Armenian Prime Minister announced the “loss” of control over the Lachin corridor by Russian peacekeepers

50
Armenian Prime Minister announced the “loss” of control over the Lachin corridor by Russian peacekeepers

Today, during a conversation with the Russian President during a visit to the Russian Museum, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that Russian peacekeepers have not controlled the Lachin corridor for 20 days.

According to Pashinyan, the situation around the Lachin corridor is the main problem in the region today. He noted that according to the tripartite agreement of November 2020, it is the Russian peacekeeping contingent that should control this corridor, but it has been blocked for almost 20 days.



Now it turns out that the Lachin corridor is not under the control of Russian peacekeepers

- said the Armenian prime minister at a meeting with the president of Russia.

Pashinyan, we recall that, by agreement, the Azerbaijani side undertook to facilitate the unhindered passage of people and goods along the Lachin corridor. The head of the Armenian government also indicated a desire to discuss options for a way out of the current situation.

Recall that after the military conflict between Yerevan and Baku in 2020, Armenia lost control over the Lachin (Berdzor) corridor connecting it with Karabakh. According to an agreement between Baku, Yerevan and Moscow, the corridor came under the control of peacekeepers from Russia in November 2020.

At the same time, both Yerevan and Baku forget that the mandate of the Russian peacekeepers prescribes the prevention of clashes in this territory. And it does not contain any instructions regarding the prohibition of anyone to extract minerals, nor directives to prevent speeches by persons who call themselves environmentalists ...
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    27 December 2022 15: 52
    Armenian Prime Minister announced the “loss” of control over the Lachin corridor by Russian peacekeepers
    well goat .. well ..
    1. +18
      27 December 2022 16: 43
      I listen to my Armenian acquaintances living in Russia, and I don’t say anything, but I’m surprised to myself: they speak out that Russia “doesn’t help in any way, therefore it is necessary to leave the CSTO”.

      In short, one, very specific proposal is ripening in me, for all these "brothers": you ALL are rolling, to such and such a mother!
      1. +5
        27 December 2022 17: 04
        Quote: Sevastiec
        In short, one, very specific proposal is ripening in me, for all these "brothers": you ALL are rolling, to such and such a mother!


        I agree that there is no support / no benefit from the CSTO and such "allies", only expenses .... maybe it will be easier to conclude bilateral security agreements between Russia and each neighbor separately.

        And regarding our presence in the region, here we have only 2 options 1) Withdraw peacekeepers and allow neighbors to solve their problems themselves ... in this case, our base from Armenia will be asked to leave, and in a couple of years NATO bases will appear there, which everyone will be satisfied ... from Armenia - which will find a new patron for itself, to Azerbaijan - which is supported by Turkey - a member of NATO.

        2) How to react and respond to Turkey's attacks .... i.e. we understand that Azerbaijan, without any support, would not sabotage the signed agreements, but seeing our "successes" in Ukraine, and with the support of NATO, I decided to take a different side and position in general.
      2. -3
        27 December 2022 20: 58
        Azerbaijan sends millions of dollars of aid to Ukraine

        Azerbaijan sent millions of dollars of aid to Ukraine. This was announced by the head of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry Jeyhun Bayramov at a press conference following the results of the year.

        According to him, the amount of Azerbaijan's assistance to Ukraine this year amounted to more than 30 million manats. At the current exchange rate, this is over $17,5 million.
      3. -2
        27 December 2022 21: 09
        Baku sows panic among Armenians, trying to liquidate Karabakh: SVR General

        The National Security Service of Nagorno-Karabakh reported that the Azerbaijani special services, using the pages of Karabakh citizens on social networks, are spreading misinformation about the evacuation of residents of Karabakh (the Armenian name is Artsakh).

        In a conversation with a RUSARMINFO correspondent, Lieutenant General of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service Leonid Reshetnikov said that such actions are being carried out to create panic and uncertainty in Karabakh.

        Leonid Reshetnikov noted that Azerbaijan has set itself the task of liquidating Nagorno-Karabakh, and this policy is well known.
      4. -3
        27 December 2022 21: 16
        For two weeks now, Azerbaijani militants have been blockading the Lachin corridor, the only road connecting the disputed region with Armenia. On Sunday, December 25, several thousand demonstrators gathered in Stepanakert, the main city of Nagorno-Karabakh, to call on the international community to act.
      5. -3
        27 December 2022 21: 23
        I don’t know what Aliyev’s sources are, but in ancient times there was Armenia, not Azerbaijan

        Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev again expressed territorial claims against Armenia, calling the territory of the republic "Western Azerbaijan". According to Aliyev, "Yerevan and Zangezur, separated from Azerbaijan, were granted to the Armenians."

        In an interview with RUSARMINFO, Russian historian Konstantin Zalessky noted that, unlike Aliyev's own sources, it is widely known that Yerevan was a city within the Kingdom of Armenia long before the existence of Azerbaijan.

        Konstantin Zalessky noted that until 1918 no one called the individual khanates that existed on the territory of present-day Azerbaijan Azerbaijani.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGBsnqMGH0Q
      6. -4
        27 December 2022 21: 31
        The rally on Renaissance Square in Stepanakert reminded many of the late 80s, when a movement for reunification with Armenia began in Artsakh. Indeed, there is much in common in that situation with what we have now, although there are differences.

        The main thing in common is the citizen of Artsakh, his steadfastness, devotion to his land, confidence in his rightness, and therefore victory. No matter what anyone says and no matter how they argue, the decision of the people of Artsakh is unchanged: they will continue to build their state on their land.

        Today, in contrast to the 80s, our society, primarily in Armenia, is less united. More distrust of each other. Distrust, which has been deliberately planted for many years, and now we are reaping the fruits. Therefore, it is not surprising that certain critical statements addressed to the speakers at the rally in Stepanakert.

        Many critical arrows directed at Ruben Vardanyan. And here, returning to the end of the 80s, it is appropriate to recall that the Karabakh movement had many different leaders. Henrikh Poghosyan, Arkady Manucharyan, Boris Dadamyan - these names hardly say anything to today's young generation. But these people and many, many more have their own contribution to the Artsakh movement for independence and reunification with Armenia. Let's put it differently: each of them and many others had their own time - their time to make way for the Artsakh dream. Then other people came, new leaders appeared, and this is a normal process.

        We must remember that we owe all our victories to them first of all. And if today Artsakh, its elite, its citizens recognize Ruben Vardanyan as the State Minister of Artsakh, then so be it. So today is his time to contribute to the promotion of Artsakh sovereignty. Times and circumstances will change, and new leaders will appear.

        As for the support of Yerevan. And in the early 80s, and now, power, of course, is dual. Today, Pashinyan says that the bar for Artsakh's demands should be lowered, while Karen Demirchyan said that he did not have Karabakh in his pocket to give it to the protesters.

        But even then there were, and now there are those who practically do not care what the authorities in Yerevan say, and even what the authorities in Stepanakert say. They simply know that the freedom of Artsakh must be defended with arms in hand, otherwise there is no way. Regardless of who at one time or another is the face of official Stepanakert and Yerevan. And it is the people from this test who will decide the future of Artsakh, when in two years Baku will demand the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from the region.

        About the peacekeepers now and about the committee of Arkady Volsky in the early 90s. The Armenian side had many complaints about the Volsky Committee then and about the peacekeepers now. But both the Volsky Committee and the Russian peacekeepers were solving the main task: to ensure a peaceful, if possible peaceful, life of Artsakh until the time when it will be able to defend itself.

        Baku's position has not changed. Then, in response to the demands of the Artsakh people for self-determination, Baku passed a law abolishing the Nagorno-Karabakh autonomy. Today Aliyev says that Nagorno-Karabakh does not exist….

        The enemy today has a well-equipped army, in contrast to the period of the collapse of the USSR. And very substantive support for Turkey on the ground. Yes, unlike the beginning of the 90s, Artsakh has its own armed forces. But both in terms of numbers and quality of weapons, it is difficult for them to compare with the army of Azerbaijan, reinforced by the Turkish armed forces.

        This minus is obliged to compensate Yerevan, including the organization of support for Artsakh in the international arena. Today it is easier than in the late 80s, when few people heard about Artsakh. Today the issue of Artsakh is on the international agenda, no matter how Baku may object to it.

        Such parallels and differences. But the main thing that unites is something else, and the last rally in Stepanakert again confirmed this: Artsakh does not know how to give up. It has been throughout the history of the region, and nothing has changed here.”
    2. -3
      27 December 2022 20: 42
      Sivkov answered the Azerbaijanis: Your army will be defeated in a short time if the Russian army is forced to confront it
      Russian military expert, doctor of military sciences Konstantin Sivkov issued a statement in response to Azerbaijani harassment and death threats.
      The military expert stressed that he had nothing to apologize to the Azerbaijanis for, and their swearing humiliates, first of all, themselves and, in their person, the entire Azerbaijani people.

      "I distinguish between the People and the elite. The elites come and go, but the people remain. I deeply respect the Azerbaijani People. But as for the actions of the elite, I have questions for them. Tell me, you are just a person, how should I evaluate the actions of the Azerbaijani elite (not the People, but precisely the elite) which, in a critical period for Russia, creates tension on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border? I assess this as a stab in the back of my country. After all, these events led to tensions in the CSTO and our President had to resolve them. And tension still remained. That is why I said that Russia is unlikely to forget this. And these words referred precisely to your elite, and not to the People.

      I was asked the question: what will happen if the Azerbaijani armed forces attack the Russian peacekeepers. What was I to answer? I remember what our Army did on August 8, 2008, when Georgia attacked South Ossetia, hitting a battalion of our peacekeepers. Our Army, with just one division, defeated the Georgian Armed Forces in 5 days. You yourself take and compare, according to the same Internet, the combat composition of the Armed Forces of Russia and Azerbaijan. You, if you approach this objectively, will have to admit that your chances of success in confronting the Russian simply do not exist. And if a situation arises when the Russian Army is forced to confront the Azerbaijani Army, then your Army will be defeated in a very short time. This is objectively based on a comparison of combat compositions," the statement said, circulated on social networks.

      At the same time, the expert agreed that if Turkey enters the war, then it's another matter - NATO will follow it and it will come to nuclear weapons.
      "As for Ukraine, here Russia is waging war against the entire NATO bloc. Moreover, it is forced to maneuver politically not allowing an open clash with this organization, which will inevitably become nuclear and fatal for all Humanity. Only for this reason, our Army did not complete the defeat of Ukraine by May a month, how could this be done if the plan to encircle the entire grouping of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the LDNR was implemented.We took goodwill gestures and other steps to mitigate the development of the situation in Ukraine in order to prevent such a fatal development of the conflict with the West.Therefore, the NWO and dragged on. Therefore, Russia continues to drive gas and oil through third countries to Europe, and therefore agreed to a grain deal and allowing Turkey to become a gas hub in Europe. And Turkey thanks us - it blocks the admission of Finland and Sweden to NATO. Such are the games, " he noted.

      When answering a question about Russia's actions during the strike on Russian peacekeepers, Sivkov continued, if you watched this interview, I noted that this is extremely unlikely. "So I have nothing to apologize to you for. But at least you should apologize to your compatriots, to the Great Azerbaijani People, whom you insulted with your swearing at me," he stressed.

      In this vein, Sivkov presented in figures the capabilities of the Russian army in a clash with the Azerbaijani army.

      "1. Number: Russia - 1.134 million people, Azerbaijan - 66400 people.
      2. Tanks: Russia - about 12000, Azerbaijan - about 400.
      3. Guns and MLRS: Russia - about 25000, Azerbaijan - about 500
      4. Combat aircraft: Russia - about 1000, Azerbaijan - about 50.
      5. SAM, excluding MANPADS: Russia - about 800, including about 400 long and medium range. Azerbaijan - about 60. Moreover, they are all short-range. It does not have long and medium-range air defense systems at all.

      As for Ukraine, at the moment the number of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is about a million people, of which about 500 thousand are on the front line.

      Therefore, if Azerbaijan wants to have armed forces capable of resisting the Russian ones for any significant time, you need to increase the number of your armed forces, at least up to 500 thousand people, that is, increase at least 8 times, respectively, increase the military budget by about 10 times. To increase the number of tanks and other armored combat vehicles to 15000-20000 units, the number of combat aviation to 300-400 aircraft with the deployment of the appropriate ground infrastructure. Well, everything else should be increased by 5-10 times," the expert noted.
      "The Armenians criticized me a lot, but it didn't get to such savagery that the representatives of Azerbaijan allow. So if you want to have a powerful army, tighten your belts and increase the military budget by 10 times, as well as by 8 times the annual conscription of youth," Konstantin Sivkov wrote to us.

      It should be noted that Konstantin Sivkov, as well as professors Mikhail Aleksandrov and Evgeny Satanovsky, were attacked by Azerbaijanis only because they stood up for Russian peacekeepers who are being terrorized by Azerbaijani pseudo-ecologists these days. Against the backdrop of persecution, Aleksandrov lost his job.

      Sivkov himself said that he would turn to law enforcement agencies against the backdrop of death threats coming to him and his family from Azerbaijanis.
      1. +1
        28 December 2022 06: 19
        "And Turkey thanks us - it blocks the admission of Finland and Sweden to NATO ..."
        Turkey thanks Russia?? Is he out of his mind? Yes, the Ottomans promote exclusively their own interests and have never been distinguished by gratitude!
    3. -2
      27 December 2022 20: 52
      Baku observes only favorable points of the tripartite statement

      Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia Armen Grigoryan, in an interview with the Public TV channel, said that Azerbaijan wants to destroy the architecture of the tripartite statement of November 9, 2020 by blocking the Lachin corridor.

      In a conversation with a RUSARMINFO correspondent, political scientist Konstantin Kalachev said that Azerbaijan is trying to solve the problem of Nagorno-Karabakh (the Armenian name is Artsakh) as soon as possible, not paying attention to the signed documents.

      Kalachev spoke about the role of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh, announced Baku's goals, and also said whether Azerbaijan is ready to comply with the provisions of the statement of November 9, 2020.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. -4
      27 December 2022 21: 03
      The residents of Artsakh set up a camp near the Stepanakert airport, where the headquarters of the RMK is located and will be on duty until the moment when the commander of the RMK Volkov comes out to them ...... General Volkov did not come to meet with the Artsakh Armenians.

      Apparently, he simply has nothing to say to people who are cut off from the outside world due to the fact that Russian servicemen are not ready or do not want to open the Stepanakert-Goris highway.


      1. +2
        27 December 2022 21: 20
        I already feel sorry for these peacekeepers. How do they run into demanding the opening of the corridor. The impudence of the highest order to demand what is beneficial to oneself in the Azerbaijani lands and not fulfill one's promises. They used to put pressure on pity under the guise of children, but now they have switched to a brazen demand. I wonder what Vardanyan hopes for when he spews bellicose statements from himself hiding behind the backs of the Russians. After all, he knows perfectly well that if there were no Russians there, in a few hours the Azerbaijani army will deal with these impudent Vardanyan, Arayik and Kocharyan Dashnaks.
      2. +2
        28 December 2022 10: 01
        Bringing children with posters in their hands to such events is the signature style of provocateurs and organizers of color revolutions all over the world.
    6. -5
      27 December 2022 21: 11
      One of the residents of Artsakh at the Stepanakert airport said that her five minor children are now in Yerevan, separated from their parents as a result of the blockade. She demands that the peacekeepers keep their promise and ensure the safety of the people of Artsakh.
    7. -2
      27 December 2022 21: 31
      What do Azerbaijanis write about the Stepanakert demonstration? -

      The discussions in the Azerbaijani information space and social networks regarding the Stepanakert rally were considered. I present the most remarkable of them. One user suggested discussing the following topic: “Do we have a concept of what we will do with the Armenians of Karabakh? According to Aliyev, they will receive the same rights as the citizens of Azerbaijan. If I were an Armenian citizen and knew that I could get the same “rights” as the citizens of Azerbaijan, then the hairs on my head would stand on end even at the very thought of it. I think that it is necessary to give them cultural autonomy or even not prevent the opening of UN or OSCE offices there, so that the Armenians feel safe. I understand that many of us are more comfortable with the concept of "Karabakh without Armenians." If they do not exist, then there will be no problem, but the world will not understand ethnic cleansing…” In a word, he admits that Azerbaijan is a dictatorial country where citizens have no rights. Moreover, most Azerbaijanis want to get rid of the Armenians, but offer to be more “kind” so that they do not look like beasts in the eyes of the international community. Needless to say, how much such a proposal offended other Azerbaijanis.
      On one of the sites there was a publication with the same name. Ruben Vardanyan declares war on Baku. Let me quote the most interesting parts. “Aliyev's statement that Baku will not change its position under pressure was primarily addressed to Moscow.
      With this demonstration, they also sent a signal to Europe that "Karabakh does not want to be with Baku." Therefore, Vardanyan did everything to ensure a mass demonstration. The most dangerous thing for Baku in this situation is that all of them - Armenia, Russia, the West - are unanimous on this issue against Baku. This is the reason for Vardanyan’s self-confident behavior.”

      The press, oriented towards the domestic audience of Azerbaijan, is forced to state that the closure of the corridor caused a stormy response from the international community. Therefore, when Aliyev joked in his last speech that he would not change anything, no matter who called, it means that there is a lot of pressure on him, from which he is trying to defend himself. Against this background, it is no coincidence that Aliyev gave a new impetus to the topic of "Western Azerbaijan". The entire Azerbaijani propaganda field writes that "Aliyev is returning Zangezur." This is directed both at the domestic audience, with another dose of Armenian hatred, and at us, to fall into fear. History has repeatedly proven that Artsakh is the defender of Syunik. The loss of the territories of Artsakh made Syunik, Gegharkunik, Vayots Dzor extremely vulnerable. This once again proves that concessions only whet Aliyev's appetite, and in order not to give up, one must work at the daily level, on all fronts: military, diplomatic, informational, psychological, etc. Unfortunately, we are forced into false and meaningless programs because the decision makers have no solutions and are incompetent, so they prefer to create a parallel false reality for the public while time is running out and we are not properly prepared for our upcoming trials. It remains to do this at the personal and group levels, so as not to question the Armenian statehood.
  2. +6
    27 December 2022 15: 53
    This Chushkan Pashinyan, he doesn’t control himself, but he blathers something else.
  3. +3
    27 December 2022 15: 55
    So diligently put on the Americans, but demands from the Russians. So I would call Washington, my boss
    1. +4
      27 December 2022 16: 21
      Quote: APASUS
      So diligently put on the Americans, but demands from the Russians. So I would call Washington, my boss

      Call, don't be upset. And the boss decides, and the conclusions, those who need and do not need, will also draw.
  4. +7
    27 December 2022 15: 56
    Armenia will not become an American state, even if they blow in his ears as much as they like at the US Embassy in Yerevan. And where is the pasta, according to statements about Armenia.
    1. -4
      28 December 2022 03: 31
      You are behind the news. Two days since Pashinyan turned to the State Department for a roof. Ours doesn't work. Lavrov looks pale. You have to choose between Armenia or smuggling the eye of a needle through Turkey, which is still left
  5. +7
    27 December 2022 15: 58
    Maybe we should withdraw the peacekeepers ahead of schedule? I feel with a sixth sense that Azerbaijan will not be against good
    1. +1
      27 December 2022 16: 04
      Maybe we should withdraw the peacekeepers ahead of schedule? I feel with a sixth sense that Azerbaijan will not be against good

      No need. A lot of places have gone in the last 30 years. It didn't get any better or safer. negative
    2. +5
      27 December 2022 16: 04
      Yes, and the Yerevan elite will be only for. Artsakh prevents them from calmly merging into Europeanness and the Western choice. True, there is a possibility that this will not end and they will want more Turkoazers. Well, here is where the curve of this very western choice will lead.
      1. +3
        27 December 2022 16: 55
        Quote: Smoked
        Yes, and the Yerevan elite will be only for. Artsakh prevents them from calmly merging into Europeanness and the Western choice. True, there is a possibility that this will not end and they will want more Turkoazers. Well, here is where the curve of this very western choice will lead.

        The curve will lead exactly to the restoration of the Erivan Khanate as part of Azerbaijan as part of Turan ...
        1. 0
          27 December 2022 17: 12
          Quote: isv000

          The curve will lead exactly to the restoration of the Erivan Khanate as part of Azerbaijan as part of Turan ...

          And Pashinyan and his entourage, it seems, are not strongly opposed. Look how they are working in sync with Azerbaijan to squeeze out the peacekeepers.
    3. +1
      27 December 2022 16: 45
      Quote: Seal
      Maybe we should withdraw the peacekeepers ahead of schedule? I feel with a sixth sense that Azerbaijan will not be against

      There was no need to bring them in. Let them figure it out for the amusement of the respectable public ... wink
    4. 0
      27 December 2022 16: 54
      Quote: Seal
      Maybe we should withdraw the peacekeepers ahead of schedule? I feel with a sixth sense that Azerbaijan will not be against


      Azerbaijan will only be in favor, like Turkey ... and in a couple of years, NATO bases will appear there (instead of ours in the region), in fact, now everything is moving towards this.
  6. +10
    27 December 2022 16: 02
    That's right, Armenia wants someone's blood to be shed, not the Armenian truth .. What would Russia collide with Azerbaijan ..
    1. +2
      27 December 2022 17: 00
      Quote: kor1vet1974
      That's right, Armenia wants someone's blood to be shed, not the Armenian truth .. What would Russia collide with Azerbaijan ..

      Once the Armenians pissed off Ararat, they are still crying in inaction, at such a pace they will moan and sing dreary songs about Yerevan...
      1. 0
        28 December 2022 06: 33
        "Between the 1828th and XNUMXth centuries, the region of Ararat was on the border between the Ottoman Empire and Persia. The peak and northern slopes of Greater Ararat and the eastern slopes of Lesser Ararat were controlled by Persia ... Under the terms of the Turkmanchay Peace Treaty of XNUMX, the summit of Greater Ararat and its northern slopes passed to Russian Empire, and the southern slopes of Lesser Ararat became the place where the borders of all three empires converged, while the top of the mountain also became part of Russia ... "
        How can you screw up what you never had?
  7. +2
    27 December 2022 16: 04
    Let it continue to play, then they will remember that Armenians lived there and there .... There is no unity in the people and the country. When everything is fine, and okay, when they can kill everyone, you need to think not with your back seat, but with your head. In general, I see no prospects for Armenia as an independent state. Only someone's protectorate (We know what the Turks do with the Kurds who live on their outskirts). If we consider for the Russian Federation, only as a foothold in the Transcaucasus, and then, if there is a clear policy of the Russian Federation in this direction. And the Russian Federation does not have one even for the Slavs around the Russian Federation. They will devour Armenia, then Georgia will get it. Surprise these countries that believe in democracy and do not see where everything is heading. And no one teaches history what the Turks did in these territories while they had power over them.
    1. 0
      28 December 2022 06: 51
      You are right, the fate of small states on the border of empires is to be part of these countries or to pretend independence / democracy and receive handouts from the table of those who are willing to invest in zones of instability on the empire's border. But then these countries should be ready to work off these expensive handouts at the cost of economic instability, constant wars and hardships. There is no absolute freedom - everything and everyone is somehow connected in this world. There are rights, but there are also responsibilities. What did the collapse of the USSR and 31 years of freedom of the former Soviet "republics of the free" lead to? Which of them is flourishing now and where the people live richly and happily??!...
  8. +6
    27 December 2022 16: 06
    Now it turns out that the Lachin corridor is not under the control of Russian peacekeepers

    - said the Armenian prime minister at a meeting with the president of Russia.


    He what? Offers the Russians to fight for Armenia with Pashinyan, who works in conjunction with the State Department.
  9. 0
    27 December 2022 16: 11
    It’s just that Biden, traditionally, in the American way, promised him “to sit a little, fry lulyashki, bake vegetables on the grill and eat baklava,” and he was seduced, fool!
    1. 0
      27 December 2022 17: 03
      Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
      It’s just that Biden, traditionally, in the American way, promised him “to sit a little, fry lulyashki, bake vegetables on the grill and eat baklava,” and he was seduced, fool!

      He has long been sucked, by Soros, now he amuses the water and the old man ...
  10. +5
    27 December 2022 16: 25
    Yes, tired, by God! Come out, guys, from this corridor - leave everything there to chance. Let the janissaries set up the order they want there ... It is unlikely that he will like it more! This effigy does not understand that it is only thanks to Russia that it is not yet swinging on a lantern on Spandaryan Square, and Azerbaijani victorious soldiers are not dancing their Jangi dance under it. Only thanks to the constant intercession of Russia!!!
  11. +5
    27 December 2022 16: 26
    Armenia lost control of the corridor along with Karabakh and 7 other Azerbaijani majority regions, which were occupied in 1992 by Armenia, which then expelled the majority Azerbaijani population. Access to Karabakh through the Lachin corridor (both of which are inside Azerbaijan's internationally recognized border) was again granted to Armenia in exchange for a promise that Armenia would provide Azerbaijan with a land corridor to the Azerbaijani enclave of Nakhichevan.

    But as soon as the Russian military arrived, Armenia began using them as shields (knowing that Aliyev would not want to destroy relations with Russia) and refused to fulfill his promise with the support of France. Azerbaijan must take back all the benefits provided to these people. When Armenia invaded, over 700000 Azerbaijanis became refugees and every mosque was reduced to rubble. Azerbaijan stated that it would restore local churches along with destroyed mosques and hand them over to Azerbaijani Christians. How many native Armenians became refugees this time? Even the majority of Armenians still live in Azerbaijani Karabakh.

    A significant number of Azeris are Christian/Jewish and do not complain that the state is biased or repressive towards them. This is due to the fact that Azerbaijan is a Muslim-majority country with a secular constitution. Armenia acts as a mafia state religious extremists who displace locals and colonize when they enter the multi-ethnic zone.
  12. -1
    27 December 2022 16: 28
    Maybe a tour of the Mikhailovsky Castle will remind him of the story...
    1. 0
      27 December 2022 16: 29
      The new generation of Presidents no longer teaches history.
    2. 0
      27 December 2022 17: 09
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      Maybe a tour of the Mikhailovsky Castle will remind him of the story...

      Nothing will help this little pig, except for our Victory, then many former ones will again begin to fawn and tremble ...
  13. +2
    27 December 2022 16: 31
    Armenian Prime Minister announced the “loss” of control over the Lachin corridor by Russian peacekeepers
    . The question is... and this figure, who is he, who is he with, who is he for???
    The answer has long been clearly known, there is no other.
  14. +6
    27 December 2022 16: 36
    Again, "Russians must"! Or maybe at least 1/10 of the Armenians from Moscow will take machine guns and try to defend their kind of homeland - Armenia ?!
    1. +3
      27 December 2022 16: 48
      Quote: Dmitry Karabanov
      Or maybe at least 1/10 of the Armenians from Moscow will take machine guns and try to defend THEIR kind of like one - Armenia ?!

      Why 1/10? And 100% weak? And then to stay there forever to equip "great Armenia"
    2. 0
      28 December 2022 07: 08
      And the other 1/10 will try to defend their kind of homeland - Russia
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +5
    27 December 2022 17: 33
    So the Lachin corridor should exist along with the corridor to Nakhichevan. Does he exist? He is not. There are questions for all three parties that signed the agreement
  18. +2
    27 December 2022 21: 14
    Very strange people, sitting on a territory that is recognized by the whole world as Azerbaijan and dictating their terms and even demanding that everyone dance to their "music" is just nonsense and shock !!
  19. 0
    28 December 2022 09: 44
    Quote from Romanovski
    I don’t know what Aliyev’s sources are, but in ancient times there was Armenia, not Azerbaijan
    The greatest minds of mankind have long expressed their opinion about the quality of Ancient History, Ancient History and a significant part of the History of the Middle Ages.

    1) "History is only a fable accepted by all."
    B. Fontenel
    2) "History is a fiction with which everyone agrees."
    Вольтер
    3) "In the history of any nation there are many pages that would be magnificent, if they were true."
    Denis Diderot
    4) "History is sometimes something that never happened, described by those who have never been there."
    E. Poncela
    5) "History begins when nothing is already impossible to verify."
    V. Verkhovsky
    6) "Those who make history often at the same time falsify it."
    V. Brudzinsky
    7) "No one has changed the history of mankind like historians."
    E. Mackenzie
    8) "God cannot change the past, but historians can. And it must be just because sometimes they render this service that God tolerates their existence."
    Samuel Butler
    9) "History is like a meat paste: it is better not to peer at how it is prepared."
    Aldous Huxley
    10) "Everything is in the hands of the Lord, and only History has slipped out of His control."
    Zbigniew Hedgehog
    11) "What will history say?" "History, sir, lies, as always." George Bernard Shaw
    12) "If you remove all the lies from history, this does not mean at all that only the truth will remain - as a result, nothing may remain at all."
    Jerzy Stanislav Lets.
    13) The depth of centuries is already visible to us in indistinguishable detail, and only the historian has been given the opportunity to lie in documents.
    I.M. Guberman
  20. +1
    28 December 2022 09: 55
    Quote from Sadam2
    You are behind the news. Two days since Pashinyan turned to the State Department for a roof.
    Actually this is not news.
    Let's remember the history of Armenian-American relations.
    Let's not forget that, speaking of centuries-old friendship with us, Armenian politicians have been oriented towards the United States since the end of the 19th century. After the First World War, the Armenian delegation went out of its way at the Paris Peace Conference to become a US mandated territory. President Wilson himself promised the Armenians that it would be so. But at that time there was no powerful Armenian lobby in the US Congress. And the US Congress did not support its president, refusing to accept Armenia under mandate control.
    But by the time of the collapse of the USSR, the Armenian lobby in the US Congress was already second in terms of influence, after the Israeli one.
    After the collapse of the USSR, the members of the Armenian caucus in the US Congress firmly raised the issue of the need to protect Armenia before the Administration of US President George W. Bush!
    And here the Administration of the President of the United States began to scratch their turnips. It is impossible to ignore the request of the Armenian lobby - it is very influential and is needed to resolve many other important issues for the US Presidential Administration. On the other hand, it is necessary to ensure the protection of Armenia in such a way as not to irritate the old NATO member - Turkey, with which the United States then had love and complete mutual understanding. And yet it is impossible not to offend a new friend - Yeltsin's Russia, where the best friend of the United States, Andrei Kozyrev, was then in charge of foreign affairs.
    It would seem that at that time the easiest solution would be to accept Armenia into NATO. But this would just anger Turkey and, probably, us, Russia, too. Moreover, it contradicted the NATO Charter, since states that have territorial disputes with neighboring NATO members cannot be admitted to NATO. Armenia, on the other hand, lays claim to part of the territory of a NATO member - Turkey.
    It would be possible to place a US military base in Armenia. But this step will cause exactly the same reaction. And how can one explain to American taxpayers why the US needs a base in Armenia, when there are already US bases in neighboring Turkey?
    And then the United States made a clever Jesuit move. They recommended the Armenians to ask for a base…. at Russia. And the Armenians, who until recently sought to get away from Moscow to such an extent that they banned the holding of a referendum on the preservation of the USSR on the territory of Armenia, quickly changed their shoes and began to sing songs about the great friendship of the Armenian people to the great Russian people. And Kozyrev presented this case to Yeltsin in such a way that we could allegedly put a hedgehog in the pants of the United States and that the United States, they say, will not be able to do anything to us in response. Of course, this proposal delighted Yeltsin. As a result, Kozyrev received Yeltsin's favor, and Armenia received our base.
    And the USA joyfully rubbed their hands. Since this decision alone immediately killed a lot of rabbits.
    - Ensured the security of Armenia without quarreling with Turkey;
    - Saved money;
    - They laid a mine under Russian-Turkish and Russian-Azerbaijani relations for decades to come.
  21. +1
    28 December 2022 10: 14
    Quote from Romanovski
    She demands that the peacekeepers keep their promise and ensure the safety of the people of Artsakh.
    What are the promises? Who promised whom and what?
    We look at the third article of the Agreement.
    3. Along the line of contact in Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachin corridor, a peacekeeping contingent of the Russian Federation is deployed in the amount of 1960 servicemen with small arms, 90 armored personnel carriers, 380 units of automobile and special equipment.

    You see, it is written that the peacekeeping contingent is deployed not in the Lachin corridor, but along the Lachin corridor.
    And part 3 of paragraph 6 of the Agreement says that
    The Republic of Azerbaijan guarantees the safety of traffic along the Lachin corridor of citizens, vehicles and goods in both directions.

    So what is the problem ? Azerbaijan provided you with security of movement. But, excuse me, smuggling is stopped everywhere.
    Please do not confuse concepts traffic safety и prevention of smuggling.