Footage of two Russian Lancet UAVs allegedly stuck in a camouflage net over a Ukrainian Armed Forces tank appeared

49
Footage of two Russian Lancet UAVs allegedly stuck in a camouflage net over a Ukrainian Armed Forces tank appeared

Footage of two Russian Lancet-3M strike UAVs appeared on the Internet, allegedly stuck in a camouflage net stretched over a tank T-72M belonging to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. About the reason why Drones there were, you can only build versions.

It is unlikely that the drone simply could not overcome such a frivolous obstacle as an ordinary camouflage net, because the Lancet is moving towards the target at high speed, and here, it turns out that two drone, which is highly doubtful.



Therefore, it makes sense to consider other possible options. For example, a drone could be shot down, after which it fell onto the grid. Or there was simply a staging of the APU fighters, that is, they put the fragments of downed or for some reason unworked loitering ammunition on top of the net in order to shoot beautiful shots. It can also be assumed that the drone still worked before reaching the tank. For example, bumping into a tree branch.

On the other hand, the footage also shows that the Lancet strike, if it is not a XNUMX% staged attack, was delivered precisely on the tank, that is, the disguise did not help him. But this time the crew was lucky. And since the tank continues to be on the front line, such luck may end at some point.


Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +42
    December 24 2022
    The staging is 100%, such crap will simply tear the grid ... and here "two at once"! Nonsense for fools who threw cans of cucumbers at our Caliber and "knocked them out of hunting rifles", that is, for boars!
    1. +7
      December 24 2022
      Or was it just a staging of the fighters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, that is, they laid down the wreckage of the downed ....

      I have no doubt that these big forelock artists and the need for inventions are cunning. They must be beaten mercilessly and regularly.

      This is from the same Ukrainian series, only with cucumbers.
      1. +5
        December 24 2022
        Quote: Fisherman
        such crap will simply tear the grid ... and here "two at once"!
        In all the photos, the remains of the same "lancet", only filed at different scales (in the photo, behind the "lancet" on the left are 2 doubled branches and on the right are 2 doubled branches, if you take the branch at 45 ° to the left in both pictures ).
    2. +9
      December 24 2022
      It would be true, they would not take pictures on the camera from the first Nokia with a camera but 0,3 mp laughing
      1. 0
        December 26 2022
        because initially this is a video, you can see it in more detail
    3. +3
      December 25 2022
      This is true. There are 12 kg, and the speed is over 200 km/h. The mesh is torn to shreds
      1. +3
        December 25 2022
        Yes, it will simply explode from braking from 100 km / h to zero at a distance of a meter from the tank, the detonator is unlikely to ignore such wild overloads.
    4. +1
      December 26 2022
      Disagree. As an aircraft modeler, he planted models weighing more simply in tall grass without damage. A network of nylon thread can quite easily catch such a drone weighing several kg. flying at a speed of 120 km/h.
  2. +10
    December 24 2022
    Forgive me Alexander Sergeevich .....
    Children ran into the hut
    In a hurry they call the father
    Dad! Dad! Our networks
    They dragged the Lancet
    That way they will start "catching" missiles. Why do they need a Patriot? Let the nets knit....
    1. +10
      December 24 2022
      Quote: wandlitz
      Children ran into the hut
      In a hurry they call the father
      Dad! Dad! Our networks
      They dragged the Lancet

      Yes
      "Lie, lie, imps,
      - Hemmed maroon beret;
      - Oh, these are my robots!
      You will already have the Lancet!
  3. +11
    December 24 2022
    two Lancet-3M UAVs allegedly stuck in a camouflage net

    two UAVs in one tank?
    Already funny.
    1. -20
      December 24 2022
      two UAVs in one tank?

      As far as I understand, the Lancet will not be able to destroy the tank, and neither will two Lancets. Lancets with cumulative BGs do not seem to be released yet.
      1. +8
        December 24 2022
        ZALA Lancet can be used for both reconnaissance and strike missions, has a maximum flight range of 40-50 km [5] depending on the subversion and a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of about 12 kg. In combat mode, it can be armed with both high-explosive fragmentation and cumulative warheads.
        1. +2
          December 24 2022
          it can be armed with both high-explosive fragmentation and cumulative warheads

          Thank you, did not know
      2. 0
        December 25 2022
        Almost all of the latest videos show the launch of a cumulative jet several meters ahead. But the tank is not guaranteed to be destroyed, just as it is not guaranteed to be destroyed using RPGs
      3. +2
        December 26 2022
        I myself realized what I wrote, the Lancets have already destroyed so many armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine that it is impossible to count, and here you are carrying this ridiculous blizzard !!!
  4. +12
    December 24 2022
    And they also shoot corresponding videos ...
    and this site is muddying the waters.
    1. +10
      December 24 2022
      Quote: Irek
      and this site is muddying the waters.

      Everyone earns as he can. But we are already used to them. They can't "twist"! )))
  5. 0
    December 24 2022
    There was a metal mesh - you can believe it. But camouflage?!
    1. +14
      December 24 2022
      Quote: stankow
      There was a metal mesh - you can believe it. But camouflage?!

      No, I never believe. Estimate the weight of the Lancet, its speed near the ground and the stretched, even if metal, net. This is how it was necessary to stretch the net so that it could withstand a blow of such force and not break.
      In a word - poor duck.
      1. +1
        December 24 2022
        I think so !
        .........................
      2. 0
        December 25 2022
        The question here is how the fuse did not work, from the grid to the tank a meter or two, the drone dropped the speed from 100 km / h to zero and did not explode at the same time ?!
  6. -1
    December 24 2022
    We sit and wait!!! Wet the creature .. Already in full
  7. +9
    December 24 2022
    Quote: wandlitz
    They dragged the Lancet
    That way they will start "catching" missiles. Why do they need a Patriot? Let the nets knit....

    We are waiting for pictures with "caught" Calibers. Why are there Calibers, they should catch Iskanders! Or maybe strategic bombers laughing
    1. 0
      December 26 2022
      Daggers will soon be caught in their net, too, stupid clowns.
    2. 0
      December 26 2022
      They don’t have pelagic trawls, they ran out with the fleet, otherwise these calibers from the X-101 would be caught in flocks. ))))
  8. +3
    December 24 2022
    Quarter 95 knows how to put on a show, and in dill, most of the management are showmen.
    1. +6
      December 24 2022
      Quarter 95 knows how to put on a show, and in dill, most of the management are showmen.

      The other day they reported that a director from the 95th team was banged in the Donbass. Went as a volunteer. One less clown...
      1. 0
        December 26 2022
        Something I can’t believe that the director of the “quarter” volunteered and the zelebobik did not attach him to allowance like everyone else. I read that the game developer "Stalker" by the name of Yezhov received a bullet near Artemovsk - yes.
  9. +2
    December 24 2022
    Well, Ukraine, they even have Kevlar nets laughing
  10. +3
    December 24 2022
    They didn’t get stuck) They pretended to be rags and transfer valuable reconnaissance to the "center")
  11. +1
    December 24 2022
    the frames also show that the strike of the Lancets, if this is not one hundred percent staged, was applied precisely to the tank,

    Thanks to the supporters of Russia who posted the photo, if this is not a bluff. The developers of the Lancet will definitely work on their product so that the double camouflage net is no longer an obstacle to achieving an effective strike. sad
    1. +3
      December 24 2022
      They will be equipped with a self-liquidator for the curious.
  12. +2
    December 24 2022
    In order to avoid such situations, kamikaze drones must have a "self-destruct" mode (if not already installed on them). In the event that the drone attacked the target, but could not hit (for any reason) after 3-5 seconds it explodes! hi
    1. -4
      December 24 2022
      Gotta learn the mat part! After that, you can be smart.
      1. +3
        December 24 2022
        Quote: senima56
        In order to avoid such situations, kamikaze drones should be set to "self-destruct" mode
        What do we see in the photo? A whole "lancet" or its fragments? Wreckage. That is, perhaps somewhere nearby, there is a target destroyed by this "Lancet", and its fragments after the explosion flew to this camouflage net (the network is whole, which means the explosion was not in this place, which is in the photo)
  13. +4
    December 24 2022
    Excuse me, but who said it was the Lancet? It is different in the tail and I do not see the engine with a propeller in the photo. This is some kind of imitation fragments. Look carefully at the photo of the original (sorry, I don’t know how to transfer pictures)
  14. -1
    December 24 2022
    Is there a contact fuse on the lancet?
  15. -1
    December 24 2022
    It may very well be. Everything ingenious is simple. And for screamers about the fact that this cannot be, I suggest thinking about how ships with power plants of tens of thousands of horsepower wind nets around propellers
  16. -4
    December 24 2022
    All the videos I've seen show the lancet attacking from the side, almost parallel to the ground, not from above. therefore, 10 KG at a speed of 50 m / s may well "get tangled" in a camouflage net. But why didn't it work??? although marriage happens to everyone, maybe even broke through the grid and crashed into a tank but did not explode.
  17. 0
    December 25 2022
    Something thumped nearby, fragments were thrown onto this grid, the burnt edges of the grid were invisible.
  18. +1
    December 25 2022
    It’s fake, there’s even no doubt about it. Well, if the Lancet ran into the grid, there would be an explosion. Here the nets and the end of the tank, like this fairy tale. Remember how the ukrobots made fun of the welded gratings on the towers on our tanks from the Javelins, it turns out we had to pull on a simple maskset. But it's a "Made in from there" maskset.
  19. 0
    December 25 2022
    The blow was planned for the dog, which is at the bottom in the second picture. But, since both the net and the dog are American, there is nothing to be surprised at. What to talk about, they repaint their lined equipment in our tactical signs and take pictures, claiming that the column has just been knocked out. The same visionaries as their puppeteers.
  20. 0
    December 25 2022
    And where is the second alleged "lancet"?
  21. -1
    December 26 2022
    I heard that the tank does not lead to anything
  22. +1
    December 26 2022
    Staged for PR virtual piggy for Khryukain pigs.
  23. +2
    December 26 2022
    Why discuss such nonsense?
    Simple guess....
    Drones have a device for self-detonation. It is necessary.
    Well, what kind of fools is this "movie" designed for?????
    It should be in the frame, a couple of banderlogs that would "break" the wings of this "Geranya", caught in a net, with handcuffs .....
  24. 0
    December 26 2022
    It would be necessary to stuff a kilogram of explosives into the wings so that it would explode with a cross, with any touch after cocking (the start of the attack).
  25. 0
    December 27 2022
    The moral "spirit" of one's own must be maintained, at least even with such garbage !!!, Russian "lancets". They don't even break through the network. Saloedy advice to you - ask those who no longer answer how this thing works.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"