NATO Secretary General: There is no need to expect the end of the armed conflict in Ukraine in the near future

29
NATO Secretary General: There is no need to expect the end of the armed conflict in Ukraine in the near future

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, whose powers were extended "due to the conflict in Ukraine", spoke about the timing of this conflict.

According to Stoltenberg, it is not necessary to expect the end of the armed conflict in Ukraine in the near future. He noted that NATO "needs to prepare for long-term assistance to Kyiv."



Stoltenberg:

Certain successes of the Ukrainian army should not create illusions about the imminent victory of Kyiv. It is also necessary to take into account the fact that Russia has mobilized and is now training these military personnel.

According to the NATO Secretary General, "the Russian army is preparing for a possible new offensive, for the continuation of the war, which may be protracted."

Recall that the Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that they are ready to enter into peace negotiations solely taking into account the prevailing realities, namely, with the condition that the Kyiv regime and the West take into account the entry into the Russian Federation of new subjects (DPR, LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions), and also taking into account the recognition of Crimea and Sevastopol as Russian.

For the United States, the continuation of the conflict in Ukraine is the most beneficial. Therefore, Washington does not need the parties to enter into peace negotiations. And Stoltenberg, as a talking head, actually says that the United States will continue to "support Kyiv", which in normal language means "support" to the last Ukrainian.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    2 January 2023 07: 16
    US military doctrine is that they can only fight one conflict at a time, so why not create problems for them and their closest ally-instigator Britain elsewhere in the world? Scotland, Northern Ireland, Basques in Spain, Falklands, Middle East, Korea, Cuba............. choose
    1. +3
      2 January 2023 07: 24
      How and with what forces are you going to create a ,, conflict ,,? NATO does not involve military forces other than logistics and training.
      1. -1
        2 January 2023 07: 50
        Quote: ASAD
        How and with what forces are you going to create a ,, conflict ,,? NATO does not involve military forces other than logistics and training.

        Crete
        1. 0
          2 January 2023 18: 08
          Quote: fa2998
          Crete

          Turkey is still expanding at the expense of Russia's zones of influence in the Caucasus and Ukraine, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Macedonia, Bosnia, and Bulgaria. Greece Turkey in the next 20 years will not bite. It is foolish to get involved with the expenditure of resources in the struggle in Africa and Asia, when the resources are sorely lacking for the development of their own industry. The FSB officers seized an electrical plant near the Elektrozavodskaya metro station, were greedy for $ 2000 a month for the salary of a specialist in switching control equipment, but invested in a plant in Ukraine and the salary of 7 such Ukrainian specialists. And what are the results of these investments. The Moscow designer fled to Montenegro to sell real estate in this country when he realized that the management considers him an unrequited loser. The owners of the electric plant were expelled from Ukraine.
    2. 0
      2 January 2023 07: 34
      Our satellites need nodes that are produced abroad. Should they fight against themselves?
      Quote from Silver99
      US military doctrine is that they can only fight one conflict at a time, so why not create problems for them and their closest ally-instigator Britain elsewhere in the world? Scotland

      Quote from Silver99
      US military doctrine is that they can only fight one conflict at a time, so why not create problems for them and their closest ally-instigator Britain elsewhere in the world? Scotland

      Quote from Silver99
      US military doctrine is that they can only fight one conflict at a time, so why not create problems for them and their closest ally-instigator Britain elsewhere in the world? Scotland
    3. +2
      2 January 2023 08: 09
      need to create ... Britain's closest ally-instigator of trouble in ... Scotland, Northern Ireland, the Basques in Spain, the Falklands, the Middle East, Korea, Cuba

      It is high time. Immediately, the agility of the impudent Saxons would have diminished ..
  2. +2
    2 January 2023 07: 17
    namely, with the condition that the Kyiv regime and the West take into account the entry into the Russian Federation of new subjects (DNR, LNR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions), as well as taking into account the recognition of Crimea and Sevastopol as Russian.
    The West will not go to this ..
    1. +2
      2 January 2023 07: 20
      I don’t care what Stoltenberg has and what he thinks. What is happening near Svatovo and Kreminnaya? Yesterday, an unhappy situation there was published in the VO cart
      1. +1
        2 January 2023 07: 28
        What is there!? It seems that I monitor everything, incl. And enemy channels.
        1. 0
          2 January 2023 07: 33
          Cart VO-enemy channel? Read the message .. The initiative is completely with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, they are advancing on both banks of the river.
          1. +1
            2 January 2023 07: 42
            I read it. Previously, somewhere it flashed that the basics were transferred there
      2. +1
        2 January 2023 07: 29
        They write contradictory things about Makiivka, no one is in a hurry to write the results with the latest laws.
        1. +2
          2 January 2023 07: 33
          Yes, I read. Well, it was necessary to place people so .... no words
      3. +1
        2 January 2023 07: 40
        I don't care what Stoltenberg has there
        There is no need to expect the end of the armed conflict in Ukraine in the near future ..
        Yesterday, an unhappy situation was published in the VO cart
        How can you not care..
  3. +2
    2 January 2023 07: 27
    Also, I congratulate our participants on the New Year! In this happiness! drinks
  4. +3
    2 January 2023 07: 29
    Another year will definitely be SVO.
    Moreover, the army is infantry, not technological.
  5. +3
    2 January 2023 07: 29
    Stoltenberg voiced a kind of program. With all their strength and capabilities, they will not let the conflict die out. Something else will be thrown in if needed. Their geopolitical goal is clear.
    1. 0
      2 January 2023 07: 53
      The West is strong for the long term, in this constancy it does not hold, but the GDP with the team, on the sly, even for years, (Syria) is still grinding pro-Western proxies, we will see what will happen on the Krajina ....
    2. 0
      2 January 2023 12: 30
      Quote: kaufman
      With all their strength and capabilities, they will not let the conflict die out. Something else will be thrown in if needed.

      Until something happens in the west, as in America, when they hit the Pentagon and filled up the towers, the twins will not calm down.
      1. 0
        2 January 2023 22: 50
        So after all, they themselves hit them. Created an incident white.
  6. +1
    2 January 2023 07: 29
    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, whose powers were extended “in connection with the conflict in Ukraine”, spoke about the timing of this conflict.

    It is not necessary to expect the end of the armed conflict in Ukraine in the near future

    Do not add - do not add ... Here it is the PERSON OF INTEREST
  7. +1
    2 January 2023 07: 30
    For the United States, the continuation of the conflict in Ukraine is the most beneficial. Therefore, Washington does not need the parties to enter into peace negotiations.

    if only the United States, otherwise all consumers of Russian products / resources, including Africa, which received fertilizers for free, this war turns out to be beneficial, even part of the Ukrainians are beneficial (those who managed to escape to Europe)
  8. 0
    2 January 2023 07: 31
    This homosexual from NATO is always setting out some kind of prophecy that either does not come true, or the situation is already obvious.
  9. +4
    2 January 2023 07: 39
    This was initially clear.
    Therefore, our task is to make sure that with each day of the conflict, NATO's long-term goals become less and less achievable.
    The real goals of NATO:
    1. The weakening and division of Russia, the transfer of territories under external control, direct access to cheap resources.
    Accordingly, our task is:
    - Strengthening the country, increasing defense capability, technological breakthrough.
    Only a technological breakthrough will make the main goal of NATO unattainable.
    2. Making a profit by changing the current prices for resources.
    Here the NATO countries have contradictions, the US "eats in one throat."
    Our task is to strengthen these contradictions, to reduce the flow of cheap resources.
    The best means for this will be the reorientation of the economy from the native (mining) to the modern (manufacturing), stimulation of the processing of resources within the country.
    3. The West benefits from the military-political defeat of Russia.
    Historically, such defeats happened not only from purely military failures, but also from a demonstration of Russia's backwardness, unjustified losses, and accompanying social unrest. Examples: Crimean War (severe technological lag, but there was no revolution), 1905, 1917.
    Therefore, our goal is to minimize losses and achieve technological parity as soon as possible.
    The best way to do this is the state program for the development of high-tech industries.
    1. +3
      2 January 2023 07: 54
      A technological breakthrough is great, but who will help us make it? That's right, nobody. The oligarchs have enough trade in resources.
  10. +1
    2 January 2023 08: 30
    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, whose powers were extended "due to the conflict in Ukraine"
    whom war NWO, and to whom is the mother related.
  11. +1
    2 January 2023 08: 55
    For the United States, the continuation of the conflict in Ukraine is the most beneficial.


    So far, yes, very profitable ...
  12. +2
    2 January 2023 10: 33
    Although he is an enemy, for some reason I trust him more than our commander in chief.
  13. 0
    3 January 2023 23: 41
    To die or not for the interests of the United States is the free choice of the Ukrainians themselves.
    If they had chosen life, they would have turned the weapons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to Kyiv and would have thrown off the Nazi power there, they would have brought to power a government that would have made peace with Russia at any cost.

    However, in Ukraine in 2022, as in Germany in 1944, the Nazi ideology has already entered the flesh and blood of every member of society, and they will fight to their end, until the complete catastrophe and death of Ukraine.

    Well, in this case, we also have no choice - the state of Ukraine must be completely and finally finished off at any cost, liquidated, the Russian lands from Uzhgorod to Donetsk, from Izmail to Chernigov must be cleared of the Nazis and unconditionally returned to the Russian Federation as its subjects of the Federation.
    Without options.
    No more Ukraine on these primordially Russian lands, Putin is obliged to prevent.