In the British Air Force: Britain could transfer fighter jets to Ukraine, but after the withdrawal of Russian troops from its territory

The original interpretation of the possibility of transferring fighter jets to the troops of the Kyiv regime was born in Britain. This interpretation is described by The Telegraph.

The material of the British press says that official London can send combat aircraft to Ukraine, but under one condition. This condition consists in the "withdrawal of Russian troops from the territory of Ukraine."

The publication, citing a high-ranking official (commander) in the United Kingdom Air Force, writes that they do not exclude the possibility of transferring British-made aircraft to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

From the article:

However, so far such deliveries are not among the priorities.

It was noted that Britain could hand over the planes to Kyiv “after the Russian troops leave Ukraine”:

This can be done to ensure that Ukraine defends its borders with the help of British combat aircraft.

Recall that other countries, including the United States, are also considering the possible transfer of fighter jets to Ukraine. They are considering the possibility of supplying the Kyiv regime with F-16 fighter jets. At the same time, the question is again not only in the training of pilots, but also in the organization of the service system and from which airfields these American-made fighters will take off.

Comments

[voice of reason]

They no longer know what to put in order to save the former Ukraine from a military catastrophe. And, since the current Western politicians are people who do not have combat experience and came into politics according to gender and racial quotas, their level of competence in military matters is extremely low. They really crammed like starlings "the importance of the LGBTQ + - agenda" "cis-genderism and racial freedom from colonial classical music and mathematics" and then the war. It is necessary about tanks and planes, about performance characteristics and tactics of action. But they can’t talk about it, they can talk about toilets and changing rooms for transgender people, they built their election programs on this. So they bring a blizzard, open the "overton windows". They pushed through the tanks and they will push through the planes. Only, unlike Churchill, Stalin, de Gaulle, and the same Hitler, they did not fight, and, unlike Reagan, they did not serve in the army either. Well, they think that the pieces of iron themselves can provide something like the allocation of money. And in the world, not everything is measured by money and speculative financial capital.

[nickname7]

current Western politicians are people with no combat experience

You are just mistaken, Anglo-American politicians are the highest class, and compared to those who have been deceived for 8 years, they are simply titans. Their defense ministers are pros, not cardboard marshals.
There is another redistribution of the world, and while the Anglo-Saxon elites have calculated everything correctly, they have the best results. It’s sickening to write about the Russian elite, they lost 300 yards and continue to drive resources by entering into agreements with partners.

[Repellent]

Quote: nickname7

Their defense ministers are pros

Are you talking about gynecologists? Nu-nu...

Friday went well, it seems. This, in the morning, but on serious soups - quite pulls the diagnosis

[Petr_Koldunov]

Quote: nickname7

Their defense ministers are pros, not cardboard marshals.

I'm embarrassed to ask - who are you talking about? Austin? Mark Milli? Ben Hodges? Multi-star generals and ministers who are talking such nonsense that their ears are wrapped - are they pros ??? Yes, they are not really not cardboard, because everyone is somehow with combat experience ... but that does not make these half-wits wise or competent military leaders!
The last more or less sane military leader in the United States was Robert Gates. He was simply forced to lead the aggressive line of the American military, because such a party line ... but he was always against all these conflicts, for an early exit from Iraq, for an early exit from Afghanistan, against confrontation with the Russians ...

And about the European ministers and commanders - even mentioning it is ridiculous!

[Machiavelli]

It’s a no brainer that they don’t want such anti-advertising that the Ukrainians made by bayaktara.

[Stella Haddad]

Quote: Machiavelli

It’s a no brainer that they don’t want such anti-advertising that the Ukrainians made by bayaktara.

Bayraktars are still being bought, and by new countries. I understand that for 3 years you have not been able to calm down because of the disgraced Libyans and Armenians?

[Carat]

Recall that other countries, including the United States, are also considering the possible transfer of fighter jets to Ukraine. They are considering the possibility of supplying the Kyiv regime with F-16 fighter jets. At the same time, the question is again not only in the training of pilots, but also in the organization of the service system and from which airfields these American-made fighters will take off.

Reputational losses are also taken into account. After all, Russia has the best air defense system, which means that they will be regularly "landed" in Ukraine, which cannot but affect sales.

[rotmistr60]

the condition is "the withdrawal of Russian troops from the territory of Ukraine."

It is clear that nothing poses a danger to British aircraft. The position for the Anglo-Saxons is natural - you die as much time as it takes for us, and we will watch from the side without putting ourselves and the reputation of our technology at risk.

[astra wild2]

"Russian troops will leave Ukraine" depending on what is considered Ukraine: Donbass, Kherson region, Crimea - the Russian Federation, but in Kyiv they think differently.

[Amateur]

If Russia NOW leaves Ukraine, then in a week it will be in NATO. Therefore, not only British aircraft, but also American, Polish, Dutch, etc., as well as American, English, etc., will be out. troops with tanks. In general, "nezalezhna" will become the same occupied country as the FRG.

[Sith]

Quote: Carat

Recall that other countries, including the United States, are also considering the possible transfer of fighter jets to Ukraine. They are considering the possibility of supplying the Kyiv regime with F-16 fighter jets. At the same time, the question is again not only in the training of pilots, but also in the organization of the service system and from which airfields these American-made fighters will take off.

Reputational losses are also taken into account. After all, Russia has the best air defense system, which means that they will be regularly "landed" in Ukraine, which cannot but affect sales.

So our air defense is just all built to find planes, cruise missiles, large targets
at a normal distance
Accompany to the right and shoot down
Yes, small drones have changed the rules of such games a little, but small drones are still short-range weapons, and if the drone is long-range, it can no longer be small and already has the dimensions of a small aircraft

[Roma 1977]

I fully support the UK on this issue. As well as the fact that the Russian Federation could transfer its aircraft to Scotland after the withdrawal of British troops from there. In the meantime, ATGMs, MANPADS and MLRS should be supplied to Scotland. And to train Scottish volunteers on the territory of the Russian Federation.

[Kvakosavrus]

Quote: Amateur

If Russia NOW leaves Ukraine, then in a week it will be in NATO.

Undoubtedly so. Therefore, sadly, the only thing that remains is an endless war. While the missiles are flying at objects 404, she cannot enter anywhere.

Well, or the occupation of the entire territory of Ukraine, but it is not clear why we need it.

[Fizik13]

They are afraid of losing their planes - it means they respect them.

[Sasha from Uralmash]

It is necessary to transfer the fighters to Ireland after leaving England!