The Balkan Pact on the Eve of Stalin's Death

24
The Balkan Pact on the Eve of Stalin's Death

The end of the Stalin era turned out to be truly terrible - with a stampede and numerous victims on the days of farewell, as if at the coronation of the last emperor long before that. The funeral of the leader, who officially passed away on March 5, 1953, was, as you know, scheduled for Monday, March 9.

Delegations from the Soviet regions and far abroad, who hastily arrived in Moscow, asked to postpone Stalin's funeral at least a day, and preferably two days later. In order not to rush to say goodbye to the long-term leader of the Leninist Party and the Soviet Union. However, the "comrades-in-arms" and "disciples" were adamant: March 9, period.




But many foreign delegations were able to arrive in the capital of the USSR only on 10 and even 12-13 March. Well, their wreaths to the mausoleum almost immediately ended up in the Moscow River, in the Yauza and Setun. Where, according to contemporaries, due to an overabundance of flowers and wreaths, real "plugs" were formed that impeded the flow of these rivers...

The forgotten prophecy of the "iron" chancellor


On the other hand, in the Balkans and in Turkey, it seems, they were preparing in advance and well “prepared” for the end of the Stalin era, including politically. In this regard, it is impossible not to recall two predictions at once, or rather, real prophecies.

The legendary Chancellor of Germany, aptly nicknamed the "iron" Otto von Bismarck, had no doubt that

"The spark for a new war will be some damned stupidity in the Balkans."

The great helmsman Mao Zedong 80 years later, in 1969, directly repeated Bismarck's prediction:

"A new world war, if it starts, then first in the Balkans."

Between these forecasts, the truly tragic year 1953 fit. In Turkish Ankara on February 28, 1953 - literally on the eve of Stalin's death - the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between Turkey, Greece and Yugoslavia was signed. This treaty had an article (at number 6) on consultations on issues of joint defense, if any participating country would be threatened by a military invasion from outside.

This treaty soon became known as the military-political Balkan Pact. Which is quite objective, since Turkey and Greece have become NATO members since 1952, and Yugoslavia in 1951 concluded an open-ended Security Treaty with the United States. He drew the FPRY into the military orbit of the United States and NATO as a whole.

Thus, Yugoslavia "comprehensively" insured against the invasion of the troops of the USSR and its Eastern European allies: Soviet-Yugoslav relations in 1948-1953, we recall, were on the verge of a military conflict. It is noteworthy that some media in Greece and Turkey, on the eve of the Balkan Pact and in the first week after, drew attention to the absence of Stalin in public politics.

predict not guess


In Ankara and Athens, as it turned out, they rightly believed that a change in the leadership of the USSR could soon take place in Moscow. This is exactly what happened a week later, although the emigrant Radio Liberation, created by the US CIA (since 1959, Radio Liberty), we note, already on March 1, 1953 - in its first broadcast to the USSR - reported that Stalin was either dying or already deceased.

In the USSR, this message was not refuted - how, alas, this is typical of our propaganda. And the actual inclusion of Yugoslavia into the NATO system, which took place just in those days, showed that Moscow frankly went too far in the confrontation with Belgrade. Therefore, the Soviet side did not comment on the creation of the Balkan Pact.

Soviet intelligence, on the other hand, had facts about the periodic transfer in 1949-1953 of OUN members and emissaries of Western intelligence both to the USSR and back. On a variety of routes: through Yugoslav Slovenia, Croatia, Vojvodina to Hungary and Czechoslovakia.


However, according to the Yugoslav expert Mirko Drazic, in the late 1940s - early 1950s. Moscow simply did not risk "excessive pressure" on Warsaw, Prague and Budapest in matters of joint struggle against nationalists in the Baltic States and Western Ukraine. The Soviet leadership feared that Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary would “switch over” to the side of the “Tito clique”.

Stalin's last gift


At the same time, the USSR in the period from 1947 to 1951 supported, and quite actively, Belgrade's demand for the annexation of the Italian islands of Bishevo, Svetac, Palagruzha and Yabuka, located in the central Adriatic, to Yugoslavia.

As a result, at the beginning of 1951, they were included in the FPRY. But even this circumstance did not “turn away” Belgrade from signing the Balkan Pact. In a word, the very fact of signing this Pact on the eve of Stalin's death can be considered highly indicative.

He testifies that in Yugoslavia, and in the West, too, it was not without reason that they expected that the struggle for power in the Soviet leadership after Stalin would weaken the foreign policy of the USSR. Therefore, it is necessary to take advantage of this in advance and, accordingly, include the FPRY in the NATO orbit.

The duration of the Pact was 20 years. But official statements of the participating countries on the termination of its action did not follow. That is, since the mid-70s, it has become a kind of "reserve" bloc for Yugoslavia in case Soviet-Yugoslav relations escalate again.

Did the marshal know?


... Josip Broz Tito learned about the death of Stalin on the Galeb, a ship of the Yugoslav Navy, on which the FPRY delegation was heading to Great Britain. The Marshal's head of security, Colonel S. Zhezhel, came to Tito shouting:

"Comrade Marshal, Stalin is dead!"


Zhezhel handed Tito a telegram dated March 6 from the FPRYU embassy. Tito read it, then said:

"Yeah, I always knew he wouldn't die a natural death."

From Marshal Tito came an unequivocal instruction: to limit the expression of condolences only verbally and only on behalf of the government of Yugoslavia. It was also decided that Yugoslavia's charge d'affaires in the USSR, I. Djuric, would take part in the funeral ceremony.

And here, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR Yakov Malik defiantly extended his hand to Dzhurich. He considered the handshake so important that on the same day he sent a dispatch to Belgrade. It noted, among other things:

“... It seemed that Stalin began to interfere as soon as he died, so he was quickly buried ...”

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    5 March 2023 05: 02
    The Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between Turkey, Greece and Yugoslavia was signed

    For some reason, I immediately remembered the fable about the swan, cancer and pike.
    Probably, the same thought in the Soviet Foreign Ministry ... wink
  2. +17
    5 March 2023 05: 04
    I will say more, even now, after so much time after his death, he interferes with many. Like a bone in the throat ... At the mere mention of it among the five-columns, liberda and all other shushara thieves, traitors and just rear-wheel drive five-hundredth mortgage holders, it starts to burn very well
    1. +17
      5 March 2023 07: 12
      even now, after so much time after his death, he interferes with many. Like a bone in my throat
      There is such a thing
      They themselves cannot boast of anything like that, so they are angry ..
      1. +7
        5 March 2023 18: 02
        Quote: not the one
        They themselves cannot boast of anything like that, so they are angry ..

        So after all, the only way for pygmies to become on a par with titanium is to slander him, and praise himself.
        1. 0
          19 May 2023 17: 20
          Quote: Aleksandre
          So after all, the only way for pygmies to become on a par with titanium is to slander him, and praise himself.

          Under Stalin, the pygmy from the NKVD Khvat destroyed with impunity the scientific materials of Vavilov's travels, on which the USSR spent huge amounts of money. Pygmies from the NKVD, with the approval of Stalin, slandered and imprisoned and partially killed all the outstanding aircraft designers and the developer of jet weapons. So the Stalinists are better at lying. Moreover, their lies are more dangerous and harmful. The most interesting thing is that the leadership of the MGB and Stalin himself, since about 1947, were agents of influence of the head of the CIA's special operations department, Dulles, and it was with their hands that Dulles destroyed politicians objectionable to the Americans in Eastern and Central Europe during his well-known operation "Disintegrating factor". The de-Stalinization and exposure of the personality cult of Stalin is an attempt by the Soviet leadership to minimize the damage caused by Dulles and his agents, which he received by slipping his spy into Polish and Soviet counterintelligence agents in Poland.
    2. +6
      5 March 2023 11: 19
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      At the mere mention of it among the five-columns, liberda and all other shushara thieves, traitors and just rear-wheel drive five-hundredth mortgage holders, it starts to burn very well

      Even "do not burn", but they all smell the noose around their neck, only at the mention of Stalin's name. The fifth column is like a multi-headed hydra that breeds like rabbits and must be destroyed without "breaks for lunch". This is what they are afraid of.
      Before the Second World War, Stalin almost destroyed the 5th column, but something remained and calmed down, but after 7 years by 1952, it surfaced. Under Brezhnev, they tried to squeeze, but not exterminate, Andropov tried and left like Stalin. Sika deer "himself from this column created an entire army that ruined the country and now it is no longer just a "fifth column", but a column alternative to the country's authorities. And if it is not destroyed, it will destroy the state, which we see in the example of Europe and former republics of the USSR.
  3. +6
    5 March 2023 05: 16
    A set of feces, not an article. Yesterday there was an excellent article by Podymov about the architecture of Moscow, and today the usual "podymovshchina" with twitchy quotes and "far-fetched" conclusions. It's disgusting and disgusting to read this.
  4. +5
    5 March 2023 05: 32
    In my youth, I read the book by Orest Maltsev "The Yugoslav Tragedy" (1951), a thing completely and definitely purposeful, but for those who are interested in "Balkan cuisine" I advise you to read it.
    By a decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Orest Mikhailovich Maltsev was awarded the Stalin Prize of the second degree for 1951 for the novel "The Yugoslav Tragedy".

    Opinions about the book are very controversial, but ... judge for yourself after reading it.
    1. +2
      5 March 2023 10: 14
      Thanks for the CU, you don’t always find something interesting on your own hi
  5. +3
    5 March 2023 05: 50
    The article is not about the Balkan Pact, but is dedicated to the anniversary of Stalin's death.
    And the key phrase:
    "Yeah, I always knew he wouldn't die a natural death."
    Vanguete?!
    1. +3
      5 March 2023 09: 20
      The article is not about the Balkan Pact
      By and large, yes. The topic of the Balkan Pact has not been disclosed, from the word at all.
  6. +8
    5 March 2023 06: 21
    And the article seemed to me similar to the articles of AIDS info from the 90s, or modern Ren-TV programs. A few phrases-magnets (prophecy, not by his death, wreaths in the river), lack of evidence and logic of the story.
  7. +9
    5 March 2023 06: 38
    Look what will happen today, a sea of ​​flowers on Red Square, and those who danced in front of him during his lifetime, and then "emboldened" are abandoned and forgotten.
  8. +6
    5 March 2023 07: 15
    In Turkish Ankara on February 28, 1953 - literally on the eve of Stalin's death - the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between Turkey, Greece and Yugoslavia was signed. This treaty had an article (at number 6) on consultations on issues of joint defense if any participating country would be threatened by a military invasion from outside.
    This treaty soon became known as the military-political Balkan Pact. Which is quite objective, since Turkey and Greece have become NATO members since 1952, and Yugoslavia in 1951 concluded an open-ended Security Treaty with the United States. He drew the FPRY into the military orbit of the United States and NATO as a whole.

    After that, less than fifty years later, humanitarian bombardments of Yugoslavia began at the suggestion of godlike Americans. Using the example of Yugoslavia, the Americans showed that they do not care about the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of force without the decision of the UN Security Council, unless it is used in self-defense. On the other hand, Yugoslavia is a classic example of a country willing to voluntarily lie under the Americans. On this occasion, A.E. Edrikhin (writer's pseudonym Vandam), Major General (1917), military intelligence officer, White Guard, White émigré wrote back in 1913:
    It is bad to have the Anglo-Saxon as an enemy, but God forbid to have him as a friend!
  9. +1
    5 March 2023 07: 18
    What kind of nonsense is this? And some kind of kurguza. It seems that this "collective" itself was afraid of what he wrote ...
  10. +7
    5 March 2023 07: 27
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    I will say more, even now, after so much time after his death, he interferes with many. Like a bone in the throat ... At the mere mention of it among the five-columns, liberda and all other shushara thieves, traitors and just rear-wheel drive five-hundredth mortgage holders, it starts to burn very well
    if Stalin's death was a murder, and Khrushchevshchina immediately began its dirty deeds of demonizing Stalin, then you involuntarily ask yourself the question - did Stalin put a little little against the wall, or put a little of the wrong ones .. Here's the question - a little little, or a little of the wrong ones? ... And today's liberals and all sorts of other 3,14 derasts should also be tormented by the same question, because those times will not last forever when there will not be that person who will correct Stalin's shortcomings and mistakes ...
    1. -1
      6 March 2023 21: 12
      At least, within the framework of the "Leningrad case" it is clearly not those. So that not very smart Mukhin and Prudnikova do not write there.
  11. +4
    5 March 2023 07: 58
    The Balkan Pact included Yugoslavia in the Western defense system, which strengthened the country's security. On the other hand, it also created problems for Tito and the Union of Communists of Yugoslavia and brought the FPRJ and Greece closer together. The Balkan Pact indirectly aggravated international and ideological conflicts. Then, during the initiatives of Yugoslavia with the Soviet Union in 1954 and 1955, they led to a change in the views of the FPRY on the military significance of the Balkan Pact.
  12. -1
    5 March 2023 08: 34
    This article is only a mild scratch on the surface.

    For this forum, material like this military museums catalog will give you a look to the real history, and true events in the balkans.

    https://issuu.com/parkvojaskezgodovine/docs/armor_of_freedom_exhibition_catalog

    P.S.
  13. +9
    5 March 2023 10: 30
    The article is called "The Balkan Pact on the Eve of Stalin's Death", but there is nothing really about the Balkan Pact, nor about Stalin's death, nor about what connection the authors saw between these events. Typically, articles of this kind are classified as "outline".
  14. +5
    5 March 2023 10: 51
    The end of the Stalin era turned out to be truly terrible - with a crush and numerous victims on the days of farewell
    All this is noble (Don Sera), but there is still no data on "numerous victims" during Stalin's funeral. I understand that when the cases of the “innocently repressed” are kept secret, this can be explained - those victims were not “innocent”, but the data on those killed during the stampede is a sure fact of the “horrors of totalitarianism”, why is there no data here? Strange.
  15. +6
    5 March 2023 11: 09
    Yugoslavia is paying for its then policy as for the sins of Judas. And not everything has passed along this path.
    And Stalin, surprisingly, is becoming more and more great, the further, the more, although he has been gone for 70 years.
    Lenin, after his 70 years, began to massively fall from the pedestals, and Stalin begins to rise on them again.
  16. 0
    13 March 2023 18: 28
    Quote from: FoBoss_VM
    starts to burn very well

    Moreover, there is an anomalous similarity in relation to Stalin, even among ideological opponents.

    In mutual hatred for the Great Stalin, ethnic liberals and Unisosses intertwined.

    Both of them are crippled due to the fact that over the years that have passed since the collapse of the USSR, neither ethnic liberals nor the United Sos have been able to achieve for the Russian Federation even comparable to the RSFSR, not to mention the USSR, GDP.

    Population growth, GDP growth, lower prices for basic products (meat!).
    It's all about Stalinism.

    Raising the retirement age (Viva France, greetings to Macron), population decline, replacement of the indigenous population by newcomers without Russian citizenship, etc. "charms" - the achievement of ethnic liberals, abundantly represented in all power structures.

    But Russia is being cleansed of this foam.
    The shameful, carefully hushed up flight from Russia, with the beginning of the SVO of several Vice-premiers, is an important marker.
    On the Old Square, the ideologists of modern Russia hiccupped for a long time, having learned about the mass exodus over the hill of officials of all classes, secret carriers and budget-suckers.

    This helped to draw far-reaching conclusions about who surrounds the Leader of the Nation.

    Next to him, only devoted comrades-in-arms remained, for whom the path to the West was ordered.
    1. 0
      19 May 2023 17: 31
      Quote: Comrade Kim
      over the years that have passed since the collapse of the USSR, neither ethnic liberals nor the United Sos have been able to achieve for the Russian Federation even comparable to the RSFSR, not to mention the USSR,

      If we compare the SVO in Ukraine with the invasion of Afghanistan under Stalin or the Finnish war, then Putin and Gerasimov are better at it. Even if we compare the first year and a half of the NWO and the first year and a half of the Great Patriotic War, the comparison is in favor of Putin and not Stalin.