Nobel Peace Prize: the winners, puzzling

43
For some time, the Nobel Peace Prize was a real recognition of the merits in the cause of peace, the strengthening of friendship between individual nations, the use of the ideas of humanism and an unparalleled attitude to the fulfillment of their social duty. At least, this prestigious award, which, since the beginnings of the 20th century, has been handed over to the purely elected, has just such a status. At the same time, the Nobel Peace Prize (like the Nobel Prize in Literature) possessed a high degree of subjectivity. Although for a number of years about the subjectivity in determining the award winners, of course, it was, but to a special mass discontent it still did not reach.

And the year 2012 was the year when the real storm struck. The germ of the storm arose, it would seem, from nothing. Representative gentlemen for a long time could not decide on who exactly to give into the hands of the cherished bills along with the famous medal, which adorns the profile of the founding father of the prize fund Alfred Nobel. These gentlemen thought, thought, and came to a striking thought: to endow with the status of a Nobel laureate not an individual or even a group of comrades with pacifist inclinations, but a whole union. And it would be okay if it was a union of fans to bury the axes of war or the union of the protection of finches at the hands of vile poachers, but there is no - the European Union. Yes, yes ... The very European Union in whose territory the leaders of the terrorist world find their refuge. The same European Union, in which “peaceful” tear gas, “peaceful” batons and “peaceful” rubber bullets, disperse demonstrations against job cuts, reducing social guarantees. And the same European Union, the streets of notorious cities that Nazi criminals walk around, and not just want, but also don a Nazi uniform, wave flags, cling Nazi awards on the chest for executions and torture of civilians during the Second World War.

It was the European Union that the obliging Scandinavians awarded an honorary medal together with 1,2 million dollars for the further development of peace initiatives. Let The Hague improve its justice, according to which the Serbian military “criminals” receive thirty-year prison sentences, but which with suspicious systematicity does not find the corpus delicti in the actions of the Albanian punitive detachments in Kosovo. Let the European Union continue to sponsor "democratic" forces in Libya, Syria and other countries, so much so that after such "sponsorship" thousands of civilians are sent to the forefathers ...

However, is it worth making claims to the decisions of the Nobel Committee solely about the decision of the 2012 model of the year? .. Has all the Nobel laureates been indispensable for the global pacifism before? World ", you can consider several winners of the Peace Prize of the past.

Year 1906. The American President Theodore Roosevelt becomes the Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Peace Prize - Roosevelt ... The man who took the most active part in the course of the American-Spanish war for the redistribution of property in the West Indies. As a result of that war, the United States acquired Puerto Rico, Cuba, the island of Guam and other territories as its colonies. The famous "dashing horsemen" regiment, which Roosevelt himself created, took part in the most "peaceful" actions in 1898. The Nobel Committee in 1906 decided not to recall the colonial ambitions of the United States and its current president and awarded Roosevelt for his participation in the signing of the Portsmouth Peace Treaty. The epithet “peace” treaty here can be challenged in itself, because, in fact, this treaty was directed exclusively against the interests of one of the parties to the Russian-Japanese war, namely Russia. But the Nobel experts, obviously, were guided precisely by the word "peaceful", and therefore Theodore Roosevelt received a new title for himself from the world pacifist No. XXUMX.

Year 1953. Nobel Peace Prize receives American General George Marshall. The award was given to this gentleman for a plan named after Marshall, according to which effective restoration of Europe was supposed. Well, well, the restoration of Europe is obviously the case of the Nobel Committee, which is more taken into account than the participation of Marshall in the preparation of the atomic attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One thing is that this American soldier was related to the worst bombing of the whole history humanity, gave the right to bring him to international criminal responsibility. But American citizens in terms of this kind of responsibility are completely inviolable. But the world awards cling to them, thanks to the amazing courtesy of the Scandinavian “distributors” of gratitude for peace. In general, Marshall - "peacemaker" with a capital letter ...
However, that we are all about Europeans and Americans. After all, the Nobel Committee donated peace awards to our compatriots, one of whom was Mikhail Gorbachev.

1990 year. Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, during which irreversible processes began on the territory of a huge country, which led to a colossal crisis. Where people of different nationalities lived in harmony with each other for decades, centers of interethnic tensions began to emerge, leading to a large fire that continues to burn in some regions of the former Soviet Union a couple of decades later. Mikhail Gorbachev is the laureate of the Peace Prize, who, through a series of political steps, has literally led half a world to a real humanitarian catastrophe that has touched tens of millions of people.

Year 2000. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded to the United Nations. Less than a year has passed since the NATO bombers, with the tacit consent of this organization, ironed the Serbian cities, leaving thousands of Serbian citizens homeless. At that time, the United Nations was renamed the Organization of Separated Nations and an accomplice of armed conflicts in the very center of Europe. But the United Nations, instead, as it should be in a progressive democratic environment, was awarded ... Not just awarded, but also the real Nobel Prize.

Year 2009. Noted as a winner and Barack Obama. Awarded the American President "For extraordinary efforts in strengthening international diplomacy and cooperation between nations." And the actions were really extraordinary ... Especially after Obama won the prize. Real chaos swept North Africa and the Middle East. The world has never in the new millennium stood so close to the abyss of global war. Apparently, the Nobel Peace Prize has become for the American president a kind of pass to the world where you can do whatever you want: from the bombing of peaceful cities to the destruction of foreign leaders under undoubted pacifist slogans.

If the creative work of the Nobel Committee is enough, then soon we can expect the presentation of a peace prize, for example, NATO. Why? On the "peacekeeping" operations of the North Atlantic Alliance, you can lay down odes ...

And, seriously, the very idea of ​​awarding peace after awarding the above-mentioned persons and structures has obviously outlived its usefulness and needs serious reform. After all, the modern approach to awarding more closely resembles backstage games, in which prizes are often distributed to those who are least worthy of them. Being on the same list with Mother Teresa of Barack Obama with the European Union is a mockery of the memory of Mother Teresa herself, and of the memory of all those people who actually entered the annals of history as fighters for peace and justice.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    23 November 2012 09: 01
    Well, the Nobel Committee has long been nothing more than a bunch of little people chopping loot on other people's money. And therefore no more than a sign. The most politicized to the same. Here it’s not only possible to cling to a world prize, to anyone. Distribute guided by not entirely clear what principles.
    1. sergskak
      +7
      23 November 2012 10: 19
      Quote: Banshee
      Distribute guided by not entirely clear what principles.
      Why is it not clear? Look at your surname. Well, Jews. And politics and pathos in the first place.
    2. +7
      23 November 2012 10: 26
      The presentation of the Nobel Prize, personally reminds me of the presentation of prizes in our pop music ..... The same people hang out and reward themselves ... And if specifically for the Peace Prize, then this is one of the elements of screwing in the brain, because officially the UN in 2000 and Obama in 2009 and the EU in 2012 and even Gorbach fought for peace ..... Because you can say with "extremely honest persons" that the bombing of Yugoslavia and Libya is only useful for their residents, it is also possible with "extremely honest people "present the Peace Prize for this .....
    3. Slayer
      +3
      23 November 2012 10: 29
      Just a business or anything personal)))
    4. Alx1miK
      0
      23 November 2012 13: 37
      Of course, Eurovision is the same - look who voted for whom. Not because of the good voices / songs and performances. But purely for political reasons. or geographical proximity, or some sort of economic relationship. All these contests / prizes are mouse fuss of those in power. Which is not worth it seriously. After all, the Buranovsky Grandmothers won - we know that.
  2. +13
    23 November 2012 09: 03
    I won’t be surprised if they give Hitler the next peace prize posthumously. Fars is not a peace prize. The prize is handed over for shed blood and warriors. It’s necessary to rename it not the Nobel Prize, but Lucifer, it will be more suitable today.
    1. +6
      23 November 2012 10: 03
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      I won’t be surprised. If they give the next Peace Prize to Hitler,


      If not for the Jews, they would certainly have handed
      1. 0
        23 November 2012 19: 32
        But the possessed "Pusek" will surely be nominated by someone for the prize. In the West, all Russophobes applaud them as heroes, which is what is required of the applicant!
    2. +1
      23 November 2012 10: 09
      And the next winner, I think, will be NATO?
      1. +1
        23 November 2012 10: 26
        Quote: Cap-3 of the USSR
        And the next winner, I think, will be NATO?


        So Volodin at the end of the article writes about this, probably Hillary is looking for a creative creature of a crazy type
        1. +5
          23 November 2012 11: 34
          I think there are many candidates now being considered: Hillary, Sarkozy, Netanyahu, "this one who is from the transitional government of Syria", Erdogan, etc. Probably they are still thinking of awarding prizes not to organizations, but to specific products: F 16, Tomogavk, V 52, a shell with uranium filling ... And what, quite peacekeeping products ...
          You can joke, and send Russia to Serdyukov for the nomination, because no one will argue that in peacekeeping he has succeeded greatly, significantly reducing the combat effectiveness of the Russian army. I think the Nobel Prize is provided to him !!!
          1. botur2013
            +1
            23 November 2012 16: 26
            Quote: Wertynskiy
            shell with uranium filling ... And what, quite a peacemaking product ...

            Only if sent to the award, then on their own.
          2. Horde
            +1
            23 November 2012 20: 39
            to send Serdyukov from Russia to the nomination, because no one will argue that in peacekeeping he succeeded greatly, significantly reducing the combat effectiveness of the Russian army. I think the Nobel Prize is provided to him !!!


            and Shnobelevka, and the Maltese cross ... sad
    3. mda
      mda
      0
      23 November 2012 15: 38
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      The prize is awarded for spilled blood and warriors

      Amendment-for blood shed by the West
    4. sergskak
      +2
      23 November 2012 18: 16
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      I won’t be surprised. If they give the next Peace Prize to Hitler, posthumously of course.
      Yes, to hell with him and Hitler, they threatened to give "puska" a prize. Like martyrs probably. For special merits their mother. And in fact they will.
  3. +5
    23 November 2012 09: 11
    as they say - you will not praise yourself - no one will praise ... (probably they were guided by this principle wassat ) But in general it even reached the point of absurdity ... Breivik would have been awarded the Peace Prize ...
  4. +8
    23 November 2012 09: 13
    By the way, in 1945 they wanted to present the Nobel Peace Prize to Stalin. Greedy, damn capitalists ...
    1. +10
      23 November 2012 10: 38
      Quote: Marinist

      By the way, in 1945 they wanted to present the Nobel Peace Prize to Stalin. Greedy, damn capitalists ...

      DIDN'T GRAVE, BUT DECREASED HIS ROLE IN HISTORY ...

  5. Xtra1l
    +8
    23 November 2012 09: 13
    It is true that Leo Tolstoy did not accept this award
    1. +9
      23 November 2012 10: 16
      Quote: Xtra1l
      It is true that Leo Tolstoy did not accept this award


      He managed to refuse before the Nobel Academy decided that Tolstoy’s contribution to culture was not only not worthy of the prize, but rather even harmful to it.

      Of course, any ram will write "War and Peace", but - here is Selma Legerlef's "Wonderful Journey of Niels with Wild Geese" this is a masterpiece (moreover, a collective one from different fairy tales, it is necessary to collect and attach everything) Swede Selma Prize for you
  6. +7
    23 November 2012 09: 51
    Explosions. Dynamite. Nobel Award. Peace.
    It seems an absurd set of words, but consonant with another series.
    Dissidents. Traitors. Tolerance. Gorbachev. Obama
    You can continue for a long time.
    The Peace Prize in its current form has outlived itself.
    1. mamba
      +1
      23 November 2012 10: 51
      Quote: omsbon
      Explosions. Dynamite. Nobel Award. Peace.

      Alfred Bernhardovich tried to leave a good memory about himself and thereby improve his karma, which was pretty much spoiled by the invention of dynamite - a weapon that killed so many people! But he overestimated the honesty of his compatriots. The poor fellow has to turn over in his grave from indignation every time, but nothing can be done. request
  7. InkGrey
    +1
    23 November 2012 10: 26
    Yes, the Nobel Committee does not show itself from the best side not only in the peace prize. In literature, for example, don't get it either. And "Mira" is another tool for attracting "plus signs from the masses". So that the people watched and inspired. Serious people do not regard this award as an achievement.
  8. +17
    23 November 2012 10: 33
    HUNCHED UNDER COURT ...! ! !

    1. +2
      23 November 2012 13: 25
      Quote: GRIGORIY1957

      HUNCHED UNDER COURT ...! !

      In our country they don’t judge such people, in our country they give out such medals.
      1. 0
        23 November 2012 13: 45
        Don't downplay, colleague! Not medals but the HIGHEST AWARDS OF RUSSIA. It’s a pity the Hero wasn’t appropriated. Although it’s not yet evening.
  9. +2
    23 November 2012 10: 38
    Quote: GRIGORIY1957
    HUNCHED UNDER COURT ...


    Why is this? And so everyone understands, first on an aspen, then a stake from the same material
  10. anchonsha
    +1
    23 November 2012 10: 58
    Some of the selected Nobel laureates are still surprised. China created its Nobel Peace because it realized that the Swedish Nobel Peace is for its own - like, who orders music, he dances the girl. When were Europeans sincere? Only when they felt bad from their own brothers and they were repeatedly rescued by a Russian soldier. Well, how can Nobel give money to some Russian rock when the EU is in economic collapse ...
  11. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    +1
    23 November 2012 11: 00
    This is rather the Shnobel Prize, not the Nobel .... what Judging by what kind of personalities they give.
  12. +1
    23 November 2012 11: 06
    That's right, they use money for dynamite, and use it for dynamite. And then where does the money come from, if no one will fight.
  13. +3
    23 November 2012 11: 22
    The farther into the forest the meaner the partisans. Watching the last years of the ceremony and the Nobel Prize winners themselves - it becomes dreary. There are very few really high-profile discoveries in the world of science and medicine, all the other nominees of the devil will understand who, and most importantly, why get this award? Immediately comes the analogy with the Shnobel Prize, where one Japanese was awarded it for research in the field, attention: Necrophilic homosexuality in wild drakes. In how. The world is blazing with the glow of wars, and they are giving prizes for the cause of peace to those who are guilty of these wars. Paranoia in a word.
  14. +2
    23 November 2012 11: 27
    With the Nobel Prize, everything is clear. The only question is, why do these organizations, so to speak, still enjoy some kind of reverence at the official level? On TV they talk about them almost aspirated? The European Union, the European Parliament, the IMF, the OSCE, the Nobel Committee, various human rights organizations, awards, nominations ... Is it really not clear that these are all links in the same chain? On the part of Russia, these "organizations" should be completely ignored ... Nothing good can come from THERE, except for another spit in the face not even of our country, but of all MANKIND.
  15. IlyaKuv
    +2
    23 November 2012 11: 58
    It is not enough that they have spat on our history so they have reshaped their own way. In a short time, Adolf Hitler will be awarded the Peace Prize posthumously for “positive undertakings in the countries of Eastern Europe.” Bourgeois psychopaths have obvious schizophrenia, and the second personality, evil, is hiding behind a mask the first visible democracy.
  16. Edya
    +2
    23 November 2012 12: 09
    Ani there bl .... Th completely. When the European Union decided to give the Nobel, it was necessary to give drunken saddles to those who deserved to have achieved something innovative and not a handful of fat old people who, with their democracies ...
    1. mda
      mda
      0
      23 November 2012 15: 46
      Quote: Eddy
      Ani there bl .... Th completely. When the European Union decided to give the Nobel, it was necessary to give drunken saddles to those who deserved to have achieved something innovative and not a handful of fat old people who, with their democracies ...

      No, they just lick one place in the West
  17. +6
    23 November 2012 12: 37
    In 1946, Irgun members staged an explosion at British headquarters at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which killed 91 people. Two years later, the group launched an attack on the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin, where about 200 Arabs were killed. Begin claimed that in both cases warnings were made about the attack. The British authorities called him "terrorist number 1". Later, in an interview to the remark that Begin, like Arafat, a terrorist, he replied: “Yes, I'm a terrorist. But he is a bandit! ”
    http://www.jjew.ru/index.php?cnt=8964
    (Jewish Journal. Article by Menachem Begin, “Terrorist No. 1”)

    ... the seventh Prime Minister of Israel from June 1977 to 1983, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate (1978) In the 1940s, the head of the Jewish underground organization Irgun .... Wiki
    Here is another example.
  18. +4
    23 November 2012 12: 49
    All institutions in Europe - whether it be the Nobel Prize, the Gaga tribunal or the European Court of Human Rights have long been guided by political considerations and not by law and morality.
  19. +3
    23 November 2012 13: 03
    We Russians have the legal right to judge the dignity of the Nobel laureates also because we do not forget: in every Nobel Prize, that part of the capital that Alfred Nobel received not only for the explosions of his dynamite, but also for the theft of the oil wealth of our Motherland.
  20. +1
    23 November 2012 13: 22
    Their prize, their choice of candidates and laureates, they can’t pay and elevate the one who is more convenient and better from our point of view, and if this happens, we must carefully consider the situation
  21. +1
    23 November 2012 13: 50
    The conclusion suggests itself. A decent person will not be given the Nobel Peace Prize.
  22. Mr.Fox
    +2
    23 November 2012 14: 33
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    I won’t be surprised. If they give the next peace prize to Hitler, posthumously of course


    Hitler just received his prize. Not the Nobel, but almost. In 1938, shortly before the invasion of Poland, Time magazine named Hitler "man of the year" in a January XNUMX issue.
  23. +1
    23 November 2012 15: 39
    Okay, Nobel dudes. And this is Medvedev D.A. also informed the hero of the day about the decree signed today on awarding M. Gorbachev with the highest award of Russia - the Order of the Holy Apostle Andrew the First-Called. "I believe that this is an adequate assessment of the great work that you carried out as head of state. You really led our country in a very difficult, very dramatic period. And we all remember this, at least those who were already more - less adults. This is a big work. It can be evaluated in different ways, and you know this very well. But it is really a big and difficult work. And secondly. I see in this a symbol of respect for the state that you headed, for that state, which was our common homeland - to the Soviet Union ", - said the President of Russia.

    Read full article: http://top.rbc.ru/society/02/03/2011/552777.shtml

    When I watched on TV, it was clear that this one with a stain was ofigel
    1. +1
      23 November 2012 17: 42
      No wonder. GDP persistently made DAM an eccentric. Moreover, it was not difficult - remember the squeals from a free iPhone in the White House. Well, comments about Serdyukov’s use for army reform and the Order of Gorbatom are like that, a control shot. In the ass.
  24. +4
    23 November 2012 16: 39
    When the Nobel Prize was shared by the chocolate president, I realized that this whole organization is a circus and nothing more.
  25. Brother Sarych
    -3
    23 November 2012 16: 44
    Come on, the only odd nomination on the list is Obama, because the prize was awarded in advance, all the others were awarded for obvious reasons! Maybe we don’t like these reasons, but we don’t hand the prize - set up your own prize and give it to anyone you want!
  26. Gorchakov
    0
    23 November 2012 20: 55
    The Nobel Prize, this is a globalist prize ... We need to somehow somehow officially conduct grants all over the world .... Suppose, how could Gorbachev get money to sell his homeland and advance NATO to the borders of Russia, so that he would not be shot for it ? How to give money as a bribe to Obama, who has just taken office, for actively promoting democracy to the east? And with the European Union, these rich Jews were clearly cheaper ... In short, the Nobel Peace Prize nomination is just the reckoning of the British club with its agents ...
  27. +2
    23 November 2012 23: 41
    Peacemaker .......... your mother! The country is waging two wars, and its president is awarded a peace prize! I’m laughing nemagu !!
  28. georg737577
    +2
    24 November 2012 03: 33
    The prize this year was to receive Gaddafi. Peace be upon you, Colonel ...
  29. Dimon simfer
    0
    24 November 2012 13: 23
    Quote: mamba
    Alfred Bernhardovich tried to leave a good memory about himself and thereby improve his karma, which was pretty much spoiled by the invention of dynamite - a weapon that killed so many people!
    .
    Western standards, as always, are two-faced. Premium money in the blood.
    The Americans are not far behind. Since their founding, all their crap and statehood has been abundantly watered with the blood of the indigenous population of North America.