Chinese Ministry of Defense: US version of the incident between Chinese and American aircraft is slander and advertising

19
Chinese Ministry of Defense: US version of the incident between Chinese and American aircraft is slander and advertising

Beijing reminded Washington of the existence of international rules for aircraft. We are talking about an incident over the South China Sea involving a PLA fighter and an American reconnaissance aircraft, which was filed by the US authorities from their point of view.

The Chinese Ministry of Defense commented on Washington's statement.



They believe that the US version of last week's incident between Chinese and American planes is "slander and advertising." The Chinese defense ministry claims that Washington decided to ignore the truth about what happened, deliberately distorting the information.

We are talking about the report of the command of the US Armed Forces in the Indo-Pacific region that the J-11 fighter of the Chinese Armed Forces allegedly approached the American RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft by six meters. The crew of the US Air Force aircraft, this maneuver was regarded as dangerous and forced him to sharply change course to evade.


The representative of the PRC defense department, Tian Jiulin, believes that the Americans actually carried out dangerous actions in the airspace, putting the J-11 of the PLA Air Force at risk. He explained that the Chinese pilot issued numerous warnings to the Americans, after which he took the standard actions provided for in the instructions. The PRC military said they have evidence to support their claim.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    2 January 2023 11: 39
    This is good, when they pump it up like that, maybe one of the pilots will press the trigger and .... everything will finally start!
  2. +3
    2 January 2023 11: 39
    Let the Americans rejoice that the Chinese pilot did not shoot the "luminous" dipoles. Pilots from Canada "liked" it last year.
    1. +3
      2 January 2023 11: 47
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Let the Americans rejoice that the Chinese pilot did not shoot the "luminous" dipoles. Pilots from Canada "liked" last year.

      Right! When we showed off - and we are cool. When they took Faberge, it's not my fault.
      If it happened that the Americans would not help them in any way, from the word never.
  3. +3
    2 January 2023 11: 42
    The Americans filmed the video and showed it. Where are the coordinates of the incident? If PRC airspace is nearby, then why complain about a warning maneuver?
  4. +7
    2 January 2023 11: 43
    Oh Chinese, Chinese, you don't learn anything from your older comrades!
    It was necessary either to justify them (lower a little fuel on them from the top) or accidentally drop a rocket (the British now don’t show up, monkeys only climb), or you can fly over the deck of an aircraft carrier (but first your ships with supersonic anti-ship missiles must be nearby ).
    In general, there are many options, they tease you and you tease them .....
    1. +1
      2 January 2023 12: 53
      Enough to get out of the moratorium and shandarakht 30 megatons on Novaya Zemlya. To clear your mind.
    2. +3
      2 January 2023 16: 32
      Quote from Fizik13
      It was necessary to either defend them (lower a little fuel on them from the top) or accidentally drop the rocket (the British now do not show up, the monkeys only climb),

      The hungfuzes do not have air "hooligans" like Vasily Tsimbal ... No. And he would probably have already gone further: after dropping jet fuel ahead and higher at the rate of RC-135, he would now, in addition to everything, shoot IR traps in a series ... for more fireworks! fellow
      Something similar is shown in the STEALTH movie, when fuel is gushing from an air tanker, which sets fire to the torch of the VV district ... and then BIG BAD BOOM happens ... good
      After that, scouts would fly only accompanied by IA ... Well, what kind of "intelligence" would they have after that ... Tears, and nothing more. And the IA park would wear out like GOOD MORNING!!! Yes
      However, as V.S. Vysotsky:
      - There are few real violent
      So there are no leaders ... (c) Yes
  5. -2
    2 January 2023 11: 43
    On the J11 video? What is going on? It's su27
    1. +1
      2 January 2023 11: 54
      Quote: Argon
      It's su27

      What's the difference (visually)?
    2. +6
      2 January 2023 11: 59
      Quote: Argon
      On the J11 video? What is going on? It's su27

      The Shenyang J-11 is a Chinese multi-role fighter, which is a licensed version of the Soviet Su-27 fighter, manufactured by the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation.
      The basic version of the J-11 was assembled from Russian components.
      The J-11B modification uses the Su-27SK airframe, but is equipped with Chinese avionics and weapons systems.
      The J-11D received new avionics from the more modern J-16 fighter (a strike version of the two-seat J-11BS). The aircraft is equipped with an active phased array radar, a new control system, and a new in-flight refueling system. Composite materials are widely used in the airframe design.

  6. +1
    2 January 2023 11: 49
    Well, arrange a confrontation.
    Show an example to the whole world for which international rules were created.
    1. +4
      2 January 2023 13: 28
      No need! Neher just fly not near their shores, each animal protects its hole
  7. +2
    2 January 2023 12: 23
    A J-11 fighter of the Chinese Armed Forces allegedly approached an American RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft by six meters. The crew of the US Air Force aircraft, this maneuver was regarded as dangerous and forced him to sharply change course to evade.

    Americaners have a conditioned reflex - as soon as they see the characteristic silhouette of "drying", they immediately start to shy away ... request
    1. +2
      2 January 2023 13: 30
      immediately start shaking

      Stay at home where it's safe
  8. +4
    2 January 2023 12: 32
    The typical approach is exceptional. How to spoil this sacred thing themselves is allowed, how anyone dares to approach them for a kilometer, then immediately it’s unsafe for a screech, ah, ah, and so on and so forth.
  9. +2
    2 January 2023 12: 46
    Weapon shown! Respect and respect.
    1. +1
      2 January 2023 13: 31
      I would have fired at the rate of the General Staff - 301
      Ttttttttttt
  10. -1
    3 January 2023 02: 55
    "The crew of the US Air Force aircraft regarded this maneuver as dangerous and forced it to sharply change course to evade" - they saw the missiles and tear ..... It's scary when one on one! accustomed to "work" as a pack of wolves.
  11. +1
    5 January 2023 18: 56
    As long as no one has struck anyone and the stabilizer has not fallen off in flight (as it happened more than once before), you can continue to show each other biceps and squares on your stomach ...