Svetlana Alliluyeva: “My father would have shot me for what I did”

22
Svetlana Alliluyeva: “My father would have shot me for what I did”


Show "Svetlana"!


In March of this year, in connection with the 70th anniversary of Stalin's death, the American studio iHeartRadio distributed the radio show Svetlana! Svetlana! It enthusiastically tells about the life of the leader's daughter Svetlana Alliluyeva (1926–2011) in the United States after her flight from India in 1967. The author of the show Dan Kitrosser, admiring her, called Svetlana his muse.



Kitroser states that “she was a big person, a heroic person. She walked along stories in so many different ways! Alliluyeva, Peters - these were just its different facets. Therefore, the surname is not the main thing here. She, recall, in 1970 changed her name, surname and abandoned her patronymic, becoming Lana Peters.

But it turns out that Alliluyeva was not at all averse to visiting even Stalinist Albania. More precisely, in March 1983, some Yugoslav media briefly reported that Svetlana Alliluyeva requested a visa - through the Albanian embassy in Cuba - to visit Albania.

Apparently, she wanted to visit this country on March 5: as you know, in communist Albania it was a day of mourning from 1953 to 1990. inclusive. But she was refused. Moreover, the refusal was accompanied, allegedly, by the comment of the “Albanian Stalin” - Enver Hoxha, addressed to her:

"We do not forgive children who betray their parents."

Such a harsh assessment of the personality of Svetlana Alliluyeva by the Tirana was due not only to her well-known speeches in the 60s - 80s, with hard-to-explain negativity against her father, with numerous allegations of his direct involvement in the repressions of the 1930s - early 50s. x years.

A combination of special services


Enver Hoxha believed that the so-called "flight" of S. Alliluyeva from the USSR was a Jesuit combination of the KGB, aimed at further discrediting I.V. Stalin. Say, not Khrushchev or Mikoyan with Suslov, but Stalin's daughter herself testifies to "Stalinist terrorism" - how can you not believe her?

This assessment coincides with the FBI dossier on Svetlana Alliluyeva, partially declassified in 2012. This part of the dossier states that

"... the Soviet government, which at that time was engaged in debunking Stalin's "personality cult", calmly reacted to Svetlana's flight to the West, as this would discredit the name of Stalin himself and his family members."

That's why and "there is no evidence that the KGB conducted surveillance of Alliluyeva in the United States." According to Albanian and Chinese sources, the KGB knew that it intended to go to the West through India. But, as Enver Hoxha noted:

“She was still given the opportunity to go to India, and moreover, they actually stopped monitoring her in India. The KGB also knew that she had taken with her a version of the manuscript of her first anti-Stalinist book, soon titled "20 Letters to a Friend."

After the resignation of Khrushchev, the question arose of the "partial rehabilitation" of Stalin, including the return of the name Stalingrad to Volgograd, as well as the installation of a bust of Stalin on his "new" grave. However, the Brezhnev leadership did not seek such solutions. Even by May 9, 1965, a bust of Stalin was not installed on that grave: this took place only in May 1970.


Not a word more


Therefore, not a word was said about the possibility of the aforementioned decisions in Brezhnev's report at the XXIII Congress of the CPSU (1966). And, according to Khoja, in order to "confirm" the commitment of the post-Khrushchev authorities to condemn a certain "cult of personality", it was decided to condone the movement of Alliluyeva to the West with her manuscripts.

It is characteristic in this regard that shortly before her departure to India, KGB officers in January 1967 beat up a delegation of students and graduate students of the PRC (see photo) near Lenin's mausoleum, who tried to lay wreaths at the mausoleum and at Stalin's grave.


By doing so, Hoxha notes, Moscow signaled that there would be no revision of Khrushchev's anti-Stalinist policy.

Soon Alliluyeva ended up in India. There, the runaway daughter of the leader in March 1967 first applied to the government of the country with a request to obtain Indian citizenship. But the Soviet side insisted that Alliluyeva be denied her request. I note that Stalin's streets are still preserved in India - in the towns of Ambatur (pictured), Kochi and Puttucheri.


The press of the pro-Stalinist Communist Party of India (which broke away from the pro-Soviet Indian Communist Party in 1964) noted that Moscow probably feared that Alliluyeva, while in India, would “cross over” to the PRC, which supported and, it seems, still supports the pro-Stalinist Indian Communist Party. But Ms. Alliluyeva preferred "transit" through India to the US.

Is the version indisputable?


In favor of the version of the "organized escape" of Stalin's daughter, E. Hodge also notes that the KGB in no way interfered with her activities in the West. The same is noted in the mentioned FBI dossier.

And her anti-Stalinist escapades and libels were aimed "and at discrediting the policy of the PRC and Albania to protect Stalin from Khrushchev's and" pro-Khrushchev's "falsifications." In connection with these factors, the Albanian leader expressed a reasonable suspicion that the KGB operation to move Alliluyeva to the West "certainly was coordinated with the CIA."


Svetlana Alliluyeva, aka Lana Peters, 2010

It is characteristic that the mentioned Albanian version of the scenario of the "flight" of Stalin's daughter to the West was not refuted either in the USSR or in the West, nor was it refuted by S. Alliluyeva herself...

But in her last years she lived not in respectable apartments in the USA, Great Britain and Switzerland, as in the 70s and early 90s, but ... in the American Richland almshouse. Where did she die...

Meanwhile, the daughter of I. V. Stalin, even in her last years, expressed hatred for the USSR, Russia, and for everything Russian and Soviet. Although her deliberately notorious "anti-Stalinism", ordered to her by American sponsors-political consultants back in the 1960s, has long been, as they say, out of circulation.

"Father would shoot me for what I did"

- the daughter of the leader admitted to reporters in 1983 ...
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    23 March 2023 03: 53
    Well, Vasily Iosifovich turned out to be much more persistent ... For which he was quietly killed.
    1. +7
      23 March 2023 04: 25
      Hodge:

      "We do not forgive children who betray their parents."
      This muddy Svetlana .....
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      23 March 2023 04: 49
      - An unbalanced woman with mental disorders, who has been running from her, any, past all her life. Broken life since childhood...

      —-What kind of plans could the KGB carry out through it, unpredictable and not controlled ...

      - And the squint and the testing look - Stalin's!
    4. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +13
    23 March 2023 05: 56
    She was cunning .... .... Her father would not have shot her, but would have cursed. So rather. But she was afraid to admit it.
    In general, the sixties generation that ruined the country is a generation cursed by both ancestors and descendants.
    1. +5
      23 March 2023 07: 58
      In general, the sixties generation that ruined the country is a generation cursed by both ancestors and descendants.
      Quite right. Shestiderasty - a generation that thinks that "cottage cheese is made from dumplings" (I. Ilf, E. Petrov). "For all the good against all the bad."
  4. +1
    23 March 2023 05: 57
    "The son is not responsible for his father," Stalin once said. The same can be said about the daughter.

    The story is bad and vague. Why did the daughter of Stalin himself go abroad? Did you hate your father? So he was no more. So she felt bad here (so they did) or she was kicked out.

    I mean, not everything depended on her personal choice. It is obvious that someone very powerful helped to make this choice.
    1. +5
      23 March 2023 15: 55
      It is obvious that someone very powerful helped to make this choice.
      N.S. Khrushchev, was friends with Stalin's wife, Alliluyeva, she contributed, while she was alive, to his career. Not a bad relationship in the future, he developed with Svetlana .. So that ... everything can be ..
  5. +3
    23 March 2023 06: 01
    "My father would have shot me for what I did"
    An apple from an apple tree, rolled far ..
    1. +7
      23 March 2023 07: 04
      Quote: parusnik
      An apple from an apple tree, rolled far ..

      It often happens when a father is "married" at work (and here, in general, the whole family is a whole country, and even with such problems), then children raised by not quite adequate mothers grow up so that sometimes it becomes simply scary.
      PySy Take the same Bondarchuk Jr. ...
  6. +7
    23 March 2023 06: 33
    Is she worth writing about?
    1. +3
      23 March 2023 08: 47
      Is she worth writing about?
      Unfortunately, this is also part of our history.
      Those who do not remember their history are doomed to repeat it.
      George Santayana
  7. +2
    23 March 2023 07: 35
    The daughters of rulers are always one punishment and a headache for them...
  8. +11
    23 March 2023 07: 57
    It is not known exactly who, and why, helped her escape from the USSR, but as a person and daughter, she is of course ......... not a good person. What is in the family cannot be taken out of the house, much less publicly watering the father with slops, for the amusement of the Western man in the street. And as a mother, she turned out to be a decent bitch, abandoned her children.
    Joseph and Catherine, having hit the West. And the men, in her life, have changed immeasurably. All together, characterizes her as a spoiled, immoral, unprincipled person. God is her judge, in the next world he will give an answer, but people have long passed their verdict.
  9. +4
    23 March 2023 08: 15
    but the West failed to make a global anti-Stalinist out of Svetlana Alliluyeva. Yes, and "not hungry" in this regard was the West. The West did not need a greater anti-Stalinist than Khrushchev. And it was more useful for the West if this anti-Stalinist sits at the top of power in the USSR than Stalin's daughter lives privately in America. Any renunciation of parents smacks of mental illness and extreme selfishness. In American society, too, such steps are not welcome. More harm, if we talk about the children of leaders, for the USSR and for Russia was brought from his father by Khrushchev's son Sergei, who did not refuse, but moved to America, than Svetlana Alliluyeva, who also abandoned her father, who also moved to America.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      23 March 2023 08: 54
      : in the mentality, the state treated its own blatantly and badly in any way ..
      beloved stepmother.
      (well, what is it (they interfered everywhere (they pursued (relentlessly obstructed (quietly drove, driven into loneliness, tragedy (

      : grew up in chopped rudeness, unkindness, dislike (didn’t babysit (rushed about (weak (broke (broke (broke (lived as best she could, as best she could) (didn’t trust (loved as best she could, as best she could (tragedy (
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +2
    23 March 2023 12: 37
    Nobody needs a meaningless life...
  12. 0
    24 March 2023 07: 56
    As the saying goes, no betrayal goes unrewarded.
  13. +1
    27 March 2023 13: 25
    From a human point of view, Alliluyeva can be understood. It was difficult for her to put into her head how one could eat today at the same table with some cheliks and drink healthy drinks with them, receive them and their wives as guests, and tomorrow put these cheliks into fertilizer for the garden and the wives who could treat the little "Sitanka" with sweets, for example, send them to the camps, sir, for about 15 years. For her, all this could be a festival of game and madness, but in general it was such ..
  14. 0
    30 March 2023 08: 24
    It's bad when a person has nothing to do. Beneficial to society. For this reason, they grow. As before, so now.
  15. 0
    April 1 2023 05: 11
    Like there's something wrong with going where you want to go. It is strange even the discussion "to give - not to leave." This is not the point, but why others who wanted to leave were not allowed to leave. And the state (not to be confused with the country), from which people flee by any means at the risk of their lives, swim across bays with sharks, swim in the sea for a week, etc., is not worth much. Well, she had a point of view - she expressed it.
  16. -1
    27 May 2023 08: 10
    The bloody ghoul and murderer Dzhugashvili spared no one. Svetlana did the right thing by escaping from the Gulag country.
    1. 0
      27 May 2023 12: 29
      So, the perestroika, having re-read "Spark", drew himself. Or a later edition, bulkhead fool.
  17. 0
    25 August 2023 10: 27
    "My father would have shot me for what I did." And it would be right...