Acting head of the DPR Pushilin declared the inadmissibility of ending the special operation without achieving its goals

32
Acting head of the DPR Pushilin declared the inadmissibility of ending the special operation without achieving its goals

Acting head of the Donetsk People's Republic Denis Pushilin said that the termination of the special operation in Ukraine without achieving all its goals would mean a new armed conflict postponed for some time.

Based on this statement, Pushilin noted that the plan proposed by the Chinese government to resolve the Ukrainian crisis cannot be called acceptable due to the presence of "Ukrainian" points in it. According to the acting head of the DPR, the Chinese plan is a clear demonstration of the difference in approaches.



Russian President Vladimir Putin called the main task of the special operation in Ukraine the protection of people who have been subjected to abuse and genocide by the Kyiv regime for eight years. The ultimate goal of the Ukrainian special operation, according to the head of state, is the complete liberation of Donbass, as well as the creation of conditions that guarantee security for Russia.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry on its official website published a statement reflecting the position of official Beijing regarding the ways of a political settlement of the armed conflict in Ukraine. Among the 12 points proposed by China are calls for the need to respect the state sovereignty of all countries of the world, as well as the resumption of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine and actions aimed at preventing further escalation of the conflict.

The plan proposed by China clearly does not satisfy the aspirations declared by the countries of the West and their Ukrainian vassals, and is proposed, rather, formally in order to indicate its official peace-loving position.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    24 February 2023 19: 53
    We ourselves, without Western pointers and without the advice of the Chinese comrades, will decide how to deal with the territory remaining from the former Ukraine. After all, we do not give advice to our Chinese comrades about Taiwan and Tibet. And no one in the West listened to our opinion about Yugoslavia, Kosovo and Syria with Libya. And so it can be advised to demilitarize Northern Ireland and give freedom to the people of Scotland. And also let the Falklands hold a referendum in Gibraltar. And then there are questions about the territories of the Ainu in Hokkaido and Indian reservations in North America. Are they going to take Manhattan back eventually or not?
    1. +4
      24 February 2023 20: 18
      It would be interesting if the USSR offered China back in the 30s
      .....settling plan...

      relations with Japan, similar to what China is offering us today recourse ?? How would the Chinese be if the Japanese did all sorts of cruelties, and we would settle them peacefully? We just acted differently. They supplied. Taught. Trained. Thanks to this, China has its own aircraft and pilots. And before that, they only knew how to fly kites
      1. +3
        24 February 2023 22: 38
        You have given a very good example.
        But the Chinese have a different mentality. There expediency and benefit - without emotions and empathy.
    2. +1
      24 February 2023 20: 18
      And Nebenzya today paraffined staff members at the UN for abandoning the Chinese plan. Who sings what, Pushilin is right of course.request
  2. +5
    24 February 2023 19: 55
    Based on this statement, Pushilin noted that the plan proposed by the Chinese government to resolve the Ukrainian crisis cannot be called acceptable due to the presence of "Ukrainian" points in it.

    What is it about, a set of good wishes and impossible points. Let's write out the Taiwanese plan in the style of "finish it somehow already, only losses from you, no trading." It seems that either Putin poorly explained to Xi's friend the essence of the matter, or they do not care. Do they really think the US can be persuaded by snotty diplomacy?
    1. +4
      24 February 2023 20: 05
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      either Putin poorly explained to Xi's friend the essence of the matter, or they don't care.

      And how could he explain if he seems to have forgotten about the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine?
      1. VB
        -2
        24 February 2023 20: 14
        He remembers only about his and his friends geshefts.
        1. +1
          24 February 2023 20: 21
          I wish the gesheft would not start a war. For me, everything is simple. What I see, I say. But I didn’t see the gesheft
  3. +1
    24 February 2023 19: 58
    Pushilin can be calm - for me the special operation will never end. I (I hope my children too) will crush these bastards for the rest of my life, but smartly, not like before, otherwise they will sue again. I understand Pushilin's concern.
    1. +9
      24 February 2023 20: 03
      Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
      I understand Pushilin's concern.

      I understand too. A year has passed, and battles are still being fought on the outskirts of Donetsk. The city is under shelling. what
      1. -2
        24 February 2023 20: 42
        It was necessary to crush these reptiles in the 14th (I apologize to snakes and other reptiles). I'm not the government and I don't know why they (our government) recognized Poroshenko... The city is under shelling... hmm... But what to do? I see two options - general mobilization or a strategic strike. They corrected me here that it’s not worth hitting on your own land, which means Lvov and others like it. And as I said, the general and destruction of Ukraine and Ukrainians (I hope you understand that when I say "Ukrainians" I do not mean nationality). Losses will be horrendous. In one case, both from our side and from their side, in the second, only from them. Which option do you choose?
        1. +3
          24 February 2023 22: 52
          Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
          Which option do you choose?

          The third is a Sarmat strike on Bunkerny.
          1. -1
            25 February 2023 04: 21
            Great! I am delighted with your choice. And it's fair.
    2. +4
      24 February 2023 20: 20
      An adequate father will never want to crush someone for his children.
      1. +1
        25 February 2023 04: 56
        An adequate father will not allow his children to be killed.
    3. +1
      24 February 2023 22: 53
      Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
      Pushilin can be calm

      He's relieved right now.
  4. +2
    24 February 2023 19: 58
    Pushilin said everything correctly and most of the population thinks the same way. But decisions are not made at our level and not at his level. And what is there in the thoughts of the Kremlin "celestials" is unknown. Sometimes their words drastically diverge from actions. I really hope not in this case.
    1. +2
      24 February 2023 22: 50
      Quote: Leshak
      Pushilin said everything correctly and most of the population thinks the same way.

      What is the majority of the population?
  5. +12
    24 February 2023 19: 59
    Pushilin is right... Any world without achieving goals and complete transfer of historical territories to Russia... is a delayed and very bloody war
    1. +2
      24 February 2023 22: 50
      Quote: silberwolf88
      and a very bloody war

      Is there a resort there now? With that, to achieve this goal as before China's cancer.
  6. VB
    +2
    24 February 2023 20: 12
    We do not give advice to China, but they consider it possible to give advice and instructions to Russia, because they consider the Russian leadership to be revisionists and traitors. And most importantly, 'lost face'. That's what they call it in the East. And he is a 'delicate matter' How the figures in the foreign ministry, which is in Russia, stirred. The Chinese need to suck up.
    1. 0
      24 February 2023 20: 27
      China, because of us, also teases a little. So he tries to "make a feasible contribution." He then, in a peaceful existence, will become a leader. And we will merge the fuck. And the United States will merge. The United States because of debts, but they will simply crush us. So we will measure who has more. For now, China will have to accept and wait. Although he is a future hegemon, he is not yet a real one.
  7. +1
    24 February 2023 20: 12
    And Pushilin at the same time did not say how exactly to achieve the stated goals without decapitating the Kyiv authorities and without stopping the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with military equipment and mercenaries from the West? No, didn't you?
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. 0
    24 February 2023 20: 30
    Against the backdrop of the proposed Chinese truce, our Foreign Ministry also began to repeat about the readiness of negotiations. We got it already.
    1. +2
      24 February 2023 22: 33
      Not in the background. He has been talking about this for a long time. And the Foreign Ministry has nothing to do with it, it has no opinion of its own.
  10. +5
    24 February 2023 20: 39
    It turns out that Bakhmut is smaller than Anapa .. the sixth or seventh month of the assault

    Which Kyiv? You will all die, you poor fellows.
    1. -1
      24 February 2023 20: 45
      Less is less. But there are now more people there than in civilian life. And if you count the dead ... what
      1. 0
        25 February 2023 05: 38
        But there are now more people there than in civilian life.

        What people
        And if you count with the dead

        You have a strange sense of humor fool
    2. -2
      25 February 2023 09: 45
      Which Kyiv?
      I agree, Kuev should not be in a hurry to take. Feed then at our expense this horde of waiting people? Let only adequate citizens remain there, and the rest will run for lace panties to Europe.
  11. -4
    24 February 2023 20: 49
    Announce that two regions will go to Poland, and one to Hungary. Three will remain Ukraine, and the rest Russia and Belarus.
    Everyone from the front scatter, rush to pick up families, move.
    The whole system in Ukraine will collapse!
  12. +2
    24 February 2023 22: 47
    Our leadership, through the mouth of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not have its own opinion and its own position), voiced its proposals: the cessation of shelling of Russian territories and the adoption of new geopolitical realities (territories) is the most vague moment: along the line of military contact or within the administrative borders of the Russian Federation. In any case, it does not claim more. Here we can dream about anything: about Kyiv, Odessa, but they will make the decisions. But today there is one problem with this - the United States is categorically against it. Their profit from the conflict in its current form is so huge that it is unrealistic to trust.

    As for the position of Ukraine, South Korea was also categorically against the truce and demanded a war to the point of victory (both Koreas considered this land to be theirs). She refused to sign the truce, but...
  13. +3
    24 February 2023 22: 47
    The ultimate goal of the Ukrainian special operation, according to the head of state, is the complete liberation of Donbass, as well as the creation of conditions that guarantee security for Russia.

    With Donbass, it’s more or less clear (it’s not clear why they went to Kiev a year ago), but about the security of Russia, can you decipher how this can be achieved with the help of the NWO?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"