Military Review

The US Transportation Administration loaded the Bradley infantry fighting vehicles destined for Ukraine for maritime transport

48
The US Transportation Administration loaded the Bradley infantry fighting vehicles destined for Ukraine for maritime transport

The United States sent another batch of armored vehicles to Ukraine, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles will be delivered to Europe by sea. This was reported by the press service of the US Transportation Administration, which is engaged in transportation in the interests of the US armed forces.


A batch of over 60 infantry fighting vehicles was loaded on board a transport ship in the port of Charleston in North Carolina. The ship will proceed to Europe, where the port, most likely the Netherlands, will be unloaded. Further, the equipment will be delivered by rail to the territory of Poland, and from there to Ukraine. Deadlines have not yet been announced.

Soldiers load a batch of American infantry fighting vehicles onto a ship in the port of Charleston, North Carolina. The shipments of this military hardware are part of a $2,85 billion US military aid deal that was announced earlier this year.

- Reported the press service.

Judging by the photo, all the equipment is delivered unarmed, the BMP lacks M242 Bushmaster 25 mm automatic cannons, a coaxial 7,62 mm machine gun and TOW anti-tank missiles. Most likely, weapons will be installed before sending armored vehicles directly to Ukraine.

Earlier, the Pentagon said that all the Bradley infantry fighting vehicles promised to Kyiv would be delivered to Ukraine in the "near future." In the meantime, although the equipment has not yet arrived, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have already begun to form units for it, at the same time, crews are being trained on American infantry fighting vehicles in Germany. Training began at the combined arms training base at Grafenwöhr in Bavaria.
48 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 6 February 2023 15: 05
    +10
    Do we have these super cool new quiet subs? If there is, why are such transports not drowned?
    1. SwR9
      SwR9 6 February 2023 15: 11
      -2
      Because they will then sink our cargo ship or tanker.
      1. Bingo
        Bingo 6 February 2023 15: 17
        +11
        This excuse no longer works after undermining the joint venture. So what exactly will it be right for them to run into a drifting mine
        1. Nikolaevich79
          Nikolaevich79 6 February 2023 16: 49
          +1
          moreover, the Ukrainian one, which they also supplied
        2. Henri Mik
          Henri Mik 6 February 2023 19: 14
          +3
          To fly into a mine from the times of the Second World War and patty. Crabs also need something to eat.
      2. Machito
        Machito 6 February 2023 15: 19
        +1
        Sunk them all. Drown them all.
        The box must be mined by saboteurs-submariners right in the port of Charleston. It is better to use American mines.
      3. The black
        The black 6 February 2023 15: 21
        +4
        Ukrovermacht is being prepared for the last pig jerk ....
      4. Grandfather Mozai
        Grandfather Mozai 6 February 2023 15: 35
        0
        The states have unwound the Nord Stream, have we sunk at least something for this?
        1. topol717
          topol717 6 February 2023 16: 05
          0
          Quote: Grandfather Mozai
          The states have unwound the Nord Stream, have we sunk at least something for this?

          Last spring, Bashirov and Petrov unwound a gas-liquefying terminal on the Atlantic coast. But this is not accurate, it may be a coincidence.
      5. Paul Siebert
        Paul Siebert 6 February 2023 15: 39
        +1
        Quote from: SwR9
        Because they will then sink our cargo ship or tanker.

        We can do them much more trouble.
        USA is in the other hemisphere. And they get to markets mainly by seas and oceans. Yes, and natural resources are being transported to America by ships.
        Well, how are we going to start drowning everything amerskoe?
        How much then the bucks will be? You mean a penny? wink
        1. Doccor18
          Doccor18 6 February 2023 17: 30
          +6
          Quote: Paul Siebert
          Well, how are we going to start drowning everything amerskoe?

          Yep, let's start...
          We will rebuild the ocean fleet and ...
        2. blackGRAIL
          blackGRAIL 6 February 2023 20: 10
          0
          After that, our fleet will simply be destroyed. Perhaps something closed at the bases will survive and that is not a fact. At the same time, the Americans are constantly developing in anti-submarine technologies, so the invisibility of Soviet submarines is still a very big question.
        3. Rabioso
          Rabioso 7 February 2023 00: 38
          +1
          I am also a fan of fantasy. And there are many fans of this genre. The States are still a maritime power and have more opportunities to sink and counter such threats.
      6. fif21
        fif21 6 February 2023 15: 58
        -2
        Quote from: SwR9
        Because they will then sink our cargo ship or tanker.

        Who ? Mattress covers? These imbeciles? Fashington must be destroyed!
    2. PROXOR
      PROXOR 6 February 2023 15: 18
      +7
      Yes. Varshavyanka. And even without a torpedo you can do without. Marine mini. "Accidentally" popped up right in front of the nose of the transport.
      After the sabotage on Nord Stream 2, nothing interferes with Alaverdi.
      1. blackGRAIL
        blackGRAIL 6 February 2023 20: 17
        +2
        The invisibility of Varshavyanka is greatly exaggerated. They are invisible only in Runet articles. At the same time, the Western press wrote about the "interception" of the submarine by anti-submarine aircraft. At the same time, the nature of its behavior in the air (going in a straight line to a certain object and then keeping it in the funnel, i.e., the absence of long search activities) suggests excellent visibility of Varshavyanka. Here on VO there were many articles on the topic of the visibility of our submarines.
        1. PROXOR
          PROXOR 9 February 2023 17: 23
          0
          In order to direct an anti-submarine, you need to know where to send it.
    3. topol717
      topol717 6 February 2023 16: 03
      0
      Quote: Incvizitor
      Do we have these super cool new quiet subs? If there is, why are such transports not drowned?

      It is also written there that all the pieces of iron are sailing without weapons, without cannons and machine guns, and there are no shells there either.
      Well, until it is transferred to the VUS, it still belongs to NATO. Do you want a war with NATO?
      1. yho
        yho 6 February 2023 19: 02
        +1
        So we have been at war with NATO for 10 months already, they are talking about it from all TV channels. It turns out some kind of game in one goal.
  2. Romanenko
    Romanenko 6 February 2023 15: 06
    +1
    I remember the song about the dead horses that were taken by the ship Gloria to the war...
    A thousand horses, horseshoes, four thousand happiness did not bring anyone
    The mine pierced the bottom of the ship far away from the earth ....
    Why?
  3. voice of reason
    voice of reason 6 February 2023 15: 06
    -1
    I also think that transport is a legitimate military target. Drown the fuck and express concern about the escalation.
    1. Romanenko
      Romanenko 6 February 2023 15: 20
      +1
      In the 17-18 centuries, many "gentlemen of fortune" who wanted to earn extra money could receive an official letter of marque from the hands of the English, by the way, queen and easily sink any ships providing military and other assistance to the same Spain. At the beginning of the 20th century and a little later, the raiders of the belligerents stopped the sea transports of other states, even those not officially participating in the war and after inspecting the cargo, either left the "prize" team there, ferrying the ship to a neutral port, or let the ship with the cargo sink to the bottom.
      I wonder if these provisions have been repealed?
      1. yuriy1863
        yuriy1863 7 February 2023 13: 26
        +1
        Does Prigozhin, by any chance, have his own small but effective fleet with real sea wolves?
    2. blackGRAIL
      blackGRAIL 6 February 2023 20: 19
      0
      The Americans did not consider the Soviet transports that delivered weapons to the Viet Cong a legitimate target.
  4. alexander 66
    alexander 66 6 February 2023 15: 16
    +3
    Based on what to heat? What do we have with the Ukrainians or with whom is there a war? It is necessary to beat on the railway on the border with all the proletarian hatred.
    1. NAF-NAF
      NAF-NAF 6 February 2023 16: 21
      0
      and on what basis did they slam the joint venture? Exactly on the same grounds. The main thing is that there are no witnesses left.
    2. MstislavHrabr
      MstislavHrabr 6 February 2023 17: 03
      -1
      Hand over a couple of submarines to PMC "Wagner".
    3. yho
      yho 6 February 2023 19: 04
      -2
      Who sank Moscow?
      For Moscow! For Borodino!
  5. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 6 February 2023 15: 19
    0
    all equipment delivered without weapons, The IFV lacks the 242mm M25 Bushmaster automatic cannon, coaxial 7,62mm machine gun, and TOW anti-tank missile mounts.
    Are the Dutch or Poles skillful, tearing cannons on the move? ... request
  6. Mint Gingerbread
    Mint Gingerbread 6 February 2023 15: 31
    -4
    How are you going to burn it? This ship, in your opinion, is not protected by a convoy with anti-submarine and air defense weapons? laughing
  7. AshPoseidon
    AshPoseidon 6 February 2023 15: 33
    -4
    On a head-on course, an iceberg will come across some night. Well, they didn’t part in the ocean, it happens.
  8. Wanderer_GO
    Wanderer_GO 6 February 2023 15: 34
    -2
    "Marine PMC", but in fact "raiders of the 21st century ...
  9. storm
    storm 6 February 2023 15: 47
    0
    And suddenly this transport suddenly exploded in the Baltic Sea, just like SP-1 and SP-2.
    There are also a lot of mines from the Second World War ....
  10. Alex242
    Alex242 6 February 2023 15: 54
    +1
    A batch of over 60 infantry fighting vehicles was loaded on board a transport ship in the port of Charleston in North Carolina. The ship will proceed to Europe, where the port, most likely the Netherlands, will be unloaded. Further, the equipment will be delivered by rail to the territory of Poland, and from there to Ukraine. Deadlines have not yet been announced.

    through to be expected on the battlefields......
  11. Alex242
    Alex242 6 February 2023 15: 56
    0
    Quote: Romanenko
    In the 17-18 centuries, many "gentlemen of fortune" who wanted to earn extra money could receive an official letter of marque from the hands of the English, by the way, queen and easily sink any ships providing military and other assistance to the same Spain. At the beginning of the 20th century and a little later, the raiders of the belligerents stopped the sea transports of other states, even those not officially participating in the war and after inspecting the cargo, either left the "prize" team there, ferrying the ship to a neutral port, or let the ship with the cargo sink to the bottom.
    I wonder if these provisions have been repealed?

    probably with an amendment - only for the British ....
  12. 1erWahrheitsMinister_1984
    1erWahrheitsMinister_1984 6 February 2023 16: 06
    0
    Eine sehr gute Gelegenheit, ein wenig "Schiffe-Versenken" zu spielen;
    wenn nicht JETZT wann dann!?! am
  13. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 6 February 2023 16: 18
    +2
    Somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic, the perfect storm must be waiting for them ...
  14. spirit
    spirit 6 February 2023 16: 47
    +1
    A year has already passed, not a single train or tanker has been attacked. But in the VO they are still talking about explosions somewhere out there. Oh, naivety)
  15. VLAD-96
    VLAD-96 6 February 2023 17: 26
    0
    Sink! There will be a beautiful place for scuba divers under water, the cemetery of the sunken Bradley
  16. Aron Finkilstein
    Aron Finkilstein 6 February 2023 19: 58
    0
    The only option to counter the supply of weapons by sea for the Armed Forces of Ukraine is the creation of a marine analogue of the PMC "Wagner" with the transfer of this PMC "for rent" of several diesel-electric submarines and nuclear submarines, with the issuance of a "Letter of Letters" with the right to seize and destroy any ships belonging to the participating countries in the supply of arms for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. You can say as much as you like that NATO is not participating in the war, but everyone understands that this is no longer the case ... The supply of weapons by a third party to one of the parties to an armed conflict is, in fact, participation in the war on the side of the country against which arms deliveries. Otherwise, the US can transfer the Armed Forces of Ukraine and nuclear weapons, continuing to assert that the US and NATO are not at war with Russia...
    1. blackGRAIL
      blackGRAIL 6 February 2023 20: 23
      +2
      This naval PMC will be destroyed very quickly by the NATO Navy. Alas, we cannot compete with them at sea.
  17. digger
    digger 6 February 2023 20: 40
    0
    I am waiting for an answer for blowing up SP-1 and SP-2 - to torpedo these barges with infantry fighting vehicles to hell. Send a couple of nuclear submarines and that's it.
    1. Andrey Andreev_2
      Andrey Andreev_2 8 February 2023 10: 45
      0
      What are the nuclear submarines? For these troughs, a couple of anti-ship missiles are enough
  18. pexotinec
    pexotinec 6 February 2023 20: 43
    0
    Some kind of old naval mine would have swum under the hull. They are constantly lucky to crash into different ships in the clear sea
  19. 75 Sergey
    75 Sergey 8 February 2023 00: 12
    0
    We won't heat up yet.
    But to make sure that this crap does not cross the border of Poland towards the Armed Forces of Ukraine - we can!
    They need to be cut off from the Polish border, but how, will we have enough strength and resources? Mobilization - so-so, the mobilization of the economy is not visible.
  20. james
    james 8 February 2023 10: 40
    0
    Reported, now offer to help unload.
  21. Andrey Andreev_2
    Andrey Andreev_2 8 February 2023 10: 44
    0
    If we consider the means of delivering weapons and military equipment to Ukraine as a legitimate target, then we must definitely drown!
  22. Andrey Andreev_2
    Andrey Andreev_2 8 February 2023 10: 48
    0
    I can’t understand why we test Poseidons in our north? Money - down the drain!