion, would be more effective in this case.
      Cheaper and more powerful. Or if you need TV guidance, then you can use KAB-1500 with TV guidance.


      KAB-1500 is an adjustable air bomb weighing 1500 kg and laser / television homing, capable of penetrating 3 meters of reinforced concrete or 20 meters of earth. on the water. A bomb weighing 1500 kilograms is capable of destroying reinforced concrete structures, as well as damaging enemy equipment and manpower. The same 30 km launch to the target as the Kh-1500TD, but at the same time 30 kg of TNT against 29 kg for the Kh-1000TD.
      1. +5
        April 9 2023 17: 21
        FAB-1500 with UMPC, in my opinion, would be more effective in this case.
        UMPC does not have such accuracy, QUO is much larger
        1. +1
          April 9 2023 21: 39
          In the Chechen company, we hit the bridges (at least one case was remembered from the news release) Su-24 with the help of two KAB-1500L. KVO 4 meters. In terms of cost, in comparison with the X-29, I will not say anything.
      2. +1
        April 9 2023 23: 06
        Yeah. 1500 is not necessarily even an exact hit. Even if a bridge dies nearby, if it stands, it will still not be reliable for travel
      3. -6
        April 10 2023 00: 07
        The same 30 km launch to the target as the Kh-29TD, but at the same time 1000 kg of TNT versus 320 kg for the Kh-29TD.

        Wikipedia and quotes from it is good.
        Question: are there these CABs on the APU of the aviation of the RF Armed Forces?
        I doubt it though. Kozhugetism in one word
    2. -27
      April 9 2023 17: 12
      If a missile capable of sinking 10000 ton ships is such a "zilch", then how are you going to destroy bridges across the Dnieper?
      1. +16
        April 9 2023 17: 35
        If a missile capable of sinking 10000 ton ships is such a "zilch", then how are you going to destroy bridges across the Dnieper?

        I’ll tell you a secret, can you imagine spending more than one rocket on a bridge? And you can put a few dozen bombs and only the base will remain of the bridge, incredible, right?
        1. -3
          April 9 2023 22: 17
          Quote: spektr9
          I'll tell you a secret

          Also in secret: not every attack aircraft will reach the middle of the Dnieper ..
          1. +2
            April 9 2023 23: 41
            An attack aircraft does not need to fly to the middle of the Dnieper
            It is enough for the commander-in-chief to have eggs from AIII steel at least
      2. 0
        April 10 2023 21: 05
        Quote: Zhopir Tumanov
        If from a rocket capable of sinking 10000 ton ships,

        X-29TD and ships ??
        With a warhead in half of the "Caliber"?
        For a missile of this caliber, disabling a bridge (span) is more than a good result.
        And those CDs that are 10 tons for VI ships, warheads are 000 times more powerful. And the speed is three times higher.
  4. -7
    April 9 2023 16: 59
    So the information is not given: WHAT is clear, WHERE is also, but WHEN-?????? The bridge could have been bombed and rebuilt last year. This is a reproach to the editors of VO.
    1. +7
      April 9 2023 17: 20
      "But WHEN-??????" - Today. .already on all resources the video of the impact appeared. And only you, this is still not known.
      1. 0
        April 9 2023 17: 30
        There is not a word about the date in the article, that is the question. Last year's video could also appear on the resources. This has already happened.
        1. +2
          April 9 2023 17: 41
          "There is not a word about the date in the article, that's the question" - interesting .. And if they wrote specifically for you - today, how would you check .. After all, you already "happened" ..
          This is not a conditional "trench" without reference to the location and time. Especially with video recording. And "last year's" video has long been everywhere.
  5. +5
    April 9 2023 16: 59
    This is dilo!
    Well done now don't let them recover it.

    Or maybe something closer to the border of Poland?
    1. -2
      April 9 2023 22: 18
      Quote: 75Sergey
      Or maybe something closer to the border of Poland?

      If only they are allowed to fly up from Poland.
  6. +11
    April 9 2023 17: 00
    What was required to prove - that the matter is in desire. And how many in the comments there were shouts that they say - "how will you destroy bridges? They are not killed!" Even a whole sect of "witnesses of Unkillable Bridges" was formed. Although they will now begin to prove to everyone that "everything is not right and everything is wrong" ..
    1. +2
      April 9 2023 17: 49
      No need to be confused. This is a local bridge across a small river in the border area. A completely different matter is the capital bridge across the Dnieper, located in the guina of enemy territory, to which you still need to fly when countering air defense.
      1. +7
        April 9 2023 18: 03
        "which still needs to be flown when counteracting air defense." - Are you familiar with the performance characteristics of X-series missiles? If yes, then you will not have such questions - how to fly.
        "capital bridge across the Dnieper" - well, you will not crush it with one rocket. If we take into account how many x-owls and Calibers flew into the empty (for not so important and secondary targets), then there would be no bridges left at all.
        1. 0
          April 10 2023 00: 10
          Two examples for you on the effectiveness of missiles against bridges:
          About a dozen Calibers were fired at the bridge in Zatoka, the damage was temporary.
          Several dozen highmars were fired over the bridge in Kherson, the damage was also temporary.
          The Crimean bridge was withdrawn for a long time (for several months, and not all) after the explosion of several tons of special explosives on it.
    2. -2
      April 10 2023 00: 12
      Quote: Ivan "F"
      Even a whole sect of "witnesses of Unkillable Bridges"

      Do not strain: give a list of the bridges that were destroyed and where did this action affect the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and what was reflected in the tactical (I don’t touch the strategic at all) situation?
      Chur: Antonovsky bridge, dozens of these crossings, and Kherson - do not offer
    3. 0
      April 10 2023 11: 23
      This bridge on the border of the Russian Federation, it was possible to send and blow up the DRG, why waste expensive missiles, and given that it was simply damaged by 1 missile, this is for a "report", as they say, so that the urapatriots do not riot
  7. +12
    April 9 2023 17: 02
    Wait a second!! This is what happens - it means that you can still get on the bridge ?? Although we have been assured here for a year now that this is like impossible .. Then, in all its pristine beauty, the question arises, which is already frozen, why are the bridges across the Dnieper still intact? And through the rest of the numerous rivers on the way from the Polish border? Shnyaga, however, some comes out ..
    1. -9
      April 9 2023 17: 04
      why are the bridges across the Dnieper still intact?

      There are levers of influence - Kaliningrad, Transnistria, etc.
      1. +6
        April 9 2023 17: 07
        What - in retaliation for the bridges of Kaliningrad, will they bomb it ?? belay Then a counter question arises - do we, in turn, have absolutely no levers of influence left? Well, really, really? what
        1. -4
          April 9 2023 17: 14
          Will Kaliningrad be bombed??

          transport blockade.
          and we, in turn, have absolutely no levers of influence left

          Entire bridges across the Dnieper, as it were, are one of the levers of influence, if you suddenly didn’t understand what
          1. +7
            April 9 2023 17: 25
            Yeah. That is, there is no more leverage? And as soon as we demolish the bridges - immediately Kaliningrad and like kirdyk? So according to you? And we have nothing more to cool them with? What a wonderful vision of the world you have.
      2. +9
        April 9 2023 17: 09
        Or maybe the main problem is not in Kaliningrad and Transnistria, but in the fact that daughters in Dubai, wives in Courchevel at such a time hang around?
        1. -9
          April 9 2023 17: 16
          that daughters in Dubai, wives in Courchevel at such a time hang around?

          Well, better watch your wives and daughters in Courchevel laughing
          1. +1
            April 9 2023 17: 25
            Pulkovo 1942, but doesn’t it scare you that these daughters and wives are carriers of state secrets and objects for recruitment? They themselves climb there, "where you recruit, I don't want to."
          2. -3
            April 9 2023 19: 03
            The wife of Courchevel roams around Zelya. By the way, if I were in his place, instead of dreaming about how he would walk about Yalta, I would look after his wife, otherwise the hour is uneven, it will be too late to flap his wings.
            1. +3
              April 9 2023 19: 13
              mikh-korsarov, I don’t give a damn about Zelya and his wife, it worries me that the wife of citizen T. Ivanov (although they have been divorced since August 2022, it’s clear that this is a fictitious divorce in order to save everything “acquired by excessive service "), not the last person in our MO, hangs around Courchevel. In China, such a person would simply be shot, but in our country they should have at least been expelled from service with the wording - "loss of confidence."
              1. -8
                April 9 2023 19: 28
                Quote: Vladimir M
                although they have been divorced since August 2022, it is clear that this is a fictitious divorce in order to save everything "acquired by back-breaking service"

                Yes. Medicine is powerless here request
            2. +1
              April 10 2023 00: 22
              Quote: mikh-korsakov
              The wife of Courchevel roams around Zelya.

              Right?

              An interesting fact is that, together with Meladze, on vacation (Courchevel, Storage, NATO, entry and transit to Schengen for the Russian electorate is closed) they saw the wife of the Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Timur Ivanov - Svetlana Ivanova (Zakharova,)

              Timur Vadimovich Ivanov
              Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation
              from May 23 to 2016

              No.
      3. 0
        April 9 2023 22: 20
        Quote: Pulkovo1942
        There are levers of influence - Kaliningrad, Transnistria, etc.

        Grain deal, Druzhba gas pipeline...
    2. -1
      April 9 2023 17: 16
      Quote: paul3390
      it means that you can still get on the bridge ... why are the bridges across the Dnieper still intact?
      Do you see the difference between bridges across the Dnieper and a bridge across a river 50 meters wide? At the same time, the warhead weighing more than 300 kg only partially destroyed the span. And for the Dnieper bridges - this is a pellet for an elephant ...
      1. +8
        April 9 2023 17: 23
        Well, well - is the Dnieper the only river on the way from the Poles to the Donbass? Are there smaller streams along the way, with less monumental bridges? Or is there a continuous waterless desert behind the Dnieper?
        1. +2
          April 9 2023 18: 19
          Quote: paul3390
          and the Dnieper is the only river on the way from the Poles to the Donbass?
          The Dnieper, of course, is not the only river and there are a lot of rivers in Ukraine. And more bridges. Destroying everything is impossible. Destroying everything is pointless.
          In general, for example, you can look at the unfortunate Bakhmut, where there is only one physically uncut road, along which, however, the Ukrainian troops manage to drag something back and forth. Can you imagine how completely it is necessary to destroy all transport routes in order to stop the transportation of military goods from the same Poland or from the right bank to the left? And what gigantic resources will be required for this?
          By the way, we can recall historical examples: Leningrad withstood almost three years in almost complete blockade. The Sixth Army of Paulus, in full encirclement, resisted for three months.
          If it were possible to win by simply bombing communications in the rear, then everyone would have fought just like that - no tanks would have been needed ...
          1. 0
            April 11 2023 13: 29
            nik-mazur\\ Can you imagine the cost and complexity of bypassing a destroyed bridge in a wooded and swampy area? I'm not talking about the temporary hut itself, there are a lot of pontoon parks on the outskirts. I'm talking about a country road (entrance) along which only caterpillar and all-wheel drive vehicles can go 9 months a year,
      2. +1
        April 9 2023 17: 37
        Well, if the accuracy of the pellet is high, and another one will fly to the same place, then another one ... Sooner or later, the elephant will get hurt. The question is the required number of pellets, imho / And then, restoring one span over the Dnieper is more difficult than a span over a smaller river, isn't it?
        1. -1
          April 9 2023 18: 26
          Quote from USIKPA
          The question is the required number of pellets
          That's right, it's a matter of quantity. Try at least approximately to count and shudder soberly. Despite the fact that you will have to bomb not once and for all, but regularly, since the bridges will be constantly restored. And in addition to this, prefabricated bridges, pontoons will be built, crossings on ferries, barges, boats, rafts and the like will be established.
          And here the question arises about the ratio of costs and results. And I understand that it's just not profitable ...
          1. +5
            April 9 2023 20: 14
            Quote from: nik-mazur
            Quote from USIKPA
            The question is the required number of pellets
            That's right, it's a matter of quantity. Try at least approximately to count and shudder soberly.

            And here the question arises about the ratio of costs and results. And I understand that it's just not profitable ...
            You also need to consider how much damage uninterrupted supply of the Armed Forces...
            It is possible to repair the destroyed bridge, it is possible to establish a ferry crossing - but this will take time, there will be interruptions in the supply of ammo to the artillery.
            In the end, the same "ferry" can be destroyed, and possibly even with a load of shells.
            A ferry crossing cannot appear anywhere - there is a need for places to deliver cargo to the ferry and on the other side a convenient place for unloading and further removal of cargo - intelligence must "work out its bread" and find such places, give new target designations.
            hi
            1. +2
              April 9 2023 21: 53
              Quote: cat Rusich
              intelligence should "work out its bread" and find such places, give new target designations
              I think that intelligence is working out its bread to the fullest. It's just that you, apparently, do not represent the scale of the task.
          2. Alf
            0
            April 9 2023 21: 05
            Quote from: nik-mazur
            Despite the fact that you will have to bomb not once and for all, but regularly, since the bridges will be constantly restored. And in addition to this, prefabricated bridges, pontoons will be built, crossings on ferries, barges, boats, rafts and the like will be established.
            And here the question arises about the ratio of costs and results. And I understand that it's just not profitable

            But in WW2, the air forces of all countries did not know about this, constantly bombing enemy bridges ....
            1. +2
              April 9 2023 21: 54
              Quote: Alf
              But in WW2, the air forces of all countries did not know about this, constantly bombing enemy bridges
              Will you indulge in examples? Or a link to a source.
              1. Alf
                -1
                April 9 2023 21: 56
                Quote from: nik-mazur
                Quote: Alf
                But in WW2, the air forces of all countries did not know about this, constantly bombing enemy bridges
                Will you indulge in examples? Or a link to a source.

                Did you study the history of WW2? Or is the fact that the bridges were constantly bombed not known? I can’t provide a link for one simple reason - there is not enough space on the page ...
                1. 0
                  April 10 2023 11: 10
                  Quote: Alf
                  I can’t provide a link for one simple reason - there is not enough space on the page
                  The Second World War is a very large-scale event and everything happened there.
                  Nevertheless, there were general trends. Usually the bridges were destroyed by the retreating side in order to slow down the advance of the enemy. The sappers were engaged in this, and air strikes were used in cases where the bridge could not be destroyed. Then, yes, they sent aircraft, which usually suffered huge losses with rather low efficiency.
                  Long-range aviation struck in the rear, but these were industrial enterprises, warehouses, just bombing on squares, but bridges were definitely not priority targets, although they, of course, also fell under distribution.
                  Sabotage to destroy bridges in the rear was an extremely rare occurrence and, again, with dubious success, since it was an extremely difficult task to smuggle several hundredweights of explosives into a well-guarded facility.
                  The famous “Rail War” and “Concert” are, first of all, parts of a major operation, and all the actions of the partisans were coordinated with specific offensive plans. Well, it's never airstrikes.
    3. +3
      April 9 2023 17: 17
      That's bullshit. We think. The bridge is in the frontline zone, only a few kilometers to the Russian border. The missile was launched from its own airspace. The range of X-29T, depending on the versions, is 10 ... 30 km. How are you going to attack the bridges across the Dnieper or in Poland?
      1. -2
        April 9 2023 17: 34
        "How did you get together with this" - well, if you think that there is nothing else besides "this", it's sad .. You read the performance characteristics of X-series missiles, otherwise it sounds childish about "several kilometers to the border".
        1. -4
          April 9 2023 18: 10
          A few kilometers to the border - I counted by eye on the map. Did you watch it at all? If so, please correct me, how many km from the bridge to the Russian border?

          I am familiar with the performance characteristics of X-family missiles. They are not called strategic by chance; for a nuclear warhead there is no need to bother with a 5-meter QUO. The X-55 family has a KVO of 20 ... 100m, the X-101/102 family of KVOs of 10 ... 20m. Although it is, of course, possible to launch a mass launch of several dozen, even a hundred of such missiles with a conventional warhead. Only the mass of warheads they have is only 400kg. But sooner or later, some of them will hit the bridge. The question seems to be how much this will weaken Russia's nuclear forces.
          1. -1
            April 9 2023 18: 36
            "Please, correct me, how many km from the bridge to the Russian border?" - 1.5 km. And you presented this as the reason for the impossibility of striking the bridges in depth - "How did you intend to attack the bridges across the Dnieper or in Poland with this?" Those. you are clearly stating here that we cannot attack .. Or we cannot SPECIFIC X 29, but can we do others? Then why such questions in the void .. It's strange ..

            X55, X10... You modestly but stubbornly avoid those same ones - X32 and X22. They were shot anywhere, but not on bridges. So the question - how to fly to the bridge, did not stand.
            1. -2
              April 9 2023 19: 05
              I said a few, you said 1,5km. I don't understand what the argument is about.

              About X-22 after the tragedy in Dnepropetrovsk, it’s better to keep quiet. A rocket of the 70s with a radar seeker is very easily retargeted at the wrong thing, and an inertial one with its QUO is physically unable to hit the bridge.

              There is exactly one (in pieces) Kh-32 carrier, and how many missiles were produced ... for certain, only a few batches are known for certain. There were intentions, but no implementation. IMHO, no one will launch a rocket for 1 product (aircraft), these missiles simply do not exist outside the experimental batch. There are two reported episodes of the use of the Kh-32.
              1. +2
                April 9 2023 19: 34
                "I don't understand what the argument is about." I didn't understand your question either. but you asked, I answered. hi
                "Better keep quiet about the X-22 after the tragedy in Dnepropetrovsk." - Wow!! It turns out that you will be one of the "those" who believe that it was "we shot", and not the Ukrainians, in their stupidity, tried to shoot down the "object" over the city .. Curious! Are you a fan of ukrosmi? Although even they say that there was PROBABLY X22 .. And here you immediately famously write it off as scrap. Yes, people are becoming more and more interesting.
                "Physically unable to get into the bridge." - strongly! crying And that means you don't have to do anything.

                "Only a few pieces are known for certain." - "it is known for certain", this is a powerful argument on your part laughing Judging by your "confident" intonation - "there is no implementation", "no one will launch a rocket" "these missiles simply do not exist outside the experimental batch", you apparently directly take part in the fate of this rocket, direct participation Yes . Or are you just trying to convince yourself that there is nothing. But our opponent is not so categorical - there are not a few parties, like yours, but several dozen - "but not more than 30" for November 2022.
                So your question - "How are you going to attack the bridges with this" is not entirely correct. There is something to attack, you just need "desire".
                1. -1
                  April 9 2023 20: 17
                  Are you one of those who divide everything into black and white and do not think that there are no tragic accidents in war?

                  Of course, I cannot know (exactly like you). Only build an assumption on bits of open information. I tried to find information about the production and use of X-32 and there are very big problems with this. Unlike the other, weapons are used in NWO.

                  About the attack of bridges, I kind of admitted myself that with a very, very strong desire, one could try to beat the X-555/101 as well. At least once to check.
                  1. 0
                    April 9 2023 23: 47
                    "Are you one of those who divide everything into black and white and don't think that there are no tragic accidents in war?" - can be and are. But to say that this is exactly x22 is too self-confident, even the Ukrainians themselves uttered completely opposite versions there. Therefore, anything could be there. Plus they say that they used 200pcs. x22, even if one of them really failed, then most of them worked fine. So for bridges, the 22nd fits quite well, especially considering that it is hypersonic.
                    "X-32 and this is a very big problem." - yes, I agree. But given that it has been officially adopted since 2017, then there are several dozen for sure. As I said, the Ukrainians stated that there were no more than 30 of them. as of November 2022. Most likely, of course, more, but exactly how much is unknown. According to the carriers at the moment, there are definitely more than one, I watched a video from the Tupolev plant for a long time, they were just talking about the fact that the M3 was being converted into M3M.

                    "try to fuck. At least once for testing." - hi that's what everyone is talking about. Hit and see, choose the best option. But there were no blows at all. But on the transformers and various other buildings, poured in full.
              2. +1
                April 9 2023 20: 14
                "There is exactly one (in pieces) X-32 carrier," - do you personally pilot it? Otherwise, where does such "confidence in pieces" come from. Apparently from the wiki, but even there it’s vague and veiled, yes, for 2020 .. You clearly have “access” to such “materials” that others never dreamed of. For example - "it is known for certain", this is clearly a very serious supplier of classified data ..
                1. -1
                  April 9 2023 21: 25
                  TASS December 26, 2022, Long-range aviation of the Aerospace Forces (VKS) of the Russian Federation in 2023 will receive the first modernized Tu-22M3M missile-carrying bombers, said the commander of long-range aviation, Lieutenant-General Sergei Kobylash.

                  The first experimental bomber bomber Tu-22M3M took off on December 28, 2018. Accept this modification into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces originally planned for 2021 after completion of all tests with the modernization of 30 of the 60 available machines.

                  17 March 2023 The public council under the Ministry of Defense of Russia, as part of a two-day visit to Kazan, visited the Kazan Aviation Plant named after. S. P. Gorbunova, Following a visit to the aircraft plant, Moskovsky Komsomolets posted a photo report demonstrating two Tu-22M3M at the factory airfield: an experienced missile carrier used to test missile weapons and on-board equipment and the first "real" serial Tu-22M3M.
                  1. 0
                    April 9 2023 23: 51
                    I will not argue here, since it was off. statement of the Ministry of Defense, although I heard and saw about the ongoing modernization before. But in any case, it means there are already at least 2 carriers wink
      2. 0
        April 10 2023 10: 26
        As I understand it - the presence of the same Iskander with a declared range of 500 km and a KVO of 1m somehow passed by your attention? what I'm generally silent about the Dagger .. belay
    4. +2
      April 9 2023 18: 01
      Quote: paul3390
      This is what happens - it means that you can still get on the bridge ?? Although we have been assured here for a year now that it’s like impossible.


      Quote: Roma-1977
      No need to be confused. This is a local bridge across a small river in the border area. A completely different matter is the capital bridge across the Dnieper, located in the guina of enemy territory, to which you still need to fly when countering air defense.
    5. -2
      April 9 2023 20: 46
      Possible-possible. hi "" "
  8. +5
    April 9 2023 17: 02
    Precisely. Well, we got to the bridges. Good deed!
  9. +6
    April 9 2023 17: 12
    We need two more: one is not enough, pure mathematics.
    1. +1
      April 9 2023 20: 45
      So far, we have only reached the bridge 1,5 km from the border, aircraft were used from their territory. And no one knows how to apply it in the depths of Ukraine, it seems, otherwise they would have been crushed already.
  10. -2
    April 9 2023 17: 13
    The bridge across the river in the territory occupied by the enemy was destroyed in order to counteract its use by sabotage and reconnaissance groups of the main department of Ukrainian military intelligence to penetrate the territory of the Russian Federation and attack the settlements of the Bryansk region.

    If this is true about the DRG, then it was necessary to arrange ambushes, and now look for wind in the field, you can cross this river anywhere. It would be better if our "valiant" pilots tinned some kind of bridge across the Dnieper. Well, when will the mind increase in ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. +2
    April 9 2023 17: 27
    Respect, honor and respect!!! Down and Out trouble started.
  12. +2
    April 9 2023 17: 32
    When you see these shots, you get even more angry for the actions of our leaders... Why couldn't this be done from the first day of the war??? And why did they start to duplicate Avdiivka with FABs only a month ago???
    How many civilians in Donetsk died because of someone's miscalculations...
    1. Alf
      +5
      April 9 2023 21: 08
      Quote: Mikhail-Ivanov
      How many civilians in Donetsk died because of someone's miscalculations...

      This is not called "miscalculation", this is called "command incompetence" ...
  13. +1
    April 9 2023 17: 34
    Here, indeed, - it turns out, we can and can?
  14. +1
    April 9 2023 17: 36
    Only a year has passed, and finally aviation started working and the FABs, and not the NURSs, went into business
    1. +1
      April 9 2023 17: 57
      Quote from: topol717
      go to the FAB case

      Where did you see FAB? It is said well - X29

  15. -2
    April 9 2023 18: 00
    Damn the bridge, it’s still intact. But it’s not easier to throw a sabotage group there with explosives and blow it up thoroughly at night. And what they do and what we shouldn’t do too.
    1. +1
      April 9 2023 18: 14
      The DRG will pass without a bridge at all. The blow was to prevent them from using vehicles. You saw the video of them driving there in cars, this allowed them to quickly enter and leave. So blow to cut off transport.
  16. +2
    April 9 2023 18: 00
    A map of the location of these villages, the borders of Russia - Ukraine, and the bridge in question
    I will not argue how this bridge can be a key facility, and how its destruction will prevent the appearance of Ukrainian formations in Russian villages - there are specialists for this, they will figure it out.
    The distance from the border to the bridge is about 1 km.
    1. -5
      April 9 2023 18: 18
      The distance from the border to the bridge is about 1 km.

      Stupidly they created difficulties for themselves, we will have to build a crossing if we go forward. With such a task as preventing the penetration of the DRG, you can also blow up bridges in your own ...
      I will continue the performance characteristics of the Sudost River
      The length is 208 km, the area of ​​the drainage basin is 6200 km². The regional centers of the Bryansk region are located on the river - the village of Zhiryatino and the cities of Pochep and Pogar. It freezes for the period from December to April. The slope of the river is about 10 cm and the speed of its flow is about 4 km per hour. The tributaries have a higher slope and the flow of water in them is faster. The channel has a width of about 10 - 15 m, a depth of 1,5 - 2 m, the width of the valley in Pochep is about 1 km.

      A sparrow is knee-deep, and only for the DRG ... They just spent an expensive rocket ...
      1. -1
        April 9 2023 18: 35
        Quote: Konnick
        Stupidly they created difficulties for themselves, we will have to build a crossing if we go forward ... We just spent an expensive rocket ...

        Do you really think that you are the smartest, most informed and, in general, the best? Sadly, if so ... the symptom is not good request
    2. +1
      April 9 2023 20: 48
      Judging by the direction of the flow of the river, it does not need to be crossed at all, it flows across the border, and not along, flows in this place.
  17. 0
    April 9 2023 18: 00
    I can imagine how the military leaders of the General Staff broke themselves. Probably all the cards were filled with tears. I had to encroach on the sacred! No mercy!
  18. -1
    April 9 2023 18: 16
    Well, who said that this is not possible, that we have nothing and other garbage.
  19. +3
    April 9 2023 18: 29
    Why not make the video 5 seconds longer? So that the smoke dissipates and you can see what kind of hole has appeared
  20. 0
    April 9 2023 18: 57
    Russian Aerospace Forces are increasingly using air bombs equipped with flight correction modules in the special operation zone in Ukraine, which allows aircraft to strike without entering the enemy’s air defense coverage area

    Great job. The weapon is effective! Aviation guys!
  21. +1
    April 9 2023 19: 08
    It is possible that the bridge was not the main target. They beat on transport or checkpoint.
  22. 0
    April 9 2023 19: 34
    It would be more likely that all the bridges across the Dnieper were removed.
  23. +1
    April 9 2023 19: 34
    Previously, it was possible to smash, but apparently at the top there are other plans and opinions.
  24. 0
    April 9 2023 19: 46
    It would be interesting to trace the further fate of this bridge. As one of the arguments to bomb bridges or not to bomb. How long will it take to restore it? Although if it is not particularly important for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, they may not be in a hurry. But, I think, to repair such a hole, for the passage of equipment 2-4 days.
    1. 0
      April 9 2023 20: 16
      Quote: Arkadich
      to repair such a hole, for the passage of equipment 2-4 days
      Much faster, because the military does not repair bridges, but uses its own methods, such as tank bridge layers - even half an hour can be enough there.
  25. +2
    April 9 2023 20: 31
    The government of Ukraine provided this photo
    1. -2
      April 10 2023 02: 20
      The Bridges of Invincibility sect is protesting. This is impossible)) They have bridges made of Railmetal armor with spans 20 meters thick of reinforced concrete))) In fact, anyone who has studied the topic of OTRK a little knows that an OTRK from 300 kg can collapse the span of almost any bridge with an optical seeker for accurate guidance. Large bridges are actually easier to drop than small ones. there the spans are longer and the load lever is higher. Therefore, a span of 50 meters from the crack will collapse faster than a span of 10 meters.

      The Kremlin does not fire at bridges out of its outlandish political logic, but it’s not a problem for Iskander with the optical seeker from the Radar to get into the span of even a bridge across the Dnieper, just like 500 kg of a land mine, no span will withstand if the missiles don’t pierce the canvas through and through, but explode in several meters from the canvas. This is also a function of the optical seeker, where often a paired laser rangefinder or simply calculation from an image
      1. 0
        April 10 2023 09: 19
        In order to collapse the span of a railway bridge in the form of a truss, you need to get into the lower or upper bearing belt of the truss, the cross section of which is usually less than a square meter, if you get to another place, for example, into a truss brace or road surface, the span will stand, if the span is assembled from several reinforced concrete beams, then with the destruction of one of them, the span can withstand. As you can see in the photo, the road surface of the reinforced concrete bridge collapsed, but there was no collapse of the span as a whole, which means that the hit was somewhere between the beams and probably the repair will not be particularly difficult
  26. -1
    April 10 2023 18: 29
    Hooray. It came to the General Staff. Maybe in a year it will come that you need to bomb the zelebobus with its snoops, the SBU and their general staff good
  27. 0
    April 11 2023 08: 15
    So that speculators from Moscow went to work to the east, they decided to break bridges to dachas in Europe. I mean in the west. And you can bring gold to summer cottages in Europe through Turkey.))) Bloody hypocrisy.