The work of the loitering munition "Lancet" against camouflaged equipment in the Artemovsky direction got into the frame

10
The work of the loitering munition "Lancet" against camouflaged equipment in the Artemovsky direction got into the frame

In the course of the ongoing offensive in the Artemovsk direction of the Russian army, to defeat the priority targets of the enemy, they are successfully used drones- Kamikaze "Lancet", thanks to which the militants of the Kyiv regime suffer heavy losses in manpower and military equipment.

At the same time, the Russian fighters themselves state that the number of drones has increased significantly. But the enemy has at least no less different types of UAVs.



The drone hit the camouflaged equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.




Loitering munitions "Lancet" are high-tech kamikaze drones capable of hitting their intended targets with high accuracy. The explosive power of the Lancet is quite enough to destroy enemy artillery systems and even lightly armored military equipment. Although there is also a discussion about a possible increase in the mass of the warhead.

The maximum speed of the latest modification of the Russian kamikaze drone (Lancet-3) is 110 km/h in level flight and 300 km/h when diving at a target. The range of loitering ammunition is 40-50 km. The mass of the UAV does not exceed 12 kg, of which the mass of the high-explosive fragmentation warhead is about 5 kg. The drone is capable of staying in the air for about an hour.

Due to the unusual X-shaped placement of the wings, the Lancet is extremely maneuverable and has a significant advantage over the American analogue - the Switchblade drone in diving.

"Lancet" is often used in tandem with reconnaissance drone "Orlan", with the help of which targets for subsequent defeat are determined. The Lancet is also equipped with an anti-laser defense system that makes it much more difficult to intercept or destroy this drone.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    24 March 2023 11: 14
    To be honest, there is no disguise of goals. Even the masknets are not stretched. Tracks of caterpillars are distinct. Come and strike. Possibly decoys.
    1. +2
      24 March 2023 11: 33
      denplot hi, from the ground you won’t see digging on the top, you won’t be able to get an ATGM, but from the air at the level of modern drones, satellites, a camouflage net will not help. So they don't try.
    2. +2
      24 March 2023 12: 18
      Quote: denplot
      Possibly decoys.

      This opinion also arose .. No fire, no slightest detonation, no black smoke. A persistent feeling of some kind of unnaturalness. Yes
      1. +3
        24 March 2023 16: 11
        Quote: LIONnvrsk
        No fire, no detonation, no black smoke. Persistent feeling of some kind of unnaturalness

        And you wanted like in Hollywood? There is a sea of ​​flame and smoke, and detonation, and so on, even an ordinary grenade explodes like twenty kilograms of explosives paired with a barrel of gasoline. Life is often not so spectacular.
        1. +3
          26 March 2023 14: 36
          Yes, people are used to it, like in Hollywood, they just forgot how to think with their heads that when attacked, even with a Lancet, they will scatter like plywood over Paris
  2. +1
    24 March 2023 11: 23
    Nets do not seem to help the APU. There was an article not so long ago, they say they found a panacea against the Lancets. However, all the latest videos show that the nets have not taken root, or should they be pulled into scrap?
  3. +1
    24 March 2023 11: 25
    Ha-rra-sho flies in, without noise and dust, it's nice to see.
  4. +1
    24 March 2023 11: 33
    Loitering ammunition "Lancet" has become the star of Russian weapons. He gives a very good result, he needs to expand his destructive power in order to destroy heavy tanks.
    1. +5
      24 March 2023 11: 59
      Carlos Hall hi, it is better to increase the number of Lancets themselves and operators.
  5. 0
    24 March 2023 13: 31
    I agree with the comments above, the goals are probably false. To complete the picture, there is not enough inscription - "I am the goal." But there are no questions about the work of the Lancet.