The last battles of Mithridates VI Eupator and the fate of the Pontic kingdom

20
The last battles of Mithridates VI Eupator and the fate of the Pontic kingdom

The story of the Third Mithridatic War in previous article we ended with the resignation of Lucullus. He was replaced as commander by the consul Manius Acilius Glabrion, who was once married to Sulla's stepdaughter, but on the orders of the dictator he was forced to divorce her, giving way to his pregnant wife Gnaeus Pompey (this woman died during childbirth). Now he, having not achieved any success in the war with Mithridates, at the beginning of 66 BC. e. ceded to Pompey and the army.

Pompey the Great vs Mithridates VI Eupator


Pompey had just completed a grandiose operation against the Cilician pirates, from whom he managed to clear the Mediterranean Sea.




Sculptural portrait of Pompey, circa 70 BC. e., Paris, Louvre

And Mithridates by that time had already conquered Pontus, Cappadocia and threatened the Roman province of Asia. And in the battle at Zela, the legates of Lucullus, who had left for Rome, lost about 7 thousand soldiers, including 24 military tribunes and 150 centurions. Only the wound of Mithridates allowed the Romans to avoid encirclement and complete defeat.


Sculptural portrait of Mithridates VI Eupator, XNUMXst c. BC e., the Hermitage

Arriving at the troops, Pompey entered into negotiations with the king, offering him to surrender to the mercy of Rome. Having received a refusal, he replenished the troops with people, bringing the size of the army to 40-50 thousand people, and sent ambassadors to Parthia, promising, in the event of an attack on Armenia, some provinces in Mesopotamia.

Meanwhile, Tigran II was opposed by his son, the grandson of Mithridates, who made an alliance with the Parthians. Now the Armenian king was not up to the support of his father-in-law. Soon he will be forced to conclude a humiliating peace treaty with Rome. And Pompey defeated the Pontic king in the last big battle near the city of Lycus. They say that the Pontic horsemen dismounted to support their infantry, but when the enemy cavalry appeared on the battlefield, they rushed to the camp where their horses stood. This caused panic in the ranks of the army of Mithridates, whose soldiers decided that their comrades were fleeing because they were beaten. In memory of this victory, Pompey founded the city of Nikopol here.

Mithridates VI in the Kingdom of Bosporus


Mithridates fled to Colchis, where he spent the winter of 66-65 in Dioscuria. BC e., and then moved to the territory of the Bosporan kingdom. Here his son Mahar ruled, by that time he had already rebelled against his father. Mithridates removed him from power and forced him to commit suicide.


Mount Mithridates, Kerch - the former Bosporan Panticapaeum


Ruins of Panticapaeum


Monument to Mithridates VI at the foot of Mount Mithridates

Pompey left Mithridates alone for a while. In the Caucasus in 65 BC. e. he defeated the troops of the Iberian and Albanian tribes, but did not completely subdue them, citing "insurmountable obstacles from local snakes." He forced Tigran II to recognize himself as a vassal of Rome, and the Armenian king personally came to him and humbly handed over the crown taken from his head. If Mithridates had done the same in time, he might have saved part of his kingdom, but the proud Pontic did not go to such humiliation.

In 64 BC. e. Pompey completed the conquest of Pontus and created in Asia Minor several small states vassal to Rome - Cappadocia, Paphlagonia, Galatia. Then he easily captured Syria, making it a Roman province, and subjugated Judea to Rome.

Mithridates has not yet come to terms with defeat. He entered into negotiations with the barbarian tribes that lived in the Northern Black Sea region and on the Danube. Based on them, Mithridates planned to strike at Italy. However, to implement such a large-scale and ambitious plan, money was required, which he tried to collect from the Bosporans, primarily from the population of large and wealthy Greek cities, such as Phanagoria, Panticapaeum, Chersonesus, Feodosia, and some others. Mithridates responded to the speeches of disgruntled citizens with cruel repressions and executions. He achieved only an open rebellion, and Phanagoria (a city on the Taman Peninsula) was the first to rise.

Four sons and a daughter of Mithridates came out of the besieged fortress and surrendered. But the citadel was kept protected by his other daughter - Cleopatra. Literally on the eve of the fall of the city fortress, a squadron of Mithridates approached Phanagoria, evacuating its defenders.

By the way, in 2004, near Phanagoria under water, a tombstone was discovered dating back to the XNUMXst century BC. e. with the inscription: "Gypsicrates wife of Tsar Mithridates Eupator":


Stone with the name of Hypsicrates, the wife of King Mithridates

She is mentioned by Plutarch, who reports that in one of the battles, Hypsicrates, the former concubine of Mithridates, who became his legal wife, was next to the king: dressed in men's clothes, she, sitting on a horse, "fought like a valiant warrior."


Coin depicting Hypsicrates

And in 2012, a bireme from the time of Mithridates VI was found under water, the wooden parts of which retained traces of a fire.

Death of Mithridates VI Eupator


But back to 63 BC. e. The example of the rebellious Phanagoria was then followed by Chersonese, Theodosius and Nymphaeum. Only the capital city of Panticapaeum remained loyal to Mithridates. But Farnak, beloved son of Mithridates, betrayed his father, and he managed to lure the army and navy to his side. In 63 BC. e. Mithridates with people loyal to him was besieged in the royal palace of Panticapaeum. Realizing that he was doomed, the former great king decided to poison himself, but this attempt was unsuccessful: either the poison was of poor quality, or it made itself felt immune to poisons, which he tried to develop in himself as a teenager, when he was hiding from relatives. Yes, and becoming king, as they say, he continued to take small doses of poisons, the effect of which was tested on criminals sentenced to death. Appian states in his writing "Stories Rome":

“Mithridates took out the poison that he always carried next to his sword and mixed it. His two daughters, who were still girls growing up together, named Mithridates and Nysa, who were betrothed to the kings of Egypt and Cyprus, asked him first to give them some poison, and they insisted strongly and would not let him drink it until they will drink. The medicine acted on them at once; but on Mithridates, although he quickly walked around to hasten its action, it had no effect, because he was accustomed to other drugs, constantly trying them as a remedy for poisoners.

This form of resistance to poison is still called mithridatism.

Dio Cassius, speaking of the last hours of the life of Mithridates, also writes that this king took antidotes:

“Mithridates tried to commit suicide, and after first poisoning his wives and remaining children, he swallowed whatever was left; however, neither by this method nor by the sword could he die by his own hands. For the poison, though deadly, did not prevail over him, because he accustomed his constitution to it, taking daily antidotes in large doses.

And this author explains unsuccessful suicide attempts with a sword by the weakness of Mithridates' hands due to age and the effect of poison, which, without killing him, nevertheless had some effect on the body.

About what happened next, Appian and Dio Cassius tell differently. Appian gives this version of the death of Mithridates:

“Seeing a certain Bituit, a Gallic general, he said to him:
“I won a lot from your right hand against my enemies. I will profit the most from this if you kill me and save him from the danger of being at the head of the Roman triumph, who for so many years was an autocrat and ruler of such a great kingdom, but now cannot die from poison, because, like a fool, he defended himself. from the poison of others. Although I watched and guarded against all the poisons that a person takes with food, I did not take care of the domestic poison, which was always the most dangerous for kings - about the betrayal of the army, children and friends.
Bituit, who was thus addressed, rendered the desired service to the king.


Luzgin A. Death of Mithridates


N. Xandopulo. Death of King Mithridates VI of Eupator

But Dio Cassius claims that Mithridates' death was violent, and he was treacherously killed by his own soldiers:

“When he failed to kill himself by his own efforts, and he delayed beyond the allotted time, those whom he sent against his son attacked him and hastened his death with their swords and spears. Thus, Mithridates, having experienced the most varied and wonderful fortunes, did not even have the usual end of his life. For wishing to die and seeking to commit suicide, he could not do it; but ... was killed by his enemies.

Thus ended the more than 50-year reign of Mithridates VI. And with his death, the Third Mithridatic War ended.

Completion of the history of the Pontic kingdom


Farnak recognized the power of the Romans and was left to rule the Bosporan kingdom, with the exception of Phanagoria. Trying to appease Pompey, he sent him the body of his father by ship. The Roman commander showed nobility to the defeated enemy, ordering with honor to bury him in his homeland. According to one version, the tomb of Mithridates VI was located in the first capital of Ponta Amasia, according to another - in Sinope. When another civil war began in the Roman Republic, Pharnaces II, not far from Nikopol founded by Pompey, defeated the Roman army of Domitius and for a short time returned Cappadocia and Lesser Armenia.


Bosporus warrior on a stele from Patikapaion, XNUMXst century BC BC e.

However, Farnak was soon defeated at the Battle of Zela by Caesar, who then sent the famous short report to Rome: “Veni, vidi, vici” (“I came, I saw, I conquered”).

Farnak fled to the Crimea, where he died in battle with his own commander, the Panticapean Greek Asander, to whom he entrusted the management of the Bosporus during his absence. Asander married the daughter of Pharnaces (granddaughter of Mithridates) Dynamis.


Gold coin of the Bosporus king Asander

After his death, the state was ruled by Dynamia, who, under pressure from Rome, was forced to marry Polemon, a Greek from the city of Laodice, a former subordinate of Mark Anthony, who had previously been the prefect of Cilicia and Lycaonia, and then received the throne of King Pontus from this triumvir.


Queen Dynamia, bronze bust found in 1898, Hermitage

The son of Asander and Dynamia - Aspurg, the great-grandson of Mithridates VI received the status of "friend of the Roman people" and still retained some independence, although he minted coins with portraits of Roman rulers.


Coins of King Aspurg

The further history of the Bosporan kingdom, which existed until the 520s–530s, until it came under the rule of Byzantium, is beyond the scope of this article.

So, the expansion of the Pontic kingdom under Mithridates VI turned out to be ephemeral. After the defeat of this king, Rome annexed to its possessions its western part, which became the province of Bithynia and Pontus. The eastern part of Pontus, called the Little Armenian Kingdom, was transferred to the king of Galatia Deiotarus Philoromeus (the leader of the Gallic tribe of the Teutobogians), who in 48 BC. e. supported Pompey in his war with Caesar. Later, Mark Antony donated part of Pontus to the already mentioned Polemon, whose second wife was the granddaughter of the triumvir Pythodorides.

The Pontic kings became obedient vassals of Rome, but in 62 Nero finally abolished this state. The fact is that Nero was also a descendant of Mark Antony: his maternal grandmother was Anthony the Elder, the daughter of Mark Antony and the sister of Octavian Augustus. And therefore, Nero believed that, as a relative of Queen Pythodoris, he had the right to the throne of Pontus. Its last king, Polemon II (a descendant of Mark Antony), refused to fight and abdicated.


Sculptural portrait of the last king of Pontus Polemon II, Copenhagen Glyptothek

Emperor Constantine I the Great divided the former possessions of the Pontic kings into two provinces. Western in honor of his mother Helena was named Helenopont, we remember that the capital of this province was Amasia. The eastern province was named Pontus Polemonos, and Neocaesarea became its capital.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 4 2023 05: 33
    Sic transit gloria mundi - this is how worldly glory passes.
    1. +1
      April 5 2023 21: 16
      ""... Having received a refusal, he replenished the troops with people, bringing the size of the army to 40-50 thousand people, and sent ambassadors to Parthia, promising, in the event of an attack on Armenia, some provinces in Mesopotamia ...""
      ----
      Yes, history repeats itself in a spiral and there is nothing new under the sun .... The author should also remember that Rome shamefully lost 2 wars against Armenia ... Guy Suetonius Tranquill (a contemporary of Rome) wrote about this in his famous book about late Rome ...
      How did it happen that in the theater of Ancient Armenia, instead of a sham head, they showed the real head of the defeated winner of Spartacus Mark Crassus?
      Already 2074 years have passed since the day when this unusual action took place during a performance in Artashat, as ancient historians wrote about. The Romans called Artashat the "Carthage of Armenia" and believed that the famous Carthaginian commander, the storm of Rome - Hannibal, took direct part in the planning and construction of the city.
      According to the ancient Greek writer, historian and philosopher of the Roman era Plutarch, in 53 BC, when the Roman commander Mark Licinius Crassus died in a battle with the Parthian commander Suren at Carrah in Mesopotamia (modern Harran in the Turkish province of Sanliurfa), Suren sent his head to the king of Parthia, Orodes II. At that time, he was in Artashat at the wedding of his heir Pakor I with the daughter of Artavazd II (son of Tigran the Great).
      Both kings were present at the performance of the tragedy of Euripides "Bacchae". On that day, a troupe led by the tragedian Jason performed. And the actor who played Agave, the mother of Pentheus (the king of the city of Thebes), in a frenzy rushing about with the head of her own son killed by her, brought out instead of the fake head usually used in the theater, the real head of Crassus, with the words: "here are the antlers of the deer killed by us on happy hunting." The head was impaled on a thyrsus - a wooden rod. (Plutarch, Crassus, ch. 30-33.) Dio Cassius - Roman consul and historian also describes the death of Mark Licinius. He reports that after the battle, the Parthians poured molten gold into the mouth of the dead Crassus, mocking his greed. (Dio Cassius, XL, 27). Actually, this is the only case when Spartacus, though not directly, but indirectly through his enemy Crassus, was somehow connected with the history of Armenia. However, the 20th century, together with the scientific and technological revolution and the development of education, also became the century of the generation of a huge mass of new false myths.
      Who "betrayed" Spartacus, and who were the Cilician pirates?
      Today, on the Internet, you can stumble upon a lot of absolutely false "stories" that have no, even the slightest historical basis. Anti-Armenian propaganda has been exploiting them for a long time, although they can only cause laughter among those who know history. One of them, which is especially exaggerated by Azerbaijani propaganda, is called - "How the Armenians betrayed Spartak."

      It is not surprising that for ignorant readers it is perceived as something true, but sometimes even Armenians who do not know their history well take it seriously. For illustration, photographs and even excerpts from the famous Hollywood film "Spartacus" (directed by Stanley Kubrick, 1960) based on the novel by Howard Fast are given. The film at one time became a big event in the world of cinema, today it is considered a classic. But since it was artistic, many details were fictitious, since there were no details in ancient sources. Even the name of Spartak's wife was not exactly known, as they say, history did not save, so everyone had to invent, and not only in the cinema. In the film - Varinia, in Raffaello Giovagnoli's novel "Spartacus" (1874) his beloved - Valeria, and this is a patrician, the wife of the dictator Sulla, in Aram Khachaturian's ballet (1956) - Phrygia, etc. And even more so the names of pirates. The plot of the film unfolds like this.

      The rebel army marches to Brindisi, but despite prior agreement, the pirate emissary refuses to transport the rebels. Spartacus beats out of him a confession that Crassus bought the pirates. Pompey's army is approaching from the west; Lucullus' army is sailing from Asia by sea to Brindisi. The rebels have nowhere to retreat.
      In this part, the episode with the Cilician pirates takes place, which perhaps really took place, according to some ancient historians. Here is the story of Plutarch: "... and Spartacus, meanwhile, retreated through Lucania and went to the sea. Having met Cilician pirates in the strait, he decided to move with their help to Sicily, land two thousand people on the island and again ignite the uprising of the Sicilian slaves, which had barely died out shortly before, a spark would have been enough to flare it up with renewed vigor. But the Cilicians, having agreed with Spartacus on transportation and accepting gifts, deceived him and left the strait. Forced to retreat from the coast, Spartacus settled down with an army on the Rhegian Peninsula. Crassus also came up. (Plutarch, Crassus, ch. 10).
      However, Plutarch does not say anything about what nationality the pirates belonged to, nor does he mention any names of their leaders.
      Their role does not quite correspond to the facts that have come down to us: in the film they were supposed to deliver the rebellious slaves to their native countries, but they were bribed by the Roman commander Marcus Licinius Crassus, and therefore they left the slaves surrounded. According to Plutarch, Spartacus really negotiated with the Cilician pirates. But they were not supposed to bring the rebels home, but to transport 2000 of his fighters to Sicily, where he wanted to ignite a new uprising among the local slaves, multiplying the problems of the Romans. The Cilicians accepted his gifts, but did not fulfill the contract.
      There is nothing of the sort in Howard Fast's novel itself. The episode came up later when the script was being written. The production of the film proved difficult, mainly due to censorship changes and difficulties with the script, which was completely rewritten several times. And it was filmed by two directors, started by Anthony Mann, and continued and finished by Stanley Kubrick, who later admitted that this was the only unloved of his films for him, although he brought him fame. Producer and lead actor Kirk Douglas poignantly joked that Spartacus took longer than the uprising itself, and lasted more than two years, which, by the standards of the American film industry, is far beyond the norm.

      Douglas initially wanted the author of the book to be the screenwriter. However, Howard Fast was inexperienced in screenwriting and was a communist, which could easily lead to censorship problems. After reading the first 60 pages of Fast's script, based on his own novel, Douglas called them "a disaster." I had to quickly find a replacement. Douglas turned to Dalton Trumbo, another left-wing writer who spent eleven months in prison in 1950.
      It was Trumbo who wrote the script, and he remade it many more times at the request of the producers. Apparently, he came up with the name Tigran for the emissary of the Cilician pirates and even a semblance of a surname - Levant, played by the British actor of Czech origin Herbert Lom. with their help, move to Sicily, land two thousand people on the island and rekindle the uprising of the Sicilian slaves, which had barely died out shortly before, a spark would be enough to flare it up with renewed vigor. But the Cilicians, having agreed with Spartacus on transportation and accepting gifts, deceived him and left the strait. Forced to retreat from the coast, Spartacus settled with an army on the Rhegian peninsula. Crassus also approached here. (Plutarch, Crassus, ch. 10).
      However, Plutarch does not say anything about what nationality the pirates belonged to, nor does he mention any names of their leaders.
      Their role does not quite correspond to the facts that have come down to us: in the film they were supposed to deliver the rebellious slaves to their native countries, but they were bribed by the Roman commander Marcus Licinius Crassus, and therefore they left the slaves surrounded. According to Plutarch, Spartacus really negotiated with the Cilician pirates. But they were not supposed to bring the rebels home, but to transport 2000 of his fighters to Sicily, where he wanted to ignite a new uprising among the local slaves, multiplying the problems of the Romans. The Cilicians accepted his gifts, but did not fulfill the contract.
      There is nothing of the sort in Howard Fast's novel itself. The episode came up later when the script was being written. The production of the film proved difficult, mainly due to censorship changes and difficulties with the script, which was completely rewritten several times. And it was filmed by two directors, started by Anthony Mann, and continued and finished by Stanley Kubrick, who later admitted that this was the only unloved of his films for him, although he brought him fame.
  2. +6
    April 4 2023 06: 11
    Thank you, Valery!

    Today, one simply hears the music of place names that have been dear since childhood. And, therefore, especially vividly perceived.
    1. +3
      April 4 2023 07: 04
      I join the opinion of Sergei.
      Thanks to the respected Author for a wonderful series of articles on the history of the Pontic kingdom
    2. +4
      April 4 2023 07: 06
      Hello, Sergey! smile
      I join in the gratitude.
      I have been to Kerch, but I didn’t get to Mount Mithridates, but everything is familiar, if not from childhood, then from youth.
      1. +5
        April 4 2023 07: 25
        Hi Constantine!

        Mom went to school in Kerch. But he was only passing through.

        There was a pause of twenty years. And then - return to the Crimea. And understanding - that it is quite a second homeland.
  3. +5
    April 4 2023 06: 13
    Thank you very much Valery for an interesting series of articles.
  4. +7
    April 4 2023 06: 28
    By the way, in 2004, near Phanagoria under water, a tombstone was discovered dating back to the XNUMXst century BC. e. with the inscription: "Gypsicrates wife of Tsar Mithridates Eupator":

    Valery is wrong. Not in 2004, but in 1999.
    The tombstone of Gipsikrat was found by a Voronezh detachment led by Vitaly Latartsev, the general director of the underwater technical works enterprise.
    1. +4
      April 4 2023 06: 34
      According to Appian, in 63 BC there was an uprising in Phanagoria. According to Vladimir Dmitrievich Kuznetsov, doctor of historical sciences, head of the Phanagoria expedition, the inhabitants of the city laid siege to the acropolis and set it on fire in order to capture the royal garrison and the children of Mithridates. Mithridates, while Pompey was still in Syria, sent part of the army to Phanagoria, but events took a different turn when the Phanagorian Castor, once offended by the royal eunuch Tryphon, attacked him when he entered the city and killed him, calling the people to freedom. Despite the fact that Artaphernes and other sons of Mithridates already owned the acropolis, the inhabitants surrounded it with a tree and set it on fire. The children of Mithridates were forced to surrender, afraid of the fire. Of these, only Artaphernes was about forty years old, the rest were still youths ... During the ensuing battle with the royal children, there was also Hypsicratia, who, saving the children of her loved one, died in this battle ...
      As the archaeologist notes, during excavations on the acropolis of Phanagoria, the expedition discovered traces of this fire: coal, ash and charred wood. But the most interesting thing was that during the underwater excavations carried out in 1999 by the Voronezh PTR detachment, headed by Vitaly Latartsev, the general director of the Pyotr underwater technical works, fragments of buildings, columns, sculptures, griffins were brought to light from under the water and sphinxes, as well as fragments of amphorae and many other artifacts related to the life of ancient Phanagoria, among which a truly priceless gift of fate was the discovery of a stele of grayish-blue marble with the inscription:
      [Ύ] ψίκρατες γύναι
      βασιλέως Μιθραδάτο [υ]
      Εὐπάτορος Διονύσου,
      χαῖρε

      Translation: "Gypsicrates, wife of King Mithridates Eupator Dionysus, farewell"

      Thus, the words of Plutarch and Appian were confirmed word for word. It is worth noting here that in 2009 the American Archaeological Institute included this discovery among the 10 outstanding discoveries made by archaeologists in the world.
      1. +7
        April 4 2023 06: 45
        I am Hypsicracy. wife and warrior.
        I was twice captured by Mithridates,
        Was like an impenetrable wall
        In battle, but the enemy turned out to be agile.

        I was immensely pleased with the captivity,
        I was taut like a string...
        But an admiring look ... in the night the moon ...
        I don't remember how... I gave up this time limply.

        And since then, the king is a complete ruler.
        He was the only one who could conquer me.
        I go through fire and water for him,

        It's not even a pity to give your life,
        Just to know that God's grace
        Forever with him and will not leave forever. (With)
  5. +2
    April 4 2023 06: 41
    Mithridates VI did not survive his love for long. The death of the king in 63 BC was the result of the betrayal of his son-in-law Tigran II and son Farnak, as well as the infidelity of the mercenary army. In memory of the great king, who fought against Rome for many years, Mithridates Mountain now towers over Kerch, in one of the caves of which, according to legend, the faithful horse Arzhun, made of pure gold in full growth, was buried, presented to him by the Scythian Amazon Hypsicratia.
    Many centuries have passed since then. Phanagoria in the XNUMXth century AD. suffered a terrible fate: the waves of the sea, having swooped down unexpectedly, covered the city like Atlantis. All this was accompanied by a powerful earthquake. The next day, in the place of blooming Phanagoria, the muddy waters of the Taman Bay calmly splashed ...
  6. +7
    April 4 2023 07: 00
    . He entered into negotiations with the barbarian tribes that lived in the Northern Black Sea region and on the Danube.


    Is this what the author calls the representatives of the most ancient people in the Galaxy?
  7. +4
    April 4 2023 08: 25
    How interesting: the sons betrayed Mithridates, the daughters were poisoned with him.
  8. +5
    April 4 2023 11: 47
    As a child, I read Polupudnev's novel "Mithridates" about these events.
  9. Fat
    +5
    April 4 2023 12: 16
    hi Great article! I find it difficult to comment on the subject, so I will refrain.
    Thank you, Valery.
    1. +2
      April 4 2023 22: 12
      Good evening!
      The article is just amazing! Thank you very much, Valery! It’s also hard to comment, but I still put all the pros. I think that many will agree with me that Valery's articles are understandable and very interesting!
  10. +5
    April 4 2023 13: 15
    Damn, I'm sorry. But why so few comments? And I look forward to them in Valery's articles no less than the articles themselves. Is it the release date of the article? On Tuesday ? Unusual time (and unusual). It remains to find out who is to blame? Reptilians? Shpakovsky? New moon? Revision ?
    Arranged in random order, Shpakovsky please do not be offended, the rest can. For under suspicion good
    1. Fat
      +6
      April 4 2023 13: 32
      hi Greetings, Sergey.
      Quote: Cure72
      Damn, I'm sorry. But why so few comments?

      Because the base contingent is strenuously fighting for "historical justice" under the article of V.O. Shpakovsky. I guess they will pull up in the evening smile
      1. +3
        April 4 2023 20: 51
        What's the point of fighting for her? I think we have already formed ideologically. Alas, you can reforge the fragile ones.

        Our generation, however, only fills the blank spots.
    2. +5
      April 4 2023 17: 21
      Fighting the new moon through comments is new in astrophysics.

      Although, you can disperse any event.
      I'll try to do it in the evening.

      It doesn't require much effort.