British intelligence and the New York Times “argued” in absentia about the possibility of a large-scale offensive by the Russian army

17
British intelligence and the New York Times “argued” in absentia about the possibility of a large-scale offensive by the Russian army

Western military experts analyzing the situation on the Ukrainian front entered into an absentee polemic regarding forecasts of a possible offensive by the Russian army. So British intelligence in the next report on the situation in Ukraine reports that the Russian Armed Forces have been trying to resume offensive operations since the beginning of January. The British Ministry of Defense believes that the main goal of the Russian command remains the complete liberation of Donbass.

At the same time, the British are very skeptical about both the successes of the Russian troops and the further prospect of a large-scale offensive. British analysts habitually argue that the RF Armed Forces now lack the ammunition and maneuver units necessary for a successful offensive. For this reason, they believe in London, in a week the Russian troops managed to "reconquer the territory of only a few hundred meters."



The British are confident that the command of the Russian army will continue to try to push the front line deep into Ukraine. But due to, allegedly, a lack of resources and allegedly poor training of the mobilized, significant successes of the RF Armed Forces will not be able to achieve.

It is unlikely that in the coming weeks Russia will be able to build up the forces necessary to significantly influence the outcome of the war.

British intelligence concludes.

The author of an article in the American newspaper The New York Times has a different point of view on the ability of the Russian army to implement plans for a large-scale offensive. The expert notes that the attacks of the RF Armed Forces have recently increased significantly in several directions at once, which may indicate the upcoming "Kremlin's largest offensive since the first weeks of the war."

According to the author, Russia has managed to increase its military potential and strengthened the army with thousands of mobilized soldiers. This forced the Armed Forces of Ukraine to switch to heavy defense and abandon the previously announced plans to break through the front.

According to the Ukrainian General Staff, it is not yet known exactly where the Russian Armed Forces will launch a large-scale offensive, but tens of thousands of mobilized soldiers were sent to the northeastern and southeastern regions of Ukraine. The most tense section of the front, according to the expert, is on the northern flank of the Svatovo-Kremennaya line. It's one area where Ukrainian officials say Moscow is gathering troops for a new offensive.

The second direction, where, according to Ukrainian intelligence, the command of the RF Armed Forces deployed significant forces, is Vuhledar. And although Kyiv claims to be successfully repulsing all attacks in this area, the arrival of a large number of mobilized Russian military makes this direction one of the most likely for an imminent large-scale offensive by Russian troops, the author concludes.

It should be noted that British intelligence in its reports mainly relies on data from the Ukrainian side, and those that have long been published in the public domain. Therefore, their conclusions and forecasts often almost completely coincide with the propaganda statements of the Kyiv authorities, which, for example, “held” Soledar, which had already been completely liberated and cleared by Wagner fighters, for a week.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    7 February 2023 11: 42
    We are already betting wassat ... n-yes, completely beaten off
    1. +6
      7 February 2023 11: 47
      Unfortunately, I think they pretend to be fools.
      You can't relax with this crowd.
      It is simply impossible to write nonsense in the public domain on behalf of serious structures, a good staging is needed here.
      And in terms of lies and intrigues, the "partners" are great masters
      1. 0
        7 February 2023 11: 52
        Quote: Romanenko
        Unfortunately, I think they pretend to be fools.

        Which of the two? laughing Wait a minute, the British Scientists will catch up, soooo ... they will prove it !!! Well, and only then Shoigu will come down slowly and slowly and judge the whole herd am
      2. +1
        7 February 2023 11: 59
        Quote: Romanenko
        Unfortunately, I think they pretend to be fools.

        It may well be that they are not pretending. They have already cut so much space that all the glory of the Mi-6 rests on snot and Ian Fleming. For example, how could one oversleep the withdrawal from Afghanistan, thanks to which the SAS draped in burqas and on foot ?! Or their recent blunder with an attempt to buy pilots of the Aerospace Forces in the NWO so that the planes would be hijacked? These de bills are just reference ... But - mi-6. The greyish Crimea, which they did not expect, the past rearmament of the Russian army, the beginning of the NVO - all this is a complete surprise. That is, they are non-professionals.
        1. 0
          7 February 2023 12: 35
          Ilya, hi. Well, what do you want from "British scientists who have proved" that Russia no longer has the strength, there is no ammunition. Here is a new trick, the arrogant Saxons threw introductory information about the section of "square" according to the Korean version into the "minds" of the natives of the outskirts. Ours have already sent this "idea" ... to the Polish border.)
  2. +4
    7 February 2023 11: 50
    Yes, everything is studied there under a magnifying glass in 24/7 mode, but only in other departments that will not say anything, in the same old way, blue / red flags are moved around the map, trying to unravel the plan of action + space intelligence data is superimposed with the movement of reserves, trains with fuel and equipment. And in the media, the same couch strategists are "fighting" as in VO. In the same way, you can argue with your opponent at the counter in a wine glass - there are a lot of words, but what's the point?
    1. 0
      8 February 2023 17: 22
      space reconnaissance data is superimposed with the movement of reserves, echelons with fuel and lubricants and equipment. And in the media, the same couch strategists are "fighting" as in VO

      Oh no. At VO, couch experts are stronger than Western media. We know ourselves well, and the enemy too. smile In addition, half of the VO are retirees.
  3. -1
    7 February 2023 11: 50
    British intelligence in their reports mainly relies on data from the Ukrainian side
    This is felt from their victorious reports to the Ukrainian side and pessimistic forecasts regarding the Russian army. And it is not at all surprising, because. in London they prefer to operate with their dreams based on their arrogance, and not reality. Therefore, most likely, future events for the British will be like a butt on the head. They deserve it.
  4. +3
    7 February 2023 11: 53
    The main thing is not to oversleep the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on Melitopol and Berdyansk.
  5. +1
    7 February 2023 11: 59
    Of course, there will be no offensive that is expected, there will be no breakthroughs, girths, captures, there will be grinding from a safe (possible loss) distance. No matter how well-trained a fighter is, when a hail packet covers you, in addition to accurate artillery strikes on equipment, the entire offensive ends immediately. And yes, the shells are not endless, the resources of barrels, equipment, too, even when we fired several tens of thousands of shells a few months ago, they also didn’t go anywhere, big losses appeared.
  6. -2
    7 February 2023 12: 05
    British scientists argued with British doctors who would be the first to discover the existence of two-headed people on Earth.
  7. +2
    7 February 2023 12: 09
    I agree with British intelligence, objectively everything is so, we cannot pull off a big offensive, but the tactical ones, in anticipation of the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, may well bleed this offensive, and then, if we hold out, we can go on a counterattack. The main thing is to have something.
  8. +1
    7 February 2023 12: 19
    .... - British intelligence concludes.
    The author of an article in the American newspaper The New York Times has a different point of view on the ability of the Russian army to implement plans for a large-scale offensive.
    It is idiotic to compare the conclusion of "British intelligence" with the opinion of the author of an article in a newspaper. At the same time, the "conclusion" may well be outright propaganda bullshit, but, nevertheless. Hmm, those who like to compare brown with warm.
    1. +2
      7 February 2023 12: 34
      Quote: Vladimir Postnikov
      It's idiotic compare the conclusion of "British intelligence" with the opinion of the author of the article in the newspaper.

      Well, in general, to consider that the conclusion of "British intelligence" was brought to your attention is the height of idiocy .... don't you think? feel
      1. +1
        7 February 2023 13: 47
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Well, in general, to consider that the conclusion of "British intelligence" was brought to your attention is the height of idiocy .... don't you think?
        Is that what you "think"? You have the right. I didn't mention anything about it. I wrote about comparing "sources", and not about comparing the reliability of these sources.
  9. +2
    7 February 2023 13: 32
    Hm. as in a joke ... I'll paraphrase a little ... The "British scientists" argued with the Yankees hacks from the New York Times. what happens if you cross a hedgehog with a viper, well, ours immediately gave out ... three meters of barbed wire ... and here they are computer, freezes along the way
  10. 0
    8 February 2023 16: 58
    The satellite constellation of the West makes it possible to accurately determine whether a large-scale offensive is planned or not, given that the forces drawn to the borders in this case will be very clearly visible.