Nobel Peace Prize: the winners, puzzling
And the year 2012 was the year when the real storm struck. The germ of the storm arose, it would seem, from nothing. Representative gentlemen for a long time could not decide on who exactly to give into the hands of the cherished bills along with the famous medal, which adorns the profile of the founding father of the prize fund Alfred Nobel. These gentlemen thought, thought, and came to a striking thought: to endow with the status of a Nobel laureate not an individual or even a group of comrades with pacifist inclinations, but a whole union. And it would be okay if it was a union of fans to bury the axes of war or the union of the protection of finches at the hands of vile poachers, but there is no - the European Union. Yes, yes ... The very European Union in whose territory the leaders of the terrorist world find their refuge. The same European Union, in which “peaceful” tear gas, “peaceful” batons and “peaceful” rubber bullets, disperse demonstrations against job cuts, reducing social guarantees. And the same European Union, the streets of notorious cities that Nazi criminals walk around, and not just want, but also don a Nazi uniform, wave flags, cling Nazi awards on the chest for executions and torture of civilians during the Second World War.
It was the European Union that the obliging Scandinavians awarded an honorary medal together with 1,2 million dollars for the further development of peace initiatives. Let The Hague improve its justice, according to which the Serbian military “criminals” receive thirty-year prison sentences, but which with suspicious systematicity does not find the corpus delicti in the actions of the Albanian punitive detachments in Kosovo. Let the European Union continue to sponsor "democratic" forces in Libya, Syria and other countries, so much so that after such "sponsorship" thousands of civilians are sent to the forefathers ...
However, is it worth making claims to the decisions of the Nobel Committee solely about the decision of the 2012 model of the year? .. Has all the Nobel laureates been indispensable for the global pacifism before? World ", you can consider several winners of the Peace Prize of the past.
Year 1906. The American President Theodore Roosevelt becomes the Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Peace Prize - Roosevelt ... The man who took the most active part in the course of the American-Spanish war for the redistribution of property in the West Indies. As a result of that war, the United States acquired Puerto Rico, Cuba, the island of Guam and other territories as its colonies. The famous "dashing horsemen" regiment, which Roosevelt himself created, took part in the most "peaceful" actions in 1898. The Nobel Committee in 1906 decided not to recall the colonial ambitions of the United States and its current president and awarded Roosevelt for his participation in the signing of the Portsmouth Peace Treaty. The epithet “peace” treaty here can be challenged in itself, because, in fact, this treaty was directed exclusively against the interests of one of the parties to the Russian-Japanese war, namely Russia. But the Nobel experts, obviously, were guided precisely by the word "peaceful", and therefore Theodore Roosevelt received a new title for himself from the world pacifist No. XXUMX.
Year 1953. Nobel Peace Prize receives American General George Marshall. The award was given to this gentleman for a plan named after Marshall, according to which effective restoration of Europe was supposed. Well, well, the restoration of Europe is obviously the case of the Nobel Committee, which is more taken into account than the participation of Marshall in the preparation of the atomic attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One thing is that this American soldier was related to the worst bombing of the whole history humanity, gave the right to bring him to international criminal responsibility. But American citizens in terms of this kind of responsibility are completely inviolable. But the world awards cling to them, thanks to the amazing courtesy of the Scandinavian “distributors” of gratitude for peace. In general, Marshall - "peacemaker" with a capital letter ...
However, that we are all about Europeans and Americans. After all, the Nobel Committee donated peace awards to our compatriots, one of whom was Mikhail Gorbachev.
1990 year. Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, during which irreversible processes began on the territory of a huge country, which led to a colossal crisis. Where people of different nationalities lived in harmony with each other for decades, centers of interethnic tensions began to emerge, leading to a large fire that continues to burn in some regions of the former Soviet Union a couple of decades later. Mikhail Gorbachev is the laureate of the Peace Prize, who, through a series of political steps, has literally led half a world to a real humanitarian catastrophe that has touched tens of millions of people.
Year 2000. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded to the United Nations. Less than a year has passed since the NATO bombers, with the tacit consent of this organization, ironed the Serbian cities, leaving thousands of Serbian citizens homeless. At that time, the United Nations was renamed the Organization of Separated Nations and an accomplice of armed conflicts in the very center of Europe. But the United Nations, instead, as it should be in a progressive democratic environment, was awarded ... Not just awarded, but also the real Nobel Prize.
Year 2009. Noted as a winner and Barack Obama. Awarded the American President "For extraordinary efforts in strengthening international diplomacy and cooperation between nations." And the actions were really extraordinary ... Especially after Obama won the prize. Real chaos swept North Africa and the Middle East. The world has never in the new millennium stood so close to the abyss of global war. Apparently, the Nobel Peace Prize has become for the American president a kind of pass to the world where you can do whatever you want: from the bombing of peaceful cities to the destruction of foreign leaders under undoubted pacifist slogans.
If the creative work of the Nobel Committee is enough, then soon we can expect the presentation of a peace prize, for example, NATO. Why? On the "peacekeeping" operations of the North Atlantic Alliance, you can lay down odes ...
And, seriously, the very idea of awarding peace after awarding the above-mentioned persons and structures has obviously outlived its usefulness and needs serious reform. After all, the modern approach to awarding more closely resembles backstage games, in which prizes are often distributed to those who are least worthy of them. Being on the same list with Mother Teresa of Barack Obama with the European Union is a mockery of the memory of Mother Teresa herself, and of the memory of all those people who actually entered the annals of history as fighters for peace and justice.
Information