"There will be no new Minsk-3": Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba announced Ukraine's refusal to sign a peace agreement with Russia

There will be no new peace treaty similar to the Minsk agreements, Ukraine does not want to sign any agreements with Russia. This was stated in an interview with Politico by the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry Dmitry Kuleba.

Kyiv does not intend to conclude any agreements on the settlement of the conflict, like those that were signed in 2014 and 2015 with the mediation of Germany and France. According to Kuleba, the new "Minsk-3" will not lead to a settlement of the conflict, but, on the contrary, will lead to even more bloody results, as happened with the Minsk agreements. Therefore, the statements of some Western politicians about the need to make concessions to Russia in order to end the conflict by Ukraine will not be accepted. Let the West seek concessions from Russia.

The mistakes of the Minsk process should not be repeated. In fact, they should serve as an example of how not to negotiate with Russia (...) Any hypothetical "Minsk-3" will have only one result - an even more bloody war

- said the Ukrainian minister.

In fact, Kuleba, in his article for the American edition, tried to shift all the blame for the war in Donbass to Russia. That is, according to him, for all eight years it was Russia, allegedly hiding behind the "Minsk agreements", that waged a bloody war against "peaceful" Ukraine, which is trying to build "democracy" throughout the country, including the eastern regions.

However, as Merkel and Hollande have already admitted, the agreements signed in Minsk in 2014 and 2015 were not a peace treaty, but an attempt to give Ukraine time to prepare for war against Russia. And the West succeeded, in eight years Ukraine was turned into a battering ram, with the help of which it was planned to defeat Moscow. It is premature to talk about the end of the conflict, the US and NATO will fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, while the Western puppet Zelensky and his entourage line their pockets.

Comments

[Plate]

One boasts how cleverly Ukraine deceived Russia with these Minsk agreements. Another says that the mistake will not be repeated. What do they have going on there? One has diarrhea of ​​confessions, the other ... oh, fie on them, I don’t even want to pay attention to this idiocy.

[KAV]

Kuleba has a typo. This is how it would be correct:

The mistakes of the Minsk process should not be repeated. In fact, they should serve as an example of how not to negotiate with Ukraine (...) Any hypothetical "Minsk-3" will have only one result - an even more bloody war

Everything else is absolutely correct!

[Myths]

More precisely, you can't say:

The mistakes of the Minsk process should not be repeated. In fact, they should serve as an example of how not to negotiate. 

Enough for us of such guarantors of "peace" that have created so much bloodshed and ruined destinies.

[private person]

According to Kuleba, the new "Minsk-3" will not lead to a settlement of the conflict

Minsk-3 is primarily beneficial for the Krajina itself as a way to understaff and further arm the Armed Forces, but for Russia this is a shame.

[Egeny]

There will be no new peace treaty similar to the Minsk agreements,

Of course it won't, don't worry, Kulebyaka, although with difficulty, we learn from our mistakes.
Denazification and demilitarization of the entire outskirts.

[Skeptic3]

Are you still unwilling to understand reality? The tanks are already being transferred. By the summer, military aviation will catch up. It smacks of the demilitarization of the RF Armed Forces. Don't find?

[Shiden]

I wanted to give you a plus, but I haven’t been on the site for a long time. And so everything is right you are under a snowstorm.

[former soldier]

........ under snowstorms.

What other blizzards?

[topol717]

Quote: Skeptik3

Are you still unwilling to understand reality? The tanks are already being transferred. By the summer, military aviation will catch up. It smacks of the demilitarization of the RF Armed Forces. Don't find?

We do not find. Or do you think these tanks do not burn? or Combat aviation is able to evade air defense and air-to-air missiles ??? Or do you really think that 2 million Ukrainians and 300 infantry fighting vehicles and 30 tanks will save the front? In extreme cases, I emphasize in the EXTREME case, Russia will be able to easily call up 5 million and even 15 million soldiers, and then stop somewhere near the Atlantic, and it’s not a fact that the British Isles will exist by that time.
You don't need to take us on a show. I have said many times that it is impossible to defeat a country that owns nuclear weapons, so the United States is doing everything so that IRAN does not receive nuclear weapons.

[Skeptic3]

You live somewhere in the alternatively gifted world.
Nuclear countries lose wars all the time. This is business as usual.
Russia cannot call for much more than it has already called for. She does not have the resources to accommodate, clothe, feed, arm, train and provide so many people with officers.

[former soldier]

You live somewhere in the alternatively gifted world.
Nuclear countries lose wars all the time. This is business as usual.
Russia cannot call for much more than it has already called for. She does not have the resources to accommodate, clothe, feed, arm, train and provide so many people with officers.

State your specific proposals for Russia, and, well, for Ukraine too. Let's evaluate your alternative giftedness.

[Skeptic3]

My specific proposals to those in power don't care. I see the picture like this:

Ukraine will fight to the end - it has no other options. It is a question of the survival of the state and the nation.
The Russian Federation will fight to the end - its authorities have no other options. They think it's a matter of survival for them. Perhaps they are wrong. And perhaps not.

In such a situation, the course of hostilities will depend only on the amount of Western aid, because. only the West has free resources to maneuver.
Last year, the West set itself the goal of stopping the Russian Federation and waiting for it to come to its senses. It turned out to stop effectively, but the Russian Federation did not change its mind.
This year, judging by the fundamentally different scale of assistance, the West decided to move the front line to the east and see what happens. In the hope that the Russian Federation will come to its senses.

Evaluate)))

[kot711]

Ukraine will fight to the end - it has no other options. It is a question of the survival of the state and the nation.
What kind of nation, Bandera-Petliurists? Nazism must be destroyed, and the Ukrainians are not in danger.

[Skeptic3]

Do you have any substantive arguments? Or just insults?

[former soldier]

Evaluate)))

You did not understand. I did not ask for an assessment of who is right or wrong, who is wrong or vice versa. The criticality of the situation is understood by everyone and for everyone.
I asked to list specifically on the points: 1. 2. 3. ...
What measures do you propose Russia needs to take to resolve the situation. Well, specific measures for Ukraine too.
So we are waiting for you!

[Skeptic3]

Don't wait. In Russia, freedom of speech is prohibited. And you know it.
And you also know what to do.

[topol717]

Quote: Skeptik3

Nuclear countries lose wars all the time.

Show me one example? where and which country lost?

Quote: Skeptik3

Russia cannot call for much more than it has already called for. She does not have the resources to accommodate, clothe, feed, arm, train and provide so many people with officers.

Yeah. a country with a population of 150 million has a minimum of 20-25 million men capable of taking up arms. And you have all unfounded statements.

[Skeptic3]

USSR in Korea, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria.
USA in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Russia in Chechnya.

Having 25 million men is not enough. They need to be fed, clothed, housed, armed, trained and provided with officers.
And also find a replacement for them at their jobs. Otherwise, production will stop and the economy will collapse.

[Stanislav_Shishkin]

Quote: Skeptik3

Nuclear countries lose wars all the time. This is business as usual.

Is this Civilization 7? Cool!

[Osipov9391]

Can you imagine the weapons of those F-16s?
If their regiment, then in a short time they can smash our entire grouping and border airfields.

Rocket AGM-158. Range up to 1000 km. Flies to Moscow at launch over Kyiv. Poles or Finns can give;

JSOW bomb. Many European countries can give. When dropped over Kharkov, it flies to Voronezh;

The Harpoon anti-ship missile is already there. When launched over Odessa, it flies to ships in the roadstead in Sevastopol.

Bombs B61. The Netherlands have warehouses for these aircraft. Doesn't need a comment.

Do you understand what we are talking about? Only a regiment of these fighters is capable of doing incredible misfortunes.
Only Holland alone has more than fifty of them, these are two full-fledged regiments. They can wear everything with time.

[dmi.pris1]

It is possible to defeat a country that owns nuclear weapons. It all depends on the leadership of the country. By the way, the Vietnam War showed this.

[Skeptic3]

And not only she. Recently, a large nuclear country quietly and peacefully withdrew its troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

[topol717]

Quote: Skeptik3

And not only she. Recently, a large nuclear country quietly and peacefully withdrew its troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

So where is the US defeat in Iraq or Afghanistan?

[Skeptic3]

Well, the Russian Federation does not have a defeat in Kherson. There is a "folding and regrouping" of troops.

[former soldier]

And not only she. Recently, a large nuclear country quietly and peacefully withdrew its troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

But that doesn't mean she lost. The US has not lost its sovereignty, does not pay reparations, and has not even changed its foreign or domestic policy. Consider doing a lab/experiment on foreign territory. Yes, we did not get the result we wanted. But this happens in science. By the way, the same thing the USSR wanted to build socialism in Afghanistan. Well, it didn't work out. It happens.

[Skeptic3]

I call the inability to fulfill the combat mission set for myself a military defeat. You may mean something else by this term. No problem.

[topol717]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

It is possible to defeat a country that owns nuclear weapons. It all depends on the leadership of the country. By the way, the Vietnam War showed this.

Yes, there were no winners. But the United States certainly did not lose.

[Skeptic3]

What do you call defeat in the war?
Before using terms, you need to define their meaning.
The failure of the assigned military task is a military defeat, in my understanding.

[barricade]

You forgot the zero, there will be 300 tanks, including Abrams and 2A6

[kpd]

It's a lot? Let me remind you that a year ago, Ukraine had about 2000 tanks in service.

[Skeptic3]

Maybe quality matters too.
How many tanks did the Russian Federation have before the war? And where are they now?

[private person]

that 2 million Ukrainians and 300 infantry fighting vehicles and 30 tanks will save the front?

But only the Germans will supply 30 tanks, as well as the Americans, Britons, etc. And who will put us?

[bk316]

The tanks are already being transferred. By the summer, military aviation will catch up.

So I’m wondering are you sharovarniks and other liberals really that stupid?
The Russian Federation can start (yes, now it’s not a war, but an NVO) and end the war with Ukraine in one hour, completely destroying the structure of state administration, command and control and the logistics structure. Of course, this will be a tough escalation, and Putin WILL NOT DO IT HIMSELF. But you do it under the kicks of the owner. Well, so be it.

[topol717]

Quote from Egeni

Denazification and demilitarization of the entire outskirts.

Correct, there will be no more Ukraine. In addition to the new territories of the Russian Federation, there will be 3-4 states.

[Skeptic3]

You would not trump such fantasies. It harms your reputation.

[Osipov9391]

Can't you see the real things?
It's been a year now, but in fact nothing has been done, and in the coming months the situation may deteriorate sharply for us.

It's time to understand that this "fvse" for Ukraine is being postponed for a year, two, or even more if this "fvse" takes place at all.

[dauria]

Of course it won't, don't worry, Kulebyaka, although with difficulty, we learn from our mistakes.

There is only one mistake - there are no "WE" in Russia. There is a whole horde of rulers, moneybags, ready to agree even now. And they don't care - Minsk, Khasavyurt and so on. If only they would return their cozy little world to them, without sanding them too much for disobedience and bucking. Well, and a small group of officials who simply have no future under such agreements. And no one will give guarantees.
This is the reason for the shame of Russia. The only one. Traders.

[Vladimir80]

What difference does it make what they have, what matters is what we have!

[Terenin]

Quote: Plate

One boasts how cleverly Ukraine deceived Russia with these Minsk agreements. Another says that the mistake will not be repeated.

There have long been no friends with logic. They take informational, accusing Russia pressure day after day, day after day ... like shelling ... only on the psyche

[Oleg812spb]

He was inflated with joy from the news about the supply of "Leopards" ...

[dmi.pris1]

Do not want agreements? Great. You will sign a surrender. Agreements with you and we do not need

[Vashek]

Maybe it’s good that they don’t want negotiations, otherwise I somehow don’t really believe in “goodwill gestures” with ours.

[Gvardeetz77]

Quote from Vashek

Maybe it’s good that they don’t want negotiations, otherwise I somehow don’t really believe in “goodwill gestures” with ours.

So this also confuses ours, it seems that they don’t really want to win ... That’s the situation ...

[SKVichyakow]

Quote: Gvardeetz77

So this also confuses ours, it seems like they don’t really want to win ... That’s the situevina ..

Whether you like it or not, you need to finish what you started.

[sgrabik]

This is true, and we really need to do this more resolutely and as quickly as possible, time is not on our side now.

[Galleon]

How to deal with such intransigence and (as the gentlemen of the liberal Jews liked to express themselves in relation to the Russian nation) such zoological hatred?
With a blow of daggers, the entire military-political leadership of the country of Nazism is eliminated, and the new leadership will certainly be more accommodating.
There is no other way!

[Ivan Fokin_2]

Well said, but there is no need to hope for it, the leadership in Russia is too weak, which is a pity.

[Skeptic3]

What a naive. They've been trying for a year now. And nothing has changed.

[former soldier]

With a blow of daggers, the entire military-political leadership of the country of Nazism is eliminated, and the new leadership will certainly be more accommodating.

The move is good, but most likely they are hiding in the basements. But perhaps there is an undercover agreement - not to touch the tops mutually, under the guarantees of Berlin and Paris. Although looking into the "honest" eyes of Western leaders, and even more so into the sheep's eyes of Ukrainian leaders, one cannot believe in any undercover agreements with them.

[isv000]

No negotiations! We will accept surrender in Uzhgorod!

[Fedor Sokolov]

That's right, there will be no "Minsk-3", we will immediately sign "Kyiv-1" in the presence of the conductor of the orchestra Prigogine right in your office.

[Andrey Moskvin]

The private owner will not be able to sign anything. Are you proposing to fire Lavrov?

[Fedor Sokolov]

And where did I write the word sign? It meant in the presence of the main musician, and of course the diplomats will pee.

[bk316]

The private owner will not be able to sign anything.

How else can. Sending Lavrov is a lot of honor.

[Epaulettes]

The comments are, as usual, very funny.

[Fangaro]

The Minsk agreements were in favor of Ukraine. To prepare your army. Since now Ukraine does not need Minsk-3, it means that they used the time to their advantage.
And we were a little outwitted.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote from Fangaro

The Minsk agreements were in favor of Ukraine. To prepare your army. Since now Ukraine does not need Minsk-3, it means that they used the time to their advantage.
And we were a little outwitted.

First of all, they outwitted themselves. Now, until there is no "stone on stone" left from Ukraine, the mattresses will not peel off from them.
What Kuleba voices is nothing more than their wet dreams on the topic that "they supposedly decide something and supposedly influence something."
The recognition of Merkel and Holland did everything so that there would be no Minsks from the word at all.

[Ulan.1812]

Thank you Lord, you might think we dreamed of negotiations with these clinical freaks.

[Jsem_CZEKO68]

Chudáci mladí Ukrajinci, zapad a Banderovký režim je nutí do nesmyslné války proti Slovanskému bratru. Proč maji vojáci na obou stranach umírat? kvůli fašistům co si cpou kapsy dolarama?

[JonnyT]

Bloody circus.
Killer drug addict clowns carry illogical nonsense ......
Well, well, it means the elimination of the criminal military-political leadership as a justified measure

[Crimean partisan 1974]

“There will be no new Minsk-3”: Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba announced the refusal

... to visit Madrid, ... and someone offered him ... not really a light cutlet

[YanniKounnar]

Je trouve qu'ils repètent un peu trop fréquemment : pas de négociations, pas de négociation...
Est ce à l'adresse de Moscou ou du peuple Ukrainien ?
Surtout avec toutes ces démissions en cascades, mutation, "accidents" ...on peu s'interroger

yandex

I find that they repeat too often: no negotiations, no negotiations...
Is it addressed to Moscow or the Ukrainian people?
Especially with all these cascading resignations, transfers, "accidents" ... we wonder little

[Sniper]

Kuleba!! we don't need a peace treaty with you. we need your surrender! denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine!

[Arbeiternegast]

Duc well said kuleba, now it’s not decent to turn on the back! especially "our" all sorts of Abramovichs can now not dream of Minsk 3m. Once started, now non-stop.

[Ezekiel 25-17]

Does he think he will sit out "On the Last Shore"?

[Metallurg_2]

That's right, no "Minsk" - only Nuremberg over the criminal regime and its accomplices.
But this requires steel Faberge, and our leadership does not see them.

[Skif]

She is strange, this Kuleba. It seems that someone offers them negotiations!

[Virus-free crown]

The only thing Kuleba is right about is that in 2014 we had to accept Donbass as part of the Russian Federation, like Crimea Then there would definitely be no one And now we are raking up the "cases of bygone days" - after all, then, both Crimea and Donbass similarly voted for joining the Russian Federation - only the Crimeans turned out to be "whiter" than the Donbass (((((((

[Dude]

The only thing Kuleba is right about is that in 2014 we had to accept the Donbass as part of the Russian Federation, like Crimea. good Then there would definitely not be any of our own ...

In 2014, it was necessary not to stop until Chop and Chernivtsi. But history, as you know, does not tolerate the subjunctive mood.

[YanniKounnar]

Je trouve que Harry Potter a mal vieilli et beaucoup grossi! :-)

I think Harry Potter has aged a lot and grown a lot! :-)

[1razvgod]

It makes no sense to sign anything with the urks, well, honestly, why?!? they jumped, well, let them jump, the diagnosis was signed and all treatment was accepted and carried out

[Zaurbek]

If Minsk3 takes place, then it will be stupidity on our part. I don’t know how to conclude any kind of political agreements with civilized countries. Erdogan is more capable of negotiating than the entire EU

[Dude]

Erdogan is more capable of negotiating than the entire EU

Horseradish, as they say, radishes are not sweeter. Osman does not stop dreaming about the Great Turan. And he moves this topic very actively.

[Clone]

What a formidable ministerial...probably stamped his foot during his speech. So Estonia is outdone in incredible militancy.

[Jsem_CZEKO68]

Rusko nemá s kým jednat ao čem jednat! Fašismus musí být poražen, i ten západní! EU, NATO, USA, CIA všechno jsou fašisti a je zbytečné jednat s dementy, oni nemají zdravý mozek!

[sifgame]

You might think someone offers him negotiations

[Terenin]

"There will be no new Minsk-3": Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba announced Ukraine's refusal to sign a peace agreement with Russia

Kuleba, together with the Ukrainian authorities, need not worry about negotiations. They are not sovereign; - there is no one and call them - no way.

[Orkraider]

The mistakes of the Minsk process should not be repeated. In fact, they should serve as an example of how not to negotiate with the West and its tail - Bandera and Nazi 404

[Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira]

What a disgusting erysipelas!
With these "kulebs" negotiations are over. Putin may make a mistake, but hoping that he will repeat it is too much even for the Master Kuleba!

[Skeptic3]

Such funny comments. As if for 11 months on this site, no one understood anything. Or just afraid to begin to understand. Fearfully? This is right. There is something to fear.

[Shiden]

Some are already starting to get it. It looks like word of mouth from the front conveys truthful information, and not just what they say about the zombies.

[kot711]

and not what they say about the zomboyaschik. ,,
Yes, according to your box, you are already preparing for the parade on Red Square. I watch a sweet couple roam, your European aspirations are immediately noticeable.

[Boycott]

And what about Ukraine in general? All wars have economic causes, and this one is no exception. The collective West can no longer buy resources at market prices and has decided that Russia can be bent over and robbed. But no one asked Ukraine and is not going to ask, they use it to the end and that's it, there will be no more of it.

[former soldier]

And what about Ukraine in general? All wars have economic causes, and this one is no exception. The collective West can no longer buy resources at market prices and has decided that Russia can be bent over and robbed.

And if you remember the prices for Russian gas and oil until 2021 and Russia's foreign trade surplus of 200 billion dollars annually, you will understand that energy resources were already sold much lower than the already low market price. Apparently, the appetite of the West has been played out so much that it is now required to give them away for nothing.

[sgrabik]

Ukraine is already practically gone, damn this country.

[sgrabik]

This bespectacled penguin, with some kind of fright, thinks that Russia is going to agree on something with his criminal puppet regime, negotiations are possible only on unconditional surrender, disarmament and surrender of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as the arrest of the criminal government in Kyiv.

[Skeptic3]

Let's immediately talk about the surrender of the United States and the surrender of the Biden government? Why be petty?

[sgrabik]

Compared jo...y with a finger, you have already put Ukraine on a par with the United States, well, you de-beat however.

[Christian Revuelta]

good news. Who needs bogus fake treaties... Take Kiev once and for all and hang Zelensky, best solution

[Andron78]

It is difficult to understand people who throw their compatriots into the furnace, but you can ... because it can just be business.
It is even more difficult to understand those who march in formation into this furnace, but it is possible ... because they could be drugged with propaganda or intimidated.
But it’s almost impossible to understand those who started it all and support it ... because ... what’s next, when the cannon fodder in Ukraine runs out, when the missiles come out of the mines ...

[opposite28]

The mistakes of the Minsk process should not be repeated. In fact, they should serve as an example of how not to negotiate with Russia (...) Any hypothetical "Minsk-3" will have only one result - an even more bloody war

- said the Ukrainian minister

After the very fact of the physical presence in Ukraine of firing Abrams and Leopard MBTs (not to mention the Challenger), there will definitely not be "Minsk-3" towards the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation ...

[Shamil88]

It's good that the Khokh.lys don't let the Kremlin drain the NVO, otherwise they're already sick of the word "negotiations", the whole day they're playing on TV what kind of Khokh.ly scoundrels, Nazis, Bandera, and in the evening the Foreign Ministry or Peskov will say we don't refuse negotiations, convince the wolf to eat grass place of meat, in order to return all the loot for 30 years

[Neutron Retarded]

Quote: Skeptik3

Let's immediately talk about the surrender of the United States and the surrender of the Biden government? Why be petty?

All in good time.

[Skeptic3]

Are you planning to live? Our ancestors repeated these rituals for decades. And you are still there.

[Neutron Retarded]

Quote: Skeptik3

Are you planning to live? Our ancestors repeated these rituals for decades. And you are still there.

I don’t know who your ancestors are, but judging by the comments, with my ancestors they were sitting in different trenches opposite each other.
As for the United States, the collapse of this country is inevitable. By analogy with the collapse of the USSR. It will collapse from internal contradictions and unsustainable debts. This does not mean that they will disappear from the world map. But their ambitions will be tempered. Well, they will drink the blood of those around them. Which is exactly what we are seeing right now. The larger the closet, the louder it falls.

[Anatoly Proskurin]

They count on killing OURS. And in large numbers. After all, there WILL BE weapons! ... Despite the red stripes from the Kremlin .... I’m already thinking, OURS or .... I remember Borodino. "Don't the commanders, strangers dare to rip off their uniforms? .... about tactical nuclear weapons.

[Cat Alexandrovich]

... "any contracts" ...
The ignorance of the authors of VO drives ... As always ...

[ValeraKrasovski]

There can be no peace agreement with the Ukronazi authorities that came to the helm of the state during the coup in 2014. With a normal government, not a Nazi treaty is possible.

[Skeptic3]

Many have been talking about this lately using the example of the two Koreas, which have been coexisting for 70 years in a temporary ceasefire. Without a peace treaty.

[Thompson]

What Minsk! Only Kyiv about surrender!

[optimist007]

With you rats, now no one will even sign a surrender, you go right away to London, you will be a government in exile until the money runs out.

[Skeptic3]

On February 24, one of these "rats" responded to the offer of evacuation: "I don't need a taxi, I need a weapon."
Underestimation of the enemy? No, have not heard...

[Seal]

Quote: Skeptik3

Russia cannot call for much more than it has already called for.

It may well. And further. Last year, North Korea offered Russia to send up to 100 of its volunteers to participate in a special operation in Ukraine. Kim Jong-un's offer, by the way, is still in force.
And if Kim Jong-un's fighters appear, then what prevents two or three small (200-300 thousand people each) groups of Chinese volunteers, dressed, of course, in North Korean uniforms, from appearing?

[Skeptic3]

I'm afraid you're quoting rumors and stating your dreams. They are very far from reality.

[Rage66]

I remembered a joke about the elusive Joe, who is elusive because no one needs us.
Does someone Minsk-3 offer Chubats that they refuse?

[Petr_Koldunov]

And who is talking about Minsk-3? This kuleba is fundamentally wrong - it is precisely for us that such a world is absolutely unacceptable. Minsk-3 would be a shame for Russia!
Of course, all sorts of Peskovs and Medinas would be happy to make peace on any terms and make a bunch of goodwill gestures for this, giving the Chewbaks everything up to the Urals ... but I hope those who really make decisions have nothing like this in their plans!

[Vasilyevich Pensioner]

"There will be no new Minsk-3": Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba announced Ukraine's refusal to sign a peace agreement with Russia

Who offered them something?

[blackcat]

The mice cried, pricked but continued to eat the cactus!!!