Russian military correspondent spoke about additional motivation for Russian fighters to destroy NATO tanks in Ukraine

Russian military commander Alexander Sladkov wondered about the special motivation of fighters to destroy enemy equipment. His post on the Telegram channel is primarily about tanks Leopard, Abrams and other NATO-style armored vehicles, the delivery of which is expected by the Kyiv regime.

The question of additional motivation is not an idle one. If the policy today is such that they are not going to destroy trains with heavy equipment supplied to Ukraine from abroad, then it turns out that the entire load will again fall on the shoulders of an ordinary soldier of the Russian army. And this fighter, again - in the absence of decisions on the destruction of NATO equipment when it is imported into Ukrainian territory, sooner or later will have to face the Challengers, the Abrams, and the Leopards already on the battlefield.

Voenkor Sladkov makes a proposal to establish medals for destroyed NATO tanks, for example, the medal "For the destroyed Leopard tank".

Alexander also proposes to determine the title of Hero of Russia for a fighter who took a direct part in the destruction of five tanks manufactured by NATO countries.

Alexander Sladkov on his channel in TG:

And remember that we wanted to pay a reward for the destroyed enemy equipment.

For NATO tanks, he offered to raise such a reward five times.

Recall that the basis of the ruling coalition in Germany - the SPD party - announced that about 80 Leopard 2A6 tanks would be delivered to Ukraine. The Biden administration announced the delivery of 31 Abrams tanks. Britain will supply a company (up to 14) of Challenger tanks. Finns, Canadians, French, Poles and other sponsors of the armed conflict in Ukraine are planning to supply several more NATO-style tanks.

Comments

[Chip4ik]

The last thing a fighter thinks about is the reward for the destroyed equipment and it is necessary to motivate not with words, but with deeds. And then only words about decision-making centers.

[Argon]

And if you burn these tanks to the front line, how motivates the fighters should be said. Other goals and objectives need to be addressed, and not wait for NATO tanks

[Silver99]

maybe it's time to use "bassoons" and "cornets" not only in parades ((((or even better to erase Western Ukraine with its tunnels, bridges and junction stations. Just drawing with red pencils and concern at the UN is a weak weapon.

[Asad]

It looks like VO has become a branch of the TG of the Sladkov channel, dear editors, you can read the articles of this author on his channel. Better take care of the bell.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: ASAD

It looks like VO has become a branch of the TG of the Sladkov channel, dear editors, you can read the articles of this author on his channel.

that's for sure, only in the morning I already read the 3rd article from him. And not about the situation, but all some kind of own "inferences", in the style of the "general of latrines" from Schweik

[Nikolay310]

you're right. the sane goals of the SVO were not announced even 11 months after the start ... in addition, a number of events, as it were, directly hint at the question "is it necessary" ...

another thing is that the respected "Western partners" of Vladimir Vladimirovich do not accept his "gestures of good will" ...

[Mavrikiy]

Voenkor Sladkov makes a proposal to establish medals for destroyed NATO tanks, for example, medal "For the destroyed tank" Leopard ".

Insanity was strong ... There were signs in the Wehrmacht, for example, "Participant in an assault attack", similar ones were in the USA .... A couple and we should introduce the signs "Participant in battles with NATO forces" while the papers speculate, discuss, perpetuate their contribution ... we will be late already. And now it will be handed over to all participants in the battles on the Ruin.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote from Chip4ik

The last thing a fighter thinks about is a reward for destroyed equipment

The payment of monetary rewards and the presentation of special signs (except for medals and orders) indicating certain merits of a soldier is a long-standing practice in the armies! Evidence of this can be "dug up" from ancient times and the Middle Ages! They began to put this tradition on the "stream" in WW1 and it received development in WW2! They handed out badges (stripes) for participating in hand-to-hand (hand-to-hand) combat ... for a tank knocked out in a "close" battle ... for defense or taking "significant "cities, etc. etc. ! So ... what is there to invent? Everything has been thought of for us!
PS Maybe introduce signs on VO? For example. "For 100+"..."For 1000+"or "For 5000+"..."For "experiencing" 3 moderators"! And the benefits ... do not forget the benefits! For example, an extraordinary removal of a penalty or a "severe warning" instead of a ban!

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Nikolaevich I

Maybe introduce signs on VO?

I offer supplements , to the rank and file 10 warnings before the ban, officers 15, generals 20! Or there for every year on the forum + 1 warning before the ban. So to speak for the length of service Or else, as a reward, give non-deleted messages - write whatever you want in them, within the UK

[Maz]

Sladkov is right, there certainly won’t be any extra material reward, the question is about the crews of helicopters and tanks, sho, divided equally among the crew members? Sirens roar again, Dneprupetrovsk is lucky yesterday and today, sort of like an answer to Leopards with Abramsons

[SlavichK1]

Correctly. It is necessary to give the damaged equipment to those who knocked it out. Including Abrams etc.

[Briz]

The last thing a fighter thinks about is the reward for the destroyed equipment and it is necessary to motivate not with words, but with deeds.

This is so during the battle, but after the battle (if you survived), then you even think about the reward.

[nov_tech.vrn]

FORES (the city of Asbest) will pay 5 million rubles to Russian servicemen for the destruction or capture of a foreign Abrams/Leopard tank in the zone of a special military operation in Ukraine.

“The decision to transfer Western tanks to Kyiv indicates that NATO has abandoned the concept of supplying only defensive weapons to Ukraine, which means the need to consolidate and support our army. We have been doing this since the first days of the special military operation and will continue to support our servicemen in the future,” FORES said.

[Cananecat]

Nothing will motivate you to burn Leopards as much as the memory of your ancestors...

[Nikolay310]

Well, what is the memory of the ancestors ???

through the efforts of the state, all this memory of ancestors has been so discredited in recent years ... what is the memory? get out of the tank and run away with a Nazi almost to kiss, as in one famous film with a certain Petrov (who is not a friend of Boshirov) ...

By the way, I propose to put Medinsky in front of the company or battalion of the RF Armed Forces, to which these tanks will go, and let him raise the fighters with squeals "for a rye bun and a tram" well, or "for himself and for Sasha" ... maybe even then this Mannerheim lover something will clear up

[Mazunga]

Medina no way again the Holocaust will turn out, again, the boy has an extra chromosome, why kill a little belly

[single-n]

You also forgot about attacks with shovels and about the fact that "fighters are fighting for Katya."
Mikhalkov, too, would not hurt to send there. Let him show how the miracle of spiders and charmed mines help in the war. At the same time, he will admire the German tanks under sail.

[private person]

Nothing is more motivating

The motivation is to survive. If you don't destroy it, it will destroy you. And as for memory, have you looked at the history textbook of a modern student for a long time? There, 1-2 pages are written about the Second World War, even about the history of Ancient Rome, and even more.

[Alexander Ivanov_11]

Like in the Soviet cartoon about the gorgon jellyfish - "I missed such a statue on my island"

[Alexander Ivanov_11]

I meant that such a tank as a trophy was not enough for us in the most expensive museum of the World in Kubinka ...

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Alexander Ivanov_11

I meant that such a tank as a trophy was not enough for us in the most expensive museum of the World in Kubinka ...

At the end of the SVO in Kubinka, the entire range of NATO equipment, which they drove to Banderlog, will be put on public display. Not the first time, grandfathers beat and grandchildren will split.

[Tim]

Old anecdote

[/ quote] Somehow I caught a Georgian goldfish and says: I want to become a Hero of the Soviet Union! The fish and the horseradish said no question, a Georgian is standing with a grenade and a German tank "Tiger" is rushing at him. [quote]

[Borschevyk]

If they lie to you, but you do not believe
So you're being entertained

[isv000]

If the policy today is such that they are not going to destroy trains with heavy equipment supplied to Ukraine from abroad, then it turns out that the entire burden will again fall on the shoulders of an ordinary soldier of the Russian army.

It turns out that the Kremlin is making a gesheft and the whole burden of the war, with their knowledge, falls on the shoulders of the soldiers and their heroism. So it turns out that if we allow weapons to be transported directly to the positions ...

[Epaulettes]

Voenkor Sladkov makes a proposal to establish medals for destroyed NATO tanks, for example, the medal "For the destroyed Leopard tank".

And what to do with this medal?
And why is it impossible to reward with an amount equivalent to the cost of the destroyed equipment? I think that with this approach, they will quickly make a decision at the top so that this equipment simply does not reach our fighters.

[Voenoboz]

Klasna approach and most importantly do it. Any branch of the military will be able to participate in financial matters.

[72jora72]

And why is it impossible to reward with an amount equivalent to the cost of the destroyed equipment?

At this time, the rates are as follows: the amount of incentives for the destruction of Ukrainian equipment:
Aircraft - 300 thousand rubles.
Helicopter - 200 thousand rubles.
Tank - 100 thousand rubles.
Drone - 50 thousand rubles.
An armored personnel carrier, a self-propelled artillery mount, the S-300, Buk, Tor systems or an RZSO combat vehicle - 50 thousand rubles each.

[Briz]

S-300, Buk, Tor systems or RZSO combat vehicle - 50 thousand rubles each.

They obviously didn’t fork out much for air defense equipment, whoever came up with this would need to be bombed.

[Starover_Z]

Quote: Shoulder straps

And why is it impossible to reward with an amount equivalent to the cost of the destroyed equipment?

From the salaries of office colonels and generals from Frunzenskaya, from the Moscow Region!

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Shoulder straps

And why is it impossible to reward with an amount equivalent to the cost of the destroyed equipment? I think that with this approach, they will quickly make a decision at the top so that this equipment simply does not reach our fighters.

Lieutenant, it's time for you to wear the epaulettes of a marshal. You think not only globally, but also approach the problem in an original way, with a ready-made solution.

[dmi.pris1]

I propose to remove state awards from the stained beau monde (these are not even artists, but snickering would be dl o). And reward those who distinguished themselves on the battlefield .. And lately, the undeserved have often been awarded.

[rocket757]

Russian military commander Alexander Sladkov wondered about the special motivation of fighters to destroy enemy equipment. His post on the Telegram channel is primarily about Leopard, Abrams and other NATO-style armored vehicles, the deliveries of which are expected by the Kyiv regime.

Something special to highlight! Is it necessary?
In war, everything is important, nothing can be left without attention and a correct assessment.

[Mountain shooter]

When our fighters shot down German planes during the Second World War, the monetary reward was the last thing they thought about. Although the money was clear. Do we even have payments for enemy equipment now?

[Woodman]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Do we even have payments for enemy equipment now?

For the destroyed aircraft - 300 thousand rubles;
▪️ For a destroyed helicopter - 200 thousand rubles;
▪️For the destroyed UAV - 50 thousand rubles;
▪️For a destroyed tank - 100 thousand rubles;
▪️For the destruction of infantry fighting vehicles, infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, MTLB, self-propelled guns, S-300, Buk, Tor, Osa, MLRS combat vehicle - 50 thousand rubles.

[Bulrumeb]

The question of additional motivation is not an idle one. If the policy today is such that they are not going to destroy trains with heavy equipment supplied to Ukraine from abroad, then it turns out that the entire load will again fall on the shoulders of an ordinary soldier of the Russian army.

Some kind of sur, you can’t say otherwise.

[Arkady007]

There is an interesting grain in my thoughts.
The whole world sponsors materially distinguished military men. What to do other times have come, other people have grown up and we have too.
Maybe someone wants to buy a new car and, for the sake of sporting interest, will fill up the Leopard.

[Cartalon]

In the Second World War, they quite rewarded themselves for the destroyed equipment, although it seems like the times were different.

[Nikolay310]

donrf
Dress those who like to fight with their tongues in iron helmets, give out mosquitoes and throw them on the front. They will definitely stop

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Nikolay310

Dress those who like to fight with their tongues in iron helmets, give out mosquitoes and throw them on the front. They will definitely stop

they have more important things to do, to fight the Internet with tspsishniks! And on the front line, let the mobilized stomp

[-Dmitry-]

Dress those who like to fight with their tongues in iron helmets, give out mosquitoes and throw them on the front. They will definitely stop

I see that we need you first of all :) And as for Sladkov, he is already there.

[Epaulettes]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

I propose to remove state awards from the stained beau monde

First of all, state awards must be removed from the Minister of Defense and the National Guard. Preferably, along with shoulder straps.

[your1970]

Quote: Shoulder straps

First of all, state awards must be removed from the Minister of Defense and the National Guard. Preferably, along with shoulder straps.

Then with Zhukov - how NGSH- by August 1941, it was necessary not only to remove shoulder straps with awards. He had 10 total losses near Minsk in the first 200 days. Well, Minsk for the company ....
Or "this is different"?!!!!!

[rotmistr60]

it turns out that the entire load will again fall on the shoulders of an ordinary soldier of the Russian army.

It is time for the planners of carrying out the NMD, striking the Ukrainian infrastructure, to think about how not to overload the shoulders of the Russian soldier, who already have difficult battles on the ground and the task of liberating the territories. To be honest, I still don’t understand and probably won’t be able to understand why we allow the bulk of Western equipment to get to LBS? Isn't it clear that every tank, every installation is an additional loss of our fighters.

[Uncle lee]

Quote: rotmistr60

I can’t understand why we allow the bulk of Western equipment to get to LBS?

This question haunts many! In addition to the General Staff and the Moscow Region, probably!

[Grandfather]

Voenkor Sladkov makes a proposal to establish medals for destroyed NATO tanks, for example, the medal "For the destroyed Leopard tank".

completely out of his mind survived sweet?

For NATO tanks, he offered to raise such a reward five times.

Have you spied on a bloomer or what? wow "motivation" ... pure capitalism, survived. yes, burn the "cat" of the fighters, and so in the blood, at the subconscious level, historical memory. I'm sure German tanks on this earth should burn with torches.

[single-n]

Yeah. I’m sitting like this in a trench, the tank is naughty for me, and all of this is in thought. Burn it or not. He is not a blasphemous "leopard", but quite an Orthodox t-72 from Morroco. Don't let him live. I'll go look for "leopard". I'm just motivated by it.
Is the uncle of the correspondent with cuckoo all right? Yes, I don’t care what threatens me there. What more motivation. Either I will burn this crap or she will wind the harp beckoning.
Something all these dances look like a banal cut of a bobble.
And about stimulating, and preferably throughout the body using various means, those who will admit that these tanks will reach the front. Lovers of red lines and kind gestures.

[your1970]

Quote: Single-n

Yes, I don’t care what threatens me there. What more motivation. Either I will burn this crap or she will wind the harp beckoning.
Something all these dances look like a banal cut of a bobble.

When in the Second World War they paid money in spacecraft for a destroyed aircraft / tank / ship, was it also a cut of the dough ???!!! judging by your logic, the soldiers of the Red Army did not need motivation .... And the Kremlin took and introduced motivation .. ..
Did they cut the loot?? es??

[single-n]

And there were separate medals and awards for a downed "tiger" or a burned "thing". Even now they pay for the destruction of equipment. On which vegetable should I introduce SEPARATE rewards / payments for "leopards"? My grandfather received a medal for taking 3 prisoners. I didn’t see any gradations in the order like “1 German = 1,5 Hungarian = 2,5 Romanian = 1,2567 Vlasov. If the prisoner weighs less than 80 kg, then a reduction factor of 0,9 is applied. If the prisoner does not have a badge for excellent shooting, a reduction factor of 0,7 is applied. With simultaneous use, the smallest coefficient is used "And such my grandfather walks along the battlefield with a similar order and looks. This one is too small, that one is illiterate, and this one is generally Belgian. He is not in the statement, and therefore they will not pay, let him run further.
And the very proposal to SPECIALLY allocate these tanks sends all the attempts of the rest of the propaganda to the vegetable that these machines are nothing special. If SPECIAL rewards are introduced for them, then they are ESPECIALLY dangerous? Are we scaring our own troops? If the military commander does not think about such things, then he has something with logic.

[Dock1272]

So Yes. In blood. BUT .. while the soldier (mobilized) is fighting, who will support his family? Who will support her if he dies? I don’t think that our state will pay a pension equal to the salary of a good engineer or other specialist (a good specialist now earns from 40K-50K and above, and sometimes up to a hundred + .. yes, not always and not everywhere, but. .., the pension is definitely lower by several times, if not by an order of magnitude). And so, at least some money will remain, at least for the first time. And by the way, during the Second World War, despite the difficult situation in the country, the military was regularly paid "prize" for downed enemy aircraft, wrecked tanks and guns, sunk ships. And the commanders of the units did not "clamp" them and did not demand kickbacks from the amounts received (although, maybe where it was, but, I think, isolated cases ...)

[Ivan Ivanov]

This question haunts many! In addition to the General Staff and the Moscow Region, probably!

This is a political decision, questions to the Kremlin. It is hard to imagine that the idea of ​​not touching the delivery routes is being lobbied in the General Staff. Well, only if someone pushes them from the outside.

[evgen81]

Yes, everything is clear. This is done to please their partners, who want the Russians to be killed. Otherwise, the partners will not like it if their brand new equipment is destroyed before they have time to kill anyone.

[Grandfather Mozai]

There is a suspicion that the brightest brains are powdered by his own environment, they say everything is ok, the losses are minimal, lopards pfff, junk is being passed, the red lines are safe and sound.

[APASUS]

You just need to have enough ATGM systems at the front, starting from Fagot and ending with Shtkrm-S

[Dismas]

And behind enemy lines - DRG with a sufficient amount of explosives. If it is already difficult to destroy bridges and tunnels remotely, then you can try a point "rail war".

[Simple]

Loitering ammunition with a tandem warhead.

[Rodimtsev]

He got old, he began to talk nonsense for a long time

[glock-17]

The refusal to destroy tanks before they appear at the front indicates either the complete impotence of the Russian army, or another gesture of goodwill in order not to offend partners. Is it really necessary to stop the offensive of tanks by 28 Panfilov's men again?

[Ivan Ivanov]

Yes, we are playing a game imposed on us, no activity is visible to exit the scenario, the trouble is when / if impotence is in power.

[tone]

According to open sources, only 750 Kornets were produced in Russia. Bassoons from the times of the USSR are long outdated and are unlikely to fit into the fight against modern NATO tanks.
How will our mobilized ones repel tank fists?!
Did this warrat even think with his head?

[glock-17]

I wonder if sub-caliber shells with uranium cores will help?

[Kurganets-45]

Of course, you will excuse me, but judging the number of weapons from open sources is fortune-telling on coffee grounds.

[Svetlana]

Soviet film "The Ballad of a Soldier", directed by Grigory Chukhrai in 1959. In 1961, the film received the British Academy of Motion Picture Arts awards in the Best Film nominations, and Vladimir Ivashov - as the best foreign actor. In addition, he was nominated for an Oscar, won the prize for best film for young people at the Cannes Film Festival.
...
This is a hint. And the bottom line is that the story of the film begins as a fighter fighting German tanks and for the destruction of which he receives a REWARD, namely a vacation home to his mother.
A Sladkov proposed to think about a reward for the same, lined German tanks, today, in the modern world.

The military correspondent voices and raises those questions that you can and should think about. Here is his message in full:

Out of 9 thousand FOR, only a hundred AGAINST.

[Simple]

What is more profitable for the state - to pay compensation to the close relatives of the dead, to support a disabled person, and to those who nevertheless destroyed the enemy’s equipment to give awards and even bonuses. Or, nevertheless, military equipment should be knocked out before it enters the battle?

[Dock1272]

This is not shown in the film, because in those days it was inappropriate. BUT .. during the Second World War, they paid a cash reward for each knocked out enemy tank (500-1000 rubles) or evacuated one (3000-5000 rubles, for repairs a separate bonus went to repairmen 350-500 rubles), or a downed aircraft (1000 rubles-fighter, 2000 -bomber) sunken ship (up to 10000 rubles). All this in addition to the salaries / allowances. Considering that the average salary of a worker was approx. 600r, engineer approx.1200r. Then payments for the tank from 500 to 1000 rubles. were a hefty bonus. True, there are cases (not often, BUT ... when chief finance officers or unit commanders embezzled this money, and kickbacks were not invented by our officials. It has always been: to whom is the war, and to whom is the mother dear. Scum has been at all times. Another thing is that they were punished for that then, but now you can pay off))) Yes, and inflation, and the cost of products on the black market (prices in state-owned stores are an order of magnitude lower, but normalized, by cards) this bonus was practically depreciated, but still there was "a little" better than "nothing at all".

[Maks1995]

Bolt again....
Money? Erectorate (politely)? Who will give it?
unreal.
A medal, yes, they can. By the way, they seem to be in general put ..

PS. They will immediately advertise, as in South Ossetia, that these are the highest officers (and officials of the edra) personally knocked out all the leopards ....

[Yumico]

In my opinion, the "decision-making center" is not located in Kyiv!

[Million]

Do I understand correctly that the tanks will be delivered to Ukraine by rail, which cannot be bombed, otherwise our oligarchs will lose some money?

[Simple]

In 1940, in Narvik, in (then) neutral Norway, English and German ships were loaded side by side with iron ore. True, such a stacus-quo did not last long.
What happens with the so-called "SVO" in Ukraine cannot be called anything other than complete trash.

Sometimes I ask myself: the destruction of the Slavs - whose goal is this?

[Dock1272]

It turns out like this. These are "fraternal railways"))) and soldiers, like "they are still giving birth" ... But the trouble is, now women do not want to "still give birth" ... I don’t understand at all. How long will the people "bodies" provide for the economic "interests" of certain groups of the population? Too many unknowns lately. No, I understand that we, the population, cannot disclose everything, secrecy, etc. but to explain, at least, why and what should. Otherwise, fair doubts arise ...

[megadeth]

Russian military commander Alexander Sladkov wondered about the special motivation of fighters to destroy enemy equipment

Motivator ...., military correspondents YOU WOULD BETTER HAVE UP in the media so that this technique does not reach the line of contact, they listen to you at least a little, a little.

[Dismas]

Citizen Sladkov has such a bad opinion about Soviet military equipment, compared to NATO, that he considers the destruction of the 72nd an easy task, in comparison with the "cat", etc.? Journalists, evil, because their villainy is from stupidity.

[Romanenko]

Quote: "Voenkor Sladkov makes a proposal to establish medals for destroyed NATO tanks, for example, the medal "For the destroyed Leopard tank"
I don’t know, Sladkov, of course, knows better there on the front end who will warm his soul more.
Personally, this didn’t seem to me to be something stimulating, maybe I’m wrong, but it looks like Filatov’s - “the blacksmiths were given a task - they’ll make an order by tomorrow ...”, and why, in fact, the Polish T-72, or the Svinoryl T-64 is worse than the German fascist Leoperd, or amerofascist Abrashka?
Probably there will be enough motivation there anyway, the main thing is that fewer of these same tanks get to the front end, let them work better on art and videoconferencing on the way.

[Kusja]

After Sladkov’s conclusions, it’s not easy to motivate myself, I’m not going to anyway ...

[perun1988]

Have the fighters already been trained to fight Western tanks, have units and formations been saturated with modern means of fighting them, and have they gained air supremacy? Okay, what am I talking about.

[Uncle lee]

Quote from: perun1988

Okay, what am I talking about.

The echelons with Leo and Abrash were destroyed on the way to the front! Bassoons and Cornets rest, fighters without medals ....

[Sibiryak70region]

Sweet ordinary balabol. His words that our fighters have mosquitoes and iron helmets are wonderful and succession of generations. It is necessary to equip him like that and to the front line

[VladMirU]

Quote: Uncle Lee

Quote: rotmistr60

I can’t understand why we allow the bulk of Western equipment to get to LBS?

This question haunts many! In addition to the General Staff and the Moscow Region, probably!

I forgot one more "structure" ......

[VladMirU]

Quote: Rodimtsev

He got old, he began to talk nonsense for a long time

What to take from him - a former political worker ...

[VladMirU]

Quote: IvanIvanov

Yes, we are playing a game imposed on us, no activity is visible to exit the scenario, the trouble is when / if impotence is in power.

Yes, there is some kind of agreement. Either the “rulers” have a general idea about fulfilling the plan for the “golden billion”, or, by dragging out the war, earn a lot of money in the production of weapons (we are not talking about budgets, but personal “pockets” ). Something is in the air, elusive. But it's very gross.

[_simply]

Not delivering a (long-awaited) blow to the echelons with equipment this time will be perceived as a betrayal. Although, European self-propelled guns ride - and nothing. But, tanks are still not art. Take a look at the quantity. At least not everyone should get to the front.

[for]

When meeting with the enemy, one motivation is to get out of the battle a living winner, and the reward is how it will turn out.
And maybe it’s better that the fighters will be left without awards and the equipment will be destroyed during transfer or transportation.

[Oleg Apushkin]

Insanity grew stronger, the eternal political instructor, the lieutenant began to generate thoughts, just like ensign Zadov

[garik77]

You can declare a hunting season and create special groups of rangers to hunt Western tanks. A wrecked tank - a million rubles, a captured one - two or three. And, of course, medals.

[Rusfaner]

In the Urals, here, they have already responded to the offer:
https://newdaynews.ru/ekaterinburg/785011.html
Ural industrialists announced a reward for the destruction of "Leopards" and "Abrams"

"Ural industrialists announced a reward for the destruction of Leopards, Abrams and F15"
Russian servicemen who destroy or capture a German Leopard2 battle tank or an American Abrams will receive a cash reward from the FORES company. It will pay 5 million rubles for the first destroyed or captured tank, and 500 thousand rubles for each subsequent one. Also, for the first downed F-15 and F-16, the reward will be 15 million rubles.

"We are witnessing a process of permanent escalation of the conflict and unlimited pumping of weapons to the enemy. The decision to transfer Western tanks to Kyiv indicates that NATO does not adhere to the concept of supplying Ukraine with only defensive weapons, which means the need to consolidate and support our army. We have been doing this since the first days of the special military operation and will continue to support our military personnel in the future," the company announced. "(c)

[AG-76]

When the situation is "you or you", then the person thinks not about reward or reward, but about how to survive

[Klausp]

Sladkov, despite all the merits, sank below the plinth. What the hell is a medal for a downed tank? This is even worse than "For the capture of Soledar"! What the hell is a take, when was it a release? Here is the problem with motivation! We need ideology and understanding: with whom and for what we are fighting!

[Klausp]

Quote: Rusfaner

In the Urals, here, they have already responded to the offer:
https://newdaynews.ru/ekaterinburg/785011.html
Ural industrialists announced a reward for the destruction of "Leopards" and "Abrams"

"Ural industrialists announced a reward for the destruction of Leopards, Abrams and F15"
Russian servicemen who destroy or capture a German Leopard2 battle tank or an American Abrams will receive a cash reward from the FORES company. It will pay 5 million rubles for the first destroyed or captured tank, and 500 thousand rubles for each subsequent one. Also, for the first downed F-15 and F-16, the reward will be 15 million rubles.

"We are witnessing a process of permanent escalation of the conflict and unlimited pumping of weapons to the enemy. The decision to transfer Western tanks to Kyiv indicates that NATO does not adhere to the concept of supplying Ukraine with only defensive weapons, which means the need to consolidate and support our army. We have been doing this since the first days of the special military operation and will continue to support our military personnel in the future," the company announced. "(c)

that is, there will be no reward, enemy tanks will not burn?

[Ezekiel 25-17]

There is no need to invent anything: for you, and ... Comrade Stalin came up with everything, read the order on cash bonuses for destroyed enemy equipment.