The journalist "caught" the official representative of the UN Secretary General, who tried to deny the American presence in Syria

23
The journalist "caught" the official representative of the UN Secretary General, who tried to deny the American presence in Syria

The notorious American "double standards" are already becoming so obvious that anyone who tries to justify them finds himself in a very delicate situation.

Something similar recently happened to UN Secretary General Spokesman Farhan Haq, when during a briefing a journalist began asking him "uncomfortable" questions about the American presence in Syria and comparing the situation with Ukraine.



Thus, one of them concerned the legality of the deployment of US bases in Syrian territory. After all, Damascus did not give such permission, and even more so did not invite the Americans, just as they did not give a mandate in the UN Security Council.

In turn, Hack did not think of anything better than to try to evade the answer, saying that this is not something that “the organization is dealing with at this stage.”

When the journalist “hinted” at the illegality of the deployment of US bases in Syria, his interlocutor completely lost his temper.

Your analytics is up to you, but at this stage...

- said the representative of the UN Secretary General.

Meanwhile, the interviewer did not “retreat” and asked the question of how the situation in Syria differs from the conflict in Ukraine.

To this, Hack replied that there was “no situation” in the SAR at all, just like the US military. Stressing that he had not heard of the presence of US soldiers in Syria "on the ground."

Then the journalist recalled the recent attack on an American base in Syria, during which 5 US servicemen were injured.

It's weird, isn't it? How could they have suffered if, as you say, they are not there?

- caught the interlocutor of the representative of the UN Secretary General.

Yes…

- Hack, who was cornered, answered in confusion.

What followed was something unintelligible from the official representative of the UN Secretary General, once again emphasizing that he is either incompetent or says only what is beneficial to the US authorities.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    29 March 2023 14: 14
    once again emphasizing that either he is incompetent, or he only says what is beneficial to the US authorities.
    I doubt the incompetence of the representative, but I have 99,9% doubts about what he says to the tune of the United States.
    1. +5
      29 March 2023 14: 53
      Quote: carpenter
      I doubt the incompetence of the representative, but I have 99,9% doubts about what he says to the tune of the United States.

      So why be surprised? The residence of the UN is located on the territory of the states, and they (the UN) have long been lured and tamed ...
      I think that such an organization has the right to exist only in two cases.
      1. Or is it located on the territory of some absolutely neutral country (some kind of microscopic thread, such as the Principality of Monaco), which does not have no weapons and no global ambitions.
      2. Or - she must have residences in each, existing on the planet, country (even if it is some kind of "Mumba-Yumba" tribe), and the entire contingent periodically moves from place to place.
      Difficult? Yes, it is difficult!
      But to be the representative of all mankind is mission, not a sinecure.
      1. +6
        29 March 2023 16: 08
        Quote: Zamira
        such a UN organization has the right to exist only

        I believe that only independent states should have a vote in the UN, and there is only one criterion: There should be no foreign military bases on the territory of this country. Otherwise, this country has no opinion of its own.
        1. +2
          29 March 2023 22: 31
          Quote: Geosun
          I believe that only independent states should have a vote in the UN, and there is only one criterion: There should be no foreign military bases on the territory of this country. Otherwise, this country has no opinion of its own.

          Also an option ... In fact, probably the best option ...
          But how many such countries will be typed?
      2. 0
        30 March 2023 16: 33
        What the hell is Monaco!!!?? Only somewhere in the center of Russia, in the Krasnoyarsk Territory, for example, and from Krasnoyarsk 500 km down the Yenisei! And not a single Basurman will find them there!))
  2. +3
    29 March 2023 14: 17
    Americans are like that! It is believed that Jupiter is allowed, the bull is not allowed. And they imagine themselves to be Jupiter, not recognizing anyone's right to go their own way.
  3. +11
    29 March 2023 14: 18
    To deny the obvious is stupid, which shows that the UN is becoming obsolete.
    1. +6
      29 March 2023 14: 29
      Not that it survives. After all, what is the UN - this is a platform for discussing cases on a global scale. Her problem is not in herself, but in the fact that there is a preponderance of the opinion of the Americans.

      When the ratio of votes for and against the states equals, then the organization will come to life. And to create a new one is a whole problem. Try to drive all the countries there again
      1. +3
        29 March 2023 16: 34
        Quote from: parabyd
        The UN is a platform for discussing matters on a global scale

        Not certainly in that way. Initially, the UN as an organization approved by the victors in the Second World War (especially France lol ), was designed to prevent the outbreak of wars in the future. Later, it acquired various committees on various humanitarian issues. In thirty years, after the collapse of the USSR, it completely degenerated. As for the "revival" of the UN, I personally doubt it. The "patient" is mortally ill, it is easier to put him to sleep. Based on the results of the current confrontation, the winners will most likely create a new organization, with headquarters somewhere in Bahrain, or Dubai, in general, away from the "civilized world". Who will be the founders, guess three times.
  4. +4
    29 March 2023 14: 21
    A completely rotten office .. This is the UN secretariat. But here, apparently, "a place of demons" .. New York, you know ..
  5. +6
    29 March 2023 14: 28
    The Roman poet and writer Publius Ovid Nason (43 BC - 17 AD) wrote that "other peoples have a country with certain borders, only the Romans have the same concepts of the city and the world."
    So the penguins imagine themselves the heirs of the Romans, they believe that there are no borders for them. So in Syria, Iraq and other countries they are legal (in their opinion), naturally only to protect democracy.
  6. -11
    29 March 2023 14: 28
    So which journalist asked these questions and where? Where can you watch this interview?
    And why did he ask these questions to Farhan Haq, Deputy Spokesman for the UN Secretary General? Who is here for some reason called "the official representative of the UN Secretary General"? Does anyone even know the name of Peskov's deputy, what kind of position he is, does he answer such questions according to his position? What was this briefing about, on what topic?
    During the daily briefing by Deputy Spokesperson for the Secretary-General Farhan Haq, only a few journalists were physically present in the meeting room.


    This article has more questions than answers. Empty in terms of information, even the position was incorrectly named.
    1. +5
      29 March 2023 14: 38
      You, sir, always and everywhere have only a bunch of questions, especially when it comes to criticizing your employers! negative You work badly, everything is immediately visible! fool
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. fiv
    +3
    29 March 2023 14: 29
    Biden will deprive him of chocolate chip ice cream, and blinkin will cut the bonus. And rightly so - continue to stand on the side of good, and do not shield the ghouls!
  8. +6
    29 March 2023 14: 36
    US minions will never tell the truth that incriminates their master in crimes. Even if the can itself devours the baby in front of everyone and drinks his blood, this worm will pretend that nothing happened and he did not see anything.
    1. +3
      29 March 2023 15: 00
      Even if the can itself in front of everyone devours the baby and drinks his blood

      Before that, an information campaign will be held in the media, where the addiction to killing babies by a Biden or another representative of the American elite will be called as a completely necessary action and based on the sacrifice of a Biden, for the glory of democracy, every time he crosses over his philanthropic soul to kill a child with a monstrous family and in the future, based on information obtained from competent sources, this child will cause millions of victims, and to prevent this from happening, the expert community, including using voodoo rituals, recommended killing this little monster with the obligatory absorption of blood. After that, everyone will be given the opportunity to express their opinion, reducing over time the opportunity for the opposition to express their disagreement. And that's it - Biden is a white knight destroying small dragons that have not yet gained strength! hi
  9. +2
    29 March 2023 14: 42
    And where is the standard answer: "Well, how can you not understand, this is ANOTHER" ...?????
  10. -2
    29 March 2023 14: 49
    Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
    To deny the obvious is stupid, which shows that the UN is becoming obsolete.

    Well, if you dig a little bit into history, then the topic of "ihtamnets" did not arise today.
    By the way, do you remember where this word came from?)
    1. +3
      29 March 2023 15: 14
      Quote from sdivt
      Well, if you dig a little bit into history, then the topic of "ihtamnets" did not arise today.
      By the way, do you remember where this word came from?)

      Have they been there?
      Strange, but Ze said that the Russian Federation invaded Ukraine only in February last year ....
  11. +2
    29 March 2023 14: 51
    The office, of course, was rotten on American grubs. But it will be possible to create a new one only after a new world war, and then if the survivors find each other.
  12. +2
    29 March 2023 14: 55
    Quote from solar
    And why did he ask these questions to Farhan Haq, Deputy Spokesman for the UN Secretary General? Who for some reason was called here "the official representative of the UN Secretary General

    So you quoted in your message that he was a deputy and not an official representative, and then you are indignant.
    During the daily briefing by Deputy Spokesperson for the Secretary-General Farhan Haq
    1. 0
      29 March 2023 22: 18
      I am indignant at the absence of any semantic load in the article, it is not clear who asked, in connection with anything, or why this unknown person asked questions to the deputy press secretary.
      The latter, obviously, was also understood by the author, since he renamed him the official representatives of the General Secretary for solidity.
  13. -1
    29 March 2023 15: 21
    Quote: your1970
    Have they been there?
    Strange, but Ze said that the Russian Federation invaded Ukraine only in February last year ....

    And how in such an amazing way did you guess what I was writing about?
    There was no one anywhere, but everyone understands who and what specific place we are talking about)
    That's what it is, Aesopian language...