The US Transportation Administration loaded the Bradley infantry fighting vehicles destined for Ukraine for maritime transport

The United States sent another batch of armored vehicles to Ukraine, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles will be delivered to Europe by sea. This was reported by the press service of the US Transportation Administration, which is engaged in transportation in the interests of the US armed forces.

A batch of over 60 infantry fighting vehicles was loaded on board a transport ship in the port of Charleston in North Carolina. The ship will proceed to Europe, where the port, most likely the Netherlands, will be unloaded. Further, the equipment will be delivered by rail to the territory of Poland, and from there to Ukraine. Deadlines have not yet been announced.

Soldiers load a batch of American infantry fighting vehicles onto a ship in the port of Charleston, North Carolina. The shipments of this military hardware are part of a $2,85 billion US military aid deal that was announced earlier this year.

- Reported the press service.

Judging by the photo, all the equipment is delivered unarmed, the BMP lacks M242 Bushmaster 25 mm automatic cannons, a coaxial 7,62 mm machine gun and TOW anti-tank missiles. Most likely, weapons will be installed before sending armored vehicles directly to Ukraine.

Earlier, the Pentagon said that all the Bradley infantry fighting vehicles promised to Kyiv would be delivered to Ukraine in the "near future." In the meantime, although the equipment has not yet arrived, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have already begun to form units for it, at the same time, crews are being trained on American infantry fighting vehicles in Germany. Training began at the combined arms training base at Grafenwöhr in Bavaria.

Comments

[Incvizitor]

Do we have these super cool new quiet subs? If there is, why are such transports not drowned?

[SwR9]

Because they will then sink our cargo ship or tanker.

[Bingo]

This excuse no longer works after undermining the joint venture. So what exactly will it be right for them to run into a drifting mine

[Nikolaevich79]

moreover, the Ukrainian one, which they also supplied

[Henri Mik]

To fly into a mine from the times of the Second World War and patty. Crabs also need something to eat.

[Machito]

Sunk them all. Drown them all.
The box must be mined by saboteurs-submariners right in the port of Charleston. It is better to use American mines.

[The black]

Ukrovermacht is being prepared for the last pig jerk ....

[Grandfather Mozai]

The states have unwound the Nord Stream, have we sunk at least something for this?

[topol717]

Quote: Grandfather Mozai

The states have unwound the Nord Stream, have we sunk at least something for this?

Last spring, Bashirov and Petrov unwound a gas-liquefying terminal on the Atlantic coast. But this is not accurate, it may be a coincidence.

[Paul Siebert]

Quote from: SwR9

Because they will then sink our cargo ship or tanker.

We can do them much more trouble.
USA is in the other hemisphere. And they get to markets mainly by seas and oceans. Yes, and natural resources are being transported to America by ships.
Well, how are we going to start drowning everything amerskoe?
How much then the bucks will be? You mean a penny?

[Doccor18]

Quote: Paul Siebert

Well, how are we going to start drowning everything amerskoe?

Yep, let's start...
We will rebuild the ocean fleet and ...

[blackGRAIL]

After that, our fleet will simply be destroyed. Perhaps something closed at the bases will survive and that is not a fact. At the same time, the Americans are constantly developing in anti-submarine technologies, so the invisibility of Soviet submarines is still a very big question.

[Rabioso]

I am also a fan of fantasy. And there are many fans of this genre. The States are still a maritime power and have more opportunities to sink and counter such threats.

[fif21]

Quote from: SwR9

Because they will then sink our cargo ship or tanker.

Who ? Mattress covers? These imbeciles? Fashington must be destroyed!

[PROXOR]

Yes. Varshavyanka. And even without a torpedo you can do without. Marine mini. "Accidentally" popped up right in front of the nose of the transport.
After the sabotage on Nord Stream 2, nothing interferes with Alaverdi.

[blackGRAIL]

The invisibility of Varshavyanka is greatly exaggerated. They are invisible only in Runet articles. At the same time, the Western press wrote about the "interception" of the submarine by anti-submarine aircraft. At the same time, the nature of its behavior in the air (going in a straight line to a certain object and then keeping it in the funnel, i.e., the absence of long search activities) suggests excellent visibility of Varshavyanka. Here on VO there were many articles on the topic of the visibility of our submarines.

[PROXOR]

In order to direct an anti-submarine, you need to know where to send it.

[topol717]

Quote: Incvizitor

Do we have these super cool new quiet subs? If there is, why are such transports not drowned?

It is also written there that all the pieces of iron are sailing without weapons, without cannons and machine guns, and there are no shells there either.
Well, until it is transferred to the VUS, it still belongs to NATO. Do you want a war with NATO?

[yho]

So we have been at war with NATO for 10 months already, they are talking about it from all TV channels. It turns out some kind of game in one goal.

[Romanenko]

I remember the song about the dead horses that were taken by the ship Gloria to the war...
A thousand horses, horseshoes, four thousand happiness did not bring anyone
The mine pierced the bottom of the ship far away from the earth ....
Why?

[voice of reason]

I also think that transport is a legitimate military target. Drown the fuck and express concern about the escalation.

[Romanenko]

In the 17-18 centuries, many "gentlemen of fortune" who wanted to earn extra money could receive an official letter of marque from the hands of the English, by the way, queen and easily sink any ships providing military and other assistance to the same Spain. At the beginning of the 20th century and a little later, the raiders of the belligerents stopped the sea transports of other states, even those not officially participating in the war and after inspecting the cargo, either left the "prize" team there, ferrying the ship to a neutral port, or let the ship with the cargo sink to the bottom.
I wonder if these provisions have been repealed?

[yuriy1863]

Does Prigozhin, by any chance, have his own small but effective fleet with real sea wolves?

[blackGRAIL]

The Americans did not consider the Soviet transports that delivered weapons to the Viet Cong a legitimate target.

[alexander 66]

Based on what to heat? What do we have with the Ukrainians or with whom is there a war? It is necessary to beat on the railway on the border with all the proletarian hatred.

[NAF-NAF]

and on what basis did they slam the joint venture? Exactly on the same grounds. The main thing is that there are no witnesses left.

[MstislavHrabr]

Hand over a couple of submarines to PMC "Wagner".

[yho]

Who sank Moscow?
For Moscow! For Borodino!

[Mavrikiy]

all equipment delivered without weapons, The IFV lacks the 242mm M25 Bushmaster automatic cannon, coaxial 7,62mm machine gun, and TOW anti-tank missile mounts.

Are the Dutch or Poles skillful, tearing cannons on the move? ...

[Mint Gingerbread]

How are you going to burn it? This ship, in your opinion, is not protected by a convoy with anti-submarine and air defense weapons?

[AshPoseidon]

On a head-on course, an iceberg will come across some night. Well, they didn’t part in the ocean, it happens.

[Wanderer_GO]

"Marine PMC", but in fact "raiders of the 21st century ...

[storm]

And suddenly this transport suddenly exploded in the Baltic Sea, just like SP-1 and SP-2.
There are also a lot of mines from the Second World War ....

[Alex242]

A batch of over 60 infantry fighting vehicles was loaded on board a transport ship in the port of Charleston in North Carolina. The ship will proceed to Europe, where the port, most likely the Netherlands, will be unloaded. Further, the equipment will be delivered by rail to the territory of Poland, and from there to Ukraine. Deadlines have not yet been announced.

through to be expected on the battlefields......

[Alex242]

Quote: Romanenko

In the 17-18 centuries, many "gentlemen of fortune" who wanted to earn extra money could receive an official letter of marque from the hands of the English, by the way, queen and easily sink any ships providing military and other assistance to the same Spain. At the beginning of the 20th century and a little later, the raiders of the belligerents stopped the sea transports of other states, even those not officially participating in the war and after inspecting the cargo, either left the "prize" team there, ferrying the ship to a neutral port, or let the ship with the cargo sink to the bottom.
I wonder if these provisions have been repealed?

probably with an amendment - only for the British ....

[1erWahrheitsMinister_1984]

Eine sehr gute Gelegenheit, ein wenig "Schiffe-Versenken" zu spielen;
wenn nicht JETZT wann dann!?!

[Ezekiel 25-17]

Somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic, the perfect storm must be waiting for them ...

[spirit]

A year has already passed, not a single train or tanker has been attacked. But in the VO they are still talking about explosions somewhere out there. Oh, naivety)

[VLAD-96]

Sink! There will be a beautiful place for scuba divers under water, the cemetery of the sunken Bradley

[Aron Finkilstein]

The only option to counter the supply of weapons by sea for the Armed Forces of Ukraine is the creation of a marine analogue of the PMC "Wagner" with the transfer of this PMC "for rent" of several diesel-electric submarines and nuclear submarines, with the issuance of a "Letter of Letters" with the right to seize and destroy any ships belonging to the participating countries in the supply of arms for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. You can say as much as you like that NATO is not participating in the war, but everyone understands that this is no longer the case ... The supply of weapons by a third party to one of the parties to an armed conflict is, in fact, participation in the war on the side of the country against which arms deliveries. Otherwise, the US can transfer the Armed Forces of Ukraine and nuclear weapons, continuing to assert that the US and NATO are not at war with Russia...

[blackGRAIL]

This naval PMC will be destroyed very quickly by the NATO Navy. Alas, we cannot compete with them at sea.

[digger]

I am waiting for an answer for blowing up SP-1 and SP-2 - to torpedo these barges with infantry fighting vehicles to hell. Send a couple of nuclear submarines and that's it.

[Andrey Andreev_2]

What are the nuclear submarines? For these troughs, a couple of anti-ship missiles are enough

[pexotinec]

Some kind of old naval mine would have swum under the hull. They are constantly lucky to crash into different ships in the clear sea

[75 Sergey]

We won't heat up yet.
But to make sure that this crap does not cross the border of Poland towards the Armed Forces of Ukraine - we can!
They need to be cut off from the Polish border, but how, will we have enough strength and resources? Mobilization - so-so, the mobilization of the economy is not visible.

[james]

Reported, now offer to help unload.

[Andrey Andreev_2]

If we consider the means of delivering weapons and military equipment to Ukraine as a legitimate target, then we must definitely drown!

[Andrey Andreev_2]

I can’t understand why we test Poseidons in our north? Money - down the drain!