Boulevard Voltaire: NATO is increasingly involved in the conflict in Ukraine, increasing the threat of all-out war

As noted by the French publication Boulevard Voltaire, the North Atlantic Alliance is increasingly slipping into the participation of its troops in the confrontation with Russia in Ukraine.

NATO leaders under the slogan "No victory for Russia!" increase the supply of various weapons to Kyiv, thereby provoking a dangerous escalation of the conflict with the direct involvement of the alliance, notes Boulevard Voltaire columnist Frederic Lasse.

According to Lasse, this view is also confirmed by the recent statement by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who said that the events in Ukraine could escalate into "a big war between NATO and Russia." Earlier in October, at a press conference in Brussels, Stoltenberg stressed that the defeat of Ukraine would mean a virtual defeat for the NATO countries.

At the same time, the publication writes that it is not yet clear which processes can lead to NATO's direct participation in the conflict. However, it is obvious that the alliance is preparing for a variety of scenarios. So, back in June, it was announced that a permanent American headquarters would be organized in Poland, and the US 101st Airborne Division would be deployed in Romania. This month there was information about the deployment of French troops in Romania as well. tanks Leclerc.

Some call the possibility of NATO's direct involvement a political fantasy, but, according to Lasse, given that both sides stand their ground and are not going to give in, declaring that they are ready to go to the end, it is worth waiting for the conflict to escalate. Moreover, the conflict itself may well go beyond control and begin to develop according to a scenario that is beyond the control of any of its parties.

Comments

[dmi.pris1]

NATO strikes on Russian territory is already a fact of involvement in the conflict

[marchcat]

NATO is increasingly involved in the conflict in Ukraine

This is no longer engagement, but participation. Do not confuse the soft with the warm... We just need to call things by their proper names and stop flirting with the West.

[Ivan Ivanov]

Our politicians are afraid to aggravate because of the difference in potentials, and they keep us on this hook, periodically throwing additional bait either from the old fox of Kissinger, or from "conservative America." The enemy sees our weaknesses perfectly ..

[Egeny]

Quote: Ivan Gorinich_2

The agreement is CURRENT, but Crimean is ours

Yes, the treaty is in force and Crimea is ours.)
Soon the outskirts of Donbass will be Lvov. What Ukraine are you talking about?

[Terenin]

Quote from Egeni

Soon the outskirts of Donbass will be Lvov.

This is if the West rebuilds it again, as we do Mariupol.

[voice of reason]

Yes, what a retraction, this NATO war against Russia is already underway. Do you think that by supplying weapons and crews to them and shells with which you kill our soldiers, you can still excuse yourself later - we didn’t fight with Russia in the house? no. Everyone will be asked later. For every little pig, a wolf will knock on the door ...

[Essex62]

Hats will not end, by the time the questioner is blunted? What wolf? He does not know how to jump out of the harlot, with the least loss for money.
Who needs this pull? The disposal of the Russians is going according to plan, without any "head to head"

[I dare to_notice_]

I would like to hear Russia's reaction to this "involvement".
At least in relation to the notorious "52 countries" with which Ukraine is going to share its (Russia's) skin ...

[I dare to_notice_]

"Everyone will be asked later."
Too shy to ask...
Why not now?
Oops, I forgot!
We have contracts...

[rotmistr60]

the alliance is preparing for a variety of scenarios

That is why they are probing the reaction and the possibilities of Russia's response actions by preparing and carrying out terrorist attacks on the "SP", the Crimean bridge, striking with Ukrainian hands into the depths of Russian territory. They blew up the "SP" - silence, the Crimean bridge - strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, which should have been gouged in the first days of the operation, a blow on the airfield with strategic bombers - again Ukrainian infrastructure. The Polish weapons hub is acting boldly and brazenly, regular military personnel are participating in hostilities with entire units, heavy types of weapons are pouring in a stream - in response, so far, we are grinding manpower and equipment in the Donbass. And NATO puts everything in its "notebook", every sneeze and cough is noted and appropriate conclusions are drawn.

[Ivan Ivanov]

Those who argue are drawn in because they do not see a serious threat and allies from us. It is worth kicking comrade Xi more actively, who, it is possible, expects to loop. If we can't destroy entry points with conventional weapons, it's worth using nuclear tactical.

[sanik2020]

NATO is increasingly involved in the conflict in Ukraine

What does it mean to get involved?
Didn't NATO start all this?
Isn't NATO warming up all this by supplying money, weapons and ammunition?
Is it not NATO countries that, under the guise of mercenaries, send entire military units to Banderstat?

[YOUR]

Some call the possibility of NATO's direct involvement a political fantasy, but, according to Lasse, given that both sides stand their ground and are not going to give in, declaring that they are ready to go to the end, it is worth waiting for the conflict to escalate. Moreover, the conflict itself may well go beyond control and begin to develop according to a scenario that is beyond the control of any of its parties.

The fact that Russia will not stop is clear and understandable, for us it is tantamount to a loss. But whether the NATO members can resist and keep their dogs like the Balts and Poles is a question.

[Pravodel]

NATO is getting more and more involved

The Anglo-Saxons want to arrange a 2nd Afghanistan for us. But here they miscalculated. Times have changed.

[Egeny]

Quote: Ivan Gorinich_2

This is your dreams so far

Okay, Ivan. What dreams ... ours, not ours, we'll live to see.
And about Sberbank and Russian Railways - cowards, but the trains still go through the bridge.

[Egeny]

Quote: Terenin

This is if the West rebuilds it again

Didn't understand. Do you want to give away the city?
I have some doubts about the western edge, but that's later.)

[Egeny]

Quote: The Truth

The Anglo-Saxons want to give us the 2nd Afghan

In fact, they've already set it up. We have been swinging for too long, even the GDP once said this.

[Egeny]

Quote: YOUR

to keep your dogs like the Balts and Poles is a question.

Issues need to be addressed as they come up.
Let's solve this one.)

[Egeny]

Quote: IvanIvanov

it is worth using nuclear tactical.

Ivanov, three stars, but you are talking such nonsense.)

[Egeny]

Quote: Ivan Gorinich_2

won't even knock

And here I agree with you. (+)