CIA director: The next six months will be decisive in the conflict in Ukraine

Another forecast on the course of events in Ukraine was presented to the CIA. A note with reference to the director of the Central Intelligence Agency was published by a journalist of the American channel CBS.

It is noted that William Burns, during his speech at Georgetown University, said that the next six months would be decisive and critical in the conflict in Ukraine.

American journalist Olivia Gazis believes that Burns made such a statement against the backdrop of the fact that the West is beginning to get tired of the “Ukrainian agenda”, and Moscow is “betting on it”.

According to Gazis, Burns also said that Washington does not consider Moscow to be serious about the negotiation process.

This material appeared in the US press against the background of another material about William Burns - in the Swiss press. Recall that the Swiss publication NZZ published an article stating that Burns allegedly voiced to Russian officials the idea of ​​the White House's readiness to recognize 20 percent of Ukrainian territory for Russia in order to end the conflict. With the same idea, Burns made a trip to Kyiv. However, the parties allegedly did not accept the “peace plan” of the United States, and therefore, in the end, President Biden “decided to approve the supply of tanks Ukraine. "

Earlier, officials of various ranks in the US and Europe have repeatedly stated that "the next few months in the conflict in Ukraine will be decisive." However, the timing of the “decisive” period of time is shifted every time. Now Burns is making it clear to Kyiv that if it does not achieve significant success at the front before the summer, then it will become increasingly difficult to knock out billions of dollars in funding.

Comments

[svp67]

CIA director: The next six months will be decisive in the conflict in Ukraine

But I do not agree. This is just a stage in this conflict with NATO

[Silver99]

I agree, it looks like just a warm-up. Russia certainly will not lose in this conflict, even if they flood the whole of Ukraine with Western weapons, their human resources are weak and depleted, the loss of Vuhledar and Artemovsk will undermine their morale, the losses are huge and a clash with the United States seems to be becoming inevitable, they are losing control of the world and it is unlikely whether they agree with it. There is a struggle for survival, the United States is a scavenger robber who lives off world wars, without them there will be peace in the world.

[Alexander 3]

Vanga foresaw the United States will not.

[Leader_Barmaleev]

There is one small nuance - America needs to weaken Russia as much as possible before a direct clash with China. The war between America and China is really inevitable, since the economic background is fully formed on all counts, and pitting Russia and Europe on the territory of Ukraine is just a way to deprive China of both an ally and a sales market. Something like this.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Leader_Barmaleev

There is one small nuance - America needs to weaken Russia as much as possible before a direct clash with China. The war between America and China is really inevitable, since the economic background is fully formed on all counts, and pitting Russia and Europe on the territory of Ukraine is just a way to deprive China of both an ally and a sales market. Something like this.

This is possible, but only if Russia loses, which is impossible a priori, because. she will drag this American devil with NATO demons with her. Of course, they can weaken, through undermining the economy, but this will not be chronic and long-term. the global need for energy resources will not go anywhere, and there is simply nothing to replace the volumes supplied from Russia to the world market. China, having entered into a confrontation with mattresses, even being cut off from trade sea routes (80% of trade), will still receive all the resources necessary for the war (military, energy, food) across the border with Russia. At the current stage of time, the mattresses will not succeed in destroying this tandem, the Russian Federation + China, as well as defeating one of them in a direct confrontation, too, since in any case the United States will receive unacceptable damage.

[Cananecat]

Quote: svp67

But I do not agree

Remember the summer of the 22nd ... all the same "next six months"

[blackGRAIL]

But it can really become a significant milestone: whether the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to repeat the Kherson success with the help of spring weapon packages or not. The situation is completely different - we have equipped our defensive lines and the size of the group has been increased. Therefore, the moment can really be decisive: are the Armed Forces of Ukraine capable of attacking with the help of the West or not. Decisive for the US strategy: to supply Ukraine with weapons in the amount and range for offensive operations or for defense to the last. Since the US task of deindustrialization of Europe has not yet been completed, and peace in Ukraine would be a disaster for the US: the Europeans will rush to restore at least partially relations.

[Lech from Android.]

I am skeptical about any forecasts of the Anglo-Saxons ... too many lies and lies, too much outright disinformation, too much imposition of their rules and indeed the whole picture of the world.
The situation in the NWO zone is unpredictable in principle ... nothing can be said with absolute certainty.

[Alexander 3]

The very planning of the conflict, starting with the Maidan, is a failure. Yes, and no one has declared war on us yet.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Lech from Android.

The situation in the NWO zone is unpredictable in principle ... nothing can be said with absolute certainty.

This situation with the Mexican volcano Popocatepetl is unpredictable, and it is located at a distance of less than 3000 km from Yellowstone.
And the situation of NWO is predictable. Moreover, it can be planned and predicted.
Ignoring the supply of weapons to Ukraine, the inadequacy of Russia's responses on Ukrainian territory, the continuation of trade cooperation with enemy countries for the sake of "hell knows what" (for talking about money for salaries and pensions when withdrawing hundreds of billions of dollars from the country and spending billions of rubles on the maintenance of unnecessary "servants people" in the form of the same Federation Council or "symbol of democracy and liberalism" in the form of the EBN center, and the progressive personal income tax scale and taxes on the withdrawal of capital, which can return trillions of rubles to the country, are ignored), non-use of the latest weapons, poor efficiency in the use of existing ones, veiled issues of assistance from friendly countries will not bring victory closer.
Dad of Nikita Sergeevich, once wrote:

The victory was not easy
But Lenin led the people
And Lenin saw far
For many years to come.

And the truth of their ideas -
Great person -
He is all working people
United forever.

Whether the eminent son will write something like this about NWO or about someone else remains a mystery. And you can talk until you're blue in the face about the victory of the Soviet people in the Second World War, inserting remarks about galoshes produced in the USSR. You can beat yourself in the chest, arguing that the Battle of Stalingrad is the decisive stage of the Great Patriotic War and leave without attention and decision the issue of returning the name to the city, known to the whole world, and the return of the Victory flag, one color of which made the enemies go berserk and go in a powerless state. malice.

[Andron78]

It is strange that the director of the CIA does not realize that his peace plan today is a continuation of the war tomorrow, but in fact it is Minsk-3, but with more complex and grave consequences for Russia. Offering such an option to Moscow is tantamount to letting gas into a puddle. Or maybe he understands, it’s just that the States did this stupidity to give themselves a peaceful look before the escalation associated with the supply of weapons. Like the whole world is stupid, not understanding what's what. There is only one answer to such an initiative - to attack, bomb, wet, take away, to the last Abrams.

[old]

it’s just that the States did this stupidity to give themselves a peaceful look before the escalation associated with the supply of weapons. Like the whole world is crazy...

From their point of view, the whole world is savages, who are divided into those who can be easily bought not even for beads, but for empty promises, and those who need bribery and blackmail. In rare cases where this does not work, a revolver is used. And the favorite fun is to pit the Indian tribes against each other, selling them weapons, and then bang the weakened winner and take his land for himself.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Andron78

It's strange that the director of the CIA does not understand

They understand everything there, otherwise the CIA officers would not have been running around the Kremlin like they were on Broadway. It is in Russia that they cannot give a final assessment to those organizations and structures that have become tools in the hands of Satanists, and have set as their goal the COMPLETE AND FINAL DESTRUCTION OF RUSSIA.
Believe me, if some “guarantor” does not come up with the idea to clearly demonstrate to the world what awaits the enemies of Russia, soon those “cunningly crafted” missiles and bombs will burst on our territory, and airplanes and other UAVs will fly over peaceful cities ...
A situation should be created when there will be no one and nowhere to betray anything ...

[Uprun]

After Odessa, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Sumy, one can talk about the neutral status of the outskirts and holding referendums in Poltava, Dnepropetrovsk, etc., where and with whom they want to live under the auspices of independent observers of the BRICS countries, as an option. Russian lands must return home. Although the entire tribaltia is also Russian land, since it was bought out by Peter I. In 2014, they started, to be continued.

[Silver99]

I also agree, no matter how capricious it may sound, but complete control over the Black Sea coast after the capture of Odessa, Nikolaev and Ochakov is a guarantee of Russia's further security, and do not forget about Transnistria, they are looking at Russia with hope and waiting for the exit to the common border.

[old]

After Odessa, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Sumy, you can talk about the neutral status of the outskirts and holding referendums

Minke whales fulfill all agreements only as long as they are beneficial to them.

[alexey_444]

This passage to the outskirts, if tens of thousands of orcs do not put in an attack on the Crimea, then help will stop. For the first time, the West is not ready for a long war, but we are ready, where there are machines, technologies to buy and with whom to trade, and not how to distribute our resources for free in the USSR. There will be an offensive in the summer, I hope during this time we will still have a thousand lancets planning bombs, all kinds of tornadoes controlled per day, in addition to the same thousands of calibers, expanders, and not like near Kharkov last autumn.

[rotmistr60]

The next six months will be decisive in the conflict in Ukraine

But he did not specify for whom and how. Or did he really mean the United States and their decision on Ukraine and the possible direct participation of one of the NATO countries (under its own flag) in the conflict, depending on the situation at the front.

[Crete 25]

And so every six months. No one is tired of any agenda in the West, they still just get a taste

[Prisoner]

"According to Gazis, Burns also stated that Washington does not consider Moscow to be serious about the negotiation process ..." (c) Read - Moscow will not be able to be diluted into new negotiations in order to buy time for new preparations for the continuation of the fighting. What are these bastards counting on after the revelations of the German toad and the French ferret?

[AAC]

More unsubstantiated statements. They have enough money. The goals set for the destruction of the European economy are being fulfilled. Another couple of years, global discord in the EU, disconnection from cheap energy resources from Russia. And so the US economy went up. The EU (former countries mean) sells cheap (but little), buys high (and most importantly a lot). Classics of the genre.

Everyone says that a short victorious war is needed to reset the economy. But these went further. They staged a fairly powerful conflict, did not win (wangyu, but most likely it will be so) and benefited. And it will be like in 1945 again. We won, and they won. Do not be surprised if the EU will be involved in full. And some pasta will go crazy and be made a scapegoat. Although liverwurst is an excellent candidate. Even an ally being wealthy and prone to independence is seen as a threat to Americans. And exports are growing. And this is primarily cars. Can you imagine how much money that is? I just took this on a whim. In America, the auto market is very important. Entire cities are built around factories. Inside the US, the biggest problem is unemployment. The unemployed will not go to war (and this is not profitable), but to use them in production for the vacant niche at home and abroad is a force. A lot of problems are solved right away: unemployment, crime, mortgages, goals in life, the American dream. And all you need to inflate the conflict between the EU and Russia. And yet "not a single American was hurt." The Russians gouged the Germans with their cars. The French with their planes. Everything and business then. And you won't write. These are all Russians, all claims against them. "Aggressor country".

It seems to me that it is extremely important to make sure that the United States is raked to the fullest. To fall apart into all their states, and each state fell apart a couple more times. What if they rode horses there and collected oil in buckets and sold it to the Mexicans in exchange for bread. What would a pack of cigarettes cost 2 billion dollars, and boots 10. That's who needs to be driven into the Middle Ages.

[blackGRAIL]

That's right, but the problem is with the last paragraph. It is definitely necessary to do this. And not only with the United States - the main ideologist of support for Ukraine is England. There is no other such country, such a follower and opposing Russia for such a long time. It's just not possible to implement it. But if it is impossible to achieve disintegration, this does not mean that it is necessary to weaken.

[alexander 66]

Unfortunately, there is some truth in his words, no matter how much we would like to. They are preparing a very serious blow, count the number of shock equipment that the dills will receive, plus superiority in communications, intelligence, the Ukrainians have plus agents on the ground, the number of people. . Now count 300 mobilized
Taking into account the departed, the wounded, the refuseniks, whose contract has ended, the protection of the territory, enough for the offensive? And in the end, is there any equipment, will they have time to prepare it? If the dill offensive is successful, will anyone calculate all the consequences? Remember the results of the Crimean War, there was no loss of land, and the results were deplorable. And if country 404 remains, then for Russia it will be like death, it will be a knife to the throat. You won't leave her alone.

[Fangaro]

CIA director: The next six months will be decisive in the conflict in Ukraine

The next six months will be another decisive one in the conflict...

I do not believe that these are the real thoughts of the enemy. Especially at this level.
Yes, the Director of the CIA is no longer an intelligence agent (or rather, not a spy), but an administrator and politician. So even more so ... Whatever the politician has on his tongue, he will never do.