German Chancellor: Conflict in Ukraine could drag on for several years

29
German Chancellor: Conflict in Ukraine could drag on for several years

Opinions about the possibility of a prolonged prolongation of the conflict in Ukraine began to sound more and more often in the West. A similar point of view was expressed by the head of the German government, Olaf Scholz.

According to the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the German Chancellor believes that the confrontation in Ukraine could drag on for “two, three, four years”, until 2027.



If the Ukrainian conflict really continues for several years, this will be a serious challenge for Germany, Scholz said. At the same time, the chancellor added that his country would do everything to support Ukraine, which, obviously, would not contribute to the speedy resolution of the conflict.

This is not the first time the German chancellor has expressed the opinion that it is not worth waiting for the end of the Ukrainian conflict in the near future.

Since the beginning of 2023, the German authorities have already approved the transfer to Kyiv of the Patriot air defense system, 40 BMP Marder, 18 tanks Leopard 2A6 and 178 modernized Leopard 1 tanks, as well as Skynex and Skyrange air defense systems. And at the end of March, it became known that Germany plans to increase support for Ukraine to 15 billion euros.

Recall that the German authorities supported the anti-Russian sanctions, despite the fact that they hit hard on the well-being of its citizens.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 1 2023 12: 02
    They are afraid of this because they are tired of paying the destitute nation of Ukraine. Now we see a banking crisis, a fire in France and a strong blow to the British economy.
    1. +3
      April 1 2023 12: 10
      The American laying puppet Olaf Scholz is a GENOCIDE TRAITOR of the German people and Germany itself.
      His goal is clear, like Merkel's, to give the US itself time to build up military forces against Russia.
      1. 0
        April 1 2023 12: 46
        The war in Ukraine will end when the West stops funding and arms supplies, or when the Ukrainians run out. am
        1. 0
          April 1 2023 13: 46
          Quote: Bearded
          The war in Ukraine will end when the West stops funding and arms supplies, or when the Ukrainians run out. am

          When the Ukrainian Russians, deceived by Kiev - in the face of the Russophobic dictatorship of the Jewish Nazi Zelensky, as well as the Jews Shmygal and Reznikov - run out in Ukraine, the US proxy war with Russia as "cannon fodder" will be continued by the Russophobic Nazis, the Poles, etc.
    2. +1
      April 1 2023 12: 10
      Quote from Carlos Sala
      Now we see a banking crisis, a fire in France and a strong blow to the British economy.

      And then they dragged Trump to the trial, there, too, a "small fire" could occur. And Chumaded is still sleeping and stumbling.
    3. 0
      April 1 2023 13: 32
      Quote from Carlos Sala
      They are afraid of this because they are tired of paying the destitute nation of Ukraine. Now we see a banking crisis, a fire in France and a strong blow to the British economy.

      Who is afraid of whom, this grandmother said in two.
      From a pragmatic Anglo-Saxon point of view, the war in Ukraine and everything connected with it fits well into numerous American programs to reduce the world's population, overturn the EU economy, transfer part of production to the United States, increase gas supplies and military-industrial complex products from the United States to the EU, transfer part Europe's wealth in the US and more binding of EU politicians and business to the "liberal values" of the US, etc. and so on.

      That is why old Biden, every time speaking in some next provincial town of the USA or in front of the respectable and main masters of the USA itself, always radiates optimism and a desire to run for the next presidential term in the USA. They just have everything HO-RO-SHO. good
  2. -2
    April 1 2023 12: 05
    Scholz quite openly voiced the scenario of the Ukrainian conflict being implemented by the United States. There is no victory for Ukraine in it, but the United States receives its own gesheft. And we are forced to follow it (the American plan) like a tram on rails.
    1. 0
      April 1 2023 12: 45
      Quote from: blackGRAIL
      Scholz quite openly voiced the scenario of the Ukrainian conflict being implemented by the United States. There is no victory for Ukraine in it, but the United States receives its own gesheft. And we are forced to follow it (the American plan) like a tram on rails


      Copypasta is a sign of professionalism good laughing
  3. 0
    April 1 2023 12: 11
    this will be a serious challenge for Germany... the country will do everything to support Ukraine
    This can be understood as we are ready to take off our last shirt, but to help Kyiv in any case. And he asked ordinary Germans if they were ready to sacrifice their well-being for the sake of it is not clear who and it is not clear why. Here the other day one spoke in the Bundestag and thanked Charles III for his decisive contribution to the victory over fascism (?). Those who have forgotten history, filled with hatred for Russia, will lead Germany far. Well, to hell with her if they didn’t want to live in harmony and trade with Russia.
    1. 0
      April 1 2023 12: 30
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Here the other day one spoke in the Bundestag and thanked Charles III for his decisive contribution to the victory over fascism (?).

      It will soon come to the point that the Bundestag will declare that the Union Jack (Jolly Roger) was hoisted over the Reichstag of Charles III.
    2. 0
      April 1 2023 13: 22
      Quote: rotmistr60
      And he asked ordinary Germans if they were ready to sacrifice their well-being for the sake of it is not clear who and it is not clear why.

      No. Moreover, at the Forum 2000 in the Czech Republic, German Foreign Minister Burbock spoke publicly in the vein that "It's more important for me to keep my promise to Ukraine than what the German voters think about it". Nothing more, nothing less.
      Maintenance of mattress wishlists for Scholz and his team has a much higher priority than the interests of Germany and the German people.
  4. +1
    April 1 2023 12: 14
    And if the victory of Ukraine is not expected, then who will give multibillion-dollar loans?
    1. 0
      April 1 2023 12: 40
      So that's why in the West they will hysteria - they understand that the credited person may die. And now the dilemma is to give money in the hope that the patient will survive, or is no longer worth it.
  5. +1
    April 1 2023 12: 19
    And again the question arises - is a quick victory in Tsegabonia really beneficial for Russia? After all, our main task is to get a reconciled and at least somewhat loyal population. And for this, firstly, it is necessary to somehow get rid of the stubborn Svidomites, secondly, to demonstrate that it will be better for people from the Russian Federation, and most importantly, to show very clearly that turning up one’s paw at Russia and yapping is very painful and deadly ..

    And I think so - that the first and third questions can only be resolved by inflicting maximum losses. And nothing else. A quick victory, however, leaves too many banderlogs alive, with which it is not clear what to do later, and still leaves some mrii among part of the population .. Like - we lost because the West gave us little, we were kind of not ready, damn Muscovites us deceived - well, and so on and so forth .. But they say next time - we will show them! So - you need to make it so that even at the thought of the next time the hair under the pans stands on end and the sphincter - involuntarily relaxes .. Otherwise - everything will be in vain and in a few years it will go on again. No - spanking should be as cruel and as convincing as possible.
    1. +1
      April 1 2023 12: 33
      Quote: paul3390
      Like - we lost here because the West gave us little, we were kind of not ready, the damned Muscovites deceived us - well, and so on and so forth .. But they say next time - we will show them!

      You said it right, until they are full, it will be so, they will crap until the next time. "She died so she died" there is no other way.
    2. +1
      April 1 2023 12: 46
      The war was unprofitable for Russia and the Russian people in general. It was possible and necessary to arrange industrialization, a turn to the East and a purge of the elites without any war.

      With the collapse of Ukraine, their government coped well and on its own, you could just wait, while putting things in order in your own house.

      Someone to convince, re-educate and prove something is a crazy idea and a big stupidity.

      If the war had already begun and the goal was to defeat Ukraine, this had to be done quickly and without snot.

      But if this is the first battle of the Sino-American War, then perhaps everything goes according to plan and draws resources and attention from Europe and the States, while another game is going on behind the scenes
      1. 0
        April 1 2023 13: 16
        The war was unprofitable for Russia and the Russian people in general.

        You might think - someone asked us. Alas, thanks to our wise leadership, Russia was tritely confronted with a fact - there will be a war, and it is not we who decide to start it.

        Ukrovermacht without options last spring would have popped into the Donbass, and judging by what is happening, they would have crushed it in a maximum of a month. And then - does anyone have any doubts that they would have turned to the Crimea? For the go-ahead from the regional committee has already been given. And little depended on us. One could only try to preempt the available forces.

        But how we got to all this and why everything turned out that way is a separate question ..
      2. 0
        April 4 2023 15: 07
        Quote from: parabyd
        But if this is the first battle of the Sino-American War, then perhaps everything goes according to plan and draws resources and attention from Europe and the States, while another game is going on behind the scenes

        Perhaps this is similar to the actual state of affairs.
        Only I would still not call this war a Sino-American one. China alone will not cope with America ... Russia, of course, too, alone it would be much harder.
        BUT! There is one significant difference between Russia and China. China would never START a war without having calculated the scenario in advance and completely. But Russia, most likely, did not have a clear scenario, and nevertheless risked starting ...
        I wrote it, but I myself think: after all, VVP flew to comrade SI on the eve of the start of the NWO (?) He flew ... So maybe they wrote this play together then? Could...
        Well, anyway, it's still joint the war of Russia and China (and the countries that joined them) against America (and its satellites) ...
        Something like this, I think... :)
  6. -5
    April 1 2023 12: 27
    If you keep the existing strategy "the chicken pecks by the grain", then the war will last at least 10 years.
  7. +2
    April 1 2023 12: 44
    The challenge for Germany is not at all the NWO in Ukraine for another 2-3-4 years, but the cessation of economic relations with the Russian Federation and the cessation of subsidizing the German economy at the expense of cheap Russian resources.
    And the transfer of production to the States.
    1. +1
      April 1 2023 13: 17
      Quote: Denis812
      stop economic relations with the Russian Federation and stop subsidizing the German economy at the expense of cheap Russian resources.

      Tell me, why did we need to subsidize the German economy?
      1. 0
        April 1 2023 14: 23
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Quote: Denis812
        stop economic relations with the Russian Federation and stop subsidizing the German economy at the expense of cheap Russian resources.

        Tell me, why did we need to subsidize the German economy?

        And why did the USSR need to subsidize the economy of a NATO member - Germany?
        Exactly the same reason as in 1972 - the currency is urgently needed ...
        1. 0
          April 1 2023 17: 18
          Quote: your1970
          And why did the USSR need to subsidize the economy of a NATO member - Germany?

          Did we sell them cheap resources?
  8. 0
    April 1 2023 12: 51
    German Chancellor: Conflict in Ukraine could drag on for several years
    . When there are a lot of conversations, every now and then it drags on for a long time ... alas, common truths.
  9. 0
    April 1 2023 12: 55
    Fuck him, liverwurst, sorry German Chancellor.
  10. 0
    April 1 2023 13: 00
    Eat what you defecate yourself, geyropa!
  11. +2
    April 1 2023 13: 15
    Kanclerishko tries on an oracle suit. And his girlfriend der Leyen is worried that there is no offensive...
  12. 0
    April 1 2023 13: 21
    German Chancellor believes that confrontation in Ukraine could drag on for "two, three, four years"

    Well, if only to take the Reichstag again ...
  13. 0
    April 3 2023 00: 27
    And how she was able to get into the Reichstag, it’s not clear, it’s already vangut

    Who will if you listen?!