March elections in Kazakhstan and the realities of politics according to the “method of optimal decisions” K.-Zh. Tokaev

20
March elections in Kazakhstan and the realities of politics according to the “method of optimal decisions” K.-Zh. Tokaev


The original model of political transformation


On January 19, decrees of President K.-Zh. Tokayev on the dissolution of the lower house of parliament (Majilis) and the dissolution of regional people's assemblies of deputies (maslikhats). By decrees, early parliamentary elections for March 19 and an instruction from the CEC to organize the preparation of elections in the regions are scheduled. It is possible that something like our "single voting day" will be organized. These elections should complete the transformation of the political system of our neighbors in accordance with plan "September 1 reforms".



Until the election of a new lower house of parliament, legislative powers will be exercised by the upper house - the Senate of the Republic, a significant part of whose composition (40%) went through the procedure of their midterm elections a week ago. Twenty out of fifty seats were elected. And here it is interesting to see that out of these twenty places, sixteen were occupied by new faces. This is a remarkable ratio, given that ten seats in the upper house are officially appointed directly by the President of the Republic.

Actually, a feature of the future elections in Kazakhstan will not be the emergence of some new political forces to the world, but the most complete renewal of the composition of the parliament from the main parties. And in this case, such renewal goes hand in hand with the renewal of local executive authorities (akimats). That is, the question is not whether the three main parties will win, but in what updated composition they will be represented in the Mazhilis and in the regions.

In order to consolidate this renewal, Tokayev changed the balance between party-list elections and single-mandate constituencies. If before that almost all deputies were elected on party lists and 9 out of 107 - by the Assembly of Peoples of Kazakhstan (that is, they were actually approved in Akorda), now the proportion will be 70% on party lists and 30% on single-mandate constituencies, at the level of regional councils the proportion will be 50% to 50%, at the district level - 100% will be elected by a single-seat system.

The author has repeatedly noted a rather unusual model of political transformation for the region, which has been repeatedly demonstrated by the leadership of Astana. A kind of "method of optimal solutions". Tokayev did not begin to form in advance a separate political force "in the center", he simply transformed the ruling "Nur Otan" into "Amanat", giving almost a year for the representatives and henchmen of his predecessor to decide on the position, and then - "whoever left, he gone". But to decide is not just a set of words in this case, since a significant part of the positions in the local executive power was quite naturally represented by this party. The new electoral system will also allow Astana to expand the representation of Russians and the Russian-speaking population in the system of local councils without emphasizing it.

And now, already in the midterm elections to the Senate, it becomes clear that the renewal at all levels below will be very significant. That is, without significantly changing the political map as such, Tokayev replaces the personnel in it, which, in fact, will constitute the de facto centrist bloc that will carry out the September 1 reform program from top to bottom. Before the lower house of parliament was dissolved, Tokayev carried out the abolition of the constitutional law “On the first president of the Republic of Kazakhstan - Elbasy”, and even earlier the state celebration of the “day of the first president” was also canceled. With the abolition of the law "On the First President ...", N. Nazarbayev's immunity was lifted not only for his actions in the presidency, but also after his departure.

However, a specific and practical interest in this case is another provision of this law, namely Art. 3:

“Inviolability extends to all property owned by the right of private property to the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan - Elbasy and members of his family living with him, as well as to the residential and office premises used by them, official vehicles, means of communication, correspondence, documents belonging to them. Inviolability also extends to property belonging to the fund of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan - Elbasy and other legal entities established by him.

Actually, with this Tokayev put a logical, although not yet final, point in the clan confrontation in the republic. The final one will be set after the March elections. The case of the riots in January last year is far from over, and Tokayev is not going to make any special concessions in terms of control over energy and financial assets to the team of his predecessor, especially since his “public consensus” on democratization and social reforms is not least built on this. . There is also the issue of strengthening investments, which Kazakhstan traditionally attracts from China, Britain and the Netherlands, because in September last year, collecting assets back, Tokayev announced the expansion of privatization opportunities.

Language issue


Our politicians, including the expert community and the media, will have to get used to such work “according to the method of optimal decisions” in cooperation with Kazakhstan. For example, the author predicts that in order to facilitate the so-called. "Language issue" after the full launch of the reforms, Astana will conduct an accelerated course of practical translation into Latin. In the local discourse, everyone will have to get used to this and, oddly enough, “ultra-nationalists” and “Russian-speakers”, while Russian will formally remain the second state. In reality, the very process of such a transition can turn out to be very non-trivial even for those who have previously uploaded videos “for the language”. For Russian speakers, this will definitely be an informational occasion, and for Astana, it will be the “optimal solution”.

And so in everything. “Relocators” left the mobilization, please relocate, just do not forget that the free period of stay is shortened, and in Astana hotels a “fee” of 5% per day of the cost of living is charged. Sign contracts for the supply and transit of “sanctions”, but do not forget to issue a customs certificate, etc., etc. the framework of the "method of optimal solutions" will not do. Even the arrival of deputies from “environmentalists” (and they will definitely be there) will enable Astana to integrate into various “climatic” dialogues, and quite organically.

Single payment instrument for Central Asia


In Russia, there has been (and is still being) a public discussion about projects under the general name “USSR-2.0” for quite a long time, they say, sooner or later, under the umbrella of either the EAEU or some other, greater Eurasia will unite into a new formation. The March elections in Kazakhstan will not immediately close such a discussion, but they will open another one - more realistic and pragmatic, how to build long-term relations in the most optimal way there.

In fact, this already became clear after the October SCO summit, and in December, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, two permanent regional rivals, signed a Union Treaty, various forms of such interaction with Kyrgyzstan are being discussed. That is, the region itself forms its core, even taking into account a decent difference in the direction of the search for investments: Kazakhstan - Britain, the Netherlands, China, Uzbekistan - the UAE. Such processes of searching for forms of regional "self-integration" could be observed all summer and autumn, some steps were also written on the pages of the Military Review.

All this does not mean some kind of catastrophe, but it requires finally to look at things realistically. The EurAsEC and EAEU formats are more than 20 years old, but the volume of foreign trade between Kazakhstan and Russia does not exceed 6% of the total foreign trade turnover of this neighboring state. No matter how hard the team of S. Glazyev fought, our financial elite did not want to push through and finance non-primary exports, and indeed work in this direction. This is not only with Kazakhstan, you can take any republic and look at the indicators - the common space was normatively formed, but there was nothing special to fill. With Kazakhstan, there are still indicators - $ 24 billion, which are high relative to other countries, at least due to raw materials and fertilizers.

It is not worth giving up the experience gained and developments in these formats, it provides not only finance or trade flows, but also interaction as such, joint planning and coordination tools, and this is not bad in the current situation. Now we need to consider ourselves from a purely pragmatic point of view, rather, as part of a large “eastern economic cluster”, although it would be ironic if this year it is Kazakhstan that comes up with the initiative to create a single payment instrument for Central Asia, and this initiative is accepted by the neighbors.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    24 January 2023 05: 27
    It can be summarized that Central Asia is leaving from under the wing of the Russian Federation. The EurAsEC and the EAEU somehow didn’t really unite, and the CIS all the more .. A popular meme is remembered: Forgive us, Yura! We all....
    1. +5
      24 January 2023 05: 40
      Well, since the EAEU and the previous format were actually needed to carry out re-export and to build relations around pipes, then in general everything is natural. Commodity filling did not work out, although Belarus and Armenia in the EAEU format grew quite well in trade. And on our side, the elites had no particular desire to fill the niche with goods. Although the regulatory framework of the EAEU is quite decent.
      1. +2
        24 January 2023 06: 17
        Although the regulatory framework of the EAEU is quite decent.
        Any base, even manufactured goods, should be filled with something, storage facilities, no matter how good they were, should not be idle. smile
        1. +5
          24 January 2023 06: 27
          And you can watch an interview with S. Glazyev. He cannot fully say everything there, simply because he is a state official in the same EAEU, but much is clear even without special explanations. And he fulfilled his task - to build an organization and a legal base. But now, alas, to fill projects with credit money. Yes, and warehouses, you are right, too)
          1. -1
            24 January 2023 06: 40
            And he fulfilled his task - to build an organization and a legal base.
            I don’t argue with the “walls”, erected, laid the base .. Only here .. somehow .. everything ..
            1. +1
              24 January 2023 08: 17
              It can be summarized that Central Asia is leaving from under the wing of the Russian Federation. The EurAsEC and the EAEU somehow didn’t really unite, and the CIS all the more .. A popular meme is remembered: Forgive us, Yura! We all....
              \
              And what did we propose for this, what attractive socio-economic model of the development of society? The raw-material economy, the oligarchy and the corruption of the people, they have their own.
  2. -6
    24 January 2023 05: 48
    Well, in short, as I understand it: our boys saved Tokaev's "fifth point" for "just like that" and even at the expense of Russia? feel when did it get burned? didn't even say "thank you" am
    1. +5
      24 January 2023 05: 54
      The policy of the late Nazarbayev could sooner or later lead to a social explosion, so the big question is what would be better. His "elites" were also never pro-Russian. From some point of view, Tokayev is even more predictable and strategically clear, although projects like USSR2.0 will definitely not take off with him. Another thing is that we do not have a product content for this project, but this is not a question for Tokaev)
      1. -4
        24 January 2023 06: 13
        You: as the Author of the article drinks much has not been said feel
        Tokayev staked everything... And now it is enough for Russia not to intervene for Kazakhstan to burst into flames like a powder keg wink Well, there who will be the first to send troops to pacify - we or China - that new Kazakhstan will be)))
        1. +5
          24 January 2023 06: 23
          So I have more than one article on these topics. I just tried to make sure that you can always return to the previous ones in retrospect as part of the whole.
          He put something, but then the question is already different, but what Russia really wanted in return. No, it is clear that in our public opinion there is such a "trend")), that they say Tokayev should have recognized Crimea and fired shells. But was this part of the "informal agreement"? Well obviously not.
          Tokayev is building a kind of model, with an eye on leadership in Central Asia, but without sharp corners with us. The answer here in terms of "who is in charge" can only be economically and adequately economically - by the growth of the participation of our economy in the region. But since this is not the case, and we are in fact busy with other things, we have what we have.
  3. +3
    24 January 2023 06: 02
    Throughout the post-Soviet space, everything is based on the relations of the first persons of the countries. Time passes, but nothing has been done to create such relations between the public. Neither cultural nor sports. All these relationships are so shaky that they can collapse years later. We are moving further and further away from each other.
    1. 0
      24 January 2023 20: 12
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      We are moving further and further away from each other.

      The structure of the economy of the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan (and they are similar in many respects) determines the policy of mutual relations. Yes, Kazakhstan needs Russia - it is profitable to trade (minimum restrictions), it is beneficial for the CSTO. But the raw orientation of the economy of both countries leads to competition, so Kazakhstan in the current political situation will attract Western investment and technology for its own development. Russia's financial investments are limited, and Russia itself is in great need of advanced technologies. Therefore, there are all prerequisites for good neighborly relations between the two countries. But it is not worth waiting for them in the trenches in the Donbass. And if the Kazakhs manage not to slide into religious fanaticism and Russophobia, then relations between our countries will be good. hi
  4. -3
    24 January 2023 07: 02
    Decrees of the President published in Kazakhstan K.-J. Tokaev on the dissolution of the lower house of parliament (Mazhilis) and the dissolution of regional people's assemblies of deputies (maslikhats).
    "Mr. PJ three times KU" (film "Kin-dza-dza"). But Mr. K. Zh. Tokayev clearly began to row not in the direction of Russia (I'm not talking about the dissolution of parliament).
  5. +3
    24 January 2023 08: 56
    Interesting about Kazakhstan. He was the eternal deputy, a small coup d'état and no one remembers grandfather.
  6. +1
    24 January 2023 09: 21
    On January 19, decrees of President K.-Zh. Tokayev on the dissolution of the lower house of parliament (Majilis) and the dissolution of regional people's assemblies of deputies (maslikhats).
    Something was recalled:
    "Well, let's have a holiday, the Holiday teases and calls! Well, let's have a holiday. A little coup! Don't be scared, it's just a holiday. We'll just fool around a bit and that's it. Unfortunately, life is monotonous .. So let's have fun!" (C)
  7. +1
    24 January 2023 09: 34
    To put it simply, according to the Goblin, we simply have nothing to offer them.
    People are drawn to where the money and resources are.
    And Europe, China, America have money.

    And Glazyev will have to be seen, although ....
  8. +1
    24 January 2023 21: 04
    I like the position of the author as a whole. The way the integration / disintegration processes are developing in the post-Soviet space is a consequence not only of the political, social and economic problems of the new states and not so much the influence of the notorious West (mainly the USA and the EU) and the conditional East (primarily China, but not only), as a consequence of the lack of a development strategy (based on the idea of ​​social justice, which is attractive to the majority), the deformed structure of the economy and, accordingly, the weakness of Russia's position...
  9. 0
    25 January 2023 11: 32
    The weaker Russia is, the faster the economic “stickies” scatter, the ideas that they are imperial and Soviet, they have never shared, and even now they are not interested in them
  10. -1
    29 January 2023 06: 51
    Here, many have already noticed that Kazakhstan is slowly but surely "floating away" from Russia's orbit. Of course, you can blame the Kazakhs for being such and such (and also the Americans), but the Kazakhs actually have absolutely nothing to do with it. The Kazakhs also have eyes and they also know how to see what is happening in neighboring China (and in general in Asian countries) and what is happening here in Russia. If something really progressive and promising were built here, even if not the Russian Singapore, but a really promising and progressive country with a great future, then it’s not that Kazakhstan, and even Ukraine itself, asked to join us! After all, once the whole world saw the scientific achievements of the USSR, Soviet scientific and technological progress and the generally worthy Soviet model of development, so they themselves were drawn to us. And now what can we offer our closest neighbors (I generally keep quiet about the rest of the world)? Well, except perhaps the yachts of the oligarchs and the palaces of their mistresses in Europe ... Here is the answer to the question: why is Kazakhstan fleeing from us (and other former "brotherly" republics too).
    1. 0
      29 January 2023 09: 09
      We are also drifting from the Asian side. Slowly but surely. It was better to drift on a wide ice floe, like a strong "expanded EAEU", but for 20 years this topic has not been mastered. However, they didn't really try. I still remember at work that we were waiting for changes towards real integration, but then it became clear to everyone that we would not go deeper. So we will drift with half-hearted integration and, in fact, separately. Maybe Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan will achieve the creation of a kind of economic core in the end and bring Kyrgyzstan there. At least last year, the Kyrgyz were not opposed, and Astana and Tashkent have grown to a union treaty

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"