Alexander Lisovsky: the storm of Troubles

24
Alexander Lisovsky: the storm of Troubles
Lisovchik, Y. Kossak


Troubled times led to historical arena of many adventurers. However, in order to count on success, adventurism alone was not enough; military leadership, enterprise, courage and incredible luck were also needed. All this was in abundance by the Lithuanian gentry Alexander Lisovsky, who will be discussed.



Companion of False Dmitry II


Alexander Lisovsky came from a noble family and was born in Vilna. The date of birth is considered to be 1580, but some sources also mention 1575. Having received an education, from a young age he began military service. For several years he served in the army of the Wallachian ruler, then returned to Poland, where in 1606–1607. joined the rokosh (that is, the gentry uprising against the king) Nikolai Zebzhidovsky. For participation in rokosh, King Sigismund III outlawed Lisovsky. When the rebels were defeated, Lisovsky fled to the Moscow kingdom, where he joined with his detachment of 600 people to the army of the impostor False Dmitry II.

False Dmitry gave Lisovsky the rank of colonel, but he and his entire detachment had no salary, they had to decide all supply issues themselves. Naturally, at the expense of the local population.

Lisovsky's detachment was soon replenished with Russians and already numbered several thousand people. Subsequently, the national composition of foxes, as they will soon be called, became unusually variegated. In addition to Poles, Lithuanians and Russians, there were also Tatars, Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks, Swedish, English and German mercenaries.

The first major success of Lisovsky was the defeat of the tsarist troops of the governor Zakhary Lyapunov in the Battle of Zaraisk in March 1608. Then he made a major raid on the Ryazan lands, but in June of the same year he was defeated in the Battle of the Bear Ford and retreated to Tushino to the troops of the impostor.

After the battle at the Bear Ford, Lisovsky finally developed a tactic that allowed him to be elusive for a long time. First of all, he established strict discipline in his detachment. All his soldiers were mounted, operated without carts and guns, and all the necessary supplies were carried on horseback. Thanks to this, his detachment was distinguished by high speed, appeared in front of the enemy from nowhere and after the battle disappeared into nowhere.

The next important point is secrecy. To ensure the invisibility of the movement of his troops, Lisovsky ordered to kill everyone who met them on the way. Only the dead, he believed, would not tell the enemy in which direction his detachment had gone. During attacks on villages, everything was often cut out, only a scorched desert remained.

When attacking the tsarist troops, success was determined primarily by surprise. However, if the enemy put up strong resistance and did not flee during the first attack, Lisovsky retreated as suddenly as he appeared.


Lisovchiki. Y. Kossak

At the end of 1608, together with the hetman Sapieha, Lisovsky took part in the siege of the Trinity Monastery. In the spring of the following year, he made a new raid, took Suzdal and made it his residence. Besieged Yaroslavl, but to no avail. From Yaroslavl, Lisovsky made a trip to Kostroma, which had rebelled against False Dmitry. The assault on Kostroma also ended unsuccessfully for Lisovsky, and he retreated again.

Meanwhile, important political changes soon took place. King Sigismund officially declared war on Russia and besieged Smolensk, and the army of False Dmitry in Tushino at the beginning of 1610 finally disintegrated: the Poles went to the king near Smolensk, the Russians went to Kaluga to the impostor.

For Lisovsky, these changes meant a lot. The king forgave him, and now, from the status of a robber, he again became a royal subject.


Foxes practicing archery. Painting by Józef Brandt

In the service of the king. 1610–1616


In the spring of 1610, Lisovsky began a new campaign, the purpose of which was to reach the royal troops near Smolensk. In April, he took and plundered Rostov, after which he defeated the garrison of the Kalyazinsky monastery and went through Tver, Toropets and Velikiye Luki to Pskov. The German mercenary and author of valuable memoirs about the Time of Troubles, Konrad Bussov, describes further events as follows:

“There, the Pskovites not only received him very well, but even asked and persuaded him to stay with them for a while and help them against the Germans, who from Narva ... attacked and raided them daily. He willingly did so, and not only cleared the Pskov line of the Narva army, but by secret tricks and negotiations ensured that 500 British and 300 Irish broke away from them and joined him, after which the Narva army left the Pskovites in complete peace.
Having rendered this service to the Pskovites, Lisovsky went over to the side of the Polish king and spent this winter (from 1610 to 1611) in Voronechye.

After that, Lisovsky finally joined the king near Smolensk and in the following months played an important role in the fighting for the city, attacking Russian troops.

In 1612, at the head of a detachment of 2-3 thousand people, he made a new big campaign in the northern regions. It is known that he was able to take and plunder Vologda, after which he went towards Arkhangelsk, and for a long time there was no news from him at all. Acting in the rear, he easily evaded the pursuit of the slow tsarist troops, after which in 1614 he again returned to Smolensk.


Campaigns of Lisovsky in 1612–1614

However, the next raid of Lisovsky, made in 1615, became more famous. Its main goal was to divert the Russian troops that were besieging Smolensk, which was captured by the Poles at that time. In March, Lisovsky approached Bryansk and besieged it for 11 weeks, but due to the lack of artillery, he could not take it. Against 2 foxes, a 000-strong detachment of Prince Shakhovsky was sent. However, Lisovsky, without waiting for his approach, attacked him first and defeated him.

Concerned about the success of Lisovsky, the tsar sent his best commander against him, the hero of the Second Militia, Prince Dmitry Pozharsky. The battle between them took place at the end of August in the vicinity of the city of Orel. Having defeated the vanguard of Pozharsky, Lisovsky nevertheless could not overcome the main forces of the prince. Refusing to continue the battle, Lisovsky took Orel by storm, plundered it and burned it.

Then Lisovsky went north. With a sudden attack, he defeated the tsarist troops of the governor Fyodor Sheremetev, took Rzhev, then burned Torzhok. Having rounded a large loop around Moscow, Lisovsky ruined and plundered a number of small towns and villages. He had about 800 people left, so he could no longer take large cities, and he tried to avoid clashes with numerous Russian detachments. Despite the fact that any such clash could now be his last, Lisovsky still retained his detachment and took him in January 1616 near Smolensk - to where the campaign began.


Great Raid of 1615

For this raid, the king generously rewarded Lisovsky. For several months, the foxes stood in the Smolensk region, preparing for a new similar campaign. However, it was already realized without Lisovsky: in October 1616, he himself fell from his horse and died from his injuries.

Lisovchiki, after the death of the commander, remained as a separate detachment. They took part in the campaigns of 1617-1618, and after the conclusion of the Deulino Peace Treaty, King Sigismund sent them to fight as mercenaries of Emperor Ferdinand in the Holy Roman Empire, where the Thirty Years' War had recently begun. There they, just as before in Russia, distinguished themselves by cruelty towards the civilian population, as a result of which, two years later, the emperor refused their services.

The foxes were disbanded only in 1636.


Lisovchiki in front of the inn. Y. Brandt

Posthumous glory


Having gained fame in Russia as robbers and murderers, Lisovsky and the foxes were romanticized by many generations of Polish writers, poets and artists. The portrait of Lisovsky himself has not reached our time, but there are more than enough paintings depicting foxes. Back in the 1649th century, many poems and poems appeared, the main character of which was Lisovsky. Interestingly, the authors did not try to hide his cruelty, but, despite this, he looks like a heroic personality to them. Thus, the poet Samuil Tvardovsky wrote in XNUMX:

"Lisovsky is fighting
And like a fire leaves nothing behind,
The road is smooth and everywhere in front of him is a straight path,
Not boarding any boats and not stepping on bridges,
Through lakes and rivers and all floods,
We reached places where no Pole has ever set foot...
I reached the Ob, where the distant Golden Woman ...
He is taken first for Baba, and then for the offerings,
Having broken the idol, he took so much gold,
How much could you take…”


After 250 years, the personality of Lisowski interested another Polish poet, Stefan Zeromski. He has a gloomy picture of the war in the foreground:

"Pan Lisovsky rushes to Astrakhan itself,
To the shore of the wide Caspian Sea,
And fills the Bear Fords with blood,
And sprinkles the Trinity rock with blood,
In the Rostov church people are being killed,
Through Kostroma, Yaroslavl, Uglich, Vologda
Made it to the icy shores
Where frost compares strength with foamy waves,
Where are the icy mountains with a creak, with a crack,
They fight each other in depth.
Polish banners smash Tsar Basil,
Burning oak fortresses, chopping people at the root,
Where the cities stood, the wind carries feathers,
In the ditches, the bloody bones mourn the rain ... "
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 1 2023 07: 25
    of course, Lisovsky is an adventurer and a robber of pure water. But robbers are also lucky and even talented in military affairs. By the way, Lisovsky's detachments had all the signs of the Cossacks. There was a "circle", and there was a commander, deputies, judges, captains, lieutenants, a standard bearer, etc. So the foxes are more of a Russian invention than a Polish-Lithuanian one. "Krug" adopted its own laws, judged and pardoned. Like the Cossacks, the foxes were always light. No wagons, no convoys. All your scrub on a horse.
    And the fact that they composed songs about the robber Lisovsky in Russia, in Russia this is not an innovation. The poet Nekrasov himself glorified the robber Kudeyar in verse, and the people sang a song to these verses. As for the immortal words of Tyutchev about the severity of Russia understood by the mind, this severity in the context of today's article lies in the fact that the poets composed poems about the adventurer Lisovsky, who then wished the death of Russia, but no one wrote poems about then Russia from the death of the sleeping prince Pozharsky.
    1. +1
      April 1 2023 23: 19
      foxes have always been light. No wagons, no convoys. All your scrub on a horse.

      Hmm! ... You can go 130 versts with one long halt, but for years ..
      Do not flood us with "historians"? Well, how will 800 muzzles arrive in the northern village for dinner ... pretty bite?
  2. +4
    April 1 2023 09: 31
    For those who really study history: Zorin A.V. "Alexander Jozef Lisovsky: Hero of the Time of Troubles".
  3. +8
    April 1 2023 09: 51
    The life story and military path of Alexander Lisovsky is known and the author of the article did not add anything new.
    I would like to draw attention to the confrontation between the Pskovites and the Moscow authorities. The author casually mentioned this and nothing more.
    As in the article about Jacob Delagardie, the Novgorodians also chose their own path, separate from Moscow.
    Quote from the article:
    "he achieved that 500 British and 300 Irish broke away from them and joined him, after which the Narva army left the Pskovians completely alone" (c)
    It should be noted that in these eight hundred who defected was Georg Lermont, who then went to serve Prince Pozharsky.
    George is the founder of the noble Lermontov family.
    The very mysterious death of Lisovsky. He is not yet forty, and after falling from a horse he dies.
    The structure of the Lisovsky regiment is very interesting, thanks to which the detachment's high mobility was achieved. It could also be written about.
    1. +6
      April 1 2023 11: 09
      Quote: ee2100

      The very mysterious death of Lisovsky. He is not yet forty, and after falling from a horse he dies.

      An autopsy was not performed, there is no post-mortem epicrisis. There is no exact information about how he died.
      "And having driven twenty miles from Starodub, Lisovsky suddenly died, fell off his horse and died," the tsar's letter was reported, sent to the authorities of the Trinity-Sergius Monastery near Moscow.

      I don’t think that the “Muscovite saboteurs” poisoned him. For those times, the age is quite solid, besides constant stress, malnutrition, libations. There could be a stroke, a heart attack, thrombosis, a lot of things that could cause death.
      1. +4
        April 1 2023 14: 03
        There is no exact information about how he died.

        Why not.
        nieoczekiwanie rażony paraliżem w obozie pod Starodubnem.

        "Suddenly died of paralysis in a camp near Starodub"
        Then it was called "apoplexy." With his way of life - quite a natural end.
      2. 0
        April 1 2023 14: 20
        Stroke and thrombosis will be removed immediately.
        There may be a heart attack, but then he had not "rejuvenated" yet.
        The lifestyle is active. The food is completely ecological.
        If we exclude the human factor, then more likely a hemorrhage in the brain.
        Although....
        1. +4
          April 1 2023 14: 23
          Stroke and thrombosis will be removed immediately.
          ...
          If we exclude the human factor, then more likely a hemorrhage in the brain.

          You are clearly not a doctor. Stroke (hemorrhagic) - this is a hemorrhage in the brain, apoplexy.
          1. 0
            April 1 2023 22: 48
            I agree, but I did not mean a stroke in its classic form now.
            Apoplexy with a snuffbox and it's not from there.
            1. 0
              April 2 2023 13: 19
              "Apoplexy with a snuffbox" - is this about the death of Paul I?
        2. +2
          April 1 2023 17: 54
          If he led a typical lifestyle of a gentry of those times, with an endless series of feasts and libations, then it is not surprising. Yes, and a lot depends on heredity, as my teachers at the university said: human health is 70% dependent on heredity, 20% on lifestyle, and the level of health care development accounts for only about 10% (but very important, because there are a lot of acute conditions that the body itself is unlikely to be able to cope without help).
      3. +3
        April 1 2023 15: 25
        "And having driven twenty versts from Starodub, Lisovsky suddenly died, fell off his horse and died,"
        An ambiguous interpretation of death - he first died, and then fell, or vice versa - first he fell, then he died? I remember the film "Maxim Perepelitsa" where, before landing, Maxim (artist Leonid Bykov) talks about smoking: - "but he had a neighbor who quit smoking and died. However, he seemed to have died first, and then quit smoking."
        1. +1
          April 1 2023 23: 08
          Quote: Aviator_
          An ambiguous interpretation of death - he first died, and then fell, or vice versa - first he fell, then he died?

          what It is a thankless task to make diagnoses if you yourself are not a doctor, and even according to historical records.
          In ancient Egyptian mummies, if I am not mistaken, they found traces of sarcoma. Relatively recently, people were dying, and diagnostic methods have not yet detected oncology.
          Stroke, in addition to hemorrhagic, is ischemic, often of a mixed type. The man is showing signs of life. From a blood clot, instant death is possible. If you didn’t know about a disease before, it doesn’t mean that it didn’t exist.
          Quote: Aviator_
          I remember the film "Maxim Perepelitsa" where, before landing, Maxim (artist Leonid Bykov) talks about smoking: - "but he had a neighbor who quit smoking and died. However, he seemed to have died first, and then quit smoking."

          Nothing is more motivating to get rid of bad habits than a medical diagnosis.
          Human life is a fatal disease.
    2. +5
      April 1 2023 13: 52
      The life story and military path of Alexander Lisovsky is known and the author of the article did not add anything new.

      Moreover, the author is also lying.
      Having gained fame in Russia as robbers and murderers, Lisovsky and the foxes were romanticized by many generations of Polish writers, poets and artists.

      There was no "romanticization" of the "foxes" in Poland.
      For example.
      ...podjazdową, prowadził łupieskie wyprawy w rejonie Moskwy i Suzdala, spustoszył ziemię riazańską i Powołże[

      led predatory expeditions in the region of Moscow and Suzdal, ravaged the lands of Ryazan and the Volga region

      This is from Janin Hoder's Biographical Dictionary of Polish History, 2005 edition
      The tendency to lie is the signature style of this author.
      1. +6
        April 1 2023 14: 14
        The tendency to lie is the signature style of this author
        Alas, alas, us. smile
  4. +3
    April 1 2023 14: 20
    On Wikipedia, the fox tactics are described, interesting: first, shelling from bows, when approaching from pistols, such a combination of horse archers and reiters ...
  5. +1
    April 1 2023 16: 48
    Good afternoon!
    Thanks to the Author for the article, but I have questions for him:
    1. The article says that the foxes took part in the events of the Troubles and were mercenaries
    Ferdinand II. Or maybe they also took part in the wars with Sweden and in the Smolensk war?
    2. The article says that their detachment was disbanded in 1636. And what could be the reason for the disbandment of such a detachment with such a reputation?
    3. Interestingly, after the death of Lisovsky, who led the foxes?
    If anything, colleagues, I asked these questions purely out of interest.
    Have a nice day!
    1. +1
      April 1 2023 20: 26
      Good evening all!
      Let me answer my own questions:
      1. Unfortunately, I did not find information about their participation in the war with Sweden and in the Smolensk war.
      If someone finds information and adds, then a big thank you from me and my plus!
      2. In 1636, the detachment was disbanded by a special decree of the Seimas. Apparently tired of the robberies of dashing warriors, who often robbed their own population.
      3. Fox commanders:
      Alexander Lisovsky (1604-1616)
      Stanislav Chaplinsky (1616-1617)
      Valentin Rogovsky (1617-1619)
      Yarosh Kletskovsky (1619)
      Stanislav Rusinovsky (1619-1636)

      Ps 1. The questions hinted at what has been repeatedly said above: in more detail, please!
      2. If anything, below is the source where I looked at the answers to my questions:
      Lisovichki - Wikipedia.
      Have a nice day!
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    April 2 2023 00: 15
    In the Arkhangelsk province, they reached Yemetsk and the Antoniev-Siya Monastery, received a full blow-off and turned back.
    It is 170 km from Arkhangelsk.
    1. 0
      April 2 2023 15: 48
      This raid speaks volumes about how unpunished they were. Yes, and they robbed it decently ...
  7. +1
    April 2 2023 14: 50
    It is a pity that he died a natural death, and not on the gallows or on a stake. It would at least somehow brighten up his ,, exploits ,,. An ordinary sadist and bandit from the high road. Destroyed entire villages, here we are not talking about any chivalry.
  8. 0
    10 May 2023 17: 02
    They hinted to the people that somewhere they have a hidden Lisovsky. If they don't go to die it will be bad.
  9. 0
    17 May 2023 07: 45
    It is possible that the Author used as a source of inspiration for his work on Pan Lisovsky the verses of the Polish writers of the 18th and 19th centuries mentioned by him. similar stories were written by retired Swedish colonels about the Vikings after Peter's failed campaigns.
  10. 0
    9 June 2023 09: 59
    Alexander Jozef Lisovsky is certainly a talented military leader of the Time of Troubles. That's just, the success of his raids were largely predetermined by the weakness of tsarist power in Russia and the sluggishness, and sometimes the unpreparedness of the Russian troops opposing him. Having frolicked enough in the vastness of the Russian kingdom, he rightly went down in history as a murderer and a villain.