NATO military in Kosovo took precautions when using depleted uranium projectiles

21
NATO military in Kosovo took precautions when using depleted uranium projectiles

During the NATO operation in Yugoslavia, NATO military personnel operating in Kosovo took precautions when using depleted uranium projectiles. The servicemen were forbidden to touch the equipment lined with such ammunition.

This was reported in the Italian newspaper il Fatto Quotidiano.



Journalists from Italy said that the inspection of the destroyed Yugoslav equipment was carried out exclusively in special protective equipment. Also, the military personnel of the NATO contingent were forbidden to use water in the area where shells with depleted uranium were used.


Earlier it was reported about the intention of the British authorities to transfer similar ammunition to the Ukrainian military. They contain depleted uranium cores that improve the armor-piercing properties of the projectile. They are intended to be used in tanks Challenger 2, which the British are going to hand over to the Armed Forces.

In an interview with Serbian Radio and Television, the Minister of Health of this Balkan state, Danica Grujicic, spoke about the consequences of the use of depleted uranium ammunition by NATO troops in 1999. After their use among the inhabitants of the region, the number of cases of infertility, cancer and other pathologies has significantly increased. The official called the actions of Western countries in Yugoslavia an inhuman experiment on people. She has an excellent understanding of what she is talking about, as she is one of the leading oncologists in Serbia.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    27 March 2023 09: 29
    It is necessary to spray porridge from spent fuel rods and the active zone of spent reactors over small Britain. Vaughn Donskoy was removed from the photo ... There is more than enough material. Plus, drain the sludge from the primary circuit into the mouth of the Thames. Let them know how safe it is
    1. Mwg
      +4
      27 March 2023 09: 57
      There is no need to spray anything. The most liberal liberal, Comrade Sakharov, even when he was a "great scientist" proposed a model of a nuclear dirty bomb. So: the invention of the most liberal liberal should be sent to the fathers of liberalism. Let them rejoice and glorify for such a wonderful liberal invention
      1. 0
        27 March 2023 13: 12
        The official called the actions of Western countries in Yugoslavia an inhuman experiment on people.

        The Anglo-Saxons do not consider the Slavs to be people and this must be understood!
    2. 0
      27 March 2023 17: 45
      I don’t understand why submarines are to be disposed of. Fill it with radioactive waste, install a local control system and a self-explosion system, and on a good journey to the shores of even Britain, even Australia, even the United States.
      And on the spot bang! Goodbye healthy inhabitants of countries hostile to us. Hello people with 2 heads and 6 legs!
  2. +5
    27 March 2023 09: 31
    All this pack does not care about ecology 404, for this reason they do not accept products from Kosovo in the EU (uranium in the composition). Do not go to the fortune teller.
    1. +6
      27 March 2023 09: 38
      The pack of course do not care, but to us? Still, these are already the territories of Russia - the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. How can we answer the British and will we want to answer?
      1. +3
        27 March 2023 09: 49
        The British will have to respond with Russian shells with depleted uranium - "Lead".
        They are armed.
        Without them, it will be difficult to break through the forehead of the Challengers.
        1. +9
          27 March 2023 09: 55
          Something does not inspire me to respond to the British with depleted uranium shells on their territory, if it were on British territory, then there would be no questions.
        2. +7
          27 March 2023 09: 56
          the British need not for Challengers, but for London "Lead" am
  3. +2
    27 March 2023 09: 35
    And there are no other armor-piercing ones for the Challengers. There are only shells with uranium.
    1. +1
      27 March 2023 09: 52
      Quote from bombaher
      And there are no other armor-piercing ones for the Challengers. There are only shells with uranium.

      what Allegedly, the cost of producing an armor-piercing projectile with a depleted uranium metal core is cheaper than the cost of the same projectile made of tungsten carbide, and the effect of destruction is higher.
    2. +2
      27 March 2023 10: 00
      This is a clear indication that the British do not plan to use their tanks on their own lands.
    3. +2
      27 March 2023 11: 03
      The stump is clear, the whole "enlightened Europe" is thugs who only rob others, a gang.
      They don’t care what it will be with some Indian or Vietnamese ...
  4. 0
    27 March 2023 10: 09
    Alas.
    Both wars and special operations are generally dangerous.
    And if Uranium scrap is 10-20% more efficient, then all countries produce them, whoever can ....
    The old slogan: die today, so I tomorrow, it is often used under imperialism...
  5. +1
    27 March 2023 10: 13
    NATO military in Kosovo took precautions when using depleted uranium projectiles
    Did you clean up after each shot with a broom and a vacuum cleaner? Why do the Italians and not only military personnel who were there at that time have so many complaints about their diseases?
  6. +1
    27 March 2023 10: 23
    NATO military in Kosovo took precautions when using depleted uranium projectiles
    . It is clear that internal security regulations applied only to "white people"!
  7. +1
    27 March 2023 10: 38
    the use of weapons from radioactive materials on the territory of Ukraine - once again speaks of the misanthropic nature of both Anglo-Saxonism and Ukrainianism
    1. 0
      27 March 2023 11: 04
      Give some radical Indians or Irish crackers with dirty uranium.
      Let's clap in London. For prevention.

      And no, this is not terrorism.
      This is a return visit (according to the amount of what they did, they would be vitrified at all). This is basic POLITENESS.
      1. 0
        27 March 2023 17: 57
        First of all, it is necessary to destroy the transport routes for the delivery of weapons and ammunition from the west to the outskirts.
        If the armament did not reach the outskirts, then there would be no need to worry about how to deal with it.
  8. +2
    27 March 2023 11: 42
    Uranus does not know the difference between people, it strikes everything in a row and not only in Kosovo, but through the air throughout Serbia. Italian soldiers fell ill with oncological en masse, in this region there were a lot of uranium shells. They filed a lawsuit in Italy and received damages for health reasons.
    If the Khazar Jew Zelensky takes away such a weapon, DOES IT MEAN THAT HE WANTS TO DESTROY EVERYTHING IN LIDE IN LITTLE RUSSIA, OR IS THIS A TASK FOR HIS ???
    A general who uses such weapons on his land is either a complete idiot or simply an enemy of the people and his own.
    The worst thing is that this weapon KILLS QUIETLY, AND THE OUTBREAK OF DEATH AND DISEASE AFTER 15-20 YEARS. Even children are born with cancer!!!
    1. -1
      27 March 2023 11: 53
      And the Italian soldiers are exchanged for every few months and still get sick, it’s enough to be there for a few weeks and you are already doomed.