The West, which was the main enemy of Christianity at its dawn, later decided to monopolize it

36
The West, which was the main enemy of Christianity at its dawn, later decided to monopolize it

Christianity, which originated in the East and was the lot of the dispossessed, eventually decided to seize the hands of those in power in the West, making it a vehicle for their political goals.

Let us remember that Christianity originated on the territory of the Roman Empire at the beginning of our era in an era when Rome was still a powerful state. In those years, the West, represented by the Roman Empire, was very similar in its morals to modern advanced Western countries in terms of the absence of any kind of moral and ethical principles and complete licentiousness.



The empire was ruled by Roman emperors and their officials, who, like the vast majority of the empire's subjects, were pagans. In such a situation, in one of the distant Roman provinces in the East, a man appears in Judea, whose sermons were hated by both the local Jewish authorities and the central authorities in Rome. As you know, the Romans eventually decided to crucify Jesus. This is how the West, represented by Rome, reacted to the founder of the Christian religion.

Despite pressure from the authorities, followers of Christianity began to spread in various areas of the empire, including Rome itself. For many years they had to practice their religion secretly, fearing for their lives. It was especially difficult for Christians under Emperor Nero, who blamed all his problems on representatives of a new religion for Rome.

However, over time, the Roman authorities began to understand that Christianity could be used for their own benefit - not to persecute, but to lead. But the establishment of Christianity as a state religion occurred primarily in the east of the Roman Empire. At the beginning of the XNUMXth century, the empire's neighbor Armenia became the first country to adopt Christianity as a state religion. And with the establishment of Emperor Constantine on the Roman throne, Christianity actually turned into the state religion of the Roman Empire. It should be noted that the capital of the empire was already located in the east of the country in Constantinople, and it was there that Christianity began to freely establish itself. But how did it happen that Rome, which hated Christians, suddenly turned into the main Christian city, in the person of which the West at one time decided to monopolize Christianity? Rome, which ruled countries and peoples for hundreds of years, seemed to change its appearance in order to rule the world for hundreds more years.

If you try to figure it out stories question, there is nothing concrete indicating that the Roman high priests should be the main ones among Christians. At the same time, various legends are cited that supposedly they originate from the Apostle Peter, etc. Although all the luxury in which the “vicars of God on Earth” blissed and continue to bliss in Rome (and today in the Vatican) is very far from the lifestyle of the apostles, not to mention Jesus himself.

At the end of the XNUMXth century, the Roman Empire split into Western and Eastern, and even then little was known about the “Popes,” much less that Rome was the stronghold of Christianity.

In the Middle Ages, in some miraculous way (we must give them their due), the Roman high priests were able to impose on all of Western Europe the idea that they were God’s representatives on earth and that everyone, including rulers, should obey them. Rome decided that they should dictate to the whole world what Christianity should be like. Many rulers of Europe then feared the wrath of the Pope. The new masters of the former Roman Empire quickly realized how Christianity could be used to their advantage. In 1054, Christianity officially split into Catholic and Orthodox. After which the Popes only began to feel more strongly that they were special, “chosen” (it is not clear by whom) Christians. The same thought does not leave the owners of the so-called bright city on the hill today.

As a result, Rome, from where orders came for reprisals against Christians in ancient times, received a monopoly on Christianity, or rather on the management of hundreds of millions of Christians. The Christian religion has become a tool for the occupation of territories, the establishment of puppet regimes, predatory wars, and crusades of Western rulers. For hundreds of years, the West destroyed people and plundered their countries in Africa, America, Asia, and Australia. Tens of millions of indigenous people in the Americas and Australia have become victims of the “humanity” of the West. And in 1099, during the first Crusade, called for by Pope Urban II, thousands of people were slaughtered in Jerusalem, sacred to all monotheistic religions.

If in previous times all this was done under the guise of high Christian ideas and values, today the West continues to do the same thing, only exposing all its vile deeds in beautiful words like “democracy”, “protection of human rights”, etc. And like Rome in the era of the Roman Empire, and like Western Europe in the Middle Ages (with the strong influence of the Popes) and in modern times (the time of colonialism), the West continues to believe that it is the center of the world and everyone should be equal to it, and those who do not want to will be forced.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    7 September 2023 11: 15
    ""In the Middle Ages, in some miraculous way (we must give them their due), the Roman high priests were able to impose on all of Western Europe the idea that they were God's representatives on earth and that everyone, including rulers, should obey them. ""
    A person apparently knows about history from movies or wikis and, for example, knows nothing about Charlemagne.
    1. -3
      7 September 2023 12: 33
      The Pontifex is AT THE SAME TIME both spiritual and secular (Vatican) Lord.
      (This is how the deputy head of the enterprise is SIMULTANEOUSLY the head of the trade union committee of this enterprise).
      What is the antithesis of Christianity. In fact, Catholicism TODAY has become the religion of the Antichrist.
      SHLOMO, HAVE YOU READ THE BIBLE? — NO, WE DID NOT READ THE BIBLE... WE WRITTEN IT...
      The Old Testament is 100% Jewish.
      The difference between today's Catholics and Orthodox is the same as between Muslims and Islamists.
      1. +2
        7 September 2023 13: 22
        Quote: knn54
        The deputy head of the enterprise is AT THE SAME TIME the head of the trade union committee of this enterprise

        And it happens in modern times. No surprise...
      2. +2
        8 September 2023 01: 18
        Well, since we are talking about Shlomo, and about the 100% Jewish Old Testament, how do you like this news?

        An agreement between the Russian Federation and Israel on cooperation in the field of film production was signed on Wednesday by Russian Minister of Culture Olga Lyubimova and Israeli Ambassador Alexander Ben Zvi.

        What she happily hastened to share with all of us on her official T-channel.

        Just now, together with the Ambassador Plenipotentiary of Israel to Russia, Mr. Alexander Ben Zvi, we signed a long-awaited intergovernmental agreement between our countries on cooperation in the field of joint film production.



        I wonder what in this area the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation is going to promote jointly with Israel?

        We all remember her thanks to her T-shirt with an epic obscene inscription ... Well, and the generous distribution of state grants for shooting all sorts of dubious films and more than dubious theatrical productions.

        So you don’t know what the history of modern Russia will result in with such historiographers. At least in the field of culture.
    2. +5
      8 September 2023 12: 38
      An article full of deceit. ANY religion strives to maximize the number of its flock. Russia, too, since the time of Alexei Mikhailovich, wanted to become the Third Rome, but it didn’t work out. The intestine turned out to be thin. And this merging of power and the Church is a universal rule. Remember how cruel the most holy Equal-to-the-Apostles Princess Olga was, how much blood was shed by Saint Prince Vladimir, and even later - during the time of Patriarch Nikon, how many lives his reform claimed... By the way, the Orthodox Church abroad repented to the Old Believers for the atrocities committed by Nikon and his minions, and The Russian Orthodox Church never did this. Let’s remember the forced Christianization of the Volga region, let’s remember how the “meek” rulers baptized Rus' - and everything will be clear about who needs religion and what it really is. And now religion is separated from the state in Russia only formally, and now God has settled in the Constitution. I don’t think that the president and the prime minister, who fervently pray in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior on all holidays, really believe in God: both have departments of scientific atheism in Soviet universities behind them. Should we blame Catholics if they themselves have crooked faces? My father still remembers his great-grandmother, who lived under serfdom. How were religion and slavery combined? And it combined perfectly: just like among Protestants in the USA, it coexisted with slavery. The history of the last three centuries in Russia is the history of riots: Razin, Pugachev, Bolotnikov, etc. And in these riots, some believers - the rebels - enthusiastically gutted the landowners and their servants, while other believers - the nobles and the army - hanged and flogged the rebels. Christian kindness did not extend to slaves. The landowner Saltykova, responsible for the death of dozens of serfs, simply fell under the hot hand of Catherine, but, according to contemporaries, there were a great many such “Saltykhs”. Here's a gentle sermon for you. It is interesting that in Russia the death penalty for renouncing Christianity and converting to another faith was abolished de jure only at the beginning of the 20th century. This shows how strong the religious bond was.
      What now? And now, on the territory of the university where I studied, there is a church built with government money. And the main military temple of the country was also built on donations alone. So there is no need to blame the Catholics: they should deal with their cockroaches.
  2. 0
    7 September 2023 11: 19
    The West, which was the main enemy of Christianity at its dawn, later decided to monopolize it

    ***
    “Then if anyone tells you: ‘Here is Christ or there,’ do not believe it.” ...
    (Math 24: 23)
    ***
  3. +10
    7 September 2023 11: 24
    The protégé of Rome, Pilate, did not find fault with Jesus. Therefore, to assert (as in the article) that the Romans crucified Christ is not entirely true. Pilate could have prevented the execution, but succumbed to the pressure of the Jews.
    1. 0
      7 September 2023 12: 23
      Well, yes, as always, the Jews are to blame.
      Not a ram governor, not a moronic vertical of the Romans.
      For the Romans who changed their shoes and decided to lead Christianity, this is convenient.
      For the "west", which is like the heritage and the flesh of the flesh of Rome, too.

      But for the Russian Federation, it’s time to admit the truth, that it is the Romans who are the bastards.
      1. +2
        7 September 2023 12: 39
        Quote: pettabyte
        Well, yes, as always, the Jews are to blame.

        And why write through the letter Y?
        Ozhegov's explanatory dictionary - zh.id (also, eternal zh.id), like eternal wanderers.
        Sergei Ivanovich Ozhegov - Doctor of Philology, a Soviet professor, was of noble origin, this was not some kind of anti-Semitic barefoot, a serious person.
        1. 0
          10 September 2023 19: 08
          Quote: bober1982
          And why write through the letter Y?
          Ozhegov's explanatory dictionary - zh.id (also, eternal zh.id)

          They made me laugh. How did you write it yourself? Through the point! Censorship is like a mirror that is harmful to kick))) no Ozhegov is its authority.
      2. +5
        7 September 2023 14: 16
        Quote: pettabyte
        for the Russian Federation, it’s time to admit the truth that it is the Romans who are the bastards.

        Yes, yes, and then talk about the Third Rome. That will be the most.
    2. +4
      7 September 2023 13: 24
      Quote: Blacksmith 55
      Pilate could have prevented the execution

      Pilate reasoned politically. He definitely did not need new unrest among the Jews, the time was already turbulent, and he had little strength.
    3. 0
      8 September 2023 10: 09
      Pilate could have prevented the execution, but succumbed to the pressure of the Jews.

      Excuse me, in what way? Send the existing regulations to hell and get another war? For what? At that time, the mentioned one was one of, in general, numerous... well, let it be, prophets. John the Baptist is the same...
  4. +6
    7 September 2023 11: 27
    The Jews crucified, not the Romans, you can not read further.
    1. +4
      7 September 2023 11: 41
      I agree with you, the author, judging by his last name, is a Muslim who knows nothing about Christianity and especially about its History. Well, it’s forgivable for a Muslim, but you don’t need to write about something you don’t know, you’ll look stupid.
      1. +1
        7 September 2023 12: 06
        In this case, the first name is more important than the last name. Some representative of the Khoisan peoples with an almost unpronounceable and unrecordable Cyrillic surname, consisting of clicking sounds, can also be baptized, but then he will have a Christian name in baptism.
    2. +2
      7 September 2023 12: 18
      The Romans crucified, but by the verdict of the Jews.
  5. +5
    7 September 2023 11: 34
    As you know, the Romans eventually decided to crucify Jesus
    Well, for the sake of truth, it was not the Romans who decided, but the Jews themselves, in the person of their elders, who demanded the crucifixion of Christ
    1. +2
      7 September 2023 11: 38
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      but the Jews themselves, in the person of their elders, who demanded to crucify Christ

      There, the Jewish people shouted ......... crucify Him
    2. +2
      8 September 2023 13: 05
      What exactly do you not like? In Russia, execution for religious beliefs has been quite common at all times; the most famous example is Archpriest Avvakum, who was burned in a log house in 1682 in Pustozersk, having previously been tortured for more than 14 years. And they burned not just one, but his comrades. And then there were thousands executed. So Christ was not the first and not the last.
  6. +7
    7 September 2023 11: 58
    complete nonsense, let's divide the Neanderthals into Western and correct
    1. +7
      7 September 2023 12: 02
      The correct ones are called Denisovans :-)
    2. -2
      7 September 2023 13: 38
      Ryaruav, listen to the sermons of the priests of the CPU and Uniates and tell us what is “Christian” about them
      “You can recognize them by their fruits. For you do not gather grapes from thorns, nor figs from thistles.”
      Matthew 7:16"
  7. +5
    7 September 2023 12: 11
    Having read up to the place where "man appears", I would like to respectfully ask the author not to talk more about Christian orthodoxy. Well, or at least get acquainted with the Creed first.
  8. +1
    7 September 2023 12: 17
    The West is now becoming more and more atheistic: where there is education, there is no place for prejudice. If somewhere there is an increased religiosity, then there is usually either a problem with the education of the population, or with the state, which implants superstitions to strengthen its power.
    1. +2
      7 September 2023 12: 21
      Atheism is when you don't believe in God. And when you sincerely believe that there is no God, and plant your faith in a way that is close to violent, or even just violent, this is no longer atheism.
      1. +4
        7 September 2023 13: 05
        it is no longer atheism.
        And theomachy, also a religion, but the same pears, only sideways.
  9. +7
    7 September 2023 12: 18
    Rare bullshit. The Romans decided to crucify Jesus??? fool The author is so "in the know" that any Sunday school student knows more about Christianity than the author.
    We must pay tribute to the reckless courage of the author to write about subjects in which not an ounce ... In general, the Dunning-Kruger effect in all its glory. negative
  10. +4
    7 September 2023 12: 22
    The West continues to believe that it is the center of the world and everyone should be equal to it, and whoever does not want to be forced to do so.
    "Death, revenge and hell!" (c) "Autumn, autumn, autumn has come to us again. Autumn, autumn, autumn - a wonderful time" (c).
  11. +1
    7 September 2023 14: 19
    Western as I call it "ultra-liberalism" (although there are many other terms here) is the next stage of pagan restoration. On the outer contour, we often observe a grotesque, almost popular antics, like an escapade of pop stars. But in depth, in principle, a rather interesting synthesis of the ancient model is clearly visible, which, by the way, Julian the Apostate also tried to officially push into the Empire and the modern reading of Hindu cults.
    It is impossible to consider this only as "anti-Christianity", because this is also a kind of full-fledged cosmogonic "teaching", by the way, not devoid of rational grain - after all, it is they who "pump" the thesis that it is not the basis that drives the superstructure, but the "subtle" and "rough are equivalent, and all things in the world are positive quantities. The model is interesting, and even with the modern level of computerization it can be digitized - data arrays are now processed well.
    But where papal Christianity turned into a side road is an interesting question. Here, not only the Creed and the schism of churches, there is a suspicion that Rome's passion for Kabbalism, and in its rather strange version, did not go to good use. But this is one of the opinions, there are many other points of view.
  12. +2
    7 September 2023 14: 24
    But how did it happen that Rome, which hated Christians, suddenly turned into the main Christian city


    Read the story and everything will become clear.
    Under Emperor Constantine, Christianity became the state religion.
    And under him was the First Council of Nicaea (recognized by both Catholics and Orthodox, and in general by everyone) in 325.
    Who ranked the episcopal sees in order of importance:
    1. Rome,
    2. Alexandria,
    3. Antioch,
    4. Jerusalem.

    That's how Rome came to the "first place".
  13. +4
    7 September 2023 15: 42
    Yes. Lots of water and low description level.
  14. +2
    7 September 2023 17: 31
    There is a lot more that can be clarified here.
    For example, Christianity in Rome was not at all a religion of the outcasts and the dispossessed. It was the religion of the aristocracy and the wealthy class, which, by the way, led to the death of Diocletian and Nero.
    The mother of Constantine the Great was Christian, and he himself led northern legions to Rome, which were Christians, but of the Arian confession. By modern standards, Constantine's army was an army of heretics.
    In general, there was a lot of wonderful and busy things there. What is not noted is that Rome, in the struggle for power, was repeatedly defeated by the feudal lords.
  15. +2
    7 September 2023 21: 19
    In those years, the West, represented by the Roman Empire, was very similar in its morals to modern advanced Western countries in terms of the absence of any kind of moral and ethical principles and complete licentiousness.
    They say that in those years there was no “terrible” united West and, accordingly, no such concept... winked
  16. 0
    8 September 2023 23: 57
    In those years, the West, represented by the Roman Empire, was very similar in its morals to modern advanced Western countries in terms of the absence of any kind of moral and ethical principles and complete licentiousness.

    What nonsense. Let me guess, you haven’t even read about the Romans on Wikipedia?

    The empire was ruled by Roman emperors and their officials, who, like the vast majority of the empire's subjects, were pagans.

    As Andersen wrote, “in China, all the inhabitants are Chinese, and even the emperor himself is Chinese.” Who else could they have been in Rome?

    In such a situation, in one of the distant Roman provinces in the East, a man appears in Judea

    Well, yes, according to the Koran, Prophet Isa is nothing more than a man, albeit with an unusual biography. I just don’t understand why your Christian pathos is then?

    As you know, the Romans eventually decided to crucify Jesus.

    Secular sources about this have not survived (or initially did not exist), but according to the Bible, the Jews decided this.

    And with the establishment of Emperor Constantine on the Roman throne, Christianity actually turned into the state religion of the Roman Empire. It should be noted that the capital of the empire was already located in the east of the country in Constantinople, and it was there that Christianity began to freely establish itself.

    Not “back then,” but it was under Constantine that she ended up there. Where does the name "Constantinople" actually come from?

    At the end of the XNUMXth century, the Roman Empire split into Western and Eastern, and even then little was known about the “Popes,” much less that Rome was the stronghold of Christianity.

    To you - certainly. You haven’t heard about the Diptych and the Pentarchy. I’ll tell you a secret: if tomorrow the Pope and the Vatican announce the adoption of Orthodox dogmas, then, according to all Orthodox rules, they will automatically again be first on the list of “primacy of honor.”

    Jerusalem, sacred to all monotheistic religions

    Finally. All monotheistic religions. But you should have used native terminology: “people of the Book.” Because monotheistic religions are still a little different. Atonism, Moism, Vaishyavism, Sikhism, many forms of Zoroastrianism and Tengrism are monotheistic, but they do not care about Jerusalem.
  17. 0
    10 September 2023 06: 26
    Yes... eklmn... It's not so bad that "the priests managed to impose...."
    The Pope united the West. And that is why Western civilization exists today.

    But in Russia, Metropolitan Philip of Moscow “failed to impose..”... And Malyuta strangled him in the monastery. And since then the tradition has reigned in Russia: “There is strength in truth, and truth in strength.”

    A society that has not been “imposed” on any ideology for 1000 years, neither religious nor secular, has remained at a semi-savage level. And it can only be the “last carriage” of either a European or an Asian train.